Abstract
Gene therapy for genetic hearing loss is an emerging therapeutic modality for hearing restoration. However, the approach has not yet been translated into clinical application. To further develop inner-ear gene therapy, we engineered a novel mouse model bearing a human mutation in the transmembrane channel-1 gene (Tmc1) and characterized the auditory phenotype of the mice. TMC1 forms the mechanosensory transduction channel in mice and humans and is necessary for auditory function. We found that mice harboring the equivalent of the human p.N199I mutation (p.N193I) had profound congenital hearing loss due to loss of hair cell sensory transduction. Next, we optimized and screened viral payloads packaged into AAV9-PHP.B capsids. The vectors were injected into the inner ears of Tmc1Δ/Δ mice and the new humanized Tmc1-p.N193I mouse model. Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), cell survival, and biodistribution were evaluated in the injected mice. We found broad-spectrum, durable recovery of auditory function in Tmc1-p.N193I mice injected with AAV9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1-WPRE. ABR and DPOAE thresholds were equivalent to those of wild-type mice across the entire frequency range. Biodistribution analysis revealed viral DNA/RNA in the contralateral ear, brain, and liver but no overt toxicity. We conclude that the AAV9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1-WPRE construct may be suitable for further development as a gene therapy reagent for treatment of humans with genetic hearing loss due to recessive TMC1 mutations.
Keywords: inner ear, hair cell, cochlea, vestibular, utricle, saccule, ampulla, hearing loss, gene therapy, TMC1, TMC2, AAV, AAV9-PHP.B
1. Introduction
Hearing loss (HL) is the most prevalent sensorineural deficit, affecting about 20% of the global population (https://www.who.int/health-topics/hearing-loss, accessed on 24 May 2022), with nearly half due to genetic causes [1]. It is estimated that 1 in 500 newborns present with congenital HL, which profoundly affects language acquisition and consequently, social development [2]. Current standards of care for HL include hearing aids for people with diminished auditory function or cochlear implants, indicated for severe to profound HL. Unfortunately, there are no biological treatments available for HL and no interventions that restore auditory capacity to normal levels. During the last decade, many studies have investigated gene therapy strategies in animal models as treatments for genetic HL [3,4]. However, none of these experimental therapies have advanced to the clinic for treatment of humans.
The auditory sensory epithelium is contained within the cochlea, the bony spiral structure of the inner ear, which can be accessed for therapeutic intervention via the round window membrane. Cochlear hair cells are organized in the organ of Corti within a tonotopic gradient: high frequencies are sensed at the base and low frequencies at the apex. The cochlea includes two types of hair cells: inner hair cells (IHCs), which convert mechanical signals into electrical signals and transmit them to contacting afferent neurons and on to the brain; and outer hair cells (OHCs), which serve as cochlear amplifiers, necessary for signal amplification and tuning.
To develop inner-ear gene therapy for genetic HL, our lab has focused on gene replacement for transmembrane channel-1 (TMC1) [5,6,7]. TMC1 forms the ion channel at the core of the mechanosensory transduction complex in auditory and vestibular hair cells [8,9]. Mutations in TMC1 cause non-syndromic HL, which can be dominant (DFNA36) or recessive (DFNB7/11) [10,11]. Depending on the population, mutations in TMC1 represent 3–8% of genetic HL [12]. Mice that lack Tmc1 (Tmc1Δ/Δ) are profoundly deaf due to lack of sensory transduction and present with degeneration of cochlear hair cells beginning around four weeks of age [13].
In prior work from our lab, we used an AAV2/1 viral capsid to deliver mouse Tmc1 cDNA sequence into Tmc1Δ/Δ mice and recovered their hearing capacity, albeit with high thresholds and only in the low frequency range [5]. The limited recovery was the result of viral transduction in IHCs, but not OHCs [5]. Even though the gene therapy strategy evoked a partial restoration of auditory thresholds in a limited hearing range, it demonstrated that hair cells can be targeted by AAV viruses and that the auditory function can be recovered in mice with profound genetic HL. In order to improve the extent of the recovery, non-conventional viral capsids were screened. Our lab discovered that the Anc80L065 capsid was able transduce both IHCs and OHCs in vivo [14]. Delivery of Tmc1 using this capsid extended the level of auditory recovery at low and middle frequencies [6]. Recently, we showed that gene therapy for Tmc1 using the synthetic AAV9-PHP.B capsid [15] further improved the recovery of auditory thresholds in Tmc1Δ/Δ mice [7]. Importantly, the AAV9-PHP.B capsid transduced IHCs and OHCs efficiently along the entire tonotopic gradient [16], which is required to enable broad-spectrum auditory recovery.
While the prior work focused on gene therapy recovery in Tmc1Δ/Δ mice, there are no human TMC1 mutations equivalent to that of Tmc1Δ/Δ mice. Over 65 human TMC1 mutations have been described that cause DFNB7/11. Some mutations are associated with severe-to-profound congenital deafness and result from premature stop mutations, frame shift mutations, and other functional null mutations. In contrast, several point mutations that yield single amino acid substitutions cause milder phenotypes with moderate-to-severe hearing loss during the first decade of life [17]. For example, the human TMC1 mutation p.N199I (c.596A > T) causes progressive moderate-to-severe hearing loss that develops during childhood [17]. Thus, we wondered whether the milder hearing loss phenotype in patients with p.N199I, and other similar mutations, may provide an expanded capacity for therapeutic intervention using a gene replacement strategy.
We sought to study the effect of the missense p.N199I mutation by generating a humanized murine model harboring the homologous mutation in Tmc1 (p.N193I) and developed a gene therapy strategy using gene replacement through AAV delivery. For this study, 143 mice were injected with one of three viral constructs at three different doses, and 117 mice were used as uninjected controls. We performed over 420 measurements of auditory function on the 260 mice in the study. We found that mice homozygous for the Tmc1 p.N193I mutation have profound HL due to loss of mechanosensory transduction in cochlear hair cells. Mutant mice injected with AAV9-PHP.B carrying a functional copy of human TMC1 (hTMC1) successfully recovered auditory capacity. Using a CB6 promoter to drive the expression of hTMC1 yielded auditory recovery that spanned the frequency spectrum. Additionally, the optimized gene therapy strategy efficiently recovered hearing capacity in Tmc1Δ/Δ mice, though to a lesser extent at high frequencies. We report unprecedented recovery of auditory thresholds using AAV9-PHP.B-optimized constructs encoding hTMC1 in a humanized mouse model for genetic HL. These results demonstrate that early and efficient gene therapy intervention can restore auditory function in mice, suggesting potential translation for treatment of DFNB7/11 patients.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Mice
All procedures met NIH guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocols #18-01-3610R and #20-02-4149R) at Boston Children’s Hospital (BCH).
