Skip to main content
Communications Biology logoLink to Communications Biology
. 2022 Jul 28;5:751. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03717-x

The lupus susceptibility allele DRB1*03:01 encodes a disease-driving epitope

Bruna Miglioranza Scavuzzi 1,#, Vincent van Drongelen 1,#, Bhavneet Kaur 1, Jennifer Callahan Fox 1, Jianhua Liu 1, Raquel A Mesquita-Ferrari 1, J Michelle Kahlenberg 1, Evan A Farkash 2, Fernando Benavides 3, Frederick W Miller 4, Amr H Sawalha 1,5, Joseph Holoshitz 1,
PMCID: PMC9334592  PMID: 35902632

Abstract

The HLA-DRB1*03:01 allele is a major genetic risk factor in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the mechanistic basis of the association is unclear. Here we show that in the presence of interferon gamma (IFN-γ), a short DRB1*03:01-encoded allelic epitope activates a characteristic lupus transcriptome in mouse and human macrophages. It also triggers a cascade of SLE-associated cellular aberrations, including endoplasmic reticulum stress, unfolded protein response, mitochondrial dysfunction, necroptotic cell death, and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Parenteral administration of IFN-γ to naïve DRB1*03:01 transgenic mice causes increased serum levels of anti-double stranded DNA antibodies, glomerular immune complex deposition and histopathological renal changes that resemble human lupus nephritis. This study provides evidence for a noncanonical, antigen presentation-independent mechanism of HLA-disease association in SLE and could lay new foundations for our understanding of key molecular mechanisms that trigger and propagate this devastating autoimmune disease.

Subject terms: Autoimmunity, Immunological disorders


In the presence of IFN-γ, a short DRB1*03:01-encoded allelic epitope is found to activate a characteristic lupus transcriptome in macrophages and trigger a cascade of systemic lupus erythematosus-associated cellular aberrations.

Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that afflicts millions of individuals worldwide1. The main impediment to finding a cure for SLE is incomplete understanding of its genetic and molecular mechanisms. Salient cellular aberrations observed in SLE include enhanced endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, an activated unfolded protein response (UPR), mitochondrial dysfunction and aberrant cell death, associated with a pro-inflammatory state and generation of autoantibodies against nuclear antigens, which are implicated in target tissue damage, such as lupus nephritis (LN)14. The molecular mechanism that triggers this cascade of events is largely unknown.

The contributions of genetic factors to SLE risk or disease severity are, likewise, incompletely understood. Susceptibility to the disease has been associated with more than 100 loci5,6, with a particularly strong involvement of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes7,8. Meta-analysis of genomic studies has identified DRB1*03:01 as the single most significant SLE-associated HLA allele in Europeans9. The underlying mechanism, however, is unknown. The prevailing hypotheses concerning HLA-disease association postulate presentation of self or foreign antigens by HLA molecules4,8; however, the antigen presentation hypotheses have not yet been empirically validated in SLE.

Seeking better understanding of the functional role of HLA molecules in SLE, we examined an antigen presentation-independent mechanism, modeled after the ‘MHC Cusp’ theory10,11, which postulates that in addition to presenting antigenic peptides to T cells, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules express signal transducing ligands that, upon binding to non-MHC receptors trigger allele-specific cell activation events. Under certain environmental circumstances and permissive background genes, this activation can provoke aberrant cellular events that facilitate autoimmune diseases. At the focus of the MHC Cusp theory is an α-helical cusp-like conformational motif that is shared by all products of the MHC gene family, irrespective of their primary sequences, and independent of antigen presentation. In HLA-DR molecules, the cusp involves the third allelic hypervariable region (TAHR; residues 65-79) of the DRβ chain. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) the cusp region that is coded by disease-associated HLA-DRB1 alleles encompasses a ‘shared epitope’ (SE), which has been shown to act as a ligand that activates in vitro and in vivo pro-arthritogenic events in mice1217.

Here, we examined whether the TAHR of the DRβ chain coded by the SLE-susceptibility allele DRB1*03:01 may be directly contributing to SLE pathogenesis. Our findings reveal that reminiscent of SE-coding DRB1 alleles in RA, the SLE-risk allele DRB1*03:01 encodes what we designated here as a ‘lupus epitope’ (LE) in the TAHR of the DRβ chain that, in the presence of interferon gamma (IFN-γ), activates signature lupus transcriptomes in mouse and human macrophages, and triggers SLE-characteristic cellular aberrations, including ER stress, UPR, mitochondrial dysfunction, necroptosis and production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. In the presence of IFN-γ, primary mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from non-immunized transgenic mice that carry the LE-coding DRB1*03:01 allele exhibit similar cellular aberrations ex vivo, and in vivo administration of IFN-γ to those transgenic mice produces an SLE-like disease, including formation of antidouble-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies and renal immuno-histopathology changes akin to LN.

Results

TAHR epitopes activate allele-specific transcriptomic signatures

Macrophages play a central role in autoimmune diseases, including SLE1214, and IFN-γ, known for its macrophage activation effects, is a significant factor in human SLE and experimental models of the disease15,16. Accordingly, to explore the transcriptional effects of various allelic epitopes in the HLA-DR cusp region (Supplementary Fig. 1a), we studied mouse (RAW 264.7) and human (THP-1) macrophages in the presence or absence of IFN-γ. Cells were incubated with or without one of the following linear synthetic 15mer TAHR peptides (Supplementary Fig. 1b): 65-79*LE, a TAHR (residues 65-79 of the DRβ chain) encoded by the SLE-risk allele DRB1*03:01; 65-79*SE, a TAHR encoded by a RA-risk allele DRB1*04:01; or 65-79*PE, a TAHR epitope containing a 70-DERAA-74 motif which is shared by alleles (e.g. DRB1*04:02, DRB1*13:01 & DRB1*13:02), known to associate with autoimmune disease protection1719. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed at 72 h, as previously described20.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed no significant effect on epitope-activated gene expression in the absence of IFN-γ. In its presence, however, substantial increased expression was found for representative macrophage activation gene markers (Supplementary Fig. 1c). To characterize TAHR epitopes-driven transcriptional landscapes, and to differentiate between the respective contributions of the different epitopes versus IFN-γ, RNA-seq analyses were performed using two models: 1. Transcriptional modulation by allelic epitopes in the presence of IFN-γ, versus IFN-γ alone (Model A), or 2. Transcriptional modulation by allelic epitopes in the presence of IFN-γ, versus epitope alone (Model B).

Using Model A analysis, unsupervised clustering of upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) showed distinct patterns for 65-79*LE, versus 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE (Fig. 1a). As shown in Venn diagrams (Fig. 1b) there were 683 unique DEGs upon exposure of RAW 264.7 macrophages to 65-79*LE (433 overexpressed and 250 underexpressed), and 349 unique DEGs upon exposure to 65-79*SE (173 overexpressed and 176 underexpressed genes). This model identified only 11 unique DEGs that were differentially regulated in cells exposed to 65-79*PE (Fig. 1b). Notable among the most significant group of 65-79*LE-upregulated DEGs were multiple SLE-associated genes, including Irf4, Ccl5, Cxcl10, Pim1, Traf1 amongst others (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1). By contrast, 65-79*SE-upregulated DEGs included many RA-relevant genes, including Tnfrsf9, Relb, Tnaifp3 (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1). Complete lists of all 65-79*LE- and 65-79*SE-modulated DEGs are shown in Supplementary Data File 1.

Fig. 1. Transcriptional modulation by the LE (Model A: epitope + IFN-γ, versus IFN-γ alone).

Fig. 1

a Heatmaps showing unsupervised clustering of upregulated (left, yellow) and downregulated (right, purple) DEGs for 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE and 65-79*PE. DEGs were selected based on a > 3-fold change for 65-79*LE. All depicted DEGs had a Padj < 0.05. b Venn diagrams showing comparison of DEGs for 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE and 65-79*PE. c Volcano plots comparing transcriptional modulation by 65-79*LE and 65-79*SE. Green dots denote SLE-relevant genes modulated by 65-79*LE; red dots denote RA-relevant genes modulated by 65-79*SE. d Venn diagram comparing GO-BP terms enrichment among upregulated DEGs for 65-79*LE versus 65-79*SE. e Pie charts showing differential thematic clustering of unique GO-BP term enrichment among 65-79*LE- (left) versus 65-79*SE- (right) upregulated DEGs. f Heatmap of top-ranked SLE- or ubiquitination-associated URs that are predicted to be involved in 65-79*LE transcriptional modulation, as compared to their predicted involvement in 65-79*SE transcriptional modulation. g Notable KEGG pathway enrichment among 65-79*LE-upregulated DEGs, versus 65-79*SE. Data in (bg) are based on DEGs with a fold change >1.5 and Padj < 0.05. All data are based on 6 biological replicates in 2 independent experiments. See also Supplementary Tables 1 and 4.

