Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
. 2022 Jul 14;11(14):4082. doi: 10.3390/jcm11144082

Infective Endocarditis in People Who Inject Drugs: Report from the Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis

Enrico Cecchi 1, Silvia Corcione 2, Tommaso Lupia 3,*, Ilaria De Benedetto 2, Nour Shbaklo 2, Fabio Chirillo 4, Antonella Moreo 5, Mauro Rinaldi 6, Pompilio Faggiano 7, Moreno Cecconi 8, Olivia Bargiacchi 9, Alessandro Cialfi 10, Stefano Del Ponte 11, Angelo Squeri 12, Oscar Gaddi 13, Maria Gabriella Carmina 14, Alessandro Lazzaro 2, Giovannino Ciccone 15, Anna Castiglione 15, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa 2,3
Editors: Manuel Martínez-Sellés, Patricia Muñoz
PMCID: PMC9319987  PMID: 35887843

Abstract

Intravenous drug use is a predisposing condition for infective endocarditis (IE). We report the clinical features of IE, taken from the Italian Registry of IE, in people who inject drugs (PWIDs). The registry prospectively collected epidemiological, clinical, in-hospital, and follow-up data on patients with IE from 17 Italian centers. A total of 677 patients were enrolled, and 61 (9%) were intravenous drug users (IDUs). Most PWIDs were male (78.6%), and aged between 41 and 50 years old (50%). The most frequent comorbidities were HIV (34.4%) and chronic liver disease (32%). Predisposing factors for IE were present in 6.5% of the patients, and 10% had minor valvular abnormalities. IE had occurred previously in 16.4% of the patients, and 50% of them had undergone heart surgery. Overall mortality was 9.8% in IDUs and 20% in patients with recurrent IE. IE in PWIDs mostly affected the native valves (90%). The echocardiographic diagnosis of IE was based on the detection of vegetation in 91.82% of cases. Staphylococcus aureus was the main microorganism isolated (70%) from blood cultures. Thirty patients (49%) underwent heart surgery: thirteen had aortic valves, eleven had mitral valves, and six had tricuspid valve interventions. IE in PWIDs was relatively common, and patients with native valve right-sided IE had a better prognosis, with a low rate of surgical interventions.

Keywords: infective endocarditis, PWID, HIV, endovascular infections, IVDU

1. Introduction

Intravenous drug use is a predisposing condition for infective endocarditis (IE) and represents a minor diagnostic criterion for diagnosis [1]. In the last decade, the incidence of IE in people who inject drugs (PWIDs) has sometimes declined because of a general switch from intravenous to other routes of drug intake (i.e., intranasal, smoking, or oral) as well as damage reduction policies implemented in the 1990s for HIV prevention [2]. However, there are reports, especially in the United States, of increasing hospitalization for IE in PWIDs among the younger white female demographic [3].

Currently, IE in the general population remains a relatively rare disease, with a high in-hospital mortality rate, ranging from 15 to 26% depending on the case series and an even greater morbidity rate, due mainly to heart failure or valvular vegetations with high embolic potentials [2,3]. Prognostic improvements are difficult and should be focused on early diagnosis, multidisciplinary management, and optimization of the timing and techniques of cardiac surgery [4,5]. Historically, PWIDs with right-sided endocarditis have consistently been considered to have better prognoses, potentially with shorter antibiotic therapy courses, outpatient treatment, and ad hoc strategies of cardiosurgery. Unfortunately, the literature shows that more than one-third of PWIDs may present with left-sided IE and a dismal prognosis [2,3,5,6,7].

Data recently published by the Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis (RIEI) indicated that, despite continuous epidemiological changes, IE in PWIDs still represents 9% of IE enrolled in the RIEI [2]. We report here the epidemiological and clinical features of IE in PWIDs from the RIEI.

2. Materials and Methods

RIEI prospectively collected epidemiological, clinical, in-hospital, and follow-up data on patients with IE established according to the modified Duke criteria [1] from 17 Italian centers coordinated by the Cardiology Unit of Maria Vittoria Hospital in Turin.

RIEI has prospectively enrolled consecutive cases of infective endocarditis in every participating center, analyzing diagnostic and therapeutic data from a real world practice perspective. No experimental interventions were proposed, and treatments were entirely decided by treating physicians. Enrollment required the following features: (1) high clinical suspicion of acute and/or active infective endocarditis (definite or highly possible infective endocarditis according to Duke criteria), (2) consecutive recruitment and prospective evaluation at presentation, (3) sufficient data availability to fulfill enrolment and follow-up records, and (4) enrollment of consecutive cases and strict monitoring of suspected cases in the laboratory of echocardiography as well as in the microbiology laboratory for identification of microorganisms. For the purposes of the present study, only cases with definite IE according to modified Duke criteria and complete echocardiographic data have been included.

Complete methods and data acquisition and storage methods, together with definitions and procedures, have already been published [2].

3. Results

Of the 677 patients enrolled in the RIEI, 61 were intravenous drug users (IDUs) (9%). The main clinical characteristics and comorbidities, compared with the remaining patients in the RIEI registry, are reported in Table 1. PWIDs were predominantly male (78.6%), middle-aged (50% of PWIDs were between 41 and 50 years old), and with chronic liver disease (32%) or chronic heart disease (28%). Only 6.5% (4) of patients had predisposing factors for IE, and 10% had minor valvular abnormalities (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patient characteristics and comorbidities.

PWIDs n (%) Non-PWIDs n (%) Total n (%)
Sex
 Male 48 (78.69) 444 (27.92) 492 (27.33)
 Female 13 (21.31) 172 (72.08) 185 (72.67)
Age Class (years)
 <40 28 (45.9) 52 (8.44) 80 (11.82)
 41–50 31 (50.82) 61 (9.9) 92 (13.59)
 51–60 2 (3.28) 93 (15.1) 95 (14.03)
 61–70 0 157 (25.49) 157 (23.19)
 71–80 0 193 (31.33) 193 (28.51)
 >80 0 60 (9.74) 60 (8.86)
Ongoing IDU 61 (100) 0 61 (9.01)
History of IDU 61 (100) 22 (3.75) 83 (12.26)
Comorbidities
 Cancer 1 (1.64) 65 (10.55) 66 (9.75)
 COPD 1 (1.64) 64 (10.39) 65 (9.6)
 History of acute myocardial infarction 0 47 (7.63) 47 (6.94)
 Ischemic heart diseases 1 (1.64) 94 (15.26) 95 (14.03)
 Hypertension 1 (1.64) 256 (41.56) 257 (37.96)
 Renal failure 4 (6.56) 81 (13.15) 85 (12.56)
 Alcoholism 1 (1.64) 21 (3.41) 22 (3.25)
 Peripheral arterial disease 1 (1.64) 46 (7.47) 47 (6.94)
 Chronic liver disease 20 (32.79) 44 (7.14) 64 (9.45)
 Peptic ulcer 1 (1.64) 17 (2.76) 18 (2.66)
 Neurologic vascular diseases 0 35(5.68) 35(5.17)
 Stroke 0 29(4.71) 29 (4.28)
 HIV-positive 21(34,42) 19 (3.06) 40 (5.8)
 AIDS 9 (14.75) 7(1.1) 16 (2.3%)
Procedures
 Dental 1 (1.64) 31 (5.03) 32 (4.73)
 Intravenous catheter 6 (9.84) 152 (24.68) 158 (23.34)
 Other invasive procedures 4 (6.56) 135 (21.75) 149 (22.01)

Abbreviations: IDU: intravenous drug use; PWID: people who inject drugs; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.

Previous cases of IE had occurred in 16.4% (10) of patients, and 50% of them underwent heart surgery. Overall mortality was 9.8% in IDUs, but it rose to 20% in patients with recurrent IE.

IE in PWIDs mostly affected the native valves (55; 90%), especially the left-side valves (29; 53%). Prosthetic valve IE was reported in 6.5% of patients (four; two aortic and two tricuspid) and in two cases with endocavitary devices. Twenty-one PWIDs (34.42%) were HIV-positive, and 33% of them had a CD4 level <200/mm3.

The most prominent sign was a fever of >38 °C, which was present in 100% of IE cases. Clinical vascular embolic events were found in 18% of patients upon physical examination, while imaging studies disclosed pulmonary infarction in 21% of patients. An acute clinical course led to immediate hospital admission in 40% of patients, and within 7 days in 31% of patients. In both instances, the rate of hospital admission after medical consultation was faster than for the other patients in the RIEI. Echocardiographic diagnoses of IE were based on the detection of vegetation in 91.82% of patients and on a myocardial abscess in 13%.

Blood cultures were positive in 82% of cases, and Staphylococcus aureus was the main microorganism isolated (70%), with a methicillin resistance rate of 12.5% (Table 2).

Table 2.

Blood culture results and microorganisms isolated in positive blood cultures.

PWIDs n (%) Non-PWIDs n (%) Total n (%)
Positive blood culture 50 (81.97) 442 (71.75) 492 (72.67)
Staphylococcus aureus 35 (70) 98 (22.17) 133 (27.03)
Staphylococcus epidermidis 4 (8) 57 (12.9) 61 (12.4)
 Coagulase-negative Staphylococci 1 (2) 43 (9.73) 44 (8.94)
Streptococcus bovis 0 57 (12.9) 57 (11.59)
Streptococcus viridans 5 (10) 68 (15.38) 73 (14.84)
Staphylococcus lugdunensis 0 3 (0.68) 3 (0.61)
Enterococcus faecalis 3 (6) 67 (15.16) 70 (14.23)
 HACEK group 0 6 (1.36) 6 (1.22)
Enterococcus faecium 0 5 (1.13) 5 (1.02)
Escherichia coli 0 11 (2.49) 11 (2.24)
Klebsiella spp. 0 4 (0.9) 4 (0.81)
Pseudomonas spp. 3 (6) 1 (0.23) 4 (0.81)
Negative blood culture 8 (13.11) 161 (26.14) 169 (24.96)

Abbreviations: PWIDs: people who inject drugs; HACEK group: Haemophilus species, Aggregatibacter species, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella species.

The second most frequent microorganism was Streptococcus viridans (10%), usually occurring in patients with poor oral hygiene (78%). Infections were mostly community-acquired (53; 87%), and only six cases (9.8%) were nosocomial.

Thirty patients (49%) underwent heart surgery: thirteen with aortic valve replacements (three associated with mitral valve surgery), eleven with mitral valve interventions (four repairs) of which two were associated with tricuspid valve replacement, and six with further tricuspid valve interventions (four replacements). The indications for tricuspid valve surgery were pulmonary embolism with a large residual vegetation in two cases, bacteremia or persistent infection in two cases, and severe tricuspid regurgitation and large vegetation in two cases. All patients undergoing tricuspid valve surgery had severe valvular insufficiency. Many of the 22 cases undergoing left-sided valve surgery had multiple indications; severe or moderate-severe valvular insufficiencies and vegetations > 10 mm occurred in 17 cases (77%). In addition, 13 patients (59%) had heart failure, 10 (45%) had previous embolic events, 5 (22%) presented with myocardial abscesses, and 3 (13%) had persistent bacteremia. Pulmonary infarction was found in 26% of PWID cases, occurring more frequently than in IE cases in the general population (Table 3).

Table 3.

IE site and complications.

PWIDs n (%) Non-PWIDs n (%) Total n (%)
IE site
 Native valve 55 (11.17) 437 (88.82) 492 (100)
 Prosthetic valve 6 (3.24) 179 (96.75) 185 (100)
Common complications associated with IE
 Pulmonary infarction 16 (26.23) 32 (5.19) 48 (7.09)
 Pulmonary edema 9 (14.75) 65 (10.55) 74 (10.93)
 Intracranial hemorrhage 4 (6.56) 28 (4.55) 32 (4.73)
 Mycotic aneurysm 4 (6.56) 21 (3.41) 25 (3.69)
 Pulmonary infarction 16 (26.23) 32 (5.19) 48 (7.09)
 Pulmonary edema 9 (14.75) 65 (10.55) 74 (10.93)
 Intracranial hemorrhage 4 (6.56) 28 (4.55) 32 (4.73)
 Mycotic aneurysm 4 (6.56) 21 (3.41) 25 (3.69)

IE: infective endocarditis; PWID: People who inject drugs.

Twenty-six patients had right-side IE (twenty-four with native valves and two with prosthetic valves). In this group, all patients had high fever, but none had neurological symptoms. Three had systemic embolic events, seven presented with heart failure (three right, two left, and two mixed), ten had septic pulmonary infarction, ten presented with severe tricuspid valve insufficiencies, and eight (30%) underwent tricuspid valve surgery (three plastic repairs). None had pulmonary oedema. There was only one death in this group (3.8%) observed in a HIV-positive patient with low CD4+ lymphocyte count.

Ten out of the twenty-one HIV-positive patients presented with heart failure (one right, five left, and four mixed), which was severe in five cases. In-hospital complications occurred in 14 patients, mostly with stroke, followed by systemic embolic events and septic pulmonary infarction. Eleven of the twenty-one patients underwent cardiosurgery (52%), mostly for aortic or mitral valve replacements (five and five, respectively). The in-hospital mortality rate for this group was 19%.

4. Discussion

Even in the absence of heart disease, IDU is considered a predisposing condition for IE in developed countries, but the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of IE in PWIDs are continuously evolving [2,3]. PWIDs account for 9% of the patients enrolled in RIEI, a higher percentage than that recently found by Ortiz-Bautista et al. and Alkhawam et al., with 5% and 4.3%, respectively, but slightly lower than the data reported in a prospective survey conducted in Piedmont, Italy, in 2001 [5,6,8].

In contrast to some reports, but in agreement with other studies, the overall prognosis of IE in PWIDs is still variable, despite the high frequency of heart surgery (49%). It is slightly lower than in the general IE population, with a mortality rate of 9.8%, rising to 20% in relapsing events [6,9]. As reported in previous studies, our findings show that the mortality rate is very low (3.8%) in patients with isolated right-sided IE, even though almost 30% of patients in this group underwent heart surgery [10]. As in other reports, HIV-seropositive patients in the RIEI cohort had a less favorable prognosis, with a mortality rate of 19%, despite a high rate of referral for heart surgery (52%) in Italian centers for patients with left heart involvement [6,11]. Moreover, as expected, relapsed IE is associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Our data highlight some new features of IE in PWIDs, such as the increasing median age of patients; they are older than previously reported (41 to 50 years old), probably because they are being referred to care later in life when comorbidities may be present. Indeed, 6.1% of patients already had IE, 10% had prosthetic heart valves, and two patients had endocavitary devices. Notably, more than 30% of cases are HIV-seropositive, with poor responses probably due to a lower compliance with treatment. In our study, HIV-positive PWIDs with IE were up to 50 years old and had a prolonged history of intravenous drug use and more advanced heart disease than in the past [12]. These facts account for the frequent complications and higher mortality rates, as opposed to those of non-IDU IE patients of more advanced age, who more commonly present with left heart involvement. Relapsing IE is associated with previous surgeries, left-side IE, and continuous intravenous drug abuse. It has a high mortality rate. These data highlight the need for evidence-based protocols aimed at managing drug abuse to reduce relapses and improve outcomes in these patients. This brief report has several limitations. First, RIEI is an observational study performed in both referral and non-referral centers for IE, with the prevalent involvement of Cardiological and Cardiosurgical wards as opposed to Infectious Disease wards. Potential selection bias is probably present in these settings, as 45% of patients are referred to study centers from other hospitals. Furthermore, due to the brief nature of this report, some data on treatment regimens and a complete dataset with stratifications for mortality are lacking.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, IE in PWIDs was relatively common in our registry, and patients with native valve right-sided IE had a better prognosis, with a low rate of surgical interventions. The mortality rate was high in patients who experienced a relapse due to prolonged use of injected opioids, left heart involvement, or a positive HIV status. Our preliminary data add to the growing body of evidence demonstrating increasing concerns about substance misuse and injection-mediated risk and suggest the need for public health interventions and clinical policies to manage drug abusers. Further analyses are needed to complete the evaluation of these preliminary findings.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all the RIEI Investigators: Enrico Cecchi, Massimo Imazio, Silvia Ferro, Cristina Cecchi, and Rita Trinchero (Cardiology Department, Maria Vittoria Hospital, Torino, Italy); Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, and Filippo Lipani (Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin; Infectious Diseases at Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Torino, Italy); Pietro Caramello and Antonio Macor (Infectious Diseases Department, Amedeo di Savoia Hospital, Torino, Italy); Fabio Chirillo, Alessandra Pedrocco, Piergiorgio Scotton, and Francesco Rocco (Department of Cardiology, Infectious Diseases and Cardiac Surgery, Ca’ Foncello Hospital, Treviso, Italy); Pompilio Faggiano, Elisa Locantore, and Giacomo Faden (Cardiology Department, Brescia Hospital, University of Brescia, Italy); Moreno Cecconi and Carla Manca (Cardiology Department, Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy); Antonella Moreo, Benedetta De Chiara, and Stefania Cataldo (Cardiology Department, Niguarda Ca’ Granda Hospital, Milano, Italy); Alessandro Cialfi and Simone Colombo (Cardiology Department, Sacco Hospital, Milano, Italy); Mauro Rinaldi, Paolo Sorrentino, and Samuel Mancuso (Cardiac Surgery Department, Molinette Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy); Stefano Del Ponte, Riccardo Casabona, and Roberto Flocco (Cardiac Surgery Department, Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy); Angelo Squeri (Cardiology Outpatient Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma, Parma, Italy); Oscar Gaddi (Cardiology Department, Reggio Emilia Hospital, Reggio Emilia, Italy); Francesco Enia and Maria Gabriella Carmina (Cardiology Department, Cervello Hospital, Palermo, Italy); Piera Costanzo and Monica Anselmino (Cardiology Department, Giovanni Bosco Hospital, Torino, Italy); Alfredo Zuppiroli and Irene Betti (Cardiology Department, Azienda Sanitaria di Firenze, Firenze, Italy); Gianluigi Bergandi and Giuliana Ronzani (Cardiology Department, Ivrea Hospital, Ivrea, Italy); Flavio Bologna (Cardiology Department, Rimini Hospital, Rimini, Italy); Nino Ciampani and Anna Patrignani (Cardiology Department, Senigallia Hospital, Senigallia, Italy).

Author Contributions

E.C. was responsible for the organization and coordination of the study; E.C., F.G.D.R., G.C. and A.C. (Anna Castiglione) were the chief investigators and responsible for the data analysis; G.C. and A.C. (Anna Castiglione) developed the study design. All authors contributed to the writing of the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical Committee of Maria Vittoria Hospital (Turin) approved first the registry in 2006. Subsequently, data acquisition and analyses were performed in compliance with protocols approved by the Ethical Committees of all the participant centers.The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent to publish this paper has been obtained from the patients.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Li J.S., Sexton D.J., Mick N., Nettles R., Fowler V.G., Jr., Ryan T., Bashore T., Corey G.R. Proposed Modifications to the Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000;30:633–638. doi: 10.1086/313753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cecchi E., Chirillo F., Castiglione A., Faggiano P., Cecconi M., Moreo A., Cialfi A., Rinaldi M., Del Ponte S., Squeri A., et al. Clinical epidemiology in Italian Registry of Infective Endocarditis (RIEI): Focus on age, intravascular devices and enterococci. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015;190:151–156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wurcel A.G., Anderson J.E., Chui K.K.H., Skinner S., Knox T.A., Snydman D., Stopka T.J. Increasing Infectious Endocarditis Admissions Among Young People Who Inject Drugs. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2016;3:ofw157. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Habib G., Lancellotti P., Antunes M.J., Bongiorni M.G., Casalta J.P., Del Zotti F., Dulgheru R., El Khoury G., Erba P.A., Iung B., et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis. The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:3075–3128. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Alkhawam H., Sogomonian R., Zaiem F., Vyas N., El-Hunjul M., Jolly J., Al-Khazraji A., Ashraf A. Morbidity and mortality of infective endocarditis in a hospital system in New York City serving a diverse urban population. J. Investig. Med. 2016;64:1118–1123. doi: 10.1136/jim-2015-000040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ortiz-Bautista C., López J., García-Granja P.E., Sevilla T., Vilacosta I., Sarriá C., Olmos C., Ferrera C., Sáez C., Gómez I., et al. Current profile of infective endocarditis in intravenous drug users: The prognostic relevance of the valves involved. Int. J. Cardiol. 2015;187:472–474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Asgeirsson H., Thalme A., Weiland O. Low mortality but increasing incidence of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in people who inject drugs: Experience from a Swedish referral hospital. Medicine. 2016;95:e5617. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cecchi E., Forno D., Imazio M., Migliardi A., Gnavi R., Conte I.D., Trinchero R. New trends in the epidemiological and clinical features of infective endocarditis: Results of a multicenter prospective study. Ital. Heart J. 2004;5:249–256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Davido B., Moussiegt A., Dinh A., Senard O., Deconinck L., Auzel O., Repesse X., Sirol M., Morgan M., Salomon J. Contribution of echocardiography in the diagnosis of definitive infective endocarditis: The infectious disease specialist’s point of view. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017;36:2329–2334. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3064-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Østerdal O.B., Salminen P.R., Jordal S., Sjursen H., Wendelbo Ø., Haaverstad R. Cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis in patients with intravenous drug use. Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 2016;22:633–640. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miró J.M., Moreno A., Mestres C.A. Infective Endocarditis in Intravenous Drug Abusers. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2003;5:307–316. doi: 10.1007/s11908-003-0007-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cicalini S., Forcina G., De Rosa F. Infective Endocarditis in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. J. Infect. 2001;42:267–271. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2001.0812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES