Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2022 Apr 27;61(25):e202203114. doi: 10.1002/anie.202203114

Discrete, Cationic Palladium(II)‐Oxo Clusters via f‐Metal Ion Incorporation and their Macrocyclic Host‐Guest Interactions with Sulfonatocalixarenes

Saurav Bhattacharya 1, Andrea Barba‐Bon 1, Tsedenia A Zewdie 1, Anja B Müller 1, Talha Nisar 2, Anna Chmielnicka 3, Iwona A Rutkowska 3, Christian J Schürmann 4, Veit Wagner 2, Nikolai Kuhnert 1, Pawel J Kulesza 3, Werner M Nau 1, Ulrich Kortz 1,
PMCID: PMC9324968  PMID: 35384204

Abstract

We report on the discovery of the first two examples of cationic palladium(II)‐oxo clusters (POCs) containing f‐metal ions, [PdII 6O12M8{(CH3)2AsO2}16(H2O)8]4+ (M=CeIV, ThIV), and their physicochemical characterization in the solid state, in solution and in the gas phase. The molecular structure of the two novel POCs comprises an octahedral {Pd6O12}12− core that is capped by eight MIV ions, resulting in a cationic, cubic assembly {Pd6O12MIV 8}20+, which is coordinated by a total of 16 terminal dimethylarsinate and eight water ligands, resulting in the mixed PdII‐CeIV/ThIV oxo‐clusters [PdII 6O12M8{(CH3)2AsO2}16(H2O)8]4+ (M=Ce, Pd6Ce8 ; Th, Pd6Th8 ). We have also studied the formation of host‐guest inclusion complexes of Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 with anionic 4‐sulfocalix[n]arenes (n=4, 6, 8), resulting in the first examples of discrete, enthalpically‐driven supramolecular assemblies between large metal‐oxo clusters and calixarene‐based macrocycles. The POCs were also found to be useful as pre‐catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2‐reduction and HCOOH‐oxidation.

Keywords: Calixarene, Cerium, Host-Guest Complexes, Palladium, Palladium-Oxo Clusters


The first cationic palladium(II)‐oxo clusters (POCs) containing f‐metal ions, [PdII 6O12M8{(CH3)2AsO2}16(H2O)8]4+ (M=CeIV, ThIV), have been structurally characterized and utilized as electrocatalysts. These POCs exhibit host‐guest interactions with 4‐sulfocalix[n]arenes (n=4, 6, 8), resulting in the first examples of discrete, enthalpically‐driven supramolecular assemblies between calixarene‐based macrocycles and large metal‐oxo clusters.

graphic file with name ANIE-61-0-g001.jpg

Introduction

Metal‐oxo clusters, which can be considered to be a subset of coordination cage complexes, are constructed by linking metal ions with oxygen‐based ligands, such as oxo, hydroxo or aqua. This leads to discrete molecular units that possess well‐defined structures and formulae. By subtle variation of the reaction medium pH, temperature, metal ion type and concentration, ionic strength, redox environment, and the terminating capping groups, it is possible to control the extent of hydrolysis and condensation, and hence the shape, size and composition of the resulting metal‐oxo clusters. [1] Several transition metal‐ and lanthanide‐oxo/hydroxo clusters have been discovered till date, [2] which have shown immense potential in the areas of photocatalytic water oxidation, [3] single‐molecular magnetism and cryogenic magnetic cooling devices, [4] as well as band‐gap tuning. [5] Furthermore, by utilizing suitable inorganic and/or organic linkers, these metal‐oxo clusters can be supramolecularly organized in three dimensions leading to inorganic or metal‐organic open‐framework materials, [6] which have found use in the areas of organocatalysis, electro‐ or photocatalysis as well as gas‐separation and storage. [6]

One of the most widely studied subclasses of metal‐oxo clusters are the anionic polyoxometalates (POMs), which are constructed from early transition metal ions in high oxidation states, such as MoVI, WVI, VV, NbV, and TaV with oxo‐linkers, resulting in a large class of compounds with an enormous variety of shapes, sizes and compositions. [7] The high thermal, electrochemical, and photochemical stability of POMs renders them immensely useful in the areas of magnetism, molecular electronics and catalysis. [8] The quest for the realization of purely noble‐metal‐based oxo‐clusters that could potentially be utilized as structural models to better understand noble‐metal‐based catalysis got its first impetus when, in 2004, the first polyoxoplatinate(III), [PtIII 12O8(SO4)12]4−, was discovered.[ 9 , 10a ] This was followed, in 2008 and 2010, by the discovery of the first polyoxopalladate(II) (POP), [PdII 13As8O34(OH)6]8−, [10b] and the first polyoxoaurate(III), [AuIII 4As4O20]8−, [10c] which paved the way for a multitude of other composition, size, and shape‐modulated noble‐metal ion‐based oxo‐clusters.[ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] Most of the reported noble‐metal ion‐based oxo‐clusters are anionic, with very few examples of neutral or cationic clusters none of which, hitherto, were based on palladium. [14] Very recently, the first discrete and neutral palladium‐based oxo‐clusters were reported, the disk‐shaped [Pd16O8(OH)8((CH3)2AsO2)8] (Pd16 ) and its chloro‐derivative [Pd16Na2O10(OH)3Cl3((CH3)2AsO2)8] (Pd16Cl), the doubly‐capped disk [Pd24O12(OH)8((CH3)2AsO2)16] (Pd24 ), and [Pd40O24(OH)16{(CH3)2AsO2}16] (Pd40 ), which is the largest neutral Pd‐oxo cluster isolated till date. [15] Herein, we report on the synthesis and structural characterization (solid‐state, solution and gaseous‐state) of the first two discrete and cationic palladium‐oxo clusters (POCs), and their host‐guest inclusion complex formation with anionic macrocyclic hosts 4‐sulfocalix[n]arenes (n=4,6, and 8).

Results and Discussion

The novel cationic, mixed PdII‐CeIV/ThIV oxo‐clusters [PdII 6O12M8{(CH3)2AsO2}16(H2O)8]4+ (M=Ce, Pd6Ce8 ; Th, Pd6Th8 ) were synthesized by heating mixtures of PdCl2 and CeCl3 for Pd6Ce8 or Th(NO3)4 for Pd6Th8 in a pH 7 sodium dimethylarsinate (also known as cacodylate) buffer solution at 80 °C for 1 hour, followed by pH adjustment to ≈7 using aq. NaOH solution, and stirring further at 80 °C for 1.5 hours, before filtering and crystallizing (detailed synthetic procedures are given in the Supporting Information). A point to note is that upon addition of γ‐cyclodextrin (γ‐CD) to the initial reaction mixtures, the reaction proceeded with lesser precipitation, and we obtained a higher yield in both cases. A similar observation was reported recently, wherein the CDs were shown to act as effective co‐modulators in the synthesis of the zirconium‐oxo cluster‐based MOF (UiO‐66‐NH2) by facilitating the proper dispersion of the reactants in the aqueous medium by strongly interacting with the hydrophobic organic linkers as well as the metal ions, thereby expediting the coordination of the organic linkers to the metal ions (see Supporting Information). [16]

Single‐crystal XRD studies [17] revealed that both Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 crystallize in the orthorhombic space group Pmmn (Table S1), and their asymmetric units consist of two CeIV and ThIV ions, respectively, along with four PdII ions. Therefore, the molecular clusters are composed of six square‐planar coordinated PdII ions, and eight distorted square‐antiprismatic coordinated CeIV and ThIV ions, respectively, which are connected to each other via 12 μ4‐oxo groups (O1, O2, O3, O4 and O5, see Figure 1). The square‐planar coordination environment of the PdII ions is formed exclusively by the μ4‐oxo groups (Pd−O distances in the range of 2.009(5)–2.038(6) Å for Pd6Ce8 and in the range of 2.019(8)–2.062(9) Å for Pd6Th8 ), whereas the distorted square‐antiprismatic coordination environment around the CeIV and ThIV ions is formed by three μ4‐oxo groups, four cacodylate oxygens, and a terminal aqua ligand (Ce−O distances in the range of 2.249(5)–2.664(6) Å and Th−O distances in the range of 2.340(7)–2.674(7) Å, see Tables S2 and S3). Additionally, the molecular structures can be visualized as comprising an octahedral {Pd6O12}12− core that is capped by eight MIV ions resulting in a cationic, cubic assembly {Pd6O12MIV 8}20+, which is coordinated by a total of 16 terminal dimethylarsinate and eight water ligands, resulting in the cationic, mixed PdII‐CeIV/ThIV oxo‐clusters [PdII 6O12M8{(CH3)2AsO2}16(H2O)8]4+ (M=Ce, Pd6Ce8 ; Th, Pd6Th8 ), see Figure S1. Therefore, Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 can be considered as discrete molecular equivalents of nanostructured Pd@ceria or Pd@thoria, [18] with the extended three‐dimensional structure having been arrested by the cacodylate capping moieties. The structures of CeO2 and ThO2 (Figure S2) consist of a face‐centered‐cubic (fcc) arrangement of the CeIV and ThIV ions, respectively, with all eight tetrahedral holes being filled by oxo anions. [19] In comparison, the discrete molecular structure of Pd6M8 also possesses a fcc arrangement of metal ions, the difference being that here the corners of the cube are occupied by CeIV or ThIV ions, whereas the face‐centers are occupied by PdII ions (Figures 1 and S1). After searching the literature, it became apparent that CeIV‐ and ThIV‐based oxo‐clusters, including cationic species, hade been reported before.[ 6d , 20 ] However, Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 are the first palladium‐based oxo‐clusters of cerium and thorium ever reported. In the solid‐state lattice, the cationic Pd6M8 clusters are held together by strong H‐bond interactions between the water molecules coordinated to the MIV ions and the lattice water molecules and chloride ions (Tables S4 and S5).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Structural representation of the cationic Pd6M8 oxo‐cluster (M=CeIV or ThIV). Color code: Pd blue, MIV orange, O red, C grey, (CH3)2AsO2 cyan tetrahedra.

Powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) studies on Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 indicated that the compounds were crystalline and pure as evidenced from the fact that the PXRD spectra of freshly prepared samples matched well with the simulated PXRD spectra (calculated from the SC‐XRD data, see Figure S3). The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of freshly‐prepared Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 between room temperature and 100 °C indicated weight losses of ≈16.3 % and ≈13 %, respectively, which corresponds to the loss of the lattice water molecules (calculated ≈16 % for Pd6Ce8 and ≈14 % for Pd6Th8 , respectively), see Figure S4. The infrared (FT‐IR) spectra of Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 indicated the presence of the characteristic bond‐stretches corresponding to Pd−O, Ce/Th−O, As−C and C−H (cacodylate moieties) as well as O−H (of H2O) bonds (see detailed analysis in the Supporting Information, Figure S5). The presence of a nitrate as a counter‐anion in Pd6Th8 and its absence in Pd6Ce8 was also confirmed by IR spectroscopy. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on both Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 in order to ascertain the oxidation states of Pd, Ce and Th. Both Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 exhibited a Pd 3d5/2 band at ≈337 eV, which is typical for Pd in a 2+ oxidation state (Figure S6a). [21] The XPS spectra of CeCl3 and (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6 as references for CeIII and CeIV‐containing compounds are given in Figure S6b, which exhibit the characteristic multiplet‐peaks corresponding to the spin‐orbit split 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 core holes in the region 880–910 eV. [21d] In addition, the satellite peak at ≈916.5 eV observed for (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6 is characteristic of the presence of CeIV. This peak was also observed in the XPS spectrum of Pd6Ce8 at ≈916.4 eV, indicating that Ce is in the 4+ oxidation state (Figure S6b). The XPS spectrum of Pd6Th8 exhibited the characteristic 4f7/2 and 4f5/2 peaks at ≈344.5 and ≈335.6 eV, respectively, which match well with the XPS spectrum of the Th(NO3)4 reference (Figure S6a). [21e] These observations were also corroborated by bond valence sum (BVS) calculations on Ce in Pd6Ce8 and Th in Pd6Th8 , which indicated unequivocally that Ce and Th are in the 4+ oxidation state (Tables S6 and S7).

The cationic Pd6M8 oxo‐clusters possess idealized C 2v point group symmetry with the C2 principal axis of rotation passing through the PdII ions Pd1 and Pd3, and the two σv planes containing the PdII ions Pd1, Pd2, and Pd3, as well as Pd1, Pd3, and Pd4, respectively. Consequently, the discrete Pd6M8 oxo‐cluster has seven types of structurally inequivalent cacodylate moieties, two each of As1, As2, As3, As5, As6 and As7, and four of As4. This should lead to seven signals in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra of aqueous solutions of the Pd6M8 oxo‐clusters with expected integration ratios of 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 : 2. However, the 1H NMR (D2O) spectra of both Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 (Figure 2) exhibit five signals, originating from the methyl hydrogens of the cacodylate groups with chemical shift values of 1.48, 1.68, 1.73, 2.07 and 2.93 ppm for Pd6Ce8 , and 1.46, 1.63, 1.67, 1.94 and 2.78 ppm for Pd6Th8 , with the integration ratios for both being 1 : 2 : 3 : 1 : 1. It seems that the seemingly inequivalent cacodylates As2, As3 and As5 actually appear as one large peak in the 1H NMR spectra (Figure S1), most likely because the molecular motion in solution renders them equivalent. The 1H NMR spectrum of Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 remained unchanged even after a week, which indicates the high solution stability of the two species (Figure S7). In 13C NMR also five signals were observed with chemical shift values of 17.69, 17.86, 18.27, 19.70 and 24.14 ppm for Pd6Ce8 , and 17.69, 17.86, 18.08, 19.30 and 22.76 ppm for Pd6Th8 (Figure S8).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Solution 1H NMR spectra of Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 in D2O, inset figure shows the structurally inequivalent cacodylate groups on the cationic oxo‐clusters. See text for more details.

ESI‐mass spectra of Pd6Th8 were acquired from aqueous solutions in both positive and negative ion mode. In the negative ion mode, no signals corresponding to the compound were observed. However, in the positive ion mode, two groups of signals centered around m/z 1219 and 1637 were observed (Figure S9a). As a starting point for spectra assignment, we assumed the presence of the core structure [PdII 6O12Th8{(CH3)2AsO2}16(H2O)8]4+ (Pd6Th8 ) as established by XRD, and the observed isotope pattern is in full agreement with this structure. The signal centered around m/z 1219 can be assigned to a quadruply‐charged species based on the spacing of the isotope peaks. Assuming the absence of the coordinated waters, we observe that the quadruply‐charged species [PdII 6O12Th8{(CH3)2AsO2}16]4+ is transferred intact into the gas phase (Figure S9b). The simulated mass spectrum is in good agreement with the experimentally observed spectrum. The signal centered at around m/z 1637 can be assigned to a triply‐ charged ion accompanied by a chloride anion, reducing the charge of the oxo‐cluster from 4+ to 3+ (Figure S9c). For the structural analogue Pd6Ce8 , again no signals were observed in the negative ion mode. However, two signals were observed in the positive ion mode centered at m/z 2106 and 1381 with isotope patterns expected for the structure (Figure S10a). Following spectral simulations, we assign these signals to a doubly‐charged species, [Pd6O12Ce8{(CH3)2AsO2}16Cl2]2+ (Figure S10b), and to a triply‐charged species, [Pd6O12{CeIIICeIV 7}{(CH3)2AsO2}16]3+ (Figure S10c), where we observe a partial reduction of the CeIV to CeIII under the ESI‐MS conditions. Similar observations have been reported before in the positive ion mode of the ESI‐MS spectra of metal complexes. [22]

The formation of host‐guest inclusion complexes between inorganic oxo‐clusters and organic macrocycles has gained attention only recently, with a focus on the interaction of the clusters with cyclodextrin (CD) macrocycles. [23] Following the initial observation of complex formation between CDs and the Keggin‐type POM [PMo12O40]3−, different organic‐inorganic (CD/POM) systems comprising Wells‐Dawson, [24] Keggin, [25] and Lindqvist[ 25b , 26 ]—type POMs have been reported. Examples of CD complex formation with cationic metal clusters as guests are also known.[ 24b , 27 ] The superchaotropic nature of the POM anions [28] has been held responsible for their surprisingly strong affinity towards hydrophobic cavities, and the generic driving force has been described as the chaotropic effect, which complements the hydrophobic effect as a new assembly motif in supramolecular chemistry. [29]

This led us to hypothesize that the newly‐synthesized cationic mixed‐metal oxo‐clusters Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 could likewise form supramolecular complexes with organic macrocycles. However, the sizes of the cavities of the CDs (α, β, and γ) span from 6–10 Å, [23b] whereas the size of the Pd6M8 clusters is in the order of ≈15 Å, which excludes the idea of inclusion complexation between the oxo‐clusters and the CDs. Indeed, no experimental evidence for interactions between Pd6M8 and CDs was observed. Calixarenes, which are macrocycles containing phenolic moieties linked by methylene bridges at positions 2 and 6 (Figure 3a), play an equally important role in the field of supramolecular chemistry and associated applications. [30] Compared to other macrocyclic hosts, calixarenes do not have a fixed conformation, hence allowing them to also interact with larger guest molecules. Calixarenes display adaptable binding with a preference for inclusion of globular guests. [31] Therefore, we envisaged that calixarenes could be excellent candidates for the formation of supramolecular complexes with the cationic Pd6M8 clusters. As these clusters are positively charged, anionic sulfonatocalixarenes (CXn, n=4, 6, 8) were expected to interact most strongly, and they were accordingly tested as alternative macrocycles to CDs. CXn also have a preference for the desirable conical conformation and all sulfonato groups are ionized near neutral pH. [32]

Figure 3.

Figure 3

a) Chemical structure of the anionic sulfonatocalixarenes. b) 1H‐NMR spectra of CX4 (2 mM) in the presence of increasing Pd6Th8 concentrations. c) Changes in the LCG emission spectra (λ ex=369 nm), in LCG⋅CX4 (0.5 μM and 1 μM respectively), upon addition of increasing concentrations of Pd6Th8 (0–555 μM). d) Plot of the maximal fluorescence intensity (from panel c) versus Pd6Th8 concentration, and the corresponding “1host : 1guest : 1competitor” stoichiometric curve fit; the inset shows the competitive fluorescent indicator principle, where the initial LCG fluorescence is quenched in its CX4 complex (left) and recovered by displacement by the competitive binder (right). e) Microcalorimetric titration of Pd6Th8 by CX4; raw ITC data (top) for sequential injections of CX4 into the Pd6Th8 solution, and apparent reaction heats obtained from the integration of the calorimetric traces with associated fitting to a 1 : 1 complexation model (bottom). f) SC‐XRD structure of the Pd6Th8 CX4 complex. Color code is same as Figure 1 except that sulfurs are represented as light yellow balls.

The complexation of Pd6Th8 with CX4 was evaluated first by a 1H‐NMR titration experiment by adding increasing concentrations of Pd6Th8 to a 2 mM CX4 solution in D2O (Figure 3b). The 1H‐NMR peaks of free CX4 are sharp due to a fast conformational cone interconversion, and the bridging methylene protons (axial and equatorial) emerge as a singlet. Upon addition of Pd6Th8 , the methylene singlet peak splits into two broad proton peaks around 4.20 and 3.45 ppm, indicating that the CX4 cavity becomes locked into a cone conformation [33] upon complexation with Pd6Th8 , affording a partial inclusion complex. Surprisingly, the complexation of Pd6Ce8 by CX4 could not be studied by 1H‐NMR due to an interference by precipitation at the required mM concentrations.

The formation of the Pd6Th8 CX4 complex was further probed by fluorescence titrations by using an indicator displacement assay (IDA), [34] which has been applied in supramolecular chemistry to determine the association constants of optically transparent compounds. Lucigenin (LCG) has been introduced before as ideal fluorescent indicator for CX4; [35] its fluorescence is quenched inside the LCG⋅CX4 complex, such that the binding by a competitive guest can be followed through a fluorescence increase/recovery. The binding constant of the competitor can be quantified via a fitting of the competitive titration curve. Indeed, the addition of Pd6Th8 (competitive guest) to a quenched solution of LCG⋅CX4 resulted in an increase of the fluorescence intensity due to dye displacement from CX4 (Figures 3c and d). The binding constant was found to be (1.9±0.2)×105 M−1 by using a 1host:1guest:1competitor stoichiometric binding model, which pointed to a strong 1 : 1 complex formation. The Pd6Ce8 could not be investigated with this method, because the large intrinsic cluster absorbance prevented selective LCG excitation (Figure S11).

ITC titrations were additionally conducted with both the Pd6M8 clusters and three selected anionic calixarenes (CX4, CX6, and CX8) to investigate the thermodynamic fingerprint of the supramolecular interaction. The results are summarized in Table 1 (see Figures 3e and S12 for the ITC thermograms). In all cases, the process was enthalpically driven, consistent with the chaotropic effect as dominant driving force.[ 28 , 29 ] In contrast, when “simple” metal cations bind electrostatically to CXn, an entropically driven binding is observed. [36] The complex stoichiometry was consistent with a 1 : 1 complexation pattern (Pd6M8 CXn ), in line with the fluorescence displacement titrations with Pd6Th8 . Note that phenyl sulfonate, as a monomeric CXn model, afforded no heat effect in ITC titrations with Pd6M8 (Figure S13), which reveals the importance of the concave binding site of the calixarene moiety.

Table 1.

Association constants (K a) of cationic mixed‐oxo clusters with CXn and thermodynamic parameters for complex formation (kcal mol−1).[a]

Host

Guest

K a [×105 M−1]

ΔH°

TΔS°

ΔG°

CX4

Pd6Ce8

26

−7.3

1.4

−8.7

Pd6Th8

1.7

−7.8

−1.1

−6.7

CX6

Pd6Ce8

3.9

−5.9

1.7

−7.6

Pd6Th8

6.5

−8.5

−0.7

−7.8

CX8

Pd6Ce8

n.a.[b]

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Pd6Th8

9.7

−10.4

−2.3

−8.1

[a] 10 % Error for K a and ±0.5 kcal mol−1 for ΔH, TΔS and ΔG (SD, measured as duplicates). [b] n.a.=not available due to sample aggregation/precipitation.

The Pd6Th8 affinity (and the enthalpic driving force) for the anionic calixarenes increases with increasing CXn size (and flexibility) pointing to a size‐matching effect. In contrast, the entropic term is smaller and less diagnostic. The ITC experiments with Pd6Ce8 also provided clear evidence for a strong and enthalpy‐driven interaction, but aggregation/precipitation interfered again, in particular at higher concentrations and for CX8, evident through a jump or a bump in the titration curves, which prevented a size‐ or cluster‐dependent quantitative analysis.

Subsequently, we attempted to isolate single crystals of the Pd6M8 CXn complexes in order to obtain structural information in the solid‐state. In this regard, aqueous solutions of the CXn macrocycles (1 mL, 0.002 mmol) were added slowly to aqueous solutions of the Pd6M8 cations (1 mL, 0.002 mmol), and the mixtures were kept at room temperature in an open vial for crystallization. Single crystals suitable for SC‐XRD measurement were obtained for the Pd6Th8 CX4 complex after 7 days (Table S1, Figure 3f, Figure S14), whereas for the other systems, precipitation was observed during the same time period. The solid‐state structure revealed a Pd6Th8 CX4 [17] complex exhibiting the expected 1 : 1 complex stoichiometry and conical host conformation of the calixarenes, corroborating the observations in aqueous solution. Within the 1 : 1 complex, the Pd6Th8 interacts with the CX4 via strong H‐bonding interactions (Table S9, Figure S14) through the sulfonate oxygens (H‐bond acceptor) and the terminal water molecules coordinated to the Th4+ ions (H‐bond donor). Each Pd6Th8 CX4 complex further interacts with neighboring complexes in the solid‐state via weak H‐bonds and C−H⋅⋅⋅π interactions (Table S9, Table S10, Figure S14) to form the overall supramolecular arrangement. Thus, the SC‐XRD study confirmed the nature of the complex as a partial/superficial inclusion complex, and it revealed the proximate, electrostatically favorable positioning of the sulfonato groups towards the cationic oxo‐cluster. The host‐guest interaction between Pd6Th8 and CX4 has also been studied in the gas‐phase using ESI‐MS, which indicate the formation of a covalently‐linked calixarene complex in the gaseous state (details given in the Supporting Information).

The presence of the cacodylate caps and the ceria and thoria‐type components render the two cationic clusters Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 electrochemically inert, unless more negative potentials are applied. However, the PdII ions eventually undergo irreversible reduction during a voltammetric negative potential scan to form metallic palladium [37] (at −0.2 V, as demonstrated for Pd6Ce8 , Figure S16). The generated Pd0 sites are expected to behave similarly to Pt and induce redox transitions[ 38 , 39 ] of otherwise highly‐inert arsenic oxo species (Figure S17). The existence of reductively‐active hydrogen‐sorbed species on palladium [40] is of importance as well.

In general, the voltammetric characteristics of Pd6Th8 (Figure 4B) is similar to that of Pd6Ce8 (Figure 4A), except that for Pd6Th8 the reduction of PdII to Pd0 is operative at more positive potentials, as compared to Pd6Ce8 , and the generated Pd0 sites induce reduction of the As‐oxo groups within Pd6Th8 (the irreversible reduction peak at about 0.7 V in Figure 4B). Furthermore, due to the presence of interstitial Pd0 sites, both pre‐reduced Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 exhibit electrocatalytic activity toward CO2‐reduction[ 37 , 41 , 42 , 43 ] in the semi‐neutral medium of 0.1 mol dm−3 phosphate buffer of pH 6.1. Simply judging from the appearance of the well‐defined and sound CO2‐reduction peak at the less negative (than typically reported)[ 37 , 41 , 42 ] potential of −0.3 V (Figure 4C) for the pre‐reduced Pd6Ce8 , it can be considered as a potent electrocatalyst for the reduction of CO2. It is likely that the self‐poisoning (with CO) of Pd surfaces becomes less pronounced in such nanoengineered ceria‐encapulated Pd clusters. Based on chromatographic analysis performed as described earlier, [37] carbon monoxide and hydrogen (i.e. syngas components) are the main reaction products. The somewhat lower activity of Pd6Th8 could be due to the presence of sizeable amounts of the reduced arsenic species in the vicinity of Pd0 sites (see Supporting Information). Finally, the high electrocatalytic activity of Pd0 sites within Pd6Ce8 can also be seen during the voltammetric oxidation of formic acid. The appearance of a single peak at a potential as low as 0.23 V (Figure S18) is consistent with the direct‐oxidation‐to‐CO2 (simple dehydrogenation without the intermediate CO adsorbates) mechanism.[ 40 , 44 , 45 ] Similar to core‐shell Pd@CeO2 catalysts,[ 46 , 47 ] an intimate contact between the central Pd cluster and the surrounding ceria shell can be postulated here. Obviously, the electrogenerated Pd‐atomic species are well dispersed with respect to the ceria, and it has been reported before that Pd‐nanoparticles smaller than 10 nm induce electrooxidation of formic acid at small positive potentials (<0.3 V). [48]

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Cyclic voltammetric responses of pre‐reduced (i.e., recorded as the second voltammetric cycles after generation of metallic Pd) of a) Pd6Ce8 and b) Pd6Th8 (Electrolyte, 0.5 mol dm−3 H2SO4).Voltametric reduction (solid lines) of carbon dioxide (in CO2‐saturated 0.1 mol dm−3 phosphate buffer) at pre‐reduced c) Pd6Ce8 and d) Pd6Th8 . Dashed lines, which stand for the responses in the CO2‐free solutions, illustrate the Pd‐induced hydrogen evolution at potentials lower than −0.2 V. Scan rate, 10 mV s−1.

Conclusion

The use of non‐covalent interactions between POMs and various inorganic and organic host materials has recently gained ground as an effective strategy to gain access to molecular assemblies with immense applicability in the area of energy storage, magnetism, sensors, water treatment, and proton conduction. [8i] In addition, the encapsulation of POMs into non‐toxic bio‐compatible macrocyclic hosts, such as cyclodextrins, can increase the hydrolytic stability of POMs and decrease the inherent cellular toxicity, thereby rendering them useful in medicinal applications as well. [8i] Herein, we have isolated the first two cationic f‐block ion incorporated palladium(II)‐oxo clusters (POCs), [PdII 6O12M8{(CH3)2AsO2}16(H2O)8]4+ (M=CeIV, ThIV). To date, only anionic and neutral POCs have been reported in the literature and, therefore, the discovery of cationic POCs represents an important breakthrough in the area of noble‐metal‐oxo chemistry, especially since it allows the integration of noble‐metal ions with f‐block elements in metal‐oxo clusters. The novel compounds have been characterized thoroughly utilizing single‐crystal and powder XRD, TGA, IR, XPS, 1H and 13C solution‐state NMR and ESI‐MS. In addition, we have established here the first case of a discrete, enthalpically‐driven supramolecular interaction between large metal‐oxo clusters and calixarene macrocycles as based on combined solution, solid‐state, and gas‐phase studies (1H NMR, fluorescence displacement, ITC, SC‐XRD, and ESI‐MS). Further, studies on the electrocatalytic performance of Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 indicated unique enhancement effects toward the electroreduction of CO2 and electrooxidation of formic acid, which could be attributed to synergies between in situ generated Pd nanoparticles and surrounding ceria or thoria shells. This reaffirms our structural analogy that the two cationic complexes Pd6Ce8 and Pd6Th8 can be considered as discrete molecular equivalents of nanostructured Pd@ceria or Pd@thoria, respectively.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

1.