The respective patterns of differential gene expression by 65-79*LE versus 65-79*SE followed distinct, SLE- or RA-relevant functional categories, as determined by Gene Ontology (GO) biological processes (BP) analysis (Fig. 1d, e). Additionally, upstream regulator (UR) analysis by iPathwayGuide (iPG) showed distinct patterns between transcriptomes of 65-79*LE- and 65-79*SE-stimulated cells. There were 118 unique URs predicted in RAW 264.7 cells stimulated by 65-79*LE and 6 URs that were uniquely involved in 65-79*SE-stimulated cells. Many of the most significant URs predicted in 65-79*LE-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells are known to play pathogenic roles in SLE or ubiquitination (Fig. 1f, Supplementary Table 4).

Intriguingly, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis (Fig. 1g) identified “systemic lupus erythematosus” as the most significant pathway for upregulated DEGs by 65-79*LE (Padj = 1.79 × 10−14), while “rheumatoid arthritis” (Padj = 3.27 × 10−04) was identified as one of the most significant predicted pathways among DEGs upregulated by 65-79*SE. These data are consistent with the known associations between the LE-coding allele DRB1*03:01 and SLE9, and between the SE-coding DRB1*04:01 allele and RA21. Thus, disease-associated allele-specific TAHR epitopes that are antigen presentation-incompetent activate distinct, disease-relevant transcriptomic landscapes.

Whereas Model A analyses (epitope + IFN-γ versus IFN-γ) identified meaningful disease-relevant DEGs only in 65-79*LE- and 65-79*SE-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages, Model B analysis (epitope + IFN-γ versus epitope) revealed large numbers of DEGs in cells stimulated by each of the 3 epitopes (Fig. 2a, b). In RAW 264.7 cells, there were 764 unique DEGs in 65-79*LE-treated cells (413 overexpressed and 351 underexpressed), 270 unique DEGs in 65-79*SE-treated cells (156 overexpressed and 114 underexpressed genes), and 449 unique DEGs (244 overexpressed and 205 underexpressed) in 65-79*PE-treated cells (Fig. 2b). Substantial allelic epitope-specificity in gene expression was also found in human THP-1 macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2. Transcriptional modulation by the LE (Model B: epitope + IFN-γ, versus epitope alone).

Fig. 2

a Heatmaps showing unsupervised clustering of upregulated (left, yellow) and downregulated (right, purple) DEGs for 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE and 65-79*PE. DEGs were selected based on a >3-fold change for 65-79*LE. All depicted DEGs had a Padj < 0.05. b Venn diagram comparing DEGs for 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE and 65-79*PE. c Volcano plots comparing the differential transcriptional modulation by 65-79*LE and 65-79*PE. Green dots denote SLE-relevant genes modulated by 65-79*LE; blue dots denote RA-relevant genes modulated by 65-79*PE. d Venn diagrams illustrating the overlap between 65-79*LE-modulated gene expression in RAW 264.7 and THP-1 macrophages. e Representative SLE-relevant genes modulated by 65-79*LE in RAW 264.7 and THP-1 macrophages. f Notable KEGG disease pathway enrichment among 65-79*LE-upregulated DEGs in RAW 264.7 and THP-1 macrophages. g Heatmap of top-ranked URs that are predicted to be activated in 65-79*LE- versus 65-79*SE- and 65-79*PE-modulated transcriptomes in THP-1 macrophages. h Regulatory networks showing the interactions, mechanisms, and regulator modes for IRF9 in THP-1 macrophages. i, IFN-I-related GO-BP terms in 65-79*LE-, versus 65-79*SE- or 65-79*PE-activated transcriptomes in THP-1 macrophages. j Comparative hub gene networks for the GO-BP term “type I interferon signaling pathway” in 65-79*LE-, versus 65-79*SE- or 65-79*PE-activated transcriptomes in THP-1 macrophages. Data are based on DEGs with fold change >1.5 and Padj < 0.05. All RAW 264.7 macrophage data are based on 6 biological replicates in 2 independent experiments. THP-1 macrophage data are based on 4 biological replicates. See also Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Tables 24.

In contrast to the upregulation of many SLE-relevant genes by 65-79*LE in RAW 264.7 macrophages, 65-79*PE downregulated many pro-inflammatory and pro-SLE genes. Representative genes illustrating the dichotomous modulation of SLE pathogenesis-related gene expression by 65-79*LE versus 65-79*PE are shown in Fig. 2c and Supplementary Table 2. In this context, it is notable that DRB1 alleles that encode a PE motif (70-DERAA-74) have been previously found to significantly reduce the risk of various autoimmune diseases, including SLE1719.

Epitope-activated transcriptional modulation was also performed in human macrophages derived from the THP-1 cell line, using Model B, which revealed substantial parallels with the 65-79*LE-activated transcriptomes in mouse RAW 264.7 (Fig. 2d). Among the 79 upregulated DEGs that were shared between the mouse and human macrophage lines, 36 (45.5%) are known to either play roles in SLE pathogenesis, or associate with disease risk (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Table 3). All 65-79*LE-modulated DEGs in mouse RAW 264.7 and human THP-1 macrophages are listed in Supplementary Data Files 2 and 3. Additionally, GO-BP analysis identified SLE-relevant terms that were shared between 65-79*LE-treated human and mouse macrophages, including terms pertaining to inflammatory response, response to IFN-γ and type I IFN (IFN-I) signaling pathway (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c).

Importantly, KEGG pathway analysis in 65-79*LE-stimulated THP-1 cells (Fig. 2f) ranked several autoimmune diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (Padj = 1.60 × 10−8), SLE (Padj = 1.83 × 10−7), type I diabetes (Padj = 1.54 × 10−7) and autoimmune thyroiditis (Padj = 7.41 × 10−7) highly. It is noteworthy that allele DRB1*03:01 has been implicated as a genetic risk factor in all these autoimmune conditions9,2224.

UR analysis of THP-1 macrophage transcriptomes by iPG (Fig. 2g, h) predicted differential involvement of several regulators by the three allelic epitopes. The top predicted URs in 65-79*LE-activated transcriptome included several IFN-I regulators, such as interferon regulating factor 9 (IRF9), as well as two of its interacting proteins, signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 2 and STAT1, previously implicated in SLE pathogenesis2527. Although STAT1 was predicated to play a regulatory role in both 65-79*LE- and 65-79*SE-activated transcriptomes (Fig. 2g), the two allelic epitopes activated distinct interactions, mechanisms, and regulators (Supplementary Figs. 2d and 2e).

Consistent with the above findings, 65-79*LE-activated THP-1 macrophages showed transcriptional enrichment of multiple IFN-I-associated GO-BP terms (Fig. 2i), and the GO-BP term “Type I interferon signaling pathway” demonstrated an extensive intricate hub gene network in THP-1 macrophages activated by 65-79*LE- compared to 65-79*SE- or 65-79*PE-activated transcriptomes (Fig. 2j).

To identify transcriptional patterns that are shared between Model A and Model B, we performed bioinformatic metanalyses encompassing compiled data sets of RAW 264.7 cells in the two models (Supplementary Fig. 3). A substantial overlap was found between Model A and Model B, with 773 upregulated and 378 downregulated DEGs that were common between the two models in 65-79*LE-stimulated macrophages, and 573 common upregulated and 286 downregulated in 65-79*SE-stimulated macrophages (Supplementary Fig. 3a and 3b). 65-79*PE upregulated only 16 and downregulated no DEGs that were shared by the two models.

GO-BP analysis of upregulated DEGs in 65-79*LE- and 65-79*SE-stimulated cultures when Model A and Model B were meta-analyzed revealed distinct enrichment patterns between the two epitopes. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 3c, d, consistent with the disease relevance of their respective DRB1- coding alleles, epitopes 65-79*LE-activated transcriptomes were enriched in terms involving cell division, DNA damage and repair, and nuclear reorganization, whereas transcriptomes in cultures activated by 65-79*SE showed preponderance of GO terms related to proinflammatory and innate immune system signaling, as well as cellular stress response. Additionally, KEGG analysis revealed higher significance among pathways involving cell cycle and SLE in 65-79*LE-stimulated cells, while the higher statistically significant KEGG pathways terms in 65-79*SE-stimulated cells included TNF signaling pathways and several TNF-dependent disease processes, including RA (Supplementary Fig. 3e), consistent with the established disease associations of the two respective coding DRB1 alleles.

Thus, taken together, RNA-seq analyses identified allele-specific, functionally distinct, and clinically relevant activation of transcriptional landscapes. 65-79*LE activated an SLE-relevant transcriptome, 65-79*SE activated a pro-RA transcriptome, and 65-79*PE activated an autoimmune-protective transcriptome, consistent with the respective disease associations that the three coding DRB1 alleles demonstrate in humans.

The LE activates a cascade of lupus-associated cellular aberrations

To determine the functional impact of the three TAHR epitopes we studied their effects in IFN-γ-stimulated mouse RAW 264.7 and human THP-1 macrophages. ER stress and UPR aberrations have been long implicated in SLE pathogenesis3,28,29. As shown in Fig. 3a, RNA-seq analyses identified many ER stress and proteasome degradation genes that were differentially regulated by 65-79*LE. We therefore determined the functional impact of 65-79*LE on these cellular processes. In the presence of IFN-γ, THP-1 cells activated by 65-79*LE, but not by 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE, showed increased expression of the ER stress marker phosphorylated inositol-requiring enzyme 1 α (pIRE1α), C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) (Fig. 3b), as well as the proteasomal degradation marker p62 and overabundant poly-ubiquitinated proteins (Fig. 3c–e). Evidence of allele-specific 65-79*LE-triggered ER stress and UPR was found in RAW 264.7 macrophages as well (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Fig. 3. Activation of ER stress, UPR and mitochondrial dysfunction by the LE in human and mouse macrophages.

Fig. 3

a Heatmap of endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation pathway-related genes (Model B) modulated by 65-79*LE, versus 65-79*SE and 65-79*PE in IFN-γ-treated THP-1 macrophages. bd Representative immunoblots of ER stress markers (pIRE1-α, GRP78, CHOP) b, proteasomal degradation marker (p62) c, and poly-ubiquitinated proteins d in THP-1 macrophages in the presence of 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE, or 65-79*PE. e Representative immunocytochemistry images of poly-ubiquitinated protein accumulation (red). Scale bar = 2 μm. f Intracellular ATP levels reduction in allelic epitope-treated human THP-1 (left) and mouse RAW 264.7 (right) macrophages (n = 3). g Mitochondrial membrane potential in allelic epitope-treated THP-1 (left) and RAW 264.7 (right) macrophages, as determined by tetramethylrhodamine ethyl ester (TMRE), red (n = 4). h Baricitinib (10 μg/mL) shows allele-nonspecific inhibitory effect on LE-activated reduction of intracellular ATP in RAW 264.7 macrophages, (n = 3). i Neutralization of human IFN-alpha receptor with IFNAR2 Monoclonal Antibody (10 μg/mL) shows a trend for recovery of LE-activated intracellular ATP levels, in THP-1-derived macrophages, (n = 3). In h, i solid-color and dotted-color bars represent, respectively, absence or presence of inhibitors. Uncropped immunoblots are shown in Supplementary Fig. S9. Data represent mean ± SEM; One-way (f, g), or two-way (h, i) ANOVA.*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. See also Supplementary Fig. 4.

The ER and mitochondria are functionally entangled30,31. We therefore sought to characterize indicators of mitochondrial function, including ATP levels, mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm) and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. In the presence of IFN-γ, macrophages stimulated with 65-79*LE, but not with 65-79*SE, 65-79*PE, or with 2 other 15mer peptides corresponding to the TAHR coded by other control alleles, DRB1*04:03 and DRB1*15:01, demonstrated significantly, and dose-dependently, decreased cellular ATP levels (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Fig. 1). Corroborating evidence for 65-79*LE-activated mitochondrial dysfunction was the finding of an allele-specific effect of this epitope on mitochondrial membrane potential. In the presence of IFN-γ, 65-79*LE, but not 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE, significantly suppressed mitochondrial membrane potential and increased mitochondrial ROS both in human THP-1 and mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages (Fig. 3f, g and Supplementary Fig. 4). Reduction of intracellular ATP levels by 65-79*LE could be completely prevented in THP-1 macrophages by Baricitinib (Fig. 3h), a Janus Kinase inhibitor known to block IFN-I-activated pathways32. Additionally, a clear trend toward ATP normalization was found in cultures treated with a monoclonal antibody against IFN-I receptor, IFNAR2, as well (Fig. 3i). Thus, IFN-I appears to play a role in 65-79*LE-activated cell aberrations, consistent with the IFN-I-associated GO-BP terms enrichment effects by this epitope (Fig. 2i, j), and the known role of IFN-I in SLE.

Since mitochondrial dysfunction is a key factor involved in cell death aberrations33,34, which have long been implicated in SLE pathogenesis2,35, we next sought to determine if 65-79*LE-activated mitochondrial dysfunction leads to cell death. In the presence of IFN-γ, 65-79*LE-treated human THP-1 macrophages, but not macrophages treated with 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE, showed accelerated cell death (Fig. 4a), and reduced metabolic activity (Fig. 4b). Increased ROS levels could be seen in THP-1 macrophages stimulated with either 65-79*LE or 65-79*SE, but not with 65-79*PE (Fig. 4c). Consistent with an RNA-seq-based DNA damage gene expression heatmap (Fig. 4d), in the presence of IFN-γ, 65-79*LE facilitated DNA damage in THP-1 macrophages in an allele-specific fashion (Fig. 4e).

Fig. 4. Allele-specific activation of cell death, pro-inflammatory cytokine production and DNA damage by the LE.

Fig. 4

ac Cell death a, viability b, and ROS levels c, in THP-1 cells exposed to different allelic epitopes (n = 3). d Heatmap of DNA damage-related genes (Model B) in THP-1 cells exposed to different allelic epitopes (n = 4). e DNA damage, quantified by the comet assay, in THP-1 cells exposed to different allelic epitopes (n = 3). f–h Supernatant levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α f, IL-6 g, and IL-1β h, in THP-1 macrophages exposed to different allelic epitopes (n = 3). Data represent mean ± SEM. One-way (b, c, e, h), or two-way (a, f, g) ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. See also Supplementary Fig. 5.

Importantly, 65-79*LE-facilitated cell death was associated with a robust release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Fig. 4f–h). Similar 65-79*LE-activated release of proinflammatory mediators was observed in mouse RAW 264.7 macrophages, as well as primary, bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) isolated from 3 genetically distinct wild-type (WT) mouse strains (Supplementary Fig. 5). Cell death induced by 65-79*LE did not indicate involvement of caspase 3 activation and was resistant to inhibition by a pan-caspase inhibitor, ZVAD-FMK (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 6). Additionally, there was no significant evidence for autophagy, and rapamycin, an autophagy inducer had no effect on 65-79*LE-activated cell death in THP-1 cells, or allele-nonspecific effects in RAW 264.7 (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 6).

Fig. 5. The LE triggers necroptotic cell death in an allele-specific fashion.

Fig. 5

a Caspase-3 activity in THP-1 macrophages (n = 3). b Cell death in THP-1 macrophages in the absence (solid bars) or presence (dotted bars) of pan-caspase inhibitor ZVAD-FMK (10 µM) (n = 3). c Cell death in THP-1 macrophages in the absence (solid bars) or presence (dotted bars) of rapamycin (50 nM) (n = 3). d Immunoblot of LC3 in RAW 264.7 macrophages. e Immunoblot of Receptor-Interacting Protein 1 (RIP) in RAW 264.7 macrophages. f Immunoblot of RIP in THP-1 macrophages. g Immunoblot of pMLKL in RAW 264.7 macrophages. h Immunoblot of pMLKL in THP-1 macrophages. i Cell death of RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of the RIP1 inhibitor Necrostatin-1 (50 μM) (n = 3). j Cell death of THP-1 macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of the RIP1 inhibitor Necrostatin-1 (50 μM) (n = 3). k Cell death of RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of the MLKL inhibitor Necrosulfonamide (10 μM) (n = 3). l Cell death of THP-1 macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of the MLKL Inhibitor Necrosulfonamide (10 μM) (n = 3). Blots (dh) are representative of 3 independent experiments each. Uncropped immunoblots are shown in Supplementary Fig. S9. Data represent mean ± SEM; One-way a, or two-way (b, c, i–l) ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. See also Supplementary Fig. 6.

We proceeded to determine whether 65-79*LE-activated cell death involves necroptosis, an inflammatory, caspase-independent cell death36,37, which has been shown to feature in SLE38. Indeed, 65-79*LE-treated macrophages showed increased expression of the necroptosis markers receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein 1 (RIP1) and phosphorylated mixed lineage kinase domain-like pseudo kinase (pMLKL) (Fig. 5e–h). Moreover, the RIP1 inhibitor necrostatin1 (Nec-1) and the MLKL inhibitor necrosulfonamide (NSA) blocked potently and allele-specifically 65-79*LE-activated cell death (Fig. 5i–l).

Crosstalk between mitochondria and ER has been previously documented, with ample evidence indicating that mitochondrial dysfunction is often secondary to ER stress3941. To determine whether the mitochondrial dysfunction observed in 65-79*LE-treated macrophages is secondary to ER stress, we used sodium 4-phenylbutyrate (4-PBA), a chemical chaperone that inhibits protein misfolding, thereby inhibiting ER stress42. Relevant to the present study, 4-PBA has been shown to prevent SLE manifestations in experimental lupus models43,44. As expected, 4-PBA inhibited 65-79*LE-activated ER stress and proteasomal degradation (Fig. 6a). Further, prevented the reduction of intracellular ATP levels (Fig. 6b), reversed mitochondrial membrane potential loss (Fig. 6c), and normalized mitochondrial ROS levels (Fig. 6d), in an allele-specific fashion. Moreover, 4-PBA inhibited 65-79*LE-activated necroptosis signaling as evidenced by decreased expression of the necroptotic protein markers RIP1 and pMLKL, as well as cell death in mouse and human macrophages (Fig. 6e–g).

Fig. 6. LE-activated mitochondrial dysfunction is ER stress-dependent.

Fig. 6

a Immunoblots of CHOP and p62 in allelic epitope-treated RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of the ER stress inhibitory chemical 4-PBA (5 mM). b,d Intracellular ATP levels b, mitochondrial membrane potential c, and mitochondrial ROS levels d, in RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of 4-PBA (n = 3). e Immunoblots of RIP1 and pMLKL in allelic epitope-treated RAW 264.7 macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of 4-PBA. f, g Cell death in allelic epitope-treated RAW 264.7 f, and THP-1 g, macrophages in the presence (dotted bars) or absence (solid bars) of 4-PBA (n = 3). Blots (a, e) are each a representative of 3 independent experiments. Uncropped immunoblots are shown in Supplementary Fig. S9. Data represent mean ± SEM. Two-way ANOVA, **p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001. See also Supplementary Fig. 6.

To better map the specific pathway involved, we tested three selective inhibitors that target the transcription factor 6α (ATF6α)-, protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK)- or inositol-requiring enzyme-1 (IRE1)-mediated pathways (Supplementary Fig. 6h). The findings suggest that inhibition of the ATF6α-, but not PERK- or IRE1-mediated pathways significantly increased cellular ATP levels, suggesting that LE-activated UPR pathway is mediated by ATF6α (Supplementary Fig. 6i-6k).

Disease-promoting effects of physiologically folded LE-expressing HLA-DR molecules in transgenic mice

To determine the functional effects of the LE in its physiologically folded conformation, we performed ex vivo and in vivo experiments in transgenic mice that express on their cell surfaces heterodimeric HLA-DR molecules consisting of a monomorphic DRα chain and a polymorphic DRβ chains coded by one of the three alleles DRB1*03:01 (LE); DRB1*04:01 (SE), or DRB1*04:02 (PE). These transgenic mouse lines are referred to as LE-Tg, SE-Tg and PE-Tg, respectively. Their cell surface-expressed HLA-DR molecules differ from each other by a few amino acid residues in the 65-79 region of the DRβ chain (Supplementary Fig. 1b).

Genomic DNA analyses of the three Tg mouse lines using the MiniMUGA SNP array showed that the three Tg mouse lines include identical background strain compositions, with minor difference in the calculated percentage of genomic contribution by C57BL/6J (B6J), C57BL/10J (B10J) and SWR mouse strains (detailed in the Methods section). We therefore used these 3 WT mouse strains as genetic background controls in key experiments.

Consistent with the findings in mouse and human macrophage cell lines discussed above, when exposed to IFN-γ, primary bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) from LE-Tg showed evidence of ER stress and UPR activation (Fig. 7a, b), and reduction of intracellular ATP levels (Fig. 7c). Such effects could not be seen in LE-Tg BMDM in the absence of IFN-γ, nor could they be seen in the presence or absence of IFN-γ, in the control, SE-Tg or PE-Tg BMDMs, or in the 3 genetic background control WT mouse strains, B6J, B10J and SWR (Supplementary Fig. 7). Like the effect of 65-79*LE on the mouse and human macrophage cell lines (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5), in the presence of IFN-γ, BMDMs from LE-Tg showed increased proinflammatory milieu, as evidenced by increased production of TNF-α and nitrite (Fig. 7d, e). Such proinflammatory effects could not be seen in LE-Tg BMDM in the absence of IFN-γ.

Fig. 7. Ex vivo and in vivo effects of physiologically folded LE-expressing HLA-DR molecules.

Fig. 7

a, b Immunoblots of ER stress (pIRE1-α, CHOP, GRP78) and proteasomal degradation (p62) markers a, and poly-ubiquitinated proteins b, in BMDMs derived from transgenic mice expressing physiologically folded HLA-DRβ molecules coded by DRB1*03:01 (LE-Tg), DRB1*04:01 (SE-Tg), or DRB1*04:02 (PE-Tg) and cultured ex vivo in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (5 ng/mL). ce Intracellular ATP c, TNF-α d, and nitrite e, supernatant levels in BMDMs cultured as in (a,b). fl Groups of LE-Tg and SE-Tg were administered 10 μg recombinant mouse IFN-γ or PBS, twice weekly intraperitoneally over a 24-week period. f Serum anti-dsDNA IgG levels measured at week 24 in LE-Tg (treated with PBS, n = 9, or IFN-γ, n = 13), and SE-Tg (treated with PBS, n = 5, or IFN-γ, n = 5) mice. g Time-course levels of serum anti-dsDNA IgG levels in IFN-γ-treated LE-Tg (n = 9–13) and SE-Tg (n = 5–6). h, Comparison of anti-dsDNA IgG levels in male (n = 6) and female (n = 9) LE-Tg mice treated for 16 weeks with IFN-γ. i, Albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) in LE-Tg (PBS, n = 6, IFN-γ, n = 17) and SE-Tg (PBS, n = 4, IFN-γ, n = 12) mice. j, Percent of renal glomeruli showing microscopic evidence of glomerulitis (left) or overall glomerular pathology (right) in LE-Tg (PBS, n = 9, IFN-γ, n = 15) and SE-Tg (PBS, n = 5, IFN-γ, n = 6) mice. k Representative images of PAS-stained kidney tissues from PBS- or IFN-γ-treated LE-Tg and SE-Tg mice. Arrows point at illustrative examples of endocapillary hypercellularity (lower left), fibrous crescent (lower middle) and immune deposits (lower right). Asterisks identify interstitial inflammation areas. Scale bar = 20 µm. l Representative images of glomerular C3 deposition patterns in PBS- or IFN-γ- treated LE-Tg and SE-Tg mice. Scale bar = 50 µm. m, C3 immunofluorescence scoring. n A proposed model of the LE-activated pathogenetic cascade. In the presence of IFN-γ [i], the LE – possibly through interaction with a yet unknown cell surface receptor - triggers ER stress [ii], which leads to mitochondrial dysfunction [iii], DNA damage [iv], and necroptosis [v]. Concomitantly released pro-inflammatory cytokines enhance the immunogenicity of nuclear antigens [vi], such as dsDNA, with resultant increased levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies [vii] and formation of immune complexes [viii], which are deposited in the kidneys [ix]. Immunoblots (a and b) are representatives of 3 independent experiments each. Uncropped immunoblots are shown in Supplementary Fig. S9. Data represent mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA (ce, h, m), Two-way ANOVA (g), or Wilcoxon sign rank test (f, i, j). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

To ascertain that BMDMs from the three genetic background control strains are capable of responding to an exogenously added LE epitope, we measured their proinflammatory response to the allelic peptides in the presence or absence of IFN-γ. Interestingly, like mouse RAW 264.7 and human THP1 macrophage cell lines, in the presence of IFN-γ, BMDM of all the three control mouse strains (B6J, B10J and SWR) showed increased TNF-α and nitrite production in response to exogenously-added LE peptide 65-79*LE, but not to 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE (Supplementary Fig. 5f, g). These findings demonstrate that LE-triggered proinflammatory effects are strain- and species-independent.

Given our findings of an LE-activated IFN-I transcriptome (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2), and the known pathogenic role of IFN-I in both human SLE and mouse models of the disease26, we quantified by qPCR the expression levels of salient IFN-I genes in HLA-DR humanized mice expressing on their surface LE-, or SE-positive HLA-DR molecules (LE-Tg and SE-Tg mice, respectively). As supplementary Fig. 8 demonstrates, in the presence of IFN-γ, BMDMs from LE-Tg mice, but not from control, SE-Tg mice, showed increased gene expression of several known SLE-associated IFN-I genes, such as Ifi44, Ifi44l, and Irf7, along with markedly curtailed expression of Dnase1l3, a gene known to protect against SLE in both humans and mice4547.

IFN-γ has been long found to contribute to SLE disease development in both humans and mice15,16. Given the observed obligatory co-factor role of IFN-γ in vitro at the transcriptome and cell function levels as noted above, we proceeded to determining its in vivo effect in Tg mice. Intraperitoneal administration of IFN-γ resulted in increased serum levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies in LE-Tg, but not in SE-Tg mice (Fig. 7f, g), without a significant difference between male and female mice (Fig. 7h). IFN-γ-treated LE-Tg mice developed glomerulonephritis, as evidenced by proteinuria (Fig. 7i) and histopathology (Fig. 7j, k). Specifically, examination of kidney sections of LE-Tg mice treated for 24 weeks with IFN-γ showed increased glomerulitis with mesangial and/or endocapillary hypercellularity, crescent formation and immune deposits, as compared to LE-Tg mice treated with PBS, or SE-Tg mice treated with PBS or IFN-γ (Fig. 7k). In addition, kidney sections of LE-Tg mice treated with IFN-γ showed increased glomerular C3 deposits compared to LE-Tg mice treated with PBS, or SE-Tg mice treated with either PBS or IFN-γ (Fig. 7l, m).

Thus, taken together, the findings of this study demonstrate that in the presence of IFN-γ, the LE activates lupus signature transcriptomes and a cascade of lupus-associated cellular events in vitro in an allele-specific manner. When exposed to IFN-γ in vivo, naïve transgenic mice carrying the LE-coding SLE risk allele DRB1*0301 develop serological and histological findings analogous to human SLE. A proposed model is illustrated graphically in Fig. 7n.

Discussion

It has been long proposed that the mechanistic basis of HLA-disease association in lupus involves the presentation of putative self or foreign antigens that lead to an adaptive immune system-mediated target organ damage. The new insight offered by this study is that an entire cascade of SLE-associated events, including transcriptional, cellular, serological, and clinical manifestations, can be triggered, independent of antigen presentation, by a short epitope coded by allele DRB1*03:01, known as a major risk factor in human SLE.

Studying mouse and human macrophage cell lines stimulated with short synthetic peptides corresponding to the TAHR coded by three DRB1 alleles, as well as BMDMs derived from transgenic mouse lines that express physiologically folded distinct allelic HLA-DR molecules, we demonstrated allele-specific activation of a cascade of pathogenic events that includes transcriptional, cellular and disease phenomes that closely resemble human SLE and its experimental mouse models. Given that synthetic peptides are incapable of presenting antigens, and the fact that macrophage cell cultures are devoid of T cells, these findings support a disease-relevant, DRB1 allele-specific, antigen presentation-independent mechanism.

Consistent with its known effects in human SLE and experimental models of the disease15,16, IFN-γ was identified here as an obligatory co-factor for LE-activated transcriptional and cell biology effects. In this context, it is of interest that while both Model A (epitope + IFN-γ versus IFN-γ alone) and Model B (epitope + IFN-γ versus epitope alone) of RNA-seq data analysis uncovered bioinformatics evidence of a lupus signature transcriptome activation by the LE, Model B was found to be more robust in both mouse and human macrophages. One possible explanation might be that Model B more closely mimics the physiologic conditions in vivo, where the expression levels of DRB1-coded HLA-DR molecules is relatively constant, while IFN-γ levels could vary periodically, secondary to fluctuating environmental conditions. It is plausible that such changing circumstances could allow the LE to realize its SLE-triggering potential. Further research into this question, and more detailed mapping of the LE pathway and its crosstalk with IFN-γ-activated pathways, will help to dissect the respective roles of LE and IFN-γ and the mechanism of their interaction in SLE.

The LE overcame strain and species barriers, as the effects of this human gene product could be found in mouse (RAW 264.7 and BMDMs of diverse mouse strains) as well as human (THP-1) cells. Additionally, LE effects were found both in cell lines (RAW 264.7 and THP-1) and primary cells (BMDMs). This versatility attests to the fundamental nature of the mechanisms involved in LE-activated events. It is noteworthy that the MHC Cusp theory discussed below is partly based on the hypothesis that class II β chain TAHRs may have preserved fundamental, non-antigen presenting functions through evolution, consistent with the principles of trans-species polymorphism11,48,49.

Different from the strong female preponderance in human SLE, here, LE effects on anti-dsDNA antibody levels showed no difference between male and female mice. The reason for this apparent discrepancy is unknown and requires further study; however, it is worth mentioning that although a higher incidence and severity of SLE disease is well documented in female mice in some experimental models such as NZBW50, sex bias is less prominent in the MRL/lpr model51. Notably, a large genome-wide association study involving genotype data from over 27,000 individuals identified no gender-based differential SLE risk for any HLA allele52, suggesting that gender bias in humans involves mechanisms influenced by non-HLA risk factors.

The penetrance of nephritis in IFN-γ-treated LE-Tg mice was low, but statistically significant. It is worth noting that anti-dsDNA antibody formation, proteinuria histopathology and immunofluorescence findings, specifically in LE-Tg mice, were all consistent with LN development. We submit that LE-Tg + IFN-γ may not be a robust model of murine SLE, and there are several popular models with higher penetrance and disease severity. However, our LN data are not presented to propose a new robust lupus model, but rather to substantiate the disease relevance of the in vitro data. Susceptibility and disease severity in SLE are multifactorial. It might be helpful to explore in future studies whether the LE can act as a disease facilitator in established models of SLE.

This study has focused on DRB1*03:01, the best characterized and the single most significant (OR = 1.87; p = 1.17 × 10−58)9 SLE-associated HLA allele. However, it should be mentioned that SLE has been reported to associate with other HLA genes as well. While some of these associations are attributable to the strong linkage disequilibrium in the MHC region, DRB1*15:01 has been found to independently associate with the disease as well (OR = 1.33; p = 1.92 × 10−12)9. The mechanistic basis of that association is unknown and is beyond the scope of this first study. It is worth noting, however, that a recent association study of SLE using Immunochip genotyping data52 identified differential risk associations at a single amino acid residue level between the DRB1*15 allele, in which risk-associated residues were found primarily inside the peptide-binding pocket, and allele DRB1*03:01, in which risk-associated residues were found primarily at the region 70-77 of the DRβ chain, overlapping with the cusp region (amino acid residues 65-79).

The distinct topologies of SLE-critical amino acid residues coded by the two alleles, along with our findings that the 65-79*LE, but not an equivalent peptide corresponding to DRB1*15:01, suppressed ATP cellular levels (Supplementary Fig. 1d), together suggest that the functional effects on disease risk by DRB1*03:01 and DRB1*15:01 are dissimilar. While allele DRB1*03:01 encodes a disease-driving LE, as demonstrated here, allele DRB1*15:01 may contribute to disease risk through antigen presentation. The apparent disparities between the respective functional effects of the two alleles on disease risk might also provide a mechanistic basis for an imputation-based conclusion that DRB1*03:01/DRB1*15 heterozygosity confers a greater risk for SLE than either DRB1*03:01/DRB1*03:01 or DRB1*15/DRB1*15 homozygosity52.

Different from the empirical data-based model presented here, the above-mentioned gene association study suggested that SLE disease risk conferred by allele DRB1*03:01 is attributable to a single amino acid residue located at the peptide binding groove: Tyr26 in the risk allele DRB1*03:01 versus Phe26 in the non-risk allele, DRB1*03:02, indirectly implicating antigen presentation. That conclusion was offered because both alleles share an identical amino acid sequence in the TAHR but differ by a single amino acid residue in position 26, located at the DR3 peptide groove52.

That hypothesis is seemingly in conflict with our findings. However, despite continuous refining efforts, the accuracy of single nucleotide polymorphism-based imputation of HLA genotyping, especially in respect to the DRB1 locus53,54, remains uncertain. Nonetheless, irrespective of the reliability of computational HLA fine genotyping, the theory examined here and the antigen presentation hypothesis as mechanistic bases for HLA-disease association are mutually non-exclusive, as previously discussed10,11,20,55. Indeed, targeted sequencing efforts to examine the genetic association within the HLA class II region in lupus identified a regulatory genetic variant located between HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQA1 that could explain the majority of the genetic risk in this locus56. This effect is tagged by the SNP rs9271593 within an intergenic regulatory locus known as XL9 separating the HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQA1 genes. The lupus-associated variant in this SNP tags the lupus-associated classical alleles DRB1*03:01 and DRB1*15:01, and is associated with increased expression of HLA-DRB1, HLA-DQA1, and HLA-DQB1 in monocyte-derived dendritic cells56. These findings support an antigen presentation independent effect of the HLA class II genetic effect in lupus, consistent with our findings.

It should be noted that DRB1*03:01 is associated with many other autoimmune diseases besides lupus. We submit that as demonstrated here, the LE activates several fundamental cell biology aberrations (e.g., UPR, mitochondrial perturbations), which are implicated in many diseases besides SLE. Additionally, SLE risk, like many other autoimmune conditions, depends on multiple genes, as well as environmental factors and disease phenomes are likely determined by intricate gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. The fact that KEGG pathway transcriptome analyses of LE-activated macrophages identified several other diseases that are known to associate with DRB1*03:01 in both human and mouse macrophages (Fig. 2f) lend further support to the mechanism proposed here.

This study demonstrates an allele-specific, antigen presentation-independent cascade of events that culminate in the development of serological and tissue damage akin to human SLE. The trigger of this cascade of events involves a short epitope coded by HLA-DRB1*03:01, the single most significant genetic risk factor for SLE in diverse populations. Our model (Fig. 7n) proposes that a combination of necroptotic cell death with increased abundance of free DNA fragments plus a proinflammatory milieu, together stimulate anti-dsDNA antibody formation. The model further proposes that those antibodies can form immune complexes with DNA fragments and precipitate in glomeruli, and cause LN. Importantly, the curtailed IFN-γ-activated transcription of Dnase1l3, - a gene that codes for an extracellular DNA degradation enzyme, whose deficiency is strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of human SLE47 and murine disease models46- in BMDM of LE-Tg (Supplementary Fig. 8) suggests a possible facilitating mechanism of anti-dsDNA antibody formation by increasing antigenic (DNA) exposure. This scenario deserves further research.

The findings of this study might open the door to better understanding of the precise molecular and genetic mechanisms involved in HLA-disease association. Exploration of such mechanisms in the context of human diseases could potentially identify new preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic solutions.

Methods

Mice

Transgenic (Tg) mice were generated as previously described24,57,58 and donated by Dr. Chella David and Dr. Veena Taneja from the Mayo Clinic. These Tg mouse lines, expressing cell surface heterodimeric HLA-DR molecules made of a monomorphic DRα chain and a polymorphic DRβ chain coded by the human HLA-DR1*0301, HLA-DR4*04:01 or HLA-DR4*04:02 alleles, are referred to as LE-Tg, SE-Tg and PE-Tg, respectively.

Transgenic lines LE-Tg, SE-Tg and PE-Tg were developed using classical pronuclear microinjection. For line LE-Tg, the transgene was injected into (C57BL/6 x DBA/2)F1 embryos59. Lines SE-Tg and PE-Tg were created injecting (C57BL/10 x SWR)F1 embryos57,58. Genomic DNA from four representative mice from each line was analyzed using the MiniMUGA SNP array, containing ~9,700 SNPs60. The three lines showed to be highly inbred (98.5% to 99.5% homozygous genotypes) and mice from each line were almost genetically identical.

In agreement with the history of breeding the genomes of the three lines are very similar and resemble recombinant inbred strains with C57BL/6J (B6J) and C57BL/10J (B10J) as main backgrounds. After the analysis of the 366 polymorphic SNPs present in the MiniMUGA array it was estimated that the percentage backgrounds were 55.6% C57BL/10J and 44.4% C57BL/6J for line LE-Tg; 59.6% C57BL/10J and 40.4% C57BL/6J for line SE-Tg; and 69.1% C57BL/10J and 31.5% C57BL/6J for line PE-Tg. Using a special function from a proprietary spreadsheet developed by Transnetyx, we could rule out the presence of “diagnostic SNPs” from C57BL/6N (NIH substrain) in the three Tg lines. With the same tool we could also rule out traces of DBA/2 alleles in line 0301. However, we estimated the presence of a very small (~1%) proportion of SWR/J genome in lines SE-Tg and PE-Tg.

WT C57BL/6J (B6J, strain # 000664), C57BL/10J (B10J, strain # 000665) and SWR/J (strain # 000689) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratories.

All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free and temperature-controlled (25 °C) conditions with a 12 h light-dark cycle. Ex vivo experiments were carried out using 10–12-week-old male mice. For in vivo experiments, female or male mice were used at 8 weeks of age. Mice were administered intraperitoneal (IP) injections containing 100 μl of either PBS, or recombinant mouse IFN-γ (10 µg per injection) twice a week. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Michigan.

Reagents

All materials used, along with vendor names and catalog numbers are listed in Supplementary Table 5.

Cell culture

THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 culture medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Corning), 2 mmol/L of glutamine (Gibco) and the antibiotics 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Pen Strep, Gibco), based on a previously described protocol20,61. Briefly, cells were seeded and differentiated using 85 nM Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate (PMA, Sigma) for 3 days, media was replaced, and cells were allowed to rest for 5 additional days. The medium was replaced and cells were subjected to treatments with 100 µg/mL of the peptides 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE with or without recombinant human IFN-γ (10 ng/mL).

RAW 264.7 cells were cultured in DMEM culture medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Corning) and 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin (Pen Strep, Gibco). Cells were plated and treated with 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE (100 µg/mL) with or without recombinant mouse IFN-γ (5 ng/mL).

BMDM differentiation

For primary macrophage experiments, bone marrow cells isolated from femurs and tibias were used to generate bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs), as previously20. For ATP experiments, bone marrow cells were cultured in 6-well plates (2 × 106 cells per well) in α-Minimum Essential Medium (α-MEM), supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (all from Invitrogen), in the presence of recombinant mouse macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF, 10 ng/mL) for 3 days. Cell culture media were replaced daily. After 3 days, cells were treated with recombinant mouse IFN-γ, (5 ng/mL) for 24 h. For all other functional experiments, bone marrow cells were cultured in DMEM medium, supplemented with 20% (v/v) L929 cell conditioned media, 0.5% (v/v) pyruvate, 10% (v/v) FBS and 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (all from Invitrogen) for 3 days, as described previously20. Thereafter, cells were plated for 24 h, followed by treatment with IFN-γ (5 ng/mL) for 48–72 h.

RNA-Sequencing

Samples for RNA-seq were prepared and processed as previously described20. Briefly, RAW 264.7 cells were treated with 15mer ligands 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE (100 μg/mL) with or without IFN-γ (5 ng/mL). Media were refreshed after 48 h, and at 72 h, cells were lysed with Trizol (Invitrogen). Total RNA was isolated using the Direct-ZolTM RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA from THP-1 cells was isolated 72 h after treatment with 15mer ligands 65-79*LE, 65-79*SE or 65-79*PE (100 μg/mL) with or without IFN-γ (10 ng/mL) using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) according to the vendor instructions. Genomic DNA was removed using the Turbo DNA-Free kit (Ambion). All samples used for library generation had an RNA integrity number of 7.5 or higher.

The TruSeq Stranded mRNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina) was used for library generation, according to manufacturer’s protocol, using 200 ng of total RNA. For each sample, 100 bp single-end reads were generated using Illumina’s HiSeq2500v4. Raw read counts were obtained using featureCounts from the Rsubread1.5.0p3 package and Gencode-M12 gene annotations (RAW 264.7) or featureCounts from the Rsubread-1.6.1 package and Gencode28-hg38 gene annotations (THP-1) using only uniquely aligned reads. Data normalization and differential expression analysis were performed using DESeq2-1.16.1 within R-3.4.1 using an adjusted p-value threshold of 0.05. Mouse gene annotations were verified using the MGI database (http://www.Informatics.jax.org/index.shtml)20, only protein-encoding genes were considered. Differentially expressed genes with a fold change (FC) of > 1.5 and adjusted p-value (Padj) of < 0.05 were used for Gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis using the DAVID bioinformatics database (version 6.8, https://david.ncifcrf.gov/)62. GO and KEGG terms with a false discovery rate (FDR) of < 5% (< 0.05) were considered significant. Unsupervised clustering of DEGs was visualized using a web server heatmapper (http://www.heatmapper.ca)63 using average linkage and Pearson correlation distance.

Upstream regulator analysis

Upstream regulator analysis was performed using Advaita Bio’s iPathwayGuide (iPG, Advaita Bioinformatics, MI, https://advaitabio.com/ipathwayguide/)64. All differentially expressed genes were used to predict upstream regulators that are likely to be activated. Upstream regulators with an adjusted p-value of <0.05 were included in the analysis.

qRT-PCR

cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Thermo Fisher) according to the vendor’s protocol. qRT-PCR was performed on a StepOnePlus or a CFX384 Touch (Bio-Rad) Real-Time PCR system, with a total reaction volume of 10 or 20 µL using Fast SYBRTM Green Master Mix (all reagents from Applied Biosystems). The primers used are listed in the KEY RESOURCES table. Analysis was done with StepOne or CFX Maestro Software using the ΔΔCT method.

Cell death and viability assays

Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release from cells was measured using the Cytotoxicity Detection KitPLUS (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Absorbance was measured at 490 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek, Synergy™ H1). Cytotoxicity was calculated as described65.

Cell viability was evaluated using the methylthiazolyldiphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) method66,67. Briefly, cells were rinsed with PBS and a 0.5% (w/v) MTT solution was added for 3 h. Next, formazan crystals formed were solubilized with isopropanol (Sigma) and optical density was measured at 540 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek, Synergy™ H1).

Caspase-3 activity was determined using EnzChek™ Caspase-3 Assay Kit #2 (Thermo Fisher).

Mitochondrial function assays

Intracellular ATP levels were measured with the ATPlite Luminescence Assay System (PerkinElmer) following the vendor protocol. Mitochondrial membrane potential was determined using the tetramethylrhodamine (TMRE) dye (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Mitochondrial ROS was measured using MitoSOX Red superoxide indicator (Molecular Probes) following the supplier’s protocol.

Immunoblots

Cells were collected and lysed with RIPA buffer (Sigma) containing phosphatase inhibitor phosSTOP and protease inhibitors cOmplete mini EDTA-free (Roche). Protein concentration was quantified using RC DC™ Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad). Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE Gels (Thermo Fisher) and transferred to PVDF Western Blotting membranes (Roche). The membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma). Blots were incubated overnight with primary antibodies listed in the KEY RESOURCES table, followed by 1 h incubation with appropriate secondary antibody. Membranes were developed using SuperSignalTM West Pico Plus ECL substrate (Thermo Scientific) or ClarityTM Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad). Images were acquired using the Omega Lum™ C Imaging System (Gel Company) or ChemiDoc™ Imaging System (Bio-Rad).

Immunocytochemistry for ubiquitinylated proteins

Cells were cultured on cover glass and fixed with a 4% paraformaldehyde solution. Fixed cells were subsequently permeabilized with 0.1% triton-X100, blocked in 2% BSA, followed by overnight incubation with mono and polyubiquitinylated conjugates monoclonal antibody (1:200) and 1 h incubation with secondary antibody, labelled with Alexa Fluor 647. Coverslips were mounted onto slides using Prolong Diamond with DAPI (Invitrogen). Cells were imaged using a Nikon E800 Epifluorescence microscope.

Quantification of DNA damage

DNA damage was quantified using a Comet Assay (Trevigen), based on previously described protocols68,69. The slides were observed by fluorescence microscopy (Cytation 5, GFP filter). A total of 100 cells in each slide were scored according to the length and intensity of the tail in relation to the head as described68,69. Each cell was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 by two independent observers blinded with regards to the samples and the average from both counts was used for calculation69.

Quantification of cytokines, nitrites, and Serum anti-dsDNA-IgG levels

Cell supernatants were used for quantification of cytokines (IL1-β, IL-6 and TNF-α) by commercial ELISA kits following the protocols provided by the manufacturer (KEY RESOURCES table). To measure nitrite concentrations, cell culture supernatants were collected and immediately subjected to a Griess Reagent assay (Promega), according to the suppliers’ protocol.

Serum anti-dsDNA-IgG levels were measured at week 5, 10, 16, 20 and 24 using an ELISA Kit (Alpha Diagnostic International) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Renal histopathology and immunofluorescence

Renal histopathology was interpreted as described before70. Briefly, mouse kidneys were harvested after 24 weeks of treatment, fixed in formalin, and 3 µm sections were stained with periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) or hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The kidneys were scored for glomerulitis, extracapillary proliferation and mesangial expansion by a pathologist (E.F.), who was blinded with regards to the experimental groups. Images were taken at a 400 × magnification, with a BX41 microscope (Olympus) and an Olympus DP73 camera using cellSens imaging software.

Complement deposition was quantified by C3 immunofluorescence. Five µm frozen sections were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-C3 (Immunology Consultants Laboratory) for 1 h at 4˚C, followed by Hoechst (Invitrogen) counterstaining. Images were captured by a Nikon E800 Epifluorescence and Brightfield microscope (Nikon, Melville, NY) using a 10x objective. Glomerular C3 staining was scored on a 0-3 basis in a blinded manner in at least eight glomeruli per section. Positive controls were identically processed using frozen kidney sections from 28 weeks old female New Zealand Mixed (NZM) 2328 mice.

Statistics and Reproducibility

Raw data related to all graphed figures are specified in Supplementary Data File 4. Unless otherwise specified, data are presented as mean value ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All statistical analyses were performed using the Graph Pad Prism 8.0 statistical software (Graph Pad Software: https://www.graphpad.com/). One-way, or two-way ANOVA were used for analysis of normally distributed in vitro data. The statistical significance of the differences of anti-dsDNA IgG (Figs. 7f, h) levels and albumin-to-creatinine ratios (ACR) (Fig. 7i) among the different in vivo mouse treatment groups was analyzed by a Wilcoxon sign rank test, using the measured levels in PBS-treated LE-Tg, and the measured levels in IFN-γ-treated SE-Tg mice as the theoretical medians for statistical analysis compared to the measured levels in IFN-γ-treated LE-Tg mice, under the assumption that treatment of LE-Tg with IFN-γ induces higher levels. The significance of the differences in renal histopathology scores among the different mouse treatment groups (Fig. 7j) was analyzed by a Wilcoxon sign rank test as well, using a theoretical median of zero under the assumption that the various treatments do not induce any glomerular pathology. For all experiments, the statistical test used and the number of replicates are indicated in the figure legends. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Reporting Summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

42003_2022_3717_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (5.1KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (3.9MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (4.9MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (5MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4 (78.7KB, xlsx)
Reporting Summary (2MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Chela David and Veena Taneja from the Mayo Clinic for providing transgenic mice; Kelsey Rampalski and Claire McCrate-Heath at the University of Michigan for technical assistance; Drs. Terrance O’Hanlon and Ejaz Shamim from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA, for useful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Extramural Program of the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (Grants R01AR059085, R61AR073014, R33AR073014, R01AR074930) to J.H., the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Extramural Program (Contract HHSN273201600123P) to J.H., and the Intramural Research Program at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH (Grant ES101074) to F.W.M. B.M.S was supported by Training Grant T32AR07080 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author contributions

J.H. conceived the project. J.H., B.M.S., B.K. and V.v.D. designed the cell biology experiments. J.H., V.v.D., B.M.S. and A.H.S. designed the RNA-seq experiments. J.M.K. and J.H. designed the C3 immunofluorescence experiment. V.v.D. performed RNA-seq bioinformatics analysis. B.M.S., V.v.D., J.C.F., B.K., J.L. and R.A.M.F. performed the experiments and statistical evaluations. F.B. performed mouse genomics analyses. E.A.F. read and scored renal histopathology, J.H. and F.W.M. provided funding. J.H. wrote the paper with input from all co-authors. All authors reviewed the findings and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Joanna Hester and Anam Akhtar.

Data availability

RNA-seq datasets generated in this manuscript were deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus71 and are accessible through GEO accession number GSE173877. Source data behind the all the graphs in the paper can be found in Supplementary Data 4. Uncropped blots are available in Supplementary Figure 9. Additional data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Competing interests

J.H. is consulting to Zydus-Cadila, a Licensee of unrelated patents owned by the Regents of the University of Michigan. J.M.K has received grant funding from Q32 Bio, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, and ROME Therapeutics, and Ventus Therapeutics. She has done consulting work for Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKlein, Gilead, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, and Lupus Therapeutics. All other authors have no competing interests to declare.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Bruna Miglioranza Scavuzzi, Vincent van Drongelen.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-022-03717-x.

References

  • 1.Tsokos GC. Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011;365:2110–2121. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1100359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Perl A, Gergely P, Jr, Nagy G, Koncz A, Banki K. Mitochondrial hyperpolarization: a checkpoint of T-cell life, death and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 2004;25:360–367. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Navid F, Colbert R. Causes and consequences of endoplasmic reticulum stress in rheumatic disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2017;13:25–40. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tsokos GC, Lo MS, Reis PC, Sullivan KE. New insights into the immunopathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2016;12:716–730. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wang Y-F, et al. Identification of 38 novel loci for systemic lupus erythematosus and genetic heterogeneity between ancestral groups. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:772. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21049-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yin X, et al. Meta-analysis of 208370 East Asians identifies 113 susceptibility loci for systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;80:632–640. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Barcellos LF, et al. High-density SNP screening of the major histocompatibility complex in systemic lupus erythematosus demonstrates strong evidence for independent susceptibility regions. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ghodke-Puranik Y, Niewold TB. Immunogenetics of systemic lupus erythematosus: A comprehensive review. J. Autoimmun. 2015;64:125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morris DL, et al. Unraveling Multiple MHC Gene Associations with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Model Choice Indicates a Role for HLA Alleles and Non-HLA Genes in Europeans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2012;91:778–793. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Almeida DED, Holoshitz J. MHC molecules in health and disease: At the cusp of a paradigm shift. Self Nonself. 2011;2:43–48. doi: 10.4161/self.2.1.15757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Holoshitz J. The Quest for Better Understanding of HLA-Disease Association: Scenes from a Road Less Travelled By. Disco. Med. 2013;16:93–101. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mills CD. M1 and M2 Macrophages: Oracles of Health and Disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2012;32:463–488. doi: 10.1615/CritRevImmunol.v32.i6.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li F, Yang Y, Zhu X, Huang L, Xu J. Macrophage Polarization Modulates Development of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2015;37:1279–1288. doi: 10.1159/000430251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu Y, Kaplan MJ. Cardiovascular disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: an update. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 2018;30:441–448. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Karonitsch T, et al. Activation of the interferon-gamma signaling pathway in systemic lupus erythematosus peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:1463–1471. doi: 10.1002/art.24449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Peng SL, Moslehi J, Craft J. Roles of interferon-gamma and interleukin-4 in murine lupus. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;99:1936–1946. doi: 10.1172/JCI119361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carrier N, et al. The DERAA HLA-DR alleles in patients with early polyarthritis: protection against severe disease and lack of association with rheumatoid arthritis autoantibodies. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:698–707. doi: 10.1002/art.24353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Woude Dvd, et al. Protection against anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis is predominantly associated with HLA-DRB1*1301: a meta-analysis of HLA-DRB1 associations with anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive and anti-citrullinated protein antibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis in four European populations. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1236–1245. doi: 10.1002/art.27366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Furukawa H, et al. The role of common protective alleles HLA-DRB1*13 among systemic autoimmune diseases. Genes Immun. 2017;18:1–7. doi: 10.1038/gene.2016.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Drongelen VV, et al. HLA-DRB1 allelic epitopes that associate with autoimmune disease risk or protection activate reciprocal macrophage polarization. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79139-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gregersen PK, Silver J, Winchester RJ. The shared epitope hypothesis. An approach to understanding the molecular genetics of susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1987;30:1205–1213. doi: 10.1002/art.1780301102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ashton JJ, Latham K, Beattie RM, Ennis S. Review article: the genetics of the human leucocyte antigen region in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharm. Ther. 2019;50:885–900. doi: 10.1111/apt.15485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Noble JA, et al. The role of HLA class II genes in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: molecular analysis of 180 Caucasian, multiplex families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996;59:1134–1148. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kong YC, et al. HLA-DRB1 polymorphism determines susceptibility to autoimmune thyroiditis in transgenic mice: definitive association with HLA-DRB1*0301 (DR3) gene. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184:1167–1172. doi: 10.1084/jem.184.3.1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Thibault DL, et al. IRF9 and STAT1 are required for IgG autoantibody production and B cell expression of TLR7 in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2008;118:1417–1426. doi: 10.1172/JCI30065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Barrat FJ, Crow MK, Ivashkiv LB. Interferon target-gene expression and epigenomic signatures in health and disease. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:1574–1583. doi: 10.1038/s41590-019-0466-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wang T, et al. Identification of Regulatory Modules That Stratify Lupus Disease Mechanism through Integrating Multi-Omics Data. Mol. Ther. - Nucleic Acids. 2020;19:318–329. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Neubert K, et al. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib depletes plasma cells and protects mice with lupus-like disease from nephritis. Nat. Med. 2008;14:748–755. doi: 10.1038/nm1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lee WS, et al. A pathogenic role for ER stress‐induced autophagy and ER chaperone GRP78/BiP in T lymphocyte systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2014;97:425–433. doi: 10.1189/jlb.6A0214-097R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Roca FJ, Whitworth LJ, Redmond S, Jones AA, Ramakrishnan L. TNF Induces Pathogenic Programmed Macrophage Necrosis in Tuberculosis through a Mitochondrial-Lysosomal-Endoplasmic Reticulum Circuit. Cell. 2019;178:1344–1361. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhou Z, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation regulates mitochondrial dynamics in brown adipocytes. Science. 2020;368:54–60. doi: 10.1126/science.aay2494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schwartz D, et al. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Drug Disco. 2017;17:843–862. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sedlackova L, Korolchuk VI. Mitochondrial quality control as a key determinant of cell survival. Biochim Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2019;1866:575–587. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Locatelli, S. L. et al. Dual PI3K/ERK inhibition induces necroptotic cell death of Hodgkin Lymphoma cells through IER3 downregulation. Sci Rep6, 35745 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Mistry P, Kaplan MJ. Cell death in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Clin. Immunol. 2017;185:59–73. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bell BD, et al. FADD and caspase-8 control the outcome of autophagic signaling in proliferating T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:16677–16682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808597105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vanden Berghe T, Linkermann A, Jouan-Lanhouet S, Walczak H, Vandenabeele P. Regulated necrosis: the expanding network of non-apoptotic cell death pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:135–147. doi: 10.1038/nrm3737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fan H, et al. Activation-induced necroptosis contributes to B-cell lymphopenia in active systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:1–12. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Senft D, Ronai ZeA. UPR, autophagy, and mitochondria crosstalk underlies the ER stress response. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gordaliza‐Alaguero I, Cantó C, Zorzano A. Metabolic implications of organelle–mitochondria communication. EMBO Rep. 2019;20:e47928. doi: 10.15252/embr.201947928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Namgaladze D, Khodzhaeva V, Brüne B. ER-Mitochondria Communication in Cells of the Innate Immune System. Cells. 2019;8:1–21. doi: 10.3390/cells8091088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kubota K, et al. Suppressive effects of 4-phenylbutyrate on the aggregation of Pael receptors and endoplasmic reticulum stress. J. Neurochem. 2006;97:1259–1268. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.03782.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bonnemaison M, Marks-Nelson E, Boesen E. Sodium 4-phenylbutyrate treatment protects against renal injury in NZBWF1 mice. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 2019;133:167–180. doi: 10.1042/CS20180562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Choi Y, Jung J, Lee E, Kim K, Yoo W. 4-phenylbutyric acid mediates therapeutic effect in systemic lupus erythematosus: Observations in an experimental murine lupus model. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021;21:1–9. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hartl, J. et al. Autoantibody-mediated impairment of DNASE1L3 activity in sporadic systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Exp. Med.218, 138 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 46.Sisirak V, et al. Digestion of Chromatin in Apoptotic Cell Microparticles Prevents Autoimmunity. Cell. 2016;166:88–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Al-Mayouf S, et al. Loss-of-function variant in DNASE1L3 causes a familial form of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genet. 2011;43:1186–1188. doi: 10.1038/ng.975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Klein J. Origin of major histocompatibility complex polymorphism: the trans-species hypothesis. Hum. Immunol. 1987;19:155–162. doi: 10.1016/0198-8859(87)90066-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Těšický M, Vinkler M. Trans-Species Polymorphism in Immune Genes: General Pattern or MHC-Restricted Phenomenon? J. Immunol. Res. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/838035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Lambert PH, Dixon FJ. Pathogenesis of the glomerulonephritis of NZB/W mice. J. Exp. Med. 1968;127:507–522. doi: 10.1084/jem.127.3.507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Nusbaum JS, et al. Sex Differences in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Epidemiology, Clinical Considerations, and Disease Pathogenesis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2020;95:384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Langefeld CD, et al. Transancestral mapping and genetic load in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1–18. doi: 10.1038/ncomms16021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Vlachopoulou E, et al. Evaluation of HLA-DRB1 imputation using a Finnish dataset. Tissue Antigens. 2014;83:350–355. doi: 10.1111/tan.12343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pappas DJ, et al. Significant variation between SNP-based HLA imputations in diverse populations: the last mile is the hardest. Pharmacogenomics J. 2018;18:367–376. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2017.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Drongelen VV, Ali WH, Holoshitz J. Uncovering a Shared Epitope-Activated Protein Citrullination Pathway. J. Immunol. 2020;205:579–586. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1901108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Raj P, et al. Regulatory polymorphisms modulate the expression of HLA class II molecules and promote autoimmunity. Elife. 2016;5:1–52. doi: 10.7554/eLife.12089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Pan S, Trejo T, Hansen J, Smart M, David CS. HLA-DR4 (DRB1*0401) transgenic mice expressing an altered CD4-binding site: specificity and magnitude of DR4-restricted T cell response. J. Immunol. 1998;161:2925–2929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Taneja V, et al. HLA-DRB1*0402 (DW10) transgene protects collagen-induced arthritis-susceptible H2Aq and DRB1*0401 (DW4) transgenic mice from arthritis. J. Immunol. 2003;171:4431–4438. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.8.4431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Strauss G, Vignali D, Schönrich G, Hämmerling G. Negative and positive selection by HLA-DR3(DRw17) molecules in transgenic mice. Immunogenetics. 1994;40:104–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sigmon J, et al. Content and Performance of the MiniMUGA Genotyping Array: A New Tool To Improve Rigor and Reproducibility in Mouse Research. Genetics. 2020;216:905–930. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Daigneault M, Preston JA, Marriott HM, Whyte MKB, Dockrell DH. The identification of markers of macrophage differentiation in PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived macrophages. PLoS One. 2010;5:1–10. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Babicki S, et al. Heatmapper: web-enabled heat mapping for all. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:147–153. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ahsan, S. & Draghici, S. Identifying Significantly Impacted Pathways and Putative Mechanisms with iPathwayGuide. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 7.15.11–17.15.30, (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 65.Chan FK-M, Moriwaki K, Rosa MJD. Detection of Necrosis by Release of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Activity. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013;979:65–70. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-290-2_7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Löster K, Horstkorte R. Enzymatic quantification of cell–matrix and cell–cell adhesion. Micron. 2000;31:41–53. doi: 10.1016/S0968-4328(99)00062-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods. 1983;65:55–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Olive PL, Banáth JP. The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:23–29. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair. Mol. Biotechnol. 2004;26:249–261. doi: 10.1385/MB:26:3:249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rohraff DM, et al. Inhibition of EZH2 Ameliorates Lupus-Like Disease in MRL/lpr Mice. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71:1681–1690. doi: 10.1002/art.40931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Edgar, R., Domrachev, M. & Lash, A. in Nucleic Acids Res30, 207–210 (2002). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

42003_2022_3717_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (5.1KB, pdf)

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1 (3.9MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 2 (4.9MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 3 (5MB, xlsx)
Supplementary Data 4 (78.7KB, xlsx)
Reporting Summary (2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

RNA-seq datasets generated in this manuscript were deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus71 and are accessible through GEO accession number GSE173877. Source data behind the all the graphs in the paper can be found in Supplementary Data 4. Uncropped blots are available in Supplementary Figure 9. Additional data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.


Articles from Communications Biology are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES