Abstract
In Japan, only a few rivers have been inspected for Cryptosporidium parvum contamination, and the methods used had low sensitivity. In 1998 and 1999, we used a method with higher sensitivity to examine all large rivers used as sources of water supply in one prefecture (which we divided into four areas) in western Japan for Cryptosporidium oocysts. One sample was collected at each of 156 sites along 18 rivers, and samples were tested for Cryptosporidium oocysts by immunomagnetic separation. Samples were classified as being obtained on an island with livestock and fishing industries, a densely populated urban area, a western region including farming villages, or a still more rural northern area with agriculture and fishing. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was used for identification of the C. parvum found as the bovine or human type. C. parvum was detected in at least one sample from 13 of the 18 rivers and in 47% (74 of 156) of the samples. One-third to all of the samples from each area contained C. parvum oocysts. The number of C. parvum oocysts per 20 liters of river water varied in the same pattern as the number of cattle kept in the four kinds of areas (as determined by the Mantel extension test). Oocysts isolated were of the bovine type; the C. parvum detected in rivers probably came from cattle kept in that valley. As we had expected, when tested with a more sensitive method, river water in western Japan was found to be greatly contaminated with C. parvum oocysts, as reported in other countries.
The protozoa Cryptosporidium parvum and Giardia intestinalis (lamblia) are enteric parasitic pathogens found in water systems (17). Their oocysts and cysts, respectively, are environmentally robust, resisting disinfectants. C. parvum is small enough to be difficult to remove by filtration. It can cause outbreaks more readily than G. intestinalis because it produces many more oocysts in the host. The infective dose of C. parvum is low. Okhuysen et al. (19) found the 50% infective dose of the most virulent of their three isolates to be nine oocysts for healthy adults. Calculation on the basis of an epidemiological infection model showed that infection may occur with even one oocyst (9).
Since the first report of an outbreak of C. parvum infection caused by a contaminated water supply in 1985 (6), epidemiological studies of such contamination have been done in many countries, including the United States (20), Scotland (27), Australia (32), and South Africa (12). The methods used were diverse, so the results varied widely. Nevertheless, C. parvum was detected in almost all of the environmental waters tested (see reference 28 for a review). Groundwater and lake water have been examined, but river water used as the source of public water supplies has been surveyed more than other water sources in such studies.
In a study of surface water in 17 states in the United States, Rose et al. (23) reported finding oocysts in 93 (51%) of the 181 samples tested, and the mean number of oocysts detected was 4.3 per 10 liters. LeChevallier et al. (13) did a similar study in one province of Canada and 14 states in the United States and found oocysts in 74 (87%) of the 85 samples tested. In contrast, Roach et al. (22), in a study in the Yukon, Canada, found Cryptosporidium oocysts in only 3 (5%) of the 63 samples tested. These differences in the percentage and intensity of contamination of surface waters by Cryptosporidium oocysts may be related to the season (23), rainfall (7), or the presence of untreated feces of humans (16) or domestic animals such as cattle (26). The methods used to detect C. parvum are complicated, and results may be difficult to interpret because of low recovery at dilute concentrations and other problems (5).
In Japan, only two studies of river water have appeared; none has been done in western Japan or by the immunomagnetic separation assay based on method 1622 of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (30). By immunomagnetic separation, Cryptosporidium oocysts can be isolated from water. Recovery is poor when the sample is contaminated with organic particles or protozoa. The method has not been evaluated thoroughly for detection of C. parvum oocysts in water in field studies. We recently improved recovery in the field by adding three steps to this procedure. Therefore, we used our modified method to establish the present state of river contamination by Cryptosporidium oocysts in an entire prefecture, and we examined the relationship between the intensity of contamination and the numbers and varieties of domestic animals kept in the valleys of the rivers in question. We also examined whether Escherichia coli could be used as an index of Cryptosporidium contamination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Water sampling.
From July to November in 1998 or 1999, 18 rivers in Hyogo Prefecture in the Kansai area of western Japan were sampled twice. The areas studied were classified as island, eastern, western, and northern (Fig. 1). The island area, in the southernmost part of the prefecture, was an island in the Inland Sea, with flourishing livestock and fishing industries. The eastern area was an urban area with a high population density. The western area was a region mainly of small communities involved in extensive farming. The northern area was a still more rural region with much agricultural and fishing activity and with heavy snowfall in winter. The number of rivers sampled and the number of sampling sites were 4 and 10 in the island area, 5 and 87 in the eastern area, 4 and 40 in the western area, and 5 and 19 in the northern area, respectively, and the total number of samples taken was 156 (Fig. 1). One sample was taken from each sampling site.
FIG. 1.
Areas surveyed. The inset shows Hyogo Prefecture on a map of Japan excluding Okinawa. Samples of 20 liters were taken for testing for C. parvum oocysts from four rivers (10 sampling sites) in the island area, from five rivers (87 sites) in the eastern area, from four rivers (40 sites) in the western area, and from five rivers (19 sites) in the northern area. In addition, three samples of 100 liters for use in RFLP analysis were taken from a large river in every area but the northern one.
In addition, in all areas but the northern one, from one large river judged likely to be contaminated, a separate sample was taken for use in restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis for identification of the genotype of any C. parvum oocysts found. A river was considered to be contaminated when even one of the 1 to 29 samples was found to contain an oocyst(s). Results were classified as to whether the sampling site was upstream (total number of sampling sites, 35), midstream (54 sites), or downstream (67 sites). For this classification, a straight line connecting the beginning and end of the river on a map was divided into three equal lengths, regardless of the winding of the river.
For water sampling, a bucket or a combination of a generator (Honda, Tokyo, Japan) and a water pump (Terada Pump, Tokyo, Japan) was used for collection of 20 liters of water from roughly 50 cm below the water's surface; pumping took about 3 min. The sample was put into a polyethylene container. When the sampling site was far from a road, the same amount was concentrated while being collected with a capsule filter (Envirochek; Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, Mich.). This kind of filter was also used when an extra sampling of 100 liters was done for examination by RFLP analysis.
In 1998, at the same time as the sampling for C. parvum, 100-ml samples were collected in sterilized polyethylene test tubes for E. coli testing. All water samples were stored at 4°C in an insulated container with ice for immediate transportation to the laboratory and were processed within 24 h as described below.
Sample processing.
We used a pressure device (model XX82 001 15; Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.) to filter the water samples through a disk-filter holder fitted with a nitrocellulose membrane (CF; pore size, 1.2 μm; Millipore) and retrieved the material caught on the surface of the membrane by use of ultrasound (Heat Systems Ultrasonics, Farmingdale, N.Y.) in the first step that we added. In the second step that we added, the material retrieved was suspended in 0.15 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.6), and the mixture was sonicated for 1 min. A kit for immunomagnetic separation with Dynabeads coated with anti-Cryptosporidium antibodies (G-C Combo; Dynal A.S., Oslo, Norway) was used to treat the suspension. Preliminary experiments had shown that some captured oocysts remained attached to the beads, so we repeated this step (our third modification). The material that had bound to the antibodies was separated from them by treatment with 50 μl of 0.1 N HCl, the beads were held aside with a magnet, and the remaining suspension was removed from the tube with a pipette, placed on a slide, dried, and labeled with anti-Cryptosporidium monoclonal antibodies (Cellabs Pty. Ltd., Brookvale, New South Wales, Australia) conjugated with fluorescein so that oocysts could be identified (the first method [see below]). Water samples concentrated before transportation were first eluted into a buffer as described elsewhere (18) and then processed by immunomagnetic separation as described above.
Identification of oocysts from water by microscopy.
Three methods were used for identification of oocysts from water, with the exception of the 100-liter samples mentioned in the next section, and when results were positive by all three methods, the oocysts were identified as being of C. parvum. In the first method, oocysts stained with the labeled monoclonal antibodies mentioned above were checked for having a diameter of 4 to 6 μm at magnifications of ×400 to ×1,000 with a 400- to 440-nm (blue-violet) filter. With the second method, microscopy was used for examination of the same stained oocysts for sporozoites at a magnification of ×1,000 with a Nomarski interference contrast filter. With the third method, fluorescent staining with 6-diamino-2-phenylindole (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) was used to look for nuclei in sporozoites detected at magnifications of ×400 to ×1,000 with a 330- to 385-nm (UV) filter.
Identification of oocysts by PCR.
We used oocysts collected in capsule filters from 100-liter samples for analysis of RFLP by the method of Carraway et al. (4). Using primers that flanked a 515-bp region of an open reading frame in the C. parvum polythreonine locus, we amplified oocyst DNA from about 10 oocysts isolated from river water. The amplification product was digested with RsaI, and the pattern obtained by electrophoresis of the digest was compared with patterns of three strains of C. parvum of known origin and with the pattern of Cryptosporidium andersoni as well (15). For this comparison, we isolated one strain of C. parvum (diameter, 4.5 to 5.0 μm) from a calf and one strain of C. andersoni (5.5 to 7.5 μm) from a Guernsey cow. In addition, we used purified DNAs of C. parvum isolated from two patients with diarrhea. One strain had been identified as having the human profile by RFLP (only strains from humans have been found to have this genotype), and the other strain had been identified as having the bovine profile (isolates from human patients may have either the bovine or human profile). The National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan, provided both strains from patients.
Other.
Testing for E. coli was done by the method used by public water departments in Japan (11). This qualitative method is a combination of the defined-substrate method and the standard method. In brief, a 50-ml water sample is examined for coliforms by a method that uses ortho-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside and 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-d-galactoside (Colilert; Idex Lab Inc., Westbrook, Maine). Culture is done at 44.5°C for 24 h in two tubes containing a broth for E. coli (Nissui, Tokyo, Japan), and bacteria that produce gas are further cultured at 36°C for 20 h in a medium that uses 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-glucuronide and 5-bromo-6-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (Nissui). Coliforms that react in indole–methyl red–Voges-Proskauer–citrate tests are identified as being E. coli. We questioned residents of the area about the numbers of their domestic animals and also used published statistics on the numbers of domestic animals being kept (10).
Statistical analysis of differences between proportions of samples with C. parvum and E. coli contamination was done with the χ2 test of proportions. A possible trend for areas with larger numbers of livestock to have greater intensities of C. parvum contamination, in terms of oocysts per 20 liters, was evaluated with the Mantel extension test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine the differences in the intensities of contamination in different sections of the rivers. Differences with P values of <0.05 were defined as being statistically significant.
RESULTS
Contamination of rivers and areas.
C. parvum contaminated 13 (72%) of the 18 rivers tested, and E. coli contaminated 9 (69%) of the 13 rivers tested (Table 1). C. parvum and E. coli were detected in all areas tested. The proportions of samples with C. parvum were 10 of 10 (100%) in the island area, intermediate values in the eastern and western areas, and 7 of 19 (37%) in the northern area (Table 2; P < 0.005). The proportions with E. coli changed in the same pattern (P < 0.001).
TABLE 1.
C. parvum and E. coli in rivers in four areas
| Area | No. of rivers tested | No. (%) of rivers contaminated with:
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| C. parvum | E. coli | ||
| Island | 4 | 4 (100) | 4 (100) |
| Eastern | 5 | 4 (80) | NTa |
| Western | 4 | 4 (100) | 4 (100) |
| Northern | 5 | 1 (20) | 1 (20) |
NT, not tested.
TABLE 2.
C. parvum and E. coli in 156 water samples from four areas
| Area | No. of samples tested | No. (%) of samples witha:
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| C. parvum | E. coli | ||
| Island | 10 | 10 (100)bc | 10 (100)d |
| Eastern | 87 | 36 (41) | NTe |
| Western | 40 | 21 (53) | 33 (83)f |
| Northern | 19 | 7 (37) | 7 (37) |
χ2 test of proportions: C. parvum, χ2 = 13.6, df = 3, and P < 0.005; E. coli, χ2 = 17.9, df = 2, and P < 0.001.
Significantly different (P < 0.005) from values for the eastern and northern areas.
Significantly different (P < 0.05) from value for the western area.
Significantly different (P < 0.005) from value for the northern area.
NT, not tested.
Significantly different (P < 0.001) from value for the northern area.
Relationship of contamination by oocysts to numbers of domestic animals in the area.
Table 3 shows the mean number of C. parvum oocysts found per 20 liters of water, referred to as the intensity of contamination, and the numbers of cattle, pigs, and chickens in each area. The mean concentration of oocysts was largest (2.4 per 20 liters) in the island area and smallest (1.4 per 20 liters) in the northern area. The intensity of contamination by C. parvum and the number of cattle in the different areas varied in the same pattern (P < 0.005).
TABLE 3.
Intensities of C. parvum contamination and numbers of livestock in four areas
| Area | No. (%) of samples with oocysts | Mean no. of oocysts per 20 liters (range) | No. of livestock (to nearest hundred)a
|
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle | Pigs | Chickens | |||
| Island | 10 (100) | 2.4 (1–6) | 43,100 | 9,300 | 6,000 |
| Eastern | 36 (41) | 1.8 (1–8) | 23,600 | 7,000 | 5,100 |
| Western | 21 (53) | 1.6 (1–3) | 26,900 | 8,600 | 59,200 |
| Northern | 7 (37) | 1.4 (1–4) | 9,000 | 11,800 | 34,600 |
Mantel extension test: cattle, χ2 = 9.56, df = 1, and P < 0.005; pigs, χ2 = 1.03, df = 1, and P = 0.31; chickens, χ2 = 0.80, df = 1, and P = 0.37.
Relationship of location along the river and intensity of contamination.
The percentages of samples with C. parvum and the intensities of contamination in different sections of the rivers are shown in Table 4. Of the samples from the 156 sampling sites, 37% of the upstream samples, 46% of the midstream samples, and 54% of the downstream samples were contaminated. The differences were not significant.
TABLE 4.
Contamination rates and intensities of C. parvum contamination at different locations along rivers
| Part of rivera | No. of samples tested | No. (%) of samples with oocysts | Mean no. of oocysts detected per 20 liters (range) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upstream | 35 | 13 (37) | 1.9 (1–6) |
| Midstream | 54 | 25 (46) | 1.5 (1–6) |
| Downstream | 67 | 36 (54) | 2.1 (1–8) |
The beginning and end of each river was marked on a map, a straight line was drawn between the two points, and the line was divided into three sections of equal length.
Identification of oocysts by PCR.
Results of electrophoresis of PCR products are shown in Fig. 2. With undigested DNAs from the three C. parvum strains of known origin and from the three large water samples, there was a single band at about 510 bp, but C. andersoni was not amplified (Fig. 2A). After digestion, DNAs from five of the six strains of C. parvum had three main bands, at 270, 130, and 50 bp. However, the C. parvum strain of the human type had two main bands, at about 400 and 50 bp. The oocysts that we detected in the water samples were from C. parvum of the bovine type.
FIG. 2.
RFLP analysis of seven Cryptosporidium isolates. (A) Undigested products of PCR; (B) PCR products digested with RsaI. Lanes M, size markers (100-bp ladder); lane 1, C. andersoni isolated from a Guernsey cow; lanes 2, C. parvum isolated from a calf; lanes 3, C. parvum of the bovine type (strain Cp/h8) isolated from a patient; lanes 4, C. parvum of the human type isolated from a patient; lanes 5 to 7, C. parvum isolated from three rivers from the island, eastern, and western areas, respectively.
DISCUSSION
The results of two epidemiological studies of C. parvum in Japan have been published. In a study done by Hashimoto and Hirata (8) in central Japan, from a total of 13 sites along the Sagami River and its tributaries, water was sampled one to four times, with a large sample size (100 liters), and contamination was found at 9 (75%) of the 12 sites examined in 1996 and at 4 (67%) of the 6 sites examined in 1997. The rate of contamination that we found also was high, in agreement with their results, although they used an earlier method still used by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan and we used a method more popular outside of Japan (method 1622 of the U.S. EPA).
Groups in Japan generally use a provisional method published in Japan in 1996 and based on an earlier EPA procedure, the information collection rule, with filtration usually of only 10 liters of water through a nitrocellulose membrane and dissolution of material caught on the filter in acetone. With this method, in a 1997 survey of sources of water supply that examined 277 sites in 94 rivers throughout Japan, the Ministry of Health and Welfare found Cryptosporidium oocysts in only 8 (2.9%) of the 277 sites tested (31). The different volumes of the samples (10 and 100 liters) used is the probable cause of the discrepant results in the two surveys mentioned above, rather than differences in the sites or seasons. The method that both surveys used, which is complicated, is termed provisional because there are doubts about recovery and sensitivity (21); reliability and validity also are questionable. We used immunomagnetic separation, an unrelated method, adding three modifications to improve recovery. Our results suggest again that the method would be useful in epidemiological studies as found earlier by Campbell and Smith (3) and Bukhari et al. (2).
Possible sources of contamination of rivers by C. parvum are raw or treated sewage from humans and feces of domesticated and wild animals (15, 25). C. parvum has a wide range of hosts, including 79 species of mammals. Atwill et al. (1) found that 5.4% of 221 wild pigs tested in California were shedding C. parvum oocysts. Hashimoto and Hirata (8) suggested that uncomposted feces from a large-scale pig-breeding facility on the upper reaches of the river studied might be contaminating the river. In the areas we studied, however, there were no such large-scale facilities, and the incidence of parasitism was low (there were no positive results for any of the 567 pigs tested); pigs were not a likely source of contamination in our study. Uga et al. (data not shown) found that 8.9% of 418 chicken tested were shedding oocysts of Cryptosporidium baileyi in our survey areas. Wild animals such as deer and boar live in the western and northern areas we surveyed, but in numbers too small to be a problem. In rural parts of the prefecture, human waste is gathered in underground domestic tanks emptied regularly by collection trucks. In those areas, raw sewage that accidentally overflows may end up in a river, but sewage is almost always properly treated and there is strict water quality control for treated sewage in Japan, so contamination probably does not arise in this way.
In small farms in Japan, cattle feces are not composted, and Cryptosporidium oocysts shed by these cattle may contaminate rivers. The island area, the smallest of the four, had the most cattle and the highest density. That the percentage of samples contaminated was highest in the island area and lowest in the northern area suggested that the percentage of contaminated samples was related to the number of cattle in that area, or in other words, that oocysts shed by cattle are contaminating the environment. Saeki et al. (24) detected C. parvum in 1 (0.2%) of 582 adult cattle in the same prefecture, and we (29) reported that 24 (80%) of 30 calves tested shed C. parvum oocysts during the first month of life. Our RFLP results showed that the genotype of the C. parvum oocysts retrieved from river water was that found in cattle. Humans can be infected with C. parvum of the genotype originally isolated from cattle and still called the bovine type; nevertheless, it is likely that cattle had shed a large majority of the oocysts that we found in river water.
In our study, the percentage of contaminated samples was higher downstream than upstream, and the intensity of contamination also was greater downstream. We estimated that about half of the farms with cattle were upstream, making it likely that contamination started upstream and later affected downstream areas. Our findings suggest that C. parvum oocysts do not decrease in number by settling out while moving downstream but that the intensity of contamination instead increases downstream, because of the confluence of contaminated tributary streams.
Studies of C. parvum in river water involve complex procedures and various kinds of equipment. Evaluation of the data obtained also requires skill. Accordingly, attempts have been made to find an index of contamination other than C. parvum oocysts, one for which testing is easier. LeChevallier and Norton (14) found that turbidity (which increases after a heavy rainfall) may be one index of contamination by C. parvum oocysts. In addition, protozoa in the water come from animal feces, so E. coli and coliform bacilli in general have been suggested for use as an index of protozoan contamination. However, such bacilli die more quickly in water than protozoa, preventing their detection by culture, and a satisfactory method for their use as an index of contamination has not been established. Rose et al. (23) found no correlation between the concentration of Cryptosporidium (or Giardia) and coliform bacilli in their samples of surface water, but LeChevallier et al. (13) reported a significant correlation between the numbers of Cryptosporidium oocysts and the numbers of total coliform bacilli in samples of raw water. We surveyed contamination by organisms other than C. parvum (G. intestinalis and Clostridium perfringens [data not shown], in addition to E. coli) and found that the percentage of samples contaminated by E. coli was closest to the percentage contaminated by C. parvum. Many samples were contaminated with both organisms, more so than for the two other combinations. In this survey, we used a qualitative method for detection of E. coli. In our previous quantitative study, we found no relation between the number of E. coli cells and the number of Cryptosporidium oocysts detected (data not shown). A similar observation was reported by Simmons et al. (25). If E. coli is an index for Cryptosporidium contamination, a simple qualitative test may be sufficient.
The results of our study showed that Cryptosporidium contamination is widespread in the rivers of Japan and that immunomagnetic separation is a useful method for detection of this protozoan. E. coli may be an index of Cryptosporidium contamination.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the staffs of the Division of Public Health Sanitation, the health centers, and the water supply offices of Hyogo Prefecture for contributions to this work, including help in collection of water specimens. We also thank Caroline Latta of Osaka City University Medical School for reading the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Atwill E R, Sweitzer R A, Pereira M D G C, Gardner I A, Vuren D V, Boyce W M. Prevalence of and associated risk factors for shedding Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts and Giardia cysts within feral pig populations in California. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:3946–3949. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.10.3946-3949.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bukhari Z, McCuin R M, Fricker C R, Clancy J L. Immunomagnetic separation of Cryptosporidium parvum from source water samples of various turbidities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998;64:4495–4499. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.11.4495-4499.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Campbell A, Smith H. Immunomagnetic separation of Cryptosporidium oocysts from water samples: round robin comparison of techniques. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35:397–401. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Carraway M, Tzipori S, Widmer G. A new restriction fragment length polymorphism from Cryptosporidium parvum identifies genetically heterogeneous parasite populations and genotypic changes following transmission from bovine to human hosts. Infect Immun. 1997;65:3958–3960. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.9.3958-3960.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clancy J L, Gollnitz W D, Tabib Z. Commercial labs: how accurate are they? J Am Water Works Assoc. 1994;86(5):89–97. [Google Scholar]
- 6.D'Antonio R G, Winn R E, Taylor J P, Gustafson T L, Current W L, Rhodes M M, Gary G W, Jr, Zajac R A. A waterborne outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in normal hosts. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103:886–888. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-103-6-886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hansen J S, Ongerth J E. Effects of time and watershed characteristics on the concentration of Cryptosporidium oocysts in river water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:2790–2795. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.10.2790-2795.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hashimoto A, Hirata T. Cryptosporidium oocysts and Giardia cysts in Sagami River and its tributaries. Jpn Soc Water Environ. 1998;21:119–122. . (In Japanese with English abstract.) [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hass C N, Crockett C S, Rose J B, Gerba C P, Fazil A M. Assessing the risk posed by oocysts in drinking water. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1996;88(9):131–136. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hyogo Statistics and Information Office. 1999. Annual report of statistics on agriculture and horticulture in Hyogo. 48:116–119. (In Japanese.)
- 11.Japan Water Works Association. Order VIII. Microbiological tests. 1993. pp. 502–517. . Coordinating ed., M. Ando. In Guidelines for drinking water quality. Japan Water Works Association, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese.) [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kfir R, Hilner C, du Preez M, Bateman B. Studies on the prevalence of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in South African water. Water Sci Technol. 1995;31:435–438. [Google Scholar]
- 13.LeChevallier M W, Norton W D, Lee R G. Occurrence of Giardia and Cryptosporidium spp. in surface water supplies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991;57:2610–2616. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.9.2610-2616.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.LeChevallier M W, Norton W D. Examining relationships between particle counts and Giardia, Cryptosporidium, and turbidity. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1992;84(3):54–60. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lindsay D S, Upton S J, Owens D S, Morgan U M, Mead J R, Blagburn B L. Cryptosporidium andersoni n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporiidae) from cattle, Bos taurus. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2000;47:91–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00016.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Madore M S, Rose J B, Gerba C P, Arrowood M J, Sterling C R. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium oocysts in sewage effluents and selected surface waters. J Parasitol. 1987;73:702–705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Marshall M M, Naumovitz D, Ortega Y, Sterling C R. Waterborne protozoan pathogens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:67–85. doi: 10.1128/cmr.10.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Matheson Z, Hargy T M, McCuin R M, Clancy J L, Fricker C R. An evaluation of the Gelman Envirochek® capsule for the simultaneous concentration of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from water. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;85:755–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1998.00588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Okhuysen P C, Chappell C L, Crabb J H, Sterling C R, Dupont H L. Virulence of three distinct Cryptosporidium parvum isolates for healthy adults. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:1275–1281. doi: 10.1086/315033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ongerth J E, Stibbs H H. Identification of Cryptosporidium oocysts in river water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:672–676. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.4.672-676.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ono K, Tsuji H, Masuda K, Rai S K, Uga S, Matsumura T, Kawamura T. Method to detect the waterborne protozoan Cryptosporidium parvum. Bull Hyogo Inst Public Health. 1997;32:100–106. . (In Japanese.) [Google Scholar]
- 22.Roach P D, Olson M E, Whitley G, Wallis P M. Waterborne Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts in the Yukon, Canada. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:67–73. doi: 10.1128/aem.59.1.67-73.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rose J B, Gerba C P, Jakubowski W. Survey of potable water supplies for Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Environ Sci Technol. 1991;25:1393–1400. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Saeki S, Inada I, Fukumizu S, Yoshioka K, Okahata K, Oh S, Inamoto F, Takekawa A, Uga S. Epidemiological studies on Cryptosporidium spp. infection in cattle in Hyogo Prefecture. J Jpn Vet Med Assoc. 2000;53:25–29. . (In Japanese.) [Google Scholar]
- 25.Simmons O D, III, Sobsey M D, Schaefer III F W, Francy D S, Nally R A, Heaney C D. Evaluation of USEPA method 1622 for detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in stream waters. J Am Water Works Assoc. 2001;93(1):78–87. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sischo W M, Atwill E R, Lanyon L E, George J. Cryptosporidia on dairy farms and the role these farms may have in contaminating surface water supplies in the northeastern United States. Prev Vet Med. 2000;43:253–267. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5877(99)00107-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Smith H V, Grimason A M, Benton C, Parker J F W. The occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in Scottish waters, and the development of a fluorogenic viability assay for individual Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts. Water Sci Technol. 1991;24:169–172. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Smith H V, Rose J B. Waterborne cryptosporidiosis: current status. Parasitol Today. 1998;14:14–22. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(97)01150-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Uga S, Matsuo J, Kono E, Kimura K, Inoue M, Rai S K, Ono K. Prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum infection and pattern of oocyst shedding in calves in Japan. Vet Parasitol. 2000;94:27–32. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(00)00338-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. Method 1622: Cryptosporidium in water by filtration IMS FA. U.S. Washington, D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Water Research Center. Research report on survey of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from source water. 1997. Coordinating ed., M. Kaneko. Water Research Center, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese.) [Google Scholar]
- 32.Weinstein P, Macaitis M, Walker C, Cameron S. Cryptosporidial diarrhoea in South Australia: an exploratory case-control study of risk factors for transmission. Med J Aust. 1993;158:117–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


