Abstract
Multiple studies have established associations between human gut bacteria and host physiology, but determining the molecular mechanisms underlying these associations has been challenging1–3. Akkermansia muciniphila has been robustly associated with positive systemic effects on host metabolism, favourable outcomes to checkpoint blockade in cancer immunotherapy and homeostatic immunity4–7. Here we report the identification of a lipid from A. muciniphila’s cell membrane that recapitulates the immunomodulatory activity of A. muciniphila in cell-based assays8. The isolated immunogen, a diacyl phosphatidylethanolamine with two branched chains (a15:0-i15:0 PE), was characterized through both spectroscopic analysis and chemical synthesis. The immunogenic activity of a15:0-i15:0 PE has a highly restricted structure–activity relationship, and its immune signalling requires an unexpected toll-like receptor TLR2–TLR1 heterodimer9,10. Certain features of the phospholipid’s activity are worth noting: it is significantly less potent than known natural and synthetic TLR2 agonists; it preferentially induces some inflammatory cytokines but not others; and, at low doses (1% of EC50) it resets activation thresholds and responses for immune signalling. Identifying both the molecule and an equipotent synthetic analogue, its non-canonical TLR2–TLR1 signalling pathway, its immunomodulatory selectivity and its low-dose immunoregulatory effects provide a molecular mechanism for a model of A. muciniphila’s ability to set immunological tone and its varied roles in health and disease.
Subject terms: Bacterial host response, Biochemistry
Overall, this study describes the molecular mechanism of a druggable pathway that recapitulates in cellular assays the immunomodulatory effects associated with Akkermansia muciniphila, a prominent member of the gut microbiota.
Main
There are numerous correlations between gut microbes and host responses, but the responsible molecules and mechanisms are largely unknown1–3. Akkermansia muciniphila, a recently discovered member of the gut microbiome, appears prominently in these correlations11. This Gram-negative obligate anaerobe comprises approximately 3% of healthy human gut populations and is primarily known as a phylogenetic outlier that degrades intestinal mucin, the mucus layer separating the epithelial cells forming the intestinal wall from the intestine’s contents12. Its abundance is inversely correlated with inflammatory bowel disease and type 2 diabetes, but positively correlated with responses to programmed cell-death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell-death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors in cancer immunotherapy6,7,13. These correlations gained additional importance when a recent report identified A. muciniphila’s unusual ability to induce intestinal adaptive immune responses during homeostasis in a subset of T cells5.
In an earlier study to identify immunoregulatory small molecules from gut microbes, we used an unbiased functional assay using cytokine release from murine bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells (mBMDCs) in response to fractionated bacterial extracts8. Dendritic cells, which are part of the innate immune system, detect pathogen-associated molecules and relay information to the adaptive immune system through the release of cytokines. We reasoned that the same approach would identify immunogens produced by A. muciniphila.
To conduct a comprehensive survey for immunogens, both the cell pellet and supernatant from A. muciniphila BAA-835 cultures were assayed for their ability to induce cytokine release from mBMDCs (Fig. 1a)8. The crude lipid fraction from a small initial culture produced significant TNFα (tumour necrosis factor A) induction (Fig. 1b). Large-scale culturing (128 l) led to a combined lipid extract (19 g), which, upon further chromatographic separations with normal- and reversed-phase chromatography, led to a single active fraction with robust TNFα induction (Fig. 1a). The active fraction was a mixture of closely related molecules with a major component (15 mg) (Fig. 1b). Mass spectroscopic analysis indicated a molecular formula of C35H71NO8P, suggesting a phospholipid, and preliminary 13C and 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analysis identified a phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), the dominant membrane phospholipid in most bacteria14. PEs have a glycerol core, a polar phosphoethanolamine head group at the sn-3 position, and two fatty-acid (FA) esters attached to the sn-1 and sn-2 positions (Fig. 1c). Additional NMR analysis revealed that both chains had methyl branches (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 1). One acyl chain had a terminal iso branch, and the other had a terminal anteiso branch, meaning that the methyl groups were on positions 12 and 13 of a 14-carbon FA chain (Fig. 1c). The order of the acyl groups was determined by selective hydrolysis to preferentially liberate the FA attached at the sn-2 position. The active molecule’s chemical name is 12-methyltetradecanoyl-13-methyltetradecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, which is a15:0-i15:0 PE in standard lipid nomenclature. We did not find producers of a15:0-i15:0 PE in frequently encountered gut microbes nor in gut microbes with reported immunomodulatory effects2. Membrane lipids reflect both evolutionary history and current environment. A. muciniphila, the only member of verrucomicrobia in the gut microbiota, is a phylogenetic outlier specialized for life in the mucin layer. Metabolomic analysis, phylogenetic placement and a distinctive microenvironment all support a singular association of A. muciniphila with a15:0-i15:0 PE.
The active fraction contained all the PEs produced by A. muciniphila; the later eluting fractions were triglycerides and the earlier eluting fractions were diacylglycerides with different head groups. The PE FAs were dominated (92%) by relatively short, branched-chain fatty acids (BCFAs): a15:0 (52%), i15:0 (24%) and i14:0 (16%) (Fig. 1d). Small amounts of a17:0 and i16:0 were also present. Bacteria make BCFAs to increase membrane fluidity, the same function unsaturated FAs have in animals15. Anteiso FAs increase fluidity more than iso FAs and iso FAs increase fluidity over normal FAs16. BCFAs are common in bacteria, including many pathogens, but they can be produced by humans at low levels17. Interestingly, BCFAs in human serum, independent of a connection with A. muciniphila or any other bacteria, have been strongly associated with human health, especially an anticorrelation with developing type 2 diabetes18,19.
The active compound (a15:0-i15:0 PE) was the major component (approximately 50%) of A. muciniphila’s lipid membrane and had a robust dose–response curve for induction of TNFα (Fig. 1e). In addition to dramatically upregulating TNFα release, it promoted the release of IL-6 (interleukin 6), but not IL-10 or IL-12p70 (Fig. 1f and Extended Data Fig. 2). Dendritic cells typically respond to bacterial metabolites through the pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP) receptors, toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)9,20. Receptor specificity was established by generating mBMDCs from both tlr2−/− and tlr4−/− mice and using them along with wild-type cells in the cytokine induction assay8. PEs active in wild-type cell assays produced no TNFα induction in mBMDCs from tlr2−/− mice but showed robust TNFα induction in mBMDCs generated from tlr4−/− mice (Fig. 1g). Previous reports attributed A. muciniphila’s immunomodulatory activity to a membrane-associated protein (Amuc_1100) signalling through TLR221,22. Additional publications supporting the protein’s role in maintaining the intestinal mucosal barrier have also appeared23. Even though a15:0-i15:0 PE was the only active molecule detected in our study, other immunomodulatory contributors are a distinct possibility24.
With the identification of a15:0-i15:0 PE as an immunomodulatory molecule and TLR2 as its cognate receptor, we examined the pathway and regulation of PE biosynthesis by A. muciniphila and the laboratory synthesis of a15:0-i15:0 PE (Fig. 2). Bacterial PE biosynthesis has three distinct stages (Fig. 2a)25. In the first stage, the branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) isoleucine (Ile), leucine (Leu) and valine (Val) are converted to branched-chain carboxylic acids by the branched-chain alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase complex (BCKDH)25. These acids are shuttled into the FA synthase (FAS) cycle by FabH (3-oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier-protein] synthase 3) where they become the tail end of an FA chain through the repetitive addition of two-carbon units25. After elongation, the BCFAs are added to the sn-1 and sn-2 positions of glycerol-3-phosphate by the enzymes PlsB and PlsC, respectively. The composition of PEs is regulated by numerous factors from the availability of BCAAs to the selectivity of PlsB and PlsC. Finally, the phosphate head group is elaborated into a PE head group25. The A. muciniphila genome has genes that encode the enzymes for every step of the BCAA to PE pathway just described (Extended Data Fig. 3). In addition, A. muciniphila has the genes for the de novo synthesis of BCAAs from glucose (Extended Data Fig. 4). The general pathway outlined above is supported by feeding experiments (Fig. 2b). Lipid extracts from A. muciniphila grown in minimal media supplemented with Leu and/or Ile used to treat mBMDCs led to significant increases in TNFα release in a TLR2-dependent fashion. Experiments in rich (brain heart infusion (BHI)) media showed similar but smaller increases.
We synthesized candidate PEs to independently confirm our identification, provide additional material for biological testing, eliminate the possibility of natural contaminants and explore structure–activity relationships (SARs). The synthesis, which is outlined in Fig. 2c, began with a commercially available protected chiral glycerol. With the future sn-2 and sn-3 positions blocked, the future sn-3 position was converted to a protected phosphate. The hydroxyl groups at sn-2 and sn-3 were deprotected, and the acyl groups were added in a stepwise fashion, taking advantage of the greater reactivity at the sn-1 position to install this acyl chain first. The a15:0 carboxylic acid used in the synthesis had the stereochemistry appropriate for natural Ile. The synthetic a15:0-i15:0 PE had identical spectroscopic, chromatographic and biological properties to the natural molecule (Figs. 1e and 2d,e).
In addition to confirming the order of the acyl chains and two stereochemical issues, the synthetic scheme allowed a small library of natural and synthetic FAs and diacyl PEs to be assembled. The library was assayed to establish a preliminary SAR for the A. muciniphila lipids and their component parts. First, we established that FAs only activate TLR2 in the context of a diacyl PE, as none has any detectable activity on its own (Extended Data Fig. 5). This result is consistent with the tlr2−/− mBMDC analysis (Fig. 1g). The diacyl PE library members revealed a surprisingly strict set of structural requirements (Fig. 2e): (1) methyl branches are essential for TNFα induction, as the three PE analogues where both acyl groups have straight chains (n14:0, n15:0 and n16:0) had no detectable activity; (2) the two acyl chains must be different, as a15:0-a15:0 PE and i15:0-i15:0 PE had no detectable activity; and (3) positional order appears to play a minor role, as a15:0-i15:0 PE and i15:0-a15:0 PE were essentially equipotent. We did not detect i15:0-a15:0 PE in natural samples.
SAR studies on TLR2 ligands invariably focus on the head group that protrudes from the membrane-bound receptor. The conventional view of TLR2 signalling relegates the lipid chains to providing hydrophobic anchors for a protruding head group that regulates receptor activation9,26,27. This view is supported by several structural studies on TLR2 receptors with bound ligand and SAR studies26,28,29. The extracellular part of TLR2 is a horseshoe-shaped, leucine-rich repeat with a long hydrophobic tunnel that binds two acyl chains (Fig. 3a,b). TLR2 typically requires formation of a heterodimer with either TLR1 or TLR6 for immune signalling9,28,29. CRISPR–Cas knockdowns of TLR6 and TLR1 showed that a TLR2–TLR1 heterodimer is required for TNFα induction, which is a surprising result for a diacyl lipid (Fig. 3a,c)9,28,29. The requirement for a non-canonical TLR2–TLR1 heterodimer indicates that the two acyl chains of a15:0-i15:0 PE occupy binding pockets in two different proteins, one in TLR2 and one in TLR1, forming an atypical signalling heterodimer with a buried head group (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Video 1). There are other TLR2 agonists that form TLR2–TLR1 heterodimers, and at least two of them (the synthetic molecules diprovocim and CU-T12-9) were developed as adjuvants for cancer immunotherapy, whereas another (polysaccharide A from Bacteroides fragilis) is produced by a member of the gut microbiome and associated with IL-10 production30–33. There is an important difference in potency between the synthetic agonists and a15:0-i15:0 PE: EC50 values of pmol l−1 versus µmol l−1. A similar difference in immunogenicity has been noted in a study of immunomodulatory sphingolipids from B. fragilis24.
To complete this initial phase of our study, we sought to connect the active lipids from A. muciniphila to the selective cytokine responses of specific human immune cell lineages5. Human monocytes purified from peripheral blood were cultured and stimulated with natural and synthetic TLR2 agonists for 6 h, after which mRNA was extracted and sequenced (Extended Data Fig. 6). The a15:0-i15:0 PE induced pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and IL-6 comparably with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and Pam3CSK4, albeit at higher doses, but was significantly less effective at inducing IL-23, a heterodimer of IL-23A and IL-12B (Figs. 1f and 3d and Extended Data Figs. 2 and 6). The IL-23/T-helper-17 cell (Th17) immune axis is a major inflammatory pathway, and its therapeutic regulation is an important research target34.
Next, we investigated the effects of a15:0-i15:0 PE on other immunogens by treating human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (which were differentiated by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and IL-4) with a15:0-i15:0 PE and the model agonists Pam3CSK4 (to stimulate TLR2–TLR1) and LPS (to stimulate TLR4). Variables were dose, duration (6 h or 21 h) and timing (cotreatment or sequential treatment). A particularly informative set of data came from the 21 h sequential treatment study in which a low dose of a15:0-i15:0 PE (0.15 µmol l−1, approximately 1% of EC50) was followed 18 h later by the addition of known agonists. This treatment regimen completely suppressed TNFα release (Fig. 3e and Extended Data Fig. 7). The suppressive effect was not seen with shorter periods between the lipid and agonist treatments (6 h and co-stimulation studies) nor with higher doses of lipid (Fig. 3f,g and Extended Data Fig. 7). These results support a model in which low doses of a15:0-i15:0 PE and delayed stimulation reset the cellular activation threshold and moderate other cellular immune responses, as indicated by the LPS response, which was reduced but not in a lipid-dependent fashion (Fig. 3e). Low dose and delayed stimulation reflect likely in vivo conditions. Larger doses and shorter times produce the expected dose-dependent response (Figs. 1e and 3f,g and Extended Data Fig. 7).
Conclusion
Since its discovery, multiple lines of investigation have indicated that A. muciniphila plays a considerable role in regulating human immune responses in a variety of contexts4–7. Our study indicates that A. muciniphila’s immunomodulatory activity can be replicated by a diacyl PE, a15:0-i15:0 PE, a lipid that is not noticeably different from other diacyl PEs forming the cell membranes of most bacteria found in the human gut14. Because of its generic structure, its remarkable activity would not have been easily identified by genomic or metabolomic analyses. It agonizes a non-canonical TLR2–TLR1 heterodimer to release a subset of inflammatory cytokines9,26,35. The potency of TLR2 heterodimers is conventionally thought to be governed by a peptide, peptide-like or (poly)saccharide moiety emerging from the dimer interface, and the absence of this chain in a15:0-i15:0 PE might be responsible for the molecule’s unusual immunomodulatory effects (Figs. 1e and 3b)26,30,32. Although there is still much to be learned about the pharmacology of a15:0-i15:0 PE, the existing data support a model in which repeated low-level stimulation of the TLR2–TLR1 signalling pathway resets the activation threshold so that weak signals are ignored and strong signals are moderated, thereby contributing to homeostatic immunity36,37. It is also important to note that the data underlying the model are from in vitro studies and in vivo studies will be needed to fully validate it. Overall, this study describes the molecular mechanism of a druggable pathway that recapitulates in cellular assays the immunomodulatory effects associated with a prominent member of the gut microbiota.
Methods
Bacterial cultivation and extraction of metabolites
A. muciniphila BAA-835 was inoculated in 3 ml of BHI medium in a 5 ml Falcon tube and incubated under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 4 days. Then, 3 ml of the culture was used to inoculate 1 l of BHI medium with 1.5 g of mucin from porcine stomach (Sigma-Aldrich), in a 1 l Pyrex storage bottle (16 bottles × 1 l each, total volume 16 l) and the cultures were incubated for 12 days under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C. After 12 days of static growth, bacterial cultures were centrifuged to separate cell pellets and supernatants (8,000 r.p.m. for 30 min). The cell pellets were extracted with chloroform and methanol (1:1) by stirring for 24 h at room temperature. The solvent mixture was filtered through Whatman qualitative filter paper (grade 3, circle, diameter 125 mm) and dried under vacuum.
For the extraction of supernatants, 100 g of hydrophobic resin mixture (Amberlite XAD4HP and XAD7HP, 20–60 mesh) was added directly to spent media to allow secreted metabolites to adsorb to the resins. Then, the resin mixture containing bacterial metabolites was washed with acetone and methanol (1:1) and stirred for 24 h at room temperature. The solvent mixture with resin mixture was filtered through Whatman qualitative filter paper (grade 3, circle, diameter 125 mm) and concentrated on a rotary evaporator. The cultivation and extraction procedures were repeated eight times (total culture volume, 128 l), yielding 4 g of dry extract from the cell pellets and 15 g of crude extract from the supernatants.
Bioassay-guided fractionation, purification and identification of a15:0-i15:0 PE
The crude extract from the cell pellets (4 g) was dissolved in chloroform and fractionated by normal-phase chromatography using seven different solvent systems (A, 100% hexane; B, 100% chloroform; C, 100% ethyl acetate; D, 75% ethyl acetate/25% methanol; E, 90% acetone/10% methanol; F, 50% methanol/50% dichloromethane; and G, 100% methanol) with a silica column (Teledyne Isco, RediSep RF Gold Silica 12 g). The pro-inflammatory activity was highly detected in fractions F and G. The mixture of fractions F and G (120 mg and 210 mg, respectively, and 8.3% of total yield) was then subjected to reversed-phase semi-preparative high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Luna C8 (2), 250 × 10 mm, 5 µm) using the following gradient solvent system: 10% methanol/90% water isocratic for 10 min; gradient to 30% methanol/70% water for 10 min; then 30% methanol/70% water to 90% methanol/10% water for 20 min, 90% methanol isocratic for 10 min, gradient to 100% methanol for 25 min; flow rate, 2 ml min−1). Fractions were collected every 1 min between 5 min and 75 min, generating 70 fractions. Fractions able to stimulate pro-inflammatory cytokine production from mBMDCs were combined and identified as bacterial PE with BCFAs (22 mg, yield = 0.55%). An essentially pure compound, later identified as a15:0-i15:0 PE, was acquired at a retention time of 63 min (14 mg, yield = 0.35%).
The crude extract from the supernatants (15 g) was dissolved in methanol and filtered through a syringe filter (polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), 0.2 µm). The filtered extract was directly injected onto a reversed-phase preparative HPLC column (Luna C18 (2), 250 × 21.2 mm, 5 µm) with a gradient mobile solution (30% methanol/70% water to 100% methanol for 30 min, 100% methanol isocratic for 30 min; flow rate, 10 ml min−1). Fractions were collected every 2 min from 5 min to 55 min, generating 25 fractions. Fractions able to stimulate pro-inflammatory cytokine production from mBMDCs were collected at 50 min (23.5 mg, 0.16%) and further purified as described above, resulting in additional a15:0-i15:0 (1.2 mg, yield = 0.008%). Overall, 15.2 mg of a15:0-i15:0 was isolated from 19.0 g of crude extract (0.08%).
The structure of a15:0-i15:0 PE was identified by the comprehensive analysis of 1H, 13C and two-dimensional (2D) NMR spectroscopic data (Extended Data Table 1).
Extended Data Table 1.
1H and 13C NMR data (500 MHz) of a15:0-i15:0 PE in CDCl3.
NMR spectroscopy
All 1H NMR spectra were acquired at 500 MHz at 30 °C, and chemical shifts are represented on a δ (beta) scale. Residual protium in the NMR solvent (CDCl3, δ 7.26) was used to reference chemical shifts. Data are represented as follows: assignment, chemical shift, integration, multiplicity (s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; m, multiplet; br, broad) and coupling constant in hertz. All 13C NMR spectra were obtained at 125 MHz at 30 °C and chemical shifts are represented on a δ scale. The carbon resonances of the NMR solvent (CDCl3, δ 77.17) were used to reference chemical shifts. Full assignment of protons and carbons were completed on the basis of the following 2D NMR spectroscopy experiments: gradient 1H–1H correlation spectroscopy, gradient 1H–13C heteronuclear single quantum coherence, gradient 1H–13C heteronuclear multiple bond connectivity. Mnova v.14.2.0 was used to analyse NMR data of natural and synthetic compounds.
High-resolution mass spectrometry for a15:0-i15:0 PE and other family members
High-resolution mass spectrometry data were collected using Agilent MassHunter Work Station LC/MS Data Acquisition 10.1 and Agilent LC-QTOF Mass Spectrometer 6530 equipped with a 1290 uHPLC system and electrospray ionization detector scanning from m/z 50 to 3,200. Then 5 μl aliquots of a15:0-i15:0 PE and its family members were injected into a reversed-phase analytical column (Luna C8: 100 × 2.1 mm, 5 μm) using a gradient solvent system with 0.1% formic acid (10% methanol/water to 90% methanol/water for 10 min, 90% methanol/water isocratic for 10 min, then gradient to 100% for 10 min; flow rate, 0.3 ml). Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis B.07.00 software was used to analyse the data.
FA methyl esterification and GC–MS analysis of A. muciniphila PE
A 0.1 mg sample of both a15:0-i15:0 PE and complete A. muciniphila PE were dissolved in 200 μl of methanol, and 1.4 mg of sodium methoxide was added to prepare a 0.5 mol l−1 sodium methoxide solution. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 3 h then quenched by addition of 1N HCl. The methanolysis products were dried under vacuum and extracted with ethyl acetate and water (300 μl, v/v = 2:1). The water layers were removed, and each of the ethyl acetate layers containing FA methyl esters (FAME) were injected into a gas chromatograph (GC, Agilent MassHunter GC/MS Acquisition B.07.05.2479) combined with a HP-5 ms Ultra Inert column (0.25 mm × 30 m). The temperature of the injector and the detector in the GC was maintained at 150 °C. During analysis, the temperature of the GC column was controlled (150 °C for 3 min, 150–250 °C at 6 °C min−1 and 250 °C for 3 min). The FAME derivatives of a15:0-i15:0 PE were composed of i15:0 and a15:0 (1:1 ratio) having retention times at 10.2 min and 9.7 min, respectively. The gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis of FAME derivatives of AmPE displayed i14:0 (15.7%), n14:0 (2.7%), a15:0 (51.7%), i15:0 (23.6%), a16:0 (0.6%), i16:0 (1.8%), a17:0 (1.7%) and a18:0 (2.2%), having retention times at 8.0, 8.6, 9.7, 10.2, 11.3, 11.9, 13.4 and 15.0 min, respectively (Fig. 1d). Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis B.07.00 software was used to analyse GC–MS data.
O-deacylation for determination of a15:0 connected to sn-1
A 5 mg sample of a15:0-i15:0 PE was prepared and lyophilized for 24 h. A 1 mg ml−1 of NaOMe solution was prepared, and the mixture was dissolved in 500 μl of NaOMe solution at room temperature. The solution was stirred under argon for 30 min. After 30 min, the reaction was quenched by addition of 1N HCl and dried under vacuum. The O-deacylated product, a15:0 PE, was purified by reversed-phase HPLC (Luna C8 (2): 250 × 10 mm, 5 μm) with an isocratic solvent system (45% acetonitrile/water over 30 min, ultraviolet 210 nm detection, flow rate 2 ml min−1). The O-deacylated product (1.8 mg) was eluted at 12.5 min, and its structure was determined by one-dimensional and/or 2D NMR spectroscopy (Extended Data Table 2) and by low-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) ([M+H]+ m/z at 440; molecular formula, C20H43NO7P).
Extended Data Table 2.
1H and 13C NMR data (500 MHz) of a15:0 PE in CD3OD.
Amino-acid feeding experiment
A volume of 5 ml of A. muciniphila BAA-835 grown in BHI was inoculated into three 1 l bottles of M9 medium supplemented with 1.5 g of mucin from porcine stomach (Sigma-Aldric) and either 1 mmol l−1 of l-leucine, l-isoleucine or l-leucine/l-isoleucine mixture (1:1 ratio) or nothing as a control. The cultures were grown under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 12 days. The cell pellets from these cultures were centrifuged and extracted with 40 ml of chloroform and methanol (1:1). The extract was dried under vacuum and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at a 10 mg ml−1 concentration and tested for activity in the mBMDC cytokine assay. Statistical significances were determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test.
a15:0-i15:0 PE biosynthetic gene identification and analysis
Sequence comparison and analysis of the a15:0-i15:0 PE biosynthetic pathway to the previously reported BCFA biosynthetic pathway and de novo biosynthetic pathway of leucine, isoleucine and valine were performed using blastp (NCBI RefSeq database, updated 8 September 2015), Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes and Geneious v.11.1.4 for pairwise sequence alignments that were previously reported. The accession number for the genes used in this analysis is CP001071.1.
Total synthesis for small library of PEs
The total synthesis of a15:0-i15:0 PE, i15:0-a15:0 PE, a15:0-a15:0 PE, i15:0-i15:0 PE and n15:0-n15:0 PE was performed by previously reported methods38–40.
Animal and human-cell studies
Mouse experimental procedures complied with all relevant ethical regulations and were conducted according to protocol 2003N000158 approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Massachusetts General Hospital. Appropriate sample sizes were estimated based on the effect size and variance of cytokine measurements in myeloid cells stimulated with canonical TLR ligands. In all mouse experiments, animals were allocated to experimental groups based on genotype and/or age and sex matched. Male or female wild-type, TLR2−/− or TLR4−/− C57BL/6 mice at least 3–4-weeks old and preferably 7–12 weeks of age were used. Mice were housed with a 12 h light or dark cycle at an ambient temperature of between 18 °C and 24 °C and a relative humidity of between 30% and 70%.
Human monocytes were isolated from buffy coats collected from healthy donors at the Blood Donor Center at Massachusetts General Hospital in compliance with all relevant ethical regulations and according to protocol 2018P001504 approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board. Donors provided informed written consent.
mBMDC cytokine assays
These assays were done as described previously8. In brief, femurs and tibias were collected from male or female wild-type, TLR2−/− or TLR4−/− C57BL/6 mice that were at least 3–4-weeks old and preferably 7–12 weeks of age. The bone marrow was pushed from the bones using a needle and syringe of complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with Gibco GlutaMAX Supplement (35050061), Gibco penicillin-streptomycin (15140122) and 10% heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS), and strained through a 70 µm nylon filter. The collected bone marrow was then centrifuged, and red blood cells were lysed using Invitrogen eBioscience 1X RBC Lysis Buffer (00-4333-57). The cells were then centrifuged and strained through a 70 µm nylon filter again and resuspended in complete DMEM. Cells were counted and then plated at approximately 5 million cells per plate with approximately 20–40 ng ml−1 recombinant murine (Rm) GM-CSF (PreProTech 315-03). They were allowed to grow for 7 days, sometimes with additional feeding of 20–40 ng ml−1 RmGM-CSF on day 3. The resulting mBMDCs were then scraped and counted again. They were plated in 96-well tissue culture-treated microplates (Corning CLS3599) from 50,000–90,000 cells per well and allowed to adhere for at least 3 h. The cells were then treated with chromatographic fractions or purified compounds at a final concentration of 50 µg ml−1, a final concentration of LPS (InvivoGen tlrl-b5lps) of 3–625 ng ml−1 or a final concentration of Pam3CSK4 (InvivoGen tlrl-pms) of 0.250–1.562 µg ml−1 and incubated overnight. The following morning, supernatant was removed and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to measure TNFα using an Invitrogen Mouse ELISA kit (88-7324-77) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Gen5 v.3.03 or SoftMax Pro v.6.2.1 (SpectraMax, Molecular Devices) was used to analyse ELISA plates. For cytokine detection using flow cytometry, we used the cytometric bead array mouse inflammation kit from BD Biosciences (552364) per the manufacturer’s instructions. Data were collected with NovoExpress v.1.4.1 and analysed data using FlowJo v.10.7.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cell cytokine assay
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were enriched for monocytes using the RosetteSepHuman Monocyte Enrichment Cocktail (STEMCELL Technologies, catalogue no. 15028). In brief, buffy coats were incubated with monocyte enrichment cocktail for 20 min at room temperature while rocking. They were then diluted with 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and layered over the Ficoll-Paque PLUS medium (GE Healthcare, catalogue no. 17-1440-02) and centrifuged for 20 min at 1,200g. Enriched monocytes were collected and cultured with chromatographic fractions or purified compounds at 50 µg ml−1 in DMEM media containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin. LPS and Pam3CSK4 at a final concentration of 100 ng ml−1 were used as controls. After overnight incubation, supernatant was collected and analysed for IL-6, IL-10, IL-12/IL-23p40 and TNFα cytokines using Human Flex Set Kits (BD CBA, catalogue nos. 558276, 558274, 560154 and 560112).
RNA sequencing
Monocytes were isolated from PBMCs as described previously41. Bulk RNA sequencing libraries were prepared using SmartSeq2. Libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq (Illumina). FastQC v.0.11.5 and MultiQC v.1.8 were used to confirm the quality of the sequenced libraries42,43. Next, kallisto v.0.46.1 was used with a GRCh38 reference to generate the counts of reads mapped to each gene44,45. The matrix of counts was used for the calculation of counts per million (CPM) values, and the generated CPM matrix was treated with log2(CPM + 1) to obtain a log expression matrix. A gene with a CPM value greater than 1 was considered as expressed. Samples obtained after the above steps were then used to detect differentially expressed genes via EdgeR v.3.35.1 (ref. 44). The lists of differentially expressed genes were generated from likelihood ratio tests based on the generative linear model framework, following the prerequisite gene filtering, normalization and dispersion estimation steps of the software.
CRISPR targeting
PBMCs were isolated from buffy coats using Sepmate tubes (STEMCELL Technologies) and ammonium–chloride–potassium lysis buffer following the manufacturer’s protocol. Human monocytes were harvested from PBMCs by negative selection using RosetteSep human Monocyte Enriched Cocktail (STEMCELL Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Alt-R sgRNAs were purchased from IDT and reconstituted to 100 µmol l−1 with Nuclease-Free Duplex Buffer (IDT). In a sterile polymerase chain reaction strip, the sgRNAs were mixed with Cas9 (IDT, Alt-R S.p. Cas9 Nuclease V3) at a molar ratio of 2:1 (2 µl sgRNA at 100 µmol l−1 + 2 µl Cas9 at 5 mg ml−1) for each reaction and incubated at room temperature for over 20 min. Monocytes were washed twice with 5 ml of PBS and counted. Then 2 × 106 cells per reaction were resuspended in 16 µl of P3 primary nucleofection solution (Lonza). The 16 µl of cells in P3 buffer was added to each Cas9–ribonucleoprotein complex. The cell–ribonucleoprotein mix was then immediately loaded into the supplied nucleofector cassette strip (Lonza) and nucleofected using 4D-Nucleofector with CM-137 programme. Then 180 µl of prewarmed medium was immediately added into each cassette well. A volume of 1 × 105 cells was seeded into a 96-well plate with medium (RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS, 2 mmol l−1 Glutamax, 55 µmol l−1 beta-mercaptoethanol, 100 U ml−1 penicillin, 100 µg ml−1 streptomycin, GM-CSF 800 U ml−1 and IL-4 500 U ml−1). The medium was changed every 2–3 days. At day 5, MDDCs were stimulated with 10 µg ml−1 of Akkermansia lipids, 100 ng ml−1 of Pam3CSK4, 100 ng ml−1 of FSL-1 or 100 ng ml−1 of LPS for 18 h or as indicated. Cell supernatants were collected for human TNFα measurements by ELISA (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. SoftMax Pro v.6.2.1 (SpectraMax, Molecular Devices) was used to analyse ELISA plates. The sgRNA sequences used were as follows:
Human TLR1: GGTCTTAGGAGAGACTTATG
Human TLR2: GACCGCAATGGTATCTGCAA
Human TLR6: ATTCATTTCCGTCGGAGAAC
TLR2–TLR1–a15:0-i15:0 PE complex modelling
Modelling of the a15:0-i15:0 PE ligand complex was based on the crystal structure of the TLR2–TLR1–Pam3CSK4 complex from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 2z7x)28. The Pam3CSK4 ligand was removed from the crystal structure coordinates, and an a15:0-i15:0 PE ligand was prepared using Lidia and AceDRG in Coot v.0.9 (refs. 46,47). The a15:0-i15:0 PE ligand placement in the ligand-binding pockets of TLR2 and TLR1 was guided by the electron density belonging to the acyl chains of the Pam3CSK4 ligand in the crystal structure. Structural figures and videos were generated using ChimeraX v.1.0 (ref. 48). Structural biology software was compiled and configured by SBGrid consortium49.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this paper.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-022-04985-7.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank J. Moore of the Systems Bio FACS core at Harvard Medical School for assistance in setting up experiments. We thank A. Omar, J. Sulca, B. Li and E. Creasey at Massachusetts General Hospital for their assistance with mouse breeding, husbandry and tissue harvesting. We thank E. Helfrich for biosynthetic pathways discussions. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant no. R01AT009708 to J.C. and R.J.X., P30DK043351, R01DK127171, R01AI172147, and RC2DK114784 to R.J.X. and F32AT010415 to C.D.C.) and the Linde Family Programme in Cancer Chemical Biology (to S.J.B.).
Extended data figures and tables
Author contributions
M.B., C.D.C., X.L., J.K., H.V., D.B.G., S.J.B., R.J.X. and J.C. designed the experiments. M.B. and J.K. performed the isolation, purification and characterization in Fig. 1 and Extended Data Fig. 1. M.B. also analysed the genome for the biosynthetic pathways, performed the feeding experiment and conducted the mass spectrometry shown in Fig. 2 and Extended Data Fig. 3 and 4. C.D.C. performed the experiments in Figs. 1 and 2 and Extended Data Fig. 5. X.L. prepared the synthetic a15:0-i15:0 PE and analogues in Fig. 2. B.K.T. and A.S.B. helped perform the experiments shown in Fig. 1 and Extended Data Fig. 2. X.C. S.-M.P. and Z.L. performed the experiments shown in Extended Data Figs. 6 and 7. P.F. performed the structural ligand-binding rendering in Fig. 3. M.B., C.D.C. and J.C. wrote the manuscript. D.B.G and R.J.X. revised and edited the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
RNA sequencing data generated during this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, GSE199367). NMR data generated during this study are available in Extended Data Tables 1 and 2. Complex modelling was based on the crystal structure from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 2z7x). The complete A. muciniphila BAA-835 genome was obtained from GenBank (CP001071.1).
Competing interests
Four of the authors (M.B., C.D.C., R.J.X. and J.C.) have submitted a patent application for materials described in this manuscript. R.J.X. is co-founder of Jnana Therapeutics and Celsius Therapeutics and is a consultant to Nestle; these organizations had no roles in this study. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Munhyung Bae, Chelsi D. Cassilly
Contributor Information
Ramnik J. Xavier, Email: xavier@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu
Jon Clardy, Email: jon_clardy@hms.harvard.edu.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-022-04985-7.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-022-04985-7.
References
- 1.Fan Y, Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:55–71. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0433-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Routy B, et al. The gut microbiota influences anticancer immunosurveillance and general health. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018;15:382–396. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0006-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schmidt TSB, Raes J, Bork P. The human gut microbiome: from association to modulation. Cell. 2018;172:1198–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Depommier C, et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: a proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1096–1103. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ansaldo E, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila induces intestinal adaptive immune responses during homeostasis. Science. 2019;364:1179–1184. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw7479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Routy B, et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science. 2018;359:91–97. doi: 10.1126/science.aan3706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Derosa L, et al. Intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila predicts clinical response to PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Med. 2022;28:315–324. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01655-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Henke MT, et al. Ruminococcus gnavus, a member of the human gut microbiome associated with Crohn’s disease, produces an inflammatory polysaccharide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:12672–12677. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1904099116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kang JY, et al. Recognition of lipopeptide patterns by toll-like receptor 2-toll-like receptor 6 heterodimer. Immunity. 2009;31:873–884. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Takeda K, Akira S. Toll‐like receptors. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2015;109:14.12.1–14.12.10. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im1412s109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cani PD, de Vos WM. Next-generation beneficial microbes: the case of Akkermansia muciniphila. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1765. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Geerlings SY, Kostopoulos I, Vos WMD, Belzer C. Akkermansia muciniphila in the human gastrointestinal tract: when, where, and how? Microorganisms. 2018;6:75. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6030075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Everard A, et al. Cross-talk between Akkermansia muciniphila and intestinal epithelium controls diet-induced obesity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:9066–9071. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219451110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sohlenkamp C, Geiger O. Bacterial membrane lipids: diversity in structures and pathways. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016;40:133–159. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mostofian B, Zhuang T, Cheng X, Nickels JD. Branched-chain fatty acid content modulates structure, fluidity, and phase in model microbial cell membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123:5814–5821. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b04326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhang Y-M, Rock CO. Membrane lipid homeostasis in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008;6:222–233. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wallace M, et al. Enzyme promiscuity drives branched-chain fatty acid synthesis in adipose tissues. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2018;14:1021–1031. doi: 10.1038/s41589-018-0132-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Forouhi NG, Krauss RM, Taubes G, Willett W. Dietary fat and cardiometabolic health: evidence, controversies, and consensus for guidance. Brit. Med. J. 2018;361:k2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Taormina VM, Unger AL, Schiksnis MR, Torres-Gonzalez M, Kraft J. Branched-chain fatty acids—an underexplored class of dairy-derived fatty acids. Nutrients. 2020;12:2875. doi: 10.3390/nu12092875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Akira S, Takeda K. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4:499–511. doi: 10.1038/nri1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ottman N, et al. Pili-like proteins of Akkermansia muciniphila modulate host immune responses and gut barrier function. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0173004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Plovier H, et al. A purified membrane protein from Akkermansia muciniphila or the pasteurized bacterium improves metabolism in obese and diabetic mice. Nat. Med. 2017;23:107–113. doi: 10.1038/nm.4236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ouyang J, et al. The bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila: a sentinel for gut permeability and its relevance to HIV-related inflammation. Front Immunol. 2020;11:645. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Oh SF, et al. Host immunomodulatory lipids created by symbionts from dietary amino acids. Nature. 2021;600:302–307. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04083-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yao J, Rock CO. Bacterial fatty acid metabolism in modern antibiotic discovery. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 2017;1862:1300–1309. doi: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lu BL, Williams GM, Brimble MA. TLR2 agonists and their structure–activity relationships. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2020;18:5073–5094. doi: 10.1039/D0OB00942C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wijayadikusumah AR, et al. Geometry of a TLR2-agonist-based adjuvant can affect the resulting antigen-specific immune response. Mol. Pharmaceut. 2019;16:2037–2047. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jin MS, et al. Crystal structure of the TLR1-TLR2 heterodimer induced by binding of a tri-acylated lipopeptide. Cell. 2007;130:1071–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jin MS, Lee J-O. Structures of TLR–ligand complexes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2008;20:414–419. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Su L, et al. Structural basis of TLR2/TLR1 activation by the synthetic agonist diprovocim. J. Med. Chem. 2019;62:2938–2949. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang Y, et al. Adjuvant effect of the novel TLR1/TLR2 agonist diprovocim synergizes with anti–PD-L1 to eliminate melanoma in mice. Proc Nat Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:201809232. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809232115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheng K, et al. Specific activation of the TLR1-TLR2 heterodimer by small-molecule agonists. Sci. Adv. 2015;1:e1400139. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1400139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Erturk-Hasdemir D, et al. Symbionts exploit complex signaling to educate the immune system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:26157–26166. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915978116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gaffen SL, Jain R, Garg AV, Cua DJ. The IL-23–IL-17 immune axis: from mechanisms to therapeutic testing. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14:585–600. doi: 10.1038/nri3707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zähringer U, Lindner B, Inamura S, Heine H, Alexander C. TLR2 – promiscuous or specific? A critical re-evaluation of a receptor expressing apparent broad specificity. Immunobiology. 2008;213:205–224. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Belkaid Y, Harrison OJ. Homeostatic immunity and the microbiota. Immunity. 2017;46:562–576. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ansaldo E, Belkaid Y. How microbiota improve immunotherapy. Science. 2021;373:966–967. doi: 10.1126/science.abl3656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.East JE, Macdonald TL. Cost-effective and large-scale synthesis of 16:0 lysophosphatidic acid. Synthetic Commun. 2012;42:3614–3619. doi: 10.1080/00397911.2011.587080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ishihara K, Kurihara H, Yamamoto H. An extremely simple, convenient, and selective method for acetylating primary alcohols in the presence of secondary alcohols. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:3791–3793. doi: 10.1021/jo00067a005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Doussin S, Birlirakis N, Georgin D, Taran F, Berthault P. Novel zwitterionic reverse micelles for encapsulation of proteins in low‐viscosity media. Chem. Eur. J. 2006;12:4170–4175. doi: 10.1002/chem.200501422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Picelli S. Single cell methods, sequencing and proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019;1979:25–44. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9240-9_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wingett SW, Andrews S. FastQ Screen: a tool for multi-genome mapping and quality control. F1000Research. 2018;7:1338. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15931.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–140. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bray NL, Pimentel H, Melsted P, Pachter L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2016;34:525–527. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Long F, et al. AceDRG: a stereochemical description generator for ligands. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2017;73:112–122. doi: 10.1107/S2059798317000067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Goddard TD, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 2018;27:14–25. doi: 10.1002/pro.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Morin A, et al. Collaboration gets the most out of software. eLife. 2013;2:e01456. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
RNA sequencing data generated during this study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, GSE199367). NMR data generated during this study are available in Extended Data Tables 1 and 2. Complex modelling was based on the crystal structure from the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID 2z7x). The complete A. muciniphila BAA-835 genome was obtained from GenBank (CP001071.1).