Skip to main content
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology logoLink to Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
. 2022 Jul 12;10:857093. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.857093

Forging the Frontiers of Image-Guided Neurosurgery—The Emerging Uses of Theranostics in Neurosurgical Oncology

Fred C Lam 1,2,*,, Uyanga Tsedev 1,3,, Ekkehard M Kasper 2, Angela M Belcher 1,3
PMCID: PMC9315239  PMID: 35903794

Introduction

A Brief History of Neurosurgical Oncology

Modern neurosurgical treatment of brain tumors involves maximal safe resection of tumorous tissue whilst preserving adjacent normal neurovascular anatomy in order to minimize the risk of neurological injury to the patient (Sunaert, 2006). A surgical series of 8 patients performed by renowned Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon Dr. Walter Edward Dandy, published in 1933, involved surgical removal of the right cerebral hemisphere with preservation of the right basal ganglia, in right-handed patients who presented with left-sided paralysis due to their right hemispheric tumors (Dandy, 1933). This pioneering report demonstrated the invasiveness of malignant brain tumors despite heroic surgical efforts, as patients inevitably succumbed to residual disease in the preserved basal ganglia, with invasion into the opposite hemisphere, emphasizing both the need for better visualization of tumor cells within the brain during surgery and the necessity for adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy to treat residual tumor burden. Further pioneering work throughout the past century by other neurosurgical greats including: Drs. Harvey Cushing, William Halsted, Fedor Krause, Victor Horsley, Wilder Penfield, Gazi Yaşargil, Rolando Del Maestro, and others, paved the way for the advent of cortical brain mapping techniques, use of the operating microscope, and stereotactic surgery—all of which are now common tools in the neurosurgeon’s armamentarium to enable safe surgical resection of brain tumors (exquisitely reviewed in “A History of Neuro-Oncology,” by Dr. Rolando Del Maestro) (Del Maestro, 2006).

Further pioneering work published in 1916 by Dr. Dandy and his then senior neurosurgery resident, Dr. George J. Heuer, reported the localization of brain tumors in one hundred consecutive patients using x-ray roentgenography (Heuer and Dandy, 1916). This was followed by a series of studies by Dr. Dandy in which he injected air, and later, contrast agents, into the ventricular and lumbar subarachnoid spaces to diagnosis and localize brain and spinal tumors using x-rays (Dandy, 1918; Dandy, 1919). The herculean efforts of renowned neurologist Dr. Egas Antonio Ceatano de Moniz and neurosurgeon Dr. Pedro Almeida Lima in Lisbon, Portugal, in developing the technique of cerebral angiography for the localization and visualization of the blood supply of brain tumors, led to Dr. Lima’s documentation of over 2000 angiograms in 1949, paving the way for the indispensable use of cerebral angiography in modern day neurosurgery for the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors and the coiling of cerebral aneurysms (Moniz, 1927; Del Maestro, 2006).

Intraoperative Image-Guided Technology in Neurosurgical Oncology

The use of intravenous fluorescein tagged with radioactive 131iodine to differentiate tumor tissue from normal brain under ultraviolet (UV) light by Dr. George Eugene Moore in 1947 at the University of Minnesota was one of the first reports of exploiting the inherent leakiness of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) around brain tumors to allow for the extravasation of a radioactive fluorophore to enhance visualization of brain tumors. This landmark discovery paved the way for the introduction of radioactive nucleotides such as 18fluorodeoxyglucose for use with computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) to localize metabolically active tumor cells in the brain. However, it was the advent of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) by Professors Felix Block from Stanford University and Edward Purcell from Harvard, for which they were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1952, that led to the introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, which has since revolutionized our ability to visualize with stunning resolution the neurovascular anatomy of the brain and spinal cord. Since then, adaptations such as functional MRI (fMRI) (Ogawa et al., 1990; Kwong et al., 1992) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (O'Donnell and Westin, 2011; Alexander et al., 2007) have allowed for the neurosurgeon to superimpose multiple layers of imaging information on top of contrast agent enhanced MRI sequences to allow for rendering of the spatial characteristics of brain tumors in eloquent regions of the brain (using fMRI) with respect to neighboring neuronal fiber tracts (using DTI) to achieve maximal safe resection of brain tumors (Algethami et al., 2021).

Incorporating different image-guided technologies into the operative neurosurgical workflow varies depending on the modality that is used. Many neurosurgical centers now have access to portable neuronavigation systems such as the Medtronic StealthStation™ (Minneapolis, MN, United States) that occupy minimal footprint in the operating room and can overlay high resolution CT or MRI imaging with fMRI or DTI images to allow for fixed 3D mapping of intracranial lesions for presurgical planning Algethami et al. (2021). The disadvantage of these fixed imaging systems is that they do not allow for real-time evaluation of intra-operative resection margins, unlike intraoperative MRI (iMRI), which currently provides the highest quality resolution of EoR and assessment of changes in the brain throughout the course of a tumor resection (Rogers et al., 2021). However, given the large footprint required to accommodate an MRI scanner, the need for specialized operating rooms with MRI compatible (non-ferromagnetic) instruments that are required to allow for positioning of the patient in and out of the scanner whilst providing adequate surgical access throughout the course of the operation, and the high costs associated with purchasing and installation of the MRI scanner and the MRI compatible instruments, the use of iMRI is currently limited to specialized neurosurgical centers that can afford this technology (Mislow et al., 2009; Chicoine et al., 2011).

Despite the improvements in preoperative imaging planning workflow, the surgeon is often times limited in their ability to differentiate tumor tissue from adjacent normal neuroanatomy under direct white light microscopy. This is particularly challenging during resection of infiltrative tumors such as high-grade gliomas, the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults. To overcome this limitation, fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS) using tumor-targeting fluorophores have steadily been introduced into the neurosurgeon’s armamentarium (Vahrmeijer et al., 2013). The FDA-approved protoporphryin IX prometabolite 5-aminolevulenic acid (5-ALA) has yielded promising results in increasing the EoR for high-grade gliomas (Stummer et al., 2006; Della Puppa et al., 2014a; Belloch et al., 2014), but has shown no clear benefit in lower-grade disease where tumor cells are less metabolically active, thereby decreasing the levels of intraoperative fluorescence to allow for maximal safe EoR (Mirza et al., 2022). Furthermore, the need to orally administer 5-ALA to the patient 2.5–3 h prior to induction of anesthesia followed by strict avoidance of direct exposure to sunlight or bright room lights for 24 h after 5-ALA administration due to increased skin photosensitivity (Tonn and Stummer, 2008) and the relative high cost of 5-ALA, have limited its widespread use. Alternatively, the FDA-approved fluorescent dye sodium fluorescein, which has been widely used and tested for safety in the field of ophthalmology, is inexpensive, can be administered intravenously at the time of surgery, and relies on the leakiness of the surrounding BBB to accumulate at the site of high grade brain tumors (Acerbi et al., 2014; Cavallo et al., 2018). Unlike 5-ALA, fluorescein does not depend on the metabolic activity of tumor cells and could lead to false-positive identification of non-tumorous cells surrounding the leaky BBB, however several studies comparing fluorescein-guided to white light resections have demonstrated a high level of accuracy in identification of tumor tissues (Kuroiwa et al., 1998; Kuroiwa et al., 1999; Acerbi et al., 2013; Acerbi et al., 2014). The much lower cost of fluorescein and its safety profile supported by the ophthalmologic literature have increased its prevalence for use in neurosurgical procedures (Kwiterovich et al., 1991; Kwan et al., 2006). Disadvantages of 5-ALA and sodium fluorescein are that while both fluorophores can clearly demarcate tumor boundaries, they lack depth of tissue penetration with laser excitation in their respective wavelengths and their signal can be masked by endogenous cellular autofluorescence (Acerbi et al., 2014; Mirza et al., 2022). More recently, the FDA-approved near-infrared fluorophore indocyanine green (ICG), traditionally used in angiography procedures, has gained popularity in FGS. Like fluorescein, ICG also accumulates at the tumor site through leaky BBB vasculature but has also been shown to achieve endocytosis inside tumor cells (Onda et al., 2016), whereas fluorescein does not, allowing for higher sensitivity of detection of tumor cells during surgery which correlates well with gadolinium contrast-enhancing tumor signal on preoperative MRI (Lee et al., 2016).

Evidence for Using Intraoperative Imaging Technology to Maximize Extent of Resection to Improve Survival Outcomes in Neurosurgical Oncology

Successful outcomes in neurosurgical oncology is increasingly being defined by the EoR to achieve a gross total resection (GTR) or maximal safe cytoreduction (Rogers et al., 2021). Several studies have reported the EoR as the single most significant variable for impacting survival in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent high grade gliomas (HGG) (Lacroix et al., 2001; Sanai et al., 2011; Oppenlander et al., 2014). Similarly, a GTR or maximal safe EoR were associated with significantly longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with low grade gliomas compared to performing a biopsy alone (Roelz et al., 2016; Scherer et al., 2020).

Studies comparing across image-guided surgical modalities demonstrated that iMRI was superior over both 5-ALA FGS and conventional neuronavigation approaches in obtaining GTRs and led to prolonged survival (Knauth et al., 1999; Bohinski et al., 2001; Senft et al., 2011; Golub et al., 2020). A recent Cochrane Database network meta-analysis comparing image-guided technologies to maximize EoR for resection of gliomas yielded a paucity of high level evidence supporting the use of iMRI or 5-ALA in achieving maximal EoR with heavily biased results and inconclusive evidence regarding improvements in PFS and OS (Fountain et al., 2021). Furthermore, a brief cost benefit analysis suggested that image-guided surgery, iMRI, and 5-ALA FGS in particular, are associated with increased costs compared to conventional surgical resections, and therefore further research and randomized controlled trials will be needed in order to determine whether these modalities should be offered as standard of care for resection of brain tumors (Fountain et al., 2021). A more recent frequentist network meta-analysis was published identifying 23 studies with 2,643 patients comparing 5-ALA, sodium fluorescein, and iMRI, to no image guidance for the resection of HGGs (Naik et al., 2022). This study found that image guidance using iMRI, fluorescein, and 5-ALA led to greater rates of GTR, improved PFS, and OS compared to no image guidance. However, both meta-analyses confirmed that future studies are needed to assess superiority between modalities as well as other metrics including duration of surgery while using image guided techniques and cost.

One caveat that must be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of the aforementioned network meta-analysis is that the majority of studies using 5-ALA to maximize EoR were in patients with HGGs that were located in the supratentorial space (i.e. Frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes of the brain) (Stummer et al., 2006). These are regions of the brain that are relatively easy to access surgically, and patients can generally tolerate aggressive tumor tissue debulking without significant neurological sequelae. Thus, conventional neurosurgical approaches are more likely to yield EoR margins and outcomes that are comparable to image-guided approaches. However, lesions that are located in more sensitive regions of the brain (i.e. the brainstem, posterior fossa) may benefit from image-guided surgery in order to better appreciate tumor margins around brainstem nuclei and nerve fiber tracts that control essential neurological and life-sustaining functions while achieving maximal safe EoR (Della Puppa et al., 2014b; Della Puppa et al., 2015; Algethami et al., 2021). In fact, the importance of intraoperative visualization for maximal safe brain tumor resection has been recognized by the global neurosurgical oncology community, as evidenced by the inaugural 2021 conference on intraoperative visualization and the connectome, organized by the prestigious Society for Neuro-Oncology (https://www.soc-neuro-onc.org/WEB/WEB/Event_Content/Intraoperative_Visualization_and_the_Connectome.aspx).

The Emerging Uses of Nanoscale Materials to Augment Fluorescence-Guided Neurosurgery

Forging the frontiers of image-guided neurosurgery is the emerging use of nanoscale materials for the detection and treatment of tumor cells in neurosurgical procedures. Nanoscale materials are self-assembling polymeric systems measuring less than 1,000 nm in their longest axis. These systems can be organic or inorganic in nature, and can be functionalized with targeting moieties to facilitate delivery across the BBB into the CNS with the ability to then deliver payload to specific cells of interest in the brain. Nanoparticles (NP) that have been developed for potential CNS applications typically have a maximal diameter of ∼100 nm to facilitate trafficking across the tight junctions of the BBB. We previously developed a liposomal NP of ∼100 nm in diameter that was functionalized with a fluorophore and transferrin to enable transferrin receptor-mediated transcytosis across the BBB to deliver dual combination therapies to glioma brain tumors in mice (Lam et al., 2018). Other researchers have developed mesoporous silica NPs, magnetic iron oxide NPs, gold NPs, copolymers, and carbon nanotubes, for delivery of cargo into the brain (a summary of these nanoplatforms with accompanying references are provided in Table 1). Functionalization of NPs with surface moieties such as transferrin, folate, cyclic RGD peptide, or angiopep-2, that enable trafficking across the BBB and targeting to tumor cells in vivo can improve specificity of delivery, although the effectiveness of receptor targeting of NPs in solid tumors has been recently questioned (Obaid, 2021 #233). We have provided a tabular summary of these NP formulations, specific targeting ligands and sequences, along with potential applications for use in neurosurgical oncology for ease of reference for our readers (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Summary of different physicochemical and functional properties of nanoparticles with their potential clinical applications in neurosurgical oncology.

Types of nanoparticles Liposomes/polymersomes Jiang et al. (2012), Zong et al. (2014), Shi et al. (2015)
Iron oxide NP Alphandéry et al. (2015)
Silica NP Wang et al. (2015)
Gold NP Fan et al. (2014)
Quantum dots Onoshima et al. (2015)
Carbon nanotubes Wang et al. (2012), Ceppi et al. (2019)
Bacteriophage Ghosh et al. (2012), Yi et al. (2012), Staquicini et al. (2020), Wang et al. (2021)
Copolymers Ke et al. (2017)
BBB trafficking receptors, peptide sequences, and ligands Mannose Du et al. (2014)
Glucose Du et al. (2014)
Lactate Pérez-Escuredo et al. (2016)
Neutral amino acids Nawashiro et al. (2005), Kobayashi et al. (2008), Abbott et al. (2010), Geier et al. (2013)
Cationic amino acids Barar et al. (2016)
Anionic amino acids Smith (2000), Hawkins et al. (2006)
Oligopeptides and polypeptides Butte et al. (2014), Dardevet et al. (2015)
Transferrin Wang et al. (2009), Zhou et al. (2021)
Folate Wang et al. (2009), Zhou et al. (2021)
LRP1 Jiang et al. (2018)
Tumor targeting peptide sequences, ligands, and receptors RGD Qin et al. (2011), Sharma et al. (2013), Zong et al. (2014), Liu et al. (2015), Shi et al. (2015), Wang et al. (2016), Joshi et al. (2017), Ke et al. (2017), Yao et al. (2017)
NGR Sharma et al. (2017)
CGKRK Sharma et al. (2017)
Angiopep-2 Gao et al. (2014)
Chlorotoxin Veiseh et al. (2009), Wang et al. (2020)
HA Jiang et al. (2012)
CD133 Jing et al. (2016)
Folate Cho et al. (2019)
Transferrin Dixit et al. (2015)
LRP1 Jiang et al. (2018)
Potential clinical applications Drug delivery to brain tumors d'Angelo et al. (2019), Dixit et al. (2015)
Imaging of brain tumors Jing et al. (2016), Carr et al. (2018)
Photo-thermal-accoustic therapy for brain tumors Golubewa et al. (2020)
Anti-tumor gene therapy Staquicini et al. (2020)
Fluorescence-guided tumor surgery Butte et al. (2014), Cho et al. (2018), Cho et al. (2019)

The versatility of a single nanoscale delivery system to be multiplexed with detection and treatment capabilities defines it as a theranostic (d'Angelo et al., 2019). The ability of a theranostic to visualize tumor cells in vivo during surgery and track cellular biodistribution and treatment response throughout the course of adjuvant therapy, can allow for time and cost savings while adopting a personalized medicine approach to improve outcomes (d'Angelo et al., 2019; Mendes et al., 2018). For example, a fluorescent-labelled theranostic NP conjugated to a CD133 monoclonal antibody has recently been shown to enable NIR tracking of patient-derived glioma cancer stem cells in an orthotopic mouse model of glioma (Jing et al., 2016). Finally, a fluorescent-tagged monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), cetuximab-IRDye800, has recently been shown in a first-in-human trial demonstrating the ability to identify tumor tissue in glioma patients in real-time under NIR FGS with high correlations to pre-operative gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and post-operative histopathological staining of tissue specimens (Miller et al., 2018), emphasizing the timeliness and importance of discussing novel brain tumor-targeting theranostic technologies that can potentially surpass the sole reliance of the heterogeneously leaky BBB around high grade tumors allowing for delivery of 5-ALA or ICG.

We previously leveraged the use of M13 bacteriophage (M13 ϕ)—highly specialized and modular nanoscale filamentous protein particles that can be genetically tuned for programmable assembly, chemically modified for surface functionalization of imaging, chemical, or antigenic moieties, for in vivo theranostic applications. These applications have included: Tumor-targeted imaging and drug delivery (Ghosh et al., 2012); Image-guided solid tumor resection (Yi et al., 2012; Ghosh et al., 2014); And high contrast short-wavelength infrared (SWIR) fluorescence imaging of vascular and lymphatic structures (Ceppi et al., 2019; Lin et al., 2019). In this mini review and opinion piece, we introduce proof-of-concept data demonstrating our ability to functionalize M13 ϕ for systemic delivery to detect glioma brain tumors using SWIR fluorescence imaging in a patient-derived mouse model of glioma, demonstrating the potential for the use of M13 ϕ as a brain tumor theranostic.

Results

We previously published on our expertise to generate stable rod-like filamentous M13 ϕ with a narrow diameter of 5 nm and length of 900 nm that can be conjugated with various NIR fluorescent dyes or single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) to enable SWIR imaging of ovarian tumors and lymph nodes in a mouse model of ovarian cancer (Ghosh et al., 2012; Yi et al., 2012; Ghosh et al., 2014; Ceppi et al., 2019). We hypothesized that the extremely narrow diameter and high length-to-diameter aspect ratio of the M13 ϕ would allow it passage across the tight endothelial gap junctions of the BBB if functionalized with a known peptide moiety with proven ability to achieve endocytosis across the BBB with the ability to target glioma tumor cells in the brain following systemic delivery. Several such peptides have been identified including angiopep-2 (Liu et al., 2019), PepC7 (Li et al., 2012), and GL1 (Ho et al., 2010), amongst others, however, there has only been one peptide to-date that has been FDA-approved for in-human use to assist in FGS of higher grade brain tumors—the 36 amino-acid peptide chlorotoxin (CTX), derived from the venom of the Leiurus quinquestriatus scorpion (Veiseh et al., 2009; Dardevet et al., 2015; Cohen-Inbar and Zaaroor, 2016). CTX peptide and CTX conjugates have demonstrated the ability to traverse the BBB and achieve binding to over 80% of tumor cells in an intracranial orthotopic model of glioma (Wang et al., 2020). To achieve functionalization of M13 ϕ with CTX, we cloned in the 108 base pair CTX gene sequence upstream of the phage p3 capping protein insertion site. We hypothesized that conjugation of CTX-M13 ϕ with either the NIR II IR1050 dye (Figure 1A, left panel, schematic) or SWCNT (Figure 1B, left panel, schematic) to the p8 coat proteins of M13 ϕ would allow detection of CTX-M13 ϕ at the site of patient-derived GBM22 brain tumors in an intracranial orthotopic xenograft murine model of GBM using SWIR imaging.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Chlorotoxin (CTX)-functionalized M13 phage conjugated to IR1050 dye or single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) detect GBM22 human glioma tumors using short-wavelength near infrared II (SWIR) imaging in an intracranial orthotopic xenograft model of human glioblastoma. (A) Left panel—schematic of IR1050-CTX-M13 phage. Right panels—brightfield image of the skull of a GBM22 mouse (red dotted circle). In vivo SWIR imaging through the skull localizes IR1050-CTX-M13 phage signal at the site of a GBM22 tumor in the right frontal hemisphere (black dotted circle). Background SWIR signal caused by uptake of IR1050-CTX-M13 phage in the occipital bone (green dotted circle). Ex vivo SWIR imaging shows uptake of IR1050-CTX-M13 phage in a GBM22 tumor in the mouse brain. (B) Left panel—schematic of SWCNT-CTX-M13 phage. Right panels—brightfield image of the skull of a GBM22 mouse (red dotted circle). In vivo SWIR imaging through the skull localizes SWCNT-CTX-M13 phage signal at the site of a GBM22 tumor (black dotted circle). Background SWIR signal caused by uptake of SWNT-CTX-M13 phage in the occipital bone (green dotted circle). Ex vivo SWIR imaging shows uptake of SWCNT-CTX-M13 phage in a GBM22 tumor. White scale bar = 1 cm.

Brightfield images of the heads of GBM22 mice show their skulls outlined in red, their occipital boney prominence outlined in green, and the site of intracranial GBM22 tumor induction in the right posterior frontal lobe, outlined in black (Figures 1A,B, right panel, brightfield images). Twenty-four hours following tail vein injection of either IR1050-CTX-M13 or SWCNT-CTX-M13 ϕ, the heads of GBM22 mice were subjected to in vivo SWIR imaging (Figures 1A,B, right panel, In vivo SWIR images, respectively). Results demonstrated IR1050-CTX-M13 ϕ or SWCNT-CTX-M13 ϕ signal localized to the right posterior frontal lobe region corresponding to the site of GBM22 tumor induction (Figures 1A,B, right panel, In vivo SWIR images, black dotted circles). Background uptake of IR1050-CTX-M13 or SWCNT-CTX-M13 phage was observed in the occipital bony protruberance of the mice (Figures 1A,B, right panel, In vivo SWIR images, green dotted circles, respectively). To further confirm the uptake of CTX-M13 ϕ at the site of GBM22 brain tumors, we removed the brains from the skulls of GBM22 mice and performed ex vivo SWIR imaging. Ex vivo SWIR imaging demonstrated focused IR1050-CTX-M13 or SWCNT-CTX-M13 signal at the site of GBM22 tumors (Figures 1A,B, right panel, Ex vivo SWIR images, black dotted circles, respectively). The elimination of signal from the bony region corresponding to the occipital bone during ex vivo SWIR imaging confirmed the nonspecific uptake of IR1050-CTX-M13 ϕ and SWCNT-CTX-M13 ϕ by the occipital bone (Figures 1A,B, right panel, Ex vivo SWIR images, green dotted circles) and the specificity of the CTX-M13 ϕ to detect GBM22 cells in the brain (Figures 1A,B, right panel, Ex vivo SWIR images, black dotted circles). Taken together, our preliminary data confirms the modular nature of M13 ϕ to be functionalized and conjugated for use in glioma tumor detection using SWIR imaging with the potential for further development as a theranostic nanomaterial for the treatment of gliomas.

Discussion

Filamentous bacteriophage are highly stable and scalable nanoscale materials that have been characterized for their inert effects as a nano-carrier for the delivery of a range of vaccine-based therapies in humans (González-Mora et al., 2020; Margot et al., 2020; Chung et al., 2021). Like other filamentous bacteriophage systems, M13 ϕ is genetically tunable and can be manufactured at relative low costs with high uniformity across batches, making this nanoplatform an ideal candidate as a theranostic delivery system. Recent studies have demonstrated the ability of filamentous phage to achieve penetration into the CNS space through intranasal delivery or assisted by temporary disruption of the BBB through convection-enhanced delivery for the treatment of neurological diseases (Carrera et al., 2004; Wan et al., 2009; Dabrowska, 2019).

A recent study using a hybrid vector expressing an adeno-associated virus and a single-stranded M13 phage (AAVP) displaying a double-cyclic RGD4C motif ligand (which targets alpha V integrin receptors expressed on the surface of tumor vascular endothelium) with the gene sequence for the cytotoxic protein tumor necrosis factor (RGD4C-AAVP-TNF), demonstrated tumor killing when systemically delivered over 3 consecutive doses in an intracranial orthotopic xenograft mouse model of U87MG human glioma (Staquicini et al., 2020). The same study also leveraged the RGD4C-AAVP construct to express Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (RGD4C-AAVP-HSVtk) in U87MG mice followed by treatment with gangciclovir as suicide gene therapy. Both the RGD4C-AAVP-TNF and RGDC4C-AAVP-HSVtk constructs achieved the intended cytotoxic and theranostic effects, respectively, demonstrating the potential for using M13 ϕ as a theranostic for the treatment of human gliomas and potentially other brain tumors (Staquicini et al., 2020). Our preliminary data demonstrating the ability of IR1050-CTX-M13 ϕ and SWCNT-CTX-M13 ϕ to detect patient-derived GBM22 tumors in the brains of mice using SWIR imaging (Figures 1A,B, right panel, Ex vivo SWIR images), and our previously published studies using NIR II conjugated-M13 ϕ expressing tumor-targeting peptides to detect ovarian cancer tumors during real-time surgical resection in a mouse model of ovarian cancer (Yi et al., 2012; Ghosh et al., 2014), further enforces the potential of using M13 ϕ as a versatile theranostic platform for use in FGS and multimodal treatment of a wide range of tumors, including brain tumors. We are currently conducting further preclinical studies to better characterize the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of M13 ϕ in the CNS to assess the translational potential for use in human trials (Tsedev et al., 2022).

The potential for tumor-targeting nanoscale materials to be used in the detection and treatment of a wide range of brain tumors can offer patients a personalized treatment path. In particular, the recent 2021 reclassification of CNS tumors into further molecular subtypes based on genetic modifiers and/or diagnostic molecular pathological features (Louis et al., 2021), has uncovered limitations in using 5-ALA FGS for Gr III glial tumors (Mirza et al., 2022). This study compared outcomes in 69 patients with Gr III gliomas—39 patients had 5-ALA FGS and 30 patients had non-5-ALA FGS. Patients in the 5-ALA group had preoperative MR imaging that demonstrated some degree of contrast enhancement compared to those in the non-5-ALA group. The degree of intraoperative 5-ALA fluorescence directly correlated to the presence of contrast enhancement on preoperative imaging. Interestingly, the degree of intraoperative fluorescence was not associated with either 1p19q codeletion nor IDH mutational tumor status, however, significantly more patients with gliomas that had O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation received 5-ALA FGS. There were no statistically significant differences in OS nor EoR between groups, but interestingly performance status was worse in the 5-ALA group in the immediate post-operative and 6-month follow-up periods. Patients in the 5-ALA group who had a GTR had significant improvements in OS compared to patients with subtotal resections (STR), however patients who had STRs in the non-5-ALA group had better performance scores at 6 months compared to patients with STRs in the 5-ALA group. This and other studies point towards a potential correlation between molecular subtyping with 5-ALA tumor fluorescence, and argues against the widespread use of 5-ALA FGS in these patients. Similarly, an elegant study by Obaid and colleagues using an NIR-II EGFR-targeting nanoliposome formulation to study the specificity of NP delivery to EGFR-expressing glioma cell lines in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo, demonstrated that delivery of nanoliposomes to the tumor site did not correlate with EGFR expression in the three different glioma cell lines that were tested, underrepresenting the image-derived molecular specificity by up to 94.2% (Obaid et al., 2021). This suggests that the accumulation of functionalized nanoliposomes (which are the most commonly used types of NPs for clinical applications) at the sites of tumors may be more dependent on the enhanced permeability and retention properties of tumors rather than their specificity of molecular targeting—something that researchers should be aware of when using receptor-ligand biochemistry to improve a nanoparticle’s delivery to the tissue site of interest to assist in FSG. Finally, the ability to tailor theranostics for patients who have subtypes of gliomas that do not respond well to FGS may offer an alternative personalized approach to treating this increasingly heterogeneous group of tumors.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the increasing use of fluorescence image-guided tumor resection within the neurosurgical community opens an avenue for the introduction of innovative theranostic nanoplatforms that could further assist the tumor surgeon in achieving intraoperative detection and maximal EoR. Whilst future comparative studies are needed to definitively assess the ability of FGS to achieve better patient outcomes compared to the less costly, non-fluorescence-based navigated resection techniques, the potential for theranostics to be applied in a more personalized fashion may lead to breakthroughs in treating complex and heterogeneous brain tumors such as gliomas in order to achieve better survival outcomes afforded by current standard of care treatment regimens, which have largely remained unchanged over the past several decades.

Author Contributions

FL and UT designed experiments, obtained SWIR in vivo imaging data, and wrote the manuscript. AB supervised the experiments and edited the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Abbott N. J., Patabendige A. A. K., Dolman D. E. M., Yusof S. R., Begley D. J. (2010). Structure and Function of the Blood-Brain Barrier. Neurobiol. Dis. 37 (1), 13–25. 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acerbi F., Broggi M., Eoli M., Anghileri E., Cuppini L., Pollo B., et al. (2013). Fluorescein-guided Surgery for Grade IV Gliomas with a Dedicated Filter on the Surgical Microscope: Preliminary Results in 12 Cases. Acta Neurochir. 155 (7), 1277–1286. 10.1007/s00701-013-1734-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Acerbi F., Cavallo C., Broggi M., Cordella R., Anghileri E., Eoli M., et al. (2014). Fluorescein-guided Surgery for Malignant Gliomas: A Review. Neurosurg. Rev. 37 (4), 547–557. 10.1007/s10143-014-0546-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander A. L., Lee J. E., Lazar M., Field A. S. (2007). Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain. Neurotherapeutics 4 (3), 316–329. 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Algethami H., Lam F. C., Rojas R., Kasper E. (2021). “Presurgical and Surgical Planning in Neurosurgical Oncology - A Case-Based Approach to Maximal Safe Surgical Resection in Neurosurgery,” in IntechOpen. 10.5772/intechopen.99155 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Alphandéry E., Grand-Dewyse P., Lefèvre R., Mandawala C., Durand-Dubief M. (2015). Cancer Therapy Using Nanoformulated Substances: Scientific, Regulatory and Financial Aspects. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 15 (10), 1233–1255. 10.1586/14737140.2015.1086647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barar J., Rafi M. A., Pourseif M. M., Omidi Y. (2016). Blood-brain Barrier Transport Machineries and Targeted Therapy of Brain Diseases. Bioimpacts 6 (4), 225–248. 10.15171/bi.2016.30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Belloch J. P., Rovira V., Llácer J. L., Riesgo P. A., Cremades A. (2014). Fluorescence-guided Surgery in High Grade Gliomas Using an Exoscope System. Acta Neurochir. 156 (4), 653–660. 10.1007/s00701-013-1976-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bohinski R. J., Kokkino A. K., Warnick R. E., Gaskill-Shipley M. F., Kormos D. W., Lukin R. R., et al. (2001). Glioma Resection in a Shared-Resource Magnetic Resonance Operating Room after Optimal Image-Guided Frameless Stereotactic Resection. Neurosurgery 48 (4), 731–744. discussion 742-4. 10.1227/00006123-200104000-00007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Butte P. V., Mamelak A., Parrish-Novak J., Drazin D., Shweikeh F., Gangalum P. R., et al. (2014). Near-infrared Imaging of Brain Tumors Using the Tumor Paint BLZ-100 to Achieve Near-Complete Resection of Brain Tumors. Foc 36 (2), E1. 10.3171/2013.11.focus13497 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carr J. A., Franke D., Caram J. R., Perkinson C. F., Saif M., Askoxylakis V., et al. (2018). Shortwave Infrared Fluorescence Imaging with the Clinically Approved Near-Infrared Dye Indocyanine Green. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 (17), 4465–4470. 10.1073/pnas.1718917115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Carrera M. R. A., Kaufmann G. F., Mee J. M., Meijler M. M., Koob G. F., Janda K. D. (2004). Treating Cocaine Addiction with Viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101 (28), 10416–10421. 10.1073/pnas.0403795101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cavallo C., De Laurentis C., Vetrano I. G., Falco J., Broggi M., Schiariti M., et al. (2018). The Utilization of Fluorescein in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review. J. Neurosurg. Sci. 62 (6), 690–703. 10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04480-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ceppi L., Bardhan N. M., Na Y., Siegel A., Rajan N., Fruscio R., et al. (2019). Real-Time Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Based Fluorescence Imaging Improves Survival after Debulking Surgery in an Ovarian Cancer Model. ACS Nano 13 (5), 5356–5365. 10.1021/acsnano.8b09829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chicoine M. R., Lim C. C. H., Evans J. A., Singla A., Zipfel G. J., Rich K. M., et al. (2011). Implementation and Preliminary Clinical Experience with the Use of Ceiling Mounted Mobile High Field Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging between Two Operating Rooms. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 109, 97–102. 10.1007/978-3-211-99651-5_15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cho S. S., Jeon J., Buch L., Nag S., Nasrallah M., Low P. S., et al. (2018). Intraoperative Near-Infrared Imaging with Receptor-specific versus Passive Delivery of Fluorescent Agents in Pituitary Adenomas. J. Neurosurg. 131 (6), 1974–1984. 10.3171/2018.7.JNS181642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cho S. S., Zeh R., Pierce J. T., Jeon J., Nasrallah M., Adappa N. D., et al. (2019). Folate Receptor Near-Infrared Optical Imaging Provides Sensitive and Specific Intraoperative Visualization of Nonfunctional Pituitary Adenomas. Onsurg 16 (1), 59–70. 10.1093/ons/opy034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chung J., Jung Y., Hong C., Kim S., Moon S., Kwak E. A., et al. (2021). Filamentous Anti-influenza Agents Wrapping Around Viruses. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 583, 267–278. 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cohen-Inbar O., Zaaroor M. (2016). Glioblastoma Multiforme Targeted Therapy: The Chlorotoxin Story. J. Clin. Neurosci. 33, 52–58. 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.04.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. d'Angelo M., Castelli V., Benedetti E., Antonosante A., Catanesi M., Dominguez-Benot R., et al. (2019). Theranostic Nanomedicine for Malignant Gliomas. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 325. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dabrowska K. (2019). Phage Therapy: What Factors Shape Phage Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability? Systematic and Critical Review. Med. Res. Rev. 39 (5), 2000–2025. 10.1002/med.21572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dandy W. E. (1919). Fluoroscopy of the Cerebral Ventricles. Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. 30, 29–33. 10.1097/00007611-191908000-00051 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dandy W. E. (1933). Physiological Studies Following Extirpation of Right Cerebral Hemisphere in Man. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 33, 31–51. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dandy W. E. (1918). Ventriculography Following the Injection of Air into the Cerebral Ventricles. Ann. Surg. 68, 5–11. 10.1097/00000658-191807000-00002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dardevet L., Rani D., Aziz T., Bazin I., Sabatier J.-M., Fadl M., et al. (2015). Chlorotoxin: A Helpful Natural Scorpion Peptide to Diagnose Glioma and Fight Tumor Invasion. Toxins 7 (4), 1079–1101. 10.3390/toxins7041079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Del Maestro R. F. (2006). A History of Neuro-Oncology. Montreal: DW Medical Consulting Inc. [Google Scholar]
  27. Della Puppa A., Ciccarino P., Lombardi G., Rolma G., Cecchin D., Rossetto M. (2014). 5-Aminolevulinic Acid Fluorescence in High Grade Glioma Surgery: Surgical Outcome, Intraoperative Findings, and Fluorescence Patterns. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 232561. 10.1155/2014/232561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Della Puppa A., Gioffrè G., Gardiman M. P., Frasson C., Cecchin D., Scienza R., et al. (2014). Intra-operative 5-aminolevulinic Acid (ALA)-induced Fluorescence of Medulloblastoma: Phenotypic Variability and CD133+ Expression According to Different Fluorescence Patterns. Neurol. Sci. 35 (1), 99–102. 10.1007/s10072-013-1597-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Della Puppa A., Rustemi O., Gioffrè G., Scienza R. (2015). Approaching a Brainstem High-Grade Glioma (HGG) with the Assistance of 5-aminolevulinic Acid (5-ALA) Technology: A New Strategy for an Old Surgical Challenge. Neurol. Sci. 36 (5), 797–799. 10.1007/s10072-014-1901-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dixit S., Novak T., Miller K., Zhu Y., Kenney M. E., Broome A.-M. (2015). Transferrin Receptor-Targeted Theranostic Gold Nanoparticles for Photosensitizer Delivery in Brain Tumors. Nanoscale 7 (5), 1782–1790. 10.1039/c4nr04853a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Du D., Chang N., Sun S., Li M., Yu H., Liu M., et al. (2014). The Role of Glucose Transporters in the Distribution of P-Aminophenyl-α-D-Mannopyranoside Modified Liposomes within Mice Brain. J. Control. Release 182, 99–110. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fan Z., Fu P. P., Yu H., Ray P. C. (2014). Theranostic Nanomedicine for Cancer Detection and Treatment. J. Food Drug Analysis 22 (1), 3–17. 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fountain D. M., Bryant A., Barone D. G., Waqar M., Hart M. G., Bulbeck H., et al. (2021). Intraoperative Imaging Technology to Maximise Extent of Resection for Glioma: A Network Meta-Analysis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1, CD013630. 10.1002/14651858.CD013630.pub2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gao H., Zhang S., Cao S., Yang Z., Pang Z., Jiang X. (2014). Angiopep-2 and Activatable Cell-Penetrating Peptide Dual-Functionalized Nanoparticles for Systemic Glioma-Targeting Delivery. Mol. Pharm. 11 (8), 2755–2763. 10.1021/mp500113p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Geier E. G., Schlessinger A., Fan H., Gable J. E., Irwin J. J., Sali A., et al. (2013). Structure-based Ligand Discovery for the Large-Neutral Amino Acid Transporter 1, LAT-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (14), 5480–5485. 10.1073/pnas.1218165110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ghosh D., Bagley A. F., Na Y. J., Birrer M. J., Bhatia S. N., Belcher A. M. (2014). Deep, Noninvasive Imaging and Surgical Guidance of Submillimeter Tumors Using Targeted M13-Stabilized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111 (38), 13948–13953. 10.1073/pnas.1400821111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ghosh D., Kohli A. G., Moser F., Endy D., Belcher A. M. (2012). Refactored M13 Bacteriophage as a Platform for Tumor Cell Imaging and Drug Delivery. ACS Synth. Biol. 1 (12), 576–582. 10.1021/sb300052u [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Golub D., Hyde J., Dogra S., Nicholson J., Kirkwood K. A., Gohel P., et al. (2020). Intraoperative MRI versus 5-ALA in High-Grade Glioma Resection: a Network Meta-Analysis. J. Neurosurg., 1–15. 10.3171/2019.12.JNS191203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Golubewa L., Timoshchenko I., Romanov O., Karpicz R., Kulahava T., Rutkauskas D., et al. (2020). Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes as a Photo-Thermo-Acoustic Cancer Theranostic Agent: Theory and Proof of the Concept Experiment. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 22174. 10.1038/s41598-020-79238-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. González-Mora A., Hernández-Pérez J., Iqbal H. M. N., Rito-Palomares M., Benavides J. (2020). Bacteriophage-Based Vaccines: A Potent Approach for Antigen Delivery. Vaccines (Basel) 8 (3). 10.3390/vaccines8030504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hawkins R. A., O'Kane R. L., Simpson I. A., Viña J. R. (2006). Structure of the Blood-Brain Barrier and its Role in the Transport of Amino Acids. J. Nutr. 136 (1 Suppl. l), 218S–26S. 10.1093/jn/136.1.218S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Heuer G. J., Dandy W. E. (1916). Roentgenography in the Localization of Brain Tumor, Based upon a Series of One Hundred Consecutive Cases. Johns Hopkins Bull. 27, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ho I. A. W., Hui K. M., Lam P. Y. P. (2010). Isolation of Peptide Ligands that Interact Specifically with Human Glioma Cells. Peptides 31 (4), 644–650. 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.12.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jiang T., Zhang Z., Zhang Y., Lv H., Zhou J., Li C., et al. (2012). Dual-functional Liposomes Based on pH-Responsive Cell-Penetrating Peptide and Hyaluronic Acid for Tumor-Targeted Anticancer Drug Delivery. Biomaterials 33 (36), 9246–9258. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jiang Y., Yang W., Zhang J., Meng F., Zhong Z. (2018). Protein Toxin Chaperoned by LRP-1-Targeted Virus-Mimicking Vesicles Induces High-Efficiency Glioblastoma Therapy In Vivo . Adv. Mater 30 (30), e1800316. 10.1002/adma.201800316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Jing H., Weidensteiner C., Reichardt W., Gaedicke S., Zhu X., Grosu A.-L., et al. (2016). Imaging and Selective Elimination of Glioblastoma Stem Cells with Theranostic Near-Infrared-Labeled CD133-specific Antibodies. Theranostics 6 (6), 862–874. 10.7150/thno.12890 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Joshi S., Cooke J. R. N., Ellis J. A., Emala C. W., Bruce J. N. (2017). Targeting Brain Tumors by Intra-arterial Delivery of Cell-Penetrating Peptides: A Novel Approach for Primary and Metastatic Brain Malignancy. J. Neurooncol 135 (3), 497–506. 10.1007/s11060-017-2615-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ke W., Zha Z., Mukerabigwi J. F., Chen W., Wang Y., He C., et al. (2017). Matrix Metalloproteinase-Responsive Multifunctional Peptide-Linked Amphiphilic Block Copolymers for Intelligent Systemic Anticancer Drug Delivery. Bioconjugate Chem. 28 (8), 2190–2198. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Knauth M., Wirtz C. R., Tronnier V. M., Aras N., Kunze S., Sartor K. (1999). Intraoperative MR Imaging Increases the Extent of Tumor Resection in Patients with High-Grade Gliomas. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 20 (9), 1642–1646. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kobayashi K., Ohnishi A., Promsuk J., Shimizu S., Kanai Y., Shiokawa Y., et al. (2008). Enhanced Tumor Growth Elicited by L-type Amino Acid Transporter 1 in Human Malignant Glioma Cells. Neurosurgery 62 (2), 493–504. discussion 503-4. 10.1227/01.neu.0000316018.51292.19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kuroiwa T., Kajimoto Y., Ohta T. (1999). Comparison between Operative Findings on Malignant Glioma by a Fluorescein Surgical Microscopy and Histological Findings. Neurological Res. 21 (1), 130–134. 10.1080/01616412.1999.11740909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Kuroiwa T., Kajimoto Y., Ohta T. (1998). Development of a Fluorescein Operative Microscope for Use during Malignant Glioma Surgery. Surg. Neurol. 50 (1), 41–49. discussion 48-9. 10.1016/s0090-3019(98)00055-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Kwan A. S., Barry C., McAllister I. L., Constable I. (2006). Fluorescein Angiography and Adverse Drug Reactions Revisited: the Lions Eye Experience. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 34 (1), 33–38. 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01136.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Kwiterovich K. A., Maguire M. G., Murphy R. P., Schachat A. P., Bressler N. M., Bressler S. B., et al. (1991). Frequency of Adverse Systemic Reactions after Fluorescein Angiography. Ophthalmology 98 (7), 1139–1142. 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32165-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Kwong K. K., Belliveau J. W., Chesler D. A., Goldberg I. E., Weisskoff R. M., Poncelet B. P., et al. (1992). Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Brain Activity during Primary Sensory Stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89 (12), 5675–5679. 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Lacroix M., Abi-Said D., Fourney D. R., Gokaslan Z. L., Shi W., DeMonte F., et al. (2001). A Multivariate Analysis of 416 Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme: Prognosis, Extent of Resection, and Survival. J. Neurosurg. 95 (2), 190–198. 10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lam F. C., Morton S. W., Wyckoff J., Vu Han T.-L., Hwang M. K., Maffa A., et al. (2018). Enhanced Efficacy of Combined Temozolomide and Bromodomain Inhibitor Therapy for Gliomas Using Targeted Nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 1991. 10.1038/s41467-018-04315-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lee J. Y. K., Thawani J. P., Pierce J., Zeh R., Martinez-Lage M., Chanin M., et al. (2016). Intraoperative Near-Infrared Optical Imaging Can Localize Gadolinium-Enhancing Gliomas during Surgery. Neurosurgery 79 (6), 856–871. 10.1227/neu.0000000000001450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Li J., Zhang Q., Pang Z., Wang Y., Liu Q., Guo L., et al. (2012). Identification of Peptide Sequences that Target to the Brain Using In Vivo Phage Display. Amino Acids 42 (6), 2373–2381. 10.1007/s00726-011-0979-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Lin C.-W., Bachilo S. M., Zheng Y., Tsedev U., Huang S., Weisman R. B., et al. (2019). Creating Fluorescent Quantum Defects in Carbon Nanotubes Using Hypochlorite and Light. Nat. Commun. 10 (1), 2874. 10.1038/s41467-019-10917-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Liu C., Zhao Z., Gao H., Rostami I., You Q., Jia X., et al. (2019). Enhanced Blood-Brain-Barrier Penetrability and Tumor-Targeting Efficiency by Peptide-Functionalized Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimer for the Therapy of Gliomas. Nanotheranostics 3 (4), 311–330. 10.7150/ntno.38954 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Liu Y., Mei L., Yu Q., Zhang Q., Gao H., Zhang Z., et al. (2015). Integrin αvβ3 Targeting Activity Study of Different Retro-Inverso Sequences of RGD and Their Potentiality in the Designing of Tumor Targeting Peptides. Amino Acids 47 (12), 2533–2539. 10.1007/s00726-015-2043-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Louis D. N., Perry A., Wesseling P., Brat D. J., Cree I. A., Figarella-Branger D., et al. (2021). The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A Summary. Neuro Oncol. 23 (8), 1231–1251. 10.1093/neuonc/noab106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Margot S., Saulnier A., Barban V. (2020). Phages and Vaccination: towards New Opportunities? Virol. (Montrouge) 24 (1), 37–47. 10.1684/vir.2019.0794 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Mendes M., Sousa J. J., Pais A., Vitorino C. (2018). Targeted Theranostic Nanoparticles for Brain Tumor Treatment. Pharmaceutics 10 (4). 10.3390/pharmaceutics10040181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Miller S. E., Tummers W. S., Teraphongphom N., van den Berg N. S., Hasan A., Ertsey R. D., et al. (2018). First-in-human Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Glioblastoma Using Cetuximab-IRDye800. J. Neurooncol 139 (1), 135–143. 10.1007/s11060-018-2854-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Mirza A. B., Jose Pedro L., Ioannis C., Timothy Martyn B., Amisha V., Qusai A. B., et al. (2022). 5-Aminolevulinic Acid-Guided Resection in Grade III Tumors - A Comparative Cohort Study. Oper. Neurosurg. Hagerst. 22, 215–223. 10.1227/ons.0000000000000118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Mislow J. M. K., Golby A. J., Black P. M. (2009). Origins of Intraoperative MRI. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 20 (2), 137–146. 10.1016/j.nec.2009.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Moniz E. (1927). L'Encephalographie arterielle son importance dans la localization des tumeurs cerebrales. Rev. Neurol. 2, 72–89. [Google Scholar]
  70. Naik A., Smith E. J., Barreau A., Nyaeme M., Cramer S. W., Najafali D., et al. (2022). Comparison of Fluorescein Sodium, 5-ALA, and Intraoperative MRI for Resection of High-Grade Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 98, 240–247. 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.02.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nawashiro H., Otani N., Uozumi Y., Ooigawa H., Toyooka T., Suzuki T., et al. (2005). High Expression of L-type Amino Acid Transporter 1 in Infiltrating Glioma Cells. Brain Tumor Pathol. 22 (2), 89–91. 10.1007/s10014-005-0188-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. O'Donnell L. J., Westin C. F. (2011). An Introduction to Diffusion Tensor Image Analysis. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 22, 185. 10.1016/j.nec.2010.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Obaid G., Samkoe K., Tichauer K., Bano S., Park Y., Silber Z., et al. (2021). Is Tumor Cell Specificity Distinct from Tumor Selectivity In Vivo? A Quantitative NIR Molecular Imaging Analysis of Nanoliposome Targeting. Nano Res. 14 (5), 1344–1354. 10.1007/s12274-020-3178-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Ogawa S., Lee T. M., Kay A. R., Tank D. W. (1990). Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Contrast Dependent on Blood Oxygenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87 (24), 9868–9872. 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Onda N., Kimura M., Yoshida T., Shibutani M. (2016). Preferential Tumor Cellular Uptake and Retention of Indocyanine Green Forin Vivotumor Imaging. Int. J. Cancer 139 (3), 673–682. 10.1002/ijc.30102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Onoshima D., Yukawa H., Baba Y. (2015). Multifunctional Quantum Dots-Based Cancer Diagnostics and Stem Cell Therapeutics for Regenerative Medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 95, 2–14. 10.1016/j.addr.2015.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Oppenlander M. E., Wolf A. B., Snyder L. A., Bina R., Wilson J. R., Coons S. W., et al. (2014). An Extent of Resection Threshold for Recurrent Glioblastoma and its Risk for Neurological Morbidity. Jns 120 (4), 846–853. 10.3171/2013.12.jns13184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Pérez-Escuredo J., Van Hée V. F., Sboarina M., Falces J., Payen V. L., Pellerin L., et al. (2016). Monocarboxylate Transporters in the Brain and in Cancer. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Res. 1863 (10), 2481–2497. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Qin Y., Chen H., Yuan W., Kuai R., Zhang Q., Xie F., et al. (2011). Liposome Formulated with TAT-Modified Cholesterol for Enhancing the Brain Delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 419 (1-2), 85–95. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Roelz R., Strohmaier D., Jabbarli R., Kraeutle R., Egger K., Coenen V. A., et al. (2016). Residual Tumor Volume as Best Outcome Predictor in Low Grade Glioma - A Nine-Years Near-Randomized Survey of Surgery vs. Biopsy. Sci. Rep. 6, 32286. 10.1038/srep32286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Rogers C. M., Jones P. S., Weinberg J. S. (2021). Intraoperative MRI for Brain Tumors. J. Neurooncol 151 (3), 479–490. 10.1007/s11060-020-03667-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Sanai N., Polley M.-Y., McDermott M. W., Parsa A. T., Berger M. S. (2011). An Extent of Resection Threshold for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastomas. Jns 115 (1), 3–8. 10.3171/2011.2.jns10998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Scherer M., Ahmeti H., Roder C., Gessler F., Jungk C., Pala A., et al. (2020). Surgery for Diffuse WHO Grade II Gliomas: Volumetric Analysis of a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort from the German Study Group for Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Neurosurg. 86 (1), E64–E74. 10.1093/neuros/nyz397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Senft C., Bink A., Franz K., Vatter H., Gasser T., Seifert V. (2011). Intraoperative MRI Guidance and Extent of Resection in Glioma Surgery: a Randomised, Controlled Trial. Lancet Oncol. 12 (11), 997–1003. 10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70196-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Sharma G., Modgil A., Layek B., Arora K., Sun C., Law B., et al. (2013). Cell Penetrating Peptide Tethered Bi-ligand Liposomes for Delivery to Brain In Vivo: Biodistribution and Transfection. J. Control. Release 167 (1), 1–10. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Sharma S., Mann A. P., Mölder T., Kotamraju V. R., Mattrey R., Teesalu T., et al. (2017). Vascular Changes in Tumors Resistant to a Vascular Disrupting Nanoparticle Treatment. J. Control. Release 268, 49–56. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.10.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Shi K., Long Y., Xu C., Wang Y., Qiu Y., Yu Q., et al. (2015). Liposomes Combined an Integrin αvβ3-Specific Vector with pH-Responsible Cell-Penetrating Property for Highly Effective Antiglioma Therapy through the Blood-Brain Barrier. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 7 (38), 21442–21454. 10.1021/acsami.5b06429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Smith Q. R. (2000). Transport of Glutamate and Other Amino Acids at the Blood-Brain Barrier. J. Nutr. 130 (4S Suppl. l), 1016S–22S. 10.1093/jn/130.4.1016S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Staquicini F. I., Smith T. L., Tang F. H. F., Gelovani J. G., Giordano R. J., Libutti S. K., et al. (2020). Targeted AAVP-Based Therapy in a Mouse Model of Human Glioblastoma: A Comparison of Cytotoxic versus Suicide Gene Delivery Strategies. Cancer Gene Ther. 27 (5), 301–310. 10.1038/s41417-019-0101-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Stummer W., Pichlmeier U., Meinel T., Wiestler O. D., Zanella F., Reulen H.-J. (2006). Fluorescence-guided Surgery with 5-aminolevulinic Acid for Resection of Malignant Glioma: a Randomised Controlled Multicentre Phase III Trial. Lancet Oncol. 7 (5), 392–401. 10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70665-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Sunaert S. (2006). Presurgical Planning for Tumor Resectioning. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 23 (6), 887–905. 10.1002/jmri.20582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tonn J. C., Stummer W. (2008). Fluorescence-guided Resection of Malignant Gliomas Using 5-aminolevulinic Acid: Practical Use, Risks, and Pitfalls. Clin. Neurosurg. 55, 20–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Tsedev U., Lin C.-W., Hess G. T., Sarkaria J. N., Lam F. C., Belcher A. M. (2022). Phage Particles of Controlled Length and Genome for In Vivo Targeted Glioblastoma Imaging and Therapeutic Delivery. ACS Nano.. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Vahrmeijer A. L., Hutteman M., van der Vorst J. R., van de Velde C. J. H., Frangioni J. V. (2013). Image-guided Cancer Surgery Using Near-Infrared Fluorescence. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 10 (9), 507–518. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Veiseh O., Gunn J. W., Kievit F. M., Sun C., Fang C., Lee J. S., et al. (2009). Inhibition of Tumor-Cell Invasion with Chlorotoxin-Bound Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles. Small 5 (2), 256–264. 10.1002/smll.200800646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Wan X.-M., Chen Y.-P., Xu W.-R., Yang W.-j., Wen L.-P. (2009). Identification of Nose-To-Brain Homing Peptide through Phage Display. Peptides 30 (2), 343–350. 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.09.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Wang D., Starr R., Chang W. C., Aguilar B., Alizadeh D., Wright S. L., et al. (2020). Chlorotoxin-directed CAR T Cells for Specific and Effective Targeting of Glioblastoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 12 (533). 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw2672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Wang H., Liu X., Wang Y., Chen Y., Jin Q., Ji J. (2015). Doxorubicin Conjugated Phospholipid Prodrugs as Smart Nanomedicine Platforms for Cancer Therapy. J. Mat. Chem. B 3 (16), 3297–3305. 10.1039/c4tb01984a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Wang X., Wang C., Cheng L., Lee S.-T., Liu Z. (2012). Noble Metal Coated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Applications in Surface Enhanced Raman Scattering Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (17), 7414–7422. 10.1021/ja300140c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wang Y.-Y., Lui P. C., Li J. Y. (2009). Receptor-mediated Therapeutic Transport across the Blood-Brain Barrier. Immunotherapy 1 (6), 983–993. 10.2217/imt.09.75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wang Y., Sheng J., Chai J., Zhu C., Li X., Yang W., et al. (2021). Filamentous Bacteriophage-A Powerful Carrier for Glioma Therapy. Front. Immunol. 12, 729336. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.729336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wang Y., Shi K., Zhang L., Hu G., Wan J., Tang J., et al. (2016). Significantly Enhanced Tumor Cellular and Lysosomal Hydroxychloroquine Delivery by Smart Liposomes for Optimal Autophagy Inhibition and Improved Antitumor Efficiency with Liposomal Doxorubicin. Autophagy 12 (6), 949–962. 10.1080/15548627.2016.1162930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Yao J., Ma Y., Zhang W., Li L., Zhang Y., Zhang L., et al. (2017). Design of New Acid-Activated Cell-Penetrating Peptides for Tumor Drug Delivery. PeerJ 5, e3429. 10.7717/peerj.3429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Yi H., Ghosh D., Ham M.-H., Qi J., Barone P. W., Strano M. S., et al. (2012). M13 Phage-Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Nanoprobes for Second Near-Infrared Window Fluorescence Imaging of Targeted Tumors. Nano Lett. 12 (3), 1176–1183. 10.1021/nl2031663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhou X., Smith Q. R., Liu X. (2021). Brain Penetrating Peptides and Peptide-Drug Conjugates to Overcome the Blood-Brain Barrier and Target CNS Diseases. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 13 (4), e1695. 10.1002/wnan.1695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Zong T., Mei L., Gao H., Cai W., Zhu P., Shi K., et al. (2014). Synergistic Dual-Ligand Doxorubicin Liposomes Improve Targeting and Therapeutic Efficacy of Brain Glioma in Animals. Mol. Pharm. 11 (7), 2346–2357. 10.1021/mp500057n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES