Pharmacokinetics of Buprenorphine Buccal Film and Orally-administered Oxycodone in a Respiratory Study: An Analysis of Secondary Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and oxygen saturation as markers of abuse potential after administration of buprenorphine buccal film (BBF) and immediate-release (IR) oxycodone.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of data from a phase I randomized controlled trial. A total of 19 healthy subjects who self-identified as recreational opioid users were enrolled, with 15 completing the study. Subjects were administered 300, 600, and 900 µg BBF; 30 and 60 mg orally-administered oxycodone; and placebo. For PK analysis, blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h postdose. Respiratory drive/ventilatory response to hypercapnia and oxygen saturation were evaluated before dosing and up to 8 h after administration of test drugs.

Results

Median time to maximum concentration (T_max) was 2.17 h for 900 µg BBF and 1.17 h for 60 mg oxycodone and was similar across all doses for each drug. Mean maximum concentration (C_max) was 1.06 ng/mL for 900 µg BBF and 132 ng/mL for 60 mg oxycodone. The abuse quotient, defined as C_max/T_max, was substantially higher for oxycodone compared to BBF. Respiratory depression (maximum decrease in minute ventilation) was similar for all 3 doses of BBF, consistent with a potential ceiling effect. In addition, respiratory depression occurred sooner with oxycodone vs BBF, and a greater mean decrease in oxygen saturation was observed for oxycodone 30- and 60-mg doses, compared with BBF.

Conclusion

These results indicate that BBF may have a decreased risk of abuse and respiratory depression compared with the full µ-opioid receptor agonist oxycodone.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03996694.

Key Summary Points

Why carry out this study?

Overdose of opioid analgesics, with associated respiratory depression and risk of death, can occur either during medical use or from drug abuse; there is a need to develop safer opioids with a lower potential for abuse.

Pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, such as high maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and short time to reach Cmax (Tmax), are likely related to the abuse potential/drug liking of opioid analgesics.

What did the study ask?

Buprenorphine, a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist, was evaluated in comparison with oxycodone, a full µ-opioid receptor agonist, for PK properties and respiratory depression effects.

What was learned from the study?

Buprenorphine buccal film (BBF) compared to immediate-release oxycodone was associated with increased Tmax, lower Cmax, and slower respiratory depression in human subjects administered therapeutic doses of each drug.

These results suggest that BBF may have a decreased risk for abuse compared to oxycodone.

Introduction

A major concern of the opioid epidemic is the occurrence of overdose by respiratory depression, either from abuse or medical use of opioids [1, 2]. Opioids induce respiratory depression (decreased minute ventilation) that is measured by increased end-tidal carbon dioxide or elevated arterial carbon dioxide. In addition, reduced minute ventilation by opioids may lead to decreased oxygen saturation, which can be assessed by a variety of instruments, including pulse oximetry and smart wearable devices in the field [3, 4]. Oxygen saturation below 90% may be considered an indication of respiratory depression, although some patients can recover after oxygen saturation of 80% or lower, depending on patient characteristics [5–7]. In contrast to full µ-opioid receptor agonists that show dose-dependent effects on respiratory depression, buprenorphine is a partial µ-opioid receptor agonist analgesic [8], with evidence of a ceiling effect on respiratory depression [9, 10]. Buprenorphine is classified as a Schedule III drug because it has a lower abuse potential than full µ-opioid receptor agonists, which are Schedule II drugs [10, 11]. As a caveat, subcutaneously administered buprenorphine (as high as 2 mg) led to euphoria in nondependent subjects, although euphoria is more common with opioids administered intravenously [12, 13].

Pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of opioid formulations can affect both abuse and respiratory depression. Individuals who abuse opioids typically prefer a high maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max) and short peak time to attain C_max (T_max) for the greatest, fastest onset of euphoria [14]. High plasma concentrations also increase risk of respiratory depression [15]. For oxycodone, reported C_max has ranged from 34.1 ng/mL (immediate-release [IR] 15 mg/650 mg oxycodone/acetaminophen) to 66.2 ng/mL (IR 30 mg/1300 mg oxycodone/acetaminophen), and T_max ranged from 0.4 h (IR 15 mg/650 mg oxycodone/acetaminophen) to 8.2 h (IR 30 mg/1300 mg oxycodone/acetaminophen) [16]. For buprenorphine, reported C_max has ranged from 0.2 (for 75 μg buprenorphine buccal film [BBF]) to 6.4 ng/mL (for 16 mg sublingually administered buprenorphine), and T_max ranged from 0.75 h (16 mg sublingually administered buprenorphine) to 3 h (75 μg BBF) [17, 18].

Abuse quotient is an objective, quantitative measure to compare abuse potential across opioid formulations of the same molecule and dose that is based on PK parameters: C_max/T_max. Higher values suggest greater risk for abuse of the drug when using the abuse quotient measure. Abuse quotient values of 5.5–8.6 have been reported in the literature for intact (i.e., not manipulated by crushing or other methods) morphine and oxycodone formulations [11, 19–21].

This analysis of PK and oxygen saturation was conducted to examine secondary outcomes from a previously published study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03996694) [22]. The primary outcome of the initial study was the maximum decrease in minute ventilation (E_max) after administration of BBF (BELBUCA®) 300 µg, 600 µg, and 900 µg and IR oxycodone 30 mg and 60 mg by measurement of the ventilatory response to hypercapnia (VRH). Results showed that oxycodone decreased respiratory drive in a dose-dependent manner vs placebo, and BBF did not significantly decrease respiratory drive at any dose tested [22]. This report summarizes the exploratory PK and abuse quotient endpoints and the secondary oxygen saturation endpoint as indications of abuse potential and respiratory depression after administration of BBF and IR oxycodone in this phase I study.

Methods

This was an analysis of secondary outcomes from a previously published phase I study. Detailed methods were previously described [22].

Ethics

The authors have received approval from an institutional review board (Midlands Independent Review Board, Lenexa, KS, USA). This study was conducted in accordance with the principles and requirements of the Declaration of Helsinki and International Council for Harmonization E6 Guidelines for good clinical practice (European Medicines Agency/Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use).

All subjects were informed verbally and in writing regarding the objectives, procedures, and risks of study participation. The subjects signed the informed consent form that contained information about the objectives of the study, the procedures followed during the study, and the risks and restrictions of the study, with special reference to possible side effects of the medication and potential interactions. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03996694).

Study Design

Participants were healthy individuals who self-identified as recreational opioid users and were not dependent on opioids, as confirmed with a naloxone challenge test. This study utilized a double-blind, double-dummy, 6-treatment, 6-period, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover design (Fig. 1). Each treatment was separated by a 7-day washout period to avoid any potential carryover effects. Study treatments were placebo; BBF 300 µg, 600 µg, and 900 µg; and IR oxycodone 30 mg and 60 mg [22]. The doses for BBF and oxycodone were selected on the basis of estimates of equianalgesic dosing. The first patient was screened on July 8, 2019. The clinical study protocol was reviewed and approved by an institutional review board.

Fig. 1.

Study design. BBF indicates buprenorphine buccal film; oxy, oxycodone. Reproduced from Webster et al. [22], under the CC BY-NC 4.0 Open Access License

Assessments

During the treatment phase, blood samples were collected before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after dosing for PK analysis. Buprenorphine and oxycodone were analyzed in plasma samples using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection according to validated analytical methods. PK parameters were evaluated using noncompartmental methods, and descriptive summary statistics were calculated for C_max, T_max, and abuse quotient (C_max/T_max).

Respiratory drive was evaluated by VRH as previously published [22]. The equipment was calibrated with known CO₂ concentrations prior to each assessment. During VRH, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation was measured by pulse oximetry from at least 15 min before dosing until at least 8 h after dose. Pearson correlations for T_max and C_max with E_max minute ventilation and change in pupil size from baseline were analyzed. P values were calculated by 2-tailed tests with a null hypothesis of r = 0.

Results

In total, 19 participants enrolled and were included in the safety population, 15 completed the study (completer population), and 16 completed at least 2 treatments (partial completer population). Among the 4 subjects who did not complete the study, 1 was lost to follow-up, another subject withdrew, 1 had a positive urine drug screen finding, and 1 subject experienced an adverse event of idioventricular rhythm several hours after receiving a 600-µg dose of BBF and was discontinued at that point. This adverse event was judged by the investigator as likely related to the test drug. Most patients enrolled were men (94.7%), White (73.7%), and not of Hispanic or Latino ethnicity (73.7%); the mean age was 33.1 years (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of demographics

Category	Randomized/safety (N = 19)	Completer (N = 15)	Partial completer (N = 16)
Sex, n (%)
Female	1 (5.3)	1 (6.7)	1 (6.3)
Male	18 (94.7)	14 (93.3)	15 (93.8)
Race, n (%)
White	14 (73.7)	12 (80.0)	13 (81.3)
Black or African American	1 (5.3)	1 (6.7)	1 (6.3)
Asian	1 (5.3)	1 (6.7)	1 (6.3)
American Indian or Alaska Native	3 (15.8)	1 (6.7)	1 (6.3)
Ethnicity, n (%)
Hispanic or Latino	5 (26.3)	3 (20.0)	3 (18.8)
Not Hispanic or Latino	14 (73.7)	12 (80.0)	13 (81.3)
Age (y)a	33.1 (4.5)	32.9 (4.4)	32.8 (4.3)
Weight (kg)a	78.6 (15.8)	80.6 (16.7)	79.3 (16.9)
Height (cm)a	177.1 (8.4)	177.4 (9.3)	177.0 (9.1)
BMI (kg/m2)a	24.9 (3.7)	25.4 (3.8)	25.1 (3.9)

Reproduced from Webster et al. [22], under the CC BY-NC 4.0 Open Access License

BMI body mass index

^aValues, mean (SD)

PK

Plasma drug concentration increased with increasing dose, as expected, with most separation between doses occurring at 2 h postdose for buprenorphine and 1 h postdose for oxycodone (Fig. 2). T_max occurred earlier, and C_max and the abuse quotient were higher with oxycodone from the IR product than with buprenorphine from BBF (Table 2). T_max was similar across doses, while C_max and the abuse quotient increased with higher doses.

Fig. 2.

Mean (± SD) plasma concentration of a buprenorphine and b oxycodone over time, (N = 19)

Table 2.

Pharmacokinetic parameters

	Median Tmax (min, max), h	Mean Cmax (SD)	Mean (SD) abuse quotient
Buprenorphine
300 µg	2.15 (2.13, 3.20)	0.413 (0.215)	0.17 (0.09)
600 µg	3.13 (1.12, 6.00)	0.796 (0.853)	0.30 (0.20)
900 µg	2.17 (2.13, 6.00)	1.06 (0.414)	0.41 (0.11)
Oxycodone
30 mg	1.15 (0.63, 3.15)	65.8 (19.1)	67.4 (39.2)
60 mg	1.17 (0.67, 6.0)	132 (46.2)	110 (75.3)

Correlations

Pearson’s correlation between T_max and maximum change from baseline in pupil size was moderate (r = 0.31; p = 0.03) for BBF, with no appreciable correlation (r = 0.09; p = 0.64) for oxycodone. For BBF, the maximum decrease in pupil size occurred from 2 to 3 h postdose. For oxycodone, the maximum decrease in pupil size occurred from 0.5 to 2 h postdose. Pearson’s correlation between T_max and E_max was moderate (r = 0.36; p = 0.01) for BBF and very small (r = 0.16; p = 0.38) for oxycodone. For BBF, mean E_max was observed at 3 h postdose for 300- and 600-µg doses and at 4 h for 900 µg, whereas for oxycodone, mean E_max values occurred at 1 and 2 h postdose for 30- and 60-mg doses, respectively [22]. No compelling correlations were observed between C_max and either E_max or change in pupil size from baseline.

Oxygen Saturation

With oxycodone, oxygen saturation decreased in an apparent dose-dependent manner in the first hour after dosing, after which the dose-dependent effect was less pronounced (Fig. 3). The lowest mean oxygen saturation with oxycodone was 95%, 1.5 h after dosing with oxycodone 60 mg. BBF resulted in change to oxygen saturation similar to that observed with placebo (Fig. 3). Only one subject had a clinically significant decrease in oxygen saturation (to 86%, approximately 1.5 h after dosing with oxycodone 60 mg).

Fig. 3.

Mean (± SD) oxygen saturation in response to BBF and oxycodone administration, (N = 15). BBF indicates buprenorphine buccal film; Oxy oxycodone. Consort flowchart and checklist: not applicable because the primary results of the study were already published; this report focuses on a secondary analysis

Discussion

Previous studies have shown that faster T_max and higher C_max in opioids indicate a higher risk for abuse [14]. Although it can be challenging to interpret the clinical implications of pharmacokinetic differences across molecules, IR oxycodone illustrated a faster T_max and a higher C_max compared with BBF at estimated equianalgesic doses. These results were expected, given the difference in onset of action for each drug. The abuse quotient was substantially higher for both oxycodone doses compared with all 3 BBF doses. The abuse quotient may not be directly comparable across different molecules, but it is intuitive that the slower increase in plasma concentration with BBF may make it less appealing for abuse than an IR oxycodone formulation. T_max was significantly moderately correlated with maximum change from baseline in pupil size as well as E_max for BBF, which suggests that later T_max among subjects receiving this drug may be related to improved oxygen saturation and less drug liking. Moreover, previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between drug liking and pupil diameter [23, 24], and delayed miosis seen with BBF is consistent with the lower abuse quotient compared to IR oxycodone observed in this study. In the current study, oxygen saturation showed an initial dose-dependent decrease up to 1 h with oxycodone, while levels for BBF remained similar to those for placebo. Taken together, these results suggest that BBF was well tolerated with regard to respiratory function and may have a lower potential for abuse relative to oxycodone.

Limitations

Limitations of this study include the small sample size (N = 16 partial completer population) and that differences in drug release of BBF and IR oxycodone in this study affect their PK profiles and the abuse quotient. In addition, comparing abuse quotient of different molecules may not represent a difference in abuse potential because of differences in opioid properties and potency across molecules. This was a single-dose study, and results may not be applicable to patients receiving long-term therapy. Moreover, mechanisms of respiratory depression (and death from overdose) are complicated by polypharmacy, in which drug interactions or additive effects may occur. This was illustrated in an animal study where a combination of buprenorphine and benzodiazepine was administered and led to early-onset sedation and respiratory depression in rats [25].

Conclusions

Respiratory depression is the leading cause of death from opioids [26]. Opioids slow breathing and reduce tidal volume, which decreases oxygen saturation in the blood [2, 3]. Abuse increases the risk of taking doses of opioids that can cause respiratory depression. Results from this study suggest that BBF leads to decreased risk of abuse and respiratory depression compared with full µ-opioid receptor agonists such as oxycodone, which has important safety implications.