We used wild-type C57BL/6J mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) with corrected Ahl allele, Tmc1 mice with genotype Tmc1Δ/Δ; Tmc2+/+ on a C57BL/6J background [13], and knock-in mice with genotype Tmc1N193I/N193I; Tmc2+/+ or Tmc1N193I/N193I; Tmc2Δ/Δon a C57BL/6J background with the Ahl allele corrected. Mouse line Tmc1N193I/N193I; Tmc2+/+ was generated at the Mouse Gene Manipulation Core of the F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center at BCH using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The p.N193I (AAC > ATC) substitution in the Tmc1 gene was introduced by disruption of the endogenous gene using SpCas9 (IDT, Coralville, Iowa, USA, Cat#181058) with a gRNA that specifically targeted the Tmc1 sequence (5′-CAG GTGGATGTACGGCGTCAACATGG-3′) and homologous recombination using a template that spanned the whole exon (in upper case), part of the adjacent introns (in lower case) and contained the point mutation (in bold) (5′-ttggaagtcagggcttacCTCCGGTAACATGATGAGGCTGAAGGTCAACACAAAGAGAACCATGATGACGCCGTACATCCATCTGAGGAACAGGAAGTACGAGGCCACTGAGGAACCAAACTGACctgttacgaagaaaattaaaagactaaaggagagtcaaaacaacaacagcaccaatgaaaaac-3′).
The mutation was confirmed by Sanger sequencing analysis of a PCR product obtained from genomic DNA extracted from toe clips using lysis reagent (Viagen Biotech, Los Angeles, CA, USA) supplemented with Proteinase K (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and genotyping primers (F: 5′-ATTGGGGTGGAAACCGATACGA-3′, R: 5′-TCTCCTGAGAGAAAGAAGAGCGA-3′). Amplification conditions were as follows: 98 °C for 30 s; 42 × (98 °C for 10 s; 66 °C for 30 s; 72 °C for 50 s); 72 °C for 2 min. PCR products were loaded into a 1.2% agarose gel stained with SYBR Safe (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) for electrophoresis. The amplicon band was identified in an iBright CL1500 Imaging System (Invitrogen) and separated from the rest of the gel for further purification using the Monarch DNA Gel Extraction Kit (New England Biolabs).
Both males and females were used for experiments in approximately equal proportion. All mice were kept in a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle with accessibility to food and water ad libitum.
2.2. Plasmids and AAV Production
Human TMC1 (NM_138691.3) codon-optimized sequence (hTMC1) was cloned into AAV2 plasmids downstream of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) or chicken beta-actin-derived (CB6) promoter and followed by a woodchuck hepatitis post-transcriptional regulatory element (WPRE), unless otherwise indicated. Vector was produced by triple transfection of suspension HEK293 cells grown in Expi293 media (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, cells at ~2 × 106 cells/mL were transfected with pALDX-80 helper plasmid, AAV2/AAV9PHP.B rep/cap plasmid, and hTMC1 plasmid using PEIpro (Polyplus, Illkirch-Graffenstaden, France) formulated in OptiPRO SFM (Gibco). Seventy-two hours after transfection, cells were harvested by addition of Benzonase and 10× lysis buffer (500 mM Tris, 20 mM Magnesium Chloride, 10% Polysorbate 20, pH 8.0) followed by addition of 5 M Sodium Chloride to a final concentration of 500 mM. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation and stored at −80 °C until purification.
Immediately prior to chromatography, lysates were filtered across a 0.45/0.22 µm polish filter (Millipore, St. Louis, MO, USA) and then passed over POROS CaptureSelect AAV9 (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) affinity resin using an AKTA Pure instrument (Cytiva Life Sciences, Marlborough, MA, USA). Elution fractions with A280 values > 100 mAU were pooled and immediately neutralized with 10% volume of neutralization buffer (500 mM Bis-Tris Propane, 200 mM NaCl, 1% w/v Sucrose, 0.001% Poloxamer 188, pH 9.0). Following purification, the pooled affinity neutralized eluate was buffer-exchanged into final formulation buffer (dPBS, 5% w/v Sorbitol, 0.001% w/v Poloxamer 188, pH 7.0). Titer was determined using ddPCR as previously described [18]. The following titers of genome-containing particles were used: AAV2/9-PHP.B-CMV-hTMC1-WPRE: 3.26 × 1013 gc/mL or 6.3 × 1013 gc/mL; AAV2/9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1 No WPRE: 3.14 × 1012 gc/mL; AAV2/9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1-WPRE: 3.14 × 1012 gc/mL, 1.57 × 1013 gc/mL, 3.14–4.30 1013 gc/mL or 7.16 1013 gc/mL. Virus aliquots were stored at −80 °C.
2.3. Animal Surgery
All viral inner-ear injections were performed according the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at BCH protocols (#00001240 and #20-02-4149R) and were done via utricle injection as previously described [16]. In brief, P1-2 mice were anesthetized with hypothermia through 3 min of exposure to ice water. During the surgery (10–15 min), mice were kept on an ice pad. Using a stereo microscope (Stemi 2000, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) for visualization, a small postauricular incision was made to expose the cochlea bulla and semicircular canals surrounding the utricle. After puncturing the temporal bone, a glass micropipette was inserted into the puncture to manually inject 1–1.2 µL of AAV at a constant rate. Only left ears were used for injections. Following the procedure, mice were placed on a heating pad until fully recovered, and standard postoperative care was applied
2.4. Electrophysiology
Temporal bones were collected from P6–7 mice in Minimum Essential Media (Gibco). Overlying bone was removed with forceps and a needle until the cochlea could be accessed at the modiolus and separated from the vestibular portion of the inner ear. The organ of Corti was isolated from the modiolus and spiral ligament and anchored to a glass slide with a stainless-steel pin (Fine Science Tools, Foster City, CA, USA). After 1–2 days of incubation at 37 °C in minimum essential media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA) and 100 µg/mL ampicillin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), the tectorial membrane was removed, and the tissue was placed under an Axioskop FS (Carl Zeiss) upright microscope and visualized using a 63× water-immersion objective. Patch clamp recordings in whole-cell configuration of inner hair cells from the basal portion of the cochlea were performed as previously described in Pan et al. (2013, 2018). Briefly, tissues were kept at room temperature and submerged in an artificial perilymph solution containing (in mM): 137 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 5.8 KCl, 5.6 d-glucose, 1.3 CaCl2, 0.9 MgCl2, 0.7 NaH2PO4, and vitamins (1:100) and amino acids (1:50) (ThermoFisher) at pH 7.4 and 311 mOsmol/kg. Recording electrodes (3–5 MΩ) were pulled from R6 capillary glass (King Precision Glass, Claremont, CA, USA) and filled with an internal solution containing (in mM): 140 CsCl, 5 HEPES, 5 EGTA-KOH, 3.5 MgCl2, 2.5 Na2ATP, and 0.1 CaCl2 at pH 7.4 and 284 mOsm/kg. Sensory transduction currents were recorded at a holding potential of −84 mV using an Axopatch 200B (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Currents were low-pass filtered at 2–5 kHz with a Bessel filter, sampled at 20 kHz with a 12-bit acquisition board (Digidata 1322A), recorded with pCLAMP software (Molecular Devices), and corrected for a 4 mV liquid junction potential. Hair cell bundles were deflected using a 4–5 µm tip diameter stiff glass probe mounted on a PICMA chip piezo actuator (Physik Instruments, Karlsruhe, Germany). The actuator was driven by an LPZT amplifier (Physik Instruments) and filtered with an 8-pole Bessel filter at 40 kHz to eliminate residual pipette resonance. Data were analyzed with Clampfit and Origin (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).
