Abstract
Non-proteogenic amino acids and functionalized peptides are important motifs in modern drug discovery. Here we report that AlaB can serve as universal building blocks in the synthesis of a diverse collection of modified amino acids, peptides, and proteins. First, we develop the synthesis of AlaB from redox-active esters of aspartic acid resulting in a series of β-boronoalanine derivatives. Next, we show that AlaB can be integrated into automated oligopeptide solid-phase synthesis. AlaB is compatible with common transformations used in preparative peptide chemistry such as native chemical ligation and radical desulfurization as showcased by total synthesis of AlaB-containing ubiquitin. Furthermore, AlaB reagents participate in Pd-catalyzed reactions, including C-C cross-couplings and macrocyclizations. Taken together, AlaB synthons are practical reagents to access modified peptides, proteins, and in the synthesis of cyclic/stapled peptides.
Keywords: non-proteogenic amino acids, boronoalanine, AlaB, macrocyclization, peptides
Graphical Abstract
A novel amino acid synthon in the form of boronoalanine (AlaB) suitable for umpolung peptide/protein functionalization is described. We demonstrate that AlaB can be incorporated into peptides and proteins, and remains stable under solid-phase synthesis, native chemical ligation, and radical desulfurization. Furthermore, AlaB is a competent partner in inter(intra)molecular C(sp3)-C(sp2) cross-couplings.
Peptides and proteins are important targets in modern drug discovery because of their ease of synthesis, low toxicity, and target selectivity.[1] Native peptides, however, can often show low bioavailability and short lifetimes rendering them suboptimal for clinical applications.[2] To address these challenges, non-proteogenic amino acids (NPAAs), a class of amino acids not encoded in the human genome, emerged as a valuable tool to increase structural diversity and improve pharmacokinetic properties.[3] Several strategies to access NPAAs are known including the Strecker reaction,[4] asymmetric hydrogenation,[5] conjugate addition,[6] biotransformations,[7] photoredox cross-electrophile coupling,[8] C-H activation[9], and phase-transfer alkylation.[10] Access to unnatural surrogates through any of these strategies complements studies on selective modifications of biologics that can be achieved through various handles that can enable downstream functionalizations (Scheme 1A). One promising approach that can avoid competing reactions with innate groups are transformations based on umpolung of reactivity.[11] We recently reported the synthesis and applications of AlaSn reagents in the form of carbastannatrane 1,[12] a member of a larger group of reagents where alanine’s β-carbon is substituted with a metal or metalloid (Scheme 1B). AlaM reagents represent a novel type of synthons that can be engaged in cross-coupling reactions through a reversal of polarity at the β-carbon. From a conceptual standpoint, these reagents can give rise to native as well as unnatural amino acids based on a formal alanine derivatization. Several members of this family are known including organogermanium AlaGe 2,[13] organoboron AlaB 3,[14] organosilane AlaSi 4[14l, 15] organozinc AlaZn 5,[16] organolithium,[14e, 14g] and organonickel AlaNi[17] derivatives (Scheme 1B). Unlike α-aminoboronic acids, which have an established position as protease inhibitors,[18] boronoalanine AlaB has only recently emerged as a tool to interrogate protein function[19] and as a potential Taspase1 inhibitor.[14i] Several methods are known to access AlaB either as a racemic material derived from conjugate addition to dehydroalanine (Dha)[14l, 14o, 14u, 19–20] or as an enantiomerically pure material from serine through a multistep synthesis from asymmetrically protected 2-amino-1,3-propanediol[14e] and auxiliary-directed C-H activation of alanine amides[15d] (Scheme 1C). Furthermore, despite its synthetic appeal, AlaB has not been used in cross-coupling reactions with carbon-based electrophiles. Here we show that AlaB in the form of BMIDA boronate (MIDA = N-methylimidoacetic acid) and BPai ester (Pai = 1S,2S,3R,5S-(+)-pinanediol) can be readily accessed from aspartic acid through decarboxylative borylation[21] and serve as convenient reagents in the synthesis of functionalized amino acids, cyclic peptides, and proteins through a Pd-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura C-C cross-coupling. These novel reagents are stable under strongly acidic and basic conditions, are compatible with current peptide and protein synthesis protocols and address an important synthetic gap in the preparation of functionalized amino acids and peptide-based therapeutics.
Scheme 1.
AlaM as synthetic reagents for peptide and protein modifications.
In our initial investigations into the synthesis of AlaB we diverted from 1,4-conjugate additions to Dha because the stereochemistry at the resulting α-carbon can be difficult to control[14u] and extensive optimizations may be required to achieve practical selectivities.[20, 22] Instead, we opted to develop a more direct synthesis from L-aspartic acid which presents several benefits in respect to the scalability and functional group compatibility (Scheme 2). We first converted aspartic acids 10 and 11 into redox active esters followed by light-mediated decarboxylative borylation and trans ligation with (+)-pinanediol or MIDA to give 12–15 in acceptable yields (41–70%).[23] Further investigations into the optical purity of the resultant amino acids by acylation with α-methoxy-α-trifluoro-methylphenylacetic acid[24] revealed ~3% epimerization (for details, see the SI). We hypothesized that the boronic acid intermediate activates the carboxylate ester effectively rendering the α-proton prone to soft enolization. On the basis on this proposal, we opted to avoid the boronic acid intermediate, and we investigated complementary conditions described by Aggarwal[25] and Baran.[26] Because the photoredox reaction with B2Cat2 19 produces a primary alanine radical,[21c, 27] affords a boronic ester and the catechol ligand can easily be exchanged, we opted to use these conditions in the preparation of 12. To our delight, subjecting redox-active esters to the photoredox conditions followed by pinanediol delivered AlaB (12) with no detectable epimerization (19F NMR of the Mosher amide) and in excellent yields. The optimized protocol was then applied to the synthesis of Boc and Fmoc-protected AlaB in the form on BPai and BMIDA esters. BMIDA ester 15 was also readily converted into a free acid suitable for oligopeptide/protein synthesis (vide infra).
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of AlaBPai and AlaBMIDA reagents.
[a] Refers to conditions A. [b] Refers to conditions B.
To better understand chemical behavior of AlaB reagents, we conducted in silico conformational analysis of three representative AlaB structures in the form of pinacol (Pin, entry 1–3) and Pai esters (entry 4–6, Table 1A). Two Lewis basic sites located either at the α-amine (such as amides or carbamates) or the carboxylic acid (and its derivatives) can compete for boron’s empty p orbital. Computational data indicate that both Pin and Pai esters prefer structures 21 and 22 over other conformers not stabilized by direct C=O→B interactions. Among the two boracycles 21 and 22, five-membered isomers 22 are favored for all computed structures with the carboxylate ions existing almost exclusively in the cyclic form 22.[14a] Larger pinanediol groups are more efficient in shielding the boron center, which is also reflected in lower stabilization energies among the two isomers (entries 1–3 vs. 4–6). This study also allowed us to evaluate the effects of intramolecular carbonyl activation on acidity of α-protons (Table 1B). In each case, the α protons carry increased positive charge consistent with our observations that epimerization can be observed for some AlaB amino acids. Interestingly, boron coordination has little effect on the computed atomic charges of the carbonyl group. However, intramolecular activation of the boron towards transmetalation becomes important in the subsequent studies on Pd-catalyzed C-C coupling of these C(sp3) nucleophiles (vide infra).
Table 1.
Conformational preferences of AlaB.
![]() |
A. Calculated at M06−2X/6−311+G(d,p) (SDM THF)//B3LYP-GD3(J3)/6–31(d) (SDM THF) level of theory (298 K, 1 atm). Structures 21 used as the reference (0.0 kcal·mol−1). B. Atomic NBO charges for the lowest energy conformers calculated at M06–2X/6–311+G(d,p) (SDM THF)//B3LYP-GD3(J3)/6–31(d) (SDM THF).
Several features of AlaB and its derivatives are important to highlight. AlaBMIDA and AlaBPai are convenient reagents in solution-phase and automated solid-phase synthesis of oligopeptides and proteins (Scheme 3). We first demonstrated that boron remains intact under acidic conditions required to cleave peptides from the resin (95% TFA) after solid-phase synthesis (23 and 24). Similarly, the effects of boron substitution on the efficiency of macrocylization are minimal, as demonstrated in total synthesis of boronoalanine analog of pseudostellarin G 24.[28]
Scheme 3.
Elaboration of AlaB into peptides and proteins.a
[a] LC conditions: Agilent EC-C18 Poroshell, 40 °C, 1 mL/min; 5–65% MeCN/H2O with 0.05 % TFA over 1 h. Abbreviations: DIPEA=diisopropylethylamine; Gnd=guanidine; GSH=glutathione reduced; HBTU=(2-(1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate; MPAA=mercaptophenylacetic acid; SPPS=solid-phase peptide synthesis; TCEP=(tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine; TFA=trifluoroacetic acid; TIPSH=triisopropylsilane; VA-044=2,2’-azobis[2-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)propane]dihydrochloride.
To further highlight the utility of AlaB in the synthesis of proteins, we prepared modified ubiquitin 28 with Phe4 mutated into AlaB (Scheme 3B).[29] We selected this target because it allows to test the compatibility of AlaBMIDA with denaturating as well as reducing conditions of native chemical ligation[30] (NCL; conversion of 26 into 27) and radical desulfurization (27→28).[31] In a retrosynthetic manner, modified ubiquitin 28 was dissected into two fragments Met1-Phe45 (26) and Cys46-Gly76 (29) that were joined by the NCL. AlaMIDA was incorporated into peptide 26 (assembled through Fmoc-SPPS on the methyl Dawson MeDbz linker)[32] that allowed for in situ generation of a thioester intermediate. To our delight, boronoalanine survived several high-temperature (90 °C) couplings and basic Fmoc deprotection conditions with piperidine/DBU. The union of oligopeptides 26 and 29 could be accomplished with a thioester generated from mercaptophenylacetic acid (MPAA), but this step required additional experimentation to achieve optimal yields. We observed that hydrolysis of the peptide backbones well as formation of transient structures where the MIDA group exchanged with intramolecular Lewis basic sites such as amides forming a boraheterocyle (dehydro-27) were the main issues. We hypothesized that the formation of boronic acid anhydrides and the concomitant loss of MIDA group could be controlled by pH. We found that under basic conditions (pH 7.6), substantial cleavage of 27 was observed (72%; conversion into truncated 27) and the intramolecular boronic acid anhydride constituted the remainder of the material. By adjusting pH to 6.4, we were able to improve the yield of 27 to 89% and reduce the fragmentation to ~11%, but we also observed that the MIDA group was removed during HPLC purification resulting a dehydrated boronic acid. Next, in order to complete the chemical synthesis of 28, we subjected 27 to radical desulfurization with glutathione (GSH)[33] as the H-atom donor and reduced Cys46 to Ala46 in 33% isolated yield after HPLC purification. Gratifyingly, these conditions showed no cleavage or truncation of 28. The isolated material shows the formation of dehdro-28 (MS) due to loss of water from boronic acid whereas the HPLC trace indicates a single entity. Collectively, these results demonstrate that AlaB itself can serve as a unique NPAA and is compatible with the current methods for chemical synthesis of proteins.
With several AlaB derivatives in hand, we next investigated if these primary nucleophiles could participate in Pd-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions (Table 2). Curiously, previous studies did not report if AlaB could participate in either radical or two-electron C-C bond-forming processes. The initial optimization studies identified BPai ester 30 with PdCl2 (10 mol%), K2CO3 (3 equiv.), Ag2O (2 equiv.) in 1,4-dioxane at 100 °C and a monodentate phosphine ligand as a promising catalytic system (entries 1–5). JackiePhos (entry 2) optimized to promote rapid transmetalation of AlaSn reagents furnished low yield of 32 (15%),[12] whereas SPhos (entry 3) and XPhos (entry 4) resulted in encouraging albeit suboptimal yields (47–48%). Based on these initial screening studies, we next turned to diphosphines, among which dppf was identified as the most efficient ligand (entries 6–14). We found that moderate yields were obtained for reactions with K2CO3 (entry 5) and Cs2CO3 (entry 8) but slight improvement was observed for K3PO4 and KF (entries 6 and 7). Pd(II) as the precursor for this transformation was consistently superior when compared to the efficiency of the reaction catalyzed by Pd(0) (entry 9) as well as to the conditions where excess of the electrophile 31 was used (entry 10). Because even after 24 h 4-bromobiphenyl 31 was not completely consumed, we elected to change silver additive to Ag2CO3 (entry 11), extend the reaction time to 48 h (entry 12) and increase the amount of AlaB to 2 equivalents (entry 13) which resulted in 83% yield of alanine derivative 32 (entry 14). Under the optimized conditions, we modified the solvent and used THF, which allowed us to lower the reaction temperature to 70 °C. Other solvent systems including MeCN or 2-methyltetrahydrofuran gave lower yields, but a 4:1 mixture of THF and H2O was compatible with the substrate but afforded 32 in lower yields (56%; for details, see the SI).
Table 2.
Reaction optimization for C-C cross-coupling of AlaBPai.
![]() | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Entry | Pd Catalyst | Ligand | Base | Ag Salts | Yield [%] |
1 | PdCl2 | PPh3 | K2CO3 | Ag2O | 36 |
2 | PdCl2 | JackiePhos | K2CO3 | Ag2O | 15 |
3 | PdCl2 | SPhos | K2CO3 | Ag2O | 47 |
4 | PdCl2 | XPhos | K2CO3 | Ag2O | 48 |
5 | PdCl2 | Davephos | K2CO3 | Ag2O | 28 |
6 | PdCl2dppf | K3PO4 | Ag2O | 47 | |
7 | PdCl2dppf | KF | Ag2O | 45 | |
8 | PdCl2dppf | Cs2CO3 | Ag2O | 11 | |
9 | Pd2(dba)3 | dppf | K3PO4 | Ag2O | 30 |
10 | PdCl2dppfa | K3PO4 | Ag2O | 37 | |
11 | PdCl2dppf | K3PO4 | Ag2CO3 | 63 | |
12b | PdCl2dppf | K3PO4 | Ag2CO3 | 63 | |
13d | PdCl2dppf | K3PO4 | Ag2CO3 | 73 | |
14b,d | PdCl2dppf | K3PO4 | Ag2CO3 | 83 (81)c,e |
1.0:1.5 ratio of 30 and 31.
Reaction time 48 h.
Isolated yield.
2.0:1.0 ratio of 30 and 31.
THF used instead of 1,4-dioxane. dppf = 1,1’-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene.
Scheme 4 lists the scope electrophilic coupling partners in reactions with AlaBpai-containing peptides. We found little discrimination between aryl bromides and iodides as well as the electronic nature of the aryl electrophiles (electron-rich and electron-poor) with 52–85% yields across various halides (34a-k). 2,7-Diiodonaphtalene 34f afforded doubly coupled product in acceptable yield when excess (3 equiv.) of dipeptide 33 was used. Boronoalanine coupling was also applied to late-stage diversification of small natural products and drugs (Scheme 4B). Several commercially available drugs which were pre-functionalized with aryl electrophiles such as sulfadimethoxine (34l), indomethacin (34m and 34n), steroids (34o, 34r, 34t, 34u) and esters of ibuprofen (34q) and σ-tocopherol (34u) were easily incorporated into amino acid 33 under the standardized conditions in 47–86% yield. Along similar lines, various amino acids such as tyrosine (34w), lysine (34x), and serine (34y) participated in reactions with 4-bromo-N,N-dimethylbenzamide (Scheme 4C). Finally, coupling with AlaBPai tripeptide was achieved in 56% yield when excess of 4-bromo-1,1’-biphenyl was used (34z).
Scheme 4.
Scope of Suzuki cross-coupling with AlaB.
[a] Refers to 34A series. [b] Refers to 34B series. [c] K2CO3 at 60 °C; [d] PdCl2dppf (30 mol%), 72 h.
To further demonstrate the potential of AlaB in the synthesis of functionalized peptides, we investigated reactions forming macrocyclic oligopeptides (Scheme 5). Cyclic peptides occupy a privileged role due to their propensity to inhibit protein-protein interactions[34] and their ability to permeate cell membranes while remaining resistant to degradation when compared to their acyclic congeners.[35] Direct macrolactamization is the established strategy to form cyclic/stapled peptides, but other disconnections, particularly those that introduce unnatural linkages, need to consider the inherent limitations originating from oligopeptide preorganization. The generality of the transition metal-catalyzed conditions has unlocked a new standard for late-stage, chemoselective reactions of peptides.[36] Transition metal-catalyzed reactions can take advantage of C-H activation to overcome the unfavorable cyclization but require specialized directing groups on the N-terminus to guide the sp3 activation.[36] Based on previous literature precedent[36b] we opted for short peptide sequences with 3-bromophenylalanine and AlaB occupying the terminal positions (Scheme 5). We established that during the synthesis of linear peptides 34 and 35, AlaBPai was stable to repeated LiOH saponifications to give the corresponding carboxylic acid that were subsequently elaborated into peptides 35 and 36 (for details, see the SI). These peptides were then subjected to the optimized conditions (Table 2, entry 14) and furnished 37 in 50–64% yield after HPLC purification. Macrocyclization with AlaBPai from either end of the peptide were equally successful indicating that the attempted substrates show strong conformational bias toward the formation of a macrocycle. This disconnection represents a selective and directing-group-free strategy to introduce disubstituted aryl macrocycles into peptides and further demonstrates the utility of AlaB as a universal building block.
Scheme 5.
Macrocyclization of AlaB oligopeptides.
aPdCl2dppf (10 mol%), Ag2O (2 equiv.) K2CO3 (3 equiv.) THF (50 mM). bMacrocycle derived from 35 (Boc-AlaBPai-AA2-AA3-Phe(m-Br)-OMe). cMacrocycle derived from 36 (Boc-Phe(m-Br)-AA2-AA3-AlaBPai-OMe).
In summary, we described a novel type of umpolung peptide reagents that features boronoalanine. Because BMIDA and BPai analogs are readily available in enantiomerically pure forms, incorporation of these synthons into oligopeptides and proteins that require treatments under acidic, basic, radical, and reductive conditions is now possible. Furthermore, the primary boronic esters can partake in a Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling with C(sp2) electrophiles significantly expanding the chemical space of amino acids and potentially oligopeptides and proteins. In a broader sense, AlaM reagents unlock new opportunities to functionalize peptides and proteins based on umpolung of reactivity.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01GM138682), the National Science Foundation (CHE-1753225), and the University of Colorado Boulder. Computational resources from the University of Colorado Boulder Research Computing Group were supported by the National Science Foundation (ACI-1532235 and ACI-1532236), the University of Colorado Boulder, and Colorado State University.
References
- [1].a) Fosgerau K, Hoffmann T, Drug Discov. Today 2015, 20, 122–128; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Lau JL, Dunn MK, Bioorg. Med. Chem 2018, 26, 2700–2707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Sánchez-Navarro M, Teixidó M, Giralt E, Acc. Chem. Res 2017, 50, 1847–1854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].a) Walsh CT, O’Brien RV, Khosla C, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52, 7098–7124; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Xue YP, Cao CH, Zheng YG, Chem. Soc. Rev 2018, 47, 1516–1561; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Almhjell PJ, Boville CE, Arnold FH, Chem. Soc. Rev 2018, 47, 8980–8997; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Ding Y, Ting JP, Liu J, Al-Azzam S, Pandya P, Afshar S, Amino Acids 2020, 52, 1207–1226; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Hedges JB, Ryan KS, Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 3161–3209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Wang J, Liu X, Feng X, Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 6947–6983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].a) Knowles WS, Acc. Chem. Res 1983, 16, 106–112; [Google Scholar]; b) Nájera C, Sansano JM, Chem. Rev 2007, 107, 4584–4671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Aycock RA, Vogt DB, Jui NT, Chem. Sci 2017, 8, 7998–8003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].a) Shin JS, Kim BG, Biotechnol. Lett 2009, 31, 1595–1599; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Savile CK, Janey JM, Mundorff EC, Moore JC, Tam S, Jarvis WR, Colbeck JC, Krebber A, Fleitz FJ, Brands J, Devine PN, Huisman GW, Hughes GJ, Science 2010, 329, 305–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Faraggi TM, Rouget-Virbel C, Rincón JA, Barberis M, Mateos C, García-Cerrada S, Agejas J, de Frutos O, MacMillan DWC, Org. Process Res. Dev 2021, 25, 1966–1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].He J, Li S, Deng Y, Fu H, Laforteza BN, Spangler JE, Homs A, Yu J-Q, Science 2014, 343, 1216–1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].a) Maruoka K, Ooi T, Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 3013–3028; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) O’Donnell MJ, Acc. Chem. Res 2004, 37, 506–517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].White AM, Palombi IR, Malins LR, Chem. Sci 2022, 13, 2809–2823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Zhu F, Powell WC, Jing R, Walczak MA, Chem Catal. 2021, 1, 870–884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].a) Tacke R, Merget M, Bertermann R, Bernd M, Beckers T, Reissmann T, Organometallics 2000, 19, 3486–3497; [Google Scholar]; b) Merget M, Günther K, Bernd M, Günther E, Tacke R, J. Organomet. Chem 2001, 628, 183–194; [Google Scholar]; c) Zhou Z-X, Rao W-H, Zeng M-H, Liu Y-J, Chem. Commun 2018, 54, 14136–14139; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Xu M-Y, Jiang W-T, Li Y, Xu Q-H, Zhou Q-L, Yang S, Xiao B, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 7582–7588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].a) Kinder DH, Ames MM, J. Org. Chem 1987, 52, 2452–2454; [Google Scholar]; b) Hsiao GK, Hangauer DG, Synthesis 1998, 1043–1046; [Google Scholar]; c) Collier PN, Campbell AD, Patel I, Raynham TM, Taylor RJ, J. Org. Chem 2002, 67, 1802–1815; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Belfaitah A, Isly M, Carboni B, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 1969–1972; [Google Scholar]; e) Kenworthy MN, Kilburn JP, Taylor RJ, Org. Lett 2004, 6, 19–22; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Harvey JE, Kenworthy MN, Taylor RJ, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2467–2471; [Google Scholar]; g) Barfoot CW, Harvey JE, Kenworthy MN, Kilburn JP, Ahmed M, Taylor RJK, Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 3403–3417; [Google Scholar]; h) Reddy VJ, Chandra JS, Reddy MVR, Org. Biomol. Chem 2007, 5, 889–891; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Lee JT, Chen DY, Yang Z, Ramos AD, Hsieh JJD, Bogyo M, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2009, 19, 5086–5090; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) López-Pérez A, Segler M, Adrio J, Carretero JC, J. Org. Chem 2011, 76, 1945–1948; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; k) He Z-T, Zhao Y-S, Tian P, Wang C-C, Dong H-Q, Lin G-Q, Org. Lett 2014, 16, 1426–1429; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; l) Bartoccini F, Bartolucci S, Lucarini S, Piersanti G, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2015, 2015, 3352–3360; [Google Scholar]; m) Kubota K, Hayama K, Iwamoto H, Ito H, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 8809–8813; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; n) He J, Jiang H, Takise R, Zhu R-Y, Chen G, Dai H-X, Dhar TGM, Shi J, Zhang H, Cheng PTW, Yu J-Q, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 785–789; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; o) Xie J-B, Lin S, Qiao S, Li G, Org. Lett 2016, 18, 3926–3929; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; p) Bartoccini F, Cannas DM, Fini F, Piersanti G, Org. Lett 2016, 18, 2762–2765; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; q) Hayama K, Kubota K, Iwamoto H, Ito H, Chem. Lett 2017, 46, 1800–1802; [Google Scholar]; r) Kaldas SJ, Rogova T, Nenajdenko VG, Yudin AK, J. Org. Chem 2018, 83, 7296–7302; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; s) Kim J, Shin M, Cho SH, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 8503–8508; [Google Scholar]; t) Hayama K, Kojima R, Kubota K, Ito H, Org. Lett 2020, 22, 739–744; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; u) de Vries RH, Viel JH, Kuipers OP, Roelfes G, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 3946–3950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].a) René A, Vanthuyne N, Martinez J, Cavelier F, Amino Acids 2013, 45, 301–307; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Rémond E, Martin C, Martinez J, Cavelier F, Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 11654–11684; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Pan J-L, Li Q-Z, Zhang T-Y, Hou S-H, Kang J-C, Zhang S-Y, Chem. Commun 2016, 52, 13151–13154; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Liu YJ, Liu YH, Zhang ZZ, Yan SY, Chen K, Shi BF, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 13859–13862; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Fanelli R, Floquet N, Besserer-Offroy É, Delort B, Vivancos M, Longpré J-M, Renault P, Martinez J, Sarret P, Cavelier F, J. Med. Chem 2017, 60, 3303–3313; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Wan Y, Zhu J, Yuan Q, Wang W, Zhang Y, Org. Lett 2021, 23, 1406–1410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].a) Jackson RFW, Wythes MJ, Wood A, Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5941–5944; [Google Scholar]; b) Jackson RFW, James K, Wythes MJ, Wood A, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1989, 644–645; [Google Scholar]; c) Jackson RFW, Wood A, Wythes MJ, Synlett 1990, 735–736; [Google Scholar]; d) Jackson RF, Wishart N, Wood A, James K, Wythes MJ, J. Org. Chem 1992, 57, 3397–3404; [Google Scholar]; e) Jackson RFW, Wishart N, Wythes MJ, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1992, 1587–1589; [Google Scholar]; f) Jackson RFW, Turner D, Block MH, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1995, 2207–2208; [Google Scholar]; g) Dunn MJ, Gomez S, Jackson RFW, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 1995, 1639–1640; [Google Scholar]; h) Dunn MJ, Jackson RFW, Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 13905–13914; [Google Scholar]; i) Dexter CS, Chem. Commun 1998, 75–76; [Google Scholar]; j) Jackson RFW, Moore RJ, Dexter CS, Elliott J, Mowbray CE, J. Org. Chem 1998, 63, 7875–7884; [Google Scholar]; k) Dexter CS, Jackson RF, Elliott J, J. Org. Chem 1999, 64, 7579–7585; [Google Scholar]; l) Clive DLJ, Coltart DM, Zhou Y, J. Org. Chem 1999, 64, 1447–1454; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; m) Dexter CS, Jackson RFW, Elliott J, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 4539–4540; [Google Scholar]; n) Dexter CS, Hunter C, Jackson RFW, Elliott J, J. Org. Chem 2000, 65, 7417–7421; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; o) Deboves HJC, Grabowska U, Rizzo A, Jackson RFW, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans 1 2000, 4284–4292; [Google Scholar]; p) Carrillo-Marquez T, Caggiano L, Jackson RFW, Grabowska U, Rae A, Tozer MJ, Org. Biomol. Chem 2005, 3, 4117–4123; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; q) Rilatt I, Jackson RF, J. Org. Chem 2008, 73, 8694–8704; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; r) Nolasco L, Perez Gonzalez M, Caggiano L, Jackson RFW, J. Org. Chem 2009, 74, 8280–8289; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; s) Ross AJ, Lang HL, Jackson RF, J. Org. Chem 2010, 75, 245–248; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; t) Ross AJ, Dreiocker F, Schäfer M, Oomens J, Meijer AJHM, Pickup BT, Jackson RFW, J. Org. Chem 2011, 76, 1727–1734; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; u) Reeve PAP, Grabowska U, Oden LS, Wiktelius D, Wångsell F, Jackson RFW, ACS Omega 2019, 4, 10854–10865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Castaño AM, Echavarren AM, Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 4783–4786. [Google Scholar]
- [18].a) Diaz DB, Yudin AK, Nat. Chem 2017, 9, 731–742; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) António JPM, Russo R, Carvalho CP, Cal PMSD, Gois PMP, Chem. Soc. Rev 2019, 48, 3513–3536; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Tan Y, Wu J, Song L, Zhang M, Hipolito CJ, Wu C, Wang S, Zhang Y, Yin Y, Int. J. Mol. Sci 2021, 22, 12958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Mollner TA, Isenegger PG, Josephson B, Buchanan C, Lercher L, Oehlrich D, Hansen DF, Mohammed S, Baldwin AJ, Gouverneur V, Davis BG, Nat. Chem. Biol 2021, 17, 1245–1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Hargrave JD, Bish G, Köhn GK, Frost CG, Org. Biomol. Chem 2010, 8, 5120–5125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].a) deGruyter JN, Malins LR, Baran PS, Biochemistry 2017, 56, 3863–3873; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Friese FW, Studer A, Chem. Sci 2019, 10, 8503–8518; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Tian Y-M, Guo X-N, Braunschweig H, Radius U, Marder TB, Chem. Rev 2021, 121, 3561–3597; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Aguilar Troyano FJ, Merkens K, Anwar K, Gómez-Suárez A, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 1098–1115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].a) Axon JR, Beckwith AL, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun 1995, 549–550; [Google Scholar]; b) Navarre L, Darses S, Genet JP, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2004, 43, 719–723; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Navarre L, Martinez R, Genet J-P, Darses S, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2008, 130, 6159–6169; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kieffer ME, Repka LM, Reisman SE, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 5131–5137; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Wright TH, Bower BJ, Chalker JM, Bernardes GJL, Wiewiora R, Ng W-L, Raj R, Faulkner S, Vallée MRJ, Phanumartwiwath A, Coleman OD, Thézénas M-L, Khan M, Galan SRG, Lercher L, Schombs MW, Gerstberger S, Palm-Espling ME, Baldwin AJ, Kessler BM, Claridge TDW, Mohammed S, Davis BG, Science 2016, 354, 597–602; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Yang A, Ha S, Ahn J, Kim R, Kim S, Lee Y, Kim J, Söll D, Lee H-Y, Park H-S, Science 2016, 354, 623–626; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Key HM, Miller SJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 15460–15466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Hu D, Wang L, Li P, Org. Lett 2017, 19, 2770–2773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Dale JA, Mosher HS, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1973, 95, 512–519. [Google Scholar]
- [25].Fawcett A, Pradeilles J, Wang Y, Mutsuga T, Myers EL, Aggarwal VK, Science 2017, 357, 283–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].a) Li C, Wang J, Barton LM, Yu S, Tian M, Peters DS, Kumar M, Yu AW, Johnson KA, Chatterjee AK, Yan M, Baran PS, Science 2017, 356, eaam7355; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang J, Shang M, Lundberg H, Feu KS, Hecker SJ, Qin T, Blackmond DG, Baran PS, ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 9537–9542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Crespi S, Fagnoni M, Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 9790–9833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Morita H, Kobata H, Takeya K, Itokawa H, Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 3563–3564. [Google Scholar]
- [29].El Oualid F, Merkx R, Ekkebus R, Hameed DS, Smit JJ, de Jong A, Hilkmann H, Sixma TK, Ovaa H, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2010, 49, 10149–10153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Dawson PE, Muir TW, Clark-Lewis I, Kent SBH, Science 1994, 266, 776–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Wan Q, Danishefsky SJ, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2007, 46, 9248–9252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Blanco-Canosa JB, Dawson PE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2008, 47, 6851–6855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Haase C, Rohde H, Seitz O, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2008, 47, 6807–6810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Vinogradov AA, Yin Y, Suga H, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 4167–4181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Appiah Kubi G, Dougherty PG, Pei D, Methods Mol. Biol 2019, 2001, 41–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].a) Noisier AFM, Brimble MA, Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 8775–8806; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Tang J, He Y, Chen H, Sheng W, Wang H, Chem. Sci 2017, 8, 4565–4570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.