Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2022 Jun 20;209(3):465–475. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200208

Tolerogenic Immune Modifying Nanoparticles Encapsulating Multiple Recombinant Pancreatic β Cell Proteins Prevent Onset and Progression of Type 1 Diabetes in NOD Mice

Joseph R Podojil *,§, Samantha Genardi §, Ming-Yi Chiang *, Sandeep Kakade §, Tobias Neef *, Tushar Murthy §, Michael T Boyne II *,§, Adam Elhofy §, Stephen D Miller *,#,1
PMCID: PMC9339508  NIHMSID: NIHMS1811050  PMID: 35725270

Abstract

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by T and B cell responses to proteins expressed by insulin-producing pancreatic β cells, inflammatory lesions within islets (insulitis), and β cell loss. We previously showed that antigen (Ag)-specific tolerance targeting single β cell protein epitopes is effective in preventing T1D induced by transfer of mono-specific diabetogenic CD4 and CD8 transgenic T cells to NOD.scid mice. However, tolerance induction to individual diabetogenic proteins, e.g., GAD65 or insulin, has failed to ameliorate T1D both in wildtype NOD mice and in the clinic. Initiation and progression of T1D is likely due to activation of T cells specific for multiple diabetogenic epitopes. To test this hypothesis, recombinant insulin, GAD65, and chromogranin A proteins were encapsulated within poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles (COUR CNPs) to assess regulatory T cell induction, inhibition of Ag-specific T cell responses, and blockade of T1D induction/progression in NOD mice. While treatment of NOD mice with CNPs containing a single protein inhibited the corresponding Ag-specific T cell response, inhibition of overt T1D development only occurred if all three diabetogenic proteins were included within the CNPs (CNP-T1D). Blockade of T1D following CNP-T1D tolerization was characterized by regulatory T cell induction and a significant decrease in both peri-insulitis and immune cell infiltration into pancreatic islets. As we have recently published that CNP treatment is both safe and induced Ag-specific tolerance in a Phase 1/2a celiac disease clinical trial, Ag-specific tolerance induced by nanoparticles encapsulating multiple diabetogenic proteins is a promising approach to T1D treatment.

Keywords: immune tolerance, type 1 diabetes, PLGA nanoparticles, regulatory T cells, cell trafficking

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease affecting around 1.6 million people in the US and 4.7 million people world-wide (1, 2). Presently, the standard of care for patients with T1D is exogenous insulin replacement combined with diet and exercise modifications (3). Evidence from both the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse model of spontaneous T1D and T1D patients suggests that insulin is only one of several dominant measurable disease-associated Ags recognized by autoreactive CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells driving disease pathogenesis (4, 5). The disease initiating epitope or epitopes in T1D are not known, and therefore not surprisingly, single protein or peptide tolerance approaches have been unsuccessful to date in both NOD mice and human T1D patients. T1D is not a single antigen (Ag)-mediated disease, rather once inflammation within the pancreas and tissue destruction occurs the autoimmune response expands to include both T cell and B cell responses to additional epitopes, a process known as epitope spreading (69). In support of a role for epitope spreading in T1D, autoreactive responses to Ags other than insulin, including glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65), islet specific glucose 6 phosphate catalytic subunit related protein (IGRP), Islet antigen-2 (IA-2), phogrin (IA-2β), Chromogranin A, zinc transporter 8 (ZnT8), and vasostain-1 (5, 1012), have been identified in both T1D patients and NOD mice. Therefore, the failure of tolerance approaches targeting single Ags, such as GAD65 or insulin, to inhibit the onset and eventual progression of disease in clinical trials suggests that tolerance to multiple disease Ags may be necessary to provide efficient disease control (6, 8, 9).

Currently, there are no available therapies that treat the root cause of T1D, i.e., activated autoimmune T cells mediating continued pancreatic β cell destruction, either through CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cell-mediated inflammation, or autoantibodies. Therapies in the pipeline are alternatively targeting broad T cell suppression with anti-CD3 or transient suppression with single Ag-specific CAR-Tregs. Our laboratory has studied the ability to induce Ag-specific tolerance via the induction of Ag-specific Treg cells and the induction of IL-10, CTLA-4, and PD-1 expression following treatment with Ag-coupled apoptotic splenocytes, Ag-coupled nanoparticles, and nanoparticles that contain encapsulated Ag [reviewed (13, 14)]. We have shown that intravenous treatment with carboxylated poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles induces Ag-specific immune tolerance in a wide variety of mouse disease models via CD4+ regulatory T cell (Treg)-dependent mechanisms (3, 1517). Biodegradable carboxylated PLGA nanoparticles containing encapsulated Ag [tolerance-inducing microparticles (TIMPs); named CNPs] were shown to prevent and treat disease in several mouse models of T1D through reprogramming of APCs and induction of Treg cells. Nanoparticle size (400–800 nm) and negative charge results in phagocytic uptake of the Ag-encapsulating nanoparticles by tolerogenic APCs via the MARCO scavenger receptor in the splenic marginal zone and liver, resulting in presentation of the Ag in the context of immune regulatory signals including PD-L1/2 and IL-10 (14). For example, the treatment with PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating or coated with the chromogranin A mimotope peptide, p31, following the transfer of diabetogenic transgenic CD4+ BDC-2.5 T cells to NOD.scid mice, led to the sequestration of the autoreactive effector CD4+ T cells within the spleen and increased CD4+FoxP3+ Treg cells in the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes and pancreas (16). The induction of the Treg cells was found to be required for long-term tolerance as the removal of CD25+ T cells drastically reduced the time through which tolerance was maintained. Additionally, in the BDC-2.5 CD4+ T cell adoptive transfer model, PLGA nanoparticles coupled with a hybrid insulin peptide, 2.5HIP, also increased the numbers of FoxP3+ Treg cells in the pancreas and reduced the trafficking of effector CD4+ T cells (18). These findings suggest that a common regulatory mechanism is induced at the cellular level across mouse strains, in that Ag-loaded PLGA nanoparticle treatment induced various subsets of Ag-specific Treg cells capable of regulating autoimmune disease.

With regards to clinical translation, CNP nanoparticles have demonstrated efficacy to induce tolerance in mouse models of EAE, T1D (adoptive transfer), celiac disease, and Th2-induced allergic airway inflammation (16, 17, 19). In these models, CNP treatment reduced pathogenic cytokine production (IFN-γ, IL-17, IL-4, and IL-5) (16, 17, 19), increasing anti-inflammatory IL-10 cytokine production (16), and increasing CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells at the site of disease (16). In pre-clinical studies to assess CNP function in celiac disease, treatment with gliadin encapsulating PLGA nanoparticles (TIMP-GLIA, TAK-101/CNP-101) significantly decreased gliadin-specific T cell proliferation, inflammatory cytokine secretion, circulating gliadin-specific IgG/IgG2c, gliadin-specific DTH response, gluten-dependent enteropathy, and weight loss (17). The functionality of TAK-101/TIMP-GLIA treatment was also demonstrated in HLA-DQ8 transgenic mice, as treatment increased the level of FoxP3 expression, and induced gene signatures associated with tolerance induction (17). The CNP nanoparticle design was first introduced into human clinical studies with TAK-101/TIMP-GLIA and demonstrated successful induction of tolerance in celiac patients orally challenged with gluten (20). These studies assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of TAK-101/TIMP-GLIA treatment to induce gliadin-specific T cell tolerance in patients with biopsy-confirmed celiac disease (20).

In the present study we sought to address both a fundamental immunological question regarding identification of disease-dependent Ag-specific T cell responses involved in the onset of T1D in NOD mice and to determine if treatment of NOD mice with CNPs containing recombinant diabetogenic proteins would inhibit the development of T1D. The spontaneous NOD mouse model recapitulates some key disease characteristics of human T1D, where multiple diabetogenic Ags drive disease progression. Insulin, GAD65, and chromogranin A proteins known to be potential targets in TID were encapsulated within TIMPs (CNP-T1D), enabling us to test the simultaneous tolerogenic targeting of multiple diabetogenic CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell epitopes for efficacy in preventing T1D onset (21). Treatment with CNP-T1D beginning at either 6 or 10 weeks of age prevented β cell destruction and further epitope spreading, as well as inhibiting the secretion of IFN-γ upon splenocyte ex vivo recall culture. Encapsulation of multiple disease epitopes in CNP-T1D covering three major T1D autoantigens was necessary to prevent T1D onset as single protein tolerance proved insufficient. CNP-T1D-induced tolerance was durable lasting for 13.5 weeks post third dose administration. Taken together, these data show CNP-T1D is a promising therapeutic for treatment of T1D and provides an advantage over single protein or single epitope targeting therapies by inducing tolerance to multiple encapsulated cognate epitopes as well as spread epitopes.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Acid-terminated Poly(D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) polymer was purchased from Lactel Absorbable Polymers (Evonik Corporation, AL). Recombinant Insulin was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (St., Louis, MO). Recombinant GAD65 and Chromogranin proteins were custom ordered from Biomatik, Inc. (Ontario, Canada). MOG92–106, p31, Pro-ins C19-A3, and the linkered peptide p31-NRPA7-InsB9–23 were purchased from Genemed Synthesis (Torrance, CA). 2.5-HIP was generously provided by the Kathryn Haskins laboratory at the University of Colorado. See Supp. Table 1 for peptide sequences.

Manufacture of CNP nanoparticles (PLGA nanoparticles)

For CNPs encapsulating diabetic proteins (Insulin, Chromogranin A, or GAD65), PLGA solution was mixed with each recombinant protein to generate a water-in-oil emulsion. This was mixed with a proprietary blend of surfactants and organic solvents to form an oil-in-water secondary emulsion. The solvent was removed by evaporation, yielding PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating diabetic protein, which were washed, filtered, and concentrated via tangential flow filtration. CNP-Insulin, CNP-Chromogranin A, and CNP-GAD65 were supplied as a lyophilized powder containing approximately 100 mg of PLGA nanoparticles per vial with average nanoparticle diameters 400–800 nm and zeta potentials of -30 to −60 mV. The protein content was ≥ 3 μg of recombinant protein per milligram of PLGA (Supp. Figure 1). Nanoparticles used in initial attempts to inhibit T1D were created by slightly different methods. PLGA(Insulin) was created by double-emulsion, solvent evaporation as described previously (22). PLGA/MOG92–106, PLGA/Insulin, PLGA/Pro-insC19-A3, PLGA/p31-NRPA7-InsB9–23 were synthesized by first coupling peptide to PLGA polymer in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) using ethylene carbodiimide (ECDI), followed by single emulsion, solvent evaporation as previously described (23).

NOD mice, blood glucose monitoring, and treatment

Female NOD mice, 5 weeks of age, were purchased from Jackson Labs (Bar Harbor, ME). All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Northwestern University Center for Comparative Medicine and maintained according to protocols approved by the Northwestern University Animal Care and Use Committee (Chicago, IL). NOD mice were treated with CNPs (2.5 mg/dose in 200 μL sterile saline) on the specified days. Blood glucose levels were measured in female NOD mice with UltraTRAK Pro Blood Glucose Monitoring System weekly starting at the 6 weeks of age. Mice with two consecutive readings at or above 250 mg/dL were determined to be diabetic.

Ex vivo recalls

On indicated days mice were euthanized and spleens were collected for isolation of single cell suspensions. For ex vivo reactivation cultures, 1×106 total splenocytes were plated in replicate wells on a 96-well flat-bottomed plates with complete RPMI medium plus anti-CD3 (1 μg/mL), OVA323–339, Chromogranin A359–372, Insulin B9–23, Insulin A14–20, GAD65286–300, GAD65515–524, IGRP206–214, HSP60437–460, or Znt8345–359 (20 μg/mL) (Supp. Table 2). The culture supernatants were collected at 72 hours post culture and levels of secreted cytokines were determined via Luminex using a Mouse Cytokine/Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel (Millipore).

Pathology Scoring of Pancreata

For histological analysis, the pancreas was removed and snap frozen in OCT. Multiple 10 μm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and scored blindly for insulitis (Score: no infiltrate; peri-insulitis present; <25%; and >25% of the islet is infiltrated). Average insulitis percentages were determined from the total number of islets counted from each treatment group.

Tissue processing and flow cytometry

The spleens and pancreatic lymph nodes were processed via physical disruption, and RBCs were lysed using ammonium chloride prior to processing for flow cytometry. For the pancreas, single cell suspensions were prepared by mincing the tumor tissue in 2 mL of Accutase (MilliPore) plus 1 mg/mL collagenase, and the samples were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Following the enzyme digestion, the pancreas samples were disrupted with a 100 μm cell strainer, the cell strainer washed 2x with 10 mL of HBSS+ 5% FCS, and the cells pelleted. Cells were washed in PBS, stained with LIVE/DEAD® Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain (Life Technologies; Grand Island, NY), blocked with anti-CD16/32 (ThermoFisher Scientific), and then stained with the indicated antibodies. 106 viable cells were analyzed per individual sample using a BD Celesta (BD Bioscience), and the data analyzed using FloJo Version 9.5.2 software (Tree Star, Inc.; Ashland, OR). The specific antibodies used are presented in Supp. Table 3.

Statistical analyses

Comparisons of T1D incidence were analyzed by X2 using Fisher’s exact probability. Two-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni post-test was used to determine statistical differences between treatment groups.

Results

Multiple diabetogenic peptide-specific T cell populations are present within the spleen of NOD mice

Identification of the specific disease-inducing protein/peptide in spontaneous type 1 diabetes (T1D) in NOD mice and human patients has been a topic of study for many years. While the induction of tolerance to a single peptide is very reproducible after intravenous infusion of peptide encapsulating PLGA nanoparticles (tolerance-inducing microparticles/TIMP; named CNP), the specific disease-associated T cell epitopes need to be known for this tolerance therapy to be effective. We previously showed that treatment of NOD.scid mice PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating with the BDC2.5 mimetope 1040-31 (p31), the NY8.3 mimetope NRPA7, and the linked p31-NRPA7-Insulin B9–23 peptide significantly inhibit T1D-induced by the transfer of transgenic CD4+ BDC2.5 or CD8+ NY8.3 T cells, respectively (16). However, individual treatment of wildtype NOD mice with PLGA nanoparticles containing p31, p31-NRPA7-Insulin B9–23, pro-insulin C19-A3 or intact insulin (Figure 1A) failed to inhibit development of T1D. Similarly, while treatment of NOD.scid mice alone with PLGA-2.5HIP inhibits CD4+ BDC2.5 transgenic T cell-induced T1D (18), this treatment is not able to delay the onset of T1D in NOD mice (Figure 1B). Thus, targeting of individual diabetogenic peptide epitopes is incapable of inhibiting onset of T1D supporting the hypothesis that tolerogenic targeting of multiple CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell epitopes using a combination of several recombinant diabetogenic proteins may be required.

Figure 1: Various diabetogenic peptides induce IFN-γ secretion by splenocytes from NOD mice.

Figure 1:

(A) Female NOD mice (n=12) were treated with the indicated PLGA particles (2.5 mg/dose) at 5, 7, 9, and 11 weeks of age. (B) Female NOD mice (n=20) were treated with the indicated PLGA particles (2.5 mg/dose) at 10, 12, and 14 weeks of age. For A and B, blood glucose levels were monitored weekly, and mice were scored as diabetic after two consecutive blood glucose reading >250 mg/dL. The data are presented as the percentage of mice that were normoglycemic over time. (C) Splenocytes (1×106 cells/well) from 6 week-old NOD, 9 week-old NOD, and 6 week-old C57BL/6 mice (n=3) were cultured in the presence of anti-CD3 (1 μg/mL), OVA323–339, or the indicated diabetogenic peptides (20 μg/mL). Culture supernatants were collected at 72 hours, and the level of secreted IFN-γ measured. The data are presented as the mean pg/mL of IFN-γ +/− S.E.M. secreted within the respective cultures. The calculated p-values are listed above the experimental group comparisons. Data are representative of one experiment of two individual experiments.

Based on previously published data and the above results, we asked if detectible T cell responses to multiple diabetogenic peptides were present within the spleen of 6 and 9 week-old NOD mice. These two time points were chosen as this represents ages where the number of immune cells within the pancreatic islets increases (24), there is detectible circulating anti-insulin antibody (Ab) (25), and there is a detectible splenic T cell response to various insulin peptides (26, 27). Splenocytes from 6 and 9 week-old NOD mice and 6 week-old C57BL/6 mice were cultured in the presence of 20 μg/mL of the following peptides: OVA323–339, chromogranin A359–372, insulin B9–23, insulin A14–29, GAD65286–300, GAD65515–524, IGRP206–214, HSP60437–460, or ZnT8345–359 (20). At 72 hours of culture, supernatants were collected, and the levels of secreted IFN-γ measured. We found that splenocytes from 6 week-old NOD, but not C57BL/6, mice, produced low, but significant, levels of IFN-γ in response to all of the diabetogenic peptides, but not to the control OVA323–339 peptide (Figure 1C). Additionally, there is a trend toward an age-dependent increase in the level of IFN-γ secreted by splenocytes cultured in the presence of each of the diabetogenic peptides, with the interesting exception of GAD65515–524. These findings indicate that T cells of various specificities are present and activated within young NOD mice, as early as 6 weeks of age, well prior to the onset of overt T1D.

CNP-T1D treatment inhibits the development of T1D in NOD mice

Based on the above data, we tested if the induction of tolerance to multiple diabetogenic proteins would block the onset of T1D. NOD mice were randomized into two treatment groups and treated with either 2.5 mg/dose of Unloaded CNP or CNPs containing recombinant insulin, GAD65, and chromogranin A proteins. A 2.5 mg dose of CNP-T1D consisted of 0.83 mg of CNP-Insulin, 0.83 mg of CNP-GAD65, 0.83 mg of CNP-Chromogranin A equaling a total 2.5 mg/dose. We hypothesized that CNP-T1D treatment would induce tolerance to chromogranin A359–372, insulin B9–23, insulin A14–29, GAD65286–300, and GAD65515–524, and thereby allow for an enhanced regulatory response within both the spleen and the pancreas. At 6 weeks of age NOD mice have anti-insulin antibodies (26) which is associated with T1D progression and is similar to the Ab profile for pre-diabetic stage 2 T1D patients (27). Studies in NOD mice (28) and humans (29, 30) suggest that 40–85% of the β cell mass has been destroyed by onset of diabetes (stage 3 in humans). Therefore, tolerogenic therapies administered prior to complete destruction of the β cell mass may serve the greatest benefit for patients. Mice were treated with 2.5 mg/dose of Unloaded CNP or CNP-T1D at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age to replicate stage 2 disease in T1D patients, and the level of blood glucose measured bi-weekly. Mice were considered to have overt diabetes after two consecutive blood glucose readings of >250 mg/dL. As shown in Figure 2A, treatment with CNP-T1D significantly decreased the number of NOD mice that developed T1D (1/10) versus CNP alone (9/10) and the effect was durable for at least 13.5 weeks post the third dose. CNP-T1D treatment significantly decreased the percentage of pancreatic islets that contained >25% immune cells (Figure 2B and C). Approximately 50% of the islets within the pancreas of CNP-T1D treated NOD mice had no detectible infiltrating immune cells. Additionally, the greatest efficacy of CNP-T1D required 2 or 3 doses (Figure 2D).

Figure 2: CNP-T1D prevents onset and progression of spontaneous T1D and immune cell infiltration into the pancreatic islets of NOD mice.

Figure 2:

(A and E) Female NOD mice (n=10) were treated with either Unloaded CNP or CNP-T1D (2.5 mg/dose) at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age (A) or at 10, 11, and 15 weeks of age (E). Blood glucose levels were monitored bi-weekly, and mice were scored as diabetic after two consecutive blood glucose reading >250 mg/dL. The data are presented as the percentage of mice that were normoglycemic over time. (B, C, and F) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining of pancreata from Unloaded CNP and CNP-T1D treated mice were scored for the level of immune cell infiltrate in pancreatic islets (B). The data are presented as the percentage of islets that contained no immune cells, immune cells around the edge of the islet (peri-insulitis), or the percentage of the islet that contained immune cell infiltration (% infiltration) +/− S.E.M. (C, and F). (D) Female NOD mice (n=10) were treated at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age with either Unloaded CNP (3 total doses), 1 dose CNP-T1D plus 2 doses of Unloaded CNP, 2 doses of CNP-T1D plus 1 dose of Unloaded CNP, or 3 doses of CNP-T1D (2.5 mg/dose) at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age. Blood glucose levels were monitored bi-weekly, and mice were scored as diabetic after two consecutive blood glucose reading >250 mg/dL. The data are presented as the percentage of mice that were normoglycemic over time. Asterisks (*, **, ***, ****) indicate a statistically significant difference as compared to Unloaded CNP treated mice, p < 0.05, < 0.01, < 0.001, and < 0.0001 respectively. Data are representative of one experiment of two individual experiments.

To better simulate treatment closer to onset of dysglycemia, we next tested CNP-T1D treatment of NOD mice at 10, 11, and 15 weeks of age. Similar to mice treated at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age, this delayed treatment regimen significantly decreased the incidence of mice developing T1D (Figure 2E) as well as the percentage of pancreatic islets that contained >25% immune cells (Figure 2F) and the effect was durable for at least 7 weeks post third dose administration. Collectively these results show that tolerogenic treatment with CNP-T1D containing multiple diabetogenic CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell epitopes starting at either 6 weeks of age to mimic Stage 2 T1D (prior to onset of clinical symptoms) or at 10 weeks of age to mimic late Stage 2/early Stage 3 T1D (prior to overt diabetes but after dysglycemia) significantly prevented T1D development which developed in >90% of control mice starting at 13 weeks of age.

Durable tolerance requires all 3 diabetogenic proteins in CNP-T1D and decreases IFN-γ and increases IL-10 secretion

As further confirmation for the requirement of all three diabetogenic proteins to be contained within the CNP-T1D dose, we compared tolerance with the individual recombinant proteins to CNP-T1D. NOD mice were treated with Unloaded CNP (2.5 mg/dose), CNP-Insulin (0.83 mg/dose + 1.67 mg/dose of Unloaded CNP), CNP-Chromogranin A (0.83 mg/dose + 1.67 mg/dose of Unloaded CNP), CNP-GAD65 (0.83 mg/dose + 1.67 mg/dose of Unloaded CNP), or CNP-T1D (2.5 mg/dose) at 6, 7 and 11 weeks of age. As such, all mice received the same dose of 2.5 mg CNPs, and the amount of each respective recombinant diabetogenic protein within this dose was constant across respective treatment groups. Strikingly, the results show that only treatment of NOD mice with CNP-T1D containing the three diabetogenic proteins significantly inhibited the onset of T1D as compared to nanoparticles encapsulating any one of the individual recombinant proteins (Figure 3A). In the present experiment, NOD mice treated with CNP-Insulin and CNP-Chromogranin A exhibited a significant increase in disease incidence as compared to the unloaded CNP treatment group (Figure 3A). However, this finding varied from experiment to experiment, as PLG(Insulin) and PLG/PLG did not increase in disease incidence as presented in Figure 1A.

Figure 3: Effective tolerogenic treatment of spontaneous T1D in NOD mice requires targeting of multiple β cell autoantigens and induces an Ag-specific decrease in the level of IFN-γ and increase in the level of IL-10 secreted by NOD splenocytes.

Figure 3:

(A) Female NOD mice (n=10) were treated with either Unloaded CNP, CNP-Insulin, CNP-GAD65, CNP-Chromogranin A, or CNP-T1D (2.5 mg/dose) at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age. Blood glucose levels were monitored bi-weekly, and mice were scored as diabetic after two consecutive blood glucose reading >250 mg/dL. The data are presented as the percentage of mice that were normoglycemic over time. (B) At 9 weeks of age spleens were collected from a cohort of treated mice, and splenocytes (1×106 cells/well) were cultured in the presence of the indicated peptides (20 μg/mL). The data are presented as the ratio of IFN-γ (pg/mL) to IL-10 secreted (pg/mL) (C-J) The specific values for the level of IFN-γ and IL-10 are presented for the respective peptide stimuli. Culture supernatants were collected at 72 hours, and the level of secreted IFN-γ and IL-10 measured. The data are presented as the mean pg/mL of IFN-γ and IL-10 ± S.E.M. secreted within the respective cultures. Asterisks (*, **, ***, ****) indicate a statistically significant difference as compared to Unloaded CNP treated mice, p < 0.05, < 0.01, < 0.001, and < 0.0001 respectively. Data are representative of one experiment of two individual experiments.

To confirm the specificity of the various tolerogenic treatments, IFN-γ and IL-10 production were measured from splenocyte ex vivo recall cultures at 9 weeks of age, a time point at which the mice had received two doses of the indicated CNPs. Total splenocytes from individual mice were cultured in the presence of OVA323–339, chromogranin A359–372, insulin A14–29, insulin B9–23, GAD65286–300, GAD65515–524, IGRP206–214, HSP60437–460, or ZnT8345–359 (20 μg/mL) for 72 hours (Figure 3BJ). The treatment of NOD mice with CNP-T1D significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ secreted upon splenocyte culture in the presence of insulin A14–20, insulin B9–23, and IGRP437–460, while also increasing the level of IL-10 secreted upon splenocyte culture in the presence of insulin A14–20, insulin B9–23, GAD65286–300, GAD65515–524, and chromogranin A359–372 (Figure 3CH). In contrast, CNP-Insulin only decreased the level of IFN-γ secreted upon splenocyte culture in the presence of insulin A14–20, insulin B9–23, and IGRP437–460. While CNP-GAD65 treatment increased the level of IL-10 secreted upon splenocyte culture similar to CNP-T1D, CNP-GAD65 treatment did not significantly modulate the level of IFN-γ secreted (Figure 3E). Lastly, CNP-Chromogranin A significantly decreased the level of IFN-γ secreted upon splenocyte culture in the presence of chromogranin A359–372 and IGRP437–460 (Figure 3GH). Therefore, splenocytes from CNP-T1D treated mice additively presented the functional changes for splenocytes from mice that had been treated with CNP-Insulin, CNP-GAD65, or CNP-Chromogranin A alone. These findings indicate that CNP-T1D induced the broadest overall tolerogenic phenotype in the self-reactive T cells, and this modulation of the Ag-specific T cell response to T1D-asscoaited peptides correlates with the disease course data (Figure 3A).

CNP-T1D induces a regulatory phenotype within the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes, and pancreas

To confirm the ex vivo findings following treatment with CNP-T1D versus treatment with the individual proteins alone, splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry (Figure 4A). CNP-T1D or CNP-Chromogranin A treatment significantly increased the number of total CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and monocytes increased within the spleen, as compared to Unloaded CNP treated mice. When comparing the phenotype of the CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and monocytes within the spleen, CNP-T1D treatment significantly increased the number of FoxP3+ and PD-1+ CD4+ T cells (Figure 4BC), as well as increasing the number of PD-L1+ and CD206+ macrophages and PD-L1+ monocytes (Figure 4B, EF). In contrast, CNP-GAD65 treatment, which also increased the level of secreted IL-10 similar to CNP-T1D treatment (Figure 3CG), increased the number of IFN-γ+ and IL-17+ CD4+ T cells within the spleen (Figure 4C). Additionally, the finding that CNP-GAD65 and CNP-T1D induced an increase in the level of IL-10 secreted, while not significantly increasing the number of IL-10+/CD4+ T cells within the spleen suggests that treatment induced an increase in the amount of IL-10 secreted per IL-10+/CD4+ T cell at the 9 weeks of age time point. These present data correlate with our previously published data in the BDC2.5 transfer disease into NOD-scid mice (16). Taken together, the data show that while mice treated with the individual diabetogenic protein containing CNPs may induce some of the same regulatory alterations as CNP-T1D, it is only the mice that were treated with CNP-T1D that have the combined effect of decreasing IFN-γ and increasing IL-10.

Figure 4: CNP-T1D increases the number of FoxP3+ CD4+ T cells and regulatory APCs present within the spleen.

Figure 4:

Female NOD mice (n=5) were treated with either Unloaded CNP, CNP-Insulin, CNP-GAD65, CNP-Chromogranin A, or CNP-T1D (2.5 mg/dose) at 6 and 7 weeks of age, and splenocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative flow plots and gating scheme (singlets -> live cells ->) to get to the CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, macrophages, and monocytes is presented. (B) The number of the various immune cell populations within the spleen is presented. (C) The number of CD4+ T cells expressing FoxP3, IL-10, PD-1, IFN-γ, and IL-17 is presented. (D) The number of CD8+ T cells expressing CD122, PD-1, IFN-γ, and granzyme is presented. (E and F) The number of macrophages and monocytes expressing PD-L1, CD206, and CD80 is presented. The data are presented as the mean cell number ± SEM. Asterisks (*, **, ***, ****) indicate a statistically significant difference as compared to Unloaded CNP treated mice, p < 0.05, < 0.01, < 0.001, and < 0.0001 respectively. Data are representative of one experiment of two individual experiments.

To further assess the immune cell population differences, flow cytometry analysis of the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes, and pancreas was carried out at a later stage of disease (12 weeks of age, when controls begin to develop overt T1D) in NOD mice that had been treated with Unloaded CNP, CNP-T1D or the individual recombinant diabetogenic proteins at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age. CNP-T1D treatment increased the number of total immune cells within the spleen, while significantly decreasing the number of total immune cells within both the pancreatic lymph nodes and the pancreas (Figure 5A). When compared to the individual proteins, only CNP-T1D treatment significantly increased the number of CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and monocytes within the spleen (Figure 5B). The same pattern was found at 9 weeks of age, which is after only two doses of CNP-T1D (Figure 4B). Additionally, CNP-T1D significantly decreased the number of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells within the pancreatic lymph nodes and pancreas (Figure 5C and D). These findings indicate a shift of immune cells away from the disease-associated target tissue, i.e., the pancreas.

Figure 5: CNP-T1D increases the percentage of regulatory CD4+ T cells within the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes, and pancreas.

Figure 5:

Female NOD mice (n=5) were treated with either Unloaded CNP, CNP-Insulin, CNP-GAD65, CNP-Chromogranin A, or CNP-T1D (2.5 mg/dose) at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age. At 12 weeks of age spleens, pancreatic lymph nodes, and pancreata were collected for flow cytometry. (A) The total number of CD45hi cells were calculated for each tissue, as well as the number +/− S.E.M. of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, monocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils within the (B) spleen, (C) pancreatic lymph nodes, and (D) pancreas. The percentage of CD4+ T cells that expressed FoxP3, CTLA4, PD-1, IL-10, CCL3, IFN-γ, or IL-17, as well as the percentage of FoxP3+/CD4+ T cells that expressed CTLA-4, PD-1, and IL-10 is presented in heatmaps for the (E) spleen, (F) pancreatic lymph nodes, and (G) pancreas. Asterisks (*, **, ***, ****) indicate a statistically significant difference as compared to Unloaded CNP treated mice, p < 0.05, < 0.01, < 0.001, and < 0.0001 respectively. Data are representative of one experiment of two individual experiments.

We also assessed the phenotype of the CD4+ T cells in the various organs. The percentage of FoxP3+, CTLA-4+, and PD-1+ CD4+ T cells increased in both the spleen and pancreas of CNP-T1D treated mice (Figure 5EG). The present data show that CNP-GAD65 and CNP-T1D treatment increased the percentage of IL-10+ Treg cells within the spleen, pancreatic lymph nodes, and pancreas, while CNP-Chromogranin-A only increased the percentage within the pancreas (Figure 5EG and Supp. Figure 2). When considered with the CNP-T1D-induced decrease in the number of total immune cells and CD4+ T cells within the pancreas as compared to the Unloaded CNP treated NOD mice, this equates to a significant decrease in the number of IFN-γ+ and IL-17+ CD4+ T cells present within the pancreata along with an increase in Treg cells. This finding is consistent with the histopathology scoring data presented in Figure 2C and F. Together, the present findings suggest that CNP-T1D treatment induces a regulatory phenotype in an Ag-specific manner for multiple T cell specificities, and thereby inhibits the inflammatory immune response within the pancreas.

Discussion

Previous studies have attempted tolerogenic treatment of T1D by targeting individual diabetogenic antigens (Ags), with limited success (8, 3235). Indeed our attempts to prevent/delay onset of T1D in wildtype NOD mice using PLGA nanoparticles coupled with or encapsulating a number of dominant natural and hybrid diabetogenic peptide epitopes (Figure 1A and B) were unsuccessful even though these formulations were previously shown to robustly inhibit monospecific T1D induced by transfer of transgenic CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells into NOD.scid recipients (16, 18, 36). It is well established that the genesis of T1D in humans and NOD mice is characterized by the presence of autoreactive T cell and antibody (Ab) responses to multiple pancreatic β cell Ags which arise well before the onset of overt hyperglycemia (5, 2527) likely via epitope spreading (69). Thus, to determine if simultaneous tolerogenic targeting of multiple CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell diabetogenic epitopes may be required to block development of T1D in NOD mice, we assessed disease in mice treated with PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating either recombinant insulin, GAD65 or chromogranin A, alone or in combination (CNP-T1D), beginning at 6 weeks of age. Indeed, disease was only blocked in mice receiving CNP-T1D, but not in mice receiving nanoparticles encapsulating any of the individual diabetogenic proteins (Figures 2AC and 3A). This indicates that simultaneous targeting of multiple autoepitopes is required for efficient disease protection in a multi-determinant autoimmune disease to allow development of a critical mass of regulatory responses. Further, effective tolerance required 2–3 doses of CNP-T1D administered at 6, 7 and 12 weeks of age (Figure 2D).

In support of the requirement for multiple diabetogenic peptides to be contained within the Ag-specific tolerance treatment, e.g., CNP-T1D, we detected low, but significant and reproducible, pro-inflammatory IFN-γ production by NOD T cells in response to at least eight different diabetogenic peptide epitopes within six different β cell proteins (chromogranin, insulin, GAD65, IGRP, HSP60 and ZnT8) by 6 weeks of age (Figure 1C), a time point well prior to development of overt T1D which onsets between 13–16 weeks of age in our vivarium. Additionally, responses to seven of the eight peptides show a trend toward an increase by 9 weeks of age and no responses were seen in 6 week-old T1D-resistant C57BL/6 mice. The breadth of β cell autoepitopes targeted in NOD mice is perhaps not surprising as epitope spreading has been previously well-documented in various experimental autoimmune disease models including experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) (37) and T1D in NOD mice (38, 39). Epitope spreading can occur to different epitopes within the same self-Ag (intramolecular epitope spreading) or to epitopes on a different self-Ags (intermolecular epitope spreading) and has critical implications to tolerance-based immunotherapy as the effectiveness would require induction of unresponsiveness to multiple autoepitopes in pre-established disease (7). Relevant to disease therapy and the location of initial autoreactive CD4+ T cell activation, we have shown in relapsing EAE induced by priming SJL/J mice with PLP178–191/CFA that naïve CFSE-labeled PLP139–151-specific transgenic T cells which drive the primary relapse (intramolecular epitope spreading) are initially activated directly within the central nervous system (CNS) target organ and not in the draining cervical lymph nodes or other peripheral lymphoid organs (40). The spread epitope-specific T cells are activated by peripherally-derived myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) which infiltrate the CNS during the acute disease episode (41). Thus, epitope spreading takes place in a hierarchical order of peptide dominance and activation of the spread epitope-specific CD4+ T cells occurs within the inflamed target organ and can be inhibited by tolerance induction to the spread epitope (23). Therefore, blockade of disease-associated tissue inflammation and destruction by Ag-specific tolerance may also inhibit the activation of spread epitope-specific T cells that are responsive to peptides not contained within CNP-T1D. We have also shown that early life oligodendrocyte ablation using diptheria toxin A (DTA) in the C57BL/6 DTA mouse model (43) leads to a later life fatal, secondary demyelinating disease driven by myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-specific T cells developing approximately 30 weeks after recovering from initial oligodendrocyte loss and demyelination. Importantly, MOG35–55-specific tolerance induced by MOG35–55-encapsulating PLGA nanoparticles treatment blocks the progression of this late-onset disease (44). Thus, Ag-specific CNP treatment can function as a potent therapeutic treatment in chronic autoimmunity induced by either inflammatory T cells (EAE) or secondary to non-inflammatory cell death (DTA mice) in the target organ.

In addition to assessing the Ag-specificity of CNP-T1D treatment, our studies demonstrate the durability of CNP-T1D-induced tolerance. Mice treated with CNP-T1D at 6, 7, and 11 weeks of age remained disease free through 25 weeks of age, i.e., at least 13.5 weeks post third dose administration (Figure 2A). Tolerance durability was assessed by the level of blood glucose remaining <250 mg/dL and a marked reduction in inflammatory cell infiltration into the pancreas leading to preserved islet architecture. We have previously demonstrated the durability of nanoparticle-induced Ag-specific tolerance and its ability to halt previously established autoimmune disease in myelin peptide/CFA-induced EAE models utilizing a single peptide to induce CD4+ T cell-mediated autoimmunity (15, 23). In addition to the ability of CNP-T1D to protect from T1D development in NOD mice treated at 6 weeks of age, we notably show similar protection in NOD mice treated beginning at 10 weeks of age a time equivalent to stage 2 T1D in humans. For tolerance approaches to effectively restore insulin function, patients will require a critical mass of functional β cells. T1D is staged based on presence of β cell-specific Abs and clinical signs of disease: stage 1 T1D patients have two or more unique β cell-specific Abs with normoglycemia and no clinical symptoms; stage 2 T1D patients progress to dysglycemia and no clinical symptoms, and stage 3 T1D patients progress to dysglycemia and symptomatic disease (45). The combination of T cell and B cell activation results in β cell loss and inflammatory lesions within pancreatic islets (insulitis). Studies in NOD mice (28) and humans (29, 30) suggest that 40–85% of the β cell mass must be destroyed by onset of diabetes (stage 3 in humans). Therefore, tolerogenic therapies administered prior to complete destruction of the β cell mass will serve the greatest benefit for patients. The utilization of the present multi-protein tolerance induction platform may also prove to be efficacious in the preservation of β cell transplants. If true, then therapy would not be limited to pre-diabetic and early onset T1D patients, but also useful for T1D patients with late-stage disease.

In addition to the profound protection from T1D development, CNP-T1D treatment inhibited proinflammatory IFN-γ secretion and increased anti-inflammatory IL-10 secretion, as compared to the control Unloaded CNP treated mice (Figure 3BJ). CNP-T1D treatment significantly inhibited the secretion of IFN-γ upon culture of splenocytes in the presence of the primary epitopes contained within CNP-T1D, e.g., insulin, GAD65, and chromogranin A, as well as the response to a non-targeted bystander epitope on IGRP. Additionally, CNP-T1D treatment significantly increased the secreted level of the regulatory cytokine, IL-10, upon culture of splenocytes in all ex vivo activation conditions. These results suggest that CNP-T1D treatment induced a regulatory phenotype within the spleen. Tolerance thus appears to be driven by both intrinsic Ag-specific anergy and resultant prevention of T1D by increasing the numbers of FoxP3+ regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells, IL-10 producing CD4+ T cells (Tr1), and PD-1+ T cells in the spleen as well as PD-L1+ and CD206+ macrophages (Figures 4C, 4E, 4F, and 5E) (14). CNP-T1D treatment significantly decreased the number of both total CD45hi cells, CD4+ T cells, and CD8+ T cells within the pancreas (Figure 5A and 5D) supporting the hypothesis that while not every potential diabetogenic protein was contained within the CNP-T1D nanoparticle, T cells specific for spread epitopes were not activated following treatment. This hypothesis is supported by the CNP-T1D-induced decrease in the level of IFN-γ secreted upon culture of splenocytes in the presence of IGRP206–214, not contained within CNP-T1D (Figure 1C). Additionally, of the CD4+ T cells still present within the pancreata of CNP-T1D treatment NOD mice, an increased percentage of these CD4+ T cells were of a regulatory/tolerogenic phenotype (FoxP3+, CTLA-4+, PD-1+, and IL-10+) (Figure 5G). Likewise, an increased percentage of CD4+ T cells within the pancreatic lymph nodes of CNP-T1D treated NOD mice were CTLA-4+ (Figure 5F). These data demonstrate that CNP-T1D induces tolerance to multiple diabetogenic epitopes in the spontaneous NOD model by inducing regulatory T cell responses. Notably, we have recently published that protection in NOD.scid recipients of activated transgenic BDC2.5 T cells induced by tolerization with PLGA nanoparticle encapsulating the chromogranin p31 mimotope peptide, was reversed by both depletion of Treg cells using anti-CD25 (16) and administration of anti-IL-10 (46).

The major advantage of our nanoparticle tolerance delivery system is that induction and maintenance of unresponsiveness is due to the activation of autoantigen-specific Treg cells. The majority of current FDA approved therapies for the treatment of autoimmune disease focus on the reduction of disease symptoms using anti-inflammatory drugs, e.g., corticosteroids, or biologicals, e.g., tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) inhibitors (47). However, long-term use of these drugs is associated with adverse side effects such as increased susceptibility to opportunistic infections and tumors (48). Additional T1D therapies in current development, e.g., anti-CD3, are broadly suppressive and transient and do not treat the root cause of disease by specifically targeting only autoantigen-specific pathogenic T cells. Treg cells are recognized to play a central role in the maintenance of peripheral self-tolerance. Experimental evidence from preclinical animal models has shown that transfer of natural Treg cells (nTregs) can regulate immune responses to self-Ags (4951). To date the translation of in vitro expanded Treg cells for treatment of autoimmune diseases has been hampered by issues such as production efficiency, stability, and the risks of pan suppression. Antigen-specific Treg cells have been shown to preferentially suppress Ag-specific CD4+ T cell responses, and to have enhanced disease-associated regulatory function in comparison to polyclonal Treg cells. For example, similar to other findings (5254), we have shown that 10-fold fewer induced PLP139–151-specific Treg cells (2×105) (55) were sufficient to suppress PLP139–151-induced EAE in SJL/J mice as compared with polyclonal natural Treg cells where a minimum of 2×106 cells were required (49).

Immune tolerance to circulating Ags and cells is carried out in the spleen and liver (56, 57), as these organs filter the blood and contain phagocytic myeloid cells which evolved to clear and dispose of the large number of apoptotic cells generated by normal cell turnover in the hematopoietic system. Efferocytosis is the process by which dead, dying, and apoptotic cells are cleared from the blood, and this process is vital for the maintenance of immune homeostasis. It has been hypothesized that dysregulation of this process may be involved in several autoimmune disease states (58, 59). We have previously shown that Ag-encapsulated carboxylated PLGA nanoparticles serve as surrogates for apoptotic bodies and following intravenous infusion are specifically uptaken by APCs in the splenic marginal zone and liver via the macrophage receptor with collagenous structure (MARCO) scavenger receptor (60) which we have shown is necessary for induction of carboxylated PLGA nanoparticle tolerance (15). MARCO has been shown to be responsible for uptake of apoptotic cells (61) and negatively charged nanoparticles (62). Following MARCO engagement, the APCs upregulate PD-L1 and secrete IL-10 and TGFβ and the individual encapsulated diabetogenic proteins within CNP-T1D are processed and multiple epitopes from each protein are presented to both activated and naïve Ag-specific T cells in the tolerogenic environment resulting in anergy induction (23) and the activation of iTreg cells and Tr1 cells (14). The Treg cells then inhibit the autoimmune T cell responses restoring overall immunologic homeostasis.

In summary, CNP-T1D treatment effectively and efficiently prevents induction and progression of spontaneous T1D in NOD mice preventing autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic β cells in an Ag-specific manner. Compared to other tolerance inducing approaches tested in NOD mice (6366), CNP-T1D- induced tolerance requires fewer treatments and generates more durable protection. Mechanistically, CNP-T1D induces the activation of Treg cells and Tr1 cells which regulate diabetogenic T cell responses to both epitopes contained within the encapsulated β cell proteins as well as bystander suppression, i.e., blocking IFN-γ production by diabetogenic T cells specific for non-targeted Ags (IGRP and ZnT8). CNP-T1D appears to be a highly promising approach for translation to testing in human T1D in light of the ease of GMP production of Ag-encapsulating PLGA nanoparticles and the demonstrated success of this Ag delivery platform in inducing gliadin-specific tolerance in a phase 1/2a human celiac disease clinical trial (20).

Supplementary Material

1
2

Key Findings.

  1. T1D is initiated and driven by multiple diabetogenic CD4+ T cell epitopes.

  2. Tolerance to individual epitopes/proteins fails to inhibit T1D development.

  3. Tolerance to a cocktail of diabetogenic proteins inhibits T1D development.

Acknowledgements:

We gratefully acknowledge the Northwestern Mouse Histopathology & Phenotyping Core for their services. We acknowledge the support from all members of the Miller laboratory.

Funding:

This research was supported by grants to S.D.M. from COUR Pharmaceutical Development Company, Inc.; the National Institutes of Health (R01 AI155678), the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation (2-SRA-2018-566-S-B), the David and Amy Fulton Foundation, and the Cramer Family Foundation. T.N. was supported by JDRF Postdoctoral Fellowship 3-PDF-2018-582-A-N.

Abbreviations:

Ab

antibody

Ag

antigen

APCs

antigen-presenting cells

CNP-T1D

COUR nanoparticles encapsulating insulin, chromogranin A and GAD65

EAE

experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

CNS

central nervous system

ECDI

ethylene carbodiimide

GAD65

glutamic acid decarboxylase 65: IA-2islet antigen-2

IGRP

islet specific glucose 6 phosphate catalytic subunit related protein

IMP

immune modifying nanoparticle

MARCO

macrophage receptor with collagenous structure

MOG

myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein

NP

nanoparticles

PLGA

poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)

T1D

type 1 diabetes

TIMP

tolerance inducing microparticles

Treg cell

regulatory T cells

ZnT8

zinc transporter 8

References

  • 1.2020. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mobasseri M, Shirmohammadi M, Amiri T, Vahed N, Hosseini Fard H, and Ghojazadeh M. 2020. Prevalence and incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Promot. Perspect 10: 98–115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pathak V, Pathak NM, O’Neill CL, Guduric-Fuchs J, and Medina RJ. 2019. Therapies for type 1 diabetes: Current scenario and future perspectives. Clin. Med. Insights Endocrinol. Diabetes 12: 1179551419844521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nakayama M, Abiru N, Moriyama H, Babaya N, Liu E, Miao D, Yu L, Wegmann DR, Hutton JC, Elliott JF, and Eisenbarth GS. 2005. Prime role for an insulin epitope in the development of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Nature 435: 220–223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Di Lorenzo TP, Peakman M, and Roep BO. 2007. Translational mini-review series on type 1 diabetes: Systematic analysis of T cell epitopes in autoimmune diabetes. Clin. Exp. Immunol 148: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Culina S, Boitard C, and Mallone R. 2011. Antigen-based immune therapeutics for type 1 diabetes: magic bullets or ordinary blanks? Clin. Dev. Immunol 2011;2011:286248: 286248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vanderlugt CL, and Miller SD. 2002. Epitope spreading in immune-mediated diseases: implications for immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol 2: 85–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Luo X, Herold KC, and Miller SD. 2010. Immunotherapy of type 1 diabetes: where are we and where should we be going? Immunity 32: 488–499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Prasad S, Kohm AP, McMahon JS, Luo X, and Miller SD. 2012. Pathogenesis of NOD diabetes is initiated by reactivity to the insulin B chain 9–23 epitope and involves functional epitope spreading. J. Autoimm 39: 347–353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stadinski BD, Delong T, Reisdorph N, Reisdorph R, Powell RL, Armstrong M, Piganelli JD, Barbour G, Bradley B, Crawford F, Marrack P, Mahata SK, Kappler JW, and Haskins K. 2010. Chromogranin A is an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. Nat. Immunol 11: 225–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wenzlau JM, Juhl K, Yu L, Moua O, Sarkar SA, Gottlieb P, Rewers M, Eisenbarth GS, Jensen J, Davidson HW, and Hutton JC. 2007. The cation efflux transporter ZnT8 (Slc30A8) is a major autoantigen in human type 1 diabetes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 17040–17045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nikoopour E, Sandrock C, Huszarik K, Krougly O, Lee-Chan E, Masteller EL, Bluestone JA, and Singh B. 2011. Cutting edge: vasostatin-1-derived peptide ChgA29–42 is an antigenic epitope of diabetogenic BDC2.5 T cells in nonobese diabetic mice. J. Immunol 186: 3831–3835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miller SD, Turley DM, and Podojil JR. 2007. Antigen-specific tolerance strategies for the prevention and treatment of autoimmune disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol 7: 665–677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pearson RM, Podojil JR, Shea LD, King NJC, Miller SD, and Getts DR. 2019. Overcoming challenges in treating autoimmuntity: Development of tolerogenic immune-modifying nanoparticles. Nanomed 18: 282–291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Getts DR, Martin AJ, McCarthy DP, Terry RL, Hunter ZN, Yap WT, Getts MT, Pleiss M, Luo X, King NJ, Shea LD, and Miller SD. 2012. Microparticles bearing encephalitogenic peptides induce T-cell tolerance and ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat. Biotechnol 30: 1217–1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Prasad S, Neef T, Xu D, Podojil JR, Getts DR, Shea LD, and Miller SD. 2018. Tolerogenic Ag-PLG nanoparticles induce Tregs to suppress activated diabetogenic CD4 and CD8 T cells. J. Autoimmun 89: 112–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Freitag TL, Podojil JR, Pearson RM, Fokta FJ, Sahl C, Messing M, Andersson LC, Leskinen K, Saavalainen P, Hoover LI, Huang K, Phippard D, Maleki S, King NJC, Shea LD, Miller SD, Meri SK, and Getts DR. 2020. Gliadin nanoparticles induce immune tolerance to gliadin in mouse models of celiac disease. Gastroenterol 158: 1667–1681.e1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jamison BL, Neef T, Goodspeed A, Bradley B, Baker RL, Miller SD, and Haskins K. 2019. Nanoparticles containing an insulin-ChgA hybrid peptide protect from transfer of autoimmune diabetes by shifting the balance between effector T cells and regulatory T cells. J. Immunol 203: 48–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Smarr CB, Hsu CL, Byrne AJ, Miller SD, and Bryce PJ. 2011. Antigen-fixed leukocytes tolerize Th2 responses in mouse models of allergy. J. Immunol 187: 5090–5098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kelly CP, Murray JA, Leffler DA, Getts DR, Bledsoe AC, Smithson G, First MR, Morris A, Boyne M, Elhofy A, Wu TT, Podojil JR, Miller SD, and Group TAKS. 2021. TAK-101 nanoparticles induce gluten-specific tolerance in celiac disease: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Gastroenterol 161: 66–80 e68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thayer TC, Wilson SB, and Mathews CE. 2010. Use of nonobese diabetic mice to understand human type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am 39: 541–561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Smarr CB, Yap WT, Neef TP, Pearson RM, Hunter ZN, Ifergan I, Getts DR, Bryce PJ, Shea LD, and Miller SD. 2016. Biodegradable antigen-associated PLG nanoparticles tolerize Th2-mediated allergic airway inflammation pre- and postsensitization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: 5059–5064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hunter Z, McCarthy DP, Yap WT, Harp CT, Getts DR, Shea LD, and Miller SD. 2014. A biodegradable nanoparticle platform for the induction of antigen-specific immune tolerance for treatment of autoimmune disease. ACS Nano 8: 2148–2160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carrero JA, Calderon B, Towfic F, Artyomov MN, and Unanue ER. 2013. Defining the transcriptional and cellular landscape of type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse. PLoS One 8: e59701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lo B, Swafford AD, Shafer-Weaver KA, Jerome LF, Rakhlin L, Mathern DR, Callahan CA, Jiang P, Davison LJ, Stevens HE, Lucas CL, White J, von Borstel R, Todd JA, and Lenardo MJ. 2011. Antibodies against insulin measured by electrochemiluminescence predicts insulitis severity and disease onset in non-obese diabetic mice and can distinguish human type 1 diabetes status. J. Transl. Med 9:203.doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trembleau S, Penna G, Gregori S, Magistrelli G, Isacchi A, and Adorini L. 2000. Early Th1 response in unprimed nonobese diabetic mice to the tyrosine phosphatase-like insulinoma-associated protein 2, an autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. J. Immunol 165: 6748–6755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tian J, Gregori S, Adorini L, and Kaufman DL. 2001. The frequency of high avidity T cells determines the hierarchy of determinant spreading. J. Immunol 166: 7144–7150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sreenan S, Pick AJ, Levisetti M, Baldwin AC, Pugh W, and Polonsky KS. 1999. Increased beta-cell proliferation and reduced mass before diabetes onset in the nonobese diabetic mouse. Diabetes 48: 989–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Foulis AK, Liddle CN, Farquharson MA, Richmond JA, and Weir RS. 1986. The histopathology of the pancreas in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: a 25-year review of deaths in patients under 20 years of age in the United Kingdom. Diabetologia 29: 267–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Klinke DJ 2nd. 2008. Extent of beta cell destruction is important but insufficient to predict the onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus. PLoS One 3: e1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Patterson SJ, Pesenacker AM, Wang AY, Gillies J, Mojibian M, Morishita K, Tan R, Kieffer TJ, Verchere CB, Panagiotopoulos C, and Levings MK. 2016. T regulatory cell chemokine production mediates pathogenic T cell attraction and suppression. J. Clin. Invest 126: 1039–1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Robert S, Gysemans C, Takiishi T, Korf H, Spagnuolo I, Sebastiani G, Van Huynegem K, Steidler L, Caluwaerts S, Demetter P, Wasserfall CH, Atkinson MA, Dotta F, Rottiers P, Van Belle TL, and Mathieu C. 2014. Oral delivery of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD)-65 and IL10 by Lactococcus lactis reverses diabetes in recent-onset NOD mice. Diabetes 63: 2876–2887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yamamoto T, Yamato E, Tashiro F, Sato T, Noso S, Ikegami H, Tamura S, Yanagawa Y, and Miyazaki JI. 2004. Development of autoimmune diabetes in glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) knockout NOD mice. Diabetologia 47: 221–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brezar V, Culina S, Gagnerault MC, and Mallone R. 2012. Short-term subcutaneous insulin treatment delays but does not prevent diabetes in NOD mice. Eur. J. Immunol 42: 1553–1561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jhala G, Selck C, Chee J, Kwong CJ, Pappas EG, Thomas HE, Kay TWH, and Krishnamurthy B. 2021. Tolerance to proinsulin-1 reduces autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice. Front. Immunol 12: 645817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jamison BL, DiLisio JE, Beard KS, Neef T, Bradley B, Goodman J, Gill RG, Miller SD, Baker RL, and Haskins K. 2022. Tolerogenic delivery of a hybrid insulin peptide markedly prolongs islet graft survival in the non-obese diabetic (NOD) mouse. Diabetes 71: 483–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McRae BL, Vanderlugt CL, Dal Canto MC, and Miller SD. 1995. Functional evidence for epitope spreading in the relapsing pathology of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Exp. Med 182: 75–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kaufman DL, Clare-Salzler M, Tian J, Forsthuber T, Ting GS, Robinson P, Atkinson MA, Sercarz EE, Tobin AJ, and Lehmann PV. 1993. Spontaneous loss of T-cell tolerance to glutamic acid decarboxylase in murine insulin-dependent diabetes. Nature 366: 69–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tisch R, Yang XD, Singer SM, Liblau RS, Fugger L, and McDevitt HO. 1993. Immune response to glutamic acid decarboxylase correlates with insulitis in non-obese diabetic mice. Nature 366: 72–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.McMahon EJ, Bailey SL, Castenada CV, Waldner H, and Miller SD. 2005. Epitope spreading initiates in the CNS in two mouse models of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Med 11: 335–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bailey SL, Schreiner B, McMahon EJ, and Miller SD. 2007. CNS myeloid DCs presenting endogenous myelin peptides ‘preferentially’ polarize CD4+ T(H)-17 cells in relapsing EAE. Nat. Immunol 8: 172–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Munz C, Lunemann JD, Getts MT, and Miller SD. 2009. Antiviral immune responses: triggers of or triggered by autoimmunity? Nat. Rev. Immunol 9: 246–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Traka M, Arasi K, Avila RL, Podojil JR, Christakos A, Miller SD, Soliven B, and Popko B. 2010. A genetic mouse model of adult-onset, pervasive central nervous system demyelination with robust remyelination. Brain 133: 3017–3029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Traka M, Podojil JR, McCarthy DP, Miller SD, and Popko B. 2016. Oligodendrocyte death results in immune-mediated CNS demyelination. Nat. Neurosci 19: 65–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Insel RA, Dunne JL, Atkinson MA, Chiang JL, Dabelea D, Gottlieb PA, Greenbaum CJ, Herold KC, Krischer JP, Lernmark A, Ratner RE, Rewers MJ, Schatz DA, Skyler JS, Sosenko JM, and Ziegler AG. 2015. Staging presymptomatic type 1 diabetes: a scientific statement of JDRF, the Endocrine Society, and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 38: 1964–1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Neef T, Ifergan I, Beddow S, Penaloza-MacMaster P, Haskins K, Shea LD, Podojil JR, and Miller SD. 2021. Tolerance induced by antigen-loaded PLG nanoparticles affects the phenotype and trafficking of transgenic CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. Cells 10:3445. 10.3390/cells10123445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Smolen JS, van der Heijde D, Dougados M, van Vollenhoven R, McInnes IB, Bijlsma JWJ, Burmester GR, de Wit M, Falzon L, and Landewe R. 2020. Efficacy of pharmacological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis 79: 744–759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wang W, Zhou H, and Liu L. 2018. Side effects of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review. Eur. J. Med. Chem 158: 502–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kohm AP, Carpentier PA, Anger HA, and Miller SD. 2002. Cutting edge: CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells suppress antigen-specific autoreactive immune responses and central nervous system inflammation during active experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol 169: 4712–4716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu H, Hu B, Xu D, and Liew FY. 2003. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells cure murine colitis: the role of IL-10, TGF-beta, and CTLA4. J. Immunol 171: 5012–5017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.DiPaolo RJ, Glass DD, Bijwaard KE, and Shevach EM. 2005. CD4+CD25+ T cells prevent the development of organ-specific autoimmune disease by inhibiting the differentiation of autoreactive effector T cells. J. Immunol 175: 7135–7142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Tang Q, Henriksen KJ, Bi M, Finger EB, Szot G, Ye J, Masteller EL, McDevitt H, Bonyhadi M, and Bluestone JA. 2004. In vitro-expanded antigen-specific regulatory T cells suppress autoimmune diabetes. J. Exp. Med 199: 1455–1465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Tarbell KV, Yamazaki S, Olson K, Toy P, and Steinman RM. 2004. CD25+ CD4+ T cells, expanded with dendritic cells presenting a single autoantigenic peptide, suppress autoimmune diabetes. J. Exp. Med 199: 1467–1477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.DiPaolo RJ, Brinster C, Davidson TS, Andersson J, Glass D, and Shevach EM. 2007. Autoantigen-specific TGFbeta-induced Foxp3+ regulatory T cells prevent autoimmunity by inhibiting dendritic cells from activating autoreactive T cells. J. Immunol 179: 4685–4693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang H, Podojil JR, Chang J, Luo X, and Miller SD. 2010. TGF-beta-induced myelin peptide-specific regulatory T cells mediate antigen-specific suppression of induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol 184: 6629–6636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Tiegs G, and Lohse AW. 2010. Immune tolerance: what is unique about the liver. J. Autoimmun 34: 1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hosseini H, Li Y, Kanellakis P, Tay C, Cao A, Tipping P, Bobik A, Toh BH, and Kyaw T. 2015. Phosphatidylserine liposomes mimic apoptotic cells to attenuate atherosclerosis by expanding polyreactive IgM producing B1a lymphocytes. Cardiovasc. Res 106: 443–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Abdolmaleki F, Farahani N, Gheibi Hayat SM, Pirro M, Bianconi V, Barreto GE, and Sahebkar A. 2018. The role of efferocytosis in autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol 9: 1645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Doran AC, Yurdagul A Jr., and Tabas I. 2020. Efferocytosis in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol 20: 254–267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jing J, Yang IV, Hui L, Patel JA, Evans CM, Prikeris R, Kobzik L, O’Connor BP, and Schwartz DA. 2013. Role of macrophage receptor with collagenous structure in innate immune tolerance. J. Immunol 190: 6360–6367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Allen JE, and Ruckerl D. 2017. The silent undertakers: Macrophages programmed for efferocytosis. Immunity 47: 810–812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kanno S, Furuyama A, and Hirano S. 2007. A murine scavenger receptor MARCO recognizes polystyrene nanoparticles. Toxicol. Sci 97: 398–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Pagni PP, Chaplin J, Wijaranakula M, Wesley JD, Granger J, Cracraft J, O’Brien C, Perdue N, Kumar V, Li S, Ratliff SS, Roach A, Misquith A, Chan CL, Coppieters K, and von Herrath M. 2021. Multicomponent plasmid protects mice from spontaneous autoimmune diabetes. Diabetes 71: 157–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yoon YM, Lewis JS, Carstens MR, Campbell-Thompson M, Wasserfall CH, Atkinson MA, and Keselowsky BG. 2015. A combination hydrogel microparticle-based vaccine prevents type 1 diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. Sci. Rep 5: 13155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lee JS, Han P, Chaudhury R, Khan S, Bickerton S, McHugh MD, Park HB, Siefert AL, Rea G, Carballido JM, Horwitz DA, Criscione J, Perica K, Samstein R, Rageb R, Kim D, and Fahmy TM. 2021. Metabolic and immunomodulatory control of type 1 diabetes via orally delivered bile-acid-polymer nanocarriers of insulin or rapamycin. Nat. Biomed. Eng 5: 983–997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Alleva DG, Rezaee M, Yip L, Ren G, Rosenberg J, Concepcion W, Escher A, Shabahang S, and Thakor AS. 2020. Reversal of hyperglycemia and suppression of type 1 diabetes in the NOD mouse with apoptotic DNA immunotherapy (ADi), ADi-100. Biomedicines 4;8(3):53. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8030053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES