Abstract
Avena sativa (A. sativa) oats have recently made a comeback as suitable alternative raw materials for dairy substitutes due to their functional properties. Amylolytic and cellulolytic enzyme-assisted modifications of oats produce new products that are more appealing to consumers. However, the biochemical and functional alteration of products and extracts requires careful selection of raw materials, enzyme cocktails, and technological aspects. This study compares the biochemical composition of different A. sativa enzyme-assisted water extracts and evaluates their microbial growth using spontaneous fermentation and the antimicrobial properties of the ferment extracts. Fibre content, total phenolic content, and antioxidant activity were evaluated using traditional methodologies. The degradation of A. sativa flour was captured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM); moreover, sugar and oligosaccharide alteration were identified using HPLC and HPLC-SEC after INFOGEST in vitro digestion (IVD). Additionally, taste differentiation was performed using an electronic tongue with principal component analysis. The oat liquid extracts were continuously fermented using two ancient fermentation starters, birch sap and Tibetan kefir grains. Both starters contain lactic acid bacteria (LAB), which has major potential for use in bio-preservation. In fermented extracts, antimicrobial properties against Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and group A streptococci as well as Gram-negative opportunistic bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were also determined. SEM images confirmed the successful incorporation of enzymes into the oat flour. The results indicate that using enzyme-assisted extraction significantly increased TPC and antioxidant activity in both the extract and residues. Additionally, carbohydrates with a molecular mass (MM) of over 70,000 kDa were reduced to 7000 kDa and lower after the incorporation of amylolytic and cellulolytic enzymes. The MM impacted the variation in microbial fermentation, which demonstrated favourable antimicrobial properties. The results demonstrated promising applications for developing functional products and components using bioprocessing as an innovative tool.
Keywords: enzymes-assisted extraction, sugars profile, HPLC-SEC, fermentation, antimicrobial properties, A. sativa, birch sap, Tibetan kefir grains, INFOGEST in vitro digestibility
1. Introduction
The presence of additives and higher sugar content in food products has increased the development of functional and clean food categories [1]. However, many challenges remain due to the demand for stable products and components, functionality, and overall quality. Oats (Avena sativa) are a well-known grain with a wide variety of applications. They are mainly known for its high content and variety of polysaccharides, such as beta-glucans and phenolic compounds, and are a typical breakfast for the nourishment of healthy and obese patients alike. Moreover, oats and their morphological parts are widely processed grains for nondairy substitutes, plant proteins, fermented food, and additives such as sweeteners (e.g., xylitol from oat hull) and thickeners [2,3]. Enzymes for grain material are commonly used to obtain fermentable sugars; specifically, controlled enzymatic hydrolyses release derivates. Polysaccharides cleaved into smaller monomers are attractive due to their novelty and sensory appealing properties [4]. Oat-based drinks (OBD) are gaining popularity and are usually produced via enzymatic hydrolysis due to the resulting reduction in viscosity and increase in sweetness [5,6]. Moreover, α-amylase treatment for oat flour resulted in more DPPH• and FRAP antioxidant activity than heating treatment. The number of phenolics such as avenanthramide 2c, 2p, and 2f, gallic and caffeic acids, and vanillin also increases significantly with this treatment [7].
Today, 69% of consumers believe that plant-based beverages are suitable for their kids, and 77% of millennials in the US drink plant-based drinks regularly [8]. For the most part, health requirements are covered by the consumption of dietary fibres and of less fat and sugar. However, the glycaemic index (GI) of plant-based beverages is medium or higher and varies between 47 and 99 [9]. According to Atkinson et al. [10], GI from 56 to 69 is considered medium; below 55 is low, and above 69 is high, and protein, fat, and fibre content all impact GI. During digestion, various salts impact the isomerization and charges of sugars, leading to altered gut balance and the mucosal absorption of intestinal epithelium [11].
Fermentable sugars produced via enzymatic hydrolysis targeting carbohydrates are economically suitable for many applications. These applications include fermentation using various bacterial strains. Fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols, known as FODMAPs, play an essential role in fermentation [12]. In some studies, enzymatically hydrolysed oat hull was fermented using Spathaspora hagerdaliae UFMG-CM-Y303, Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, and other yeasts to produce xylitol, a sugar alcohol, and ethanol [3,13,14]. Combined saccharification and simultaneous or spontaneous fermentation are also used to produce fermented food and beverages, especially in beer brewing [11,15]. On top of that, the benefit of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) fermentation for the gut microbiota is a highly contemporaneous subject that is commonly associated with the prevention of obesity and diabetes as well as with better cognitive function [12,16,17]. According to Bocchi et al. [17], oat beverages fermented with lactic acid bacteria strains increased α-tocopherol and d-tocopherol and reduced the number of lignans such as lariciresinol, meairesinol, and secoisolariciresinol [17]. Oat solid-state fermentation with Lactobacillus palntarum and Phizopus oryzae, according to Wu et al. [18], increased crude protein content by 23–29 mg/g as well as essential and nonessential amino acids, calcium, and potassium [18].
Fermented food has been consumed since 6000 BC, and fermentation is an effective way of preservation [19]. However, metabolites produced by fermenting strains such as organic acids, bacteriocins, and antimicrobial peptides may also have impacts on antimicrobial properties in the human context. This effect is emerging due to the development of rapid antibiotic resistance in the last decade [11,20]. Among the infectious bacteria commonly treated with antibiotics, two are the most abundant in the human population: Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and Gram-negative Escherichia Coli (E. Coli) [21]. The widely spread S. aureus can cause a broad spectrum of infections including skin and soft-tissue infections as well as foodborne illnesses, which are rapidly developing antibiotic resistance against which new prevention methods are required [22,23]. Similarly, antibiotic resistance for most available antibiotics has developed in E. Coli, a pathogen that is often responsible for sepsis and urinary tract infections. The O157:H7 strain of E. Coli is a high-risk foodborne pathogen with severe disease presentation [24,25].
Tibetan kefir grains (TKG) and birch sap are ancient known ingredients in the production of fermented products. TKG is a complex symbiosis of microbes and yeasts consisting of LAB, which is used for kefir production [26,27,28]. In contrast, birch sap is a semi-sweet nutritious drink collected from the birch tree [29] that if not thermally processed, ozonized, or iced in a few days following collection will start to naturally ferment [30,31]. Fresh birch sap is a nutritious medium for lactic acid bacteria growth and for the enrichment of sugars or co-substrates as suggested by Semjonovs et al. [32]. Both ingredients carry benefits and contribute to human health. However, there is still a lack of scientific knowledge about spontaneous symbiotic fermentation in plant-based beverages.
This study compared different enzymatic hydrolytic reactions in oat-based drink production by continuously fermenting these extracts using the spontaneous fermentation starters TKG and birch sap. Biochemical, physicochemical, and functional alterations were evaluated as described in the graphical overview in Figure 1. Moreover, OBDs were introduced to a variety of static in vitro digestion-simulating environments to better understand A. sativa FODMAPs. Additionally, for fermented drinks, microbial analyses were performed, and antimicrobial properties were evaluated.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals
The following substances and solvents were used in this study: ethanol 96% (v/v), (AB Strumbras, Kaunas, Lithuania), Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid, 99%), DPPH• (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl hydrate free radical), Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethyl-chroman-2-carboxylic acid), Na2CO3, potassium acetate, acetic acid, TPTZ (2,4,6-Tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine) (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (Vaseline-Fabrik Rhenania, Bonn, Germany), DMCA (4-(dimethylamino)-cinnamaldehyde), neutral detergent solution (ANKOM, Macedon, NY, USA), Sodium sulfite—Na2SO3, anhydrous (FSS, ANKOM Technology, City, Macedon, USA), and cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (FSS, ANKOM Technology, Macedon, NY, USA).
2.2. Plant Material (Dependent Sub-Sample)
The study was performed using an ecological cereal of oat flakes (A. sativa) harvested in Lithuania in 2021 (AUGA, Vilnius, Lithuania). Three 1 kg batches were prepared from stock by the supplier for the experiment. Prior to the extraction, plant materials were ground with an ultra-centrifugal mill, ZM 200 (Retsch, Haan, Germany), using a sieve with 0.5 mm holes.
2.3. Enzyme Products (Independent Sub-Sample)
GRAINZYME NL is a classical multienzyme product used as an adequate substitute for lowering viscosity in grain products. The cocktail’s main enzyme component is cellulase. The product is reported to have cellulase activity of 5000 U mL−1. However, it is also known to contain various additional active substances including hemicellulase, endo-xylanase, exo-xylanase, beta-glucanase, mannanase, galactosidase, and pectinase (Suntaq, Guangzhou, China).
SQzyme GL is a glucoamylase monocomponent [EC3.2.1.3] derived from the fermentation of wild Aspergillus niger (Suntaq, China). The product is reported to have a glucoamylase activity of 150,000 U mL−1.
SQzyme BAL is a food-grade bacterial α-amylase [EC3.2.1.1] derived from the fermentation of wild Bacillus subtilis (Suntaq, China). The product is reported to have a glucoamylase activity of 180,000 U mL−1.
2.4. Static In Vitro Digestion
The static in vitro digestion (IVD) of enzymatically hydrolysed hydrophilic extracts of A. sativa was carried out in three different stages as described by Minekus et al. [33]. Modifications to the procedure, as described by Streimikyte et al. in a study conducted in 2020, were incorporated. [34] Briefly, 5 mL of sample with 2 g of glass beads were mixed with simulated saliva fluids (SSF) and pre-incubates at 37 °C for a few minutes. Amylase was added, and the mixture was incubated for 2 min in a rotary mixer. After the samples were mixed with simulated gastric fluid (SGF) containing pepsin (2000 U mL−1 of digest), the pH was adjusted to 3 using 5 mol L−1 of HCl. The final digest volume was adjusted to 20 mL. The mixtures were placed into a temperature-controlled thermostat with a continuous rotator at 600 rad s−1. After two hours of incubation, the final intestinal step was carried out by adding simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) supplemented with the following individual enzymes: trypsin (100 U mL−1 of di-gest), chymotrypsin (25 U mL−1 of digest), pancreatic amylase (200 U mL−1 of digest), porcine pancreatic lipase (2000 U mL−1 of digest), and bile salts (10 mM of di-gest). The pH was adjusted to 7 by adding 5 mol L−1 of NaOH. The final volume of the sample was 40 mL. IVD was then performed for 180 min. The digestion process of the samples was stopped at gastric phase points by adjusting the pH to 7 and by cooling the samples; the digestion process for the intestinal phase samples was stopped only by cooling the samples to 0–4 °C in ice water. After cooling, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at +4 °C and filtered. The soluble fraction of the digest was collected, frozen, lyophilized, and stored at +6 °C prior to analysis. The digestion procedure was performed twice.
2.5. Enzyme-Assisted Extraction and Spontaneous Fermentation Using Tibetan Kefir Grains and Birch Sap
Enzyme-assisted extraction was performed with slight modifications as described by Streimikyte et al. [35]. Two different batches were analysed. Milled oat cereals (>0.5 mm) were homogenized with distilled water at a ratio of 1:5. Following that, 0.15% of AL and 0.15% NSP were added to the first batch, and 0.45% AL + AG, 0.15% NSP was added to the second batch. After 2.5 h of enzymatic extraction at 68 °C, liquid and solid fractions of the oats were collected. The enzymes were inactivated using heat treatment at 95 °C for 5 min. The liquid and solid parts were separated using a 100-micron sieve and then frozen and freeze-dried respectively until analysis. Following the enzyme-assisted extraction, but before the freezing, the liquid phase was used for further fermentation. Specifically, 10% of Tibetan Kefir grains were incorporated into the liquid samples. In parallel, the oat liquid fraction was homogenized with fresh birch sap at a ratio of 1:1. Fermentation was carried out in an incubator at a fixed temperature of 28 °C for five days. After five days, the samples were filtered and frozen at −20 °C until analysis.
2.6. Fibre Analysis
The analysis of Neutral Detergent Fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) was performed. An ANKOM2000 fibre analyser (ANKOM Technology, Macedony, NY, USA) was used to evaluate cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin content. Both methodologies are described in detail at https://www.ankom.com/analytical-methods-support/fibre-analyser-a200 (last visited 21 May 2022). ADF represents the remaining fibre content following digestion with H2SO4 and CTAB; it estimates the final content of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. For the analysis, A. sativa lyophilized samples were prepared. Furthermore, 0.45–0.50 g of A. sativa flour samples were sealed in filter bags. The samples were placed in a bag suspender and inserted into the fibre analyser for processing. The instrument then performed all the necessary steps for the digestion and rinsing of the samples. The samples were subsequently dried and weighed. The ADF content was calculated using the following formula:
(1) |
W1—bag tare weight; W2—sample weight; W3—dried weight of the bag containing fibre following the extraction process, C1—blank bag correction (running average of the final oven-dried weight divided by original blank bag weight).
The neutral detergent fibre method was used to evaluate the remaining residue after digestion in a detergent solution. The fibre residue predominantly comprised hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. The samples were prepared using the same steps as ADF. For the extraction, an additional 4 mL of alpha-amylase with an activity level of 17,400 Liquefon units mL−1 (FAA, ANKOM Technology) as well as 20 g of sodium sulfite were added. After the extraction, the filter bags containing the samples were washed with acetone and oven-dried. NDF content was calculated using the following formula:
(2) |
W1—bag tare weight; W2—sample weight; W3—dried weight of the bag containing fibre following the extraction process, C1—blank bag correction (running average of the final oven-dried weight divided by original blank bag weight).
2.7. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) Analysis
The morphological structure of the tested plant was examined using the images obtained with SEM FEI Quanta 200 FEG (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The samples were analysed in low vacuum mode operating at 3.0 kV using an LDF detector. A. sativa powder samples from the control and enzymatically hydrolysed residue groups were spread on an aluminium table and measured at three different locations.
2.8. Determination of Total Phenolic Content
Total phenolic content was determined with the Folin–Ciocalteu method with slight modifications as described by Viskelis et al. [36] using gallic acid as the standard [37]. The absorbance of the samples was measured at 765 nm using a Cintra 202 (GBC Scientific Equipment, Knox, Braeside, Australia) spectrophotometer. The total phenolic content was calculated from a gallic calibration curve and was expressed as mg per 100 g gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per gram of dry weight (mg GAE 100 g−1).
2.9. Determination of Antioxidant Capacity
DPPH• free radical scavenging activity was determined using the method proposed by Brand Williams, Cuvelie, and Berset [38] with slight modification [39]. Specifically, 2 mL of a DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) solution in 99.0% v/v ethanol was mixed with 20 μL of A. sativa extract samples. A decrease in absorbance was recorded at 515 nm with a Cintra 202 (GBC Scientific Equipment, Knox, Braeside, Australia) spectrophotometer after 30 min.
The ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was carried out as described by Benzie and Strain [40] with some modifications. The FRAP solution consisted of TPTZ (0.01 M dissolved in 0.04 M HCl), FeCl3 × 6H2O (0.02 M in water) and acetate buffer (0.3 M, pH 3.6) at the ratio of 1:1:10. Then, 2 mL of freshly prepared FRAP reagent was mixed with 2 μL of A. sativa extract samples. An increase in absorbance was recorded at 593 nm with a Cintra 202 (GBC Scientific Equipment, Knox, Australia) spectrophotometer after 30 min.
All antioxidant activity assays were calculated using Trolox calibration curves and expressed as μmol of the Trolox equivalent (TE) per one gram of dry weight (µmol TE g−1).
2.10. Sugar and Oligosacharide Molecular Mass Profiles
2.10.1. Sugar Identification Using High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
Sugar identification and quantification were performed using an HPLC Dionex Ultimate 3000-4 (International Equipment Trading Ltd., Mundelein, IL, USA) equipped with a column oven and an integrated Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After separating the analytes from the mixture on the analytical column, the individual compounds were then detected using UV and IR detectors (Wyatt, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). The following main parameters were applied: 5 M H2SO4 eluent, a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1, temperature of 60 °C, work pressure of 38–40 bar, and injection volume of 20 μL. The Sugar in the samples was hydrolysed using 60% H2SO4
2.10.2. High Pressure Liquid Chromatography Size Exclusion for Molecular Mass Distribution (HPLC-SEC)
A Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC (International Equipment Trading Ltd., Mundelein, IL, USA) equipped with a column oven with integrated size-exclusion Ohpak SB-802 HQ (8 × 300 mm (8 μm)) (Shodex, Munich, Germany) and Ultrahydrogel 500 (7.8 × 300 mm (10 μm)) (Waters, Wilmslow, UK) columns. Sugars were detected with the RI detector Optilab T-rEX (Wyatt, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). As a standard, in order to identify the degree of polymerisation (DP), the following monomeric units were used: DP1-D-(+)-glucose (≥99.5%; G8270; Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA); DP2-D-(+)-mannose (≥95%; 92683; Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA); DP3-maltotriose (>99%; GLU313; Elicityl S.A, Crolles, France) DP4-maltotetraose (>99%; GLU314; Elicityl S.A, Crolles, France). The following main parameters were applied: 0,05 M NaNO3 eluent, a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1, temperature of 40 °C, work pressure of 50–52 bar, RI detector, and an injection volume of 50 μL. A sample solution containing 2 to 20 mg g−1 (1% DMSO-dimethylsulphoxide as internal standard) of lyophilized matter was used for the test. The samples were stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 30 min. The required amount of sample (~1 mL) was filtered through a 0.45 μM syringe filter into a chromatographic flask (the filtrate had to be precise). Results were obtained by analysing the chromatograms. In this case, the retention times (tR) of each peak and internal standard (DMSO) were essential. These values and the chromatogram data were exported in the csv format and other required data (baseline and coordinates) were generated in a standard calculation file. The molecular weight distribution curve was plotted against sample concentration curves based on regularly checked and updated calibrations.
2.11. Electronic Tongue for A. sativa Extracts and Commercial Oat Drinks
A potentiometric electronic tongue (ET) produced by αAstree (Alpha M.O.S., Toulouse, France) was used. The device consisted of four parts, including a 48-tray liquid automatic sampler system, 7-liquid cross-selective taste sensors (ZZ, JE, BB, CA, GA, HA, and JB), an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and a PC computer with ASTREE Alpha M.O.S V12 software to perform statistical analyses. The sensor array is composed of 7 solid potential sensors that are a chemically modified field of effect transistors (ChemFET). These sensors are coated with a specific membrane (chemical compounds) to induce both cross-sensitivity and cross-selectivity. Product samples were measured with ET according to a procedure protocol obtained from Alpha MOS. The samples were centrifuged at 9000 × g for approximately 10 min. Nine measurements of each sample were performed for the data analysis, which was carried out using PCA to determine and characterize the correlations among the tastes of samples 2—batch I: A.sativa hydrophilic extract; 3—batch I: A.sativa hydrophilic extract diluted in water 80:20; 4—batch I: A.sativa hydrophilic extract diluted in water 70:30; 5—batch II: A.sativa hydrophilic extract; 6—Commercial OBD_1; 7—Commercial OBD_2; 8—Commercial OBD_3; 9—Commercial OBD_4; 10—Commercial OBD_5. The characteristics of the used commercial products that were produced using the different treatments are listed under “supplementary materials” in Figure S1. PCA (Figure 6). The PCA method is an unsupervised classification method that has been used successfully in many applications [41].
2.12. Microbial Evaluation of Fermented Samples
The microbial evaluation of the spontaneously fermented samples with TKG and birch sap was performed using agar diffusion to determine the growth of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, and Streptococcus thermophilus. Wells of 6 mm diameter were punched in the agar and filled with the fermented extracts. Agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the colonies were counted and expressed in cfu/mL. Viable mesophilic lactic bacterial counts were established by means of serial dilution and subsequent plating.
2.13. Antibacterial Activity Assay
Antibacterial activity in vitro was evaluated using agar diffusion against Gram-positive group A beta-hemolytic streptococci, Staphylococcus aureus, and Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli bacteria strains. For this purpose, sterile cotton was used. A suspension (~108 cfu/mL) of bacterial strains at 0.5 McFarland unit density was inoculated onto the cooled Mueller Hinton Agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) using swabs. Wells of 6 mm in diameter were punched in the agar and filled with 50 µL of extracts. The agar plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and zones of inhibition were measured and tabulated.
2.14. Statistical Analysis
All the results were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD), and all experiments were performed at least three times. In addition, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test were calculated to compare the means and demonstrated significant variation (p < 0.05). This was performed and calculated with the statistical package GraphPad Prism 8 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Hemicellulose, Cellulose, and Lignin Content
Fibre content was analysed before and after the enzymatic hydrolysis of A. sativa. Table 1 shows the hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin content after acid detergent fibre (ADF) analysis and neutral detergent fibre (NDF) analysis. The results indicated that hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin content in the hydrolysed fractions were 15.41–12.27% lower than in the control samples. This indicates that the non-starch polysaccharide enzymes (NSP) have hydrolysing properties. As the results show, 22.40% of A. sativa control samples consisted of hemicellulose. The A. sativa contents in batches I and II were 12.62% and 6.67%, respectively. This indicates that glucoamylase (GL), which was incorporated in batch II, cleaves the released polysaccharides and oligosaccharides into smaller monomers [15]. Additionally, because the A. sativa flour was stripped of the husk and bran and milled into fractions less than 0.5 mm in size, the enzymes were able to achieve higher activity. In comparison, for wheat straw, the release of hemicellulose reached 96 g/kg to 135 g/kg using enzyme cocktails with higher xylanolytic enzyme concentrations and 42.5–59.8% extraction [42].
Table 1.
Sample Name | Hemicellulose, Cellulose, and Lignin, % | Cellulose and Lignin, % |
---|---|---|
A. sativa control | 40.76 ± 1.97 a | 18.36 ± 0.51 b |
A. sativa batch I | 28.49 ± 0.85 c | 15.87 ± 1.83 b |
A. sativa batch II | 25.38 ± 2.45 c | 18.91 ± 3.45 b |
Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin content after acid detergent fibre (ADF) analysis, and cellulose and lignin content after neutral detergent fibre (NDF) analysis. Batch I: oat extract with an AL and NSP cocktails; Batch II: oat extract with an AL, GL and NSP cocktails. Values expressed as mean and standard deviation of triplicate determinations; different superscript letters within the same column indicate significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05).
3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
Images of enzymatically extracted spent grain were taken using SEM. As shown in Figure 2, the control sample of oat flour shows compact, well-shaped structures of milled flour. In comparison, in the enzyme-treated samples, there was an increase in spherical-shaped structures, which were clearly observed in samples (c) and (d). These findings correlate with those of Zhang et al. [43], who identified oat starch groups that seemed irregular and dispersed using SEM. The structures in Figure 2 demonstrate that enzymes can access and disrupt polymeric chains into smaller ones.
The main non-starch polysaccharide enzyme is cellulase (EC 3.2.1.4). However, the manufacturer (see “Materials and Methods”) states that potential activity of endo- and exo-cellulase, beta-glucanase, xylanase, and others may be present. This may result in synergistic activity with amylolytic enzymes such as amylase and glucoamylase, leading to rapid cleaving of the glycosidic linkages of the complex matrix of oat flour. The complex matrix can be seen in Figure 2a. For example, amorphous cellulose regions possess a higher affinity for cellulase because of the synergy with xylanases, as described in wheat straw enzymatic hydrolysis [42]. Moreover, NSP and starch-degrading enzyme mixture incorporation is common in brewing; NSP enzymes degrade the endosperm cell wall to increase the viability of starch, which is degradable by amylases and improves mashing [15]. In contrast, SEM pictures of the ultrasound-assisted extraction of oat bran at 45 Hz showed increased permeability but a consistent structure that was not seen in enzyme-assisted extraction [44].
3.3. Total Phenolic Content (TPC) and Antioxidant Activity through Enzymatic Extraction Kinetics
The enzymatic extraction kinetics were analysed for total phenolic content, DPPH•, and FRAP in in vitro antioxidant activity. The kinetics shown in Figure 3 represent similar asymptotic behaviour, reaching a plateau at around 150 min [42,45]. Enzyme assistance is widely applicable for enhancing total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, and peptide number [46,47,48,49]. A. sativa enzyme usage is recommended due to the residual starch particles, which may lower the extraction of phenols [44]. The samples in Figure 2 and Table 1 were extracted using α-amylase (AL), GL, and NSP cocktails.
TPC content increased 2.3 times from the beginning of the time enzyme-assisted hydrolysis, and FRAP antioxidant activity increased from 1.1 to 4.9 µM TE 100 mL−1. Following that, spent grain was collected after the enzyme-assisted extraction of oat flour, lyophilized, and re-extracted using different extraction solvents. The TPC content was measured, and the results are shown in Table 2. The results indicate that the highest extraction yield was achieved in enzymatically hydrolysed residues with acetone solvent 30:30 (v/w). In general, most samples reduced the content of phenols. However, it may explain the extractable content in the hydrophilic phase during enzyme-assisted extraction.
Table 2.
Extraction Solvent and Concentration, % (s/w) | Before EAE | After EAE |
---|---|---|
Oat Flour | Spent Grain | |
TPC mg GAE/100 g | ||
Ethanol | ||
30:70 | 66.3 ± 0.21 a | 14.5 ± 0.25 b |
50:50 | 80.5 ± 0.15 a | 43.6 ± 0.15 b |
70:30 | 70.7 ± 0.26 a | 43.7 ± 1.25 b |
Methanol | ||
30:30 | 60.6 ± 0.52 a | 25 ± 0.56 b |
50:50 | 61.9 ± 0.43 a | 62 ± 0.26 a |
70:30 | 66.5 ± 1.23 a | 51.3 ± 0.88 b |
Acetone | ||
30:30 | 77.6 ± 1.11 b | 91.7 ± 0.22 a |
50:50 | 83.5 ± 0.29 a | 71 ± 0.36 b |
70:30 | 82.4 ± 0.89 a | 61.7 ± 0.11 b |
Extraction solvent and water ratio (s/w); EAE—enzyme-assisted extraction; TPC—total phenolic content; GAE—gallic acid equivalent. Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation for triplicate determinations; different superscript letters within the same column indicate significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05).
Studies show that a temperature of 70 °C is preferable as it doubles the phenolic content from A. sativa. This is similar to our findings for enzymatic extraction. Moreover, UAE can be implemented to enhance the TPC content in oat bran. In a study conducted by Chen et al., [50] TPC composition using UAE increased 1.5-fold over conventional extraction methods. Although avenanthramides are involved in many metabolic pathways like COX2/PGE2 pathways and induce NK-κB inactivation in C2C12 cells, there are many other phenolic compounds that include gallic acid, anthranilic acid, and syringic acid and that have health-promoting properties. For example, syringic acid has anticancer properties in vivo and in vitro by potently inhibiting the proliferation of SW-480 colorectal cancer cells [51,52].
Oat pomace after extraction can be valuable material for further extractions of phenolic content with high antioxidative properties and inhibitory effects on OA-induced fatty liver model in vitro [53]. Polyphenol avenanthramides, explicitly found in oats, have been proven to protect from oxidative stress and regulate the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor (Nrf2) signalling pathway in P12 cells, which is a promising neuroprotective agent [54]. Re-extracted phytochemicals and disturbed long-chain polysaccharides were hydrolysed, resulting in a mixture of fermentable sugars and phytochemicals. These can also be incorporated into the medium as reducing or capping agents used in the green synthesis of nanoparticles [55,56]. Oat residues, after extraction, can also be referred to as brewer’s spent grain (BSG) due to the similar saccharification processes applied in OBD production. BSG is the main solid waste after principal extraction. Recent studies suggest that spent grain use is appropriate for enzyme-cocktail production using solid-state fermentation, reducing expenses for the substrate by producing enzymes that lower the cost by up to 30% [57,58].
3.4. Sugar Profile and Variation after Static In Vitro Digestion
3.4.1. Sugar Identification Using High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
The quantitative profiles of the monomeric sugars and organic acids are represented in Figure 4. Glucose is the main simple sugar in these samples, making up to 94.5 ± 0.9%, while the composition of other sugars varied between 0.2% and 2.0% in enzyme-assisted extracts. Similar tendencies were observed in samples after simulated in vitro digestion, where glucose monomeric units dominated at 92.5 ± 1.45% compared with other saccharides, which varied between 0.3% and 5.1%. Compared with the control extracts prepared without enzymes, there were more significant increases of 1.19 ± 0.04 and 1.43 ± 0.09 in the sugar content after hydrolysis for the first and second batches, respectively. However, as shown in Figure 4, digestive fluids and electrolytes impacted the compositions of the different sugars. Total sugar quantity was significantly higher after the IVD of batch I extract. Moreover, trisaccharides (named “DP3” in Figure 2) in samples without glucoamylase have not been affected by digestive enzymes, in contrast with batch II. This suggests that digestive enzymes specifically target regions of carbohydrates that were already disturbed by bacterial enzymes. For the most part, sugar profiles and fermentability are essential to brewing beer [3,59].
Studies have shown that wheat mort (maltose, the main simple sugar) levels reach 45%, DP3 levels reach 15%, and glucose levels reach 10%. The same studies show that barley wort contains 54–60 g L−1 of maltose [15,59]. However, the analysis in this study demonstrates that most of the maltose was hydrolysed to glucose monomeric units with 60% H2SO4. The remaining maltose accounted for <3% of all the identified simple sugars in A. Sativa enzyme-assisted hydrolysates.
3.4.2. High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography Size Exclusion for Molecular Mass Distribution (HPLC-SEC)
HPLC-SEC was performed to evaluate the length of saccharides and see the alteration after static in vitro digestion (IVD). The approach was selected to compare the molecular masses of the sugars and the degree of polymerization (DP). The length of oligosaccharides is known to be 3–9 monomeric units (DP3-DP9). Furthermore, current studies indicate that oat carbohydrates lead to a higher short fatty acid content, which contributes to gut health and has a prebiotic potential [2,60]. As shown in Figure 5, oat control, a liquid phase sample without enzymes that was lyophilized before analysis consists of carbohydrates with a molecular mass of over 70,000 kDa. However, after the incorporation of enzymes, the molecular mass variation decreased to 7000 kDa and below. Studies report that a crystalline structure plays a vital role in starch digestibility [43,61]. GL cleaves smaller oligosaccharides and disaccharides into monomeric units, a crystalline structure, and a double-helix structure, which leads to a higher hydrolysis rate and may cause a higher GI [43]. However, after IVD, the molecular mass of all the samples was reduced to 700 kDa.
No increase in monomeric sugars was seen in Batch I of the hydrolysed oat extract (AS EAE I). This may be explained by the specificity of α-amylase. Another explanation may be rooted in the origin of the used α-amylase that was produced by T. ressei strains. For IVD simulation, animal origin α-amylase was used. Similarly, a monosaccharide, a disaccharide, and an oligosaccharide profile were produced by Bocchi et al. [17] for a commercial oat beverage that was digested using an in vitro protocol. In that study, the chromatograph identified higher DP1-DP2 rates that decreased after fermentation and a greater alteration of DP3-DP9 oligosaccharides.
These results demonstrate that digestive enzymes possess excellent access to oat polysaccharides and oligosaccharides. Moreover, AL and NSP, which include xylanases and beta-glucanases, produce higher levels of DP4 and DP3 [62]. These compounds may reduce the hydrolysis rate of IVD and water-soluble beta-glucan, as well as non-starch constituents that reduce the hydrolysis rate [63]. A complex matrix of food products that include proteins and lipids can reduce digestibility [64]. However, more comprehensive studies should be performed. According to the results, the lyophilized oat hydrophilic extract with AL and NSP enzymes is a promising ingredient for enriching food products with oligosaccharides [65].
3.5. Electronic Tongue PCA Evaluation of A. sativa Hydrophilic Extracts and Commercial OBD
Achieving the desired organoleptic properties of plant-based beverages depends on the technology and ingredients used, and taste and flavour may differ [66]. Moderate sweetness is one of the key parameters that consumers highly desire [67]. Oat-based beverages are popular and attractive because of their sweetness and soft consistency, which are attributed to their viscosity, which is turn is attributed to beta glucan molecules and released sugars during the production process. This creates similarity to dairy fat [68].
Previous studies have analysed the tastes of different plant-based beverages using electronic tongue devices. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, OBDs have never before been analysed using this method. The samples were tested using a commercial electronic tongue (αAstree, Alpha M.O.S.) with the aim of determining taste diversity. PCA (Figure 6) was mapped using the relative voltage responses of the ET sensors to the drink samples. The PCA statistical analysis showed that when using the two first principal components (PC1 and PC2), which covered 69.516% and 27.278% of the variance, the three samples (8, 9 and 10) could be differentiated. No differences were identified between samples 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. It can be surmised that the ingredients and the technology used, especially enzymatic hydrolysis, are among the main differentiation factors, along with the raw material type. Samples 8, 9, and 10 were separated as during OBD production, and additional additives were incorporated under the premise that they might produce more suitable technological products. However, the incorporation of these additional substances is intended to enhance the flavour and increase the desirability of the product.
Nine samples of oat drink beverages were tested, and similarities were identified. The sweetness of OBD is one of the key parameters due to the release of sugar molecules by the enzymatic hydrolysis. The authors suggest that the differences in the PCA plots are due to differences in sweetness. The hydrophilic extracts from batches I and II (named 2, 3, 4, and 5 in the graph) were similar to the commercial products tested and can be considered potential oat-based beverages with appealing flavour.
3.6. Microbial Count of Fermented Samples with Tibetan Kefir Grains and Birch Sap
After the enzyme-assisted extraction, hydrophilic extracts were collected and prepared for further fermentation with TKG and BS. After five days of fermentation, samples were filtered, and the quantities of mesophilic lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. (L. delbrueckii), and Streptoccocus thermophilus (S. thermophilus) were counted. These microbial strains represent a fraction of the LAB content. L. delbrueckii and S. thermophilus cultures are used in dairy yogurt production as well as in the fermentation of plant-based yogurts (e.g., with coconut cream, cashew, soy, and almond dairy substitutes) [69]. S. thermophilus, in a recent study, demonstrated increased lactic acid and total polyphenol content and DPPH• antioxidant activity in fermented jujube puree [70]. L. delbrueckii and S. thermophilus are also used for nondairy yogurt production using oat protein concentrate [71]. Table 3 presents classical yogurt bacterial growth using spontaneous fermentation with TKF and BS on differently hydrolysed hydrophilic extracts of A. sativa flour. All samples contained more of the mesophilic lactic bacteria L. delbrueckii and S. thermophilus than 8 log10 cfu/mL, indicating that both starters contained LAB. Further on, A. sativa samples that were additionally hydrolysed with glucoamylase and were fermented with birch sap (AS II (BS)) contained significantly more L. delbruckii and S. thermophilus compared with the first batch of hydrophilic extract of A. sativa with birch sap. This means that a higher concentration of reducing monomeric sugars increases the LAB content. Similar tendencies were observed in samples fermented with TKG. However, the L. delbrueckii count did not show a significant difference between samples AS I (TKG) and AS II (TKG).
Table 3.
Mesophilic Lactic Acid Bacteria Count | Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus | Streptococcus thermophilus | |
---|---|---|---|
cfu/ mL | |||
AS I (BS) | 2.3 × 108 d | 1.6 × 108 c | 1.8 × 108 d |
AS II (BS) | 7.6 × 108 a | 5.6 × 108 a | 6.7 × 108 a |
AS I (TKG) | 4.7 × 108 c | 4.0 × 108 b | 4.9 × 108 c |
AS II (TKG) | 5.5 × 108 b | 3.9 × 108 b | 6.2 × 108 b |
Different letters within the same column indicate significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05). AS I (BS)—Avena sativa batch I liquid fraction fermented with birch sap; AS II (BS)—Avena sativa batch II liquid fraction fermented with birch sap; AS I (TKG)—Avena sativa batch I liquid fraction fermented with Tibetian kefir grains; AS II (BS)—Avena sativa batch II liquid fraction fermented with Tibetan kefir grains.
In a recent study, L. delbrueckii in soy drink demonstrated stress protein production and inhibited growth [72]. This indicates that the protein origin is essential and that L. delbrueckii with S. thermophilus degrades oat proteins during fermentation [71]. However, fermentation did not appear to affect the observed textural properties. Nonetheless, the results revealed a promising application of OBD fermentation with TKG and BS. Plant-based beverage fermentation can decrease undesirable compounds like phytates and increase wanted flavour-forming compounds and LAB. In another study, fermented quinoa plant-based beverage reduced phytates by 60.2% after 6 h, increasing zinc and iron absorption [73].
3.7. Antimicrobial Properties against Gram—Positive and Gram—Negative Pathogenic Bacterias
It was determined that A. sativa extracts have higher phenolic content, antioxidant activity, levels of released sugars, and saccharide lengths, which impacted the growth of selected microbial strains. Extracts were fermented with TKG and birch sap and incubated for five days at a stable temperature of 28 °C. In this study, the antibacterial activity of fermented oat extracts was investigated against both Gram-positive (A. streptococci and S. aureus) and Gram-negative (P. aeruginosa and E. coli) bacteria strains (see Table 4). Interestingly, fermented samples with birch sap did not show antibacterial properties against selected strains. However, as shown in Table 4, fermented samples with TKG demonstrated antimicrobial properties against all four selected pathogenic strains. All A. sativa samples showed 1.2–5 times more antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacterial strains than Gram-negative strains. Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens comprises over 80% of the microorganisms found in TKG, making it the most abundant. However, more than 700 species have already been identified, 33 of which were probiotic species [74]. LAB is well known for inhibiting the growth of foodborne microorganisms, meaning that plant-based food fermentation is applicable for food biopreservation [75,76].
Table 4.
Bacterial Strains | Inhibition Zone ± SD, mm | ||
---|---|---|---|
A. sativa I (TKG) | A. sativa II (TKG) | ||
Gram-positive | S. aureus | 5.3 ± 0.10 b | 6.5 ± 0.15 a |
A. streptococci | 4.9 ± 0.60 c | 5.8 ± 0.20 d | |
Gram-negative | P. aeruginosa | 0.5± 0.10 e | 0.5 ± 0.10 e |
E. coli | 1.5 ± 0.60 f | 1.2 ± 0.50 f |
Values are expressed as mean and standard deviation calculated with triplicate determinations; different letters within the same column indicate significant differences (one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test, p < 0.05).
When comparing antibacterial properties between extracts I and II, the second batch was fermented with more released sugars than the first. This correlates with higher inhibition zones of Gram-positive strains but no significant difference for Gram-negative bacteria. Moreover, during fermentation, bacteriocins, antimicrobial peptides, and other fermentation end-products may impact antibacterial properties [11].
The results revealed that A. sativa fermented samples with TKG effectively suppress bacterial growth with an inhibition zone between 0.5 and 6.5 mm. Both extract samples showed slightly higher antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria (p < 0.05) due to the variation in their cell wall structure. As controls, two different antibiotics were used against pathogenic bacteria: for S. aureus, penicillin, inhibition zone 26 ± 0.50 mm; for E.coli, gentamicin, inhibition zone of 17 ± 0.45 mm.
4. Conclusions
The results indicate that there is a significant role to enzyme incorporation in extraction methods. Fibre and starch were disturbed, leading to the release of various lengths of saccharides and organic acids in aqueous extracts with cellulolytic and amylolytic enzymes. Extraction in mild conditions and safe solvents was evaluated as well, and the taste of the hydrophilic extracts of A. sativa was assessed using an e-tongue device. This device shows the potential sensory taste perception of beverages. The differentiation of monomeric sugar units and oligosaccharides, as performed in this study, opens the door to possible applications of fermented foods and the production of bio-preservatives.
Additional studies on complex food matrices could lead to future technologies that would allow for stable oligosaccharides after stimulated digestion. Significant applications can be further developed with oat spent grain, which may be appropriate for enzyme production and the purification of functional components. In summary, grain modification using enzyme-assisted extraction creates novel opportunities for developing higher value-added products and comprehensive applications for green synthesis development.
Acknowledgments
The work is partly attributed to the project the EUREKA Network Project E! 13496 “OHMDRINKS“ (No. 01.2.2-MITA-K-702-08-003).
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods11142055/s1, Figure S1. Samples are named in accordance to research Figure 5. Where 6—Commercial OBD_1 “Oatly”; 7—Commercial OBD_2 “Naturell Havre Dryck”; 8—Commercial OBD_3 “Bio Organic Oat Drink”; 9—Commercial OBD_4 “Valsoia”; 10—Commercial OBD_5 “Alpro”.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.S. and J.V.; methodology, P.S., D.U., A.B. and P.V.; writing—original draft preparation, P.S., D.U., A.B. and J.V.; writing—review and editing, P.S., J.V., D.U., P.V. and T.D.L.; visualization, P.S., E.M., J.K., J.V. and Z.L.; formal analysis, J.V., P.S., V.P. and D.U.; resources, P.V.; funding acquisition, P.V.; investigation, P.S., E.M., J.K., A.B., D.U. and V.P.; supervision, P.V. and D.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.
Conflicts of Interest
The company Roquette Amilina’s role was technical support, Jurgita Kailiuviene and Edita Mazoniene participated in part of experimental design investigations. Roquette Amilina has no conflicts of interest with this research. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Aschemann-Witzel J., Varela P., Peschel A.O. Consumers’ Categorization of Food Ingredients: Do Consumers Perceive Them as ‘Clean Label’ Producers Expect? An Exploration with Projective Mapping. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019;71:117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huang K., Zhang S., Guan X., Li C., Li S., Liu Y., Shi J. Effect of the Oat β-Glucan on the Development of Functional Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild) Milk. Food Chem. 2021;349:129201. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cortivo P.R.D., Hickert L.R., Rosa C.A., Ayub M.A.Z. Conversion of Fermentable Sugars from Hydrolysates of Soybean and Oat Hulls into Ethanol and Xylitol by Spathaspora hagerdaliae UFMG-CM-Y303. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020;146:112218. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Karimi R., Azizi M.H., Xu Q. Effect of Different Enzymatic Extractions on Molecular Weight Distribution, Rheological and Microstructural Properties of Barley Bran β-Glucan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;126:298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jeske S., Zannini E., Cronin M.F., Arendt E.K. Impact of Protease and Amylase Treatment on Proteins and the Product Quality of a Quinoa-Based Milk Substitute. Food Funct. 2018;9:3500–3508. doi: 10.1039/C8FO00336J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Patra T., Axel C., Rinnan Å., Olsen K. The Physicochemical Stability of Oat-Based Drinks. J. Cereal Sci. 2022;104:103422. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2022.103422. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen D., Shi J., Hu X., Du S. Alpha-Amylase Treatment Increases Extractable Phenolics and Antioxidant Capacity of Oat (Avena nuda L.) Flour. J. Cereal Sci. 2015;65:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.06.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Craig W.J., Fresán U. International Analysis of the Nutritional Content and a Review of Health Benefits of Non-Dairy Plant-Based Beverages. Nutrients. 2021;13:842. doi: 10.3390/nu13030842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stephanie J., Emanuele Z., Arendt E.K. Elke Evaluation of Physicochemical and Glycaemic Properties of Commercial Plant-Based Milk Substitutes. Mater. Veg. 2017;72:26–33. doi: 10.1007/s11130-016-0583-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Atkinson F.S., Foster-Powell K., Brand-Miller J.C. International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values: 2008. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:2281–2283. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marco M.L., Sanders M.E., Gänzle M., Arrieta M.C., Cotter P.D., Vuyst L.D., Hill C., Holzapfel W., Lebeer S., Merenstein D., et al. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) Consensus Statement on Fermented Foods. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;18:196–208. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-00390-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Diez-Ozaeta I., Astiazaran O.J. Fermented Foods: An Update on Evidence-Based Health Benefits and Future Perspectives. Food Res. Int. 2022;156:111133. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baptista S.L., Romaní A., Domingues L. Biotechnological Advancements, Innovations and Challenges for Sustainable Xylitol Production by Yeast. In: Zaragoza Ó., Casadevall A., editors. Encyclopedia of Mycology. Elsevier; Oxford, UK: pp. 420–427. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cortivo P.R.D., Hickert L.R., Hector R., Ayub M.A.Z. Fermentation of Oat and Soybean Hull Hydrolysates into Ethanol and Xylitol by Recombinant Industrial Strains of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae under Diverse Oxygen Environments. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018;113:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alfeo V., Francesco G.D., Sileoni V., Blangiforti S., Palmeri R., Aerts G., Perretti G., Todaro A. Physicochemical Properties, Sugar Profile, and Non-Starch Polysaccharides Characterization of Old Wheat Malt Landraces. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2021;102:103997. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.103997. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Delgado G.T.C., Tamashiro W.M.d.S.C. Role of Prebiotics in Regulation of Microbiota and Prevention of Obesity. Food Res. Int. 2018;113:183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bocchi S., Rocchetti G., Elli M., Lucini L., Lim C.-Y., Morelli L. The Combined Effect of Fermentation of Lactic Acid Bacteria and in Vitro Digestion on Metabolomic and Oligosaccharide Profile of Oat Beverage. Food Res. Int. 2021;142:110216. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu H., Liu H.-N., Ma A.-M., Zhou J.-Z., Xia X.