2.5. FM1-43 Uptake
All experiments with membrane dye FM1-43 (Invitrogen) were performed at room temperature. FM1-43 stock solution (10 mM) was diluted to a working concentration (5 µM) in minimum essential media (Gibco). Mouse temporal bones were harvested at age P6, followed by microdissection of the organ of Corti. Freshly prepared FM1-43 was added to the culture for 10 s and then washed twice (5 min each wash) with minimum essential media. Live tissues were imaged with a 40× water immersion objective in an LSM 800 (Carl Zeiss) microscope.
2.6. Tissue Preparation and Confocal Immunofluorescence
Euthanization of 4- or 12-week-old mice was conducted via CO2 inhalation. Temporal bones were harvested, punctured at the round and oval windows and helicotrema, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at room temperature. Tissues were then decalcified in 120 mM EDTA for 16–24 h. Cochleas were sectioned into apical, middle, and basal portions. The organ of Corti was isolated and prepared for whole-mount processing by removal of the lateral wall, spiral limbus, and tectorial membrane. Tissues were permeabilized for 1 h in 0.25% Triton X-100, blocked for 1 h in 2.5% normal donkey serum, and stained at 4 °C overnight with rabbit anti-myosin 7a primary antibody (1:500 Proteus Biosciences, Ramona, CA, USA #25-6790). After washing with PBS, samples were incubated for 3–4 h with fluorophore-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:400 Alexa Fluor 647: Thermo Fisher #A31573) and fluorophore-conjugated phalloidin (1:400 Alexa Fluor Plus 405: Thermo Fisher #A30104). Tissues were then mounted on a glass coverslip with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Confocal imaging was performed using 10× air and 63× oil-immersion objectives with an LSM 800 (Carl Zeiss) microscope. Maximum intensity projection images were generated in ImageJ. Hair cell count analysis was performed manually.
2.7. Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Measurement
P16, 4-, 8-, or 12-week-old mice were anesthetized through intraperitoneal injection of a ketamine (100 mg/kg)/xylazine (15 mg/kg) cocktail. Mice were placed on a heating pad in a sound-proof chamber. The external auditory meatus was exposed through resection of the overlying skin and cartilage, and a custom speaker/microphone apparatus (EPL PXI Systems) was positioned directly above the entrance of the ear canal to deliver and record acoustic signals. Sound pressure at this location was calibrated for all stimulus frequencies before each test. Acoustic stimuli were delivered as 5 ms tone bursts at half-octave steps from 5.6 to 32 kHz and at 5 to 10 dB steps from 10 to 110 dB sound-pressure level (SPL) or until threshold was identified by the presence of a reproducible ABR waveform with a detectable peak 1. At each SPL, 512 responses to an alternating polarity stimulus were averaged. Electrical activity was recorded through subcutaneous needle electrodes behind the pinna (active electrode), at the vertex (reference), and at the hind leg (ground). ABR responses were amplified (10,000×), filtered (0.3 to 10 kHz), and digitized with LabVIEW software (Eaton-Peabody Laboratories). Electrode voltages and acoustic stimuli were sampled every 40 µs using a digital input-output board (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). Data were then plotted in Origin (OriginLab).
2.8. Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission (DPOAE) Measurement
DPOAE and ABR data were collected consecutively under identical conditions. DPOAE at 2f1-f2 were measured at half-octave f2 steps from 5.6 to 45.2 kHz and at 5 dB f2 steps from 10 to 80 dB SPL (f2/f1 = 1.2, L1–L2 = 10 dB). Threshold was determined after spectral averaging as the lowest L2 value to produce a DPOAE distinguishable from the surrounding noise floor and maintained at higher dB SPLs. Data were plotted in Origin (OriginLab).
2.9. RNA and DNA Isolation
Twelve-week-old animals were euthanized by cervical dislocation. The following organs were harvested, flash frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C: injected (left) inner ear, contralateral (right) inner ear, brain and liver. RNA and DNA were isolated from frozen mouse cochlea using TRI-Reagent (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and Direct-zol DNA/RNA Miniprep kits (Zymo Research). Briefly, frozen mouse cochleas were placed in a tube with a stainless-steel ball and TRI-Reagent. Samples were subjected to bead beating twice using a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Chloroform was added to samples and centrifuged to separate RNA, DNA, and protein. The top aqueous layer of RNA was carefully removed, followed by the interphase layer of DNA. Each layer was transferred to their respective tubes and diluted with 100% ethanol 1:1. RNA and DNA were subsequently purified through individual columns following the DNA/RNA Miniprep purification protocols. RNA and DNA from mouse brain and liver were purified using the All-Prep DNA/RNA kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Peripheral tissues were lysed similar to cochleas using the kits lysis buffer instead of TRI-Reagent.
2.10. Quantitative PCR
RNA and DNA were quantified according to the manufacturer’s protocols using the Quant-iT RNA Assay Kit (ThermoFisher) and the Quant-iT dsDNA Assay Kit (ThermoFisher) respectively; 100 ng of RNA underwent cDNA synthesis using the RT2 Easy First Strand Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
To assess vector genomes and transgene expression, qPCR was performed on gDNA and cDNA using PrimeTime Gene Expression 2× Master Mix (IDT), a fluorescently labeled 5′ nuclease probe (IDT), and hTMC1 opt primers with the following sequences: forward primer, 5′-GATCAGGATGGTCACGTATG-3′ and reverse primer 5′-GCTGGG AGACAATGGTAG-3′ and CFX-96 (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) instruments. A standard curve was prepared using a gBlock standard established over a six-fold dilution series from 5E1–5E6 copies per reaction. Samples were analyzed by the absolute quantification method against the standard curve using CFX Maestro software (BioRad). Transgene expression was normalized and represented as copies/1 µg RNA. Vector genome copies were normalized to amount and reported as copies/1 µg DNA.
2.11. Statistical Analyses
Normality tests were performed on the data prior to running statistical analysis. All figures present datasets that do not show normal distribution, and therefore, non-parametric tests were performed. For comparing two different groups (i.e., electrophysiology recording), Mann–Whitney test was used. For comparing datasets with more than two groups (i.e., hair cell counts), Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn test for multiple comparisons was applied. A p value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using Origin (OriginLab). Individual traces and mean values ± S.E.M. are presented in all figures. All values and statistics are presented in Supplemental Tables S1–S5.
