INTRODUCTION
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has seen the rapid development and deployment of new vaccines and vaccine technologies. One of the latter involves the use of nanoparticle or virus-like particle (VLP) technologies, with the display of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the S1 domain, or the receptor-binding domain (RBD) on VLPs or nanoparticles providing immunogenic COVID-19 vaccines (1). We previously described a two-component nanoparticle vaccine based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 domain (2). Correctly folded and highly glycosylated S1 (strain Wuhan) was expressed in Spodoptera frugiperda (ExpiSf9) insect cells using the well-established baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS), with S1 displayed on bacteriophage AP205 capsid-like nanoparticles via a tag-catcher covalent bond (2) (Fig. 1A). This S1-VLP nanoparticle vaccine was immunogenic at a 0.5-μg dose (formulated with Addavax adjuvant) in BALB/c mice. A related vaccine, ABNCoV2, confers protection in rhesus macaques (3) and is currently in stage III clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05329220) and comprises the RBD displayed on the AP205 nanoparticles (4). The AP205 nanoparticles encapsulate bacterial RNA, which provides adjuvanting activity via engagement of Toll-like receptors 7 and 8 (TLR7/8) (4).
FIG 1.
Vaccination and challenge of K18-hACE2 mice. (A) Vaccine-comprised S1 protein coupled onto AP205 nanoparticles by tag-catcher covalent isopeptide bond. (B) Experimental timeline. K18-hACE2 mice (n = 6/group) were vaccinated with two doses of 2 μg S1-VLP, 2 μg S1 subunit, 50 μL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), 1 μg BNT162b2, or 5 μg BNT162b2. Time of challenge, blood collection, clinical disease score monitoring, and viral load determinations are indicated. (C) Serum was collected after each vaccination and neutralizing titers determined. Limit of detection, 1 in 20 dilution of serum. (D) Clinical disease scores were monitored for posture, activity, and fur ruffling (means are shown). (E) Mean percentage weight change per group after challenge relative to the mice’s weight on day 0. P values shown for S1-VLP versus S1 or PBS on days 4 and 5. (F) On day 5 postchallenge, SARS-CoV-2 viral titers in lungs, nasal turbinates, and brains were determined. Each dot represents a single mouse in panels C and F. In panels D and E, the average scores per group are shown. Statistics throughout by Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests.
We have now undertaken a vaccination and challenge study in K18-hACE2 transgenic mice (Fig. 1B), which provide a robust and lethal model of SARS-CoV-2 infection (5–7); ethics statements and regulatory compliance and detailed methods are available in Rawle et al. (8). Female K18-hACE2 mice (n = 6/group) received two intramuscular vaccinations 5 weeks apart with 2 μg S1 (no adjuvant), 2 μg S1-VLP (no adjuvant), or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). As positive controls, mice were double vaccinated with 1 μg or 5 μg of the licensed SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2; Pfizer-BioNTech) (9); we used the discarded remnant in the multi-dose vial after 6 doses had been used to vaccinate humans. Serum-neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers were quantified (8) after the first and second immunizations (Fig. 1C). The S1 subunit vaccine did not induce detectable nAb titers. In contrast, mice vaccinated with S1-VLP and BNT162b2 produced robust nAb titers that increased substantially after the second vaccination (Fig. 1C). The responses induced by S1-VLP vaccination were not significantly different from those induced by 1 μg BNT162b2, but were significantly lower than those induced by 5 μg BNT162b2 (Fig. 1C).
At 11 weeks after the first vaccination (Fig. 1B), the mice received an intrapulmonary challenge delivered intranasally with 5 × 104 50% cell culture infectious dose (CCID50)/mouse (in 50 μL) SARS-CoV-2 UK strain, B1.1.7; hCoV-19/Australia/QLD1517/2021 (10), and disease scores (quantitating overt clinical signs [6]) and weight change were monitored over 5 days. Mice that received the S1 subunit vaccine or PBS developed clear signs of disease (Fig. 1D) and showed significant weight loss (Fig. 1E). Mice vaccinated with the S1-VLP vaccine or BNT162b2 were fully protected from signs of disease (Fig. 1D) and weight loss (Fig. 1E). At 5 days postchallenge, SARS-CoV-2 tissue titers were determined in the lungs, nasal turbinates, and brains (8). Vaccination with S1-VLP and BNT162b2 vaccines significantly reduced the viral loads in these target organs, although one S1-VLP-vaccinated mouse was not fully protected against detectable virus (Fig. 1F).
These data show that our previously described two-component nanoparticle vaccine S1-VLP (2) provides protective immunity in mice against SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease without a requirement for additional adjuvants. In contrast, the S1 subunit vaccine, not conjugated to nanoparticles, provided no significant protection. The S1-VLP vaccine induced neutralizing antibody responses that were comparable with those induced by 1 μg BNT162b2. This VLP display platform should theoretically be readily amendable to any (or even multiple) SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was funded through European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 101003608) and conducted in the H2020 Prevent-nCoV consortium. A.S. holds an Investigator grant from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1173880).
We thank our collaborators at Bioprocess Engineering and the Laboratory of Biochemistry for their help and advice in producing the S1 protein. We thank the Brazil Family Foundation and Clive Berghofer (and many others) for their generous philanthropic donations to support SARS-CoV-2 BSL3 (PC3) research at QIMR Berghofer MRI. We thank Alyssa Pyke (Queensland Health) for providing the virus.
A.F.S. and M.A.N. are listed as coinventors on a patent covering the AP205 CLP vaccine platform technology (WO2016112921 A1) licensed to AdaptVac, and C.F., A.F.S., L.G., and W.A.D.J. are employees at this company. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Contributor Information
Andreas Suhrbier, Email: andreas.suhrbier@qimrberghofer.edu.au.
Mark T. Heise, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
REFERENCES
- 1.Kim C, Kim JD, Seo SU. 2022. Nanoparticle and virus-like particle vaccine approaches against SARS-CoV-2. J Microbiol 60:335–346. 10.1007/s12275-022-1608-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.van Oosten L, Altenburg JJ, Fougeroux C, Geertsema C, van den End F, Evers WAC, Westphal AH, Lindhoud S, van den Berg W, Swarts DC, Deurhof L, Suhrbier A, Le TT, Torres Morales S, Myeni SK, Kikkert M, Sander AF, de Jongh WA, Dagil R, Nielsen MA, Salanti A, Sogaard M, Keijzer TMP, Weijers D, Eppink MHM, Wijffels RH, van Oers MM, Martens DE, Pijlman GP. 2021. Two-component nanoparticle vaccine displaying glycosylated spike S1 domain induces neutralizing antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 variants. mBio 12:e0181321. 10.1128/mBio.01813-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Volkmann A, Koopman G, Mooij P, Verschoor EJ, Verstrepen BE, Bogers W, Idorn M, Paludan SR, Vang S, Nielsen MA, Sander AF, Schmittwolf C, Hochrein H, Chaplin P. 2022. A capsid virus-like particle-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induces high levels of antibodies and protects rhesus macaques. Front Immunol 13:857440. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.857440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fougeroux C, Goksøyr L, Idorn M, Soroka V, Myeni SK, Dagil R, Janitzek CM, Søgaard M, Aves K-L, Horsted EW, Erdoğan SM, Gustavsson T, Dorosz J, Clemmensen S, Fredsgaard L, Thrane S, Vidal-Calvo EE, Khalifé P, Hulen TM, Choudhary S, Theisen M, Singh SK, Garcia-Senosiain A, Van Oosten L, Pijlman G, Hierzberger B, Domeyer T, Nalewajek BW, Strøbæk A, Skrzypczak M, Andersson LF, Buus S, Buus AS, Christensen JP, Dalebout TJ, Iversen K, Harritshøj LH, Mordmüller B, Ullum H, Reinert LS, de Jongh WA, Kikkert M, Paludan SR, Theander TG, Nielsen MA, Salanti A, Sander AF. 2021. Capsid-like particles decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 receptor-binding domain elicit strong virus neutralization activity. Nat Commun 12:324. 10.1038/s41467-020-20251-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Amarilla AA, Sng JDJ, Parry R, Deerain JM, Potter JR, Setoh YX, Rawle DJ, Le TT, Modhiran N, Wang X, Peng NYG, Torres FJ, Pyke A, Harrison JJ, Freney ME, Liang B, McMillan CLD, Cheung STM, Guevara D, Hardy JM, Bettington M, Muller DA, Coulibaly F, Moore F, Hall RA, Young PR, Mackenzie JM, Hobson-Peters J, Suhrbier A, Watterson D, Khromykh AA. 2021. A versatile reverse genetics platform for SARS-CoV-2 and other positive-strand RNA viruses. Nat Commun 12:3431. 10.1038/s41467-021-23779-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bishop CR, Dumenil T, Rawle DJ, Le TT, Yan K, Tang B, Hartel G, Suhrbier A. 2022. Mouse models of COVID-19 recapitulate inflammatory pathways rather than gene expression. bioRxiv 10.1101/2022.02.24.481866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Guimond SE, Mycroft-West CJ, Gandhi NS, Tree JA, Le TT, Spalluto CM, Humbert MV, Buttigieg KR, Coombes N, Elmore MJ, Wand M, Nyström K, Said J, Setoh YX, Amarilla AA, Modhiran N, Sng JDJ, Chhabra M, Young PR, Rawle DJ, Lima MA, Yates EA, Karlsson R, Miller RL, Chen Y-H, Bagdonaite I, Yang Z, Stewart J, Nguyen D, Laidlaw S, Hammond E, Dredge K, Wilkinson TMA, Watterson D, Khromykh AA, Suhrbier A, Carroll MW, Trybala E, Bergström T, Ferro V, Skidmore MA, Turnbull JE. 2022. Synthetic heparan sulfate mimetic pixatimod (PG545) potently inhibits SARS-CoV-2 by disrupting the spike–ACE2 interaction. ACS Cent Sci 8:527–545. 10.1021/acscentsci.1c01293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rawle DJ, Le TT, Dumenil T, Yan K, Tang B, Nguyen W, Watterson D, Modhiran N, Hobson-Peters J, Bishop C, Suhrbier A. 2021. ACE2-lentiviral transduction enables mouse SARS-CoV-2 infection and mapping of receptor interactions. PLoS Pathog 17:e1009723. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Polack FP, Thomas SJ, Kitchin N, Absalon J, Gurtman A, Lockhart S, Perez JL, Perez Marc G, Moreira ED, Zerbini C, Bailey R, Swanson KA, Roychoudhury S, Koury K, Li P, Kalina WV, Cooper D, Frenck RW, Jr., Hammitt LL, Tureci O, Nell H, Schaefer A, Unal S, Tresnan DB, Mather S, Dormitzer PR, Sahin U, Jansen KU, Gruber WC, Group CCT, C4591001 Clinical Trial Group . 2020. Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. N Engl J Med 383:2603–2615. 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pyke AT, Nair N, van den Hurk AF, Burtonclay P, Nguyen S, Barcelon J, Kistler C, Schlebusch S, McMahon J, Moore F. 2021. Replication kinetics of B.1.351 and B.1.1.7 SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern including assessment of a B.1.1.7 mutant carrying a defective ORF7a gene. Viruses 13:1087. 10.3390/v13061087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