-D. Synergetic Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Rhizopus oryzae on Physicochemical, Nutritional and Antioxidant Properties of Whole-Grain Oats (Avena sativa L.) during Solid-State Fermentation. LWT. 2022;154:112687. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112687. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ross R.P., Morgan S., Hill C. Preservation and Fermentation: Past, Present and Future. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002;79:3–16. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00174-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Deo S., Turton K.L., Kainth T., Kumar A., Wieden H.-J. Strategies for Improving Antimicrobial Peptide Production. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022;59:107968. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.107968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Theuretzbacher U. Global Antibacterial Resistance: The Never-Ending Story. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2013;1:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2013.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kalu I.C., Kao C.M., Fritz S.A. Management and Prevention of Staphylococcus Aureus Infections in Children. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2022;36:73–100. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee Y., Oh H., Seo Y., Kang J., Park E., Yoon Y. Risk and Socio-Economic Impact for Staphylococcus aureus Foodborne Illness by Ready-to-Eat Salad Consumption. Microb. Risk Anal. 2022;21:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.mran.2022.100219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mozaffari P., Berizi E., Hosseinzadeh S., Derakhshan Z., Taghadosi V., Montaseri Z., Götz F. Isolation and Characterization of E. coli O157: H7 Novel Bacteriophage for Controlling This Food-Borne Pathogen. Virus Res. 2022;315:198754. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2022.198754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Anjum M.F., Schmitt H., Börjesson S., Berendonk T.U., Donner E., Stehling E.G., Boerlin P., Topp E., Jardine C., Li X., et al. The Potential of Using E. coli as an Indicator for the Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) in the Environment. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021;64:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Plessas S., Nouska C., Mantzourani I., Kourkoutas Y., Alexopoulos A., Bezirtzoglou E. Microbiological Exploration of Different Types of Kefir Grains. Fermentation. 2017;3:1. doi: 10.3390/fermentation3010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zheng Y.A.L. Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus Strains Isolated from Tibetan Kefir Grains. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e69868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gao W., Zhang L. Comparative Analysis of the Microbial Community Composition between Tibetan Kefir Grains and Milks. Food Res. Int. 2019;116:137–144. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mingaila J., Čiuldienė D., Viškelis P., Bartkevičius E., Vilimas V., Armolaitis K. The quantity and biochemical composition of sap collected from silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) trees growing in different soils. Forests. 2020;11:365. doi: 10.3390/f11040365. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Paulikienė S., Mingaila J., Vilimas V., Bartkevičius E., Viskelis P., Raila A. Influence of Ozone on the Biochemical Composition of Birch Sap. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:2965. doi: 10.3390/app11072965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nikolajeva V., Zommere Z. Changes of Physicochemical Properties and Predominant Microbiota during Storage of Birch Sap. Int. Food Res. J. 2018;25:527–533. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Semjonovs P., Denina I., Fomina A., Patetko A., Auzina L., Upite D., Upitis A., Danilevics A. Development of Birch (Betula pendula Roth.) Sap Based Probiotic Fermented Beverage. Int. Food Res. J. 2014;21:1763–1767. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Minekus M., Alminger M., Alvito P., Ballance S., Bohn T., Bourlieu C., Carrière F., Boutrou R., Corredig M., Dupont D., et al. A Standardised Static in vitro Digestion Method Suitable for Food—An International Consensus. Food Funct. 2014;5:1113–1124. doi: 10.1039/C3FO60702J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Štreimikytė P., Keršienė M., Eisinaitė V., Jasutienė I., Lesauskaitė V., Damulevičienė G., Knašienė J., Leskauskaitė D. Formulating Protein-based Beverages for the Dysphagia Diets of the Elderly: Viscosity, Protein Quality, in vitro Digestion, and Consumers Acceptability. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020;100:3895–3901. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Štreimikytė P., Urbonavičienė D., Balčiūnaitienė A., Viškelis P., Viškelis J. Optimization of the Multienzyme-Assisted Extraction Procedure of Bioactive Compounds Extracts from Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum M.) and Evaluation of Obtained Extracts. Plants. 2021;10:2567. doi: 10.3390/plants10122567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Viskelis P., Rubinskienė M., Bobinaitė R., Dambrauskienė E. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of small fruits in Lithuania. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2010;8:259–263. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Singleton V.L., Orthofer R., Lamuela-Raventós R.M. Methods in Enzymology. Volume 299. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 1999. Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent; pp. 152–178. Oxidants and Antioxidants Part A. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brand-Williams W., Cuvelier M.E., Berset C. Use of a Free Radical Method to Evaluate Antioxidant Activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995;28:25–30. doi: 10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Bobinaitė R., Viskelis P., Bobinas Č., Mieželienė A., Alenčikienė G., Venskutonis P.R. Raspberry marc extracts increase antioxidative potential, ellagic acid, ellagitannin and anthocyanin concentrations in fruit purees. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016;66:460–467. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.10.069. ISSN 0023-6438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Benzie I.F.F., Strain J.J. The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a Measure of “Antioxidant Power”: The FRAP Assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996;239:70. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pascual L., Gras M., Vidal-Brotóns D., Alcañiz M., Martínez-Máñez R., Ros-Lis J.V. A Voltammetric E-Tongue Tool for the Emulation of the Sensorial Analysis and the Discrimination of Vegetal Milks. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018;270:231–238. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2018.04.151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Rodríguez-Sanz A., Fuciños C., Torrado A.M., Rúa M.L. Extraction of the Wheat Straw Hemicellulose Fraction Assisted by Commercial Endo-Xylanases. Role of the Accessory Enzyme Activities. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022;179:114655. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114655. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang J., Zhang M., Bai X., Zhang Y., Wang C. The Impact of High Hydrostatic Pressure Treatment Time on the Structure, Gelatinization and Thermal Properties and in Vitro Digestibility of Oat Starch. Grain Oil Sci. Technol. 2022;5:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.gaost.2022.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Milićević N., Kojić P., Sakač M., Mišan A., Kojić J., Perussello C., Banjac V., Pojić M., Tiwari B. Kinetic Modelling of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Phenolics from Cereal Brans. Ultrason. Sonochemistry. 2021;79:105761. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Meyvantsson I., Beebe D.J. Cell Culture Models in Microfluidic Systems. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2008;1:423–449. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anchem.1.031207.113042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.González M.J.A., Carrera C., Barbero G.F., Palma M. A Comparison Study between Ultrasound–Assisted and Enzyme–Assisted Extraction of Anthocyanins from Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) Food Chem X. 2022;13:100192. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2021.100192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yi-Ge Z., Huan K., Sheng-Xiong C., Kiran T., Shaoyun W., Jian-Guo Z., Ya-Fang S., Zhao-Jun W. Comparison of Phenolic Compounds Extracted from Diaphragma juglandis Fructus, Walnut Pellicle, and Flowers of Juglans Regia Using Methanol, Ultrasonic Wave, and Enzyme Assisted-Extraction. Food Chem. 2020;321:126672. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Domínguez-Rodríguez G., Marina M.L., Plaza M. Enzyme-Assisted Extraction of Bioactive Non-Extractable Polyphenols from Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L.) Pomace. Food Chem. 2021;339:128086. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gligor O., Mocan A., Moldovan C., Locatelli M., Crișan G., Ferreira I.C.F.R. Enzyme-Assisted Extractions of Polyphenols—A Comprehensive Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019;88:302–315. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.03.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen C., Wang L., Wang R., Luo X., Li Y., Li J., Li Y., Chen Z. Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction from Defatted Oat (Avena sativa L.) Bran to Simultaneously Enhance Phenolic Compounds and β-Glucan Contents: Compositional and Kinetic Studies. J. Food Eng. 2018;222:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.11.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mihanfar A., Darband S.G., Sadighparvar S., Kaviani M., Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari M., Yousefi B., Majidinia M. In Vitro and in Vivo Anticancer Effects of Syringic Acid on Colorectal Cancer: Possible Mechanistic View. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2021;337:109337. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kim I.-S., Hwang C.-W., Yang W.-S., Kim C.-H. Multiple Antioxidative and Bioactive Molecules of Oats (Avena sativa L.) in Human Health. Antioxidants. 2021;10:1454. doi: 10.3390/antiox10091454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cai S., Huang C., Ji B., Zhou F., Wise M.L., Zhang D., Yang P. In Vitro Antioxidant Activity and Inhibitory Effect, on Oleic Acid-Induced Hepatic Steatosis, of Fractions and Subfractions from Oat (Avena sativa L.) Ethanol Extract. Food Chem. 2011;124:900–905. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hou Y., Peng S., Song Z., Bai F., Li X., Fang J. Oat Polyphenol Avenanthramide-2c Confers Protection from Oxidative Stress by Regulating the Nrf2-ARE Signaling Pathway in PC12 Cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2021;706:108857. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Balčiūnaitienė A., Liaudanskas M., Puzerytė V., Viškelis J., Janulis V., Viškelis P., Griškonis E., Jankauskaitė V. Eucalyptus Globulus and Salvia Officinalis Extracts Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Application as an Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Agent. Plants. 2022;11:1085. doi: 10.3390/plants11081085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Al-khattaf F.S. Gold and Silver Nanoparticles: Green Synthesis, Microbes, Mechanism, Factors, Plant Disease Management and Environmental Risks. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021;28:3624–3631. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.03.078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Wagner E., Pería M.E., Ortiz G.E., Rojas N.L., Ghiringhelli P.D. Valorization of Brewer’s Spent Grain by Different Strategies of Structural Destabilization and Enzymatic Saccharification. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021;163:113329. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bharti A.K., Kumar A., Kumar A., Dutt D. Exploitation of Parthenium hysterophorous Biomass as Low-Cost Substrate for Cellulase and Xylanase Production under Solid-State Fermentation Using Talaromyces stipitatus MTCC 12687. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2018;11:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.jrras.2018.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Francesco G.D., Sannino C., Sileoni V., Marconi O., Filippucci S., Tasselli G., Turchetti B. Mrakia Gelida in Brewing Process: An Innovative Production of Low Alcohol Beer Using a Psychrophilic Yeast Strain. Food Microbiol. 2018;76:354–362. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2018.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Cicero A.F.G., Fogacci F., Veronesi M., Strocchi E., Grandi E., Rizzoli E., Poli A., Marangoni F., Borghi C. A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Medium-Term Effects of Oat Fibres on Human Health: The Beta-Glucan Effects on Lipid Profile, Glycemia and InTestinal Health (BELT) Study. Nutrients. 2020;12:686. doi: 10.3390/nu12030686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zavareze E.d.R., Dias A.R.G. Impact of Heat-Moisture Treatment and Annealing in Starches: A Review. Carbohyd. Polym. 2011;83:317–328. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Trogh I., Courtin C.M., Andersson A.A.M., Åman P., Sørensen J.F., Delcour J.A. The Combined Use of Hull-Less Barley Flour and Xylanase as a Strategy for Wheat/Hull-Less Barley Flour Breads with Increased Arabinoxylan and (1→3,1→4)-β-D-Glucan Levels. J. Cereal Sci. 2004;40:257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2004.08.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tang M., Wang L., Cheng X., Wu Y., Ouyang J. Non-Starch Constituents Influence the in Vitro Digestibility of Naked Oat (Avena nuda L.) Starch. Food Chem. 2019;297:124953. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.124953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang J., Luo K., Zhang G. Impact of Native Form Oat β-Glucan on Starch Digestion and Postprandial Glycemia. J. Cereal Sci. 2017;73:84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2016.11.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pimentel T.C., de Assis B.B.T., Rocha C.d.S., Marcolino V.A., Rosset M., Magnani M. Prebiotics in Non-Dairy Products: Technological and Physiological Functionality, Challenges, and Perspectives. Food Biosci. 2022;46:101585. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Oduro A.F., Saalia F.K., Adjei M.Y.B. Sensory Acceptability and Proximate Composition of 3-Blend Plant-Based Dairy Alternatives. Foods. 2021;10:482. doi: 10.3390/foods10030482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Leahu A., Ropciuc S., Ghinea C. Plant-Based Milks: Alternatives to the Manufacture and Characterization of Ice Cream. Appl. Sci. 2022;12:1754. doi: 10.3390/app12031754. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Cardello A.V., Llobell F., Giacalone D., Roigard C.M., Jaeger S.R. Plant-Based Alternatives vs Dairy Milk: Consumer Segments and Their Sensory, Emotional, Cognitive and Situational Use Responses to Tasted Products. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022;100:104599. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Montemurro M., Pontonio E., Coda R., Rizzello C.G. Plant-Based Alternatives to Yogurt: State-of-the-Art and Perspectives of New Biotechnological Challenges. Foods. 2021;10:316. doi: 10.3390/foods10020316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Li J., Zhao W., Pan X., Lao F., Liao X., Shi Y., Wu J. Improvement of Antioxidant Properties of Jujube Puree by Biotransformation of Polyphenols via Streptococcus thermophilus Fermentation. Food Chem. X. 2022;13:100214. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Brückner-Gühmann M., Vasil’eva E., Culetu A., Duta D., Sozer N., Drusch S. Oat Protein Concentrate as Alternative Ingredient for Non-dairy Yoghurt-type Product. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019;99:5852–5857. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Jan G., Tarnaud F., do Carmo F.L.R., Illikoud N., Canon F., Jardin J., Briard-Bion V., Guyomarc’h F., Gagnaire V. The Stressing Life of Lactobacillus Delbrueckii Subsp. Bulgaricus in Soy Milk. Food Microbiol. 2022;106:104042. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2022.104042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ayub M., Castro-Alba V., Lazarte C.E. Development of an Instant-Mix Probiotic Beverage Based on Fermented Quinoa with Reduced Phytate Content. J. Funct. Food. 2021;87:104831. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104831. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zeng X., Wang Y., Jia H., Wang Z., Gao Z., Luo Y., Sheng Q., Yuan Y., Yue T. Metagenomic Analysis of Microflora Structure and Functional Capacity in Probiotic Tibetan Kefir Grains. Food Res. Int. 2022;151:110849. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Ricci A., Bernini V., Maoloni A., Cirlini M., Galaverna G., Neviani E., Lazzi C. Vegetable By-Product Lacto-Fermentation as a New Source of Antimicrobial Compounds. Microorganisms. 2019;7:607. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7120607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ricci A., Bertani G., Maoloni A., Bernini V., Levante A., Neviani E., Lazzi C. Antimicrobial Activity of Fermented Vegetable Byproduct Extracts for Food Applications. Foods. 2021;10:1092. doi: 10.3390/foods10051092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.