Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 6;607(7920):741–746. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04913-9

Extended Data Fig. 10. Tuning to the ConSink is not an artefact of allocentric tuning in ConSink cells Part 3.

Extended Data Fig. 10

a, b, We repeated this analysis omitting those cells with a normalized egocentric-allocentric MRL difference of 0.05, that is, those ConSink cells most likely to be mis-identified as allocentric-tuned cells (number of cells omitted: rat 1, session 1: 6/21; session 2 goal 1: 13/47, goal 2: 8/25; rat 2, session 1: 10/27; session 2 goal 1: 3/14, goal 2: 5/21; rat 3, session 1: 10/29; session 2 goal 1: 3/23, goal 2: 1/16; rat 4, session 1: 7/30; session 2 goal 1: 1/25, goal 2: 2/19; rat 5, session 1: 16/35). Similarly, there was little change in the mean sinks or the field vectors.