Skip to main content
Cell Death & Disease logoLink to Cell Death & Disease
. 2022 Jul 23;13(7):644. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05075-2

RNA-based therapeutics: an overview and prospectus

Yiran Zhu 1, Liyuan Zhu 1, Xian Wang 2, Hongchuan Jin 1,
PMCID: PMC9308039  PMID: 35871216

Abstract

The growing understanding of RNA functions and their crucial roles in diseases promotes the application of various RNAs to selectively function on hitherto “undruggable” proteins, transcripts and genes, thus potentially broadening the therapeutic targets. Several RNA-based medications have been approved for clinical use, while others are still under investigation or preclinical trials. Various techniques have been explored to promote RNA intracellular trafficking and metabolic stability, despite significant challenges in developing RNA-based therapeutics. In this review, the mechanisms of action, challenges, solutions, and clinical application of RNA-based therapeutics have been comprehensively summarized.

Subject terms: Antisense oligonucleotide therapy, Drug delivery

Facts

  • Small molecules and antibody drugs target only 0.05% of the human genome, and most disease targets lack defining active sites for small-molecule binding.

  • Abundant RNAs selectively act on proteins, transcripts and genes, which broaden the range of druggable targets. A defined sequence of RNA drugs makes the design of RNA therapeutics much easier.

  • Multiple RNA drugs are approved and a dozen more are in phase III trials to treat rare and common diseases.

Open questions

  • How do RNA molecules function in treating diseases?

  • The challenges and solutions to the discovery and development of RNA-based drugs effectively.

Introduction

The antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) inhibiting protein synthesis in the early 1980s promoted the rapid advances of RNA-based therapeutics [1]. In the 2000s, the proposal of RNAi and the use of siRNA silencing the human gene led to increased funding for RNA therapeutics [2]. Other RNA molecule regulators and related mechanisms also have been well characterized. So far, there are several approved RNA-based medications and many in phase III studies [3] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. An overview of major developments in the RNA-targeting field.

Fig. 1

A timeline of RNA-based technological advances, drug approvals and other important events are highlighted. Rapid development in the RNA-targeting field has been applied to treat rare and common diseases. ASOs antisense oligonucleotides, RNAi RNA interference, RISC RNA-induced silencing complex, siRNA small interfering RNA, saRNA small activating RNAs, ssRNA single-stranded RNA.

Compared to conventional protein-targeted and DNA-based medicines, RNA-based therapeutics are prospective due to their distinct physicochemical and physiological properties [4]. RNAs function in three essential biological macromolecules: DNAs, RNAs, and proteins. RNA molecules such as ASOs, small interfering RNA (siRNAs), and microRNAs (miRNAs) can directly target mRNAs and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) through Watson–Crick base-pairing [4]. Therefore, RNA can theoretically target any interest gene by selecting the correct nucleotide sequence on the target RNA. By contrast, only 0.05% of the human genome has been drugged by the currently approved protein-targeted therapeutics (small-molecule chemicals and antibodies) since most DNA sequences of the human genome are transcribed into noncoding transcripts [5]. Besides, around 85% of proteins lack specific clefts and pockets for small molecules binding [6]. In addition, in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA can be applied for protein replacement treatment or immunization after entering the cytoplasm [7]. This process would not cause irreversible genome changes and induce genetic risks like DNA-based therapeutics [8]. Moreover, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-based genome editing can directly modify target RNA sequences to treat specific disorders [9]. RNA aptamers can also block protein activity, similar to small-molecule inhibitors and antibodies [10]. Therefore, RNA-based therapies can broaden the range of druggable targets and are regarded as the most attractive therapeutic target.

This review provides an overview of significant developments in RNA-based therapeutics. The classification of RNA-based therapies and their modes of action have been outlined. This review also covers critical challenges in applying these RNA therapies and possible solutions. Finally, the current preclinical and clinical trials of RNA therapeutics have also been summarized.

Types of RNA-based therapeutics and modes of action

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs)

The ASOs are short single-stranded (ss) oligonucleotides (12–24 nucleotides (nt)) complementary to the specific RNA through Watson–Crick base-pairing. They can alter RNA and reduce, restore, or modify protein expression [11]. ASOs are divided into occupancy-mediated degradation and occupancy-only models based on different post-hybridization mechanisms [11] (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2. Types of RNA-based therapeutics and modes of action.

Fig. 2

A Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) can modulate the target gene expression through two mechanisms. (①) In the occupancy-mediated degradation way, ASOs trigger the target mRNA cleavage by RNase H1 or ribozymes. The Occupancy-only mechanisms do not directly degrade target RNA. Instead, it regulates the gene expression in several ways: (②) alter RNA splicing using splice-switching ASOs to induce exon skipping or exon inclusion; (③) lead to nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD); (④) inhibit or activate translation; (⑤) block the microRNAs binding to target mRNA. B RNA interference (RNAi). Long double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and precursor microRNA (pre-miRNA) are processed by Dicer into short interfering RNA (siRNA). The antisense strand (indicated as a blue strand) of siRNA is loaded into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) for RNA targeting, degradation or translation repression. C CRISPR/Cas-based RNA editing system includes two Cas nuclease categories, Cas9 and Cas13. A guide RNA(gRNA) binds to Cas9 to cleave ssRNA with (①) or without (②) the help of a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM). (③) A single CRISPR RNA (crRNA) guides Cas13 to target specific RNA having a protospacer flanking sequence (PFS). (④) In addition to knockdown target RNA, a catalytically deactivated Cas13b (dCas9b) facilitates the A-to-I editing with ADAR. D RNA aptamers function as agonizts or delivery agents. (①) As an antagonist aptamer, Pegaptanib interacts explicitly with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to inhibit the interaction of VEGF with its receptors, thus treating macular degeneration. (②) Cell type-specific RNA aptamers deliver agents (miRNA, siRNA, shRNA, antibody and chemotherapy drugs) by linking to or conjugating. E mRNA vaccine. (①) The mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (mRNA-1273) is delivered into antigen-presenting cells by lipid nanoparticle (LNP). (②)The mRNA encoding SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is released into the cytoplasm and translated to antigen protein by the ribosome. (③) Some antigen proteins are degraded into small peptides by the proteasome and presented to the surface of CD8+ T cells by major histocompatibility complex I (MHCI). The CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell-mediated immunity kills infected cells by secreting perforin or granzyme. (④) Other antigen proteins are degraded in the lysosome and displayed on the surface of T helper cells by MHC II. The B-cell/antibody-mediated humoral immunity uses antibodies to neutralize pathogens.

In the occupancy-mediated degradation, ASOs bind to and cleave the target RNA at the ASO binding sites through endogenous enzymes, enhancing the downregulation of target transcripts (Fig. 2A①). This mechanism is also known as enzymatic RNA degradation since it depends on specific enzymes [11]. RNase H1-mediated degradation is the most well-defined mechanism, where RNase H1 acts as a highly selective endonuclease to cleave the RNA-DNA heteroduplex explicitly. RNase H1 easily targets both the cytoplasmic and nuclear transcripts due to its ubiquitous distribution [12]. Other enzymes, such as ribozymes, can also mediate occupancy-mediated degradation [13]. The ribozyme cleaves target RNAs through hammerhead or hairpin structures [14]. And its substrate recognition domain can be modified to promote cis or trans-site-specific cleavage further.

In the occupancy-only mechanisms, ASOs control the down-/ up-regulation of target transcripts by binding to them without the help of specific enzymes. Sometimes this mechanism is also called the steric block mechanism. Altering RNA splicing is the most widely used strategy [15]. Splice-switching ASOs can change the splicing pattern by targeting splicing regulatory cis-elements [16]. Cis-acting elements activate or inhibit adjacent splice sites through recruiting trans-splicing factors. They consist of splicing enhancers and silencers. When ASOs base-pairing with a splicing enhancer sequence, the stimulatory splicing factor can not bind to its cognate enhancer-binding site, inhibiting splicing and causing exon skipping. Conversely, ASOs target a splicing silencer sequence element that blocks the binding of the inhibitory splicing factor. As a result, the silencer element negatively regulates splicing activation at the splice site, resulting in exon inclusion (Fig. 2A②). Eteplirsen modulates exon skipping [17], and nusinersen induces exon inclusion [18]. In the application part, we discuss these two splice-modulating ASO drugs, eteplirsen and nusinersen. Occupancy-only ASOs can also activate endogenous cellular surveillance programs that remove abnormal mRNAs. The targets can be degraded via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) when ASOs act on pre-mRNAs to create mRNAs with premature termination codons (PTCs) [19] (Fig. 2A③). Moreover, ASOs can inhibit or activate translation. On the one hand, ASOs can downregulate the target RNA via translational arrest [20], 5’cap inhibition [21], or polyadenylation changes [22]. On the other hand, ASOs can also bind to inhibitory elements, such as upstream open reading frames (uORFs) [23] or other translation inhibitory components (TIEs) [24], thus upregulating target RNAs (Fig. 2A④). Furthermore, ASOs can inhibit miRNA-mediated downregulation by directly binding to miRNAs (miRNA inhibitors or antagomirs) [25] or combining with mRNAs at miRNA-binding sites to inhibit miRNA interaction (miRNA competitors or block-mir) [26] (Fig. 2A⑤). Occupancy-only ASOs allow more nucleotide modifications than RNase H1-dependent ASOs, thus improving ASO drug properties. Notably, occupancy-only ASOs should not form RNA-DNA duplex to avoid forming RNase H1or Ago2 substrates and unnecessary cleavage of target RNA.

RNA interference (RNAi)

RNAi is an endogenous cellular process inducing double-stranded (ds) RNAs -triggered degradation of particular RNA targets, which provide an intrinsic defensive mechanism against invading viruses and transposable elements [2, 27, 28]. siRNAs are short dsRNAs (20-24 nt) with distinct structures containing 5’-phosphate/3’-hydroxyl endings and two 3’-overhang ribonucleotides on each duplex strand [29, 30]. siRNAs can induce RNAi in mammalian cells. Therefore, researchers can use such simple gene silencing tools to investigate gene function and advance disease therapy [31]. Mechanistically, the endoribonuclease Dicer cuts dsRNAs and isolates the guide and passenger strands within the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). The argonaute2 (AGO2) protein degrades the passenger siRNA strand, whereas the guide siRNA strand directly binds to the target RNA, causing AGO2-mediated cleavage [32] (Fig. 2B). Besides degrading cytoplasmic RNAs, siRNAs can also trigger chromatin remodeling and histone modifications in the nucleus when they bind to the promoter regions, resulting in transcriptional silence [31, 33].

miRNAs are endogenous single-stranded small ncRNAs influencing gene expression via RNAi [34]. The biogenesis of miRNAs follows a systematic process. First, miRNAs are produced from lengthy primary precursor miRNAs (pri-miRNAs), cleaved in the nucleus by RNase III–family nuclease Drosha. The free pre-miRNAs are then transported to the cytoplasm, where their loop regions are cleaved by Dicer to produce mature miRNA. The mature miRNA duplex (comprising two strands) is loaded into the pre-RISC for strand selection. One of the two miRNA strands is selectively loaded into the miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC), whereas the other strand is ejected from the complex and is subject to degradation. Both strands may be loaded into RISC at similar frequencies, while different strand usage depending on biological contexts. The strand from the 5′ end of the stem-loop and the 3′ strand are named “5p” and “3p”, respectively [35, 36]. Finally, miRNAs cause mRNA translational repression or degradation in the miRNA-induced silencing complex (miRISC) by base-pairing with specific RNA sequences (often in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR)) [34] (Fig. 2B). Interestingly, emerging evidence has revealed that miRNAs can upregulate targeted genes through increasing mRNA stability or/and translation [37]. For example, miR-346 targets the amyloid-β peptide precursor protein (APP) mRNA 5′-UTR to upregulate APP translation and amyloid-β production [38]. miR-466l elevates IL-10 mRNA stability and IL-10 protein expression through binding to IL-10 AU-rich elements [39]. miRNAs have crucial roles in regulating gene expression and human diseases. miRNA mimics have been currently in preclinical development as putative therapeutic agents. Chemically modified, completely base-paired siRNAs with the identical guide strand sequence as an endogenous miRNA are widely used as miRNA mimics [40].

Unlike RNAi, RNA activation (RNAa) is a process where dsRNA triggers gene production by targeting promoter sequences [41]. Small activating RNAs (saRNAs) are synthesized using homologous sequences close or within gene promoters, which can trigger RNAa. Similar to miRNA-like target recognition, saRNAs actions depend on the AGO2 protein. In the nucleus, AGO2–saRNA uses the “seed” region to basepair with sequences inside the chromatin-bound RNA transcripts or complementary DNA [4143]. Besides saRNA and AGO2, recent research found that RNA-induced transcriptional activation (RITA) complex also contains RHA and CTR9 [44]. saRNA can alleviate the downregulation of silent tumor suppressor genes (like p21) or other typical dysregulated genes (like E-cadherin) and thus may promote the development of dsRNA-based therapeutics for cancer and other disorders [45].

CRISPR-based genome editing

The prokaryote-derived CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) systems have been widely used in mammalian cells and organisms to precisely edit genome sequence, resulting in irreversible knockout or knockin of a target gene [46]. Mechanistically, this system relies on a designed guide RNA (gRNA) and an RNA-guided Cas nuclease. The gRNA forms the Cas-gRNA ribonucleoprotein complex by binding to Cas. The complex recognizes a protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) element and a 20-nucleotide sequence in the target sequence. The Cas nuclease then cleaves the dsDNA or an ssRNA at the specific site for efficient genome editing [47]. Initial successes have enhanced the development of new methods for targeting and manipulating nucleic acids, such as Cas9 and Cas13 orthologues-derived methods [9]. The Cas9 system can target both dsDNA and ssRNA. The Cas9 target RNA of Streptococcus pyogenes (RCas9) requires a matching gRNA and complementary PAM-presenting oligonucleotide (PAMmer) [48] (Fig. 2C①). Cas9 orthologs (Cas9 of Campylobacter jejuni and Staphylococcus aureus) can cleave ssRNA without PAM [49] (Fig. 2C②). Cas13-mediated systems only target RNA, where a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) guides Cas13 to cleave specific RNA. Cas13a, Cas13b and Cas13d have been verified to interfere with and silence target RNA in mammal cells in vitro. CasRx (RfxCas13d), a subtype of Cas13d, showed the most potent RNA knockdown efficiency in HEK293T cells [50]. A protospacer flanking sequence (PFS) may be required to cut the target and non-target RNA molecules via two conserved Higher Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes Nucleotide-binding (HEPN) domains [51] (Fig. 2C③). Cas13d is a new PFS-independent Cas, and a non-catalytical variant of Cas13b that lacks endonuclease activity can induce the A-to-I base switch by fusing with the ADAR2 deaminase domain (ADAR2DD) [52] (Fig. 2C④).

Aptamer

Aptamers are single-stranded oligonucleotides with well-defined three-dimensional structures that specifically bind to and inhibit proteins [10]. They are also known as chemical antibodies due to their synthetic origins and similar action modes to antibodies. Systematic evolution of ligands through exponential enrichment (SELEX) is used for aptamer selection [53]. Aptamer-based therapeutics include: (1) Antagonist aptamers disrupt the interaction between disease-associated targets, such as protein-protein or receptor-ligand interactions. All the current aptamers in clinical trials use this strategy [54] (Fig. 2D①). (2) Cell type-specific aptamers serve as carriers to deliver other therapeutic agents to the target cells or tissues [55] (Fig. 2D②).

mRNAs and mRNA vaccine

The concept of mRNA-encoded drugs was discovered in the 1990s when direct injection of IVT mRNA into the mouse skeletal muscle showed encoded protein expression [56]. Preclinical research on IVT mRNA promotes the clinical development of mRNA-based vaccination against cancer and infectious disease [7]. Mechanistically, injected mRNA vaccines are delivered into the cytoplasm of the host cell (typically antigen-presenting cells (APCs)) and are translated into the targeted antigens. Subsequently, the major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) present the expressed antigens to the surface of APCs to activate B cell/antibody-mediated humoral immunity and CD4+ T/CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell-mediated immunity [57]. Besides, injected mRNA encoding immunostimulants (cytokines, chemokines, etc.) can promote APC maturation and activation, thus inducing a T-cell-mediated response and improving the immune tumor microenvironment [58] (Fig. 2E).

Overcoming challenges in the development of RNA therapeutics

The efficiency of RNA delivery into the cytoplasm through overcoming the extracellular and intracellular barriers remains critical for successful RNA therapy. Firstly, large, hydrophilic, negatively-charged properties prevent RNA from passively diffusing across the lipid bilayers. Beyond the physical barrier, RNA drugs must evade serum nucleases and scavenge macrophages within the reticuloendothelial system. Moreover, RNA drugs must pass through the extracellular matrix and across the cell membrane through receptor-mediated endocytosis. Escaping from the endosome and releasing RNAs into the cytoplasm in a non-toxic manner is a critical technical problem [59]. Therefore, various chemical modifications [60, 61] and the engineering of delivery formulations [62, 63] have been explored to solve challenges related to pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics.

Chemical modifications

Chemical modifications of ASOs and siRNAs

Chemical modification of the phosphate backbone, ribose ring, and 3′- and 5′-terminals can improve substrate specificity, nuclease resistance and delivery. Besides, it reduces toxicity and immunogenicity [64]. The modification of phosphorothioate (PS) backbones (Fig. 3A①) was the first and most commonly used chemical modification in ASOs. In this modification, one of the non-bridging oxygen atoms in the inter-nucleotide phosphate group is replaced with sulfur [65]. The PS backbone modification can facilitate cellular uptake and bioavailability in vivo via increased hydrophobicity, resistance to phosphodiesterases and avidly binding serum proteins [65]. The modifications of 2′ sugar at the ribose, including 2′-fluoro (F), 2′-methoxyethyl (MOE), 2′-O-methyl (O-Me) or 2′,4′-bicyclics with O-methylene bridge or locked nucleic acid (LNA), can improve the binding affinity and increase base-pairing melting temperature [66, 67] (Fig. 3A②). The 2′-F and 2′-O-Me modifications imitate the biophysical features of 2′-OH and can stabilize siRNAs against RNases while also preventing siRNAs activating innate immune receptors (TLR, MDA-5, and RIG-I). As a result, all therapeutic siRNAs in clinical trials have 2′-F or 2′-O-Me modifications [68]. LNA and its methylated derivative (“constrained ethyl” (cEt)) are widely used in ASOs, including gapmers, splice-switching ASOs, siLNA and antigene ASOs. These chimeric LNA or DNA oligonucleotides are more stable than isosequential PSs and 2’-O-Me gapmers [69]. Many 5′- or 3′-RNA conjugates (folate and N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc)) can also improve delivery. GalNAc is a high-affinity ligand for the hepatocyte-specific asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR), thereby significantly enhancing ASO and siRNA delivery to the liver [70] (Fig. 3A③). Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligonucleotide (PMO) [71] and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) [72] are more complex modifications that entirely alter the linking moieties while maintaining nucleobases for pairing (Fig. 3A④).

Fig. 3. Overcoming challenges in the development of RNA therapeutics.

Fig. 3

A Common chemical modifications. RNA-based drugs often have various chemical modifications, including 5′-and 3′-end conjugates, 2′-sugar substitution and internucleoside linkage modifications. B Nanocarriers delivery strategies. Five representative nanocarriers are shown: (①) Lipid nanoparticles encapsulating nucleic acids. (②) Cationic polymers electrostatically bind to negatively-charged nucleic acids to form polyplexes. (③) Engineered exosomes with aptamers or therapeutic RNAs on the outer surface. (④) Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle consisting of an inorganic core coated in densely packed oligonucleotides attached by chemical linkages. (⑤) Self-assembled DNA cage tetrahedron nanostructure. Oligonucleotide drugs can be incorporated into the design of the DNA cage itself. Additional targeting ligands and polyethylene glycol (PEG) can be further conjugated to the nanostructure. These nanocarriers can deliver RNA molecules through binding to the cell membrane, endocytosis, endosome escape and RNAs are released in the cytoplasm and translation to proteins or incorporated into corresponding ribonucleoprotein complexes to silence target transcripts.

Chemical modifications of mRNA, CRISPR-Cas guide RNAs, and aptamer

IVT mRNA is an ssRNA containing a 5′ cap structure, an ORF, flanking 5′ and 3′ UTRs and a 3′ poly (A) tail [73]. The optimization of mRNA vaccines often starts from these five structures through sequence optimization, nucleoside modification or sequence substitution of UTRs to enhance RNAs’ translational ability [74]. Various chemical modification nucleosides, including pseudouridine (Ψ), N1-methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ), 5-methylcytidine (m5C), 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-methyluridine (m5U) and 2-thiouridine (s2U) have been introduced into mRNA to minimize the innate immune response triggered by IVT mRNAs [75, 76].

Despite their robustness and simplicity, therapeutic use of CRISPR systems has many obstacles, including effective delivery, detectable off-target effects, potential immunogenicity, etc. Chemical modification patterns used in ASOs and siRNAs can be applied to gRNA and Cas9 mRNA [77]. For instance, chemical modifications containing 2′- O-M -3′PS (MS), 2′-O-M, or 2′-OM- 3′thioPACE (MSP) can be integrated into single-gRNAs (sgRNAs) at three terminal nucleotides on both the 5′ and 3′ ends to improve genome editing efficiency in human primary T cells and CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells [78]. The ribose-phosphate backbone of gRNAs with 2′-OM-3′-phosphonoacetate (MP) modification can significantly minimize off-target cleavage while maintaining strong on-target performance [79]. The 5′-H group modification of sgRNAs can be highly active and evade innate immune responses [80]. Incorporating bridging nucleic acids (2′,4′-BNANC[N-Me]) and LNA at particular sites in crRNA can significantly reduce off-target DNA cleavage by Cas9 [81]. The chemical modification of IVT mRNA can be used on Cas9 mRNA.

Like ASOs and siRNAs, versatile chemical modifications and conjugations can enhance the pharmacokinetic features of RNA aptamers [82]. Most aptamers in the clinical trials are chemically modified using 5′-end polyethylene glycol(PEG)ylation (for resisting renal clearance) [83], 3′end-capping strategy with inverted thymidine [84], and 2′-substitutions on the sugar ring (for preventing nuclease degradation). PS linkage modification can also optimize the properties of aptamers by improving target binding affinity [85].

Delivery formulation with nanocarriers

Developing an effective carrier to protect the carried RNA from the harmful physiological environment is necessary since RNAs have substantial negative charges and chemical modifications. Advances in nanotechnology and materials science offer advantages and potential solutions to the challenges of oligonucleotide drug delivery, especially for the requirements of intracellular delivery across biological barriers and membranes. Key benefits of nanoparticle drug delivery systems include custom optimization of nanoparticle biophysics (e.g., size, shape, and chemical/material composition) and biological properties (e.g., targeting ligand functionalization), allowing for a high degree of customization delivery platform. Here we introduced two dominant delivery approaches—lipid nanoparticles and cationic polymer-based polyplexes, and three emerging novel nanocarriers. We summarize the representation of RNA therapeutics delivery as shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Delivery method for RNA-based therapeutics.

Delivery method Composition Payload Example Advantage Limitation References
Lipid nanoparticles DLin-MC3-DMA (MC3) siRNA siRNA drug (Patisiran) Increased half life; protection from nucleases acids Elevated risk of immunotoxicity and immunogenicity [8689, 9395, 147, 148]
ALC-0315 mRNA, gRNA SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) Facilitate the endosomal escape of RNA molecules;increase in protein expression or immune responses in mice compared to MC3
SM-102 donor RNA SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273)
Cationic polymer-based polyplexes Polyethyleneimine (PEI) mRNA, siRNA, miRNA, gRNA SiG12D LODER; CRM197-PEG-PEI-based complexes High charge density and pH buffer capacity Potential toxicity and plasma instability [9698, 136]
Chitosan mRNA, siRNA, (DNA) siRNA loaded chitosan lactate nanoparticles (CL-TAT-HA) Low toxicity, biodegradability, biocompatibility, and permeability-enhancing Low transfection efficiency [99]
Cyclodextrin polymer (CDP) siRNA CALAA-01 [100, 101]
Poly(β-amino esters) (PBAEs) mRNA, gRNA, donor RNA HPV16 E7-targeting CRISPR/short hairpin RNA (shRNA) Low toxicity Low charge density [102]
Exosomes Derived sources: mesenchymal stem cells miRNA, siRNA, mRNA, other ncRNAs miR-124; KRAS G12D siRNA With minimal immune clearance and adverse effects [105, 106]
Spherical nucleic acids AuNP, quantum dots (QDs), SiO2, Ag, Fe3O4, mRNA, siRNA, gRNA, donor RNA NU-0129 (Bcl2Like12 (Bcl2L12) siRNA) Show rapid cellular uptake kinetics and intracellular transport; induce a negligible immune response. [107, 109, 110]
AST-005 (inhibiting TNF-α mRNA via ASOs); XCUR17 (interleukin-17 receptor-α through ASOs)
DNA nanostructures ASOs, siRNAs, aptamers, CRISPR-Cas9 AS1411 aptamers The object’s size, shape and plasticity can be fine-tuned Enzymatic hydrolysis, low cellular uptake, immune cell recognition and degradation, and unclear biodistribution profiles [111114, 117]

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs)

LNPs are the most widely used carriers to deliver oligonucleotide drugs [86, 87]. LNPs consist of ionizable cationic lipids, cholesterol, phospholipids and PEG-lipids (Fig. 3B①). Ionizable cationic lipids are the core components. Cationic lipids form “lipoplexes” by electrostatically binding to negatively-charged nucleic acids, which have been widely used in vitro for nucleic acid transfections (e.g., Lipofectamine™ RNAiMAX transfection reagents). Helper lipids, phospholipids and cholesterol promote formulation stability and delivery efficiency [88]. PEG-lipid can control particle size, prevent particle aggregation, and lengthen in vivo circulation lifetimes [89]. Other reviews have comprehensively discussed the advanced formulation of LNPs’ optimization characteristics and production methods [90].

Using the LNP-mediated siRNA delivery as an example [91] (Fig. 3B). The acid dissociation constant (pKa) determines the nanoparticles’ ionization behavior and surface charge, thereby influencing the delivery process. Firstly, positively charged LNPs prevent anionic RNAs from nucleases by coating RNAs and help RNAs across the cell membrane through receptor-mediated endocytosis. After entering the cells, the charges on the nanoparticle increase as the pH decrease (from 7 to 5.5) during endosomal maturation. Nanoparticles with a pKa in this range are protonated and create a buffering capacity. The buffering capacity of nanoparticles and/or membrane destabilization causes osmotic swelling and endosome breaking. The charges on nanoparticles decrease in the cytosol and weaken the binding to siRNAs [92]. The siRNAs then escape from endosomes into the cytosol, the critical rate-limiting step for its delivery. As a result, siRNAs cleave target RNAs by associating with the RISC. Other RNA entities may be translated to proteins or translocated in the nucleus. Therefore, optimizing LNPs’ pKa dramatically increases the delivery efficiency of RNA drugs. Besides, LNP-loaded RNA entities may be safely and effectively delivered to specific cells, organs, and tissues using the emerging advanced technologies. The branched-tail LNP can sufficiently co-deliver three distinct mRNAs in vivo and are not immunogenic or toxic to the liver [93]. The engineered-ionizable LNP has been developed for selective delivery of RNA into various liver cells [94]. The selective organ targeting (SORT) technique could specifically target the liver and extrahepatic tissues (lung and spleen) by adding a SORT molecule into LNP. This technique enables mRNA delivery and CRISPR-Cas gene editing in specific tissues [95]. Therefore, LNP-based gene therapies can treat hepatic diseases and other rare diseases.

Cationic polymer-based polyplexes

Polyplexes are standard formulations used for nucleic acid delivery. They are spontaneously formed by electrostatic interactions between cationic polymers and negatively-charged nucleic acids (Fig. 3B②). The polyethyleneimine (PEI) polymer family is the most widely studied polymeric material for nucleic acid delivery. They consist of linear or branched polycations that can form nanoscale complexes with miRNA or siRNA, thus leading to RNA protection and cellular delivery. A commercially available linear PEI derivative, jetPEI™, is widely used for DNA, siRNA and mRNA transfection. Besides, transforming RNA vaccines from PEI functionalized graphene oxide hydrogel in situ has been used for cancer immunotherapy effectively [96]. Targeted CRM197-PEG-PEI-based complexes for siRNA delivery in vivo show therapeutic effects by knockdown of growth factor pleiotrophin in glioblastoma [97]. However, PEI is relatively cytotoxic and not degradable [98]. Chitosan is a biopolymer found in the exoskeleton of crustaceans. Chitosan and its variants have been developed for DNA and siRNA delivery due to their biodegradability, biocompatibility and permeability-enhancing properties. However, the low transfection efficiency limits their clinical application [99]. Chitosan grafted PEI has been synthesized with increased transfection efficiency and lower toxicity [98]. Cyclodextrin polymer (CDP)-based nanoparticles were the first targeted nanoparticulate siRNA delivery system, which enters clinical trials for cancer. The self-assembling, CDP-based nanoparticle (denoted as CALAA-01) targets the ribonucleotide reductase M2 mRNA in patients with solid cancers [100, 101]. Other polymers like poly(β-amino esters) (PBAEs) [102] and polyaspartamides [103] are also used in nucleic acid delivery. However, there have been no polyplexes nanoparticles for RNA delivery approved. Therefore, improved strategies are required for producing scalable cationic polymer-based polyplexes with high target specificity and less toxic or immunogenic.

Emerging novel approaches-exosomes, spherical nucleic acids (SNAs), and DNA nanostructures

Exosomes are lipid membrane-enclosed vesicles with a diameter ranging from 40 to 160 nm (Fig. 3B③). They are found in all body fluids and are secreted by most cells. Exosomes are crucial intercellular communication mediators influencing many cell biology processes [104]. They can transport bioactive constituents and overcome biological barriers (blood–brain barrier). As a result, exosomes have attracted much attention as potential delivery vehicles for therapeutic agents. Engineered exosomes can deliver different RNA species with minimal immune clearance and adverse effects [105, 106].

