Abstract
Objectives
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which has a close relationship with type 2 diabetes (T2D), is related to salt intake in the general population. In contrast, the relationship between salt intake and the presence of NAFLD in patients with T2D has not been clarified.
Methods
Salt intake (g/day) was assessed using urinary sodium excretion, and a high salt intake was defined as an intake greater than the median amount of 9.5 g/day. Hepatic steatosis index (HSI) ≥ 36 points was used to diagnosed NAFLD. Odds ratios of high salt intake to the presence of NAFLD were evaluated by logistic regression analysis.
Results
The frequency of NAFLD was 36.5% in 310 patients with T2D (66.7 ± 10.7 years old and 148 men). The patients with high salt intake had a higher body mass index (25.0 ± 4.0 vs. 23.4 ± 3.8 kg/m2, p < 0.001) than those with low salt intake. HSI in patients with high salt intake was higher than that in patients with low salt intake (36.2 ± 6.2 vs. 34.3 ± 5.5 points, p = 0.005). In addition, the presence of NALFD in patients with high salt intake was higher than that in patients with low salt intake (44.5% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.005). High salt intake was associated with the prevalence of NAFLD [adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 (95% confidence interval: 1.02–3.03), p = 0.043].
Conclusion
This cross-sectional study revealed that salt intake is related to the prevalence of NAFLD in patients with T2D.
Keywords: salt intake, diet, NAFLD, type 2 diabetes, nutrition
Introduction
Non–alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with chronic liver disease (1). NAFLD is regarded as the hepatic phenotype of ectopic accumulation of fat due to abdominal obesity and insulin resistance, and its existence relates to the accumulation of fat in visceral, perivascular, epicardial, and intramuscular tissues (2, 3). Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) often suffer from NAFLD (3). The presence of NAFLD is especially high in people with obesity and/or T2D, and it has
been found that NAFLD is present in approximately 50–60% of patients with T2D (4, 5). Preexisting diabetes was increasing the risk of NAFLD and death related to the liver in prospective studies (6, 7). Therefore, NAFLD in patients with T2D deserves more caution than in people without diabetes.
Lifestyle, including dietary habits, affects to NAFLD development. Excess energy intake increases hepatic fat mass (4), and eating fast has been related to the prevalence of NAFLD in patients with T2D (8). Moreover, an association between salt intake and NAFLD in the general population has been reported (9, 10). High salt intake raises blood pressure and increases the risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) (11, 12). Furthermore, the relationship between high salt intake and a risk of obesity were shown in previous studies (13–17). High salt intake has been established as a risk of metabolic disorders (18–21). However, the association between salt intake and NAFLD in patients with T2D has not been clarified yet. Thus, this cross-sectional study intended to reveal the correlation between salt intake and NAFLD in patients with T2D.
Materials and Methods
Study Participants
Since 2014, we have been conducting a prospective cohort study, the KAMOGAWA-DM cohort study, which aims to identify the natural history of people with diabetes (22). In the present study, we enrolled outpatients of the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (KPUM) Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) or the Department of Diabetology at Kameoka Municipal Hospital (Kameoka, Japan) who completed questionnaires between January 2016 and December 2018. This study excluded people with the following characteristics: non-T2D, absent data on hepatic steatosis index (HSI), viral hepatitis, liver cancer, alcohol consumption ≥ 20 g/day (23), absent data on urinary creatinine (Cr) and sodium (Na), and incomplete questionnaires. The approve of present study was obtained from the ethics committee of KPUM (No. RBMR-E-466-6) and this study was executed according to the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was provided from all participants.
Data Collection
Smoking status and physical activity were assessed by questionnaires. “Habit of smoking” was defined as smoking cigarettes or another tobacco product currently. “Habit of exercise” was defined as an engagement in any type of exercise once a week or more. Additionally, all participants were questioned about the duration of their diabetes. Venous blood was gathered after fasting all night and checked for the following factors: plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine (Cr). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated as 194 × age−0.287 × Cr−1.094 (if women, ×0.739) (mL/min/1.73 m2) as defined by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (24).
Body mass index (BMI) was evaluated by dividing body weight (kg) by height2 (m2). Ideal body weight (IBW) was calculated as 22 × (square of the participant's height [m2]) (25). In addition, data on medications, including antidiabetic and antihypertensive drugs, were gathered from patients' records. Blood pressure was tested automatically using an HEM-906 device (OMRON, Kyoto, Japan) in a sitting posture after 5 min of rest in a quiet room. Hypertension was defined as the use of antihypertensive drugs, systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, and/or diastolic pressure ≥ 90 mmHg (26).
