Abstract
Objective. The main aim of this study is to examine the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in older patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and the secondary aim is to examine sex difference in LDL-C target achievement. Methods. Patients aged ≥60 years with ACS admitted to a tertiary hospital in Vietnam were recruited from December 2019 to August 2020. LDL-C target achievement was defined as having an LDL-C goal of <1.8 mmol/L. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to investigate the predictive factors for LDL-C target achievement. Results. A total of 232 participants were included in this study (mean age 75.5 years, 40.1% were women). Participants had an average of three chronic conditions other than coronary heart disease. All participants were prescribed statin monotherapy at discharge (59.5% on high-intensity statins). After 3 months, 218 (94.0%) of the participants were on statin monotherapy, 14 (6.0%) were on statin combined with ezetimibe. The proportion of participants that achieved LDL-C target after 3 months was 56.5% (40.9% in women and 66.9% in men, p < 0.001). On univariate logistic regression, women were less likely to achieve their LDL-C target compared to men (unadjusted OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20–0.59). This association was still significant in the adjusted model (adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24–0.78). Other factors that were significantly associated with LDL-C target achievement included age, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, LDL-C level on admission, history of using statin before admission, and high-intensity statin prescribed at discharge. Conclusions. Our study found that nearly a half of older patients with ACS did not achieve their LDL-C target after 3 months, and suboptimal control of LDL-C was more common in women.
Keywords: acute coronary syndrome, secondary prevention, lipid management, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elderly, frailty
1. Introduction
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of mortality globally [1,2]. Dyslipidemia is one of the most important factors in the pathophysiology of acute coronary syndrome, and the retention of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) inside the arterial wall is the key initiating event in atherogenesis [3]. Evidence from clinical trials indicated that lower LDL-C values are associated with lower risk of future cardiovascular events and that statin use in patients after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can improve clinical outcomes [4,5].
The prevalence of coronary heart disease increases with age, and older patients account for a large proportion of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome [6]. Although cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in both men and women, women are less likely to be on secondary prevention treatments as they get older, and studies have shown higher risk of mortality and side effects from cardiovascular therapies in women compared to men [7]. The menopausal transition may contribute to changes in cardiovascular risk in women, including changes in body fat distribution and vascular inflammation [8]. In Vietnam, cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality, and coronary heart disease is common in older people [9,10,11,12]. Understanding the status of achieving treatment goals is important to inform clinical practice, especially in older and frail patients. However, there is limited evidence on the achievement of LDL-C targets in older patients with coronary heart disease in Vietnam. Therefore, in this study on older patients with acute coronary syndrome, we aimed to investigate the proportion of patients attaining LDL-C targets at three months after discharge. The secondary aim was to examine sex differences in LDL-C target achievement in this population.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Population
This was a prospective observational study at the Department of Interventional Cardiology, Thong Nhat Hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, from December 2019 to August 2020. Inclusion criteria included (1) age ≥60 years; (2) being diagnosed with ACS on admission, including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and unstable angina; and (3) being prescribed with statins at discharge. Patients were excluded from this study if (1) they did not provide consent; (2) they died during hospitalization.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Thong Nhat Hospital (33/2019/BVTN-HDYD). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
2.2. Sample Size Calculation
The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula: n = (1.96/d)2 × p × (1 − p), with n = the required sample size, p = proportion of patients achieving LDL-C target, and d = precision (assumed as 0.07). Taking references from reports from China, Singapore, and Thailand [13,14,15], we estimated that the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C target would be around 35%. Therefore, the sample size for this study was calculated to be at least 216 participants (allowing for 20% drop-out in three months of follow up).
2.3. Data Collection
Data were collected from patient interviews and from medical records. Information obtained included demographic characteristics, height, weight, medical history, history of using statin before this admission, comorbidities, frailty, admission diagnosis, laboratory results during hospitalization including lipid profiles, and medications prescribed upon discharge.