SNAs are densely packed, radially oriented nucleic acids in the outer layer and covalently bond to an inorganic nanoparticle core. Gold nanoparticles (10–15 nm) are the most commonly used SNA cores. Alkyl thiol or cyclic disulfide chemical tethering groups are used to attach nucleic acids to the core surface. A recognition sequence (15–25 nt) is complementary to the target sequence, and a spacer (10 nt) connects the nanoparticle surface with the recognition sequence [107] (Fig. 3B④). SNAs can effectively deliver nucleic acid because: (1) they show rapid cellular uptake kinetics and intracellular transport. Their 3D structure can be recognized by class A scavenger receptors. Then, the proximity of SNAs, class A scavenger receptors and lipid-raft microdomains allow SNAs to be rapidly internalized through endocytosis in a lipid-raft-dependent and caveolae-mediated manner [108]. (2) they induce a negligible immune response. The high density of nucleic acids at the surface of SNAs inhibits nucleases-mediated degradation. Therefore, they can enter almost any cell type and various biological barriers (skin, tumor, and blood–brain barrier) without using transfection agents. Delivery of SNAs by exosomes, modification of the oligonucleotide sugar backbone or PEGylation of nanoparticles could further enhance the effectiveness of SNAs [107]. Exicure, Inc. has developed SNA therapeutic platforms with four SNA-loaded drugs currently in clinical trials. Systematic delivery of SNAs carrying Bcl2Like12 (Bcl2L12) siRNA (NU-0129) can act as a brain-penetrant precision therapeutic strategy for intracerebral glioblastoma multiforme treatment [109]. AST-005 can treat psoriatic lesions by inhibiting TNF-α mRNA via ASOs. XCUR17 can target interleukin-17 receptor-α through ASOs for treating psoriasis micro plaques. ST-008, TLR9 agonist SNA, combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, are used for immuno-oncology treatments [110].

DNA-based nanostructures are also widely used as delivery vehicles (Fig. 3B⑤). The self-assembly features of DNA allow it to fold into user-defined shapes through sequence-complementary domain hybridization. As a result, the object’s size can be precisely controlled at the nanometer scale, and the object’s shape and plasticity can be fine-tuned [111]. DNA nanostructures deliver RNA by incorporating ASOs or siRNAs on the structure surface [112]. AS1411 aptamers can also be inserted into DNA pyramids to promote intracellular uptake and nuclease degradation resistance [113]. The yarn-like DNA nanoclew can deliver CRISPR-Cas9 through rolling circle amplification and base-pairing with the Cas9/sgRNA complex [114]. Moreover, cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) oligonucleotides can target tissue macrophages when incorporated into DNA nanotubes by enhancing macrophage immunostimulation [115, 116]. However, the high costs of DNA and the high error rate of self-assembly limit the application of DNA nanostructures in emerging complex structures [117].

Application

RNA-based therapeutics were firstly adopted for diseases with clear rationales, such as oncology, neurological disorders and infectious diseases. Recent advancements in RNA technologies have led to the approval of eight ASOs, three siRNAs, and two mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 under the Emergency Use Authorization scheme (Table 2). Besides, other medicines are currently undergoing preclinical or clinical trials. Moreover, more advanced RNA-based therapeutics have been developed recently.

Table 2.

RNA-based drugs with either FDA approval or in late phase 3 clinical trials.

RNA class Drug Alternative name Sponsor Indication Target gene Target organ Chemical modifications or delivery method Administration route Updated states Comments References
ASO Fomivirsen Vitravene, ISIS 2922 Ionis Pharmaceuticals Cytomegalovirus Retinitis, HIV Infections Immediate early region 2 (IE2) mRNA Eye 2′-H Intravitreal

Completed

NCT00002187,

NCT00002355

The first FDA-approved ASO medication (1998),

withdrawal in Europe and USA in 2002

[118, 119]
Mipomersen Kynamro™, ISIS 301012 Kastle and IonisTherapeutics Hypercholesterolemia, Atherosclerosis, Coronary Artery Disease Apolipoprotein B (ApoB) mRNA Liver 2′-MOE Subcutaneous

Completed

NCT01598948

NCT00607373

NCT01475825

NCT00770146

NCT00694109

NCT00794664

NCT00706849

The second-generation of ASOs

(“Gapmers” ASO)

[120]
Inotersen ISIS 420915, Tegsedi, AKCEA-TTR-LRx Ionis Pharmaceuticals Hereditary ATTR Amyloidosis (hATTR) Hepatic transthyretin (TTR) mRNA Liver 2′-MOE Subcutaneous

Completed

NCT01737398

Nusinersen ISIS 396443, Sprinraza, IONIS-SMN Rx, BIIB058 Ionis Pharmaceuticals and Biogen Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) Survival of motor neuron 2(SMN2) pre-mRNA splicing (exon 7 inclusion) Central nervous system 2′-MOE, Fully modified Intrathecal

Completed

NCT02292537

Approved in 2016 [18, 121]
Eteplirsen AVI-4658, EXONDYS 51® Sarepta Therapeutics Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) DMD pre-mRNA splicing (exon 51 skipping) Muscule 2′-MOE, PMO Intravenous

Completed

NCT02255552

The third-generation of ASO medications with advanced chemical modifications [17, 121]
Golodirsen SRP-4053,Vyondys 53™ Sarepta Therapeutics Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) DMD pre-mRNA splicing (exon 53 skipping) Muscle 2′-MOE, PMO Intravenous

Recruiting

NCT02500381

[122]
Viltolarsen Viltepso, NS-065, NCNP-01 NS Pharma Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) DMD pre-mRNA splicing (exon 53 skipping) Muscle 2′-MOE, PMO Intravenous

Recruiting

NCT04768062

NCT04687020

NCT04060199

[123]
Casimersen SRP-4045, Amondys 45™ Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) DMD pre-mRNA splicing (exon 45 skipping) Muscle PMO Intravenous

Recruiting

NCT03532542

NCT02500381

[124]
RNAi Patisiran ALN-TTR02, ONPATTRO™ Alnylam Pharmaceuticals hATTR TTR mRNA Liver PS, 2′-O-Me, 2′-F (LNP) Intravenous

NCT03862807,

NCT01960348

The first siRNA drug approved by FDA (2018) [129]
Givosiran ALN-AS1, GIVLAARI Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Acute Hepatic Porphyria Aminolevulinate synthase 1(ALAS1) mRNA Liver PS, 2′-O-Me, 2′-F GalNAc Subcutaneous NCT03338816 The second siRNA drug approved by FDA (2019) [134]
Lumasiran ALN-GO1, OXLUMO Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Primary Hyperoxaluria Type 1 (PH1) Hydroxyacid oxidase 1 (HAO1) mRNA Liver PS, 2′-O-Me, 2′-F GalNAc Subcutaneous

Phae III active;

NCT03905694 NCT03681184 NCT04152200

The third siRNA drug approved by FDA (2020) [135]
Inclisiran ALN-PCSSC, LEQVIO Alnylam and Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Hypercholesterolemia, Atherosclerotic

Cardiovascular disease, Renal impairment

Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9

(PCSK9) mRNA

Liver PS, 2′-O-Me, 2′-F GalNAc Subcutaneous Phase III completed; NCT03399370 NCT03400800 NCT03397121 Expand siRNA’s clinical portfolio beyond just orphan diseases.Provide sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels with infrequent dosing (every 6 months).
Vutrisiran ALN-TTRSC02 Alnylam Pharmaceuticals hATTR TTR mRNA Liver PS, 2′-O-Me, 2′-F GalNAc Subcutaneous

Phae III active;

NCT04153149

NCT03759379

May prove to be a more clinically utilize, effective

treatment option for hATTR than patisira

Fitusiran ALN-AT3SC Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi Genzyme Hemophilia A / B Antithrombin mRNA Blood PS, 2′-O-Me, 2′-F GalNAc Subcutaneous Phase III completed; NCT03974113 NCT03417102
Nedosiran DCR-PHXC Dicerna Pharmaceuticals Primary Hyperoxaluria Hepatic lactate dehydrogenase mRNA Liver GalNAc Subcutaneous

Phase III enrolling by invitation;

NCT04042402

Compare with Lumasiran,it will have a potentially wider scope, since it is not limited to just PH1 patients.
Teprasiran QPI-1002 Quark Pharmaceuticals Cardiac surgery p53 mRNA Kidney 2′-O-Me Intravenous

Phase III completed;

NCT02610296

The first systemically administered siRNA drug to

enter human clinical trials

QPI-1007 Quark Pharmaceuticals Primary angle-closure glaucoma Caspase 2 mRNA Eye 2′-O-Me Intravitreal

Phase II/III terminated:

NCT02341560

Tivanisiran SYL-1001 Sylentis, S.A. Dry eye disease Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1 (TRPV1) mRNA Eye Unmodified Topical eye drop

Phase III completed;

NCT03108664

Aptamer Pegaptanib Macugen® Pfizer Diabetic Macular Edema VEGF (165 isoform) Eye Pegylated, all PO, 2′-F, and 2′-OMe; G and A methylated Intravitreal injection

Phase IV Completed;

NCT01486238

NCT01486238

NCT00406107

NCT00324116

[146]
mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 Comirnaty® BioNTech and Pfizer Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein Immune system Nucleoside-modifed, lipid nanoparticle-formulated Interventional

Completed

NCT04816669

NCT04887948

NCT04713553

NCT05030974

The first two FDA-approved SARS-CoV-2 vaccines with >94% effectiveness in phase III clinical trial [147]
mRNA-1273 Moderna Therapeutics COVID-19 Encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein Immune system Lipid nanoparticle-formulated Interventional

Completed

NCT05030974

[148]

Performance of ASOs in clinical trials

Out of the 100 phase I trials performed on ASO-based therapies, a quarter has entered phase II/III trials in the last 5 years for treating rare and common diseases, such as orphan genetic alterations and cancer [11].

Fomivirsen is the first FDA-approved ASO drug for treating cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMV) in patients with AIDS [118]. This PS ASO complementary to human CMV immediate-early mRNA inhibits viral protein synthesis and interrupts viral replication [119]. However, since the introduction of highly active anti-retroviral therapy, cases of CMV have significantly reduced. Therefore, fomivirsen was withdrawn from the market in Europe and USA in 2002. Mipomersen and inotersen are second-generation ASO drugs called “Gapmers” or chimeric ASOs. Mipomersen effectively degrades apolipoprotein B (ApoB) mRNA. Likewise, inotersen mediates RNase H1-mediated degradation of hepatic transthyretin (TTR) mRNAs to reduce TTR protein synthesis and serum TTR levels [120]. Two splice-modulating ASOs (nusinersen and eteplirsen) were approved in 2016 for treating splicing defects [121]. Nusinersen is the first splicing-correcting ASOs approved for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) treatment. The 2′-MOE ASO promotes exon 7 inclusion and increases the expression of SMN protein by binding to the intronic splicing inhibitor in intron 7 [18]. Eteplirsen is another splice-modulating oligonucleotide used to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) patients. It hybridizes to a splicing enhancer sequence in exon 51 that causes the spliceosome ignores exon 51 and directly read exon 52 in the frame, thus producing shorter yet semi‐functional dystrophin proteins [17]. Since eteplirsen is suitable for only 13–14% of DMD patients with specific mutations, golodirsen [122], viltolarsen [123], and casimersen [124] have been approved for the treatment of DMD with particular splicing defects. These drugs induce exon 53 or 45 skippings, thereby promoting the expression of dystrophin proteins. Together with eteplirsen, these four drugs are third-generation ASO drugs belonging to PMOs sophisticated chemical modifications. Because of the urgency of the patient’s clinical situation and ASO medications may be modified in a sequence-specific manner, patient-customized oligonucleotide treatment has been developed. Milasen is the first patient-customized ASO for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 7 disease (a fatal neurodegenerative disease). It showed an acceptable side-effect during the therapy [125].

Several clinical trials are being conducted to test the efficacy of ribozymes in the treatment of solid tumors, HIV and other diseases [126]. RPI.4610 (Angiozyme) is a ribozyme that inhibits angiogenesis by targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor one (VEGFR1) mRNA. However, the poor efficacy prevents its clinical development [127]. OZ1 is a tat-vpr-specific anti-HIV ribozyme that increases the number of CD4+ lymphocytes when administered to autologous CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells. This suggests that cell-mediated delivery of genes is a safe therapeutic approach for HIV patients and is likely to be a conventional treatment for HIV [128]. Although the results obtained in the initial clinical trials were positive, further investigation is required to determine the stability, in vivo activity, tissue-specific delivery, and long-term expression of ribozymes [126].

RNAi-based therapy

Patisiran and GalNAc-conjugated siRNAs

Three siRNA drugs (patisiran, givosiran, and lumasiran) have been approved by FDA to date, while seven siRNA candidates (inclisiran, vutrisiran, fitusiran, cosdosiran, nedosiran, tivanisiran and teprasiran) are undergoing Phase III clinical trials.

Patisiran is the first FDA-approved RNAi-based drug for treating hTTR with polyneuropathy, ushering in a booming new era for RNAi therapeutics [129]. Similar to inotersen [130], the patisiran siRNA (ALN-18328) silences all potential mRNAs with coding region mutations by targeting the 3′ UTR of the TTR gene [129]. Alnylam developed the stabilization chemistry-GalNAc delivery platform to improve the clinical efficacy of siRNA medications. To date, approximately one-third of RNAi drugs in clinical trials are GalNAc-conjugated siRNAs. Revusiran was the first GalNAc–siRNA drug that significantly increased asialoglycoprotein receptors uptake for hepatic delivery [131]. Unfortunately, it was discontinued due to an imbalance in fatalities in the “ENDEAVOUR” phase III clinical trial (NCT02319005) [132]. Despite the failure of revusiran, Alnylam has continued to develop GalNAc–siRNA conjugates for therapeutic usage by strategically positioning chemical modifications within the siRNA that can impart extra stabilization against nuclease activity [133]. Givosiran [134] and Lumasiran [135], the second and third siRNA drugs approved by the FDA, have demonstrated that these GalNAc-conjugated, subcutaneously delivered siRNAs are well tolerated, significantly decrease the target mRNA levels, and have a low hazard profile. Other prominent companies have also utilized fully chemically modified, metabolically stabilized RNAi with varying secondary structures and chemical modification patterns. The RNAi therapy extends beyond the liver to other organs and targets various diseases ranging from rare to common diseases affecting larger patient populations. Quark Pharmaceuticals, for instance, has developed drugs to treat kidney injury (QPI-1002) and eye diseases (QPI-1007). Currently, the pharmaceutical industry’s focus has shifted swiftly toward RNAi drugs for cancer treatment. SiG12D LODER (Local Drug EluteR) is a biodegradable polymeric matrix that contains KRASG12D siRNA (siG12D) drug for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NCT01188785) [136]. Additionally, TKM-080301(Plk1 inhibitor) has been developed for hepatocellular carcinoma and Atu027 (against protein kinase N3) for advanced solid tumors [137].

Beyond siRNA

miRNA inhibitors (Anti-miRs) and miRNA mimics can be used to down- or upregulate miRNAs. Miravirsen (SPC3649) and RG-101are anti-miRs targeting miR-122 for treating hepatitis C virus infection [138]. The miR-34a mimic, MRX34, is the first cancer-targeted miRNA drug [139]. However, none of them are currently in clinical usage

MTL-CEBPA is the first saRNA in clinical trials. It regulates hepatic and myeloid functions, as well as numerous oncogenic processes by upregulating the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBP-α) [140, 141]. The encouraging results promote the establishment of a clinical trial combining MTL-CEBPA with an anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor or radiofrequency ablation to treat solid tumors [142].

CRISPR/Cas-based genome therapy

The first human clinical trial on applying CRISPR/Cas gene editing involved using ex vivo Cas9 to knockout PD-1 in autologous T cells (NCT03399448) [143]. In addition, β-thalassemia was the first human trial applying CRISPR/Cas to genetic diseases (NCT03655678). The first clinical trial using CRISPR/Cas genome editing to treat retinal defects was EDIT-101 (NCT03872479) [144]. These CRISPR/Cas-based clinical trials have provided a foundation for further genome-editing clinical trials on zinc-finger nucleases [145].

Aptamer

Pegaptanib (Macugen) is the first FDA-approval aptamer drug targeting VEGF to treat age-related macular degeneration [146]. Numerous other aptamers are in the preclinical or clinical development pipeline for possible treatment of diseases, such as visual disorders, coagulation, oncology and inflammation [54].

mRNA vaccine

In the last few decades, mRNA vaccines have gained widespread applications. In 2020, the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) stimulated the most rapid development of mRNA vaccines in history.

Vaccines targeting infectious diseases represent the most advanced application of mRNA therapies. So far, mRNA vaccines for various infectious diseases, including influenza, Zika, and respiratory syncytial virus, have been developed [57]. During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, mRNA-based vaccines have proven effective against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®) [147] and the Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273 [148] were the first two FDA-approved SARS-CoV-2 vaccines with >94% effectiveness in phase III clinical trial. Both vaccines employ LNPs formulated using ionizable lipid and a nucleoside-modified mRNA. All uridines in the mRNA are substituted with N1-methylpseudouridine to improve mRNA translation. The mRNA sequence encodes the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with two proline alterations that give the protein a prefusion shape [149].

The application of mRNA-based cancer vaccines has been recently reviewed [58, 73, 150, 151]. To date, over 20 mRNA-based vaccines have undergone clinical trials as potential preventive strategies for solid tumors, such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and colorectal carcinoma. In most clinical trials, mRNA cancer vaccines are co-administered with checkpoint modulators (PD-1, CTLA-4, and TIM3) or cytokine cocktails to enhance antitumor efficacy.

More recent advances for RNA-based therapies

Apart from miRNA antagomir and miRNA mimic, artificial circular RNA (circRNA) sponges (circmiRs) are promising therapeutic miRNA antagonists. circRNAs are a subclass of ncRNAs that exist as continuous loop RNAs due to the lack of free 3′ and 5′ ends. They are resistant to nuclease degradation and more stable than linear RNAs. The most frequently described function of circRNAs is acting as miRNA sponges. These circRNAs contain multiple miRNA-binding sites for miRNAs binding, preventing the interaction between miRNA and their canonical mRNA target gene [152, 153]. Recent findings reveal that engineered circmiRs are efficient sponges of miR-132 and −212 to attenuate pressure overload-induced hypertrophy in vivo in a mouse model. These circmiRs also show greater in vitro efficacy than the current gold standard antagomiRs in inhibiting miRNA function [154]. Besides, circRNAs with minimized immunogenicity are potent protein kinase R inhibitors, which efficiently suppress protein kinase R activation 103- to 106-fold higher than reported chemical compounds (C16 and 2-AP) [155]. Moreover, circRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants elicit a higher and more durable immune response [156]. In fact, increasing research has focused on noncoding RNA therapeutics, which have been widely reviewed [157159].

Taken research advance of Cas13d mediated—genome therapy as another example. Cas13d has been shown to efficiently down-regulating cellular RNAs in mammalian cells in vitro [50]. The adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated delivery of CasRx and Pcsk9 sgRNAs into mouse liver has successfully decreased serum PCSK9 and serum cholesterol levels [160]. Besides, CasRx-mediated Vegfa knockdown in vivo could prevent the development of choroidal neovascularization in a mouse model of age-related macular degeneration [161]. The CasRx system-derived approach was more specific and efficient than RNAi-mediated gene knockdown. Therefore, CasRx-mediated therapy provides a robust method to silence genes in hepatocytes and other cells in vivo. Recently, it was proposed to be used for treating RNA virus infections (e.g., SARS-Cov-2).

Conclusion and future perspectives

Various RNA-based approaches have been applied to experiments and clinical trials. Commoditized ASOs, siRNAs, antagomirs and aptamers are widely used for cell and animal experiments. Several ASOs, siRNAs, aptamer and mRNA vaccines have been approved for clinical application. These approaches allow for the down- or up-regulation of specific mRNA expression and inhibition of ncRNA functions by targeting particular RNA sequences. However, the most significant obstacle preventing the widespread usage of RNA-based approaches is the difficulty of efficiently delivering such drugs to target organs and tissues apart from the liver. In addition, off-target binding [162], sequence-induced toxicity, and oversaturation of the endogenous RNA processing pathway [163] affect the effectiveness of RNA-based approaches.

Chemical modification is one of the most promising strategies for delivering RNA-based drugs. Modification of the nucleic acid backbone, ribose ring, and nucleobase itself has been widely used to optimize drug-like characteristics for enhanced delivery. For example, extensive chemical modifications allow the delivery of gapmer ASOs to various tissues without an extra delivery agent. To date, eight of the ten approved oligonucleotide treatments are applied without an additional delivery vehicle. However, some unnatural nucleotides may be harmful. For instance, LNA-modified nucleic acids were found to cause severe hepatotoxicity [164]. Therefore, bioengineered RNAi agents (BERAs), a newly-developed in vivo RNA agent carrying no or minimal post-transcriptional modifications, have shown good application prospects [165].

Developing nanocarriers for RNA drug delivery provides excellent hepatic transport. Non-liver systemically administered nanomedicines require further investigation. Advances in imaging techniques (e.g., electron microscopy, super-resolution fluorescence microscopy, single-particle tracking 3, etc.) [166] and omics-based approaches [167] have allowed scientists to investigate intracellular delivery processes, thereby boosting the innovation of nanoformulations and rational design of advanced delivery vehicles.

Apart from the sequence-based method, small-molecule-based therapy to target RNA would be preferred in many cases [168]. Evrysdi (risdiplam) is the first FDA-approved orally bioavailable small-molecule inhibitor targeting SMN2 pre-messenger RNA splicing. It is synthesized efficiently and can be easily administered [169]. Tutorials about generating RNA-targeted small molecules have been discussed in other reviews [5, 170].

In summary, combining RNA chemical modifications and conjugation with nanocarrier systems can improve the efficiency of RNA drug delivery. Further research on RNA-based therapeutics, including RNA molecules as therapeutic drugs and targeting RNA with small molecules, will lead to more RNA-based therapeutics for patient treatment.

Author contributions

HJ, XW, and YZ conceptualized the paper; YZ performed the literature collection and wrote the paper; LZ and HJ edited and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) (Grant Numbers: 81903061 and 91740106).

Data availability

All relevant data are included in this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Edited by Professor Francesca Pentimalli

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Zamecnik PC, Stephenson ML. Inhibition of Rous sarcoma virus replication and cell transformation by a specific oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1978;75:280–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.1.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elbashir SM, Harborth J, Lendeckel W, Yalcin A, Weber K, Tuschl T. Duplexes of 21-nucleotide RNAs mediate RNA interference in cultured mammalian cells. Nature. 2001;411:494–8. doi: 10.1038/35078107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang F, Zuroske T, Watts JK. RNA therapeutics on the rise. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:441–2. doi: 10.1038/d41573-020-00078-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crooke ST, Witztum JL, Bennett CF, Baker BF. RNA-targeted therapeutics. Cell Metab. 2018;27:714–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Falese J, Donlic A, Hargrove A. Targeting RNA with small molecules: from fundamental principles towards the clinic. Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:2224–43. doi: 10.1039/D0CS01261K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dixon SJ, Stockwell BR. Identifying druggable disease-modifying gene products. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2009;13:549–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sahin U, Karikó K, Türeci Ö. mRNA-based therapeutics−developing a new class of drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:759–80. doi: 10.1038/nrd4278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaufmann KB, Büning H, Galy A, Schambach A, Grez M. Gene therapy on the move. EMBO Mol Med. 2013;5:1642–61. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201202287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang F, Wang L, Zou X, Duan S, Li Z, Deng Z, et al. Advances in CRISPR-Cas systems for RNA targeting, tracking and editing. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:708–29. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Adachi T, Nakamura Y. Aptamers: a review of their chemical properties and modifications for therapeutic application. Molecules. 2019;24:4229. doi: 10.3390/molecules24234229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crooke ST, Baker BF, Crooke RM, Liang XH. Antisense technology: an overview and prospectus. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:427–53. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00162-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liang XH, Sun H, Nichols JG, Crooke ST. RNase H1-dependent antisense oligonucleotides are robustly active in directing RNA cleavage in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Mol Ther. 2017;25:2075–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mulhbacher J, St-Pierre P, Lafontaine DA. Therapeutic applications of ribozymes and riboswitches. Curr Opin Pharm. 2010;10:551–6. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2010.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sullivan SM. Development of ribozymes for gene therapy. J Investig Dermatol. 1994;103(5 Suppl):85s–9s. doi: 10.1038/jid.1994.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Desterro J, Bak-Gordon P, Carmo-Fonseca M. Targeting mRNA processing as an anticancer strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19:112–29. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0042-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li D, Mastaglia FL, Fletcher S, Wilton SD. Precision medicine through antisense oligonucleotide-mediated Exon skipping. Trends Pharm Sci. 2018;39:982–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nakamura A, Takeda S. Exon-skipping therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Lancet. 2011;378:546–7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Corey DR. Nusinersen, an antisense oligonucleotide drug for spinal muscular atrophy. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:497–9. doi: 10.1038/nn.4508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ward AJ, Norrbom M, Chun S, Bennett CF, Rigo F. Nonsense-mediated decay as a terminating mechanism for antisense oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:5871–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Melton DA. Injected anti-sense RNAs specifically block messenger RNA translation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1985;82:144–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.82.1.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baker BF, Lot SS, Kringel J, Cheng-Flournoy S, Villiet P, Sasmor HM, et al. Oligonucleotide-europium complex conjugate designed to cleave the 5’ cap structure of the ICAM-1 transcript potentiates antisense activity in cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:1547–51. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.6.1547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vickers TA, Wyatt JR, Burckin T, Bennett CF, Freier SM. Fully modified 2’ MOE oligonucleotides redirect polyadenylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:1293–9. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.6.1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liang XH, Shen W, Sun H, Migawa MT, Vickers TA, Crooke ST. Translation efficiency of mRNAs is increased by antisense oligonucleotides targeting upstream open reading frames. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:875–80. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liang XH, Sun H, Shen W, Wang S, Yao J, Migawa MT, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides targeting translation inhibitory elements in 5’ UTRs can selectively increase protein levels. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:9528–46. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Z, Rana TM. Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs: current status and future challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13:622–38. doi: 10.1038/nrd4359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Choi WY, Giraldez AJ, Schier AF. Target protectors reveal dampening and balancing of Nodal agonist and antagonist by miR-430. Science. 2007;318:271–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1147535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kim DH, Rossi JJ. Strategies for silencing human disease using RNA interference. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:173–84. doi: 10.1038/nrg2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fire A, Xu S, Montgomery MK, Kostas SA, Driver SE, Mello CC. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1998;391:806–11. doi: 10.1038/35888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Caplen NJ, Parrish S, Imani F, Fire A, Morgan RA. Specific inhibition of gene expression by small double-stranded RNAs in invertebrate and vertebrate systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:9742–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.171251798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Elbashir SM, Lendeckel W, Tuschl T. RNA interference is mediated by 21- and 22-nucleotide RNAs. Genes Dev. 2001;15:188–200. doi: 10.1101/gad.862301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Castanotto D, Rossi JJ. The promises and pitfalls of RNA-interference-based therapeutics. Nature. 2009;457:426–33. doi: 10.1038/nature07758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wilson RC, Doudna JA. Molecular mechanisms of RNA interference. Annu Rev Biophys. 2013;42:217–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-083012-130404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Matzke MA, Birchler JA. RNAi-mediated pathways in the nucleus. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:24–35. doi: 10.1038/nrg1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bartel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell. 2004;116:281–97. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Medley JC, Panzade G, Zinovyeva AY. microRNA strand selection: unwinding the rules. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Rna. 2021;12:e1627. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kim H, Kim J, Yu S, Lee YY, Park J, Choi RJ, et al. A mechanism for microRNA arm switching regulated by uridylation. Mol Cell. 2020;78:1224–36.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vasudevan S. Posttranscriptional upregulation by microRNAs. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2012;3:311–30. doi: 10.1002/wrna.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Long JM, Maloney B, Rogers JT, Lahiri DK. Novel upregulation of amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) by microRNA-346 via targeting of APP mRNA 5’-untranslated region: Implications in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:345–63. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0266-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ma F, Liu X, Li D, Wang P, Li N, Lu L, et al. MicroRNA-466l upregulates IL-10 expression in TLR-triggered macrophages by antagonizing RNA-binding protein tristetraprolin-mediated IL-10 mRNA degradation. J Immunol. 2010;184:6053–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rupaimoole R, Slack FJ. MicroRNA therapeutics: towards a new era for the management of cancer and other diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:203–22. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li LC, Okino ST, Zhao H, Pookot D, Place RF, Urakami S, et al. Small dsRNAs induce transcriptional activation in human cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17337–42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607015103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Janowski BA, Younger ST, Hardy DB, Ram R, Huffman KE, Corey DR. Activating gene expression in mammalian cells with promoter-targeted duplex RNAs. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:166–73. doi: 10.1038/nchembio860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Meng X, Jiang Q, Chang N, Wang X, Liu C, Xiong J, et al. Small activating RNA binds to the genomic target site in a seed-region-dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:2274–82. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Portnoy V, Lin SHS, Li KH, Burlingame A, Hu Z-H, Li H, et al. saRNA-guided Ago2 targets the RITA complex to promoters to stimulate transcription. Cell Res. 2016;26:320–35. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Tan CP, Sinigaglia L, Gomez V, Nicholls J, Habib NA. RNA activation-A novel approach to therapeutically upregulate gene transcription. Molecules. 2021;26:6530. doi: 10.3390/molecules26216530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pickar-Oliver A, Gersbach CA. The next generation of CRISPR-Cas technologies and applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20:490–507. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Doudna JA, Charpentier E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:1258096. doi: 10.1126/science.1258096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.O’Connell MR, Oakes BL, Sternberg SH, East-Seletsky A, Kaplan M, Doudna JA. Programmable RNA recognition and cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. Nature. 2014;516:263–6. doi: 10.1038/nature13769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Strutt SC, Torrez RM, Kaya E, Negrete OA, Doudna JA. RNA-dependent RNA targeting by CRISPR-Cas9. Elife. 2018;7:e32724. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Konermann S, Lotfy P, Brideau NJ, Oki J, Shokhirev MN, Hsu PD. Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR effectors. Cell. 2018;173:665–76.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Konermann S, Joung J, Slaymaker IM, Cox DB, et al. C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science. 2016;353:aaf5573. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cox DBT, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Franklin B, Kellner MJ, Joung J, et al. RNA editing with CRISPR-Cas13. Science. 2017;358:1019–27. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ellington AD, Szostak JW. Selection in vitro of single-stranded DNA molecules that fold into specific ligand-binding structures. Nature. 1992;355:850–2. doi: 10.1038/355850a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zhou J, Rossi J. Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: current potential and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:181–202. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhou J, Rossi JJ. Cell-type-specific, Aptamer-functionalized agents for targeted disease therapy. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2014;3:e169. doi: 10.1038/mtna.2014.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P, Chong W, Acsadi G, Jani A, et al. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science. 1990;247:1465–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1690918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chaudhary N, Weissman D, Whitehead KA. mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:817–38. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00283-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Beck JD, Reidenbach D, Salomon N, Sahin U, Türeci Ö, Vormehr M, et al. mRNA therapeutics in cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01348-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Dowdy SF. Overcoming cellular barriers for RNA therapeutics. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:222–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Khvorova A, Watts JK. The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:238–48. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bramsen JB, Kjems J. Development of therapeutic-grade small interfering RNAs by chemical engineering. Front Genet. 2012;3:154. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen X, Mangala LS, Rodriguez-Aguayo C, Kong X, Lopez-Berestein G, Sood AK. RNA interference-based therapy and its delivery systems. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018;37:107–24. doi: 10.1007/s10555-017-9717-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ho W, Zhang XQ, Xu X. Biomaterials in siRNA delivery: a comprehensive review. Adv Health Mater. 2016;5:2715–31. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wan WB, Seth PP. The medicinal chemistry of therapeutic oligonucleotides. J Med Chem. 2016;59:9645–67. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Eckstein F. Phosphorothioates, essential components of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2014;24:374–87. doi: 10.1089/nat.2014.0506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Prakash TP. An overview of sugar-modified oligonucleotides for antisense therapeutics. Chem Biodivers. 2011;8:1616–41. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201100081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dirin M, Winkler J. Influence of diverse chemical modifications on the ADME characteristics and toxicology of antisense oligonucleotides. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2013;13:875–88. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2013.774366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Setten RL, Rossi JJ, Han SP. The current state and future directions of RNAi-based therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:421–46. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0017-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kurreck J, Wyszko E, Gillen C, Erdmann VA. Design of antisense oligonucleotides stabilized by locked nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1911–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.9.1911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Winkler J. Oligonucleotide conjugates for therapeutic applications. Ther Deliv. 2013;4:791–809. doi: 10.4155/tde.13.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Iversen PL. Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers: favorable properties for sequence-specific gene inactivation. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2001;3:235–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nielsen PE. Gene targeting using peptide nucleic acid. Methods Mol Biol. 2005;288:343–58. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-823-4:343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wang Y, Zhang Z, Luo J, Han X, Wei Y, Wei X. mRNA vaccine: a potential therapeutic strategy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:33. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01311-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kon E, Elia U, Peer D. Principles for designing an optimal mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;73:329–36. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Karikó K, Muramatsu H, Welsh FA, Ludwig J, Kato H, Akira S, et al. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. Mol Ther. 2008;16:1833–40. doi: 10.1038/mt.2008.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kwon H, Kim M, Seo Y, Moon YS, Lee HJ, Lee K, et al. Emergence of synthetic mRNA: In vitro synthesis of mRNA and its applications in regenerative medicine. Biomaterials. 2018;156:172–93. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen Q, Zhang Y, Yin H. Recent advances in chemical modifications of guide RNA, mRNA and donor template for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;168:246–58. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hendel A, Bak RO, Clark JT, Kennedy AB, Ryan DE, Roy S, et al. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR-Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33:985–9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ryan DE, Taussig D, Steinfeld I, Phadnis SM, Lunstad BD, Singh M, et al. Improving CRISPR-Cas specificity with chemical modifications in single-guide RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:792–803. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kim S, Koo T, Jee HG, Cho HY, Lee G, Lim DG, et al. CRISPR RNAs trigger innate immune responses in human cells. Genome Res. 2018;28:367–73. doi: 10.1101/gr.231936.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Cromwell CR, Sung K, Park J, Krysler AR, Jovel J, Kim SK, et al. Incorporation of bridged nucleic acids into CRISPR RNAs improves Cas9 endonuclease specificity. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1448. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03927-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ni S, Yao H, Wang L, Lu J, Jiang F, Lu A, et al. Chemical modifications of nucleic acid aptamers for therapeutic purposes. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:1683. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Hoffmann S, Hoos J, Klussmann S, Vonhoff S. RNA aptamers and spiegelmers: synthesis, purification, and post-synthetic PEG conjugation. Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem. 2011;Chapter 4:Unit 4.46.1–30. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 84.Shi H, He X, Cui W, Wang K, Deng K, Li D, et al. Locked nucleic acid/DNA chimeric aptamer probe for tumor diagnosis with improved serum stability and extended imaging window in vivo. Anal Chim Acta. 2014;812:138–44. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Maier KE, Levy M. From selection hits to clinical leads: progress in aptamer discovery. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2016;5:16014. doi: 10.1038/mtm.2016.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wang Y, Miao L, Satterlee A, Huang L. Delivery of oligonucleotides with lipid nanoparticles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;87:68–80. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ozcan G, Ozpolat B, Coleman RL, Sood AK, Lopez-Berestein G. Preclinical and clinical development of siRNA-based therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;87:108–19. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Cheng X, Lee RJ. The role of helper lipids in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) designed for oligonucleotide delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;99:129–37. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2016.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Harvie P, Wong FM, Bally MB. Use of poly(ethylene glycol)-lipid conjugates to regulate the surface attributes and transfection activity of lipid-DNA particles. J Pharm Sci. 2000;89:652–63. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6017(200005)89:5<652::AID-JPS11>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Witzigmann D, Kulkarni JA, Leung J, Chen S, Cullis PR, van der Meel R. Lipid nanoparticle technology for therapeutic gene regulation in the liver. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;159:344–63. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Gilleron J, Querbes W, Zeigerer A, Borodovsky A, Marsico G, Schubert U, et al. Image-based analysis of lipid nanoparticle-mediated siRNA delivery, intracellular trafficking and endosomal escape. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:638–46. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Patel P, Ibrahim NM, Cheng K. The importance of apparent pKa in the development of nanoparticles encapsulating siRNA and mRNA. Trends Pharm Sci. 2021;42:448–60. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2021.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Hajj KA, Melamed JR, Chaudhary N, Lamson NG, Ball RL, Yerneni SS, et al. A potent branched-tail lipid nanoparticle enables multiplexed mRNA delivery and gene editing in vivo. Nano Lett. 2020;20:5167–75. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Kim M, Jeong M, Hur S, Cho Y, Park J, Jung H, et al. Engineered ionizable lipid nanoparticles for targeted delivery of RNA therapeutics into different types of cells in the liver. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabf4398. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf4398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Cheng Q, Wei T, Farbiak L, Johnson LT, Dilliard SA, Siegwart DJ. Selective organ targeting (SORT) nanoparticles for tissue-specific mRNA delivery and CRISPR-Cas gene editing. Nat Nanotechnol. 2020;15:313–20. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0669-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yin Y, Li X, Ma H, Zhang J, Yu D, Zhao R, et al. In situ transforming RNA nanovaccines from polyethylenimine functionalized graphene oxide hydrogel for durable cancer immunotherapy. Nano Lett. 2021;21:2224–31. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c05039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Höbel S, Appeldoorn CC, Gaillard PJ, Aigner A. Targeted CRM197-PEG-PEI/siRNA Complexes for Therapeutic RNAi in Glioblastoma. Pharmaceuticals. 2011;4:1591–606. doi: 10.3390/ph4121591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Pandey AP, Sawant KK. Polyethylenimine: a versatile, multifunctional non-viral vector for nucleic acid delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;68:904–18. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mao S, Sun W, Kissel T. Chitosan-based formulations for delivery of DNA and siRNA. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62:12–27. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2009.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Davis ME, Zuckerman JE, Choi CH, Seligson D, Tolcher A, Alabi CA, et al. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature. 2010;464:1067–70. doi: 10.1038/nature08956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Davis ME. The first targeted delivery of siRNA in humans via a self-assembling, cyclodextrin polymer-based nanoparticle: from concept to clinic. Mol Pharm. 2009;6:659–68. doi: 10.1021/mp900015y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Pollard C, Rejman J, De Haes W, Verrier B, Van Gulck E, Naessens T, et al. Type I IFN counteracts the induction of antigen-specific immune responses by lipid-based delivery of mRNA vaccines. Mol Ther. 2013;21:251–9. doi: 10.1038/mt.2012.202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Baba M, Itaka K, Kondo K, Yamasoba T, Kataoka K. Treatment of neurological disorders by introducing mRNA in vivo using polyplex nanomicelles. J Control Release. 2015;201:41–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Kalluri R, LeBleu VS. The biology, function, and biomedical applications of exosomes. Science. 2020;367:eaau6977. doi: 10.1126/science.aau6977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.El Andaloussi S, Lakhal S, Mäger I, Wood MJ. Exosomes for targeted siRNA delivery across biological barriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:391–7. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lee JJ, Lötvall JO. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2007;9:654–9. doi: 10.1038/ncb1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Mokhtarzadeh A, Vahidnezhad H, Youssefian L, Mosafer J, Baradaran B, Uitto J. Applications of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticles as delivery systems. Trends Mol Med. 2019;25:1066–79. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2019.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Choi CH, Hao L, Narayan SP, Auyeung E, Mirkin CA. Mechanism for the endocytosis of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:7625–30. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305804110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Jensen SA, Day ES, Ko CH, Hurley LA, Luciano JP, Kouri FM, et al. Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates as an RNAi-based therapy for glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:209ra152. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kapadia CH, Melamed JR, Day ES. Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticles: therapeutic potential. BioDrugs. 2018;32:297–309. doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-0290-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Linko V, Ora A, Kostiainen MA. DNA nanostructures as smart drug-delivery vehicles and molecular devices. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:586–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lee H, Lytton-Jean AK, Chen Y, Love KT, Park AI, Karagiannis ED, et al. Molecularly self-assembled nucleic acid nanoparticles for targeted in vivo siRNA delivery. Nat Nanotechnol. 2012;7:389–93. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2012.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Charoenphol P, Bermudez H. Aptamer-targeted DNA nanostructures for therapeutic delivery. Mol Pharm. 2014;11:1721–5. doi: 10.1021/mp500047b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sun W, Ji W, Hall JM, Hu Q, Wang C, Beisel CL, et al. Self-assembled DNA nanoclews for the efficient delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015;54:12029–33. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Sellner S, Kocabey S, Nekolla K, Krombach F, Liedl T, Rehberg M. DNA nanotubes as intracellular delivery vehicles in vivo. Biomaterials. 2015;53:453–63. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Mohri K, Nishikawa M, Takahashi N, Shiomi T, Matsuoka N, Ogawa K, et al. Design and development of nanosized DNA assemblies in polypod-like structures as efficient vehicles for immunostimulatory CpG motifs to immune cells. ACS Nano. 2012;6:5931–40. doi: 10.1021/nn300727j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Pinheiro AV, Han D, Shih WM, Yan H. Challenges and opportunities for structural DNA nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol. 2011;6:763–72. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2011.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Perry CM, Balfour JA. Fomivirsen. Drugs. 1999;57:375–80. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957030-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Anderson KP, Fox MC, Brown-Driver V, Martin MJ, Azad RF. Inhibition of human cytomegalovirus immediate-early gene expression by an antisense oligonucleotide complementary to immediate-early RNA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2004–11. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.9.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Blom DJ, Raal FJ, Santos RD, Marais AD. Lomitapide and mipomersen-inhibiting microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) and apoB100 synthesis. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21:48. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0809-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Aartsma-Rus A. FDA approval of nusinersen for spinal muscular atrophy makes 2016 the year of splice modulating oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther. 2017;27:67–9. doi: 10.1089/nat.2017.0665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Heo YA. Golodirsen: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80:329–33. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01267-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Dhillon S. Viltolarsen: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80:1027–31. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01339-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Shirley M. Casimersen: first approval. Drugs. 2021;81:875–9. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01512-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Kim J, Hu C, Moufawad El Achkar C, Black LE, Douville J, Larson A, et al. Patient-customized oligonucleotide therapy for a rare genetic disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1644–52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Khan AU. Ribozyme: a clinical tool. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;367:20–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2005.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Morrow PK, Murthy RK, Ensor JD, Gordon GS, Margolin KA, Elias AD, et al. An open-label, phase 2 trial of RPI.4610 (Angiozyme) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:4098–104. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Mitsuyasu RT, Merigan TC, Carr A, Zack JA, Winters MA, Workman C, et al. Phase 2 gene therapy trial of an anti-HIV ribozyme in autologous CD34+ cells. Nat Med. 2009;15:285–92. doi: 10.1038/nm.1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Adams D, Gonzalez-Duarte A, O’Riordan WD, Yang CC, Ueda M, Kristen AV, et al. Patisiran, an RNAi therapeutic, for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:11–21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Benson MD, Waddington-Cruz M, Berk JL, Polydefkis M, Dyck PJ, Wang AK, et al. Inotersen treatment for patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:22–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Zimmermann TS, Karsten V, Chan A, Chiesa J, Boyce M, Bettencourt BR, et al. Clinical proof of concept for a novel hepatocyte-targeting GalNAc-siRNA conjugate. Mol Ther. 2017;25:71–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Garber K. Alnylam terminates revusiran program, stock plunges. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:1213–4. doi: 10.1038/nbt1216-1213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Nair JK, Attarwala H, Sehgal A, Wang Q, Aluri K, Zhang X, et al. Impact of enhanced metabolic stability on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GalNAc-siRNA conjugates. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:10969–77. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Scott LJ. Givosiran: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80:335–9. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01269-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Scott LJ, Keam SJ. Lumasiran: first approval. Drugs. 2021;81:277–82. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01463-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zorde Khvalevsky E, Gabai R, Rachmut IH, Horwitz E, Brunschwig Z, Orbach A, et al. Mutant KRAS is a druggable target for pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:20723–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314307110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Titze-de-Almeida R, David C, Titze-de-Almeida SS. The race of 10 synthetic RNAi-based drugs to the pharmaceutical market. Pharm Res. 2017;34:1339–63. doi: 10.1007/s11095-017-2134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Drury RE, O’Connor D, Pollard AJ. The clinical application of MicroRNAs in infectious disease. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1182. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Zhang L, Liao Y, Tang L. MicroRNA-34 family: a potential tumor suppressor and therapeutic candidate in cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:53. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1059-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Sarker D, Plummer R, Meyer T, Sodergren MH, Basu B, Chee CE, et al. MTL-CEBPA, a small activating RNA therapeutic upregulating C/EBP-α, in patients with advanced liver cancer: a first-in-human, multicenter, open-label, phase I trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:3936–46. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Setten RL, Lightfoot HL, Habib NA, Rossi JJ. Development of MTL-CEBPA: small activating RNA drug for hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2018;19:611–21. doi: 10.2174/1389201019666180611093428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Huang KW, Tan CP, Reebye V, Chee CE, Zacharoulis D, Habib R, et al. MTL-CEBPA combined with immunotherapy or RFA enhances immunological anti-tumor response in preclinical models. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:9168. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Beane JD, Lee G, Zheng Z, Mendel M, Abate-Daga D, Bharathan M, et al. Clinical Scale Zinc Finger nuclease-mediated gene editing of PD-1 in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Mol Ther. 2015;23:1380–90. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Maeder ML, Stefanidakis M, Wilson CJ, Baral R, Barrera LA, Bounoutas GS, et al. Development of a gene-editing approach to restore vision loss in Leber congenital amaurosis type 10. Nat Med. 2019;25:229–33. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0327-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Maeder ML, Gersbach CA. Genome-editing technologies for gene and cell therapy. Mol Ther. 2016;24:430–46. doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Ng EW, Shima DT, Calias P, Cunningham ET, Jr., Guyer DR, Adamis AP. Pegaptanib, a targeted anti-VEGF aptamer for ocular vascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006;5:123–32. doi: 10.1038/nrd1955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Lamb YN. BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine: first approval. Drugs. 2021;81:495–501. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01480-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Baden LR, El Sahly HM, Essink B, Kotloff K, Frey S, Novak R, et al. Efficacy and safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:403–16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Corbett KS, Edwards DK, Leist SR, Abiona OM, Boyoglu-Barnum S, Gillespie RA, et al. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine design enabled by prototype pathogen preparedness. Nature. 2020;586:567–71. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2622-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Heine A, Juranek S, Brossart P. Clinical and immunological effects of mRNA vaccines in malignant diseases. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:52. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01339-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Miao L, Zhang Y, Huang L. mRNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20:41. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01335-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Memczak S, Jens M, Elefsinioti A, Torti F, Krueger J, Rybak A, et al. Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency. Nature. 2013;495:333–8. doi: 10.1038/nature11928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, Bramsen JB, Finsen B, Damgaard CK, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495:384–8. doi: 10.1038/nature11993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Lavenniah A, Luu TDA, Li YP, Lim TB, Jiang J, Ackers-Johnson M, et al. Engineered circular RNA sponges act as miRNA inhibitors to attenuate pressure overload-induced cardiac hypertrophy. Mol Ther. 2020;28:1506–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Liu CX, Guo SK, Nan F, Xu YF, Yang L, Chen LL. RNA circles with minimized immunogenicity as potent PKR inhibitors. Mol Cell. 2022;82:420–34.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Qu L, Yi Z, Shen Y, Lin L, Chen F, Xu Y, et al. Circular RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 and emerging variants. Cell. 2022;185:1728–44.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Toden S, Zumwalt TJ, Goel A. Non-coding RNAs and potential therapeutic targeting in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1875:188491. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2020.188491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Matsui M, Corey DR. Non-coding RNAs as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:167–79. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Winkle M, El-Daly SM, Fabbri M, Calin GA. Noncoding RNA therapeutics—challenges and potential solutions. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20:629–51. doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00219-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.He B, Peng W, Huang J, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Yang X, et al. Modulation of metabolic functions through Cas13d-mediated gene knockdown in liver. Protein Cell. 2020;11:518–24. doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00700-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Zhou C, Hu X, Tang C, Liu W, Wang S, Zhou Y, et al. CasRx-mediated RNA targeting prevents choroidal neovascularization in a mouse model of age-related macular degeneration. Natl Sci Rev. 2020;7:835–7. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaa033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Kamola PJ, Nakano Y, Takahashi T, Wilson PA, Ui-Tei K. The siRNA non-seed region and its target sequences are auxiliary determinants of off-target effects. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015;11:e1004656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Grimm D, Streetz KL, Jopling CL, Storm TA, Pandey K, Davis CR, et al. Fatality in mice due to oversaturation of cellular microRNA/short hairpin RNA pathways. Nature. 2006;441:537–41. doi: 10.1038/nature04791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Swayze EE, Siwkowski AM, Wancewicz EV, Migawa MT, Wyrzykiewicz TK, Hung G, et al. Antisense oligonucleotides containing locked nucleic acid improve potency but cause significant hepatotoxicity in animals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:687–700. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Chen QX, Wang WP, Zeng S, Urayama S, Yu AM. A general approach to high-yield biosynthesis of chimeric RNAs bearing various types of functional small RNAs for broad applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:3857–69. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Patel S, Kim J, Herrera M, Mukherjee A, Kabanov AV, Sahay G. Brief update on endocytosis of nanomedicines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2019;144:90–111. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2019.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Paunovska K, Loughrey D, Sago CD, Langer R, Dahlman JE. Using large datasets to understand nanotechnology. Adv Mater. 2019;31:e1902798. doi: 10.1002/adma.201902798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Mullard A. Small molecules against RNA targets attract big backers. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16:813–5. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Dhillon S. Risdiplam: first approval. Drugs. 2020;80:1853–8. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01410-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Warner KD, Hajdin CE, Weeks KM. Principles for targeting RNA with drug-like small molecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17:547–58. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are included in this paper.


Articles from Cell Death & Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES