Abstract
Capsaicinoids, the pungent component of chili peppers, are generally analyzed by precise analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), but these are not practical for the mass analyses of samples. To analyze mass samples rapidly, a colorimetric method was suggested. In this work, pigments and capsaicinoids were efficiently separated from chili pepper extract by sequential solid–liquid extraction and liquid–liquid extraction in test tubes followed by a colorimetric analysis on the capsaicinoids by a selective chromogenic reaction with Gibbs reagent (2,6-dichloroquinone-4-chloroimide). In the comparison of the capsaicinoid content by the colorimetric method and HPLC using acetone extracts of fresh pepper and dry red pepper as samples, R2 was 0.9973 and 0.9816, respectively, which shows a high linear correlation. In addition, a minimum of 1 μg/mL capsaicinoids can be detected and it was therefore determined that the method can efficiently analyze a great quantity of samples in a short time.
Keywords: capsaicinoids, colorimetric method, liquid/liquid extraction, solid/liquid extraction
1. Introduction
The secondary metabolites retaining the pungency of chili peppers, called capsaicinoids, are alkaloids composed of vanillylamide and an acyl chain, which are classified by the acyl chain structure into a capsaicin group, dihydrocapsaicin group, and N-vanillyl-n-acrylamide group [1]. The bio-components of capsaicinoid derivatives from chili peppers are affected by various factors such as varieties of chili pepper, cultivation conditions, level of aging, and processing methods [2–5]. Among capsaicinoid derivatives, capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide) and dihydrocapsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillylnonanamide) account for 80–90% of the capsaicinoids in chili peppers and are therefore the main determinants of pungency [6–10].
The annual global output of chili peppers was approximately 34.5 million tons in 2012 [11] and this is cultivated as a spice crop. Chili peppers are used in natural pigments and drug substances, and have a high economic value. Thus, rapid and simple quantification of the capsaicinoid content is very important for breeding a variety of chili peppers and quality control of processed products.
Various methods to measure the capsaicinoid content have been used. The pungency in chili pepper fruit or food is traditionally measured by the Scoville heat test [12], which gradually dilutes a sample to measure pungency. It quantifies the heat level and is a useful scale to indicate pungency. However, this method is dependent on human senses and requires trained personnel. It can be difficult to measure the pungency of food, such as kimchi groups, that utilizes a lot of spices. Instrumental analytical methods to quantify pungency include high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [13–16], gas chromatography [17–19], and UV spectrophotometry [20]. The aforementioned chromatographic analysis can measure the amount of capsaicinoid derivatives and total capsaicinoids. However, it requires a lot of time, money, effort, and equipment so it is inefficient to apply to the breeding of chili peppers or to the quality control of processed products where a large quantity of samples needs to be analyzed quickly. Meanwhile, the Scoville heat unit (SHU) uses a universal unit indicating pungency, and therefore the amount of capsaicinoids analyzed by instrumental analysis is sometimes converted to SHU [21].
2,6-Dichloroquinone-4-chloroimide (DCQ) forms color by reaction with phenols and can be used to detect capsaicinoids. However, pigments contained in chili pepper include capsanthin, carotenoids, chlorophyll, etc., [22,23] and pepper extracts
cannot be directly quantified by the colorimetric method. To overcome these disadvantages, colorimetry has been suggested for the evaluation of extracted capsaicinoids and pigments after separating them from a chili pepper extract by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) or paper chromatography [24,25].
Capsaicinoids share a phenolic hydroxyl group in the molecular structure. A phenolic hydroxyl group forms phenolate ions in basic conditions, and forms salt with metal ions. In this process, changes in basicity of a solution affect relative solubilities in a solvent and so capsaicinoids can be selectively transferred from an organic solvent to an aqueous solution or from an aqueous solution to an organic solvent.
Liquid–liquid extraction is used to separate compounds based on the difference in relative solubilities between two solvents, such as a water-immiscible solvent and a water-miscible solvent, which are not mixed together. In this study, pigments and capsaicinoids were selectively separated from chili pepper extract in test tubes based on the principles of solid–liquid extraction and liquid–liquid extraction. The vanillyl group of capsaicinoids was reacted with DCQ for color formation to suggest a colorimetric method able to quantitatively measure total capsaicinoid content.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Capsaicin, dihydrocapsaicin, ethanol, DCQ, HPLC-grade acetonitrile, and HPLC-grade water were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Chili peppers (Capsicum annuum) were cultivated on a farm near Chuncheon, Korea. We obtained fresh pepper from the farm and dry red pepper was purchased on sale.
2.2. Extraction of capsaicinoids
Five-gram whole fresh peppers and dry red pepper were ground with a home blender for 3 minutes and then a fivefold volume of acetone was added, respectively, to the extract at 50°C for 1 hour in triplicate. Centrifuged supernatant was taken for HPLC and colorimetric analysis.
2.3. HPLC and TLC analysis
For HPLC analysis, the acetone extract was filtered with a 0.22-μm membrane filter and then directly injected into the HPLC system (GTS 30, Young Lin, Anyang-si, Republic of Korea) using YMC hydrosphere C18 S-5 (4.6 × 150 nm) as a column. The isocratic mobile phase was acetonitrile/1% acetic acid in water (40:60, v/v) with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The absorbance was measured at 280 nm (see Supplementary Material online). For TLC, silica gel 60 F254 precoated plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used with toluene/chloroform/acetone (55/26/19, v/v/v) in the solvent system. Capsaicinoids were detected by spraying 0.1% DCQ solution and placing the plate in a chamber saturated with ammonia vapor.
2.4. Experimental design
For direct colorimetric quantification of capsaicinoids from pepper extracts, these pigments act as interfering substances so it is important to separate the pigments and capsaicinoids. When pepper extracts are developed by TLC, there are several components affecting chromogenic reactions, besides pigments. To investigate the partition efficiency of capsaicinoids from an organic solvent layer to an alkali solution, 250 μg capsaicin was dissolved in 5 mL of dichloromethane (polarity 3.1), tetrachloromethane (polarity 1.6), and n-hexane (polarity 0.0), which are hydrophobic organic solvents with different polarities. Then, 10 mL of 0.05N NaOH was added to each capsaicin solution followed by intense vortexing. Finally, capsaicin transferred into a water layer was identified by TLC.
Because of liquid–liquid extraction between an n-hexane solution and NaOH solution, capsaicin is solubilized to be an NaOH solution for complete partitioning. Therefore, the n-hexane solution obtained through solid–liquid extraction was used for liquid–liquid extraction with an NaOH solution. A 4-mL n-hexane solution containing capsaicinoids and pigments was taken and then partitioned by 0.05N NaOH solution (10 mL).
2.5. Colorimetric quantification of capsaicinoids
Chromogenic substances by origin are water-soluble components with high polarity extracted with acetone and they affect the chromogenic reactions of capsaicinoids. To remove them, extracts in the test tube were completely dried and then n-hexane was added to selectively extract capsaicinoids and pigments from the remaining solids; 1 mL acetone extract of chili pepper was transferred into a glass test tube and completely dried by nitrogen gas. Five milliliters n-hexane was added and the mixture was allowed to remain at room temperature for 10 minutes to dissolve the extract. Then, the 4-mL n-hexane layer was carefully taken to a new tube without any solid materials tagging along. To 4 mL of n-hexane solution, 10 mL of 0.05N NaOH was added and the mixture was intensely vortexed. The supernatant was removed. One milliliter from the NaOH layer left was taken and then mixed with 50 μL of 1N HCl, 50 μL of 0.1% DCQ, and 50 μL of 2.5% ammonia solution in order. The mixture was reacted at room temperature for 10 minutes and the absorbance was measured at 600 nm.
For the standard, 5 mg capsaicin was dissolved in 10 mL of methanol and 50 μL, 100 μL, 200 μL, and 400 μL of the solution were transferred into glass tubes with the methanol removed by nitrogen gas. Each standard was dissolved in 4 mL of hexane and then extracted with the NaOH solution for color development as mentioned earlier.
3. Results
3.1. Selective solubilization of capsaicinoids
In the results, the higher polarity solvent shows a lower transfer efficiency of capsaicin into a water layer. However, in case of hexane, most of the capsaicin was transferred into a water layer by a primary partition. The color formation resulting after partitioning with a 0.05N NaOH solution in capsaicin standards at each concentration dissolved in n-hexane is shown in Figure 1. R2 was 0.9996. It was confirmed that the partition was proportional to the capsaicin concentration.
Figure 1.
The calibration curve of capsaicin partitioned from n-hexane to 0.05N NaOH solution.
3.2. Chromogenic reaction of capsaicinoids from chili pepper extract
Acetone extracts of fresh pepper and dry red pepper have a unique color. Unique pigments of chili pepper are not limited to acetone extracts and those are also extracted in methanol and ethanol extracts. In Lanes 1 and 5 of Figure 2, it is indicated that there are many components in each extract of fresh pepper and dry red pepper with chromogenic reactions by DCQ in the origin [26,27]. These pigments in extracts act as interfering substances so it is important to separate the pigments and capsaicinoids. Water-soluble substances in the origin were removed by solid–liquid extraction using n-hexane because they remained solids (Figure 2, Lanes 2 and 6).
Figure 2.
Thin-layer chromatogram of pepper extracts. Lane 1, acetone extract of fresh pepper; Lane 2, n-hexane extract from dried Lane 1; Lane 3, upper layer (partitioning between Lane 2 and 0.05N NaOH); Lane 4, lower layer (partitioning between Lane 2 and 0.05N NaOH); Lane 5, acetone extract of dried red pepper; Lane 6, n-hexane extract from dried Lane 5; Lane 7, upper layer (partitioning between Lane 6 and 0.05N NaOH); Lane 8, lower layer (partitioning between Lane 6 and 0.05N NaOH). Thin-layer chromatography plate was developed with a solvent system of toluene/chloroform/acetone (55/26/19, v/v/v). Then, 0.1% 2,6-dichloroquinone-4-chloroimide solution was sprayed and color was developed in an ammonia vapor chamber.
Capsaicinoids were solubilized and completely transferred to an NaOH layer, whereas pigments were left in an n-hexane layer (Figure 2, Lanes 3 and 7). Therefore, capsaicinoids and pigments were efficiently separated by liquid–liquid extraction.
The NaOH solution partitioned in this process was used for a chromogenic reaction according to the experimental method and to measure the absorbance. After a 10-minute color development, the blue color was stabilized and maintained for more than 60 minutes. Lastly, as shown in Figure 1, samples for chromogenic reactions of capsaicinoids in Lanes 4 and 8 showed some color-forming components in the origin but the blue color formation of capsaicinoids was not affected. The capsaicinoids content in the acetone extract of chili pepper was analyzed by HPLC and the total capsaicinoid content was calculated by adding up areas of nordihy-drocapsaicin, capsaicin, and dihydrocapsaicin, which were the three main peaks. Tables 1 and 2 compared the results of the quantification of fresh pepper and dry red pepper, respectively. The regression coefficients (R2) of the total capsaicinoid content from the colorimetric and HPLC methods were 0.9973 (Figure 3A) for fresh pepper and 0.9816 (Figure 3B) for dry red pepper, which showed very high correlations.
Table 1.
Comparison of the capsaicinoids content according to quantification methods from fresh pepper.
| Sample | Capsaicinoids (μg/g) | (Colorimetric/HPLC) × 100 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| HPLC | Colorimetric | ||
| FP 1 | 144.9 | 134.7 | 93.0 |
| FP 2 | 232.7 | 221.8 | 95.3 |
| FP 3 | 235.3 | 219.7 | 93.4 |
| FP 4 | 426.1 | 419.0 | 98.4 |
| FP 5 | 557.7 | 551.2 | 98.8 |
| FP 6 | 315.8 | 284.4 | 90.1 |
| FP 7 | 278.1 | 264.6 | 95.1 |
| FP 8 | 236.5 | 228.5 | 96.6 |
| FP 9 | 392.8 | 358.6 | 91.3 |
| FP 10 | 94.3 | 90.5 | 96.0 |
| FP 11 | 22.4 | 22.1 | 98.7 |
| FP 12 | 108.1 | 106.0 | 98.0 |
| FP 13 | 145.7 | 142.5 | 97.8 |
| FP 14 | 13.4 | 12.7 | 95.0 |
| FP 15 | 104.0 | 103.8 | 99.8 |
| FP 16 | 336.1 | 323.9 | 96.4 |
| FP 17 | 218.5 | 215.2 | 98.5 |
| FP 18 | 40.6 | 39.5 | 97.3 |
| FP 19 | 266.6 | 247.8 | 92.9 |
| FP 20 | 463.1 | 432.9 | 93.5 |
| FP 21 | 288.2 | 267.2 | 92.7 |
| FP 22 | 69.6 | 67.5 | 97.0 |
| FP 23 | 462.9 | 450.2 | 97.3 |
| FP 24 | 84.0 | 80.7 | 96.1 |
| FP 25 | 183.9 | 174.5 | 94.9 |
| FP 26 | 411.1 | 382.7 | 93.1 |
| FP 27 | 113.9 | 103.8 | 91.1 |
| FP 28 | 45.3 | 44.1 | 97.4 |
| FP 29 | 105.2 | 104.5 | 99.4 |
| FP 30 | 147.4 | 139.6 | 94.7 |
| Average ± deviation | 95.8 ± 2.5 | ||
FP = fresh pepper; HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography.
Table 2.
Comparison of the capsaicinoids content according to quantification methods from dry red pepper.
| Sample | Capsaicinoids (μg/g) | (Colorimetric/HPLC) × 100 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| HPLC | Colorimetric | ||
| DP 1 | 859.0 | 901.2 | 104.9 |
| DP 2 | 855.2 | 921.1 | 107.7 |
| DP 3 | 988.4 | 988.0 | 96.9 |
| DP 4 | 622.6 | 676.8 | 108.7 |
| DP 5 | 1186.4 | 1122.0 | 94.6 |
| DP 6 | 558.8 | 580.3 | 103.8 |
| DP 7 | 645.6 | 659.8 | 102.2 |
| DP 8 | 174.0 | 164.2 | 94.3 |
| DP 9 | 889.2 | 882.7 | 99.3 |
| DP 10 | 715.2 | 749.3 | 104.8 |
| DP 11 | 798.2 | 861.4 | 107.9 |
| Average ± deviation | 102.3 ± 5.2 | ||
DP = dry red pepper; HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography.
Figure 3.
A correlation between the colorimetric method and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in quantification of capsaicinoids from (A) fresh pepper and (B) dry red pepper.
4. Discussion
Quantification of capsaicinoids retaining the pungency of chili peppers is widely conducted using instrumental analyses such as HPLC [13–16] and gas chromatography [17–19]. These methods universally separate and detect substances by chromatography, and are strong and elaborate methods indicating a high level of analysis to separate even a capsaicinoid isomer. The heat scale is expressed as the SHU [12]. In instrumental analysis, all capsaicinoids were added up to be converted to SHU [21]. When the scale of pungency needs to be large in the case of breeding chili peppers or quality control of chili pepper products, analysis of total capsaicinoids by colorimetry would be a very practical method.
Capsaicinoids have vanillylamide, a branched fatty acid, and a phenolic hydroxyl group in the molecule’s structure in common. A phenolic hydroxyl group forms color through a reaction with vanadium chloride [28], phosphotungstic–phosphomolybdic acid [29], and DCQ [30] and is therefore used for the colorimetry of total capsaicinoids. Colorimetric analysis using the aforementioned methods for determination of capsaicinoids was developed and reported [31–34]. However, these methods are an inaccurate quantification of capsaicinoids because the quantitative methods use pepper extracts without separation of the pigments as interfering substance.
Water-soluble solvents including acetone and alcohol are used as extraction solvents of chili pepper [35,36]. As shown in Figure 2, the extract contains color developing components by DCQ besides capsaicinoids and pigments, so it is necessary to efficiently separate these components, as shown in the results, and successfully remove them (Figure 2).
Upon comparing the results of the capsaicinoid content by the colorimetric method and HPLC using fresh pepper and dry red pepper as samples, the regression coefficient (R2) value was found to be 0.9973 and 0.9816 (Figures 3A and 3B), respectively. The high value indicates the accuracy and reliability of the method. In particular, a great quantity of sample, which could not be analyzed by instrumental analysis, could be analyzed simultaneously using simple equipment, such as a centrifuge and spectrophotometer, without the need for expensive equipment. Therefore, it is possible to drastically reduce overall analysis time. Usability of the method will be efficient in the breeding process of chili peppers, which need to be analyzed in a short time with hundreds of samples produced simultaneously. In addition, 1 μg/mL capsaicinoids as a minimum can be detected and it is therefore postulated that the method could easily be applied to drug manufacturing and quality control of chili pepper products, such as kimchi and chili pepper sauce.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by 2014 Research Grant from Kangwon National University (Grant No. C1010701-01-01).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.11.007.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by 2014 Research Grant from Kangwon National University (Grant No. C1010701-01-01).
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- 1. Schweiggert U, Carle R, Schieber A. Characterization of major and minor capsaicinoids and related compounds in chili pods (Capsicum frutescens L.) by high-performance liquid chromatography/atmospheric pressure chemical ionization mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;557:236–44. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Contreras-Padilla M, Yahia EM. Changes in capsaicinoids during development, maturation, and senescence of chile peppers and relation with peroxidase activity. J Agric Food Chem. 1998;46:2075–9. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kirschbaum-Titze P. Pungency in paprika (Capsicum annuum). 2. Heterogeneity of capsaicinoid content in individual fruits from one plant. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:1264–6. doi: 10.1021/jf0105283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Reilly CA, Crouch DJ, Yost GS. Quantitative analysis of capsaicinoids in fresh peppers, oleoresin capsicum and pepper spray products. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46:502–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Topuz A, Dincer C, Özdemir KS, Feng H, Kushad M. Influence of different drying methods on carotenoids and capsaicinoids of paprika (Cv., Jalapeno) Food Chem. 2011;129:860–5. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Antonious GF, Berke T, Jarret RL. Pungency in Capsicum chinense: variation among countries of origin. J Environ Sci Heal B. 2009;44:179–84. doi: 10.1080/10934520802539830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Antonious GF, Jarret RL. Screening Capsicum accessions for capsaicinoids content. J Environ Sci Heal B. 2006;41:717–29. doi: 10.1080/03601230600701908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cisneros-Pineda O, Torres-Tapia LW, Gutiérrez-Pacheco LC, Contreras-Martín F, González-Estrada T, Peraza-Sánchez SR. Capsaicinoids quantification in chili peppers cultivated in the state of Yucatan, Mexico. Food Chem. 2007;104:1755–60. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kobata K, Sugawara M, Mimura M, Yazawa S, Watanabe T. Potent production of capsaicinoids and capsinoids by Capsicum peppers. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:11127–32. doi: 10.1021/jf403553w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Poyrazoğlu ES, Yemiş O, Kadakal Ç, Artik N. Determination of capsaicinoid profile of different chilli peppers grown in Turkey. J Sci Food Agric. 2005;85:1435–8. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT database collections, agricultural data, food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. 2015. [Accessed August 29, 2015]. Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/faostat/collections?subset=agriculture.
- 12. Scoville WL. Note on capsicums. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1912;1:453–4. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Al Othman ZA, Ahmed YB, Habila MA, Ghafar AA. Determination of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in Capsicum fruit samples using high performance liquid chromatography. Molecules. 2011;16:8919–29. doi: 10.3390/molecules16108919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Barbero GF, Palma M, Barroso CG. Determination of capsaicinoids in peppers by microwave-assisted extraction–high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. Anal Chim Acta. 2006;578:227–33. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2006.06.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Garcés-Claver A, Arnedo-Andrés MS, Abadía J, Gil-Ortega R, Álvarez-Fernández A. Determination of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin in Capsicum fruits by liquid chromatography-electrospray/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:9303–11. doi: 10.1021/jf0620261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Thompson RQ, Phinney KW, Welch MJ, Edward WV. Quantitative determination of capsaicinoids by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;381:1441–51. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-3102-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Krajewska AM, Powers JJ. Gas chromatography of methyl derivatives of naturally occurring capsaicinoids. J Chromatogr A. 1987;409:223–33. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Pino J, González M, Ceballos L, Centurión-Yah AR, Trujillo-Aguirre J, Latournerie-Moreno L, Sauri-Duch E. Characterization of total capsaicinoids, colour and volatile compounds of Habanero chilli pepper (Capsicum chinense Jack.) cultivars grown in Yucatan. Food Chem. 2007;104:1682–6. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Todd PH, Bensinger MG, Biftu T. Determination of pungency due to capsicum by gas-liquid chromatography. J Food Sci. 1977;42:660–5. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Davis CB, Markey CE, Busch MA, Busch KW. Determination of capsaicinoids in habanero peppers by chemometric analysis of UV spectral data. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55:5925–33. doi: 10.1021/jf070413k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Orellana-Escobedo L, Garcia-Amezquita LE, Olivas GI, Ornelas-Paz JJ. Capsaicinoids content and proximate composition of Mexican chili peppers (Capsicum spp.) cultivated in the State of Chihuahua. CyTA-J Food. 2001;11:179–84. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Giuffrida D, Dugo P, Torre G, Bignardi C, Cavazza A, Corradini C, Dugo G. Characterization of 12 Capsicum varieties by evaluation of their carotenoid profile and pungency determination. Food Chem. 2013;140:794–802. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.09.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Topuz A, Ozdemir F. Assessment of carotenoids, capsaicinoids and ascorbic acid composition of some selected pepper cultivars (Capsicum annuum L.) grown in Turkey. J Food Compos Anal. 2007;20:596–602. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Perucka I, Oleszek W. Extraction and determination of capsaicinoids in fruit of hot pepper Capsicum annuum L. by spectrophotometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. Food Chem. 2000;71:287–91. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Trejo-González A, Tamirano CW. A new method for the determination of capsaicin in Capsicum fruits. J Food Sci. 1973;38:342–5. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mínguez Mosquera MI. Study of lability and kinetics of the main carotenoid pigments of red pepper in the de-esterification reaction. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;46:566–9. doi: 10.1021/jf970632d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Weissenberg M, Schaeffler I, Menagem E, Barzilai M, Levy A. Isocratic non-aqueous reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of capsanthin and capsorubin in red peppers (Capsicum annuum L.), paprika and oleoresin. J Chromatogr A. 1997;757:89–95. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(96)00665-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hayden A, Jordan CB. Report on the vanadium oxytrichloride colorimetric method for the determination of capsaicin in capsicum. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1941;30:107–13. [Google Scholar]
- 29. North H. Colorimetric determination of capsaicin in oleoresin of capsicum. Anal Chem. 1949;21:934–6. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gibbs HD. Phenol tests: III. The indophenol test. J Biol Chem. 1927;72:649–64. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Gibbs HAA, O’Garro LW. Capsaicin content of West Indies hot pepper cultivars using colorimetric and chromatographic techniques. HortScience. 2004;39:132–5. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Han JH, Hong SC, Lee WM, Ahn YK, Lee JD, Do JW, Park SJ, Yoon JB. Development of a rapid method for capsaicinoids detection in fresh pepper fruits by Gibb’s reagents spraying. Korean J Breed Sci. 2013;45:311–6. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Katoch R. Analytical techniques in biochemistry and molecular biology. New York: Springer; 2011. pp. 305–6. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Thompson RQ, Chu C, Gent R, Gould AP, Rios L. Visualizing capsaicinoids: colorimetric analysis of chili peppers. J Chem Educ. 2012;89:610–2. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Attuquayefio VK, Buckle KA. Rapid sample preparation method for HPLC analysis of capsaicinoids in capsicum fruits and oleoresins. J Agric Food Chem. 1987;35:777–9. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bae H, Jayaprakasha GK, Jifon J, Patil BS. Extraction efficiency and validation of an HPLC method for flavonoid analysis in peppers. Food Chem. 2012;130:751–8. [Google Scholar]