All participants were invited to attend a visit at the study clinics at the end of the third month after discharge. During this visit, participants were interviewed to obtain information about current medication use. Fasting serum lipid profile tests were conducted at this visit.
2.4. Variable Definition
2.4.1. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)
In this study, ACS referred to these three conditions [16]:
-
(1)
ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): patients with acute chest pain and persistent (>20 min) ST-segment elevation on ECGs, with troponin changes.
-
(2)
Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): patients with acute chest discomfort but no persistent ST-segment elevation on ECGs, with troponin changes.
-
(3)
Unstable angina: unstable angina is defined as myocardial ischemia at rest or on minimal exertion in the absence of acute cardiomyocyte injury/necrosis (no troponin changes), without persistent ST-segment elevation.
2.4.2. Outcome Variable
The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients achieving therapeutic LDL-C targets while on statin treatment after 3-month follow up, defined as an LDL-C goal of <1.8 mmol/L (<70 mg/dL) at the third month after discharge, as recommended by the 2015 guidelines for the diagnosis and management of dyslipidemia from the Vietnam Heart Association [17].
2.4.3. Predictive Variables
Demographics and Lifestyle Factors
Age and sex were used as recorded in medical records. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was calculated based on measured weight (kg) and height (m) and was classified into 4 groups: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal (BMI 18.5–22.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 23–24.9 kg/m2), and obese (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2). Smoking status was categorized based on self-report as non-smoking or smoking (including current smokers or ex-smokers who stopped smoking less than 1 year ago). Sedentary lifestyle was defined if participants did not do any regular physical exercise or walking for at least 20 min for at least 3 days a week.
Comorbidities
Comorbidities were obtained from medical records and were categorized into a list of 18 conditions: diabetes, obesity, hypertension, heart failure, stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrial fibrillation, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stomach problem, gout, osteoarthritis, cancer, anxiety, anemia, dementia, thyroid problem, urinary problem.
Frailty
Participant’s frailty status was defined according to the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) [18,19]. The CFS score ranges from 1 to 9, with a score of at least 5 indicating a frailty status [18,20].
Statin Prescription at Discharge
The type and dose of statins prescribed at discharge were documented. High-intensity statins were defined as rosuvastatin 20–40 mg or atorvastatin 40–80 mg [4].
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Analysis of the data was performed using SPSS for Windows 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviation, and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons between groups (achieving/non-achieving of LDL-C targets, men/women) were conducted using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables.
To examine the impact of sex on LDL-C target achievement after 3 months, multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied with sex as the independent variable of interest, adjusting for the factors that can affect LDL-C target achievement based on clinical rationale (such as age, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, overweight and obesity, comorbidities, frailty, history of using statin, statin strength, LDL level at baseline, and whether the participants received percutaneous coronary intervention or not).
All variables were examined for interaction and multicollinearity. Results are presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
3. Results
3.1. Study Sample Characteristics
Table 1 presents the characteristics of participants stratified by achievement of LDL-C target. There were 264 participants who met the selection criteria, 32 participants were lost during the 3 months of follow up. Therefore, 232 participants were included in the analysis. They had a mean age of 75.5 years; 40.1% were women, and 64.2% were frail. Overall, participants had an average of three chronic conditions besides coronary heart disease, with no significant difference in the total number of comorbidities as well as in the prevalence of each disease between the two groups. The most common cardiometabolic comorbidities were hypertension (94.8%), heart failure (51.7%), and diabetes (45.7%). The most common non-cardiometabolic comorbidities were stomach disorder (61.9%) and chronic kidney disease (22.4%). The prevalence rates of overweight/obesity and of having sedentary lifestyle were high (Table 1).
Table 1.
Participant characteristics.
| Variables | All Participants (n = 232) |
|---|---|
| Age | 75.4 ± 9.4 |
| Sex: | |
| Female | 93 (40.1) |
| Male | 139 (59.9) |
| BMI: | |
| Underweight | 20 (8.6) |
| Normal | 111 (47.8) |
| Overweight | 48 (20.7) |
| Obese | 53 (22.8) |
| Sedentary lifestyle | 101 (43.5) |
| Smoking | 35 (15.1) |
| History of using statin before admission | 121 (52.2) |
| History of myocardial infarction | 40 (17.2) |
| History of percutaneous coronary intervention | 65 (28.0) |
| Treated with percutaneous coronary intervention during admission | 128 (55.2) |
| ACS types: | |
| STEMI | 34 (14.7) |
| NSTEMI | 122 (52.6) |
| Unstable angina | 76 (32.8) |
| Frailty (CFS score ≥ 5) | 149 (64.2) |
| Total number of comorbidities | 3.16 ± 1.22 |
| Cardiovascular comorbidities: | |
| Hypertension | 220 (94.8) |
| Heart failure | 120 (51.7) |
| Diabetes | 106 (45.7) |
| Atrial fibrillation | 18 (7.8) |
| Peripheral artery disease | 17 (7.3) |
| Stroke/transient ischemic attack | 13 (5.6) |
| Non-cardiovascular comorbidities: | |
| Stomach problem | 143 (61.9) |
| Chronic kidney disease | 52 (22.4) |
| Urinary problem | 10 (4.3) |
| Cancer | 9 (3.9) |
| Gout | 8 (3.4) |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 7 (3.0) |
| Osteoarthritis | 7 (3.0) |
| Anemia | 6 (2.6) |
| Anxiety | 4 (1.7) |
| Dementia | 2 (0.9) |
| Thyroid problem | 1 (0.4) |
Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data are shown as n (%). LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; BMI, body mass index; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; NSTEMI, non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; CFS, Clinical Frailty Scale.
3.2. Statin Utilization
Overall, 52.2% of the participants had a history of using statins before this admission, with no significant difference between those with and without LDL-C target achievement (46.6% and 59.4%, p = 0.052, respectively).
Details of statin prescription at discharge are presented in Table 2. Upon discharge, 59.5% of the participants were prescribed high-intensity statins, higher in participants achieving LDL-C target compared to participants who did not achieve LDL-C target (66.4% versus 50.5%, p = 0.014, respectively).
Table 2.
Prescription of statin at discharge.
| Variables | All Participants (n = 232) |
Did Not Achieve LDL-C Target after 3 Months (n = 101) |
Achieved LDL-C Target after 3 Months (n = 131) |
p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statin types: | ||||
| Atorvastatin 10 mg | 8 (3.4) | 4 (4.0) | 4 (3.1) | 0.101 |
| Atorvastatin 20 mg | 76 (32.8) | 40 (39.6) | 36 (27.5) | |
| Rosuvastatin 10 mg | 10 (4.3) | 6 (5.9) | 4 (3.1) | |
| Rosuvastatin 20 mg | 138 (59.5) | 51 (50.5) | 87 (66.4) | |
| Statin strength: | ||||
| High-intensity statins | 138 (59.5) | 51 (50.5) | 87 (66.4) | 0.014 |
| Non-high-intensity statins | 94 (40.5) | 50 (49.5) | 44 (33.6) | |
Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data are shown as n (%). LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
After 3 months, 218 (94.0%) of the participants were still on statin monotherapy, and 14 (6.0%) were on statin combined with ezetimibe (Table 3).
Table 3.
Statin use after 3-month follow up.
| Variables | All Participants (n = 232) |
Not Achieving LDL-C Target after 3 Months (n = 101) |
Achieving LDL-C Target after 3 Months (n = 131) |
p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statin monotherapy | 218 (94.0) | 95 (94.1) | 123 (93.9) | 0.958 |
| Statin plus ezetimibe | 14 (6.0) | 6 (5.9) | 8 (6.1) |
Continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data are shown as n (%). LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
3.3. LDL-C Target Attainment
Overall, 56.5% (131/232) of the participants achieved the LDL-C target after 3 months. The median LDL-C level at admission for the entire cohort was 2.45 mmol/L (range 0.70–6.50), 2.9 mmol/L (range 0.80–6.24) in participants who did not achieve the LDL-C target versus 2.2 mmol/L (range 0.70–6.50) in participants achieving the LDL-C target, p < 0.001. After 3 months, the median LDL-C was 1.71 mmol/L (range 0.25–6.85) overall, 2.40 mmol/L (range 1.80–6.85) in the group that did not attain the LDL-C target, and 1.37 mmol/L (range 0.25–1.77) in the group that attained the LDL-C target, p < 0.001.
3.4. Sex Difference in Achieving LDL-C Target
Women had higher baseline LDL-C levels compared to men (median 2.60 mmol/L in women versus 2.33 mmol/L in men, respectively, p = 0.084). After 3 months, women still had higher LDL-C levels (median 2.00 mmol/L versus 1.60 mmol/L in men, p < 0.001) (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at admission and after 3 months in male and female participants.
The proportion of women achieving their LDL-C targets (<1.8 mmol/L) after 3 months was lower compared to that of men (40.9% versus 66.9%, p < 0.001, respectively).
On univariate logistic regression, women were less likely to achieve their LDL-C targets compared to men (unadjusted OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20–0.59). This association was still significant in the adjusted model, with an adjusted OR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.24–0.78). Other factors that had a significant impact on LDL-C target achievement included age, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, LDL-C level on admission, history of using statin before admission, and high-intensity statin prescribed at discharge (Table 4).
Table 4.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression of sex and other factors on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol target achievement.
| Factors | Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted Odds Ratios for LDL-C Target Achievement (95% CI) | p | Adjusted Odds Ratios for LDL-C Target Achievement (95% CI) | p | |
| Female (vs. male) | 0.34 (0.20–0.59) | <0.001 | 0.25 (0.13–0.51) | <0.001 |
| Age | 0.98 (0.95–1.01) | 0.148 | 1.07 (1.02–1.13) | 0.011 |
| Smoking | 0.25 (0.11–0.55) | <0.001 | 0.10 (0.04–0.29) | <0.001 |
| Having sedentary lifestyle | 0.27 (0.15–0.46) | <0.001 | 0.13 (0.05–0.33) | <0.001 |
| Overweight and obesity (body mass index ≥23) | 1.78 (1.04–3.03) | 0.034 | 1.27 (0.64–2.50) | 0.491 |
| Serum LDL-C level at admission (mmol/L) | 0.70 (0.55–0.90) | 0.005 | 0.58 (0.42–0.81) | 0.001 |
| History of using statin before this admission | 0.60 (0.35–1.01) | 0.053 | 0.48 (0.24–0.99) | 0.048 |
| Receiving percutaneous coronary intervention | 1.13 (0.67–1.90) | 0.646 | 1.00 (0.49–2.05) | 0.999 |
| High-intensity statins prescribed at discharge (vs. non-high-intensity statin) | 1.94 (1.14–3.30) | 0.015 | 2.56 (1.23–5.35) | 0.012 |
| Frailty | 0.57 (0.33–0.10) | 0.050 | 0.75 (0.35–1.59) | 0.447 |
| Total number of comorbidities | 1.03 (0.83–1.27) | 0.819 | 1.10 (0.82–1.45) | 0.540 |
LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
4. Discussion
In this study in 232 older patients with ACS, there was a suboptimal control of LDL-C, with only 56.5% of the participants achieved the LDL-C target after 3 months.
Our findings are in line with reports from previous studies, in which less than 45% of patients with high cardiovascular risk could reach the recommended LDL-C targets [15,21,22,23,24,25]. According to the CEPHEUS study conducted in 35,121 participants (mean age 60.4 years) from 29 countries across Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, only 49.4% of the participants obtained their recommended LDL-C goal [22]. This proportion was particularly low in patients with very high cardiovascular risk (23%) compared to 55% in those with high CV risk, and 90% in those with low CV risk [22]. A study in 712 older patients (mean age 61.4 years) in Greece with prior coronary heart disease also reported that the LDL-C target was achieved in only 10% of the participants [23]. Another study in 267 patients with ACS (mean age 69) in Singapore showed that the LDL-C goal attainment rate was 36.7% at 4 months and declined progressively throughout follow up (23.4% at 12 months) [15].
We found that women were less likely to achieve their LDL-C targets compared to men. Sex differences in the effectiveness of statins have been reported in many studies. In a study in 14,710 statin users and 23,833 non-users discharged from hospital after an acute myocardial infarction in Canada, the effect of statin was reduced in women compared to that in men: for all-cause mortality within 1 year of follow up, the adjusted hazard ratios associated with statin use in women were 0.61 (95% CI 0.54–0.69) compared to 0.54 (0.48–0.60) in men, and for cardiac-related mortality within 1 year of follow-up, the adjusted hazard ratios associated with statin use in women were 0.70 (0.60–0.81) compared to 0.59 (0.51–0.69) in men [26]. In a study in 71 men and 166 women treated with different statins in Italy, there was a significantly attenuated reduction of total cholesterol and LDL-C in women compared to that in men after 1 year: −22.7% ± 11.8% in women versus −28.5% ± 11.8% in men vs. (p < 0.001, adjusted for dose and statin power) [27]. In another study in 415,294 patients (45.3% women) from 236 diabetes centers in Italy, women were less likely to reach LDL-C targets than men (45.6% versus 52.8% for women and men, respectively). Pooled analysis from 32,782 patients from 28 countries in the CEPHEUS study also showed that female gender was associated with a reduced likelihood of attaining LDL-C goals (adjusted OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65–0.77) [22].
In addition to sex, we also observed that older age and high-intensity statin prescription at discharge were associated with an increased likelihood of achieving the target, while smoking, sedentary lifestyle, LDL-C level on admission, and history of using statin before admission were associated with a reduced likelihood of achieving the target. As smoking and sedentary lifestyle are modifiable factors, this result suggests that we need to pay more attention to risk factor management in older patients after ACS, particularly for smoking cessation and exercise training programs. There was a high prevalence of physical inactivity in Vietnam [28]. The smoking rates in Vietnam are also very high. According to the Vietnam Global Adult Tobacco Survey in 2015, 45.3% of Vietnamese men were current smokers [29]. In the era of percutaneous coronary intervention and optimal cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, smoking still has a significantly negative impact on survival after ASC. A study in 9375 patients with ACS from the Melbourne Interventional Group registry showed that persistent smoking was an independent predictor of increased mortality after ACS (HR 1.78, 95 CI 1.36–2.32, p < 0.001) [30]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis in 11,228 patients from 39 studies revealed that the majority of smokers with an ACS continue to smoke after discharge and that attending cardiac rehabilitation increased the likelihood of smoking cessation of quitting (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.44–2.51) [31]. Interestingly, participants with a history of using statin before admission were less likely to obtain LDL-C target achievement. More studies are needed to understand statin intolerance, statin resistance, and medication adherence in this group of patients.
Our study has several strengths. To our best knowledge, this is the first study investigating the achievement of LDL-C targets in older patients with ACS in Vietnam. This study was conducted at a large teaching hospital in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, and contained high-quality, detailed clinical information. However, this study also has some limitations. Data were not available on medication adherence to statins. There was also limited information on other relevant factors related to LDL-C target achievement such as economic status and access to statins, the use of other medicines that can have an influence on lipid levels, and familial hypercholesterolemia. This study was conducted at only one hospital in Vietnam. Therefore, the studied population may not be representative of all older patients in Vietnam, and the results should be interpreted cautiously.
In conclusion, our study found that LDL-C control was suboptimal in nearly half of older patients with ACS and that women were less likely to achieve LDL-C target after 3 months compared to men. Greater efforts are needed to improve the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women, and patients should also be assessed for smoking cessation and exercise training programs.
Author Contributions
All authors (T.V.N., D.T.T.T., T.T.K.N. and T.N.N.) contributed to the study concept and study design. T.V.N. led ethics application, recruitment, and data acquisition. T.N.N. led the statistical analysis. Drafting of the manuscript was performed by T.V.N. and T.N.N. All authors were involved in analysis and interpretation of data and revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Thong Nhat Hospital (33/2019/BVTN-HDYD).
Informed Consent Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Data Availability Statement
The study data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Clark H. NCDs: A challenge to sustainable human development. Lancet. 2013;381:510–511. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60058-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.World Health Organisation The Top 10 Causes of Death. [(accessed on 10 September 2019)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.
- 3.Ference B.A., Ginsberg H.N., Graham I., Ray K.K., Packard C.J., Bruckert E., Hegele R.A., Krauss R.M., Raal F.J., Schunkert H., et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur. Heart J. 2017;38:2459–2472. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mach F., Baigent C., Catapano A.L., Koskinas K.C., Casula M., Badimon L., Chapman M.J., De Backer G.G., Delgado V., Ference B.A., et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk: The Task Force for the management of dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Eur. Heart J. 2019;41:111–188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baigent C., Blackwell L., Emberson J., Holland L.E., Reith C., Bhala N., Peto R., Barnes E.H., Keech A., Simes J., et al. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: A meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1670–1681. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61350-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Alexander K.P., Newby L.K., Cannon C.P., Armstrong P.W., Gibler W.B., Rich M.W., Van de Werf F., White H.D., Weaver W.D., Naylor M.D., et al. Acute coronary care in the elderly, part I: Non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology: In collaboration with the Society of Geriatric Cardiology. Circulation. 2007;115:2549–2569. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.107.182615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Walli-Attaei M., Joseph P., Rosengren A., Chow C.K., Rangarajan S., Lear S.A., AlHabib K.F., Davletov K., Dans A., Lanas F., et al. Variations between women and men in risk factors, treatments, cardiovascular disease incidence, and death in 27 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): A prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;396:97–109. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30543-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haider A., Bengs S., Luu J., Osto E., Siller-Matula J.M., Muka T., Gebhard C. Sex and gender in cardiovascular medicine: Presentation and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome. Eur. Heart J. 2020;41:1328–1336. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Nhung N.T., Long T.K., Linh B.N., Vos T., Huong N.T., Anh N.D. Estimation of Vietnam national burden of disease 2008. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 2014;26:527–535. doi: 10.1177/1010539513510556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hoang V.M., Dao L.H., Wall S., Nguyen T.K., Byass P. Cardiovascular disease mortality and its association with socioeconomic status: Findings from a population-based cohort study in rural Vietnam, 1999–2003. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2006;3:A89. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Islam S.M., Purnat T.D., Phuong N.T., Mwingira U., Schacht K., Froschl G. Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in developing countries: A symposium report. Glob. Health. 2014;10:81. doi: 10.1186/s12992-014-0081-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ngo A.D., Rao C., Hoa N.P., Adair T., Chuc N.T. Mortality patterns in Vietnam, 2006: Findings from a national verbal autopsy survey. BMC Res. Notes. 2010;3:78. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-3-78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xing Y., Liu J., Hao Y., Liu J., Huo Y., Smith S.C., Jr., Ge J., Ma C., Han Y., Fonarow G.C., et al. Prehospital statin use and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels at admission in acute coronary syndrome patients with history of myocardial infarction or revascularization: Findings from the Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China (CCC) project. Am. Heart J. 2019;212:120–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chinwong D., Patumanond J., Chinwong S., Siriwattana K., Gunaparn S., Hall J.J., Phrommintikul A. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of less than 70 mg/dL is associated with fewer cardiovascular events in acute coronary syndrome patients: A real-life cohort in Thailand. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2015;11:659–667. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.S78745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chin C.W., Gao F., Le T., Tan R. Lipid goal attainment and prescription behavior in asian patients with acute coronary syndromes: Experience from a tertiary hospital. Clin. Med. Insights Cardiol. 2013;7:51–57. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S11488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Collet J.P., Thiele H., Barbato E., Barthélémy O., Bauersachs J., Bhatt D.L., Dendale P., Dorobantu M., Edvardsen T., Folliguet T., et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:1289–1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vietnam Heart Association The 2015 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Dyslipidaemia. 2015. [(accessed on 12 May 2019)]. Available online: http://vnha.org.vn/cate.asp?cate_id=167.
- 18.Rockwood K., Song X., MacKnight C., Bergman H., Hogan D.B., McDowell I., Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173:489–495. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dent E., Lien C., Lim W.S., Wong W.C., Wong C.H., Ng T.P., Woo J., Dong B., de la Vega S., Hua Poi P.J., et al. The Asia-Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Frailty. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2017;18:564–575. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Muessig J.M., Nia A.M., Masyuk M., Lauten A., Sacher A.L., Brenner T., Franz M., Bloos F., Ebelt H., Schaller S.J., et al. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) reliably stratifies octogenarians in German ICUs: A multicentre prospective cohort study. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:162. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0847-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim H.S., Wu Y., Lin S.J., Deerochanawong C., Zambahari R., Zhao L., Zhang Q., Yan P. Current status of cholesterol goal attainment after statin therapy among patients with hypercholesterolemia in Asian countries and region: The Return on Expenditure Achieved for Lipid Therapy in Asia (REALITY-Asia) study. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2008;24:1951–1963. doi: 10.1185/03007990802138731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chiang C.E., Ferrières J., Gotcheva N.N., Raal F.J., Shehab A., Sung J., Henriksson K.M., Hermans M.P. Suboptimal Control of Lipid Levels: Results from 29 Countries Participating in the Centralized Pan-Regional Surveys on the Undertreatment of Hypercholesterolaemia (CEPHEUS) J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2016;23:567–587. doi: 10.5551/jat.31179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Xanthopoulou I., Davlouros P., Siahos S., Perperis A., Zaharioglou E., Alexopoulos D. First-line treatment patterns and lipid target levels attainment in very high cardiovascular risk outpatients. Lipids Health Dis. 2013;12:170. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kauffman A.B., Olson K.L., Youngblood M.L., Zadvorny E.B., Delate T., Merenich J.A. Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in coronary artery disease. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2010;4:173–180. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2010.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Karalis D.G., Victor B., Ahedor L., Liu L. Use of Lipid-Lowering Medications and the Likelihood of Achieving Optimal LDL-Cholesterol Goals in Coronary Artery Disease Patients. Cholesterol. 2012;2012:861924. doi: 10.1155/2012/861924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Karp I., Chen S.-F., Pilote L. Sex differences in the effectiveness of statins after myocardial infarction. CMAJ Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2007;176:333–338. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mombelli G., Bosisio R., Calabresi L., Magni P., Pavanello C., Pazzucconi F., Sirtori C.R. Gender-related lipid and/or lipoprotein responses to statins in subjects in primary and secondary prevention. J. Clin. Lipidol. 2015;9:226–233. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2014.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.MOH . National Survey of Risk Factors of NCDs in Vietnam. Ministry of Health; Hanoi, Vietnam: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Van Minh H., Giang K.B., Ngoc N.B., Hai P.T., Huyen D.T., Khue L.N., Lam N.T., Nga P.T., Quan N.T., Xuyen N.T. Prevalence of tobacco smoking in Vietnam: Findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2015. Int. J. Public Health. 2017;62((Suppl. S1)):121–129. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0955-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yudi M.B., Farouque O., Andrianopoulos N., Ajani A.E., Kalten K., Brennan A.L., Lefkovits J., Hiew C., Oqueli E., Reid C.M., et al. The prognostic significance of smoking cessation after acute coronary syndromes: An observational, multicentre study from the Melbourne interventional group registry. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016874. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lovatt S., Wong C.W., Holroyd E., Butler R., Phan T., Patwala A., Loke Y.K., Mallen C.D., Kwok C.S. Smoking cessation after acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021;75:e14894. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The study data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.