Skip to main content
Development & Reproduction logoLink to Development & Reproduction
. 2022 Jun 30;26(2):91–98. doi: 10.12717/DR.2022.26.2.91

PCR Analysis for Genetic Distances of Two Charybdis Crab Populations

Jong-Man Yoon 1,
PMCID: PMC9336212  PMID: 35950169

Abstract

Genomic DNA (gDNA) set apart from two populations of Korean Charybdis crab (Charybdis japonica) was augmented by PCR experiments. The five oligonucleotides primers (ONT-primers) were spent to yield the number of unique loci shared to each crab population (ULSECP) and number of loci shared by the two crab populations (LSTCP). 305 fragments (FRAGs) were identified in the Charybdis crab population A (CCPA), and 344 in the Charybdis crab population B (CCPB): 44 number of ULSECP (14.43%) in the CCPA and 110 (31.98%) in the CCPB. 44 number of LSTCP, with an average of 8.8 per primer, were detected in the two crab populations. The bandsharing (BS) value between entity’s no. 01 and no. 10 was the lowest (0.371) between the two CCPs. The average bandsharing (ABS) values of individuals in the CCPA (0.575±0.014) were lesser than in those originated from the CCPB (0.705±0.011) (p < 0.05). The polar hierarchical dendrogram (PHD) achieved by the five ONT-primers denotes three genetic clusters (GCs): cluster I (CHARYBCRAB 01, 04, 05, 06, and 08), cluster II (CHARYBCRAB 02, 03, 07, 09, 10, and 11) and cluster III (CHARYBCRAB 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22). The shortest genetic distance (GD) displaying significant molecular difference (MD) was between individuals CHARYBCRAB no. 18 and CHARYBCRAB no. 17 (0.055).

Keywords: Bandsharing (BS) value, Charybdis japonica, Charybdis crab populations (CCP), Genetic clusters (GCs), Genetic distance (GD), Oligonucleotides primers (ONT-primers), Polar hierarchical dendrogram (PHD)

INTRODUCTION

Korean C. japonica is one of ecologically significant portunid crab species in the Yellow Sea, belonging to the family Portunidae, and the order Decapoda. In the environmental ecosystem, Charybdis crab is broadly inhabited in the seawater areas of the Korean peninsula, besides in some regions in the East China Sea, Taiwan, Malaysia and Hawaii. Apparently, the dorsal surface of shell is habitually smooth. The crab has very large and long both claws and the body color of this crab is light grey form. Since crabs are night-time organisms, they nestle under the grits, sandy soil and rocks of the shallow sea. Many explores have displayed that the change of water temperature by earth warmth, population density, tide embankment, thoughtless overhunting and environmental pollution are serious in the early larval development of this portunid crab (Yeon et al., 2011). Charybdis crab is one of commercial portunid crab in Korea all the year round.

However, notwithstanding their economic and ecological assessments, only a few data presently are existent, which are acknowledged as environmentally (Yeon et al., 2011), sitologically (Ho, 2001; Oh, 2002; Park et al., 2008), ecologically (Seo & Hong, 2009), morphologically (Heo et al., 2006), and behaviorally (Kim & Ko, 1987) compared to other crayfish species. Thus, there is a requirement to understand the genetic characters and more statistics of this crab in order to evaluate exactly the accurately genetic suggestion. Above all, the clustering analysis of the genetic distance (GD) between populations/species/genera of several teleost and crustaceans from the different geographic sites has been accomplished by means of PCR technique is a few quantity (Diaz-Jaimes & Uribe-Alcocer, 2003; Wang & Li, 2004; Wasko et al., 2004; Nagarajan et al., 2006; Upadhyay et al., 2006; Ghatak et al., 2007; Yoon et al., 2007; Kang & Yoon, 2013; Yoon, 2020; Jo & Yoon, 2021).

This scrutiny tries to illuminate the GDs and polymorphism within and between Charybdis crab collections. With the aim of accomplishment, this author achieved clustering analyses of Korean Charybdis crab (C. japonica) in the Yellow Sea of Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two assemblies of Charybdis crab (C. japonica) were taken from Seosan in the vicinity of the Yellow Sea of Korea. Two sample collections of crab muscle was gathered in disinfected cylinders, proximately positioned on cold ice, and retained at −79°C until required. PCR inquiry was achieved the genomic DNAs from 22 individuals, consuming different five oligonucleotides primers (ONT-primers). The extraction/refinement of genomic DNA (gDNA) was accomplished under the requirements described previously (Yoon, 2018). Proteinase K solution was involved to the tubes and gradually pipetted for some minutes.

Five ONT-primers (Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA, USA) was between 60%–70%. OPA-16 (5’-AGCCAGCGAA-3’), OPB-10 (5’-CTGCTGGGAC-3’), OPB-15 (5’-GGAGGGTGTT-3’), OPD-10 (5’-GGTCTACACC-3’), and OPD-20 (5’-ACCCGGTCAC-3’) were the primers spent to classify the unique loci shared to each crab population (ULSECP) and the amount of loci shared by the two crab populations (LSTCP) was estimated. PCR examination was executed on a recorded genomic thermal cycler (MJ Research, Waltham, MA, USA). DNA increase was executed with 27 μL example cylinders comprising 5 ng of template DNA, 20 μL of premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea), and 2 unit of primer. PCR outcomes of the increase feedback were distributed by electrophoresis for 30 min at 100 V in a 1.4% agarose gel, tainted with EtBr and pictured under ultra-violet beam, and took pictures of on a transilluminator using a gel evidence apparatus (PECA Products, Beloit, WI, USA).

Similarity matrixs (SMs) were established based on the data of bandsharing (BS) rates constructed by molecular analysis. Comparing the two lanes, the BS rate was appraised as surveys: BS = 2 (Nab) / (Na + Nb), where Nab signifies the amount of FMs shared by examples b and a; Na points out the total quantity of FMs in a; and Nb signifies the total quantity of FMs in example b. The median within-group correspondence was rated via pairwise matching inquiry between the parties within a group. A polar hierarchical dendrogram (PHD) was generated renowned on SMs to take a cluster tree using Systat version 10 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

GDNA set apart from two populations of Korean Charybdis crab (C. japonica) was augmented some rounds by PCR experiments. The fragment (FRAG) amounts in each size interval have been computed from the integrated FRAGs obtained with every five ONT-primers. The higher FRAG extents (>1,900 bp) are perceived in the Charybdis crab population A (CCPA), as shown in Fig. 1. Seven ONT-primers produced a sum of 884 FRAGs in the black rockfish species and 632 in the Hwanghae rockfish species, with a DNA FRAGs amount stretching from 150 to 2,200 bp (Yoon et al., 2007). The extents of the DNA FRAGs also varied roughly, from 90 to 2,400 bp in Gracilaria vermiculophylla and G. chorda (Kim & Yoon, 2018). Yoon (2018) also described that the more FRAG amounts (>1,100 bp) are not identified in di-population of the razor shellfish (Solen corneus). The five ONT-primers created a whole of 367 FRAGs in the innate pufferfish population and 211 FRAGs in the farmed pufferfish population, with genetic FRAG extents fluctuating from 50 bp to 1,300 bp (Yoon, 2020). The mean quantity of separate FRAGs per primer within the innate and cultivated river pufferfish population was 14.68 and 8.44, individually (Yoon, 2020). The number of the FRAGs showed 354 and 390 DNA countable FRAGs, respectively, extending from 100 bp to 1,600 bp for the Yeosu and Jinhae populations of the arkshell species (Yoon, 2021a).

Fig. 1. Dispersal of FRAG sizes of CCPA and CCPB from the Yellow Sea of Korea.

Fig. 1.

Solid grey lines: CCPA (CRAB01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, and 11). Solid black lines (CRAB12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22): CCPB. The FRAG numbers in each extent break have been figured from the united FRAGs obtained with every five ONT-primers. The higher FRAG amounts (>1,900 bp) are detected in the CCPA. CCPA, Charybdis crab population A; CCPB, Charybdis crab population B; FRAGs, fragments; ONT-primers, oligonucleotides primers.

The BS value between individual’s no. 01 and no. 10 was the lowest (0.371) between the two CCPs and the value between individual’s no. 10 and no. 11 was the highest (0.818), as shown in Table 1. The five ONT-primers, OPA-16, OPB-10, OPB-15, OPD-10, and OPD-20 were spent to yield the number of ULSECP and number of LSTCP (Table 2). 305 FRAGs were identified in the CCPA, and 344 in the Charybdis crab population B (CCPB): 44 number of ULSECP (14.43%) in the CCPA and 110 (31.98%) in the CCPB. 44 number of LSTCP, with an average of 8.8 per primer, were detected in the two crab populations. The ONT-primer OPD-20 generated 44 identical DNA FRGMs, nearly 200 bp and 300 bp, in both the CCPA and CCPB. Assessed independently, the average molecular difference (MD) was higher in the CCPB than in the CCPA.

Table 1. SM, plus BS values, assessed the similarity of two CCPs from the Yellow Sea of the Korea.

BS values of CCPA BS values of CCPB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
1 0.473 0.464 0.609 0.555 0.658 0.486 0.489 0.485 0.371 0.514 0.380 0.425 0.448 0.493 0.422 0.437 0.368 0.428 0.371 0.370 0.374
2 0.703 0.572 0.612 0.543 0.598 0.476 0.620 0.689 0.623 0.474 0.505 0.476 0.474 0.439 0.482 0.539 0.585 0.585 0.424 0.485
3 0.522 0.649 0.642 0.780 0.375 0.685 0.700 0.676 0.554 0.528 0.625 0.423 0.486 0.496 0.511 0.597 0.459 0.499 0.405
4 0.702 0.588 0.539 0.444 0.554 0.516 0.624 0.443 0.493 0.419 0.444 0.451 0.442 0.425 0.597 0.455 0.444 0.384
5 0.748 0.694 0.472 0.643 0.513 0.545 0.495 0.467 0.437 0.452 0.446 0.463 0.513 0.404 0.365 0.341 0.448
6 0.387 0.544 0.578 0.421 0.421 0.408 0.449 0.492 0.458 0.493 0.544 0.449 0.376 0.456 0.495 0.457
7 0.433 0.700 0.543 0.596 0.425 0.523 0.435 0.441 0.533 0.476 0.493 0.500 0.446 0.417 0.506
8 0.463 0.612 0.584 0.292 0.585 0.324 0.382 0.289 0.360 0.317 0.357 0.389 0.336 0.324
9 0.643 0.743 0.514 0.547 0.527 0.936 0.564 0.526 0.450 0.514 0.484 0.477 0.490
10 0.818 0.357 0.415 0.414 0.476 0.345 0.384 0.375 0.518 0.516 0.346 0.470
11 0.457 0.451 0.462 0.494 0.443 0.430 0.407 0.489 0.521 0.379 0.459
12 0.862 0.797 0.658 0.689 0.658 0.686 0.608 0.644 0.609 0.675
13 0.804 0.745 0.697 0.753 0.816 0.714 0.682 0.621 0.663
14 0.753 0.810 0.703 0.755 0.657 0.670 0.604 0.651
15 0.712 0.768 0.741 0.706 0.668 0.605 0.601
16 0.851 0.821 0.694 0.648 0.613 0.617
17 0.886 0.751 0.782 0.781 0.659
18 0.591 0.694 0.732 0.691
19 0.867 0.567 0.836
20 0.673 0.692
21 0.558
22

SM, similarity matrix; BS values, bandsharing values; CCPs, Charybdis crab populations; CCPA, Charybdis crab population A; CCPB, Charybdis crab population B.

Table 2. The quantity of ULSECP and amount of LSTCP created by DNA scrutiny expending 5 ONT-primers in two CCPs from the Yellow Sea of Korea.

Component ONT-primer\Population No. of ULSECP No. of LSTCP
CCPA CCPB Two CCPs
OPA-16 11 11 0
OPB-10 11 22 0
OPB-15 0 0 0
OPD-10 0 11 0
OPD-20 22 77 44
Total no. 44 (305 FRAGs) 110 (344FRAGs) 44
Median no. per primer 8.8 22 8.8

ULSECP, unique loci shared to each crab population; LSTCP, loci shared by the two crab populations.

CCPs, Charybdis crab populations; ONT-primers, oligonucleotides primers; CCPA, Charybdis crab population A; CCPB, Charybdis crab population B; FRAGs, fragments.

The ONT-primer OPC-07 created 44 unique loci shared to each pufferfish population (ULSEPP) of the refined river pufferfish (Yoon, 2020). The author contended that the ONT-primer OPC-05 discovered 44 loci shared by all samples of the two river pufferfish populations, as thick and/or thin FRAGs of 500 bp and 1,200 bp, separately. Also, the author stated that five ONT-polymers were expended making a full of 110 LUECP in first group and 132 in second group in two Scapharca subcrenata populations, separately, shifting in amount of DNA FRAGs from larger than nearly 50 to below 1,050 bp (Yoon, 2021b). As prepared reference of clams, shrimps and oysters, for PCR scrutiny, Yoon & Kim (2003a) stated that 7 ONT-primers created 585 thick and thin DNA FRAGs from three terrestrial locations, making roughly 6.6 median yields per ONT-primer in marsh clams (Corbicula spp.) from Gochang. McCormack et al. (2000) contended that DNA FRAGs acquired by four ONT-primers ranged from 100 to 2,300 bp in the brittle star (Amphiura filiformis). It has been informed that 7 ONT-primers produced 317 FRAGs in a farmed shrimp population, and 385 in the untamed population, extending from 100 to 1,800 bp (Yoon & Kim, 2003b).

The average bandsharing values (ABS values) was 0.457±0.007 between the CCPA and CCPB, as established in Table 3. The ABS values of individuals in the CCPA (0.575±0.014) were lesser than in those originated from the CCPB (0.705±0.011) (p < 0.05). To elucidate, reports have exposed that the median BS value attained expending five ONT-primers was 0.852 in the rainbow trout population, 0.704 in the masu salmon population (Yoon, 2020), and 0.282±0.008 between the two terrestrial oyster populations (Kim et al., 2004).

Table 3. Multiple calculations of ABS values (mean±SE) between populations of two Charybdis crab populations from the Yellow Sea were created in company with the BS values and SM.

Population CCPA CCPB
CCPA 0.575±0.014 b 0.457±0.007 c
CCPB 0.705±0.011 a

Each assessment is an outcome of three unlike tests.

a–c

Rates with altered superscript are significantly altered, p<0.05.

ABS values, average bandsharing values; BS values, bandsharing values; SM, similarity matrix; CCPA, Charybdis crab population A; CCPB, Charybdis crab population B.

The PHD achieved by the five ONT-primers denotes three genetic clusters (GCs): cluster I (CHARYBCRAB 01, 04, 05, 06, and 08), cluster II (CHARYBCRAB 02, 03, 07, 09, 10, and 11) and cluster III (CHARYBCRAB 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22), as shown in Fig. 2. The shortest GD displaying significant MD was between individuals CHARYBCRAB no. 18 and CHARYBCRAB no. 17 (0.055). The longest GD showing significant MDs between two Charybdis crab populations was observed in individuals CHARYBCRAB no. 06 and CHARYBCRAB no. 01 (0.632). In due course, individual no. 01 of the CCPA was most distantly related to CCPA no. 06 (GD=0.632).

Fig. 2. PHD of GD acquired from two populations of Charybdis crab.

Fig. 2.

The affinity between altered individuals in the two Charybdis crab populations from cluster I (CHARYBCRAB 01, 04, 05, 06, and 08), cluster II (CHARYBCRAB 02, 03, 07, 09, 10, and 11) and cluster III (CHARYBCRAB 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22) was created as stated by the BS rates and SM. PHD, polar hierarchical dendrogram; GDs, genetic distances; BS values, bandsharing values; SM, similarity matrix.

In finfish, this grouping scrutiny acquired a form consistent with the one postulated by Nagarajan et al. (2006). Amid the three Channa punctatus collections gathered from a few waterways of south India, the maximum hereditary space (GD=0.9231) was acquired between two sample collections (Nagarajan et al., 2006). This analysis presented that great MDs could be achieved among individuals of terrestrial sample assembles. The rates of the pairwise appraisals of balanced GD between the populations of the tailfin anchovy (Coilia nasus) from the pooled records for the seven ONT-primers, ranged from 0.051 to 0.435 (Jo & Yoon, 2021). The GD between individuals thus confirmed the reality of a neighboring affiliation in group II between two populations of tailfin anchovy. As mentioned formerly, the promise of genomic PCR to ascertain analytical markers for the recognition of the two CCPs has been validated. S. subcrenata bi-group can be obviously categorized by gDNA-grounded processes.

Numerous investigators scrutinized the measures of DNA FRAGs in the genomic products of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) (Diaz-Jaimes & Uribe-Alcocer, 2003), Amazonian fish matrincha (Brycon cephalus) (Wasko et al., 2004), Chryseobacterium strains (Bernardet et al., 2005), spotted murrel (C. punctatus) (Nagarajan et al., 2006), crayfish (Cambaroides similis) (Kim et al., 2004), yellow grouper (Epinephelus awoara) (Upadhyay et al., 2006), Aeromonas spp. (Ghatak et al., 2007), rockfish (Sebastes spp.) (Yoon et al., 2007), gracilaria (Gracilaria vermiculophylla) (Yoon, 2018), river pufferfish (Takifugu obscurus) (Yoon, 2020), and tailfin anchovy (C. nasus) (Jo & Yoon, 2021). The apparent primer revealed significant MDs in parties and groups, resulting from variations in DNA polymorphisms among parties and groups (Archak et al., 2003; Diaz-Jaimes & Uribe-Alcocer, 2003; Wang & Li, 2004; Wasko et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006; Nagarajan et al., 2006; Yoon, 2018; Yoon, 2020; Jo & Yoon, 2021).

Above-mentioned cluster analysis exposed an association between the individuals within two crustacean assemblies relatively declaring added invertebrates (Yoon, 2018). In the other clams, cluster analysis of the pairwise group matrix, produced from inherited identifications, designated that geographically close clusters be arranged to collect jointly in the blacklip abalone (Huang et al., 2000). The ability of ONT-polymers enlarged DNAs to disclose distinctive markers for breed, stock, species, genus, and assembly evidence of personality in life individuals (Esselman et al., 2000; Huang et al., 2000; Dixon et al., 2004; García et al., 2004; Araneda et al., 2005; Gelin & Souty-Grosset, 2006; Godhe et al., 2006; Upadhyay et al., 2006; Ghatak et al., 2007; Yoon et al., 2007; Kang & Yoon, 2013; Kim & Yoon, 2018; Yoon, 2021b) has also been fine accepted.

Great point of an important GD between two S. subcrenata groups showed this research process is one of the most appropriate apparatuses for biotechnological DNA studies on entities and units of other life beings (Koh et al., 1998; Dixon et al., 2004; Araneda et al., 2005; Godhe et al., 2006; Kang & Yoon, 2013; Yoon, 2018). It has been described that the ONT-primer was valuable in the documentation of entities and/or groups, resulting from variations in DNA polymorphisms among entities/populations (Archak et al., 2003; Diaz-Jaimes & Uribe-Alcocer, 2003; Yoon & Kim, 2003a; Wang & Li, 2004; Wasko et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006; Nagarajan et al., 2006; Upadhyay et al., 2006; Ghatak et al., 2007; Yoon et al., 2007; Kang & Yoon, 2013; Yoon, 2020; Jo & Yoon, 2021; Yoon, 2021a).

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to acknowledge the financial support of the Fisheries Science Institute of Kunsan National University made in the program year of 2022.

ORCID

Conflict of interests

The author declares no potential conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

The article is prepared by a single author.

Ethics approval

This article does not require IRB/IACUC approval because there are no human and animal participants.

REFERENCES

  1. Araneda C, Neira R, Iturra P. Identification of a dominant SCAR marker associated with colour traits in coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) Aquaculture. 2005;247:67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.02.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Archak S, Gaikwad AB, Gautam D, Rao EVVB, Swamy KRM, Karihaloo JL. Comparative assessment of DNA fingerprinting techniques (RAPD, ISSR and AFLP) for genetic analysis of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) accessions of India. Genome. 2003;46:362–369. doi: 10.1139/g03-016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernardet JF, Vancanneyt M, Matte-Tailliez O, Grisez L, Tailliez P, Bizet C, Nowakowski M, Kerouault B, Swings J. Polyphasic study of Chryseobacterium strains isolated from diseased aquatic animals. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2005;28:640–660. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2005.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Diaz-Jaimes P, Uribe-Alcocer M. Allozyme and RAPD variation in the eastern Pacific yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) Fish Bull. 2003;101:769–777. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dixon BA, Shinn AP, Sommerville C. Genetic characterization of populations of the ectoparasitic caligid, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Krøyer 1837) using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Aquac Res. 2004;35:730–741. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2004.01095.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Esselman EJ, Crawford DJ, Brauner S, Stuessy TF, Anderson GJ, Silva OM. RAPD marker diversity within and divergence among species of Dendroseris (Asteraceae: Lactuceae) Am J Bot. 2000;87:591–596. doi: 10.2307/2656603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. García G, Claramunt S, Lalanne AI. Genetic differentiation among annual fishes of the genus Cynolebias (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivuluidae) in a biosphere reserve site from Uruguay. Environ Biol Fishes. 2004;70:247–256. doi: 10.1023/B:EBFI.0000033339.55585.f6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghatak S, Agarwal RK, Bhilegaonkar KN. Species identification of clinically important Aeromonas spp. by restriction fragment length polymorphism of 16S rDNA. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2007;44:550–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gelin A, Souty-Grosset C. Species identification and ecological study of the genus Palaemonetes (Decapoda: Caridea) in the French Mediterranean. J Crustac Biol. 2006;26:124–133. doi: 10.1651/C-2487.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Godhe A, McQuoid MR, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I, Rehnstam-Holm AS. Comparison of three common molecular tools for distinguishing among geographically separated clones of the diatom Skeletonema marinoi Sarno et Zingone (Bacillariophyceae) J Phycol. 2006;42:280–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00197.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ho CT. Flavor constituents in enzyme hydrolysates from shore swimming crab and spotted shrimp. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2001;30:787–795. [Google Scholar]
  12. Heo YS, Lee BK, Huh MK. Morphological variability of the Japanese swimming Charybdis japonica populations. J Life Sci. 2006;16:672–675. doi: 10.5352/JLS.2006.16.4.672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Huang BX, Peakall R, Hanna PJ. Analysis of genetic structure of blacklip abalone (Haliotis rubra) populations using RAPD minisatellite and microsatellite markers. Mar Biol. 2000;136:207–216. doi: 10.1007/s002270050678. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jo SG, Yoon JM. Genetic distances between tailfin anchovy (Coilia nasus) populations analyzed by PCR. Dev Reprod. 2021;25:59–65. doi: 10.12717/DR.2021.25.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim S, Kim YH, Yoon JM. Genetic variation in geographic crayfish (Cambaroides similis) populations. J Fish Pathol. 2006;19:141–153. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kang SK, Yoon JM. Geographic variations of three Fulvia mutica populations. Korean J Malacol. 2013;29:163–169. doi: 10.9710/kjm.2013.29.3.163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim DA, Ko KS. Fishing mechanism of pots and their modification. Bull Korean Fish Soc. 1987;20:348–354. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kim JY, Park CY, Yoon JM. Genetic differences and DNA polymorphism in oyster (Crassostrea spp.) analyzed by RAPD-PCR. Korean J Genet. 2004;26:123–134. [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim YS, Yoon JM. Genetic distances in two Gracilaria species (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) identified by PCR technique. Dev Reprod. 2018;22:393–402. doi: 10.12717/DR.2018.22.4.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Koh MC, Lim CH, Chua SB, Chew ST, Phang STW. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprints for identification of red meat animal species. Meat Sci. 1998;48:275–285. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00104-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. McCormack GP, Powell R, Keegan BF. Comparative analysis of two populations of the brittle star Amphiura f iliformis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidea) with different life history strategies using RAPD markers. Mar Biotechnol. 2000;2:100–106. doi: 10.1007/s101269900013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nagarajan M, Haniffa MA, Gopalakrishnan A, Basheer VS, Muneer A. Genetic variability of Channa punctatus populations using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Aquac Res. 2006;37:1151–1155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01539.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Oh KS. The character impact compounds of odor evolved from cooked shore swimming crab flesh. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2002;35:122–129. doi: 10.5657/kfas.2002.35.2.122. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Park IW, Kim HS, Choe KH, Choe SN, Kim JB, Lim SH. Food composition of crab (Charybdis japonica) preserved in brine. J Fish Mar Sci Edu. 2008;20:95–106. [Google Scholar]
  25. Seo IS, Hong JS. Food habits of the Asian paddle crab, Charybdis japonica (A. Milne-Edwards) on the Jangbong tidal flat, Incheon, Korea. Korean J Environ Biol. 2009;27:297–305. [Google Scholar]
  26. Upadhyay SK, Jun W, Yong-Quan S, Shao-Xiong D, Chaturvedi S. Genetic diversity of yellow grouper (Epinephelus awoara) determined by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Fish Bull. 2006;104:638–642. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang CH, Li SF. Phylogenetic relationships of ornamental (koi) carp, Oujiang color carp and long-fin carp revealed by mitochondrial DNA COII gene sequences and RAPD analysis. Aquaculture. 2004;231:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2003.10.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wasko AP, Martins C, Oliveira C, Senhorini JA, Foresti F. Genetic monitoring of the Amazonian fish matrinchã (Brycon cephalus) using RAPD markers: Insights into supportive breeding and conservation programmes. J Appl Ichthyol. 2004;20:48–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2004.00479.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Yeon IJ, Lee YS, Song MY, Park WG. Seasonal timing and distribution of Charybdis japonica (Decapoda: Portunidae) larvae off Yeonpyeong-do in the Yellow Sea, Korea. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci. 2011;44:162–166. doi: 10.5657/kfas.2011.44.2.162. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yoon JM, Kim YH. Wide marsh clam (Corbicula spp.) populations from three sites analysed by RAPD-PCR-AGE. Bull Electrochem. 2003a;19:337–348. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoon JM, Kim GW. Genetic differences between cultured and wild penaeid shrimp (Penaeus chinensis) populations analysed by RAPD-PCR. Korean J Genet. 2003b;25:21–32. [Google Scholar]
  32. Yoon JM, Choi Y, Kim JY. Genetic differences and variation in black rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli) and Hwanghae rockfish (S. koreanus) from the Yellow Sea. Korean J Genet. 2007;29:437–445. [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoon JM. Genetic variations of intra- and between-razor clam Solen corneus population identified by PCR analysis. Dev Reprod. 2018;22:193–198. doi: 10.12717/DR.2018.22.2.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yoon JM. Genetic differences in natural and cultured river pufferfish populations by PCR analysis. Dev Reprod. 2020;24:327–336. doi: 10.12717/DR.2020.24.4.327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yoon JM. Analysis of geographical genetic differences of arkshell populations in Korea. Dev Reprod. 2021a;25:105–111. doi: 10.12717/DR.2021.25.2.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Yoon JM. Genetic distances for intra- and between-group of Scapharca subcrenata from Yeosu of the Korea. Dev Reprod. 2021b;25:305–311. doi: 10.12717/DR.2021.25.4.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Development & Reproduction are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Developmental Biology

RESOURCES