Skip to main content
Parasite logoLink to Parasite
. 2022 Jul 28;29:39. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2022038

Infestation of chigger mites on Chinese mole shrew, Anourosorex squamipes, in Southwest China and ecological analysis

Infestation de la musaraigne Anourosorex squamipes par les acariens dans le sud-ouest de la Chine et analyse écologique

Bei Li 1, Xian-Guo Guo 1,*, Cheng-Fu Zhao 1, Zhi-Wei Zhang 1, Rong Fan 1, Pei-Ying Peng 2, Wen-Yu Song 1, Tian-Guang Ren 3, Lei Zhang 1, Ti-Jun Qian 1
PMCID: PMC9331648  PMID: 35900094

Abstract

The Chinese mole shrew, Anourosorex squamipes Milne-Edwards, 1872, is a common species of insectivorous mammal in Southwest China. Based on field investigations between 2001 and 2019, the present study reports the infestation of chiggers (larvae of chigger mites) on the shrew in Southwest China and certain ecology parameters for the first time. A total of 3169 chiggers were collected from 1694 A. squamipes and they were identified into 72 species and 10 genera in the family Trombiculidae. The overall infestation prevalence (Pm), mean abundance (MA) and mean intensity (MI) of A. squamipes with chiggers reached 11.1%, 1.87 and 16.86, respectively. The species diversity, species composition and infestation of chiggers on A. squamipes fluctuated in different environments (latitudes, altitudes, habitats and landscapes) and on different sexes and ages of the shrew hosts with high heterogeneity and low species similarity. In the established linear regression equation (M* = 0.173 + 1.054 M) for dominant mite Leptotrombidium densipunctatum, both the α and β values (α = 0.173, β = 1.054) exceeded the boundary values (F = 4.67, p < 0.05), and therefore the spatial distribution pattern of this mite was determined as an aggregated distribution among different individuals of shrew hosts. The species abundance distribution of the chigger community on A. squamipes conformed to the lognormal distribution, and its curve showed a gradually descending tendency from the rare mite species to the dominant mite species. The curve tendency of species-sample relationship implies that more species of chiggers would be found if the host samples infinitely keep increasing.

Keywords: Acari, Mite, Trombiculidae, Ectoparasite, Insectivore, Soricidae

Introduction

Chigger mites (trombiculid mites) are a large group of tiny arthropods and are distributed worldwide [34, 37, 48]. The taxonomic status of chigger mites is controversial. In some of the literature, all the chigger mites have been grouped into one family, the family Trombiculidae, in the suborder Prostigmata under the order Trombidiformes of the superorder Actinotrichida (or Acariformes) [25, 34, 50]. In other articles, however, the chigger mites have been placed in two families (Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae) or three families (Trombiculidae, Leeuwenhoekiidae and Walchiidae) under the order Trombidiformes of the superorder Acariformes [4, 37, 53, 58]. To date, more than 3000 species of chigger mites have been recorded in the world and more than 500 species documented in China [5, 37, 63, 68]. The life cycle of chigger mite is complex with seven basic stages: the egg, prelarva (deutovum), larva, protonymph (nymphochrysalis), deutonymph (nymph), tritonymph (imagochrysalis) and adult (male and female) [25, 38, 48]. The larval stage of chigger mite is often known as “chigger” and therefore it is called “chigger” in the present paper instead of “chigger mite”. The chigger is the only ectoparasitic stage (ectoparasite) on the body surface of some other animals (hosts) and the exclusive transmitting vector of scrub typhus (tsutsugamushi disease) caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi [2, 25, 48]. Besides transmitting scrub typhus, some chigger species can be potential vectors of Hemorrhagic Fever With Renal Syndrome (HFRS) caused by Hantavirus [12, 42, 67], and some chiggers may be associated with the transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi and Rickettsia connori in Europe [2, 8, 27]. As a common group of ectoparasites, chiggers usually have a wide range of hosts such as reptiles, birds and mammals, including humans. Small mammals, especially rodents and shrews, are the most common hosts of chiggers [25, 35]. Chiggers usually climb and adhere to a certain height of the vegetation surface or gather at a high degree of depression hidden on the ground, waiting for the appropriate time to attach to the host animals [35, 63].

The Chinese mole shrew, Anourosorex squamipes (Milne-Edwards, 1872), is a common species of insectivore (Eulipotyphla: Soricidae), and it is also called mole shrew or Sichuan burrowing shrew, which is widely distributed in Southwestern China, Northern Vietnam, Northern Thailand and Bhutan [57, 60]. As a species of insectivorous mammal, A. squamipes often preys on soil arthropods, worms, young rodents and aquatic animals, and it plays an important role in maintaining the ecological balance in the food chain [17, 36]. At the same time, however, A. squamipes also eats various plants and crops (including their seeds and stems) and damages them as an agricultural and forestry pest, and it has two sides of function in the agroecosystem because of its complex feeding habits [22, 36, 73]. Moreover, A. squamipes is also an important reservoir host of some zoonoses (zoonotic diseases) such as leptospirosis and hantavirus lung syndrome (HPS), and it is of medical importance [9, 11, 29]. In Southwest China, A. squamipes is a common species of small mammal with a large population and it is often an agricultural and medical pest in the region [17, 18, 22]. Although previous studies reported the mitochondrial genome determination, biological characteristics and population dynamics of A. squamipes shrew [17, 18, 22, 26, 66, 73], few articles have involved the infestation of the shrew with ectoparasites (including chigger mites) and the related ecology of the mites. Between 2001 and 2019, our research group carried out a long-term field investigation and accumulated abundant original data on chiggers in Southwest China which includes five provincial regions (covering 24.5% of China’s land area), Sichuan, Yunnan, Guizhou, Tibet (Xizang Autonomous Region) and Chongqing [71]. To fully take advantage of the investigation data, the present study comprehensively analyzed the infestation and the related ecology of chiggers on A. squamipes in Southwest China based on the basic strategy of “data mining”. The present paper is the first to study chiggers on A. squamipes shrew across the five provincial regions of Southwest China, which is an attempt to enrich the knowledge about the shrew and its ectoparasitic chiggers, and provide some scientific information for the surveillance of chiggers and other related studies.

Materials and methods

Field investigation and collection of shrews and chigger mites

The field investigation was carried out at 91 investigation sites (counties) in Southwest China (see Table 1 and Fig. 1 in “Results”). Shrews and other small mammals were captured with mousetraps (18 × 12 × 9 cm, Guixi Mousetrap Apparatus Factory, Guixi, Jiangxi, China). At the investigation sites, mousetraps with baits were randomly placed in different habitats in the evening and then checked the next morning. The habitats covered residential areas (houses, stables, barns and nearby surroundings), farmlands, bushes and woodlands. The trapped shrews and other small mammals were separately placed in a white cloth bag and then transported to the field laboratory where ectoparasitic chiggers were collected. The collected chiggers were preserved in a vial containing 70% ethanol [11, 38, 68]. After the collection of chiggers, each animal host was identified into species according to its appearance (body size, shape and hair color), body measurements (body weight, body length, tail length, ear height and hind foot length) and other morphological characteristics [56, 60, 61]. In the laboratory, the collected chiggers were mounted onto glass slides with Hoyer’s solution. After dehydration, drying and transparency, the mounted specimens of chiggers were identified into species under Leica DM 3000 LED microscopes [11, 13, 21, 25, 49]. According to the available taxonomic literature (books and papers) and taxonomic keys, the identification for each chigger specimen was done under a high power lens (10 × 40) and oil immersion lens (10 × 100) of the microscope, based on the careful observation and measurement of the related taxonomic structures of chiggers (see Table 2 and Fig. 2 in “Results”) [25, 49, 50, 53]. Following identification of animal hosts and chiggers, all Chinese mole shrews (A. squamipes), together with chiggers on the body surface of shrews, were chosen as the target of the present study. The use of animals (including animal euthanasia) for research was officially approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Dali University, under permission number DLDXLL2020-1104. Representative specimens of animal hosts (shrews) and chiggers were deposited in the specimen repository of the Institute of Pathogens and Vectors, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China.

Table 1.

A total of 91 investigation sites (counties) in Southwest China (2001–2019).

No. Codes Investigation sites
1 AY Anyue*
2 BC Binchuan
3 BY Bayi (Linzhi city)
4 CS Changshou*
5 CY Cangyuan*
6 DC Daocheng
7 DJ Dianjiang*
8 DL Dali*
9 DQ Deqin
10 DY Daying*
11 DYu Duyun*
12 FC Fucheng (Mianyang city)*
13 FG Fugong
14 FL Fuling
15 FY Fuyuan*
16 GD Guiding
17 GL Guanling
18 GM Gengma*
19 GS Gongshan*
20 GZ Ganzi
21 HK Hekou
22 HS Huishui*
23 HX Huaxi (Guiyang city)*
24 HY Hongya*
25 JC Jianchuan
26 JH Jinghong
27 JJ Jiangjin*
28 JK Jiangkou
29 JP Jinping*
30 JS Jinsha*
31 JT Jintang*
32 JY Jiangyang (Luzhou city)*
33 KR Karuo (Changdu city)
34 LC Longchuan
35 LH Lianghe*
36 LHo Luhuo
37 LL Luliang
38 LLi Longli*
39 LP Lanping*
40 LS Lushui
41 LX Luxian*
42 LZ Lezhi
43 MEK Maerkang
44 MG Maguan*
45 MH Menghai
46 MK Mangkang
47 ML Mengla
48 MLi Muli*
49 MN Mianning*
50 MY Miyi
51 MZ Mengzi
52 NE Ninger
53 PA Puan
54 PC Pingchang*
55 PS Pingshan*
56 QB Qiubei
57 QJ Qiaojia*
58 QW Qianwei*
59 RJ Rongjiang
60 RL Ruili*
61 RS Renshou*
62 SJ Suijiang*
63 SM Simao
64 SN Sinan
65 SZ Shizhu
66 SZh Shizhong (Leshan city)*
67 TN Tongnan*
68 TZ Tongzhi
69 WS Wenshan
70 WuS Wusheng*
71 WX Weixi*
72 WY Weiyuan*
73 WZ Wanzhou*
74 XC Xiangcheng
75 XGLL Xianggelila
76 XH Xuanhan*
77 XX Xixiu (Anshun city)*
78 XZ Xuzhou (Yibin city)*
79 YaJ Yajiang
80 YD Yongde*
81 YJ Yuanjiang
82 YL Yulong*
83 YoY Youyang
84 YuY Yunyang*
85 YY Yanyuan*
86 ZA Zhengan
87 ZF Zhenfeng
88 ZJ Zhijin
89 ZS Zhongshan (Liupanshui city)*
90 ZX Zhongxian*
91 ZZ Zizhong*

Note: The investigated sites (counties) marked with “*” were the capture sites for Chinese mole shrews (Anourosorex squamipes).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Investigation sites (n = 91) in Southwest China between 2001 and 2019.

Table 2.

The related taxonomic morphology of chiggers, the larvae of chigger mites (cited from Stekolnikov, 2013 [49]).

Abb. Corresponding morphology
AL Length of anterolateral scutal setae
AM Length of anteromedian scutal seta
AP Distance from AL to PL on one side
AW Distance between anterolateral scutal setae
D max Length of the longest dorsal idiosomal seta
D min Length of the shortest dorsal idiosomal seta
DS Number of dorsal idiosomal setae (including humeral)
fCx Coxal setation
fT Formula of palpotarsus
H Length of humeral setae
Ip Sum of leg lengths (pa + pm + pp)
NDV Number of idiosomal setae (DS + VS)
Oc Eyes on ocular plates
ASB Distance from the level of sensillary bases to extreme anterior margin of scutum
fsp Leg segmentation formula, the numbers of apparent segments of each pair of legs
fD Dorsal setal formula including number of humeral setae (H) and arrangement of dorsal idiosomal setae by rows
fSt Sternal setal formula, the numbers of anterior (between coxae I) and posterior (between coxae III) sternal setae
fp Palpal setation formula (N = nude, B = branched) including conditions of palpal femoral seta, palpal genual seta, and three palpal, tibial setae (dorsal, lateral, and ventral)
pa Length of leg I (including coxa)
PL Length of posterolateral scutal setae
pm Length of leg II (including coxa)
pp Length of leg III (including coxa)
PW Distance between posterolateral scutal setae
S Length of sensilla
SB Distance between sensillary bases
SD Length of scutum (ASB + PSB)
TaIIIL Length of leg tarsus III
TaIIIW Width of leg tarsus III
V max Length of the longest ventral idiosomal seta
V min Length of the shortest ventral idiosomal seta
PLs The horizontal line of the base of posterolateral scutal setae
VS Number of ventral idiosomal setae (excluding coxal and sternal)
PSB Distance from the level of sensillary bases to extreme posterior margin of scutum
SIF Synthetic identification formula which is generally accepted in the taxonomy of chigger mites
P-PL Distance from the level of posterolateral scutal setae to extreme posterior margin of scutum

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Scutum of chiggers and measurements (abbreviations and corresponding morphology are the same as in Table 2, cited from Stekolnikov, 2013 [49]).

Statistics of chigger infestation on A. squamipes

The constituent ratio (Cr), prevalence (Pm), mean abundance (MA), and mean intensity (MI) were used to calculate the infestation of A. squamipes with chiggers. Differences in infestation were compared based on different sexes and ages of hosts (A. squamipes), and on different latitudes, altitudes, habitats and geographical landscapes [13, 30, 40, 45, 51, 62, 68]. The formulae of Cr, Pm, MA and MI were as follows:

Cr=NmM×100%;
Pm=HmH×100%;
MA=NmH;
MI=NmHm.

In the above formulae, Nm = the individuals of a certain chigger species, M = the total individuals of all the chigger species, Hm = the individuals of A. squamipes shrews infested with chiggers, and H = the individuals of all the shrews examined.

Statistics of chigger community on A. squamipes

In the present study, all the chiggers on A. squamipes are defined as a chigger community. Species richness (S), Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′), Pielou evenness index (E), and Simpson dominance index (D) were used in the calculation of the community. Jaccard’s similarity index (J) was used to compare the species similarity between two different community units [14, 31, 47, 54, 62, 72].

S=Sm;
H=-m=1SNmMlnNmM;
E=HlnS;
D=m=1SNmM2;
J=c(a+b-c).

In the above formulae, Sm = species m in a certain community, a = the number of chigger species in community A, b = the number of chigger species in community B, and c = the number of common species in both community A and B. Nm and M, the same as before. The value of Jaccard’s similarity index (J) ranges from 0 to 1 (J: 0–1).

Analysis of the spatial distribution pattern of dominant chigger species

In combination with the significance test of deviation (F test), Iwao’s linear regression model (M* = α + βM) was used to analyze the spatial distribution pattern of dominant chigger species on A. squamipes shrews [10, 15, 16, 24]. In the regression equation M* = α + βM, when α = 0 and β = 1 (F < F0.05(2, N-2), p > 0.05), the spatial distribution pattern was determined to be the random distribution, and when α > 0 and β > 1 (F > F0.05(2, N-2), p < 0.05), the aggregated distribution [10, 39].

M*=α+βM(Iwao’s linear regression);
F=12Nα2+2α(β-1)i=1NMi+(β-1)2i=1NMi21N-2i=1N(Mi*-α-βMi)2;
Mi=1Nij=1NiMij;
Mi*=Mi+σi2Mi-1.

In the above formulae, M and M* represent the mean of chigger individuals and Lloyd’s mean crowding, α the intercept and β the slope in establishing Iwao’s linear regression. Mi, and Mi* stand for the mean and Lloyd’s mean crowding in sampling unit i, and N is the number of sampling units. Mij is the chigger individuals on animal host (A. squamipes) j in sampling unit i, Ni the number of animal hosts in sampling unit i, and Mi, σi2 and Mi* the mean, variance and mean crowding in sampling unit i.

Species abundance distribution of chigger community on A. squamipes

The curve tendency of the species abundance distribution of the chigger community on A. squamipes was depicted in a semi-logarithmic coordinate system. In the semi-logarithmic coordinate system, the X-axis was marked with log intervals based on log3N and it represents the chigger individuals in the community, and the Y-axis marked with arithmetic scales stands for the number of chigger species in the community [11, 44, 70].

Species-sample relationship of chigger community on A. squamipes

In the chigger community on A. squamipes shrews, all the individuals of shrews were randomly divided into several groups with 50 shrews in each group and the remaining 44 shrews in the last group, which represents the sampling units in the analysis of species-sample relationship. The curve of the species-sample relationship of the community was then depicted in a coordinate system in which the X-axis was marked with log-transformed individuals of A. squamipes shrews and the Y-axis was marked with the number of chigger species in the community [39, 70, 72].

Significance test

A Chi-square test (χ2) was used to test the significance of Pm, and a nonparametric test was used to test the significance of MA and MI. All the statistical analyses were performed with version 25.0 of SPSS software.

Results

Infestation and community structure of chiggers on A. squamipes

As shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, Chinese mole shrews were captured from 49 of 91 investigation sites (counties), with a total of 3192 chiggers collected from 1694 host shrews. Based on a series of taxonomic structures of chiggers (Table 2), 3169 of 3192 collected chiggers were identified into 72 species and 10 genera in the family Trombiculidae, with high species diversity (Table 3). The remaining 23 chiggers were unidentified because of broken body, covered dirt, unclear structure and suspected new species, and they were not included in the statistical analysis. The overall prevalence (Pm), mean abundance (MA), and mean intensity (MI) of A. squamipes with chiggers reached 11.1%, 1.87 and 16.86, respectively. Of 72 chigger species identified, Leptotrombidium densipunctatum (Yu et al., 1982) (Fig. 3) was the most dominant with the highest constituent ratio (Cr = 22.1%), and the Cr of every other chigger species was less than 10%. The infestation indices of L. densipunctatum on A. squamipes were Pm = 4.6%, MA = 0.41 and MI = 9.10. Based on the 72 identified species and 3169 chigger individuals, the community structure was calculated. The species richness (S), Shannon–Wiener diversity index (H′), Pielou evenness index (E), and Simpson dominance index (D) of the chigger community on A. squamipes were S = 72, H′ = 2.90, E = 0.68 and D = 0.09, respectively.

Table 3.

Chiggers identified from Chinese mole shrews (Anourosorex squamipes) in Southwest China (2001–2019).

Taxonomic taxa of chiggers Individuals
Family Trombiculidae Ewing, 1929
Genus Leptotrombidium Nagayo et al., 1916
L. densipunctatum Yu et al., 1982 701
L. rusticum Yu, Yang & Gong, 1986 284
L. hiemalis Yu et al., 1982 220
L. fujianense Liao & Wang, 1983 206
L. longimedium Wen & Xiang, 1984 191
L. xiaowei Wen & Xiang, 1984 167
L. sinicum Yu et al., 1981 166
L. deliense (Walch, 1922) 144
L. eothenomydis Yu & Yang, 1986 120
L. sialkotense Vercammen-Grandjean & Langston, 1976 52
L. shuqui Wen & Xiang, 1984 38
L. spicanisetum Yu et al., 1986 23
L. bambicola Wen & Xiang, 1984 25
L. scutellare (Nagayo et al., 1921) 20
L. rubellum Wang & Liao, 1984 17
L. longchuanense Yu & al., 1981 17
L. kunmingense Wen & Xiang, 1984 13
L. lianghense Yu et al., 1983 10
L. gongshanense Yu et al., 1981 8
L. yongshengense Yu & Yang, 1986 6
L. suense Wen, 1984 6
L. kitasatoi (Fukuzumi & Obata, 1956) 6
L. bishanense Yu et al., 1986 6
L. guzhangense Wang et al., 1985 6
L. imphalum Vercammen-Grandjean & Langston, 1975 4
L. xiaguanense Yu & Yang, 1981 3
L. quadrifurcatum Wen & Xiang, 1984 3
L. akamushi (Brumpt, 1910) 3
L. dognluoense Wang et al., 1981 3
L. baoshui Wen & Xiang, 1984 3
L. wangi Yu et al., 1986 2
L. sheshui Wen & Xiang, 1984 2
L. allosetum Wang et al., 1981 2
L. kawamurai (Fukuzumi & Obata, 1953) 2
L. apodevrieri Wen & Xiang, 1984 2
L. ejingshanense Yu et al., 1982 2
L. alpinum Yu & Yang, 1986 2
L. qujingense Yu et al., 1981 2
L. chuanxi Wen et al., 1984 1
L. shanghaiense Wen & Lu, 1984 1
L. taishanicum Meng et al., 1983 1
L. pavlovskyi (Schulger, 1948) 1
L. muntiaci Wen & Xiang, 1984 1
L. hanseni Traub & Lakshana,1966 1
Genus Gahrliepia Oudemans, 1912
G. eurypunctata Jeu, Yu & Wan, 1983 312
G. longipedalis Yu & Yang, 1986 77
G. tenella Traub & Morrow, 1955 57
G. latiscutata Chen & Fan, 1981 49
G. radiopunctata Hsu et al., 1965 46
G. yangchenensis Chen et Hsu, 1957 42
G. deqinensis Yu & Yang, 1982 19
G. yunnanensis Hsu et al., 1965 14
G. chekiangensis Chu, 1964 8
G. silvatica Yu & Yang, 1982 4
G. zhongwoi Wen & Xiang, 1984 3
G. agrariusia Hsu et al., 1965 2
G. lamella Chen et al., 1980 2
G. octosetosa Chen et al., 1956 2
G. xiaowoi Wen & Xiang, 1984 1
G. miyi Wen & Song, 1984 1
Genus Trombiculindus Radford, 1948
T. nujiange Wen & Xiang, 1984 1
T. cuneatus Traub & Evans, 1951 1
Genus Neotrombicula Hirst, 1925
N. longmenis Wen & Xiang, 1984 4
N. japonica (Tanaka et al., 1930) 3
Genus Ascoschoengastia Ewing, 1945
A. lorius (Gunther, 1939) 1
Genus Schoengastiella Hirst, 1915
S. ligula Radford, 1946 2
Genus Walchia Ewing, 1931
W. ewingi (Fuller, 1949) 2
W. kor (Chen & Hsu, 1957) 1
Genus Herpetacarus Vercammen-Grandjean, 1960
H. hastoclavus Yu et al., 1979 1
H. aristoclavus Yu et al., 1979 1
Genus Huabangsha Wen et al., 1980  
H. megachela Wen et al., 1980 1
Genus Intermedialia Yu et al., 1979
I. hegu (Yu, Yang & Wu, 1979) 19

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Photos of Leptotrombidium densipunctatum (10 × 40), the most dominant chigger species on Anourosorex squamipes in Southwest China (top: the whole chigger; bottom: the scutum).

Fluctuation of chigger infestation in different environments

The chigger infestation and community structure on A. squamipes fluctuated in different environments such as latitudes, altitudes, habitats, and landscapes. The species richness of chiggers at latitude 24–26° N was the highest (S = 56) with higher infestations (Pm = 60.0%, MA = 15.19 and MI = 25.31) than at other latitudes (p < 0.001) (Table 4). The species similarity of chiggers was low among different latitudes (J < 0.5).

Table 4.

Infestations of Anourosorex squamipes shrews with chiggers in different environments in Southwest China (2001–2019).

Different environments Examined shrews
Species richness and infestation of chiggers on A. squamipes
Total Infested S Number of individuals Pm (%) MA MI
Latitude (°N) < 24 27 2 2 2 7.4 0.07 1
24–26 140 84 56 2126 60.0 15.19 25.31
26–28 338 38 15 292 11.2 0.86 7.68
≥ 28 1189 64 16 749 5.4 0.63 11.7
Total 1694 188 89 3169 11.1 1.87 16.86
Altitude (m) <1000 1192 64 17 749 5.4 0.63 11.7
1000–2000 379 69 30 854 18.2 2.25 12.38
2000–3000 109 55 50 1566 50.5 14.37 28.47
≥ 3000 14 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 1694 188 97 3169 11.1 1.87 16.86
Habitats Woodlands 133 12 12 69 9.0 0.52 5.75
Farmlands 547 81 40 800 14.8 1.46 9.88
Bushes 541 83 54 2250 15.3 4.16 27.11
Residential areas 473 12 5 50 2.5 0.11 4.17
Total 1694 188 111 3169 11.1 1.87 16.86
Landscapes Flatland landscape 1127 56 13 479 5.0 0.42 8.55
Mountainous landscape 567 132 68 2690 23.3 4.74 20.38
Total 1694 188 81 3169 11.1 1.87 16.86

From low to high altitudes, the species richness of chiggers on A. squamipes showed a parabolic trend, with a peak (S = 50) at the middle altitude (2000–3000 m). The infestation indices of the chiggers were also the highest at 2000–3000 m (Pm = 50.5%, MA = 14.37 and MI = 28.47, p < 0.001). No chiggers were found on A. squamipes shrews at the high altitudes (≥3000 m) (Table 4). The species similarity of chiggers was low among different altitudes (J < 0.5).

The infestation of A. squamipes with chiggers also fluctuated in different habitats. The chiggers collected from A. squamipes shrews in the bush habitat accounted for 71.0% (2250/3169) of the total identified mites (Table 4). All the species richness and infestation indices of chiggers in the bush habitat (S = 54, Pm = 15.3%, MA = 4.16 and MI = 27.11) were higher than those in other types of habitats, and the species richness and infestation indices were the lowest in residential areas (houses, stables, barns and nearby surroundings) in comparison with the other three types of habitats (bushes, woodlands, and farmlands) (Table 4, p < 0.05). The species similarity of chiggers was low among different habitats (J < 0.5).

As shown in Table 4, the species richness and infestation indices of chiggers on A. squamipes in the mountainous landscape (S = 68, Pm = 23.3%, MA = 4.74 and MI = 20.38) were much higher than those in the flatland landscape (S = 13, Pm = 5.0%, MA = 0.42 and MI = 8.55, p < 0.001). The species similarity of chiggers was very low between two landscapes (J = 0.10).

Fluctuation of chigger infestation on different sexes and ages of hosts

The prevalence (Pm = 13.5%) and mean abundance (MA = 2.28) of chiggers on female A. squamipes shrews (hosts) were higher than those on male hosts (Pm = 8.2%, MA = 1.39) (p < 0.05). The mean intensity (MI) on male hosts was higher than that on females, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The species of chiggers on female shrews (60 species) were higher than those on male shrews (41 species) (Table 5). The chigger species on different sexes of A. squamipes showed low similarity (J = 0.38).

Table 5.

Chigger infestation on different sexes and ages of Anourosorex squamipes shrews in Southwest China (2001–2019).

Sexes and ages of shrews Examined shrews
Species richness and infestation of chiggers on A. squamipes
Total Infested S Number of individuals Pm (%) MA MI
Sexes Female 981 132 60 2232 13.5 2.28 16.91
Male 671 55 41 936 8.2 1.39 17.02
Total 1652 187 101 3168 11.3 1.92 16.94
Ages Juvenile 46 11 12 70 23.9 1.52 6.36
Adult 1620 171 69 2855 10.6 1.76 16.70
Total 1666 182 81 2925 10.9 1.76 16.07

Note: Animal hosts without records of sex and age were not included in this table.

The prevalence of chiggers on adult A. squamipes hosts (Pm = 10.6%) was lower than that on juvenile hosts (Pm = 23.9%), but the mean abundance and mean intensity on adult hosts (MA = 1.76) were higher than those on juvenile hosts (MA = 1.52) (p < 0.05). The mean intensity (MI) on adult hosts was higher than that on juvenile hosts, but the difference was of not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Adult shrews harbored more species (69 species) than juvenile shrews (12 species) (Table 5). The chigger species on different ages of A. squamipes showed very low similarity (J = 0.17).

Spatial distribution pattern of dominant chigger species on A. squamipes

Of 72 chigger species, L. densipunctatum was the most dominant (Fig. 3). In combination of the significance test of deviation (F test), Iwao’s regression analysis was used to analyze the spatial distribution pattern of L. densipunctatum on A. squamipes (Table 6). Based on the calculation of mean (Mi), variance (σ2) and Lloyd’s mean crowding (Mi*) in each sampling unit, the linear regression equation was established as M* = 0.173 + 1.054 M (r = 0.98, p < 0.001), where both α and β (α = 0.173, β = 1.054) exceeded the boundary values (0 and 1) for the determination of aggregated distribution with F > F0.05 (2, 20) and p < 0.05 (F = 4.61, F0.05 (2, 20) = 3.49) in F test.

Table 6.

The calculated mean (Mi), variance (σ2) and Lloyd’s mean crowding (Mi*) in different sampling units in Iwao’s linear regression analysis and the significance test of deviation (F test).

Sites M i σ 2 M i * M i * - α - βM i
1 5.79 7.93 6.16 −0.10
2 2.08 3.05 2.55 0.18
3 1.18 1.88 1.7 0.35
4 0 0 0 −0.17
5 0.14 0.27 1.07 0.75
6 0 0 0 −0.17
7 0 0 0 −0.17
8 4.35 5.84 4.70 −0.07
9 0 0 0 −0.17
10 0 0 0 −0.17
11 0.07 0.13 0.93 0.68
12 0 0 0 −0.17
13 0.01 0.01 0.10 0.82
14 0 0 0 −0.17
15 0 0 0 −0.17
16 0 0 0 −0.17
17 0 0 0 −0.17
18 0 0 0 −0.17
19 0 0 0 −0.17
20 0 0 0 −0.17
21 0 0 0 −0.17
22 0 0 0 −0.17

Note: Each sample unit represents the following counties: 1 = LH + RL; 2 = CY + GM + YD; 3 = DL; 4 = JP + MG; 5 = GS + LP + YL + WX; 6 = FY; 7 = QJ + SJ; 8 = HX + HS + DYu + LLi; 9 = XX + ZS; 10 = JS; 11 = MN + YY + MLi; 12 = XZ + PS; 13 = QW + SZh + HY; 14 = JY + LX; 15 = WY + ZZ + RS; 16 = JT; 17 = FC; 18 = PC + XH; 19 = DY + AY + WuS + TN; 20 = JJ; 21 = ZX + DJ + CS; 22 = YuY + WZ.

Species abundance distribution of chiggers on A. squamipes

In a semi-logarithmic coordinate system, the species abundance distribution of the chigger community on A. squamipes was depicted (Table 7). The curve of the species abundance distribution showed a gradually descending tendency from the rare chigger species (the highest point at Y-axis) to the dominant species (Fig. 4). The majority of chigger species (23 species) at the highest point of the Y-axis were rare species and a few mite species with abundant individuals (e.g., L. densipunctatum) were dominant (Table 7, Fig. 4).

Table 7.

Species abundance distribution of the chigger community on Anourosorex squamipes in Southwest China (2001–2019).

Log intervals Individual ranges in each log interval Midpoint values of each individual range Actual chigger species
0 0–1 1 15
1 2–4 3 23
2 5–13 9 9
3 14–40 27 9
4 41–121 81 7
5 122–364 243 8
6 365–1093 729 1

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The species abundance distribution of the chigger community on Anourosorex squamipes between chigger individuals and their corresponding species in Southwest China (2001–2019).

Species-sample relationship of chiggers on A. squamipes

The curve of the species-sample relationship of chiggers on A. squamipes shrews showed that the number of chigger species at the Y-axis increased with the increase of host individuals (shrews) at the X-axis. When the logarithm-transformed host individuals (host samples) were at 3.23 scale of the X-axis, which corresponds to all the hosts collected (1694 A. squamipes shrews), the number of chigger species at the Y-axis was still increasing with a continuous “going-up” tendency on the curve of species-sample relationship (Fig. 5). A positive linear correlation existed between the logarithm-transformed host individuals and the number of chigger species (r = 0.92).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The species-sample relationship of chiggers on Anourosorex squamipes shrews between the log-transformed host individuals (shrews) and the number of the chigger species in Southwest China (2001–2019).

Discussion

Species diversity and infestation of chiggers on A. squamipes

In the present study, 72 chigger species with 3169 individuals were collected from 1694 A. squamipes shrews in Southwest China. The 72 chigger species identified from such a single species of insectivore in Southwest China even exceeded the total mite species identified from various species of host animals in some provinces of China. For example, a total of 24 chigger species recorded in Shandong Province, 53 species in Fujian Province and 47 species in Hubei Province [7, 55, 64]. These findings indicate that A. squamipes has a high potential to harbor many chigger species with high species diversity. Southwest China covers five provincial regions of China and it is a very wide geographical region with different altitudes and landscapes, complex topography and different climate types [1]. Many studies have proven that the host specificity of chiggers is quite low. The same chigger species can infest different species of animal hosts and different chigger species can infest the same host species because of the low host specificity and frequent cross-infestation of chiggers [41, 68]. The species composition of chiggers on the same host species often fluctuates in different geographical regions and ecological environments because of low host specificity [5, 40]. High species diversity of chiggers on A. squamipes may be associated with the biological characteristics of A. squamipes, the low host specificity and cross-infestation of chiggers, the wide geographical region of Southwest China and its complex topography with different climate types [5, 43, 65]. In addition, the high species diversity of chiggers on A. squamipes may also be related to the large number of host samples (1694 A. squamipes shrews) collected from different areas of Southwest China, which increases the chances of collecting certain rare mite species [28, 43].

Although A. squamipes is an insectivore species, it often co-exists in the same geographic region, landscape and habitat with many rodent species such as Rattus norvegicus, R. tanezumi and Eothenomys miletus [41, 42]. A previous study showed that a total of 61 chigger species were identified from the brown rat (Norway rat, Rattus norvegicus) in Yunnan Province, Southwest China and the infestation indices of chiggers on R. norvegicus (Pm = 13.4%, MA = 1.27 and MI = 9.49) are close to those on A. squamipes (Pm = 11.1%, MA = 1.87 and MI = 16.86) in the present study [5]. In contrast, a total of 131 species of chigger mites were previously identified from the oriental house rat (Asian house rat, R. tanezumi) in Yunnan, with higher infestation indices (Pm = 20.9%, MA = 6.20 and MI = 29.80) [6], and 175 chigger species were identified from the large Chinese vole (large oriental vole or Yunnan red-backed vole, E. miletus) in Southwest China, with much higher infestation (MA = 20.24, 49850/2463) [43]. The species diversity (S = 71) and infestation of chiggers on A. squamipes are obviously lower than those on R. tanezumi and E. miletus [6, 43]. The results indicate that different species of small mammals (rodents and shrews) have different potential to harbor chiggers with different species diversity and infestation of the mites, which is associated with the different biological characteristics of different host species [5, 6, 40].

Infestation of A. squamipes with chiggers in different environments

The results of the present study showed that the infestation of A. squamipes with chiggers fluctuated in different environments (latitudes, altitudes, habitats, and landscapes). The species richness of chiggers was the highest at latitude 24–26° N with higher infestation than at other latitudes. The mite species richness showed a parabolic trend with the highest species richness and infestation at the middle altitude. In comparison with other three types of habitats (bushes, woodlands, and farmlands), the species richness and infestation indices of chiggers on A. squamipes were the lowest in residential areas (houses, stables, barns, and nearby surroundings) (Table 4). The species richness and infestation indices in the mountainous landscape were higher than those in the flatland landscape. The species similarities of chigger were low in different latitudes, altitudes, habitats, and landscapes (J < 0.5). The results indicate that the infestation of chiggers on the same host species (A. squamipes) was not stable and fluctuates in different environments, which may be related to the environmental heterogeneity and the low host specificity of chiggers [6, 40, 69]. Different chigger species usually have different adaptability to different environmental conditions [30, 35, 68]. There are usually different biodiversity, vegetation, and climate factors (temperature, humidity and sunshine, etc.) in different latitudes, altitudes, habitats, and landscapes, and this may be suitable to the growth, development, and reproduction of different chigger species [63, 65]. For example, there are usually far more species of plants and animals with much higher biodiversity and vegetation in outdoor habitats such as bushes, woodlands, and farmlands than in indoor and residential habitats such as houses, stables, barns, and nearby surroundings [6, 40, 62], and this may explain why the species richness and infestation indices of chiggers on A. squamipes in the habitats of bushes, woodlands and farmlands are higher than those in the residential areas (Table 4). The infestation fluctuation of chiggers in different environments also reflects the influence of environmental factors on chiggers [30, 35, 63]. Besides the influence of environmental heterogeneity, the low host specificity of chiggers may also contribute to the fluctuation of chigger infestation in different environments. As a group of ectoparasites, chiggers usually have a wide range of hosts with low host specificity. Most chigger species have not established stable and fixed parasitism with their hosts, and therefore mite infestations on the same host species would greatly fluctuate in different environments with very low species similarities [5, 42, 48]. A certain chigger species can parasitize different hosts and a certain host species can harbor different chigger species as well. Therefore, the same host species (e.g., A. squamipes) may harbor different chigger species with different mite burdens under different environmental conditions [6, 30, 42].

Chigger infestation on different sexes and ages of hosts

The results of the present study showed that the prevalence and mean abundance of chiggers on female A. squamipes shrews (hosts) were higher than those on male hosts. The number of chigger species on female shrews was also higher than those on male shrews (Table 5). The chigger prevalence on adult shrews was lower than that on juvenile shrews, but the mean abundance and mean intensity on adult shrews were higher than those on juvenile shrews. Adult shrews harbored more species than juvenile shrews (Table 5). The species similarities of chiggers were low on different sexes and ages of hosts with J = 0.38 and J = 0.17 which are much lower than 0.5, the half value of species similarity. The results indicate that chigger infestation is quite different on different sexes and ages of hosts, and this reflects the sex-bias and age-bias of the shrews when infested with chiggers. Previously there have been some reports on the sex-bias and age-bias of rodents and some other small mammals when infested with ectoparasites (including chigger mites), but their results were inconsistent. Studies have shown that male and adult hosts are more susceptible to ectoparasites with more parasite species and heavier infestation, but other reports found the opposite result [6, 28, 62]. Despite this, sex-bias and age-bias do exist in some small mammals when infested with ectoparasites. The different biological characteristics of different sexes and ages of animal hosts are often considered to be the main reasons underlying sex-bias and age-bias [20, 23].

Dominant chigger species and their spatial distribution pattern

Spatial distribution patterns are important in the study of animal and plant ecology, and usually include three pattern types: uniform, random and aggregated distributions [43, 52]. There are a series of methods to determine the spatial distribution pattern of a certain population, and Iwao’s regression method in combination with the significance test of deviation (F test) is one of them [10, 39]. The present study used Iwao’s regression with the significance test of deviation to analyze the spatial distribution pattern of L. densipunctatum which is the most dominant chigger species on A. squamipes. The result showed that both α and β values (α = 0.173, β = 1.054) exceeded the boundary values (F > F0.05 (2, 20), p < 0.05) in F test, and therefore the spatial distribution of L. densipunctatum is considered the aggregated distribution among different individuals of its hosts, A. squamipes shrews. The aggregated pattern is common in parasites and the findings in our study are highly consistent with various previous reports [3, 13, 59]. The aggregated pattern suggests that chigger distribution among different individuals of the shrew hosts is quite uneven. Some shrews harbor many individuals on their body surface forming clumps of mites, and other shrews have few or no mites. Aggregated distribution is beneficial to survival, mating, and reproduction of parasites [13, 21, 46].

Species abundance distribution of chiggers on A. squamipes

Species abundance distribution is an important notion in community ecology as it illustrates the relationship between the number of species and individuals in a community [11, 33, 72]. Our results showed that the species abundance distribution of chiggers on A. squamipes conformed to lognormal distribution, indicating that most chigger species are rare mite species, and few chigger species are the dominant mite species with abundant individuals. This result is highly consistent with findings reported in previous studies [6, 39].

Species-sample relationship of chiggers on A. squamipes

The species-sample relationship is used to illustrate the relationship between the sample and number of species in a certain community [70, 72]. In the present study, the X-axis was marked with the log-transformed individuals of A. squamipes shrews (host samples) and the Y-axis with the number of chigger species. Theoretically the number of species at the Y-axis would quickly increase with the increase of host samples at the beginning. When the increase of host samples goes on, the increase of species would gradually slow down, and ultimately get close to stopping and form a stable “platform” stage when the host samples become big enough [32, 43, 72]. In the present study, however, the number of chigger species at the Y-axis still kept increasing without the appearance of a stable “platform” stage when the host samples became quite big, 1694 A. squamipes shrews (Fig. 5). The continuous increasing tendency of the species-sample curve implies that 1,694 A. squamipes shrews (host samples) in the present study are still unable to reflect the complete species composition of chiggers on A. squamipes in the whole of Southwest China. If host samples infinitely keep increasing, more and more chigger species would be found. As mentioned above, the species composition and infestation of A. squamipes with chiggers vary in different environments with obvious heterogeneity. To reflect the complete species composition of chiggers in a very large geographical region like Southwest China, a large host sample is recommended [19, 28].

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere thanks to the following people who contributed to the field investigations and laboratory work: Yun-Ji Zou, Zong-Yang Luo, Qiao-Hua Wang, Yong Zhang, Cong-Hua Gao, Nan Zhao, Jian-Chang He, Guo-Li Li, Yan-Liu Li, Xue-Song He, De-Cai Ouyang, Shuang-Lin Wang, Jun Zhao, Ji-Wei Guo, Chang-Ji Pu, Xing-Shun Zhu, A-Si Di, Cheng-Wei He, He Sha, and Long Zhou, as well as other colleagues and college students. The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82160400) and Major Science and Technique Programs in Yunnan Province (No. 202102AA310055) to Xian-Guo Guo.

Cite this article as: Li B, Guo X-G, Zhao C-F, Zhang Z-W, Fan R, Peng P-Y, Song W-Y, Ren T-G, Zhang L & Qian T-J. 2022. Infestation of chigger mites on Chinese mole shrew, Anourosorex squamipes, in Southwest China and ecological analysis. Parasite 29, 39.

Footnotes

Edited by: Jean-Lou Justine

References

  • 1.Cao WC, Tao HP, Kong B, Liu BT, Sun YL. 2011. Automatic recognition of landforms in Southwest China based on DEM data segmentation. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 3, 38–41. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chaisiri K, Gill AC, Stekolnikov AA, Hinjoy S, McGarry JW, Darby AC, Morand S, Makepeace BL. 2019. Ecological and microbiological diversity of chigger mites, including vectors of scrub typhus, on small mammals across stratified habitats in Thailand. Animal Microbiome, 1(1), 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Costa MG, Barbosa JC, Yamamoto PT, Leal RM. 2010. Spatial distribution of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in citrus orchards. Scientia Agricola, 67(5), 546–554. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Castro Jacinavicius F, Bassini-Silva R, Mendoza-Roldan JA, Pepato AR, Ochoa R, Welbourn C, Barros-Battesti DM. 2018. A checklist of chiggers from Brazil, including new records (Acari: Trombidiformes: Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae). ZooKeys, 743, 1–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ding F, Guo XG, Song WY, Fan R, Zhao CF, Mao KY, Zhang ZW, Peng PY, Lin H, Dong WG, Qian TJ, Yang ZH, Zou YJ. 2021. Infestation and distribution of chigger mites on Brown rat (Rattus norvegicus) in Yunnan Province. Southwest China. Tropical Biomedicine, 38(1), 111–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ding F, Jiang WL, Guo XG, Fan R, Zhao CF, Zhang ZW, Mao KY, Xiang R. 2021. Infestation and related ecology of chigger mites on the Asian House Rat (Rattus tanezumi) in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Korean Journal of Parasitology, 59(4), 377–392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Duan HS, Yang ZQ, Xu GQ, Zhou SL, Wen XM, Pan XX, Liu YR. 2009. Trombiculid mite distribution in Hubei Province and Zoogeographical Demarcation of the Province. Journal of Pathogen Biology, 4(9), 687–688. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fernández-Soto P, Pérez-Sánchez R, Encinas-Grandes A. 2001. Molecular detection of Ehrlichia phagocytophila genogroup organisms in larvae of Neotrombicula autumnalis (Acari: Trombiculidae) captured in Spain. Journal of Parasitology, 87(6), 1482–1483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Guo T, Zhang HL, Zhang YZ. 2016. Research progress of hantaviruses associated with insectivorous animals. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 27(3), 305–307. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Guo X. 1997. Spatial pattern analysis of Laelaps echidninus and Laelaps nuttalli using Iwao’s method and a significance test of random deviation (Acari: Laelapidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology, 2(1), 89–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guo XG, Speakman JR, Dong WG, Men XY, Qian TJ, Wu D, Qin F, Song WY. 2013. Ectoparasitic insects and mites on Yunnan red-backed voles (Eothenomys miletus) from a localized area in southwest China. Parasitology Research, 112(10), 3543–3549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Houck MA, Qin H, Roberts HR. 2001. Hantavirus transmission: potential role of ectoparasites. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 1(1), 75–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huang LQ, Guo XG, Speakman JR, Dong WG. 2013. Analysis of gamasid mites (Acari: Mesostigmata) associated with the Asian house rat, Rattus tanezumi (Rodentia: Muridae) in Yunnan Province, southwest China. Parasitology Research, 112(5), 1967–1972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hunter PR, Gaston MA. 1988. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 26(11), 2465–2466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Iwao S. 1968. A new regression method for analyzing the aggregation pattern of animal populations. Population Ecology, 10(1), 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Iwao S. 1972. Application of the m*-m method to the analysis of spatial patterns by changing the quadratic size. Statistical Ecology, 14(1), 461–513. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Jiang F, Xu X, Luo LM, Yin Y, Luo HH, Xiao XB, Yuan CH, Wang JQ, Zhao LL. 1999. Study on the biological characteristics of Anourosorex Squamipes Miline-Edwards. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 5, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jiang GZ, Ni JY, Tan XH. 1990. Study on population dynamics of Anourosorex squamipes. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 4, 294–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kallimanis AS, Mazaris AD, Tzanopoulos J, Halley JM, Pantis JD, Sgardelis SP. 2008. How does habitat diversity affect the species – area relationship? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 17(4), 532–538. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kataranovski M, Mirkov I, Belij S, Popov A, Petrović Z, Gačić Z, Kataranovski D. 2011. Intestinal helminths infection of rats (Ratus norvegicus) in the Belgrade area (Serbia): the effect of sex, age and habitat. Parasite, 18(2), 189–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kennedy CR. 1976. Reproduction and dispersal ecological aspects of parasitology. North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Keyi T, Fei X, Hongyi L, Yingting P, Dan C, Boxin Q, Changkun F, Qiong W, Shunde C, Keji G. 2020. DNA metabarcoding provides insights into seasonal diet variations in Chinese mole shrew (Anourosorex squamipes) with potential implications for evaluating crop impacts. Ecology and Evolution, 11(1), 376–389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Krasnov BR, Matthee S. 2010. Spatial variation in gender-biased parasitism: host-related, parasite-related and environment-related effects. Parasitology, 137(10), 1527–1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kuno E. 1991. Sampling and analysis of insect populations. Annual Review of Entomology, 36(1), 285–304. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li JC, Wang DQ, Chen XB. 1997. Trombiculidmites of China. Guangdong Science and Technology Press: Guangzhou. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Li Q, Wang Q, Chen G, Fu C, Chen S. 2016. The complete mitogenome of Chinese Mole Shrew, Anourosorex squamipes (Soricidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A: DNA Mapping, Sequencing, and Analysis, 27(1), 553–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Literak I, Stekolnikov AA, Sychra O, Dubska L, Taragelova V. 2008. Larvae of chigger mites Neotrombicula spp. (Acari: Trombiculidae) exhibited Borrelia but no Anaplasma infections: a field study including birds from the Czech Carpathians as hosts of chiggers. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 44(4), 307–314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu Z, Guo XG, Fan R, Zhao CF, Mao KY, Zhang ZW, Zhao Y. 2019. Ecological analysis of gamasid mites on the body surface of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Yunnan Province, Southwest China. Biologia, 75(9), 1325–1336. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Long J, Jia QL, Li Q, Wang XL, Wu GH, Mao DQ, Han LS, Ji HQ. 2005. Epidemic factors monitoring of leoptopirosis in Chongqing. Chongqing Medicine, 34(12), 1803–1806. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lv Y, Guo XG, Jin DC, Song WY, Fan R, Zhao CF, Zhang ZW, Mao KY, Peng PY, Lin H, Zhao Y, Qian TJ, Dong WG. 2019. Host selection and seasonal fluctuation of Leptotrombidium deliense (Walch, 1922) (Trombidiformes: Trombiculidae) at a localized area of southern Yunnan. China. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 24(11), 2253–2271. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Magurran AE. 1998. Measuring richness and evenness. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 13(4), 165–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.May RM, Stumpf MPH. 2000. Species-Area relations in tropical forests. Science, 290(5499), 2084–2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, Dornelas M, Enquist BJ, Green JL, He F, Hurlbert AH, Magurran AE, Marquet PA, Maurer BA, Ostling A, Soykan CU, Ugland KI, White EP. 2007. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecology Letters, 10(10), 995–1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moniuszko H, Makol J. 2014. Chigger mites (Actinotrichida: Parasitengona, Trombiculidae) of Poland. An updated distribution and hosts. Annals of. Parasitology, 60(2), 103–117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nadchatram M. 1970. Correlation of habitat, environment and color of chiggers, and their potential significance in the epidemiology of scrub typhus in Malaya (Prostigmata: Trombiculidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 7(2), 131–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nie YG, Hu JC, Chen FH. 2006. Study on the food analysis and control about Anourosorex squamipes. Journal of West Anhui University, 22(2), 73–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nielsen DH, Robbins RG, Rueda LM. 2021. Annotated world checklist of the Trombiculidae and Leeuwenhoekiidae (17582021) (Acari: Trombiculoidea), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy, and distribution. Zootaxa, 4967(1), 1243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Peng PY, Guo XG, Jin DC, Dong WG, Qian TJ, Qin F, Yang ZH. 2017. Species abundance distribution and ecological niches of chigger mites on small mammals in Yunnan province, southwest China. Biologia, 72(9), 1031–1040. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Peng PY, Guo XG, Song WY, Hou P, Zou YJ, Fan R, He XS. 2015. Communities of gamasid mites on Eothenomys miletus in southwest China. Biologia, 70(5), 674–682. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Peng PY, Guo XG, Jin DC, Dong WG, Qian TJ, Qin F, Yang ZH, Fan R. 2018. Landscapes with different biodiversity influence distribution of small mammals and their ectoparasitic chigger mites: A comparative study from southwest China. PLoS One, 13(1), e0189987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Peng PY, Guo XG, Ren TG, Dong WG, Song WY. 2016. An updated distribution and hosts: trombiculid mites (Acari: Trombidiformes) associated with small mammals in Yunnan Province, southwest China. Parasitology Research, 115(5), 1923–1938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Peng PY, Guo XG, Ren TG, Song WY. 2015. Faunal analysis of chigger mites (Acari: Prostigmata) on small mammals in Yunnan province, southwest China. Parasitology Research, 114(8), 2815–2833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Peng PY, Guo XG, Song WY, Hou P, Zou YJ, Fan R. 2016. Ectoparasitic chigger mites on large oriental vole (Eothenomys miletus) across southwest, China. Parasitology Research, 115(2), 623–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Preston FW. 1948. The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology, 29(63), 254–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ritzi CM, Whitaker JO. 2003. Ectoparasites of small mammals from the Newport Chemical Depot, Vermillion County, Indiana. Northeastern Naturalist, 10(2), 149–158. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Rohde K. 1993. Ecology of marine parasites (2nd). Commonwealth Bureaux of Agriculture: Wallingford. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shannon CE, Weaner W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press: Urbana. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Shatrov AB, Kudryashova NI. 2006. Taxonomy, life cycles and the origin of parasitism in trombiculid mites, Micromammals and macroparasites. Springer. p. 119–140. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Stekolnikov AA. 2013. Leptotrombidium (Acari: Trombiculidae) of the World. Zootaxa, 3728, 1–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Stekolnikov AA. 2021. A checklist of chigger mites (Acariformes: Trombiculidae) of Southeast Asia. Zootaxa, 4913(1), 1–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Storm JJ, Ritzi CM. 2008. Ectoparasites of small mammals in Western Iowa. Northeastern Naturalist, 15(2), 283–292. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Touati L, Figuerola J, Alfarhan AH, Samraoui B. 2015. Distribution patterns of ectoparasites of Glossy Ibis (Plegadis falcinellus) chicks. Zoology and Ecology, 25(1), 46–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vercammen-Grandjean PH, Langston RL. 1976. The Chigger Mites of the World: (Acarina): Trombiculidae & Leeuwenhoekiidae, vol 3, George Williams Hooper Foundation, University of California. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Verma SK, Murmu TD. 2015. Impact of environmental and disturbance variables on avian community structure along a gradient of urbanization in Jamshedpur, India. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang DQ, Liao HR. 1981. List of chigger mites in Fujian Province. Wuyi Science Journal, 1(S1), 104–110. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang YX. 2003. A complete checklist of mammal species and subspecies in China. China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wei FW, Yang QS, Wu Y, Jiang XL, Liu SY, Li BG, Yang G, Li M, Zhou J, Li S, Hu YB, Ge DY, Li S, Yu WH, Chen BY, Zhang ZJ, Zhou CQ, Wu SB, Zhang L, Chen ZZ, Chen XD, Deng HQ, Jiang YL, Zhang LB, Shi HY, Lu XL, Li Q, Liu Z, Cui YQ, Li YC. 2021. Catalogue of mammals in China (2021). Acta Theriologica Sinica, 41(05), 487–501. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Wen TH. 1999. New taxa and tentative rearrangement of Walchiidae stat. n. with remarks on Trombiculoidea nec Welbourn, 1991 (Acari: Acariformes) 1. Systematic and Applied Acarology, 4(1), 165–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.White GC, Bennetts RE. 1996. Analysis of frequency count data using the negative binomial distribution. Ecology, 77(8), 2549–2557. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA. 2018. Handbook of the mammals of the world, vol 8: Insectivores, Sloths and Colugos. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wilson DE, Reeder DM. 2005. Mammal species of the World: A taxonomic and geographic reference, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xiang R, Guo XG, Zhao CF, Fan R, Mao KY, Zhang ZW, Huang XB. 2021. Infestation and distribution of gamasid mites on Himalayan field rat (Rattus nitidus) in Yunnan Province of Southwest China. Biologia, 1763–1773. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Xiang R, Guo XG. 2021. Research advances of Leptotrombidium scutellare in China. The Korean Journal of Parasitology, 59(1), 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Xue J, Zhou GZ, Liu YX. 2004. The faunal study of chigger mites in Shandong Province. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 15(6), 452–454. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yin PW, Guo XG, Jin DC, Fan R, Zhao CF, Zhang ZW, Huang XB, Mao KY. 2021. Distribution and host selection of tropical rat mite, Ornithonyssus bacoti, in Yunnan Province of Southwest China. Animals (Basel), 11(1), 110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yin WS. 2018. Preliminary study on the population characteristics of Anourosorex squamipes in Xifeng County, Guizhou Province. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 37(4), 85–88. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yu XJ, Tesh RB. 2014. The role of mites in the transmission and maintenance of Hantaan virus (Hantavirus: Bunyaviridae). The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 210(11), 1693–1699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Zhan YZ, Guo XG, Speakman JR, Zuo XH, Wu D, Wang QH, Yang ZH. 2013. Abundances and host relationships of chigger mites in Yunnan Province, China. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 27(2), 194–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Zhang L, Meng L, Guo C, Gao M, Liu D, Zhang X. 2015. Spatial heterogeneity of soil mite community and its spatial relationship with environmental factors in Maoer Mountains. International Journal of Smart Home, 9(12), 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Zhang SY, Wu D, Guo XG, Men XY. 2007. Community of fleas on Eothenomys miletus in Yunnan province. Chinese Journal of Vector Biology and Control, 6, 440–442. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang YD, Zhang XH, Liu SY. 2011. Correlation analysis on Normalized Diference Vegetation Index (NDVI) of different vegetations and climatic factors in Southwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 22(2), 323–330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhao ZM, Guo YQ. 1990. Principle and methods of community ecology. Publishing House of Scientific and Technical Documentation (Chongqing Branch): Chongqing. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zong H, Feng DS. 1998. The research on behavioural ecology of Anourosorex squamipes. Journal of Sichuan Normal University (Natural Science), 21(4), 449–452. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Parasite are provided here courtesy of EDP Sciences

RESOURCES