Abstract
An analysis of China’s domestic publications revealed that China’s hormesis-related research was enormously underestimated. China’s documented hormesis-related research spans at least four decades, covers a broad spectrum of research areas, and is more abundant than previously thought. These findings should be considered in historical assessments of the concept of hormesis. Moreover, similar to the international literature, different terms have been used to describe the same phenomenon (hormesis), which hampers communication, generalization of findings and accumulation of knowledge. Hence, we advocate that ‘hormesis’ should be cited as a keyword in all the relevant publications written in Chinese language.
Keywords: biphasic response, domestic publication, dose-response relationship, hormetic, science publishing, scientific literature
Although China ranks second (615 records) after USA (993 records) in terms of total publication records including the term ‘hormesis’ or ‘hormetic’ for all years (third comes Italy with 265 records), the championship in hormesis research shifted dramatically from USA to China in the recent years (Web of Science; Search method: All Fields; accessed 6 April 2022). China has emerged as the new powerhouse of hormesis research, becoming the largest producer of hormesis-related publications in 2019-2020. 1 China’s takeover became clearer in 2021. China (82 records) outperformed USA (73 records) with 12% more publications in 2020; however, this difference raised to 40% in 2021, with 106 records for China versus 76 records for USA (Web of Science; Search method: All Fields; total number of search records: accessed 6 April 2022). Not only do these indicate that China is leading the world in hormesis research, but they also suggest a plateau state for USA versus an explosive growth for China. It is unclear if this overtaking is here to stay for long, but considering that China has now become the world’s leader in various scientific metrics, including the total number of publications and patents, 2 one may expect that the growth of China’s hormesis research will continue in the near future.
As stated before, studies reporting findings suggestive of hormesis have also been published in China’s domestic journals. 1 However, the exact proportion of hormesis-related publications in China’s domestic journals and the origins of hormesis research in China were not evaluated. Here, we examine these by searching three leading Chinese literature databases.
Surveys within the three literature search engines reveal that China’s hormesis-related research was enormously underestimated. While the China’s total number of records was 615 in the Web of Science, this new analysis now reveals that the total number of records published in China’s domestic journals is 9.4% higher (673 records; Table 1) than the total number of records in the Web of Science. Moreover, this new analysis reveals that China (1288 records) has surpassed (+29.7%) USA (993 records) regarding the total number of hormesis-related publications across all years. These estimates for China may also be greatly underestimated because they are based on the assumption of maximum number of duplicates across all searches. Specifically, they are based on the hypothesis that each article contained the term ‘hormesis' additionally to other terms searched, which is false because our evaluation revealed that there are publications citing at least one of the other keywords searched but not ‘hormesis'. These estimates are also based on the hypothesis that the records of the database with the highest number of records (CNKI) include all the records identified by the other databases. Hence, this new analysis reveals that China’s hormesis-related research has been more massive than previously thought.
Table 1.
Keyword | Database | Number of records | Year of earliest record |
---|---|---|---|
Hormesis | CNKI | 673 | 1985 4 |
CSTTPB | 194 | 1990 3 | |
WFD | 323 | 1985 5 | |
Hormetic | CNKI | 104 | 1995 6 |
CSTTPB | 27 | 1997 7 | |
WFD | 31 | 1989 8 | |
Hormetin | CNKI | 0 | n/a |
CSTTPB | 0 | n/a | |
WFD | 0 | n/a | |
低剂量兴奋效应 | CNKI | 131 | 1991 9 |
CSTTPB | 129 | 1990 10 | |
WFD | 34 | 1991 11 | |
毒物兴奋效应 | CNKI | 178 | 1991 9 |
CSTTPB | 81 | 1997 12 | |
WFD | 148 | 1998 13 |
Importantly, while the earliest record of hormesis-related research revealed by the search within the Web of Science was in 2005, the new search in Chinese databases now reveals that the first documented report for hormesis-related findings dates back to 1985, extending the previously assumed span by 20 years and showing that hormesis phenomena have been known within China’s scientific community for at least four decades. Even reviews putting hormesis into the context of toxicology for further development were published in Chinese language earlier than the earliest record revealed by the Web of Science. 14 These findings also indicate that the entire hormesis literature is profoundly larger than previously thought. Similar to China’s domestic literature, this may be the case in several other countries where numerous studies are published in languages other than English, calling for similar examinations in other non-English domestic literatures.
This new analysis, however, reveals another important issue. The terminology used to describe hormesis within and across disciplines and research fields has been widely varied in the international literature (including dozens of terms), a matter that has been widely discussed in several review-type publications. Here, this new analysis indicates that this problem is even more significant because even more terms have been used in non-English languages as well, as is the case in China. At least two English terms and two Chinese terms were used in Chinese scripts (Table 1). However, the use of different terms to describe the same phenomenon impedes scientific progress and the accumulation of knowledge. Therefore, we advocate that researchers should report the English term ‘hormesis’ (even in the keywords only) regardless of the scripts’ language. This practice will permit tracing of the studies by the international scientific community and ultimately facilitate progress in the field.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: E.A. acknowledges support from The Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology (NUIST), Nanjing, China (No. 003080) and the Jiangsu Distinguished Professor program of the People’s Government of Jiangsu Province. H.S. acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22006116).
ORCID iD
Evgenios Agathokleous https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-4857
References
- 1.Agathokleous E China. The new powerhouse of hormesis research? Dose-Response. 2021;19:1559325821995655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mervis J. US Science no longer leads the world. Here’s how top advisers say the nation should respond. Science 2022;277:470-471. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fan ZP, Han GX, Zhang QX. “Hormesis” phenomenon and low level ionizing radiation. Foreign Medicine (Radiology and Nuclear Medicine). 1990;14(1):13-167. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liu S. Some advances in radiation immunology. Radiation Protection (China). 1985;5(2):129-140. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu S, Xu G, Li X, Xia F, Yu H, Qi J, et al. A restudy of immune functions of the inhabitants in high background radiation area in Guangdong. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection. 1985;5(2):124-127. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 6.Liu S. Current status of research on radiation hormesis in the immune system after low level radiation. Journal of Radiation Research and Radiation Processing 1995;13(3):129-139. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou P, Sui J, Yang S. Hormetic effect of low dose radiation on cellular DNA repair. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection. 1997;17(3):155-158. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 8.Liu S, Liu H, Cai L, Sun J. Experimental studies on stimulatory effects of low dose ionizing radiation. Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection. 1989;09(4):247-250. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cheng W. Age-specific mortality analysis: a new model for assessing risk. Foreign Medicine (Pharmacy). 1991; 1991(1): 54-55. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ma F. Effects of cadmium chloride on action potential and contractile force of the isolated guinea pig papillary muscle. Chinese Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicology 1990;4(1):67-70. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuzin AM, Yu HC. Low dose excitatory effect in radiobiology. Foreign Medical Science. Section of Radiation Medicine and Nuclear Medicine. 1991;15(6):259-260. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chen XA, Cheng YE, Zhao KW. Discovery and biological significance of hormesis effect of small dose rare earth compounds. Rare Earth Information. 1997;1997(Z1):11-11. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yi Mi Ti MMJ, Wu Mai Er GLN, Fujikawa K. Effects of low-dose neutrons on the growth of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ram. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University 1998;21(1): 56-59. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dai FY, Zheng YX. Re-examination of the central law of toxicology -- the dose-response relationship of toxicant excitability and its impact on the development of toxicology. Journal of Environmental Hygiene (Foreign Medical Hygiene). 2003; 30(4):246-249. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]