Skip to main content
Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine logoLink to Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
editorial
. 2022 Aug 2;99(4):603–606. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00671-1

Déjà vu All Over Again? Emergent Monkeypox, Delayed Responses, and Stigmatized Populations

Gregg S Gonsalves 1,2,, Kenneth Mayer 3,4,5, Chris Beyrer 6
PMCID: PMC9345008  PMID: 35916973

Over 40 years ago, in the summer of 1981, a new illness appeared in the American gay community, with cases quickly mounting in major cities. For the first few years, the etiologic agent of what was initially called gay-related immunodeficiency syndrome was unknown, its natural history obscure, its modes of transmission uncertain, though certainly including sexual contact. What quickly became known as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), was spreading more widely among what was known as the “4H Club” Haitians, hemophiliacs, homosexuals, and heroin users[1]. However, along with the virus itself, blame for this new outbreak was spreading as well. Haitians were castigated for bringing the virus into the country, while homosexuals and heroin users were the focus of stigma and discrimination, with some going as far to suggest that both should be tattooed to warn partners about their infection, while a quarantine initiative appeared on the California ballot [2, 3]. The “innocent victims” of AIDS were hemophiliacs, infants infected perinatally, and those infected through exposure in healthcare settings [4].

Unlike the emergence of the atypical pneumonia among men and women attending an American Legion convention in Philadelphia in 1976, which showed up on the cover of Time magazine that year and sent the federal government into overdrive to ascertain its cause, the federal response to AIDS was lackluster at best, with the President of the USA, not even mentioning the disease until 1985 and with members of his inner circle joking about the disease [57]. It was largely up to the LGBTQ+ community to build its own response to the epidemic, with AIDS service organizations providing care and support to those living with the disease and policy and activist organizations arising to combat the indifference and neglect of local, state, and federal leadership [8, 9]. Furthermore, though AIDS cases among heterosexuals were documented early in Africa and elsewhere outside of the global North in the early 1980s, it took almost two decades for any international mobilization at a scale to confront the enormity of the pandemic, and marginalized populations still struggle to get adequate resources [1013]. The early delays in the AIDS response allowed the virus to establish very high burdens globally, which have proven enormously difficult to address. As COVID-19 has taught us, the early period of epidemic spread is critical for pandemic control—and early weeks and months (or years) of inaction are terribly costly.

Almost a half century later, another summer and another virus has emerged in the USA and around the globe. However, the monkeypox outbreak of 2022, now documented among close to 6000 people—the majority men who have sex with men—in over 50 countries has striking similarities and stark differences with the HIV epidemic. Both monkeypox and HIV are zoonotic infections, jumping from animal hosts into human populations, which, after two and a half years with another zoonotic pandemic of SARS-CoV2, should demonstrate to us that rather than rare occurrences, these events are likely to be more and more common in this Anthropocene epoch, when any pandemic is less than a day’s plane ride away, so that our role in planetary health drives our own risks [14]. However, unlike HIV in 1980s, monkeypox is not an unknown pathogen and has been well-described since the 1970s in Central and West Africa [15, 16]. In fact, the current global outbreak likely originated in viral strains associated with an outbreak that started in Nigeria in 2017 [17]. Furthermore, the unusual clinical and epidemiological features of this current 2022 outbreak have been seen in the Nigerian context, described by clinicians and researchers there since 2018 [18, 19]. Monkeypox also differs starkly from HIV in its early days in that we have diagnostics, vaccines, and treatments for the disease [20].

HIV and monkeypox share similarities in the global and domestic response to these diseases. The Nigerian outbreak garnered little global attention and no urgency, no mobilization by the World Health Organization to use vaccines to control the outbreak there [21]. While there have been other sporadic outbreaks of monkeypox in the global North, there has been little interest in more than local containment, and new generations of vaccines and treatments, now being scaled up for the USA and other rich countries are unavailable in Africa, and test kits are in short supply [22, 23]. Even now with worldwide dissemination of the virus, the WHO, as of June 2022, had decided that monkeypox is not a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), which is yet another example of the WHO failing to lead, and is hard not to interpret as indifference to the well-being of Africans, as well as gay men and our communities [24, 25]. In outbreaks, time is of the essence and are early responses to monkeypox suggest another failure of containment looms.

At home in the USA, while many local, state, and federal leaders thankfully have been vocal about the need not to stigmatize monkeypox as a “gay disease,” they have been criticized for the bureaucratic delays and inaction [2628]. In particular, the reliance on the CDC’s own laboratory response network for testing rather than scaling up to allow commercial laboratories to diagnose the disease has been challenged as a barrier to case detection by researchers, public health experts, and advocates [28, 29]. Meanwhile, the lack of global attention to monkeypox has left public health officials scrambling for doses of a key vaccine, even in the USA, while policy options to address this shortage exist [30]. Finally, LGBTQ+ and AIDS organizations—well acquainted with dealing with infectious diseases among men who have sex with men—could and must do more as well, partnering with public health officials on active surveillance, vaccination campaigns in venues frequented by gay men [31].

The real risk now is that as monkeypox continues to spread in Africa, here in the USA and the rest of the world, it becomes an endemic infection among gay and bisexual men, spreading through their dense social and sexual networks, and through multiple forms of intimate and skin to skin exposures, adding to the burdens these communities are facing already from HIV and other infectious diseases. People can spread the virus to animals as well, including wild populations (mainly rodents), so there is the possibility of establishing endemic reservoirs outside Africa, arguably for the first time. And there is a risk that without containment among gay and bisexual men, the infection can spread in other settings in which the close physical contact monkeypox requires for transmission is common, from homeless shelters and prisons to gyms and sports clubs. [32, 33], similar to outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, detected early in this century. However, the risk to the “general” population should not be what spurs us to act: the lives of Africans and gay men around the world should not be the canaries in the coal mine for infectious diseases like HIV or monkeypox, only useful in their function as a sentinel for the rest of us to be on our guard. Prudent and compassionate public health policies require a more rapid, engaged, and coordinated approach.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References


Articles from Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine are provided here courtesy of New York Academy of Medicine

RESOURCES