3. Results
3.1. Characterization of p.N193I Mice
Patients homozygous for the p.N199I mutation in TMC1 present with moderate hearing loss, which progresses during the first decade of life [17]. We hypothesized that since this recessive mutation causes moderate but not profound HL, tissue degeneration may occur at later stages, suggesting the potential for an expanded capacity for therapeutic intervention. To generate a humanized mouse model for HL, we used CRISPR-Cas9 technology coupled with homologous recombination to specifically introduce an A > C substitution, which converted an AAC codon to ATC codon in the mouse genomic DNA (Figure 1A). The DNA substitution in the mouse Tmc1 gene yielded a p.N193I point mutation, homologous to the p.N199I mutation in humans. The N193 site occurs within the predicted first transmembrane domain of TMC1 [9,19] and is highly conserved among vertebrate clades (Figure 1B). As such, we hypothesized the residue is critical for TMC1 function and normal hearing in mice and humans. We tested the hearing capacity of the Tmc1N193I/+ and Tmc1N193I/N193I mice at postnatal day (P) 28 by recording auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) at a range of frequencies (5.6 to 32 kHz). We found that the Tmc1N193I/+ mice had normal hearing, with an average ABR threshold of 17.2 ± 2.2 decibels (dB) at 16 kHz (Figure 1C,D). We also recorded distortion products otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), an assay for outer hair cell function, and found that Tmc1N193I/+ mice had normal DPOAE thresholds compared to Tmc1+/+ mice (Figure 1D). On the contrary, Tmc1N193I/N193I mice were deaf, evident from the absence of ABR (up to 110 dB) and DPOAEs (up to 80 dB) thresholds at 1 month of age (Figure 1C,D). We tested the hearing capacity of Tmc1N193I/N193I mice at P16, which is close to the hearing onset (~P12), to determine if these animals were born deaf or if the HL progressed rapidly after hearing onset. We found that whereas the Tmc1N193I/+ mice had normal hearing thresholds, P16 Tmc1N193I/N193I mice had no ABR or DPOAE thresholds (Figure 1D). Therefore, unlike humans with the p.N199I mutation who have moderate, progressive HL, mice carrying the p.N193I mutation are profoundly deaf from birth.
To delve into the mechanism underlying the HL phenotype, we evaluated hair cell sensory transduction properties by examining uptake of the vital dye FM1-43, a large organic compound that can permeate functional mechanosensory transduction channels [20,21,22]. We determined that IHCs and OHCs from Tmc1N193I/N193I; Tmc2Δ/Δ mice had no FM1-43 fluorescence (Figure 1F), indicating a lack of sensory transduction in homozygous mice. We also measured sensory transduction in mutant mice by recording currents elicited by direct bundle displacement from basal IHCs. Cells from Tmc1N193I/N193I; Tmc2Δ/Δ mice had no transduction currents (−0.8 ± 0.7 pA, n = 12; Figure 1E and Supplementary Table S1), whereas cells from Tmc1N193I/+; Tmc2Δ/Δ mice had large, stimulus-induced transduction currents (−211.2 ± 16.4 pA, n = 13, p value < 0.0001, Mann–Whitney test; Figure 1E and Supplementary Table S1), indicating that the deafness phenotype of mutant mice is caused by the loss of sensory transduction in auditory hair cells, similar to that of IHCs from Tmc1Δ/Δ mice [8].
Next, we compared the number of surviving hair cells from P28 Tmc1N193I/+, Tmc1N193I/N193I and Tmc1Δ/Δ mice. Heterozygous mice showed no signs of hair cell loss in the different regions of the cochlea (Figure 1G,H and Supplementary Table S1). On the contrary, Tmc1N193I/N193I mice showed a reduced number of OHC at the cochlea middle and base compared to heterozygous animals (* p = 0.0388 for the middle and * p = 0.0475 for the base Tmc1N193I/+ (n = 5) vs Tmc1N193I/N193I (n = 9), Kruskal−-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test; Figure 1G,H and Supplementary Table S1). Also, P28 Tmc1Δ/Δ mice showed significantly fewer OHCs at the middle and base compared to the phenotypically normal Tmc1N193I/+ mice (**p = 0.0012 for the middle and *** p = 0.0007 for the base Tmc1N193I/+, n = 5, vs Tmc1Δ/Δ, n = 4, Kruskal−-Wallis followed by Dunn’s test; Figure 1G,H and Supplementary Table S1). Interestingly, Tmc1N193I/N193I mice had, on average, more surviving OHC than Tmc1Δ/Δ mice, although the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 1G,H and Supplementary Table S1). This finding suggests that even though both murine models present with profound deafness due to loss of sensory transduction, tissue degeneration was delayed in the humanized Tmc1N193I/N193I line.
3.2. Hearing Recovery Using PHP.B-CMV-hTMC1
To optimize a gene therapy approach suitable to treat human patients with DFNB7/11, we engineered viral vectors encoding a strong cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter, followed by a codon-optimized version of human TMC1 (hTMC1) and a woodchuck hepatitis virus post-transcriptional regulatory element (WPRE) sequence (for short: CMV-hTMC1), and packaged it into AAV9-PHP.B viral capsids. We injected ~1 µL (3 × 1010 gc), a dose that has been shown to be effective in transducing ~100% of IHCs and 95% of OHCs (Lee et al., 2020), into the left utricle of Tmc1Δ/Δ mice at P1-2, and recorded ABRs and DPOAEs after 4 weeks. Because the success rate of the surgical procedure is variable and we do not have a method to distinguish poor-performing constructs from failed injections, we recorded ABRs and DPOAEs from all surviving animals injected with the various viral constructs and plotted their hearing performance as a function of frequency. Tmc1Δ/Δ animals injected with CMV-hTMC1 showed prominent recovery of auditory thresholds at low and middle frequencies (Figure 2A). We wondered whether doubling the viral dose would yield an improvement in the recovery and injected P1-2 Tmc1Δ/Δ mice with 6 × 1010 gc. Increasing the viral dose clearly improved the recovery at 22.6 kHz (Figure 2B). The improvement in the auditory capacity was concomitant with a recovery of DPOAEs (Figure 2E,F), underscoring the necessity for OHC amplification to achieve normal hearing levels. However, increasing the titer of the CMV-hTMC1 did not improve the recovery at 32 kHz, the highest frequency assessed (Figure 2A,E). Importantly, we showed for the first time that hTMC1 is effective for recovering auditory function in Tmc1Δ/Δ mice in a manner similar to the mouse Tmc1 sequence [7].
Since the CMV-hTMC1 proved efficacious in Tmc1Δ/Δ mice at low and middle frequencies, we tested the construct in the humanized Tmc1N193I/N193I model. Knock-in mice injected with CMV-hTMC1 (3 × 1010 gc) showed clear recovery of ABR thresholds at low and middle frequencies, up to 22.6 kHz (Figure 2C,G).
Interestingly, increasing the dose to 6 × 1010 gc showed an improvement in the recovery at 32 kHz frequency, with a 45 dB threshold as the best recorded performance (Figure 2D,H). These results demonstrate that the CMV-hTMC1 construct is effective for recovering auditory capacity in different mouse lines, especially in the humanized Tmc1N193I/N193I model, which not only fully recovered auditory low and middle frequencies but also showed a modest recovery of hearing thresholds at high frequencies (Figure 2A–H).
Next, we evaluated whether the recovery was durable by re-testing the same Tmc1Δ/Δ and Tmc1N193I/N193I treated animals at 8- and 12-weeks of age (Figure 2I–P). Tmc1Δ/Δ mice injected with the 3 × 1010 gc dose showed an elevation of hearing thresholds over time (Figure 2I,M). For Tmc1Δ/Δ mice injected with 6 × 1010 gc, hearing thresholds at later time points were preserved, although with a slight elevation at 12 weeks compared to 4 weeks, especially at high frequencies (Figure 2J,N). Further, 8- and 12-week-old ABR and DPOAE thresholds of Tmc1N193I/N193I injected mice were more robust, even for those injected with the lower dose (Figure 2K,L,O,P). All mean ± S.E.M. and n values from Figure 2 are shown in Supplementary Table S2.
3.3. Hearing Recovery Using PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1 (+/− WPRE)
Hearing loss is more severe at high frequencies in both human and mouse, and recovery of high frequency auditory capacity by gene therapy has not been successful [23]. We were encouraged by the results showing recovery of ABR and DPOAE thresholds for the Tmc1N193I/N193I line at 32 kHz (Figure 2D,H) and decided to explore alternative promoters to boost recovery and durability. To that end, we generated a construct encoding a modified chicken beta-actin-derived promoter (termed CB6) [24], which is not as strong as the CMV promoter but may provide consistent, constitutive activity with less cell-to-cell variability (data not shown). We cloned the CB6 promoter upstream of the hTMC1 and the WPRE sequences (for short: CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE) and packaged the construct into AAV9-PHP.B viral capsids. The vectors were injected into P1-2 Tmc1Δ/Δ and Tmc1N193I/N193I mice. Tmc1Δ/Δ mice treated with the CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE (3 × 1010 gc) construct showed ABR and DPOAE recovery at lower and middle frequencies (Figure 3A, E). Importantly, around 50% of the injected animals exhibit robust ABR thresholds, with recovery at frequencies up to 22.6 kHz (best performance of 20 dB ABR threshold; Figure 3A), proving that the CB6 promoter effectively recovered hearing capacity in Tmc1Δ/Δ mice. We then tested the CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE construct in the humanized Tmc1N193I/N193I line and discovered that 10 of 13 treated mice presented full recovery of ABRs and DPOAEs with thresholds equivalent to those of wild-type mice across the entire range of frequencies tested (Figure 3C,G). This is the first report of complete hearing recovery that spans the frequency spectrum for animals that are otherwise completely deaf.
Next, we tested whether the inclusion of the WPRE element was important for the extent and durability of hearing recovery. We removed the WPRE element from the viral construct to yield CB6-hTMC1-No WPRE vectors. Similar to the Tmc1Δ/Δ mice treated with CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE, CB6-hTMC1-No WPRE injected animals recovered ABR thresholds from 5.6 to 22.6 kHz (Figure 3B,F). The same trend was observed for the CB6-hTMC1-No WPRE in the Tmc1N193I/N193I treated animals, in which five of six mice presented ABR and DPOAE thresholds that completely overlapped the Tmc1N193I/+ recordings for all the frequencies assessed (Figure 3D,H). Interestingly, whereas the auditory recovery was durable for up to 12 weeks post-injection for the Tmc1Δ/Δ and Tmc1N193I/N193I mice treated with CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE (Figure 3I,K,M,O), the hearing thresholds of animals injected with the CB6-hTMC1-No WPRE construct increased at later time points (Figure 3J,L,N,P), especially for the Tmc1Δ/Δ mice, which exhibit almost no detectable recovery at 8- and 12-weeks of age (Figure 3J,N). These results indicate that the WPRE element is important for long-term durability of hearing recovery in both HL mouse models. All mean ± S.E.M. and n values from Figure 3 are shown in Supplementary Table S3.
3.4. PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1 Optimal Dose
After identifying the most effective construct as CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE, we next tested the optimal viral dose. We injected Tmc1N193I/N193I and Tmc1Δ/Δ mice at P1-2 with doses that ranged from 3 × 109 gc to 7 × 1010 gc and evaluated their hearing capacity after 4 weeks. We determined the pure tone average (PTA) for each animal by calculating the average ABR or DPOAE threshold recorded for each pure tone and plotted them as a function of viral dose (Figure 4). A Boltzmann equation was used to fit the data and obtain a half maximal dose (EC50). Untreated controls are included in the plot for comparison (Figure 4). We determined the ABR EC50 values for Tmc1Δ/Δ and Tmc1N193I/N193I mice to be 2.5 × 1010 gc and 1.5 × 1010 gc, respectively (Figure 4A,B). Additionally, Tmc1N193I/N193I treated with the middle (3 × 1010 gc) and highest dose (7 × 1010 gc) present ABR PTAs similar to Tmc1N193I/+ mice (Figure 4B), which have normal hearing (Figure 1C,D). Importantly, the minimum dose that yielded best performance was 3 ×1010 gc since the lowest PTA in treated mutant mice were detected in animals injected with this dose (Figure 4). All mean ± S.E.M. and n values from Figure 4 are shown in Supplementary Table S4.
To evaluate potential toxicity of the gene therapy construct, we injected wild-type mice with CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE (3 × 1010 gc) and recorded ABRs and DPOAEs at 4 weeks of age. Results showed that eight of nine injected mice had normal hearing at P28 (Supplementary Figure S1A). One mouse had elevated ABR and DPOAE thresholds and presented with tissue covering the external ear canal, which is indicative of conductive HL and was probably a consequence of the surgical intervention. Injected wild-type mice did not show elevation of ABR or DPOAE thresholds at 8- and 12-weeks of age (Supplementary Figure S1A,B and Supplementary Table S6), suggesting that the therapeutic construct had minimal toxicity in normal hearing mice. Importantly, wild-type injected cochleas did not show hair cell degeneration, since the number of surviving hair cells at 12 weeks of age was similar to their uninjected counterparts (Supplementary Figure S1C,D and Supplementary Table S6).
We also performed biodistribution analysis on Tmc1Δ/Δ- and Tmc1N193I/N193I-injected animals to detect viral DNA and RNA in the injected (left) ear and off-target sites: the contralateral (right) ear, brain and liver. As expected, we found viral DNA and RNA in the injected ear and in the contralateral ear (Supplementary Figure S2), consistent with previous results showing viral distribution in contralateral ears [14,25,26]. We also found high quantities of viral DNA and RNA in the brain and at lower levels in the liver of injected animals (Supplementary Figure S2). Importantly, although viral DNA and RNA was detected in various tissues, we did not observe any overt consequences, suggesting minimal toxicity of the AAV9-PHP.B capsid and the CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE construct.
3.5. Hair Cell Survival
To evaluate whether these gene therapy strategies promoted hair cell survival, cochlear tissues from treated and control mice were collected at 12-weeks of age. Cochleae were fixed and stained against myosin 7a, which specifically labels IHCs and OHCs, to assess hair cell survival. As previously determined [7], uninjected Tmc1Δ/Δ mice showed prominent degeneration of the organ of Corti at 12 weeks of age, with only a few surviving hair cells at the apical region and complete loss of OHCs at the middle and base (average IHC/100 µm: 6.9—apex, 4.2—middle, 2.8—base; average OHC/100 µm: 11.5—apex, 0—middle, 0—base; Figure 5A,B and Supplementary Table S5). To capture the full range of responses, we selected mice for histological analysis that had good ABR recovery and mice with poor recovery. As previously reported (Nist-Lund et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2021), we found that mice with poor ABR recovery also had poor hair cell survival. Tmc1Δ/Δ mice injected with either titer of the CMV-hTMC1 constructs that had good ABR thresholds also showed survival of both IHCs and OHCs; however, only those treated with 6 × 1010 gc dose had surviving OHCs at the base (Figure 5A,B and Supplementary Table S5). The same trend was observed with Tmc1Δ/Δ mice treated with the CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE construct, where the animals injected with 7 × 1010 gc had higher hair cell counts at the base compared to those treated with 3 × 1010 gc (Figure 5A,B and Supplementary Table S5).
For the 12-week-old uninjected Tmc1N193I/N193I mice, substantial loss of both IHCs and OHCs for all the tonotopic regions of the cochlea was evident (average IHC/100 µm: 7.9—apex, 4.6—middle, 4.3—base; average OHC/100 µm: 21.2—apex, 0.1—middle, 0.1—base; Figure 5A,B). Delivery of the CMV-hTMC1 construct at both titers promoted prominent hair cell survival in Tmc1N193I/N193I mice (Figure 5C,D and Supplementary Table S5). Tmc1N193I/N193I mice treated with the CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE construct had higher IHC and OHC survival in every tonotopic region, even at the lower dose, 3 × 1010 gc (Figure 5C,D and Supplementary Table S5). Survival of IHCs and OHCs at the basal region is necessary for high frequency auditory sensitivity; therefore, it is relevant that our gene therapy strategy prevented hair cells degeneration across all cochlear turns. Importantly, the increase in the hair cell counts for the CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE injected Tmc1N193I/N193I animals was achieved using a dose of 3 × 1010 gc.
4. Discussion
In the recent years, significant improvements in gene therapy as a treatment for HL have been made in animal models [3,4,23]. The discovery of viral capsids that target hair cells with higher efficiency has enabled specific delivery of genes involved in sound perception. However, further optimization of viral constructs in animal models of genetic HL is needed prior to translation to the clinic.
Due to a lack of appropriate models, gene therapy for recessive DFNB7/11 HL has not been tested in a mouse model that bears a human TMC1 mutation. Prior work in Tmc1Δ/Δ mice provided important proof-of-concept data [5,6,7], but as there are no equivalent mutations in human TMC1, questions remain regarding relevance to the human condition. As such, we sought to develop a mouse model bearing a recessive human TMC1 mutation and focused on the p.N199I mutation [17]. We reasoned that since patients carrying this mutation have a milder form of HL, there may be an expanded capacity for clinical intervention. Patients homozygous for the p.N199I mutation present with moderate HL at 3–5 years of age, which progresses over the next decade to more severe HL. Given the phenotype and the role of TMC1 as the hair cell sensory transduction channel, we hypothesized that the p.N199I mutation may yield a hypofunctional ion channel which may be sufficient to allow for some auditory function and survival of auditory hair cells during the first decade of life. However, to our surprise, when we generated and validated the mouse model bearing the equivalent mutation, p.N193I, we discovered that the homozygous mice were profoundly deaf at the earliest time point tested, P16. Furthermore, the mice lacked sensory transduction entirely, suggesting that, contrary to our hypothesis, the p.N193I version of TMC1 was not hypofunctional; rather, the single amino acid substitution caused a complete loss of function. These unanticipated results raise several important and interesting questions.
Given that TMC1 has the same function in mice and humans and both sequences are highly conserved [27], we expect that the effect of the mutation on protein function is the same for both species. Therefore, if the p.N199I mutation causes profound loss of TMC1 function, how is it that humans bearing this mutation retain some residual auditory function? We reasoned that a compensatory mechanism that overcomes the loss of TMC1 function must exist in humans during the first decade of life. While the identity of this compensatory mechanism remains unknown, we suspect TMC2 may be playing an expanded or compensatory role in human cochlear hair cells. In mouse cochlear hair cells, TMC2 expression rises during the first postnatal week and is sufficient to support sensory transduction in inner and outer hair cells [8,13]. However, TMC2 expression begins to fall at the end of the first postnatal week while TMC1 expression begins to rise [13]. While the temporal expression patterns of TMC1 and TMC2 in human cochlear hair cells is unknown, perhaps heterochronic differences between mouse and human cochlear development may result in a longer or compensatory expression profile for human TMC2. If so, the residual auditory function in humans with p.N199I mutations may be a consequence of TMC2 function.
Regardless of the underlying cause of the residual hearing function in patients with p.N199I mutations, the presence of any auditory function implies there must be some surviving and functional hair cells during the first decade of life. As such, we suspect that these hair cells may be viable targets for gene therapy intervention and may provide an expanded capacity for auditory recovery. To investigate this hypothesis, we tested three viral constructs in Tmc1N193I/N193I mice and in the Tmc1Δ/Δ model. First, we were interested to determine if a codon optimized version of human TMC1 was capable of restoring auditory function in mice. Indeed, in both lines, we observed substantial recovery of ABR and DPOAE thresholds and enhanced survival of auditory hair cells, confirming that the codon-optimized human coding sequence could substitute for the mouse sequence. Next, we investigated a modified chicken beta-actin-promoter, CB6, which is known to drive stable expression in a variety of cell types [24]. In addition, we investigated the necessity of the post-transcriptional regulatory element, WPRE, for the durability of auditory recovery. We found that together, the CB6 promoter and the WPRE element enhanced the auditory recovery and promoted the durability of recovery in both animal models. Importantly, there was a remarkable level of auditory recovery in the Tmc1N193I/N193I mice, with ABR and DPOAE thresholds that were indistinguishable from wild-type thresholds across the entire auditory spectrum for 10 of 13 mice injected with the AAV9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1-WPRE construct. Furthermore, the recovery was durable up to 12 weeks post-injection. Injected Tmc1Δ/Δ mice also had remarkable and durable recovery with the same viral construct at a higher dose, but the recovery was reduced at the high frequency end of the spectrum. We did notice a decline in auditory function in both p.N193I mice and Tmc1Δ/Δ mice injected with the construct lacking the WPRE element, underscoring the necessity of the WPRE sequence for durable recovery of function. When the same viral construct, AAV9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1-WPRE, was injected into wild-type mice, we found no loss of auditory function in eight of nine mice. In the one mouse with elevated thresholds, we suspect the injection procedure itself may have damaged the middle ear structures, as histological analysis revealed a full complement of surviving hair cells in the injected ear.
Due to age-related decline in viral tropism for mouse outer hair cells (Lee et al., 2020), we did not explore viral injection beyond the first postnatal week. However, we note that previous work in adult non-human primates showed that the AAV9-PHP.B viral capsid, with a CBA promoter and a WPRE sequence, was capable of transfecting and driving the expression of a reporter transgene in IHCs and OHCs [28]. Interestingly, the viral titers that were effective in targeting hair cells along the different tonotopic regions of the primate cochlea were similar to those found to be effective for mice in this study (3.5 and 7 × 1011 dose, injecting 10 µL) [28]. Recently, van Beelen et al. [29] showed that AAV9-PHP.B viral capsids carrying a CMV promoter and the GFP coding sequence can transduce and drive expression of GFP in fetal and adult human hair cells in ex vivo explants of biopsied inner-ear tissue. These results suggest that the AAV9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1 + WPRE could efficiently target hair cells and drive expression of hTMC1 in non-human primate hair cells, and perhaps ultimately in humans as well.
In our mouse studies, biodistribution analysis revealed viral DNA and RNA in the contralateral ear, brain and liver, suggesting that in neonatal mice, some vector does escape the injected ear. However, as no overt consequences were noted in these animals, we conclude that systemic biodistribution of the viral construct does not cause noticeable toxicity in mice.
The difference in the response to viral gene therapy between the Tmc1N193I/N193I mice and Tmc1Δ/Δ models raises important questions. Why did the Tmc1N193I/N193I mice respond with complete recovery of auditory function, whereas the knock-out model did not? Since the knock-out model lacks expression of the full-length TMC1 protein, we suspect the consequences of this mutation may be more severe, leading to collapse of the hair cell transduction apparatus, more rapid hair cell degeneration, and somewhat diminished ability to respond to gene therapy intervention. On the other hand, the Tmc1N193I/N193I mice generate a full-length, albeit non-functional, TMC1 protein. The presence of the protein, even if non-functional, may provide structural support for the transduction complex and help stabilize the apparatus. Alternatively, the mutation may indirectly disrupt the ion channel pore but may leave other TMC1 functions intact. Since the location of N193 is in the first transmembrane domain, the Alpha-fold structure predicts that this residue is within range to interact with Q581 in the seventh transmembrane domain, which lines the channel pore [9,19]. Since the polar side chains are facing each other at 2.8–3.4 Å, mutation at the N193 site may destabilize the pore region but leave other regions of TMC1 unaffected.
Although the Tmc1N193I/N193I mice did not mimic the milder and progressive auditory phenotype seen in humans with p.N199I mutations, the remarkable gene therapy recovery in the p.N193I model may suggest that the recovery expected in the presence of the milder human phenotype may be equal to or greater than the recovery documented for mice. Furthermore, we wonder whether this level of recovery may be representative not only of the response expected for p.N199I patients, but perhaps more broadly for all recessive TMC1 point mutations that yield a full-length but non-functional TMC1 protein. More than half of recessive mutations in human TMC1 (40/70) are single amino acid substitutions, raising the possibility that patients harboring these mutations may have an expanded capacity to benefit from TMC1 gene therapy.
The Tmc1Δ/Δ mice also had remarkable auditory recovery in the low-frequency range. We suggest these mice may be a better model of functional null mutations in human TMC1 such as frame shifts, premature stop codons, and so forth. In conclusion, we suggest that the AAV9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1-WPRE vector may be well-suited as a gene therapy reagent for treatment of patients with all forms of recessive TMC1 hearing loss.
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Holt/Géléoc laboratory for helpful feedback and useful discussions. We thank Bifeng Pan for training with hair cell mechanosensory transduction current recording. We thank David Scott, Mary Herrick and Mayank Kapadia for biodistribution analysis and Phillip Wirz for vector production. We also thank Gerald Marsischky and Mantu Bhaumik for help with the Mouse Gene Manipulation Core.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biom12070914/s1, Figure S1. Wild-type mice injected with AAV2/9-PHP.B-CB6-hTMC1+WPRE have normal hearing. Figure S2. Viral nucleic acid biodistribution profile in target and off-target mouse tissue. Tables S1–S6. Values and statistics for data presented in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5 and Supplementary Figure S1, respectively.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.R.H., I.M., C.W.B., R.E.; methodology, I.M., N.K.B., O.S.-O., R.E.; validation, I.M., N.K.B., O.S.-O., R.E.; formal analysis, I.M., N.K.B., O.S.-O., R.E., J.R.H.; investigation, I.M., N.K.B., O.S.-O., R.E.; resources, C.W.B., J.R.H.; data curation, J.R.H.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M., N.K.B., O.S.-O.; writing—review and editing, I.M., N.K.B., O.S.-O., R.E., C.W.B., J.R.H.; supervision, C.W.B., J.R.H.; project administration, C.W.B., J.R.H.; funding acquisition, J.R.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
J.R.H. holds a patent on the use of AAV9-PHP.B for TMC1 gene delivery to the inner ear and is a scientific founder of Audition Therapeutics. R.E. and C.W.B. are employees of Audition Therapeutics. The authors declare no other conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by NIH/NIDCD (grant #R01DC013521), IDDRC (grant no. 1U54HD090255), the Jeff and Kimberly Barber Fund for Gene Therapy Research, Foundation Pour L’Audition and an SRA from Audition Therapeutics.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Smith R.J.H., Bale J.F., White K.R. Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Children. Lancet. 2005;365:879–890. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71047-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Omichi R., Shibata S.B., Morton C.C., Smith R.J.H. Gene Therapy for Hearing Loss. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2019;28:R65–R79. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ajay E., Gunewardene N., Richardson R. Emerging Therapies for Human Hearing Loss. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2022:1–17. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2072208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Holt J.R., Raphael Y. Introduction to the Hearing Research Special Issue on Inner Ear Gene Therapy. Hear. Res. 2020;394:108010. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Askew C., Rochat C., Pan B., Asai Y., Ahmed H., Child E., Schneider B.L., Aebischer P., Holt J.R. Tmc Gene Therapy Restores Auditory Function in Deaf Mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015;7:295ra108. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nist-Lund C.A., Pan B., Patterson A., Asai Y., Chen T., Zhou W., Zhu H., Romero S., Resnik J., Polley D.B., et al. Improved TMC1 Gene Therapy Restores Hearing and Balance in Mice with Genetic Inner Ear Disorders. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:236. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08264-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wu J., Solanes P., Nist-Lund C., Spataro S., Shubina-Oleinik O., Marcovich I., Goldberg H., Schneider B.L., Holt J.R. Single and Dual Vector Gene Therapy with AAV9-PHP.B Rescues Hearing in Tmc1 Mutant Mice. Mol. Ther. 2021;29:973–988. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pan B., Geleoc G.S., Asai Y., Horwitz G.C., Kurima K., Ishikawa K., Kawashima Y., Griffith A.J., Holt J.R. TMC1 and TMC2 Are Components of the Mechanotransduction Channel in Hair Cells of the Mammalian Inner Ear. Neuron. 2013;79:504–515. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pan B., Akyuz N., Liu X.-P., Asai Y., Nist-Lund C., Kurima K., Derfler B.H., György B., Limapichat W., Walujkar S., et al. TMC1 Forms the Pore of Mechanosensory Transduction Channels in Vertebrate Inner Ear Hair Cells. Neuron. 2018;99:736–753.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kurima K., Peters L.M., Yang Y., Riazuddin S., Ahmed Z.M., Naz S., Arnaud D., Drury S., Mo J., Makishima T., et al. Dominant and Recessive Deafness Caused by Mutations of a Novel Gene, TMC1, Required for Cochlear Hair-Cell Function. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:277–284. doi: 10.1038/ng842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vreugde S., Erven A., Kros C.J., Marcotti W., Fuchs H., Kurima K., Wilcox E.R., Friedman T.B., Griffith A.J., Bailing R., et al. Beethoven, a Mouse Model for Dominant, Progressive Hearing Loss DFNA36. Nat. Genet. 2002;30:257–258. doi: 10.1038/ng848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sloan-Heggen C.M., Bierer A.O., Shearer A.E., Kolbe D.L., Nishimura C.J., Frees K.L., Ephraim S.S., Shibata S.B., Booth K.T., Campbell C.A., et al. Comprehensive Genetic Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of 1119 Patients with Hearing Loss. Hum. Genet. 2016;135:441–450. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1648-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kawashima Y., Géléoc G.S.G., Kurima K., Labay V., Lelli A., Asai Y., Makishima T., Wu D.K., Della Santina C.C., Holt J.R., et al. Mechanotransduction in Mouse Inner Ear Hair Cells Requires Transmembrane Channel-like Genes. J. Clin. Investig. 2011;121:4796–4809. doi: 10.1172/JCI60405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Landegger L.D., Pan B., Askew C., Wassmer S.J., Gluck S.D., Galvin A., Taylor R., Forge A., Stankovic K.M., Holt J.R., et al. A Synthetic AAV Vector Enables Safe and Efficient Gene Transfer to the Mammalian Inner Ear. Nat. Biotechnol. 2017;35:280–284. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Deverman B.E., Pravdo P.L., Simpson B.P., Kumar S.R., Chan K.Y., Banerjee A., Wu W.L., Yang B., Huber N., Pasca S.P., et al. Cre-Dependent Selection Yields AAV Variants for Widespread Gene Transfer to the Adult Brain. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016;34:204–209. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee J., Nist-Lund C., Solanes P., Goldberg H., Wu J., Pan B., Schneider B.L., Holt J.R. Efficient Viral Transduction in Mouse Inner Ear Hair Cells with Utricle Injection and AAV9-PHP.B. Hear. Res. 2020;394:107882. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Imtiaz A., Maqsood A., Rehman A.U., Morell R.J., Holt J.R., Friedman T.B., Naz S. Recessive Mutations of TMC1 Associated with Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss. Neurogenetics. 2016;17:115–123. doi: 10.1007/s10048-016-0477-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lock M., Alvira M.R., Chen S., Wilson J.M. Absolute Determination of Single-Stranded and Self-Complementary Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Genome Titers by Droplet Digital PCR. Hum. Gene Ther. Methods. 2014;25:115–125. doi: 10.1089/hgtb.2013.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ballesteros A., Fenollar-Ferrer C., Swartz K.J. Structural Relationship between the Putative Hair Cell Mechanotransduction Channel TMC1 and TMEM16 Proteins. eLife. 2018;7:e38433. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Géléoc G.S.G., Holt J.R. Developmental Acquisition of Sensory Transduction in Hair Cells of the Mouse Inner Ear. Nat. Neurosci. 2003;6:1019–1020. doi: 10.1038/nn1120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Meyers J.R., MacDonald R.B., Duggan A., Lenzi D., Standaert D.G., Corwin J.T., Corey D.P. Lighting up the Senses: FM1-43 Loading of Sensory Cells through Nonselective Ion Channels. J. Neurosci. 2003;23:4054–4065. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-10-04054.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gale J.E., Marcotti W., Kennedy H.J., Kros C.J., Richardson G.P. FM1-43 Dye Behaves as a Permeant Blocker of the Hair-Cell Mechanotransducer Channel. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:7013–7025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-07013.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Delmaghani S., El-Amraoui A. Inner Ear Gene Therapies Take off: Current Promises and Future Challenges. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:2309. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Rashnonejad A., Chermahini G.A., Li S., Ozkinay F., Gao G. Large-Scale Production of Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Serotype-9 Carrying the Human Survival Motor Neuron Gene. Mol. Biotechnol. 2016;58:30–36. doi: 10.1007/s12033-015-9899-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Xia L., Yin S., Wang J. Inner Ear Gene Transfection in Neonatal Mice Using Adeno-Associated Viral Vector: A Comparison of Two Approaches. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e43218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lalwani A.K., Jero J., Mhatre A.N. Current Issues in Cochlear Gene Transfer. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 2002;7:146–151. doi: 10.1159/000058300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marcovich I., Holt J.R. Evolution and Function of Tmc Genes in Mammalian Hearing. Curr. Opin. Physiol. 2020;18:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ivanchenko M., Hanlon K.S., Devine M.K., Tenneson K., Emond F., Lafond J.-F., Kenna M.A., Corey D.P., Maguire C.A. Preclinical Testing of AAV9-PHP.B for Transgene Expression in the Non-Human Primate Cochlea. Hear. Res. 2020;394:107930. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.van Beelen E.S.A., van der Valk W.H., Verhagen T.O., de Groot J.C.M.J., Madison M.A., Shadmanfar W., Hensen E.F., Jansen J.C., van Benthem P.P.G., Holt J.R., et al. Efficient Viral Transduction in Fetal and Adult Human Inner Ear Explants with AAV9-PHP.B Vectors. Biomolecules. 2022;12:816. doi: 10.3390/biom12060816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.