Supporting information

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

U.K. and W.M.N thank the German Research Council (DFG, KO‐2288/29‐1, KO‐2288/26‐1, NA 686/15‐1, and NA 686/8‐2) and Jacobs University for financial support. A.Ch., I.A.R., and P.J.K. thank the National Science Center (NCN, Poland) for financial support (Opus Project 2018/29/B/ST5/02627). We also thank Emily Schoeneich for help with the fluorescence measurements. The authors declare no competing financial interests. The metal‐oxo cluster structural figures were generated by Diamond, Version 3.2 (copyright Crystal Impact GbR). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Dedicated to Professor Michael T. Pope on the occasion of his 89th birthday

S. Bhattacharya, A. Barba-Bon, T. A. Zewdie, A. B. Müller, T. Nisar, A. Chmielnicka, I. A. Rutkowska, C. J. Schürmann, V. Wagner, N. Kuhnert, P. J. Kulesza, W. M. Nau, U. Kortz, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202203114; Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202203114.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. 
  • 1a. Baes C. F., Mesmer R. E., The Hydrolysis of Cations, Krieger, 1986; [Google Scholar]
  • 1b. Wagner A. T., Roesky P. W., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 782–791. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. 
  • 2a. Yang G.-Y., Huang D.-G. in Modern Inorganic Synthetic Chemistry , 2nd ed., Elsevier, 2017, chap. 9; [Google Scholar]
  • 2b. Gross S., J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 15853–15861; [Google Scholar]
  • 2c. Schubert U., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 350, 61–67; [Google Scholar]
  • 2d. Gao S., Molecular Nanomagnets and Related Phenomena, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. 
  • 3a. Chen R., Yan Z.-H., Kong X.-J., ChemPhotoChem 2020, 4, 157–167; [Google Scholar]
  • 3b. Han Q., Ding Y., Dalton Trans. 2018, 47, 8180–8188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. 
  • 4a. Woodruff D. N., Winpenny R. E. P., Layfield R. A., Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5110–5148; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4b. Zheng Z., Recent Development in Clusters of Rare Earths and Actinides: Chemistry and Materials, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Fang W.-H., Zhang L., Zhang J., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 404–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. 
  • 6a. Cao R., Advanced Structural Chemistry: Tailoring Properties of Inorganic Materials and their Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2021; [Google Scholar]
  • 6b. Lin Z.-E., Yang G.-Y., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 3857–3867; [Google Scholar]
  • 6c. Lin Z.-E., Yang G.-Y., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2895–2902; [Google Scholar]
  • 6d. Falaise C., Kozma K., Nyman M., Chem. Eur. J. 2018, 24, 14226–14232; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6e. Li Z., Lin L.-D., Yu H., Li X.-X., Zheng S.-T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 15777–15781; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 16003–16007; [Google Scholar]
  • 6f. Liu J.-H., Lin L.-D., Wang G.-Q., Li L.-Y., Sun Y.-Q., Li X.-X., Zheng S.-T., Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 10305–10308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. 
  • 7a. Pope M., Jeannin Y., Fournier M., Heteropoly and Isopoly Oxometalates, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, 1983; [Google Scholar]
  • 7b. Pope M. T., Müller A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 34–48; [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 56–70; [Google Scholar]
  • 7c. Amiri M., Martin N. P., Feng C.-L., Lovio J. K., Nyman M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 12461–12466; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 12569–12574; [Google Scholar]
  • 7d. Zhu Z.-K., Lin Y.-Y., Yu H., Li X.-X., Zheng S.-T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 16864–16868; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 17020–17024. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. 
  • 8a. Kortz U., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 34; [Google Scholar]
  • 8b. Dolbecq A., Dumas E., Mayer C. R., Mialane P., Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 6009–6048; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8c. Mizuno N., Kamata K., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 2358–2370; [Google Scholar]
  • 8d. Coronado E., Giménez-Saiz C., Gómez-García C. J., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 1776–1796; [Google Scholar]
  • 8e. Pope M. T., Müller A., Polyoxometalates: From Platonic Solids to Anti-Retroviral Activity, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2012; [Google Scholar]
  • 8f. Kortz U., Müller A., van Slageren J., Schnack J., Dalal N. S., Dressel M., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 2315–2327; [Google Scholar]
  • 8g. Long D.-L., Burkholder E., Cronin L., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 105–121; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8h. Müller A., Gouzerh P., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 7431–7463; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8i. Stuckart M., Monakhov K. Y., Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 4364–4376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. 
  • 9a. Döbereiner J. W., J. Chem. Phys. 1828, 54, 412–426; [Google Scholar]
  • 9b. Goloboy J. C., Klemperer W. G., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 3562–3564; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 3614–3616. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. 
  • 10a. Pley M., Wickleder M. S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 4168–4170; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 4262–4264; [Google Scholar]
  • 10b. Chubarova E. V., Dickman M. H., Keita B., Nadjo L., Miserque F., Mifsud M., Arends I. W. C. E., Kortz U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9542–9546; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 9685–9689; [Google Scholar]
  • 10c. Izarova N. V., Vankova N., Heine T., Ngo Biboum R., Keita B., Nadjo L., Kortz U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1886–1889; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 1930–1933; [Google Scholar]
  • 10d. Yang P., Kortz U., Acc. Chem. Res. 2018, 51, 1599–1608; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10e. Izarova N. V., Vankova N., Banerjee A., Jameson G. B., Heine T., Schinle F., Hampe O., Kortz U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7807–7811; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 7975–7980; [Google Scholar]
  • 10f. Xu F., Miras H. N., Scullion R. A., Long D.-L., Thiel J., Cronin L., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 11609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Izarova N. V., Ngo Biboum R., Keita B., Mifsud M., Arends I. W. C. E., Jameson G. B., Kortz U., Dalton Trans. 2009, 9385–9387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Xiang Y., Izarova N. V., Schinle F., Hampe O., Keita B., Kortz U., Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 9849–9851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yang P., Xiang Y., Lin Z., Lang Z., Jiménez-Lozano P., Carbó J. J., Poblet J. M., Fan L., Hu C., Kortz U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 15766–15770; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 15998–16002. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. 
  • 14a. Wang Z., Yang F.-L., Yang Y., Liu Q.-Y., Sun D., Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 10296–10299; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14b. Yang Y., Jia T., Han Y.-Z., Nan Z.-A., Yuan S.-F., Yang F.-L., Sun D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 12280–12285; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 12408–12413; [Google Scholar]
  • 14c. Pei X.-L., Yang Y., Lei Z., Chang S.-S., Guan Z.-J., Wan X.-K., Wen T.-B., Wang Q.-M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 5520–5525; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14d. Wong E. L.-M., Sun R. W.-Y., Chung N. P. Y., Lin C.-L. S., Zhu N., Che C.-M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4938–4939; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14e. Chen S., Fang W.-H., Zhang L., Zhang J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 11252–11256; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 11422–11426; [Google Scholar]
  • 14f. Toma H. E., Araki K., Alexiou A. D. P., Nikolaou S., Dovidauskas S., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 219–221, 187–234; [Google Scholar]
  • 14g. Houston J. R., Olmstead M. M., Casey W. H., Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 7799–7805; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14h. Ibrahim M., Dickman M. H., Suchopar A., Kortz U., Inorg. Chem. 2009, 48, 1649–1654; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14i. Upadhyay A., Rajpurohit J., Kumar-Singh M., Dubey R., Kumar Srivastava A., Kumar A., Rajaraman G., Shanmugam M., Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 6061–6070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. 
  • 15a. Bhattacharya S., Basu U., Haouas M., Su P., Espenship M. F., Wang F., Solé-Daura A., Taffa D. H., Wark M., Poblet J. M., Laskin J., Cadot E., Kort U., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 3632–3639; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 3676–3683; [Google Scholar]
  • 15b. Bhattacharya S., Ma X., Mougharbel A. S., Haouas M., Su P., Espenship M. F., Taffa D. H., Jaensch H., Bons A.-J., Stuerzer T., Wark M., Laskin J., Cadot E., Kortz U., Inorg. Chem. 2021, 60, 17339–17347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. 
  • 16a. Hoyez G., Rousseau J., Rousseau C., Saitzek S., King J., Szilágyi P. Á., Volkringer C., Loiseau T., Hapiot F., Monflier E., Ponchel A., CrystEngComm 2021, 23, 2764; [Google Scholar]
  • 16b. Barr L., Dumanski P. G., Easton C. J., Harper J. B., Lee K., Lincoln S. F., Meyer A. G., Simpson J. S., J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2004, 50, 19–24; [Google Scholar]
  • 16c. Song L. X., Bai L., Xu X. M., He J., Pan S. Z., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2009, 253, 1276–1284. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deposition Numbers 2117327 (for Pd 6 Ce 8 ), 2117328 (for Pd 6 Th 8 ), and 2117329 (for Pd 6 Th 8 CX4) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachinformationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service.
  • 18. 
  • 18a. Chen G., Rosei F., Ma D., Nanoscale 2015, 7, 5578; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18b. Zhang S., Chen C., Cargnello M., Fornasiero P., Gorte R. J., Graham G. W., Pan X., Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7778; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18c. Ye J., Cheng D.-G., Chen F., Zhan X., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 21972–21982; [Google Scholar]
  • 18d. Yeung C. M. Y., Tsang S. C., J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 6074–6087. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. 
  • 19a. Tang W.-X., Gao P.-X., MRS Commun. 2016, 6, 311–329; [Google Scholar]
  • 19b. Melchionna M., Fornasiero P., Mater. Today 2014, 17, 349; [Google Scholar]
  • 19c. Behera R. K., Deo C. S., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2012, 24, 215405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. 
  • 20a. Estes S. L., Antonio M. R., Soderholm L., J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 5810–5818; [Google Scholar]
  • 20b. Mitchell K. J., Abboud K. A., Christou G., Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1445; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20c. Wasson M. C., Zhang X., Otake K.-ichi., Rosen A. S., Alayoglu S., Krzyaniak M. D., Chen Z., Redfern L. R., Robison L., Son F. A., Chen Y., Islamoglu T., Notestein J. M., Snurr R. Q., Wasielewski M. R., Farha O. K., Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 8522–8529; [Google Scholar]
  • 20d. Colliard A., Nyman M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 7308–7315; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 7384–7391; [Google Scholar]
  • 20e. Malaestean I. L., Ellern A., Baca S., Kögerler P., Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1499–1501; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20f. Knope K. E., Wilson R. E., Vasiliu M., Dixon D. A., Soderholm L., Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 9696–9704; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20g. Knope K. E., Vasiliu M., Dixon D. A., Soderholm L., Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 4239–4249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. 
  • 21a. Moulder J. F., Stickle W. F., Sobol P. E., Bomben K. D., Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (Ed.: Chastain J.), Perkin-Elmer Corp., Eden Prairie, 1992; [Google Scholar]
  • 21b.“Ag Foil by XPS”: Hoflund G. B., Weaver J. F., Epling W. S., Surf. Sci. Spectra 1994, 3, 151–156; [Google Scholar]
  • 21c. Teterin Y. A., Teterin A. Y., Lebedev A. M., Utkin I. O., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1998, 88–91, 275–279; [Google Scholar]
  • 21d. Bêche E., Charvin P., Perarnau D., Abanades S., Flamant G., Surf. Interface Anal. 2008, 40, 264–267; [Google Scholar]
  • 21e. Dash S., Singh A., Ajikumar P. K., Subramanian H., Rajalakshmi M., Tyagi A. K., Arora A. K., Narasimhan S. V., Raj B., J. Nucl. Mater. 2002, 303, 156–168. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. 
  • 22a. Gianelli L., Amendola V., Fabbrizzi L., Pallavicini P., Mellerio G. G., Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 15, 2347–2353; [Google Scholar]
  • 22b. Lavanant H., Virelizier H., Hoppilliard Y., J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 1217–1221; [Google Scholar]
  • 22c. Waska H., Koschinsky A., Dittmar T., Front. Mar. Sci. 2016, 3, 119. [Google Scholar]
  • 23. 
  • 23a. Wu Y., Shi R., Wu Y.-L., Holcroft J. M., Liu Z., Frasconi M., Wasielewski M. R., Li H., Stoddart J. F., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 4111–4118; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23b. Szejtli J., Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1743–1753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. 
  • 24a. Moussawi M. A., Haouas M., Floquet S., Shepard W. E., Abramov P. A., Sokolov M. N., Fedin V. P., Cordier S., Ponchel A., Monflier E., Marrot J., Cadot E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 14376–14379; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24b. Moussawi M. A., Leclerc-Laronze N., Floquet S., Abramov P. A., Sokolov M. N., Cordier S., Ponchel A., Monflier E., Bricout H., Landy D., Haouas M., Marrot J., Cadot E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 12793–12803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. 
  • 25a. Yao S., Falaise C., Ivanov A. A., Leclerc N., Hohenschutz M., Haouas M., Landy D., Shestopalov M. A., Bauduin P., Cadot E., Inorg. Chem. Front. 2021, 8, 12–25; [Google Scholar]
  • 25b. Su P., Smith A. J., Warneke J., Laskin J., J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 30, 1934–1945; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25c. Fan Y., Lu S., Cao J., Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 435, 163–167; [Google Scholar]
  • 25d. Ni L., Li H., Xu H., Shen C., Liu R., Xie J., Zhang F., Chen C., Zhao H., Zuo T., Diao G., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 38708–38718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Falaise C., Moussawi M. A., Floquet S., Abramov P. A., Sokolov M. N., Haouas M., Cadot E., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 11198–11201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Ivanov A. A., Pozmogova T. N., Solovieva A. O., Frolova T. S., Sinitsyna O. I., Lundovskaya O. V., Tsygankova A. R., Haouas M., Landy D., Benassi E., Shestopalova L. V., Falaise C., Cadot E., Shestopalov M. A., Abramov P. A., Sokolov M. N., Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26, 7479–7485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. 
  • 28a. Naskar B., Diat O., Nardello-Rataj V., Bauduin P., J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 20985–20992; [Google Scholar]
  • 28b. Assaf K. I., Ural M. S., Pan F., Georgiev T., Simova S., Rissanen K., Gabel D., Nau W. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 6852–6856; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 6956–6960. [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Assaf K. I., Nau W. M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 13968–13981; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 14164–14177. [Google Scholar]
  • 30. 
  • 30a. Pan Y.-C., Hu X.-Y., Guo D.-S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 2768–2794; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 2800–2828; [Google Scholar]
  • 30b. Kumar R., Sharma A., Singh H., Suating P., Kim H. S., Sunwoo K., Shim I., Gibb B. C., Kim J. S., Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 9657–9721; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30c. Español E. S., Villamil M. M., Biomol. Eng. 2019, 9, 90; [Google Scholar]
  • 30d. Kumar S., Chawla S., Zou M. C., J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2017, 88, 129–158; [Google Scholar]
  • 30e. Homden D. M., Redshaw C., Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 5086–5130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Bakirci H., Koner A. L., Nau W. M., J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 9960–9966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Bakirci H., Schwarzlose T., Koner A. L., Nau W. M., Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 4799–4807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Gutsche C. D., Bauer L. J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 6052–6059. [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Dsouza R. N., Pischel U., Nau W. M., Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 7941–7980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Guo D.-S., Uzunova V. D., Su X., Liu Y., Nau W. M., Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 1722–1734. [Google Scholar]
  • 36. 
  • 36a. Bakirci H., Koner A. L., Nau W. M., Chem. Commun. 2005, 5411–5413; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36b. Francisco V., Piñeiro A., Nau W. M., García-Río L., Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 17809–17820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wadas A., Gorczynski A., Rutkowska I. A., Seta-Wiaderek E., Szaniawska E., Kubicki M., Lewera A., Gorzkowski M., Januszewska A., Jurczakowski R., Palys B., Patroniak V., Kulesza P. J., Electrochim. Acta 2021, 388, 138550. [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Cox J. A., Rutkowska I. A., Kulesza P. J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 037565. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Postek W. B., Rutkowska I. A., Cox J. A., Kulesza P. J., Electrochim. Acta 2019, 319, 499–510. [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Rutkowska I. A., Marks D., Perruchot C., Jouini M., Kulesza P. J., Colloids Surf. A 2013, 439, 200–206. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Gao D., Zhou H., Cai F., Wang J., Wang G., Bao X., ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 1510–1519. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zhao Y., Tan X., Yang W., Jia C., Chen X., Ren W., Smith S. C., Zhao C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 21493–21498; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 21677–21682. [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Kulesza P. J., Rutkowska I. A., Electrochem. Soc. Interface 2020, 29, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Qu W.-L., Wang Z.-B., Sui X.-L., Gu D.-M., Yin G.-P., Fuel Cells 2013, 13, 149–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Rutkowska I. A., Aust. J. Chem. 2016, 69, 394–402. [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Cargnello M., Delgado Jaén J. J., Hernández Garrido J. C., Bakhmutsky K., Montini T., Calvino Gámez J. J., Gorte R. J., Fornasiero P., Science 2012, 337, 713–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Adijanto L., Bennett D. A., Chen C., Yu A. S., Cargnello M., Fornasiero P., Gorte R. J., Vohs J. M., Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 2252–2257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ju W., Valiollahi R., Ojani R., Schneider O., Stimming U., Electrocatalysis 2016, 7, 149–158. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Supporting Information

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Angewandte Chemie (International Ed. in English) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES