Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nat Prod. 2021 May 26;84(6):1831–1837. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00367

Sinularamides A–G, Terpenoid-Derived Spermidine and Spermine Conjugates with Casitas B-Lineage Lymphoma Proto-Oncogene B (Cbl-b) Inhibitory Activities from a Sinularia sp. Soft Coral

Wei Jiang 1, Dongdong Wang 2, Brice A P Wilson 3, Donna Voeller 4, Heidi R Bokesch 5, Emily A Smith 6, Stanley Lipkowitz 7, Barry R O’Keefe 8, Kirk R Gustafson 9
PMCID: PMC9341130  NIHMSID: NIHMS1825072  PMID: 34038132

Abstract

An extract of a Sinularia sp. soft coral showed inhibitory activity against the E3-ubiquitin ligase casitas B-lineage lymphoma proto-oncogene B (Cbl-b). Subsequent bioassay-guided separation of the extract provided a series of terpenoid-derived spermidine and spermine amides that were named sinularamides A–G (17). Compounds 17 represent new natural products; however, sinularamide A (1) was previously reported as a synthetic end product. The structures of sinularamides A–G (17) were elucidated by analysis of spectroscopic and spectrometric data from NMR, IR, and HRESIMS experiments and by comparison with literature data. All of the isolated compounds showed Cbl-b inhibitory activities with IC50 values that ranged from approximately 6.5 to 33 μM.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1825072-f0004.jpg


In many cases, tumor growth and lack of anticancer immunity can be attributed to insufficient T cell stimulation by tumor cells or the induction of tolerance in the tumor-reactive T cell population.1,2 Casitas B-lineage lymphoma proto-oncogene B (Cbl-b), a ubiquitin ligase (E3), acts as a negative regulator of both T cell and B cell activation.3 In the absence of Cbl-b, T cells are hyperproliferative and able to be fully activated even without CD28 costimulatory signaling, and T cells that lack Cbl-b have increased antitumor activity.35 In addition, natural killer (NK) cells in mice lacking Cbl-b exhibit enhanced antitumor activity.6 Thus, inhibition of Cbl-b activity could enhance the adaptive and innate immune system and help facilitate antitumor immunotherapies.7 As part of a search for small molecule inhibitors of Cbl-b from natural sources,8 a prefractionated sample from the organic solvent extract of a Sinularia sp. soft coral was found to inhibit the ubiquitin ligase activity of Cbl-b.

Sinularia is a prominent genus of soft coral in the family Alcyoniidae with 166 described species, and it has proven to be a rich source of secondary metabolites, particularly cembranoid diterpenes and steroids.9 Spermidine- or spermine-based aliphatic amines are widely distributed polycationic molecules, which have two or more amine groups in linear hydrocarbon chains.10 They play important roles in a variety of physiological processes such as signal transduction, gene expression, cell proliferation, chromatin organization, and cell death.10 Some of the bioactivities have been related to their cationic nature, because they can interact with negatively charged macromolecules such as DNA, RNA, and proteins. It has also been shown that they can bind to specific positions or structural motifs in macromolecules via multiple noncovalent interactions, thereby affecting the structure and function of their macromolecular targets.1012 Among the numerous compounds isolated from Sinularia soft corals, spermidine or spermine derivatives are rare.1316 These primarily consist of fatty acid substituted derivatives, and only one compound previously reported from Sinularia contained polyprenylated spermidine or spermine moieties. This compound was named sinulamide, and it was initially assigned structure 1 by the Fusetani group.16 Their subsequent synthetic studies provided compound 1, but this revealed that the natural product sinulamide was actually a double bond isomer where the C-2/C-3 olefin had Z geometry. Herein, we describe the isolation and assignment of a new natural product we are calling sinularamide A (1), which has the same structure as the previously reported synthetic product 1,16 and six new metabolites named sinularamides B–G (27) from a Palau collection of a Sinularia sp. soft coral. The Cbl-b inhibitory activities of all the isolated metabolites were also evaluated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Bioassay-guided separation of the Sinularia extract on diol solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges followed by C18 HPLC yield seven prenylated spermidine or spermine derivatives. These comprised a new natural product named sinularamide A (1), which was previously generated via a synthetic effort,16 along with the six related compounds sinularamides B–G (27). All of these soft coral metabolites showed significant Cbl-b inhibitory activities with IC50 values that ranged from 6.5 to 33 μM.

Sinularamide A (1) was isolated as a colorless oil. Its molecular formula of C34H66N4O2+ was established from HRESIMS measurements of its doubly charged [M]2+ molecular ion with m/z 273.2612. The molecular formula of 1 was isomeric with that previously reported for sinulamide.16 The 1H and 13C NMR data for 1 and sinulamide were also highly similar. The only differences in the NMR data were resonances associated with the C-2/C-3 olefin, which was definitively established as Z in sinulamide and assigned as E in sinularamide A (1) based on NOE correlations between H-2/H-4 and H-2/NH-21. The NMR data that we recorded for sinularamide A (1) exactly matched the data reported for synthetic 1,16 which thus confirmed the assigned structure.

graphic file with name nihms-1825072-f0005.jpg

Sinularamide B (2) was obtained as a colorless oil, and its molecular formula of C31H58N3O+, with five degrees of unsaturation, was determined by HRESIMS measurements ([M]+ m/z 488.4593, calcd for C31H58N3O+, 488.4574). The IR spectrum displayed absorption bands at 3420 cm−1 for amine and 1685 cm−1 for conjugated amide functionalities. A linear geranylgeranylic acid diterpenoid moiety with all E olefins like that seen in 1 was recognized from characteristic 1H and 13C NMR data (Tables 1 and 2), as well as COSY, NOESY, and HMBC data (Figure 1). The remaining signals in the 1H and 13C NMR spectra were largely attributed to a spermidine unit, including one exchangeable proton δH 7.99 (1H, t, J = 5.8 Hz, NH-21), four deshielded N-methyls [δH 2.99 (6H, s) and 2.77 (6H, s); δc 50.1 (2C) and 42.2 (2C)], four nitrogen bearing methylenes (δc 62.3, 61.6, 55.9, and 35.4), and three aliphatic methylenes (δc 22.6, 20.8, and 19.1). HMBC correlations from the N-methyl groups H3-31, H3-32 to C-24, and C-26, as well as H3-33 and H3-34 to C-29, led to the assignment of the N25,N25,N30,N30-tetramethylspermidine moiety. The deshielded chemical shifts of C-24, C-26, C-31, and C-32 were consistent with the presence of an N-25 quaternary amine group. The linkage between the diterpenoid and spermidine subunits was confirmed by HMBC correlations from H-22 and H-2 to C-1 (δc 166.5) and from NH-21 to C-1 and C-22; thus, the structure of sinularamide B (2) was defined as shown (Figure 1).

Table 1.

13C NMR Spectroscopic Data (150 MHz) for Compounds 27 in DMSO-d6 (δC, Type)

positiona 2 3 4 5 6 7
1/1′ 166.5, C 166.4, C 166.4, C 166.4, C 166.8, C 166.4, C
2/2′ 118.5, CH 118.4, CH 118.4, CH 118.4, CH 118.8, CH 118.4, CH
3/3′ 152.3, C 152.3, C 152.2, C 152.2, C 152.7, C 152.2, C
4/4′ 40.3, CH2 40.3, CH2 40.2, CH2 40.2, CH2 40.7, CH2 40.1, CH2
5/5′ 25.8, CH2 25.8, CH2 25.8, CH2 25.8, CH2 26.2, CH2 25.8, CH2
6/6′ 123.4, CH 123.3, CH 123.3, CH 123.3, CH 123.8, CH 123.8, CH
7/7′ 135.2, C 135.1, C 135.1, C 135.1, C 135.5, C 134.3, C
8/8′ 39.3, CH2 39.3, CH2 39.4, CH2 39.4, CH2 39.5, CH2 35.0, CH2
9/9′ 26.3, CH2 26.2, CH2 26.2, CH2 26.2, CH2 26.5, CH2 30.8, CH2
10/10′ 124.0, CH 124.2, CH 124.1, CH 124.1, CH 124.8, CH 75.3, CH
11/11′ 134.5, C 134.5, C 134.4, C 134.4, C 134.1, C 147.2, C
12/12′ 39.3, CH2 39.3, CH2 39.4, CH2 39.4, CH2 35.3, CH2 31.6, CH2
13/13′ 26.1, CH2 26.1, CH2 26.1, CH2 26.1, CH2 30.8, CH2 25.9, CH2
14/14′ 124.2, CH 123.9, CH 123.9, CH 123.9, CH 76.4, CH 123.9, CH
15/15′ 130.8, C 130.7, C 130.7, C 130.7, C 143.6, C 131.2, C
16/16′ 25.6, CH3 25.6, CH3 25.5, CH3 25.5, CH3 18.4, CH3 25.6, CH3
17/17′ 17.8, CH3 17.6, CH3 17.6, CH3 17.6, CH3 112.8, CH2 17.6, CH3
18/18′ 15.8, CH3 15.8, CH3 15.8, CH3 15.8, CH3 16.2, CH3 111.0, CH2
19/19′ 15.9, CH3 15.8, CH3 15.8, CH3 15.8, CH3 16.2, CH3 15.7, CH3
20/20′ 17.6, CH3 17.8, CH3 17.7, CH3 17.7, CH3 18.2, CH3 17.8, CH3
22 35.4, CH2 35.4, CH2 35.4, CH2 35.4, CH2 35.8, CH2 35.4, CH2
23 22.6, CH2 22.7, CH2 22.5, CH2 22.5, CH2 23.0, CH2 22.7, CH2
24 61.6, CH2 61.6, CH2 61.6, CH2 61.6, CH2 62.0, CH2 61.6, CH2
26 62.3, CH2 62.3, CH2 62.2, CH2 62.2, CH2 62.7, CH2 62.3, CH2
27 19.1, CH2 19.0, CH2 19.0, CH2 19.0, CH2 19.4, CH2 19.0, CH2
28 20.8, CH2 19.0, CH2 19.0, CH2 19.0, CH2 19.4, CH2 19.0, CH2
29 55.9, CH2 62.3, CH2 62.2, CH2 62.2, CH2 63.1, CH2 62.7, CH2
31/32 50.1, CH3 50.1, CH3 50.1, CH3 50.1, CH3 50.5, CH3 50.1, CH3
33/34 42.2, CH3 50.1, CH3 50.1, CH3 50.1, CH3 50.5, CH3 50.1, CH3
35 61.6, CH2 61.2, CH2 61.2, CH2 60.7, CH2 60.3, CH2
36 22.7, CH2 22.6, CH2 22.6, CH2 20.9, CH2 20.5, CH2
37 35.4, CH2 34.2, CH2 35.6, CH2 36.6, CH2 36.2, CH2
39 161.5, C 169.6, C
40 22.6, CH3
14/10-OCOCH3 170.1, C 169.7, C
14/10-OCOCH3 21.3, CH3 20.9, CH3
a

Prime numbers are for compound 3.

Table 2.

1H NMR Spectroscopic Data (600 MHz) for Compounds 27 in DMSO-d6 [δH, Multiplet (mult.) (J in Hz)]

positiona 2 3 4 5 6 7
2/2′ 5.63, s 5.62, s 5.63, s 5.63, s 5.62, s 5.62, s
4/4′ 2.04, m 2.05, m 2.04, m 2.04, m 2.03, m 2.03, m
5/5′ 2.09, m 2.10, m 2.09, m 2.09, m 2.10, m 2.10, m
6/6′ 5.08, t (6.7) 5.09, t (6.7) 5.09, t (6.7) 5.09, t (6.7) 5.09, t (6.7) 5.07, t (6.7)
8/8′ 1.93, m 1.94, m 1.94, m 1.92, m 1.92, m 1.90, m
9/9′ 2.02, m 2.03, m 2.02, m 2.02, m 2.03, m 1.65, m
10/10′ 5.06, t (6.7) 5.07, t (6.7) 5.07, t (6.7) 5.06, t (6.7) 5.06, t (6.7) 5.03, t (6.7)
12/12′ 1.91, m 1.92, m 1.92, m 1.92, m 1.90, m 1.98, m
13/13′ 2.00, m 2.01, m 2.01, m 2.01, m 1.63, m 2.02, m
14/14′ 5.06, t (6.7) 5.07, t (6.7) 5.07, t (6.7) 5.06, t (6.7) 5.00, t (6.7) 5.09, t (6.7)
16/16′ 1.62, s 1.63, s 1.63, s 1.63, s 1.66, s 1.63, s
17/17′ 1.54, s 1.55, s 1.55, s 1.55, s 4.87, br s
4.86, br s 1.57, s
18/18′ 1.54, s 1.55, s 1.55, s 1.55, s 1.55, s 4.95, br s
4.88, br s
19/19′ 1.56, s 1.57, s 1.57, s 1.57, s 1.57, s 1.57, s
20/20′ 2.07, s 2.08, s 2.08, s 2.08, s 2.08, s 2.08, s
21-NH 7.99, t (5.8) 7.95, t (5.8) 7.98, t (5.8) 7.95, t (5.8) 8.00, t (5.8) 7.97, t (5.8)
22 3.12, dt (6.2, 5.8) 3.12, dt (6.2, 5.8) 3.12, dt (6.2, 5.8) 3.12, dt (6.2, 5.8) 3.12, dt (6.2, 5.8) 3.13, dt (6.2, 5.8)
23 1.82, m 1.82, m 1.83, m 1.83, m 1.83, m 1.82, m
24 3.24, m 3.25, m 3.25, m 3.25, m 3.27, m 3.26, m
26 3.27, m 3.27, m 3.27, m 3.27, m 3.29, m 3.27, m
27 1.68, m 1.66, m 1.67, m 1.67, m 1.69, m 1.68, m
28 1.64, m 1.66, m 1.67, m 1.67, m 1.69, m 1.68, m
29 3.07, m 3.27, m 3.27, m 3.27, m 3.29, m 3.30, m
31/32 2.99, s 3.00, s 3.01, s 3.01, s 3.00, s 3.00, s
33/34 2.77, s 3.00, s 3.01, s 3.01, s 3.00, s 3.00, s
35 3.25, m 3.25, m 3.25, m 3.35, m 3.33, m
36 1.82, m 1.83, m 1.83, m 2.00, m 1.97, m
37 3.12, dt (6.2, 5.8) 3.15, m 3.08, dt (6.3, 5.5) 2.87, m 2.86, m
38-NH 7.95, t (5.8) 8.22, t (5.8) 8.03, t (5.5) 8.11, 2H, br s 8.06, 2H, br s
39 8.05, s
40 1.82, s
14/10-OCOCH3 2.01, s 2.01, s
a

Prime numbers are for compound 3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Key 2D correlations for sinularamides B (2) and C (3).

Sinularamide C (3) with a molecular formula of C54H96N4O22+, with 10 degrees of unsaturation, was established from a doubly charged molecular ion in the HRESIMS ([M]2+ m/z 416.3767, calcd for C54H96N4O22+, 416.3761). The isotope distribution pattern for the molecular ion (adjacent peaks differ by 0.5 amu) indicated that it carried two positive charges. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra for 3 showed only half as many signals as predicted by the molecular formula; therefore, it was a symmetrical molecule. The NMR data (Tables 1 and 2) revealed characteristic signals that could be assigned to one geranylgeranylic acid subunit, but the remaining signals defined only half of an N,N-tetramethyl spermine moiety. Thus, it was apparent that sinularamide C (3) is comprised of an N,N-tetramethyl spermine unit, in which the two primary amines were each acylated with a geranylgeranylic acid diterpenoid chain. This assignment was supported by HMBC correlations from NH-21 (δH 7.95, t, J = 5.8 Hz) to C-1 (δc 166.4) and C-22 (δC 35.4) and from H-2 (δH 5.62, s) to C-1. An HMBC correlation observed between the spectroscopically equivalent C-27 and C-28 methylene groups (H2-27/C-28 and H2-28/C-27) supported the symmetrical, dimeric nature of 3, while diagnostic NOESY correlations confirmed an E configuration for the C-2/C-3 olefin (Figure 1).

Sinulamide D (4) was obtained as a colorless oil. The molecular formula C35H66N4O22+ with six degrees of unsaturation was determined by HRESIMS measurements of its doubly charged molecular ion ([M]2+ m/z 287.2585, calcd for C35H66N4O22+, 287.2587). The NMR data of 4 (Tables 1 and 2) were very similar to those recorded for 1; however, the 1H NMR spectrum of 4 contained an additional deshielded proton signal at δH 8.05 (1H, s, H-39) that correlated with a new carbonyl carbon at δC 161.5 (C-39) in the HSQC spectrum. HMBC correlations between H-39 and C-37 (δC 34.2), in conjunction with correlations from NH-38 (δH 8.22, t, J = 5.8 Hz) and H2-37 (δH 3.15, m) to C-39, revealed the presence of a formamide group attached to C-37 (Figure 2). The olefin configurations were assigned from 13C and NOESY data, which established the structure of sinularamide D (4) as the N-formyl derivative of sinularamide A (1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Key 2D correlations for sinularamides D–G (47).

Sinularamide E (5) was also a colorless oil with a molecular formula of C36H68N4O22+ that was determined by HRESIMS measurements ([M]2+ m/z 294.2663, calcd for C36H68N4O22+, 294.2665). The molecular formula of 5 represented an addition of CH2 to the formula of compound 4. The 1H and 13C NMR data recorded for 5 closely paralleled those of 4, except for the loss of the signals attributed to the formamide group and the appearance of an additional methyl at δH 1.82 (3H, s, H-40) in 5. HMBC correlations (Figure 2) between these methyl protons and a carbonyl carbon at δC 169.6 (C-39), along with correlations from both NH-38 (δH 8.03, t, J = 5.5 Hz) and H2-37 (δH 3.08, m) to C-39, confirmed the presence of a terminal acetamide group, which completed the structural assignment of sinularamide E (5).

Sinularamide F (6) was a colorless oil with a molecular formula C36H68N4O32+ determined by HRESIMS ([M]2+ m/z 302.2653, calcd for C36H68N4O32+, 302.2640) which had an additional oxygen relative to the molecular formula of sinularamide E (5). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra of 6 contained signals that closely matched the spermine portion of sinularamide A (1), but distinct changes in the diterpenoid moiety were apparent. The appearance of an additional methyl group at δH 2.01 (3H, s)/δC 21.3 and ester carbonyl δC 170.1 suggested the presence of an acetate group in 6. An oxymethine was revealed from the deshielded H-14 signal (δH 5.00, 1H, t, J = 6.7 Hz) and the chemical shift of C-14 (δC 76.4). HMBC correlations (Figure 2) from H-14 and the acetate methyl to the ester carbonyl established an O-acetyl group substituted at C-14. Broadened olefinic singlets at δH 4.87 (H-17a) and 4.86 (H-17b) correlated with the same sp2 carbon (112.8) in the HSQC spectrum and showed HMBC correlations with C-14 (δC 76.4), C-15 (δC 143.6), and C-16 (δC 18.4), indicative of a 1,1-disubstituted olefin involving carbons 15 and 17. The remaining NMR signals of sinularamide F (6), including NOESY correlations around the C-2/C-3, C-6/C-7, and C-10/C-11 olefins, were virtually identical to those of 1, which allowed assignment of the planar structure, but the absolute configuration at C-14 was not assigned.

Sinularamide G (7), had a molecular formula of C36H68N4O32+ that was isomeric with 6 ([M]2+ m/z 302.2648, calcd for C36H68N4O32+, 302.2640), and the 1H and 13C NMR data for 7 were also very similar to those of 6. The position of the acetyl group and the 1,1-disubstituted double bond (δC 111.0 and 147.2) in 7 were deduced by HMBC correlations (Figure 2) from H2-18 (δH 4.95, 4.88, each br s) to C-10 (δC 75.3) and C-12 (δC 31.6) and HMBC correlations from both H-10 (δH 5.03, 1H, t, J = 6.7 Hz) and the acetate methyl signal at δH 2.01 to the carbonyl carbon at δC 169.7. Diagnostic NOEs defined E configurations for the C-2/C-3 and C-6/C-7 double bonds. Thus, the structure of sinularamide G (7) was defined, but the absolute configuration at C-10 was not assigned.

Sinularamides A–G (17) were tested in vitro to assess their ability to inhibit Cbl-b dependent autoubiquitination.8 Compounds 17 exhibited moderate inhibitory activities with IC50 values that ranged from approximately 6.5 to 33 μM (Figure 3 and Supporting Information). Sinularamide C (3) was the most potent inhibitor with an IC50 of 6.5 μM. Cbl-b is a RING finger E3 ligase that regulates tyrosine kinase signaling, and it has been implicated in various oncogenic processes and as a regulator of immune cell function.3,4,17 Loss of the E3 function of Cbl-b results in activation of NK immune cells and T cells and renders them capable of rejecting tumors.46,18 Thus, compounds such as the sinularamides, which can inhibit Cbl-b activity in vitro, may provide a template to develop agents targeting Cbl-b that can be used to boost immune activation against cancer cells. However, the cationic nature of polyamines such as the sinularamides may limit their chemotherapeutic potential due to issues related to cellular permeability and nonspecific electrostatic interactions with other macromolecules.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Cbl-b inhibitory activity of sinularamide C (3).

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

General Experimental Procedures.

Optical rotations were measured on a Rudolph research analytical AUTOPOL IV spectropolarimeter. IR spectra were recorded with a Bruker ALPHA II FT-IR spectrometer. NMR spectra were obtained with a Bruker Avance III NMR spectrometer equipped with a 3 mm cryogenic probe and operated at 600 MHz for 1H and 150 MHz for 13C. NMR spectra were calibrated to the residual DMSO-d6 solvent signals at δH 2.50 and δC 39.5. The (+)-HRESIMS data were acquired on an Agilent Technology 6530 Accurate-mass Q-TOF LC/MS. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed using a Varian ProStar 215 solvent delivery module equipped with a Varian ProStar 340 UV–vis detector, operating under Star 6.41 chromatography workstation software.

Animal Material.

Specimens of the soft coral Sinularia sp. were collected in Palau, in November 1996, and kept frozen until extraction. The collection was carried out by the Coral Reef Research Foundation under contract with the Natural Products Branch, U.S. National Cancer Institute. A voucher specimen (voucher ID no. 0CDN4378) was deposited at the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, and a high-resolution in situ photo of the coral is available in the Supporting Information. The cream colored Sinularia sp. colonies were low and encrusting with numerous small knobs and ridges. Confirmation of the Sinularia sp. taxonomy was provided by octocoral specialists Andrea Quattrini and Catherine McFadden. The animal material (624.4 g, wet weight) was ground and processed using the standard NCI method for marine samples to provide 9.24 g of organic solvent (CH2Cl2–MeOH, 1:1) extract (NSC no. C016809).19

Isolation.

A portion of the crude extract (500.0 mg) was applied on SPE-diol cartridges (2 g) eluted with hexane–CH2Cl2 9:1 (v/v), CH2Cl2–EtOAc 20:1 (v/v), EtOAc, EtOAc–MeOH 5:1 (v/v), and MeOH in a stepwise manner. The active hydrophilic fraction (eluted by MeOH, 295.0 mg) was separated by semipreparative HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C18, 5 μ, 100 Å, 250 mm × 21.2 mm), using a linear gradient of MeOH–H2O 1:9 to 1:0 [v/v, containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)] as the mobile phase to yield 9 fractions (Frs. A–I); Fr. H was pure sinularamide A (1, 69.6 mg). The other fractions were further purified on the former HPLC column, with a linear gradient elution of CH3CN–H2O (v/v, containing 0.1% TFA). Fr .B (10.0 mg) was eluted with a linear gradient (4:6 to 9:1) to afford sinularamide E (5, 1.3 mg). Fr. D (14.4 mg) was eluted with a linear gradient (3:7 to 9:1) to obtain sinularamide F (6, 3.8 mg) and sinularamide G (7, 1.6 mg). Fr. F (17.2 mg) was eluted with a linear gradient (4:6 to 9:1) to yield sinularamide D (4, 3.8 mg). Fr. G (20.8 mg) and Fr. I (50.0 mg) were eluted with the same linear gradient (6:4 to 1:0) to yield sinularamide B (2, 11.9 mg) and sinularamide C (3, 1.2 mg), respectively.

Sinularamide B (2).

This compound is a colorless oil; IR (neat) νmax 3420, 1685, 1640, 1201, 1176, 1127, 830, 720 cm−1; 1H NMR data, see Table 1; 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 488.4594 [M]+ (calcd for C31H58N3O+, 488.4574).

Sinularamide C (3).

This compound is a colorless oil; IR (neat) νmax 3420, 1684, 1202, 1177, 1128, 668 cm−1; 1H NMR data, see Table 1; 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 416.3767 [M]2+ (calcd for C54H96N4O22+, 416.3761).

Sinularamide D (4).

This compound is a colorless oil; IR (neat) νmax 3420, 1671, 1201, 1176, 1127, 829, 801, 720 cm−1; 1H NMR data, see Table 1; 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 287.2585 [M]2+ (calcd for C35H66N4O22+, 287.2587).

Sinularamide E (5).

This compound is a colorless oil; IR (neat) νmax 3420, 1683, 1202, 1178, 1128, 831, 802, 720 cm−1; 1H NMR data, see Table 1; 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 294.2663 [M]2+ (calcd for C36H68N4O22+, 294.2665).

Sinularamide F (6).

This compound is a colorless oil; [α]D20+8.0(c0.06, MeOH); IR (neat) νmax 3421, 1685, 1202, 1128, 831, 802, 721 cm−1; 1H NMR data, see Table 1; 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 302.2653 [M]2+ (calcd for C36H68N4O32+, 302.2640).

Sinularamide G (7).

This compound is a colorless oil; [α]D20+8.9(c0.03, MeOH); IR (neat) νmax 3421, 1685, 1202, 1178, 1128, 831, 802, 720 cm−1; 1H NMR data, see Table 1; 13C NMR data, see Table 2; HRESIMS m/z 302.2648 [M]2+ (calcd for C36H68N4O32+, 302.2640).

Cbl-b Biochemical Assay.

Chromatography fractions and pure compounds were evaluated for activity in a Cbl-b bioassay, details of which have already been reported.8 In brief, dose response experiments with the purified compounds were carried out in Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.5) that contained 15 nM E1 protein (UBE1), 75 nM E2 protein (Ube2d2),20 112 nM Cbl-b protein (N1/2 Construct),21 75 nM biotinylated ubiquitin, 750 nM ubiquitin, 0.1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mg/mL bovine gelatin type B, 0.5 mM magnesium chloride, and 0.01% Triton X-100. Addition of ATP into the enzyme solution initiated the enzymatic reaction cascade. Initiated reactions were then transferred to plates that had been precoated overnight with 10 μg/mL polyubiquitin binding portion of Cbl-b (UBA)22 which allowed for the binding and specific enrichment of autopolyubiquitinated Cbl-b. After 1 h, the reactions were quenched, and the reaction plates were sealed and incubated overnight at room temperature. The following day, reaction plates were probed with avidin-conjugated horse radish peroxidase and washed three times; then, an avidin-HRP dependent fluorescent signal (indicating the presence of avidin-HRP/biotin-polyubiquitin complexes bound by the UBA coated plate) was detected (excitation 325 nm, emission 420 nm) using a Tecan Infinite M1000 plate reader.

Supplementary Material

Photograph of Sinularia sp. soft coral, 1H NMR spectra, 13C NMR spectra, HSQC spectra, HMBC spectra, COSY spectra, NOESY spectra, HRESIMS, IR spectra, ROESY spectra, and 1H (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) data for sinularamide A (1)
NMR data for sinularamide E
NMR data for sinularamide G
NMR data for sinularamide D
NMR data for sinularamide A
NMR data for sinularamide C
NMR data for sinularamide B
NMR data for sinularamide F

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Grateful acknowledgement goes to the Natural Products Support Group (NCI at Frederick) for extraction. We thank A. Wamiru for Cbl-b assay support and Masoumeh Dalilian, Molecular Targets Program, NCI and Basic Science Program, for sample preparation and submission. We also thank Andrea Quattrini and Catherine McFadden, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Suitland, MD, for taxonomic confirmation of the sample. This research was funded in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81903772. It was also supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research and with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supporting Information

Experimental procedures, additional figures, full spectroscopic data (PDF) as well as primary NMR data files for all new compounds The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00367.

NMR data for sinularamide A (ZIP)

NMR data for sinularamide B (ZIP)

NMR data for sinularamide C (ZIP)

NMR data for sinularamide D (ZIP)

NMR data for sinularamide E (ZIP)

NMR data for sinularamide F (ZIP)

NMR data for sinularamide G (ZIP)

Photograph of Sinularia sp. soft coral, 1H NMR spectra, 13C NMR spectra, HSQC spectra, HMBC spectra, COSY spectra, NOESY spectra, HRESIMS, IR spectra, ROESY spectra, and 1H (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) data for sinularamide A (1) (PDF)

Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.1c00367

Contributor Information

Wei Jiang, Marine Science & Technology Institute, College of Environmental Science & Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225127, People’s Republic of China; Molecular Targets Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States.

Dongdong Wang, Molecular Targets Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States.

Brice A. P. Wilson, Molecular Targets Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States.

Donna Voeller, Women’s Malignancy Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.

Heidi R. Bokesch, Molecular Targets Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States; Basic Science Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States

Emily A. Smith, Molecular Targets Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States; Basic Science Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States

Stanley Lipkowitz, Women’s Malignancy Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States.

Barry R. O’Keefe, Molecular Targets Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States; Natural Products Branch, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21701-1201, United States.

Kirk R. Gustafson, Molecular Targets Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, United States.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Loeser S; Loser K; Bijker MS; Rangachari M; van der Burg SH; Wada T; Beissert S; Melief CJM; Penninger JM J. Exp. Med 2007, 204, 879–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Speiser DE; Miranda R; Zakarian A; Bachmann MF; McKall-Faienza K; Odermatt B; Hanahan D; Zinkernagel RM; Ohashi PS J. Exp. Med 1997, 186, 645–653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Bachmaier K; Krawczyk C; Kozieradzki I; Kong Y-Y; Sasaki T; Oliveira-Dos-Santos A; Mariathasan S; Bouchard D; Wakeham A; Itie A; Le J; Ohashi PS; Sarosi L; Nishina H; Lipkowitz S; Penninger OM Nature 2000, 403, 211–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Loeser S; Loser K; Bijker MS; Rangachari M; van der Burg SH; Wada T; Beissert S; Melief CJM; Penninger JM J. Exp. Med 2007, 204, 879–891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Chiang JY; Jang IK; Hodes R; Gu HJ Clin. Invest 2007, 117, 1029–1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Paolino M; Choidas A; Wallner S; Pranjic B; Uribesalgo I; Loeser S; Jamieson AM; Langdon WY; Ikeda F; Fededa JP; Cronin SJ; Nitsch R; Schultz-Fademrecht C; Eickhoff J; Menninger S; Unger A; Torka R; Gruber T; Hinterleitner R; Baier G; Wolf D; Ullrich A; Klebl BM; Penninger JM Nature 2014, 507, 508–512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Liyasova MS; Ma K; Lipkowitz S Clin. Cancer Res 2015, 21, 1789–1794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Wilson BAP; Voeller D; Smith EA; Wamiru A; Goncharova EI; Liu G; Lipkowitz S; O’Keefe BR SLAS Discovery 2021, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Jiang C-S; Ru T; Huan X-J; Miao Z-H; Guo Y-W Steroids 2019, 149, 108425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Oguro A; Yanagida A; Fujieda Y; Amano R; Otsu M; Sakamoto T; Kawai G; Matsufuji SJ Biochem. 2016, 161, 197–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Shan P-H; Zhang Z-R; Bai D; Bian B; Tao Z; Xiao X New J. Chem 2019, 43, 407–412. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Yang L; Kan J; Wang X; Zhang Y; Tao Z; Liu Q; Wang F; Xiao X Front. Chem 2018, 6, 289/1–289/9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Jares-Erijman EA; Sakai R; Rinehart KL J. Org. Chem 1991, 56, 5712–5715. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Choi Y-H; Schmitz FJ J. Nat. Prod 1997, 60, 495–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Kazlauskas R; Murphy PT; Ravi BN; Sanders RL; Wells RJ Aust. J. Chem 1982, 35, 69–75. [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Sata NU; Sugano M; Matsunaga S; Fusetani N Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 719–722. [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Kales SC; Ryan PE; Nau MM; Lipkowitz S Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 4789–4794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Paolino M; Thien CBF; Gruber T; Hinterleitner R; Baier G; Langdon WY; Penninger JM J. Immunol 2011, 186 (4), 2138–2147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).McCloud TG Molecules 2010, 15, 4526–4563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Lorick KL; Jensen JP; Fang S; Ong AM; Hatakeyama S; Weissman AM Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 1999, 96, 11364–11369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Ettenberg SA; Magnifico A; Cuello M; Nau MM; Rubinstein YR; Yarden Y; Weissman AM; Lipkowitz SJ Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 27677–27684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Davies GC; Ettenberg SA; Coats AO; Mussante M; Ravichandran S; Collins J; Nau MM; Lipkowitz S Oncogene 2004, 23, 7104–7115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Photograph of Sinularia sp. soft coral, 1H NMR spectra, 13C NMR spectra, HSQC spectra, HMBC spectra, COSY spectra, NOESY spectra, HRESIMS, IR spectra, ROESY spectra, and 1H (600 MHz) and 13C NMR (125 MHz) data for sinularamide A (1)
NMR data for sinularamide E
NMR data for sinularamide G
NMR data for sinularamide D
NMR data for sinularamide A
NMR data for sinularamide C
NMR data for sinularamide B
NMR data for sinularamide F

RESOURCES