Questionnaire for Dietary Habit
We evaluated the participants' habitual food and nutrient intake during the previous 1 month using a brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ). The validity and detail of the BDHQ have been shown previously (27). Energy intake (kcal/day), protein intake (g/day), carbohydrate intake (g/day), fat intake (g/day), alcohol consumption (g/day) and fiber intake (g/day) were assessed using the BDHQ. Furthermore, energy (kcal/IBW/day), protein (g/IBW/day), carbohydrate (g/IBW/day), fat (g/IBW/day) intakes were estimated by each intake divided by IBW.
Definition of Salt Intake
The patients supplied samples of urine from their second early morning urination. Urinalysis was performed to assess densities of Cr (mg/dL) and Na (mg/dL). We estimated the 24 h salt intake with the Tanaka formula (28, 29): Estimated 24 h salt intake (g/day) = [21.98 × (urinary Na (mg/dL)/ urinay Cr/ 10 × (−2.043 × age + 14.89 × body weight (kg) + 16.14 × height (cm) −2244.5)∧0.392]/ 17.
Patients with high salt intake were defined as those consuming more than the median intake of 9.5 g/day.
Definition of NAFLD
Patients who consumed alcohol were excluded from the study. HSI (30), which is calculated using the ALT/AST ratio, sex, BMI, and impaired fasting glucose (defined as blood glucose levels > 110 mg/dL) was utilized for the prevalence of fatty liver. The formula for HSI was as follows: HSI = 8 × (ALT/AST) + BMI [+2, if impaired fasting glucose (all of the participants in the present study); + 2, if women]. Patients having NAFLD were defined as those with a HSI score ≥ 36 points.
Statistical Analysis
Data are shown as a mean ± standard deviation (SD) or frequencies of potential confounding variables. Patients were divided into two groups according to their salt intake. The differences in the categorical and continuous variables were assessed by the Student's t-test and chi-square test, respectively.
Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between having NAFLD and taking high salt intake. The independent variables were age, HbA1c, sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, insulin treatment, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, duration of diabetes, exercise, smoking, energy and dietary fiber intake.
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) (31).
Results
The present study included 425 patients. We excluded 115 patients: 35 patients were not T2D, one patient had liver cancer, 10 patients had viral hepatitis, 2 patients had not known liver disease, 21 patients did not complete questionnaires, 42 patients had the habit of drinking alcohol, 3 patients did not have urinary data, and one patient did not calculate HSI due to lack of data; thus, the final study population consisted of 310 patients (148 men and 162 women) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Study flow diagram for the registration of patients. BDHQ, a brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire; HSI, hepatic steatosis index; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
The characteristics of the study participants are indicated in Table 1. Mean age and BMI were 66.7 ± 10.7 years, and 24.2 ± 4.0 kg/m2, respectively. Mean HSI was 35.3 ± 5.9 points and the percentage of patients with NAFLD was 36.5%. In addition, the mean salt intake was 9.4 ± 2.5 g/day.
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of study participants.
|
All N = 310 |
|
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 66.7 (10.7) |
| Sex (men/women) | 148 [47.7%] / 162 [52.3%] |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 14.2 (10.0) |
| Family history of diabetes (-/+) | 172 [55.5%] / 138 [44.5%] |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.2 (4.0) |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 133.4 (18.3) |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 78.4 (11.1) |
| Antihypertensive drugs (-/+) | 148 [47.7%] / 162 [52.3%] |
| Presence of hypertension (-/+) | 106 [34.2%] / 204 [65.8%] |
| Insulin (-/+) | 238 [76.8%] / 72 [23.2%] |
| SGLT2 inhibitor (-/+) | 259 [83.5%] / 51 [16.5%] |
| GLP-1 receptor agonist (-/+) | 259 [83.5%] / 51 [16.5%] |
| Habit of smoking (-/+) | 273 [88.1%] / 37 [11.9%] |
| Habit of exercise (-/+) | 155 [50.0%] / 155 [50.0%] |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 56.5 (13.5) |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.3 (1.2) |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 71.7 (30.7) |
| eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) | 69.6 (19.1) |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.5 (0.8) |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.5 (0.4) |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L) | 23.3 (14.5) |
| Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) | 22.8 (9.6) |
| Gamma-glutamyl transferase (IU/L) | 32.7 (32.0) |
| HSI (point) | 35.3 (5.9) |
| The presence of NAFLD (-/+) | 197 [63.5%] / 113 [36.5%] |
| Urinary Creatinine (umol/L) | 87.5 (56.3) |
| Urinary Na (umol/L) | 104.0 (47.3) |
| Salt intake (g/day) | 9.4 (2.5) |
| Total energy intake (kcal/day) | 1674.4 (563.1) |
| Energy intake (kcal/IBW/day) | 29.8 (10.0) |
| Total protein intake (g/day) | 71.3 (27.9) |
| Protein intake (g/IBW/day) | 1.3 (0.5) |
| Total fat intake (g/day) | 54.3 (21.8) |
| Fat intake (g/IBW/day) | 1.0 (0.4) |
| Total carbohydrate intake (g/day) | 217.9 (82.0) |
| Carbohydrate intake (g/IBW/day) | 3.9 (1.4) |
| Dietary fiber intake (g/day) | 12.3 (4.9) |
| Carbohydrate-to-dietary fiber intake ratio | 19.0 (6.8) |
Data were expressed as mean (standard deviation) or number [%]. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HSI, hepatic steatosis index; SGLT2, sodium glucose cotransporter-2.
The characteristics of the patients according to salt intake are indicated in Table 2. The patients with high salt intake were younger (64.9 ± 10.9 vs. 68.6 ± 10.2 years, p = 0.002) and had a higher BMI (25.0 ± 4.0 vs. 23.4 ± 3.8 kg/m2, p < 0.001) than those with low salt intake. HSI in patients with high salt intake was higher than that in patients with low salt intake (36.2 ± 6.2 vs. 34.3 ± 5.5 points, p = 0.005). The presence of NALFD in patients with high salt intake was higher than that in patients with low salt intake (44.5% vs. 28.4%, p = 0.005).
Table 2.
Clinical characteristics according to salt intake.
|
Estimated salt intake (low) N = 155 |
Estimated salt intake (high) N = 155 |
P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 68.6 (10.2) | 64.9 (10.9) | 0.002 |
| Sex (men/women) | 73 [47.1%] / 82 [52.9%] | 75 [48.4%] / 80 [51.6%] | 0.909 |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | 15.0 (10.8) | 13.4 (9.2) | 0.159 |
| Family history of diabetes (-/+) | 80 [51.6%] / 75 [48.4%] | 92 [59.4%] / 63 [40.6%] | 0.209 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.4 (3.8) | 25.0 (4.0) | <0.001 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 133.7 (17.9) | 133.2 (18.7) | 0.814 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77.4 (11.6) | 79.4 (10.6) | 0.119 |
| Antihypertensive drugs (-/+) | 73 [47.1%] / 82 [52.9%] | 75 [48.4%] / 80 [51.6%] | 0.909 |
| Presence of hypertension (-/+) | 75 [48.4%] / 80 [51.6%] | 74 [47.7%] / 81 [52.3%] | 1.000 |
| Insulin (-/+) | 121 [78.1%] / 34 [21.9%] | 117 [75.5%] / 38 [24.5%] | 0.687 |
| SGLT2 inhibitor (-/+) | 135 [87.1%] / 20 [12.9%] | 124 [80.0%] / 31 [20.0%] | 0.126 |
| GLP-1 receptor agonist (-/+) | 134 [86.5%] / 21 [13.5%] | 125 [80.6%] / 30 [19.4%] | 0.220 |
| Habit of smoking (-/+) | 140 [90.3%] / 15 [9.7%] | 133 [85.8%] / 22 [14.2%] | 0.293 |
| Habit of exercise (-/+) | 82 [52.9%] / 73 [47.1%] | 73 [47.1%] / 82 [52.9%] | 0.363 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 7.3 (1.3) | 7.3 (1.2) | 0.766 |
| HbA1c (%) | 56.7 (13.7) | 56.3 (13.4) | 0.766 |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 74.0 (36.3) | 69.4 (23.9) | 0.183 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 67.2 (18.1) | 72.0 (19.9) | 0.025 |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | 1.4 (0.9) | 1.5 (0.8) | 0.100 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.6 (0.4) | 1.5 (0.4) | 0.053 |
| Aspartate aminotransferase (IU/L) | 23.2 (10.4) | 22.5 (8.7) | 0.501 |
| Alanine aminotransferase (IU/L) | 23.2 (14.8) | 23.4 (14.3) | 0.894 |
| Gamma-glutamyl transferase (IU/L) | 33.7 (38.4) | 31.7 (24.1) | 0.587 |
| HSI (point) | 34.3 (5.5) | 36.2 (6.2) | 0.005 |
| Presence of NAFLD (-/+) | 111 [71.6%] / 44 [28.4%] | 86 [55.5%] / 69 [44.5%] | 0.005 |
| Urinary Creatinine (umol/L) | 114.2 (61.3) | 60.7 (33.9) | <0.001 |
| Urinary Na (umol/L) | 87.5 (38.4) | 120.6 (49.7) | <0.001 |
| Salt intake (g/day) | 7.4 (1.4) | 11.3 (1.6) | <0.001 |
| Total energy intake (kcal/day) | 1,657.9 (563.0) | 1,691.0 (564.6) | 0.605 |
| Energy intake (kcal/IBW/day) | 29.9 (10.2) | 29.7 (9.8) | 0.877 |
| Total protein intake (g/day) | 72.3 (29.4) | 70.3 (26.3) | 0.531 |
| Protein intake (g/IBW/day) | 1.3 (0.6) | 1.2 (0.5) | 0.223 |
| Total fat intake (g/day) | 54.3 (24.0) | 54.2 (19.6) | 0.984 |
| Fat intake (g/IBW/day) | 1.0 (0.4) | 1.0 (0.4) | 0.593 |
| Total carbohydrate intake (g/day) | 212.4 (75.2) | 223.4 (88.1) | 0.236 |
| Carbohydrate intake (g/IBW/day) | 3.8 (1.3) | 3.9 (1.5) | 0.552 |
| Dietary fiber intake (g/day) | 12.3 (4.6) | 12.3 (5.2) | 0.892 |
| Carbohydrate-to-dietary fiber intake ratio | 18.6 (6.5) | 19.3 (7.1) | 0.337 |
Data were expressed as mean (standard deviation) or number [%]. The difference between group was evaluated by Student's t-test or chi-square test. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; GLP-1, glucagon-like peptide-1; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HSI, hepatic steatosis index; SGLT2, sodium glucose cotransporter-2.
The association between salt intake and the prevalence of NAFLD is shown in Table 3. High salt intake was related to the presence of NAFLD [adjusted odds ratio, 1.76 (95% confidence interval: 1.02−3.03), p = 0.043].
Table 3.
Odds ratio of salt intake on the presence of NAFLD.
| Model1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | OR (95% CI) | p | |
| Salt intake (high) | 2.02 (1.26–3.24) | 0.003 | 1.72 (1.01–2.94) | 0.047 | 1.76 (1.02–3.03) | 0.043 |
| Age (years) | - | - | 0.97 (0.94–0.99) | 0.017 | 0.97 (0.94–0.995) | 0.020 |
| Duration of diabetes (years) | - | - | 0.94 (0.91–0.97) | <0.001 | 0.94 (0.90–0.97) | <0.001 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | - | - | 1.02 (0.997–1.04) | 0.085 | 1.02 (0.997–1.04) | 0.084 |
| Insulin treatment | - | - | 0.85 (0.43–1.68) | 0.641 | 0.94 (0.47–1.88) | 0.868 |
| SGLT2 inhibitor | - | - | 2.50 (1.25–4.99) | 0.010 | 2.31 (1.14–4.70) | 0.020 |
| GLP-1 receptor agonist | - | - | 3.17 (1.51–6.67) | 0.003 | 2.88 (1.35–6.13) | 0.006 |
| Habit of exercise | - | - | - | - | 1.14 (0.52–2.53) | 0.742 |
| Habit of smoking | - | - | - | - | 1.14 (0.52–2.53) | 0.742 |
| Energy intake (kcal/IBW/day) | - | - | - | - | 1.04 (1.00–1.07) | 0.036 |
| Dietary fiber intake (g/day) | - | - | - | - | 0.91 (0.84–0.97) | 0.008 |
Model 1 is unadjusted; Model 2 is adjusted for age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, insulin treatment, SGLT2 inhibitor, GLP-1 receptor agonist; Model 3 is adjusted for age, duration of diabetes, HbA1c, insulin treatment, SGLT2 inhibitor, GLP-1 receptor agonist, habit of exercise, habit of smoking, energy intake, dietary fiber intake.
Discussion
This is the initial study to clarify the relationship between salt intake and the prevalence of NAFLD in patients with T2D. The findings of the present study indicated that high salt intake is related to the presence of NAFLD in patients with T2D.
There are several possible interactions between high salt intake and NAFLD. NAFLD is regarded as the hepatic element of metabolic syndrome, with inordinate accumulation of fat and insulin resistance acting functioning as the major contributors in its pathophysiology (32, 33). High salt intake is known to induce insulin resistance (34) and white adipose tissue mass (13, 15, 35). The present study indicates that high salt intake might be associated with the presence of NAFLD because it promotes insulin resistance and fat accumulation. Previous studies have found that a high salt intake is associated with NAFLD in the general population (9, 10). Additionally, animal studies have revealed that high salt diet decreases the liver's antioxidant defenses (36) and may promote inflammation and fibrosis in liver (37). In a previous study, high salt intake led to an increase in the sodium levels in liver tissue whereas it was accompanied by a decline in mitochondrial respiratory activity (38). Mitochondrial dysfunction enhances hepatocyte steatosis (38). Moreover, recent experimental studies have shown that high salt intake induces leptin resistance via activating the aldose reductase–fructokinase pathway, production of endogenous fructose and increased white adipose tissue mass via leptin production and adipocyte hypertrophy in the liver (14, 35, 39). Leptin resistance leads to fatty fiver (14). Animal studies have revealed that leptin prevents ectopic fat accumulation and lipotoxicity (40). Leptin resistance might facilitate the accumulating fat in the liver and explain the occurrence of hepatic steatosis. The relationship between leptin resistance and NAFLD has been reported in patients with T2D (41).
This study had some limitations. First, salt intake was not accurately measured. Although the Na excretion, which was estimated using the aforementioned formula, has been reported to correlate with the measured 24 h Na excretion (r = 0.54, p < 0.01) (29), a previous study showed that data from the Tanaka formula are underestimated when excretion is low and are overestimated when excretion is high (42). Thus, to accurately assess salt intake, multiple sampling of 24 h urinary collections were necessary. Second, plasma leptin levels were not included. Therefore, the causal association between salt intake, leptin levels, and NAFLD is not clear. Third, the results of BDHQ reflect the previous month's dietary habits. Thus, it is possible that the results of BDHQ may not reflect the content of food intake when estimating the 24 h salt intake using the Tanaka formula. Fourth, due to the cross-sectional nature of this study, it was impossible to exhibit a causal association. We need further research, such as conducting a longitudinal study. Furthermore, previous studies have showed that people with high salt intake have unhealthy lifestyles, and that there is a higher risk of obese than people without high salt intake (43, 44). However, this study did not fully consider lifestyle. Therefore, there might be unknown confounders. Fifth, the impact of each antidiabetic or antihypertensive medication on sodium excretion is different (45–51). However, this study did not fully consider the impact of antidiabetic or antihypertensive medications on sodium excretion. Moreover, NAFLD itself may affect sodium excretion by affecting the renin-angiotensin system (52). Finally, diagnosis of NAFLD was not performed using liver biopsy, although it is the gold standard. Moreover, we did not use other non-invasive techniques, such as ultrasound, FibroScan, or MRI, for the diagnosis of fatty liver (53). However, the correlation between HSI and the definition of NAFLD using ultrasonography has been assessed (30).
In conclusion, to the best of our knowledge, the present study shows that salt intake is related to the prevalence of NAFLD in patients with T2D. It is suggested that the control of salt intake is crucial not only for blood pressure and CVD prevention but also for the prevention of NAFLD in patients with T2D.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
FT designed the work, analyzed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. YH conceived and designed the work, acquired, analyzed, interpreted the data, and revised the manuscript. AK and RS conceived and designed the study, acquired data, and contributed to the discussion. YK, TOk, NK, TOs, NN, SM, TS, HO, and EU acquired data and contributed to the discussion. MH designed the work, acquired the data, and discussed the results. MF conceived and designed the study, acquired and interpreted the data, and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript, contributed to the article, and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
YH received personal fees from Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Kowa Company Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. outside of the submitted work. HO received grant support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., MSD K.K., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Company Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation. NN received grant support from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers: 19K23999 and 20K16158) and the Japan Food Chemical Research Foundation, and personal fees from Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd. and Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. TOs received grants from Combi Corporation and personal fees from Toa Eiyo Corp., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharma Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., and AstraZeneca K.K., outside of the submitted work. TS received personal fees from Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Kowa Pharma Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Taisho Toyama Pharma Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharma Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., and Takeda Pharma Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. EU received grant support from the Japanese Study Group for Physiology and Management of Blood Pressure, Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders (grant number: 4024), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Mishima Kaiun Memorial Foundation, and personal fees from Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., and MSD K.K. outside of the submitted work. The donated fund laboratory of diabetes therapeutics is an endowment department supported by an unrestricted grant from Taiyo Kagaku Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. MH received grants from Yamada Bee Farm, Oishi Kenko Inc., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., and Ono Pharma Co., Ltd. and personal fees from Eli Lilly, Japan, Sanofi K.K., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., AstraZeneca K.K., Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., and Kowa Pharma Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. MF received grants from Eli Lilly, Japan, K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Sanwa Kagagu Kenkyusho Co., Ltd., Oishi Kenko Inc., MSD K.K., Kowa Pharma Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharma Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Ono Pharma Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Johnson & Johnson K.K. Medical Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Yamada Bee Farm, Taisho Pharma Co., Ltd., Terumo Corp., Takeda Pharma Co., Ltd., Tejin Pharma Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Nippon Chemiphar Co., Ltd., and TERUMO CORPORATION, and personal fees from Astellas Pharma Inc., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Mochida Pharma Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Kissei Pharma Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., TERUMO CORPORATION, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., Takeda Pharma Co., Ltd., Teijin Pharma Ltd., Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., Taisho Pharma Co., Ltd., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Arkray Inc., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Kowa Pharma Co., Ltd., Nipro Corp., and Sanofi K.K., outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
References
- 1.Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease—Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. (2016) 64:73–84. 10.1002/hep.28431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tilg H, Moschen AR, Roden M. NAFLD and diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2017) 14:32–42. 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Adams LA, Anstee QM, Tilg H, Targher G. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its relationship with cardiovascular disease and other extrahepatic diseases. Gut. (2017) 66:1138–53. 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice Guideline by the american association for the study of liver diseases, american college of gastroenterology, and the american gastroenterological association. Hepatology. (2012) 55:2005–23. 10.1002/hep.25762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dai W, Ye L, Liu A, Wen SW, Deng J, Wu X, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Medicine. (2017) 96:e8179. 10.1097/MD.0000000000008179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Matteoni CA, Boparai N, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. (2004) 2:262–5. 10.1016/S1542-3565(04)00014-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Porepa L, Ray JG, Sanchez-Romeu P, Booth GL. Newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for serious liver disease. CMAJ. (2010) 182:526–31. 10.1503/cmaj.092144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Takahashi F, Hashimoto Y, Kawano R, Kaji A, Sakai R, Kawate Y, et al. Eating fast is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in men but not in women with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1–12. 10.3390/nu12082174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shen X, Jin C, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Wang X, Huang W, et al. Prospective study of perceived dietary salt intake and the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hum Nutr Diet. (2019) 32:802–9. 10.1111/jhn.12674 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huh JH, Lee KJ, Lim JS, Lee MY, Park HJ, Kim MY, et al. High dietary sodium intake assessed by estimated 24-h urinary sodium excretion is associated with NAFLD and hepatic fibrosis. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:1–11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0143222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.He FJ Li J, MacGregor GA. Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. (2013) 346:f1325. 10.1136/bmj.f1136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Strazzullo P, D'Elia L, Kandala NB, Cappuccio FP. Salt intake, stroke, and cardiovascular disease: Meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ. (2009) 339:1296. 10.1136/bmj.b4567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yoon YS, Oh SW. Sodium density and obesity; the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey 2007-2010. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2013) 67:141–6. 10.1038/ejcn.2012.204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lanaspa MA, Kuwabara M, Andres-Hernando A, Li N, Cicerchi C, Jensen T, et al. High salt intake causes leptin resistance and obesity in mice by stimulating endogenous fructose production and metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. (2018) 115:3138–43. 10.1073/pnas.1713837115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou L, Stamler J, Chan Q, van Horn L, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, et al. Salt intake and prevalence of overweight/obesity in Japan, China, the United Kingdom, and the United States: the INTERMAP study. Am J Clin Nutr. (2019) 110:34–40. 10.1093/ajcn/nqz067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Larsen SC, Ängquist L, Sørensen TIA, Heitmann BL. 24h urinary sodium excretion and subsequent change in weight, waist circumference and body composition. PLoS ONE. (2013) 8:e69689. 10.1371/journal.pone.0069689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yoshida Y, Kosaki K, Sugasawa T, Matsui M. High salt diet impacts the risk of sarcopenia associated with reduction of skeletal muscle. Nutrients. (2020) 1–14. 10.3390/nu12113474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zivkovic AM, German JB, Sanyal AJ. Comparative review of diets for the metabolic syndrome: implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Clin Nutr. (2007) 86:285–300. 10.1093/ajcn/86.2.285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yi SS, Kansagra SM. Associations of sodium intake with obesity, body mass index, waist circumference, and weight. Am J Prev Med. (2014) 46:e53–5. 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Baudrand R, Campino C, Carvajal CA, Olivieri O, Guidi G, Faccini G, et al. Increased urinary glucocorticoid metabolites are associated with metabolic syndrome, hypoadiponectinemia, insulin resistance and β cell dysfunction. Steroids. (2011) 76:1575–81. 10.1016/j.steroids.2011.09.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bibbins-Domingo K, Chertow GM, Coxson PG, Moran AE, Lightwood JM, Pletcher MJ, et al. Reductions in cardiovascular disease projected from modest reductions in dietary salt. N Eng J Med. (2010) 362:590–9. 10.1056/NEJMoa0907355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sakai R, Hashimoto Y, Ushigome E, Miki A, Okamura T, Matsugasumi M, et al. Late-night-dinner is associated with poor glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes: the KAMOGAWA-DM cohort study. Endocr J. (2018) 65:395–402. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kaji A, Hashimoto Y, Sakai R, Okada H, Hamaguchi M, Ushigome E, et al. Frequent usage of convenience stores is associated with low diet quality. Nutrients. (2019) 11:1–11. 10.3390/nu11061212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Matsuo S, Imai E, Horio M, Yasuda Y, Tomita K, Nitta K, et al. Revised equations for estimated GFR from serum creatinine in Japan. Am J Kidney Dis. (2009) 53:982–92. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lemmens HJM, Brodsky JB, Bernstein DP. Estimating ideal body weight—A new formula. Obes Surg. (2005) 15:1082–3. 10.1381/0960892054621350 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Carretero OA, Oparil S. Essential hypertension part I: definition and etiology. Circulation. (2000) 101:329–335. 10.1161/01.cir.101.3.329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kobayashi S, Honda S, Murakami K, Sasaki S, Okubo H, Hirota N, et al. Both comprehensive and brief self-administered diet history questionnaires satisfactorily rank nutrient intakes in Japanese adults. J Epidemiol. (2012) 22:151–9. 10.2188/jea.JE20110075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koo HS, Kim YC, Ahn SY, Oh SW, Kim S, Chin HJ, et al. Estimating 24-hour urine sodium level with spot urine sodium and creatinine. J Korean Med Sci. (2014) 29:S97–102. 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.S2.S97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tanaka T, Okamura T, Miura K, Kadowaki T, Ueshima H, Nakagawa H. A simple method to estimate populational 24-h urinary sodium and potassium. J Hum Hypertens. (2002) 97–103. 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee JH, Kim D, Kim HJ, Lee CH, Yang JI, Kim W. Journal of Korean Medical Science al. Hepatic steatosis index: a simple screening tool reflecting nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Liver Dis. (2010) 42:503–8. 10.1016/j.dld.2009.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2013) 48:452–8. 10.1038/bmt.2012.244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park JH. Insulin resistance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Korean J Hepatol. (2006) 12:16–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Koda M, Kawakami M, Murawaki Y, Senda M. The impact of visceral fat in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. J Gastroenterol. (2007) 42:897–903. 10.1007/s00535-007-2107-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ogihara T, Asano T, Ando K, Sakoda H, Anai M, Shojima N, et al. High-salt diet enhances insulin signaling and induces insulin resistance in Dahl salt-sensitive rats. Hypertension. (2002) 40:83–9. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000022880.45113.C9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fonseca-Alaniz MH, Brito LC, Borges-Silva CN, Takada J, Andreotti S, Lima FB. High dietary sodium intake increases white adipose tissue mass and plasma leptin in rats. Obesity. (2007) 15:2200–8. 10.1038/oby.2007.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dornas WC, de Lima WG, dos Santos RC, da Costa Guerra JF, de Souza MO, Silva M, et al. High dietary salt decreases antioxidant defenses in the liver of fructose-fed insulin-resistant rats. J Nutr Biochem. (2013) 24:2016–22. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2013.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Uetake Y, Ikeda H, Irie R, Tejima K, Matsui H, Ogura S, et al. High-salt in addition to high-fat diet may enhance inflammation and fibrosis in liver steatosis induced by oxidative stress and dyslipidemia in mice. Lipids Health Dis. (2015) 14:2–9. 10.1186/s12944-015-0002-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gao P, You M, Li L, Zhang Q, Fang X, Wei X, et al. Salt-induced hepatic inflammatory memory contributes to cardiovascular damage through epigenetic modulation of SIRT3. Circulation. (2022) 145:375–91. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fonseca-Alaniz MH, Takada J, Andreotti S, de Campos TBF, Campãa AB, Borges-Silva CN, et al. High sodium intake enhances insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in rat epididymal adipose tissue. Obesity. (2008) 16:1186–92. 10.1038/oby.2008.69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lee Y, Wang MY, Kakuma T, Wang ZW, Babcock E, McCorkle K, et al. Liporegulation in diet-induced obesity: the antisteatotic role of hyperleptinemia. J Biol Chem. (2001) 276:5629–35. 10.1074/jbc.M008553200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cernea S, Roiban AL, Both E, Hutanu A. Serum leptin and leptin resistance correlations with NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. (2018) 34:e3050. 10.1002/dmrr.3050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dougher CE, Rifkin DE, Anderson CAM, Smits G, Persky MS, Block GA, et al. Spot urine sodium measurements do not accurately estimate dietary sodium intake in chronic kidney disease. Am J Clin Nutr. (2016) 104:298–305. 10.3945/ajcn.115.127423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Colin-Ramirez E, McAlister FA, Woo E, Wong N, Ezekowitz JA. Association between self-reported adherence to a low-sodium diet and dietary habits related to sodium intake in heart failure patients. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2015) 30:58–65. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Choi KH, Park MS, Kim JA, Lim JA. Associations between excessive sodium intake and smoking and alcohol intake among Korean men: KNHANES V. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2015) 12:15540–9. 10.3390/ijerph121215001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ferrannini E, Baldi S, Frascerra S, Astiarraga B, Barsotti E, Clerico A, et al. Renal handling of ketones in response to sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. (2017) 40:771–6. 10.2337/dc16-2724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Moreno C, Mistry M, Roman RJ. Renal effects of glucagon-like peptide in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. (2002) 434:163–7. 10.1016/S0014-2999(01)01542-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gupta AK, Clark RV, Kirchner KA. Effects of insulin on renal sodium excretion. Hypertension. (1992) 19:I78–82. 10.1161/01.hyp.19.1_Suppl.i78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Endo Y, Suzuki M, Yamada H, Horita S, Kunimi M, Yamazaki O, et al. Thiazolidinediones enhance sodium-coupled bicarbonate absorption from renal proximal tubules via PPARγ-dependent nongenomic signaling. Cell Metab. (2011) 13:550–61. 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.02.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Packer M. Worsening heart failure during the use of DPP-4 inhibitors: pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical risks, and potential influence of concomitant antidiabetic medications. JACC Hear Fail. (2018) 6:445–51. 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lim PO, MacFadyen RJ, Struthers AD. Is there a role for renin profiling in selecting chronic heart failure patients for ACE inhibitor treatment? Heart. (2000) 83:257–61. 10.1136/heart.83.3.257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Filipowicz E, Staszków M. Diuretics. Wiad Lek. (2013) 66:319–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Paschos P, Tziomalos K. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and the renin-angiotensin system: Implications for treatment. World J Hepatol. (2012) 4:327–31. 10.4254/wjh.v4.i12.327 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ballestri S, Nascimbeni F, Baldelli E, Marrazzo A, Romagnoli D, Targher G, et al. Ultrasonographic fatty liver indicator detects mild steatosis and correlates with metabolic/histological parameters in various liver diseases. Metabolism. (2017) 72:57–65. 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.