Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2022 Jul 18;18(7):e1010305. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010305

Caspase-1-driven neutrophil pyroptosis and its role in host susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Karin Santoni 1, David Pericat 1, Leana Gorse 1, Julien Buyck 2, Miriam Pinilla 1, Laure Prouvensier 2, Salimata Bagayoko 1, Audrey Hessel 1, Stephen Adonai Leon-Icaza 1, Elisabeth Bellard 1, Serge Mazères 1, Emilie Doz-Deblauwe 3, Nathalie Winter 3, Christophe Paget 4, Jean-Philippe Girard 1, Christine T N Pham 5, Céline Cougoule 1, Renaud Poincloux 1, Mohamed Lamkanfi 6, Emma Lefrançais 1, Etienne Meunier 1,¤,‡,*, Rémi Planès 1,‡,*
Editor: Vincent T Lee7
PMCID: PMC9345480  PMID: 35849616

Abstract

Multiple regulated neutrophil cell death programs contribute to host defense against infections. However, despite expressing all necessary inflammasome components, neutrophils are thought to be generally defective in Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis. By screening different bacterial species, we found that several Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) strains trigger Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in human and murine neutrophils. Notably, deletion of Exotoxins U or S in P. aeruginosa enhanced neutrophil death to Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis, suggesting that these exotoxins interfere with this pathway. Mechanistically, P. aeruginosa Flagellin activates the NLRC4 inflammasome, which supports Caspase-1-driven interleukin (IL)-1β secretion and Gasdermin D (GSDMD)-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis. Furthermore, P. aeruginosa-induced GSDMD activation triggers Calcium-dependent and Peptidyl Arginine Deaminase-4-driven histone citrullination and translocation of neutrophil DNA into the cell cytosol without inducing extracellular Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Finally, we show that neutrophil Caspase-1 contributes to IL-1β production and susceptibility to pyroptosis-inducing P. aeruginosa strains in vivo. Overall, we demonstrate that neutrophils are not universally resistant for Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis.

Author summary

Neutrophils play an essential role against infections. Although multiple neutrophil death programs contribute to host defense against infections, neutrophils are thought to be defective in Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis. We screened several microbial species for the capacity to overcome neutrophil resistance to Caspase-1-driven pyroptosis, and show that the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa specifically engages the NLRC4 inflammasome to promote Caspase-1-dependent Gasdermin D activation and subsequent neutrophil pyroptosis. Furthermore, NLRC4 inflammasome-driven pyroptosis leads to histone citrullination, nuclear DNA decondensation and expansion into the host cell cytosol. However, Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) are not formed because DNA is kept in the intracellular space despite plasma membrane permeabilization and extracellular release of soluble and insoluble alarmins. Finally, in vivo P. aeruginosa infections highlight that Caspase-1-driven neutrophil pyroptosis is detrimental to the host upon P. aeruginosa infection. Altogether, our results demonstrate Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils as a process that contributes to host susceptibility to P. aeruginosa infection.

Introduction

Over the last 30 years, non-apoptotic forms of cell death have emerged as crucial processes driving inflammation, host defense against infections but also (auto) inflammatory pathologies [1]. NETosis is an antimicrobial and pro-inflammatory from of cell death in neutrophils that promotes the formation of extracellular web-like structures called Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) [2]. Although the importance of NETosis in host immunity to infections has been well established [25], NETosis dysregulation also associates to autoimmunity, host tissue damage, aberrant coagulation and thrombus formation, which all contribute to inflammatory pathologies such as sepsis and autoimmune lupus [613].

NETosis consists of sequential steps that start with nuclear envelope disintegration, DNA decondensation, cytosolic expansion of nuclear DNA and its subsequent expulsion through the plasma membrane [14]. Completion of DNA decondensation and expulsion requires various cellular effectors. Among them, neutrophil serine proteases (Neutrophil elastase, Cathepsin G, Proteinase 3) or Caspase-11 may cleave histones, which relaxes DNA tension [3, 13, 1517]. In addition, granulocyte-enriched Protein arginine deaminase 4 (PAD4) citrullinates histone-bound DNA to neutralize arginine positive charges and facilitate nuclear DNA relaxation and decondensation [4, 18, 19]. In a third step, decondensed DNA physically binds neutrophil cytoplasmic granule factors such as Neutrophil Elastase (NE), Cathepsin G (CathG), Proteinase 3 (Pr3) and Myeloperoxidase (MPO) proteins [3, 15, 18]. Finally, sub-cortical actin network disassembly promotes efficient DNA extrusion through the permeabilized plasma membrane [18, 20].

Depending on the initial trigger, various signaling pathways such as calcium fluxes [17, 18], necroptosis-associated MLKL phosphorylation [21], ROS-induced Neutrophil protease release [15] or endotoxin-activated Caspase-11 [3, 5, 22] have been shown to induce NETosis. ROS- and Caspase-11-dependent NETosis have been shown to share the requirement for cleavage of the pyroptosis executioner Gasdermin D (GSDMD) by neutrophil serine proteases and Caspase-11, respectively [3, 16]. Active GSDMD forms pores on PIP2-enriched domains of the plasma and nuclear membranes of neutrophils, which ensures both IL-1ß secretion [2326] and osmotic imbalance-induced DNA decondensation and expulsion [3, 16]. However, the link between ROS and Gasdermin-D-dependent NETosis requires more investigations as a recent study could show that a described GSDMD inhibitor, the LDC559, is actually a ROS inhibitor, but not a GSDMD inhibitor [27].

Intriguingly, despite inducing GSDMD cleavage, neutrophils were reported to resist induction of Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis upon NLRC4 inflammasome activation by Salmonella Typhimurium and Burkholderia thaïlandensis, or upon Nigericin/ATP-mediated NLRP3 inflammasome activation [3, 5, 28, 29]. However, recent studies indirectly challenged canonical pyroptosis impairment in neutrophils by showing that sterile activators, but also the SARS-CoV-2 virus, could also contribute to canonical NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent neutrophil death and subsequent NETosis [30, 31]. However, whether bacterial species exist that can induce neutrophil pyroptosis by canonical inflammasomes has remained an open question.

Lung infections by the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) can promote acute or chronic, life-threatening infections in immunocompromised and hospitalized patients [32]. P. aeruginosa strains express a Type-3 Secretion System (T3SS) that allows injecting a specific set of virulence factors into host target cells, including macrophages and neutrophils [33]. T3SS-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains classically segregate into two mutually exclusive clades. Those expressing the bi-cistronic ADP-rybosylating and GTPase Activating Protein (GAP) virulence factor ExoS, and those expressing the lytic phospholipase of the patatin-like family, ExoU [33]. Common to most of P. aeruginosa strains is the expression of two other toxins, ExoY and ExoT, whose functions in bacterial infection still remain unclear. All Exo toxins are injected by the T3SS into host target cells upon infections. Finally P. aeruginosa strains also use their T3SS to inject Flagellin but also some of the T3SS components (needle) into host target cells, which promotes activation of the NAIP-NLRC4 inflammasome and subsequent Caspase-1-driven and GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis of macrophages [3440]. Although numerous studies underlined that neutrophils are targeted by Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors, which could promote NETosis [12, 4143], the critical bacterial effector molecules and their host cell targets remain extensively debated. Intriguingly, defective expression of the enzyme NADPH oxidase (Nox2) sensitizes murine neutrophils to Caspase-1-driven neutrophil death upon infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa [44], which suggests that under certain conditions neutrophils might be prone to undergo Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis. Whether caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis also occurs in WT neutrophils, and what its putative molecular and immune significance might be remains unknown.

Here, we screened several bacterial species for their ability to bypass neutrophil resistance to canonical inflammasome-induced pyroptosis induction and found that the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa triggers Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in human and murine neutrophils. Notably, deletion of Exotoxins U or S in P. aeruginosa entirely rewires neutrophil death towards Caspase-1-driven pyroptosis, suggesting that these bacterial Exotoxins somehow suppress caspase-1-mediated neutrophil pyroptosis. Mechanistically, P. aeruginosa-induced pyroptosis requires the expression of a functional Type-3 Secretion System (T3SS) and Flagellin, but not the T3SS-derived toxins ExoS, ExoT, ExoY or ExoU. Consequently, P. aeruginosa selectively activates the neutrophil NLRC4 inflammasome, which ensures Caspase-1-driven Gasdermin D (GSDMD) cleavage and the induction of neutrophil pyroptosis. Furthermore, we show that GSDMD activation promotes Calcium-dependent Peptidyl Arginine Deaminase 4 (PAD4) activation. PAD4 goes on to citrullinates histones, which leads to DNA decondensation and translocation of decondensed neutrophil DNA in the host cell cytosol without it being expulsed from the cells into the extracellular environment. Finally, we show by intravital microscopy that neutrophil pyroptosis occurs in lungs of P. aeruginosa-infected MRP8-GFP mice, and that neutrophil-targeted deletion of caspase-1 (in MRP8-CreCasp1flox mice) reduces both IL-1β production and susceptibility to P. aeruginosa infection in vivo. Overall, our results highlight that Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis is a functional process in neutrophils that contributes to host susceptibility to P. aeruginosa infection in vivo.

Results

Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains variously trigger Caspase-1-dependent and -independent neutrophil lysis

To determine whether neutrophils may undergo pyroptosis upon bacterial infection, we infected WT and Caspase-1-/- (Casp1-/-) mouse Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) with various bacterial strains that are known to activate different inflammasomes in macrophages, such as Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium, strain SL1344), Shigella flexnerii (S. flexnerii, strain M90T), Legionella pneumophilia (L. pneumophilia, strain Philadelphia-1), Burkholderia thailandensis (B. thailandensis, strain E264), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, strain PAO1), Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes, strain EGD), Burkholderia cenocepaciae (B. cenocepaciae, strain LMG 16656), Francisella tularensis spp novicida (F. novicida, strain U112), Escherichia coli (E. Coli, strain K12), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, strain USA-300) and Vibrio cholera (V. cholera, strain El tor) (Fig 1A). In addition to tracking neutrophil lysis (LDH release), we measured IL-1β release as a hallmark of inflammasome activation. Given that neutrophils are short-lived cells that undergo spontaneous apoptosis over time, which can result in secondary necrosis and LDH release in vitro, we first determined a suitable time-frame in which neutrophils resist spontaneous lysis. Having determined that culture media of WT and Casp1-/- neutrophils lacked spontaneous LDH release during the first 4–5 hours (S1A Fig), we next performed infections within the first 3–4 hours in order to avoid confounding effects of spontaneous LDH release. With the notable exception of Staphylococcus aureus, we observed that all bacteria triggered Caspase-1-dependent IL-1β release in our experimental setups (Fig 1A), thus confirming Caspase-1 activation in neutrophils upon infection with various bacterial pathogens. In addition, despite most of the tested bacteria inducing significant neutrophil lysis, only LDH release by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1 strain) was partially dependent on Caspase-1 (further referred to as pyroptosis) (Fig 1A). Furthermore, we confirmed that infection of human blood neutrophils with two different Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains (PAO1 and CHA) also triggered a Caspase-1-dependent, yet Caspase-4/5, -3/7 and -8-independent, IL-1ß release and neutrophil lysis (Fig 1B). These results demonstrate that various bacteria can trigger neutrophil lysis in a Caspase-1-independent manner, and that Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 strain specifically promotes neutrophil lysis through a mechanism that is partially Caspase-1-dependent.

Fig 1. Various Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains trigger Caspase-1-dependent and -independent neutrophil lysis.

Fig 1

A. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or Casp1-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with various bacteria at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. **p ≤ 0.01 ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. B. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in human blood neutrophils infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains PAO1 or CHA (MOI 5) in presence/absence of various Caspase inhibitors, Z-VAD (pan Caspase, 20μM), Z-YVAD (Casp1 inhibitor, 40μM), Z-DEVD (Casp3 inhibitor, 40μM), Z-IETD (Casp8 inhibitor, 40μM) or Z-LEVD (Casp4/5 inhibitor, 40μM). **p ≤ 0.01 ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show values from three independent experiments with one different donor each time. C, D. Measure of plasma membrane permeabilization and associated fluorescent microscopy images over time using SYTOX Green incorporation in WT or Casp1-/- BMNs infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 or various isogenic mutants lacking Flagellin (FliC, PAO1ΔFliC) or T3SS-derived toxins ExoS, ExoY, ExoT (PAO1ΔExoS, PAO1ΔExoY, PAO1ΔExoT). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. Hoechst (Blue, DNA), Sytox Green (DNA from neutrophils with permeabilized membranes, Green). Scale Bar: 50μm. E. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT, Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for the indicated times with PAO1 or its isogenic mutant PAO1ΔExoS at an MOI of 10. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. F. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT, Casp1-/-, Casp11-/-, Casp1-/-Casp11-/- and GsdmD-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PP34 strain or its isogenic mutant PP34ΔExoU at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. G. Overview of the importance of Caspase-1 at driving neutrophil pyroptosis in response to various Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

P. aeruginosa T3SS-mediated injection of Flagellin and toxins (ExoS, U, T, Y) play a major role in its virulence. To determine the role of these virulence factors in P. aeruginosa-induced neutrophil pyroptosis, we infected murine BMNs with WT P. aeruginosa PAO1 or mutant strains that are deficient in expression of individual toxins (PAO1ΔExoS, PAO1ΔExoT, PAO1ΔExoY); deficient for the expression of Flagellin (PAO1ΔFliC); or for the T3SS (PAO1ΔExsA) (Figs 1C and S1B). We parallelly measured the ability of WT and Casp1-/- neutrophils infected with these strains to undergo cell lysis (LDH release), to promote IL1β release, and to exhibit plasma membrane permeabilization (SYTOX Green incorporation) (Figs 1C and S1B). Our results show that P. aeruginosa strains lacking expression of T3SS or Flagellin were unable to promote robust Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil lysis, IL-1β release and plasma membrane permeabilization, suggesting that T3SS and Flagellin are major effectors of Caspase-1-driven neutrophil death (Figs S1B and 1C). Flagellin deficiency modifies the physical recognition and phagocytosis of P. aeruginosa by macrophages and neutrophils [45, 46] (S1C Fig), which could indirectly alter the amount of Flagellin injected into host target cells. To ensure similar phagocytosis/recognition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains by neutrophils, we genetically invalidated the expression of Flagellin motors (namely MotABCD) in a WT PAO1 and Flagellin-deficient (PAO1ΔFliC) genetic background. Both PAO1ΔMotABCD and PAO1ΔMotABCD/ΔFliC showed similar neutrophil uptake after 45 minutes of infection (S1C Fig), which allowed evaluating the direct importance of Flagellin in P. aeruginosa-driven Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis. Kinetic analysis of neutrophil lysis (LDH release) and IL-1β production in WT and Casp1-/- neutrophils showed that PAO1ΔMotABCD, but not PAO1ΔMotABCD/ΔFliC, induced Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil lysis and IL-1β release over time (S1D Fig), suggesting that Flagellin plays a major role in P. aeruginosa-induced neutrophil pyroptosis.

To the contrary, deletion of Exo-Y or Exo-T in P. aeruginosa PAO1 did not significantly influence neutrophil lysis, IL-1β release or plasma membrane permeabilization (Fig 1C and 1D, and S1B). However, infection of neutrophils with P. aeruginosa PAO1 deficient for ExoS triggered significantly increased lysis, membrane permabilization and IL-1β release (Fig 1C and 1D, and S1B). In addition, PAO1ΔExoS-induced neutrophil lysis was strongly reduced in Caspase-1-deficient neutrophils, suggesting that ExoS expression suppresses Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil death (Fig 1C and 1D, and S1B).

Caspase-1 cleavage of the pyroptosis executioner Gasdermin D (GSDMD) is the central effector mechanism of canonical inflammasome-induced pyroptosis in macrophages. Kinetic measurements confirmed that both Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- neutrophils exhibited reduced LDH and IL-1β release upon P. aeruginosa infection (Fig 1E). Consistent with our earlier observations (Fig 1C and 1D, and S1B), neutrophil lysis and IL-1β release by the PAO1ΔExoS mutant (and to a lower extent also PAO1-induced responses) were strongly dependent on CASP1 and GSDMD expression (Fig 1E).

P. aeruginosa strains PAO1 and CHA belong to the 70% of the P. aeruginosa strains that express the Exotoxin S (ExoS). As 30% of P. aeruginosa strains do not express the Exotoxin S (ExoS) but instead are characterized as expressing the extremely lytic phospholipase toxin ExoU, we expanded our analysis to neutrophils infected with a strain expressing a catalytically inactive mutant of ExoU (PP34ExoUS142A). In addition, we examined the response of neutrophils to a P. aeruginosa strain that naturally expresses ExoU (PP34 strain) or a mutant thereof that is genetically deficient for ExoU (PP34ΔExoU). These experiments showed that the P. aeruginosa PP34 strain induces neutrophil lysis, yet in a Caspase-1- and Gasdermin D-independent manner (Figs 1F and S1E). However, both human and murine neutrophils infected with PP34ΔExoU or PP34ExoUS142A showed robust Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil lysis, plasma membrane permeabilization and IL-1β release (Figs 1F, S1E and S1F). These results suggest that Caspase-1 and GSDMD-dependent pyroptosis is masked or suppressed by ExoU activity in the P. aeruginosa PP34 strain.

Altogether, our results show the unexpected ability of Caspase-1 to promote GSDMD-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis upon Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (Fig 1G).

NLRC4 drives P. aeruginosa-induced neutrophil pyroptosis

Next, we investigated the upstream molecular pathways by which P. aeruginosa promoted Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis. To address this specific question, we used the most potent pyroptotic strains of P. aeruginosa, namely PAO1ΔExoS, PP34ΔExoU or PP34 ExoUS142A (further referred to as “pyroptotic strains” for clarity) (Fig 1G). We infected WT murine neutrophils or neutrophils from mice lacking expression of various inflammasome sensors, namely Casp1-/-, Casp11-/-, Casp1-/-Casp11-/-, Nlrp3-/-, AIM2-/—, Nlrc4-/- and ASC-/- (S2A Fig). Among the different tested neutrophil genotypes, significant resistance to pyroptotic cell lysis (LDH release) was only observed in Casp1-/-, Casp1-/-Casp11-/-, Nlrc4-/- and ASC-/- BMNs upon infection with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strains PAO1ΔExoS and PP34ΔExoU (S2A Fig). Contrastingly, Casp11-/-, Nlrp3-/- and AIM2-/- neutrophils exhibited similar lysis levels (LDH release) as observed in WT BMNs (S2A Fig). This suggests that NLRC4—but not NLRP3, Caspase-11 or AIM2—efficiently promotes neutrophil pyroptosis upon infection with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strains (S2A Fig). The role of NLRC4 in P. aeruginosa-induced neutrophil cell death is confined to Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis because infection of WT and Nlrc4-/- BMNs with P. aeruginosa strains that trigger Caspase-1-independent neutrophil lysis (PP34) resulted in similar LDH release levels, akin to our earlier results in Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- neutrophils (Figs 1F and 2A). In contrast, infection of WT and Nlrc4-/- BMNs with P. aeruginosa strains of which neutrophil cell lysis is partially Caspase-1-dependent (PAO1 and CHA strains) also showed a partial involvement of NLRC4 in controlling neutrophil lysis (Fig 2A). Importantly, IL-1β release was entirely dependent on NLRC4 upon infection with any of these different Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, whereas the pyroptotic strains PAO1ΔExoS, CHAΔExoS and PP34ΔExoU triggered neutrophil lysis and IL-1β release that was fully NLRC4-dependent (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. P. aeruginosa infection engages a canonical NLRC4-Caspase-1-Gasdermin D-dependent pyroptosis axis in neutrophils.

Fig 2

A. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or Nlrc4-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, CHA and PP34 strains and their isogenic mutants lacking T3SS-derived toxins ExoS, ExoY, ExoT or ExoU) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 (PAO1 and CHA strains) and 2 (PP34 strains). **p ≤ 0.01 ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. B. Immunoblotting of GAPDH, pro-forms of Caspase-1 (p45) and Gasdermin-D (p55), processed Caspase-1 (p20) and Gasdermin D (p30), in WT, Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- in cell lysates and cell supernatants (SNs) of BMNs infected for 3 hours with PAO1 or its isogenic mutants lacking T3SS expression (PAO1ΔExsA) or ExoS (PAO1ΔExoS) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. Immunoblots show lysates and supernatants from one experiment performed three times. C. Immunoblotting of Myeloperoxidase (MPO), pro-forms of Caspase-1 (p45) and Gasdermin-D (p55), processed Caspase-1 (p20) and Gasdermin D (p30), in WT, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa strain PP34 or its isogenic mutant lacking ExoU activity (PP34ExoUS142A) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2. Immunoblots show combined lysates and supernatants from one experiment performed three times. D. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) in WT and Nlrc4-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa mutant strains PP34ΔExoU or PP34ΔExoU/ΔFliC at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 and Imagestream experiments and quantifications of in vivo formation of ASC specks in bronchoalveolar (BALs) neutrophils from ASC-Citrine mice intranasally infected with 1.105 PP34ΔExoU or PP34ΔExoU/ΔFliC for 6 hours. The gating strategy used to evaluate inflammasome activation in neutrophils was performed as follow: (i) a gate was set on cells in focus [Cells in Focus] and (ii) a sub-gate was created on single cells [Single Cells]. Then we gated first on (iii) LY6G+ Neutrophils [LY6G+] and second on (iv) ASC-citrine+ and Hoechst+ cells [Hoechst+/ASC-Citrine+] within LY6G+ population. (v) To distinguish cells with active (ASC-speck) versus inactive inflammasome (Diffuse ASC), we plotted the Intensity with the area of ASC-citrine. This strategy allows to distinguish cells with active inflammasome that were visualized and quantified. For Imagestream experiments ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show one experiment representative of two independent experiments. For neutrophil in vitro experiments, ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. E. Overview of the importance of the NLRC4 inflammasome at driving neutrophil pyroptosis in response to various Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

Further analysis of Caspase-1 (p20) and GSDMD (p30) processing in response to various P. aeruginosa strains showed that the pyroptotic strains PAO1ΔExoS, PP34 ExoUS142A and PP34ΔExoU as well as partially Caspase-1-dependent PAO1 strain triggered robust neutrophil Caspase-1 and GSDMD processing, a process that required NLRC4 expression (Fig 2B and 2C). As expected, a PAO1 mutant strain lacking the T3SS regulator ExsA (PAO1ΔExsA) failed to induce robust Caspase-1 and GSDMD processing (Fig 2B). Finally, the PP34 strain, which promotes NLRC4- and Caspase-1-independent neutrophil lysis, also failed to trigger efficient cleavage of Caspase-1 and GSDMD, suggesting that PP34-induced neutrophil lysis is inflammasome-independent (Fig 2C). These results suggest that NLRC4 drives Caspase-1 and GSDMD cleavage in response to various P. aeruginosa strains that are capable of inducing neutrophil pyroptosis, namely PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS, CHA, CHAΔExoS, PP34ΔExoU and PP34 ExoUS142A, but not in response to the PP34 strain that induces inflammasome-independent neutrophil lysis.

Based on this information, we sought to determine whether P. aeruginosa infection also induced neutrophil NLRC4 inflammasome activation in vivo. To this end, we infected ASC-Citrine mice with low doses (1.105 CFUs) of P. aeruginosa strains that specifically triggered NLRC4-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis, namely PP34ΔExoU. As control, we included its isogenic mutant PP34ΔExoU/ΔFliC that is deficient in Flagellin expression and hence unable to trigger NLRC4-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis in vitro (Figs 2D and S2B). ImageStreamX analysis of neutrophils presenting an active ASC supramolecular speck (ASC speck+/LY6G+ neutrophils) showed that PP34ΔExoU infection triggered inflammasome activation in neutrophils, and that the amount of ASC speck+ neutrophils was reduced when mice where infected with Flagellin-deficient PP34ΔExoU/ΔFliC mutant bacteria (Figs 2D and S2B). Altogether, these results show that the NLRC4/CASP1/GSDMD axis is fully functional to promote neutrophil pyroptosis in response to several P. aeruginosa strains, namely PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS, CHA, CHAΔExoS, PP34ΔExoU or PP34 ExoUS142A (Fig 2E).

P. aeruginosa-induced inflammasome activation induces neutrophil DNA decondensation

As multiple cell death pathways such as Caspase-11-induced pyroptosis, MLKL-driven necroptosis, Mitogen- and Calcium-induced NETosis, have been linked to a direct or secondary induction of neutrophil DNA decondensation and release, a hallmark of NETosis, we next sought to determine whether P. aeruginosa-induced neutrophil inflammasome activation could also lead to DNA decondensation and expulsion. We infected WT, Casp1-/- or GsdmD-/- murine BMNs with the pyroptotic P. aeruginosa strains PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS, PP34ExoUS142A, or with the PP34 strain that triggers Caspase-1-independent neutrophil lysis (Figs 1 and 2). We specifically monitored the presence of DNA Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Fig 3A). PP34, and to a lower extend PAO1, induced NETs in WT, Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- neutrophils (Fig 3A). However, we observed that the fully pyroptotic strains PAO1ΔExoS and PP34ExoUS142A failed to induce NETs (Fig 3A), which suggests that Caspase-1-induced neutrophil pyroptosis does not promote NETosis.

Fig 3. NLRC4 inflammasome signaling in neutrophils promotes both pyroptotis and DNA decondensation but not DNA expulsion.

Fig 3

A. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations and quantifications of pyroptosis in WT, Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- BMNs 3 hours after infection with P. aeruginosa strains PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS, PP34 and PP34ExoUS142A at an MOI of 10 (PAO1 strains) and 2 (PP34 strains). Images are representative of one experiment performed 3 times. Scale bars are directly indicated in the figure. For quantifications, the percentage of cells exhibiting extracellular DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for extracellular DNA over the total of cells. 6–10 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. B. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of WT, Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) and harboring ASC complexes, decondensed DNA and nuclear membrane (LaminB1). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; LaminB1 is in red (anti LaminB1); ASC is in Green (anti-ASC); plasma membrane is in grey (WGA staining). Scale bar 10μm. Images are representative of one experiment performed three times. For quantifications, the percentage of cells with ASC complexes and nuclear DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for ASC speckles and nuclear DNA. 6–10 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. C. Representative time lapse fluorescence microscopy images and quantifications of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with the NETotic strain PP34 or the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) for 9 hours (540 minutes). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in yellow (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining); plasma membrane permeabilization is stained in red (cell impermanent DNA dye Propidium Iodide, PI). Images are representative of one movie out of three independent movies. For quantifications, the percentage of cells harboring decondensed DNA and/or extracellular decondensed DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells with decondensed DNA (area surface) or cells with decondensed DNA crossing WGA staining (DNA area surface outside from plasma membrane) over the total amount of cells. At least 6 fields containing each 20–30 cells were quantified. Scale bar 10μm. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction.

Rather, immunofluorescence experiments of WT, Casp1-/- and GsdmD-/- neutrophils infected with the fully pyroptotic P. aeruginosa strain PP34ExoUS142A showed efficient DNA decondensation as well as exit from the nuclear envelope (Lamin-B1 staining) but little or no extracellular DNA release from BMNs exhibiting an active inflammasome complex (referred as ASC specks, ASC+), a process also observed in primary human blood neutrophils (Fig 3A and 3B, and S3A). Further experiments using time lapse fluorescent microscopy on ASC-Citrine neutrophils infected with the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A or the NETosis-inducing strain PP34 showed that both bacterial strains triggered efficient neutrophil DNA decondensation (Fig 3C and S1 and S2 Movies). However, pyroptotic neutrophils uniquely failed to complete DNA release out from the plasma membrane (stained with WGA) (Fig 3C). These observations were also confirmed using 3D reconstruction of confocal fluorescent images (S3 and S4 Movies). Specifically, analyzing DNA decondensation induced by the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A or the NETotic strain PP34 in ASC-Citrine neutrophils, we observed that in ASC specks+ cells, DNA efficiently decondensed and filled the entire intracellular space, but did not cross the plasma membrane (stained with WGA) (Fig 3C and S3 and S4 Movies). Given that NETosis features histone-bound DNA complexes outside from neutrophils, we reasoned that during pyroptosis, neutrophils might keep histone-bound DNA trapped intracellularly. Consistently, immunoblotting of histones in various neutrophil fractions (soluble, insoluble and supernatant) showed that PP34-induced NETosis efficiently promoted histone release in the extracellular medium (S3B Fig). However, the pyroptotic PP34ExoUS142A strain failed to induce extracellular histone release, although it efficiently promoted the release of intracellular soluble and insoluble components such as GAPDH, the nuclear membrane structural component Lamin B1, the nuclear alarmin HMGB1 or NLRC4 in the extracellular environment (S3B Fig). Importantly, this process required NLRC4 expression (S3B Fig). This suggests that NLRC4-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis specifically promotes DNA decondensation and release from the nuclear membrane while retaining histone-bound DNA intracellularly despite soluble and insoluble factors being released in the extracellular environment (S3C Fig).

Inflammasome-induced neutrophil DNA decondensation is driven by Calcium-activated PAD4 downstream of GSDMD

Next, we wondered about the mechanisms by which inflammasome signaling promotes DNA decondensation and cytosolic redistribution. Two mechanisms that promote DNA decondensation in neutrophils have been reported. First, Neutrophil Serine proteases Neutrophil Elastase (NE), Cathepsin G (CatG) and Proteinase 3 (Pr3) can cleave Histones, which will favor DNA decondensation [15]. Second, upon Calcium release, the enzyme PAD4 promotes Histone Citrullination and subsequent DNA decondensation in neutrophils [4, 6, 7, 47].

We first explored if Caspase-1-induced neutrophil DNA delobulation and release required Neutrophil Serine proteases. We examined the extent of DNA decondensation in WT neutrophils and neutrophils lacking the three proteases NE, CatG and Pr3 (NE-/-CatG-/-Pr3-/-) upon infection with the fully pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (Fig 4A). We observed that WT and NE-/-CatG-/-Pr3-/- neutrophils exhibited similar DNA decondensation levels (Fig 4A), but also that NE-/-CatG-/-Pr3-/- murine neutrophils underwent a similar degree of pyroptosis and released similar amounts of IL-1β compared to their WT counterparts (Fig 4B). This suggested that neutrophil Serine proteases do not play a major role in inflammasome-induced neutrophil DNA delobulation and decondensation.

Fig 4. Canonical inflammasome activation-induced DNA decondensation requires PAD4-dependent Histone Citrullination and occurs independently of cell shrinkage.

Fig 4

A. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of WT and NE-/-CatG-/-Pr3-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) and harboring decondensed DNA and plasma membrane (WGA). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; plasma membrane is in grey (WGA staining). For quantifications, the percentage of cells with nuclear DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for decondensed DNA on nuclear DNA. 6 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Scale bar 30μm. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. B. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT, NE-/-CatG-/-Pr3-/- and GsdmD-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. C. Confocal microscopy observations of WT, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) and harboring Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit), decondensed DNA (Hoechst) and plasma membrane (WGA). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Citrullinated Histone-3 is in red (anti H3-Cit); plasma membrane is in grey (WGA staining). Scale bar 20μm. Images are representative of one experiment performed three times with at least 150 neutrophils observed/ experiment. D. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of the percentage of cells harboring ASC complexes, H3Citrullination and nuclear/decondensed DNA in WT-ASC-Citrine+ BMNs infected for 3 hours with PP34ExoUS142A in presence/absence of the PAD4 inhibitor GSK484 (10μM). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Histone-3 Citrullination is in red (Anti-H3Cit staining); plasma membrane is in grey (WGA staining). Scale bar 10μm. For quantifications, the percentage of cells with ASC complexes, nuclear DNA or positives for H3Cit (H3-Cit+) was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for ASC speckles, nuclear DNA or H3Cit. At least 10 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. E. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of WT and Pad4-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10) and harboring ASC complexes, Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit), decondensed DNA and plasma membrane (WGA). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Histone-3 Citrullination is in red (Anti-H3Cit staining); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining), ASC is in grey (Anti-ASC). Scale bar 10μm. For quantifications, the percentage of cells with ASC complexes, nuclear DNA or positives for H3Cit (H3-Cit+) was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for ASC speckles, nuclear DNA or H3Cit. At least 10 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. F. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and bacterial killing in WT, Pad4-/- and Nlrc4-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains PP34 (MOI 2), PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2), PAO1 (MOI 10) or PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. LDH graph shows combined values from three independent experiments and CFU graph is from one experiment representative of three independent experiments. G. Overview of the different steps induced in neutrophils during NLRC4 inflammasome activation by various Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

Next, we analyzed the importance of histone citrullination as a potential effector mechanism of inflammasome-driven DNA decondensation in neutrophils. Microscopy analysis of histone citrullination in WT, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- showed that the fully pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A induced robust histone3-citrullination in an NLRC4- and GSDMD-dependent manner (Fig 4C). Similar experiments performed in human blood neutrophils highlighted that both pyroptotic strains PP34ExoUS142A and PAO1ΔExoS also promoted histone citrullination, a process that was inhibited by the use of the Caspase-1 inhibitor Z-YVAD (S4A Fig). In order to further validate these observations, we performed immunoblotting against citrullinated histones in WT, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- neutrophils infected with the pyroptotic P. aeruginosa strains PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS, PP34ΔExoU or with the NETotic strain PP34. As control, we used Ionomycin, a known inducer of histone citrullination-driven NETosis. We observed that Ionomycin triggered NLRC4-independent histone citrullination in neutrophils (S4B Fig). To the contrary, pyroptotic strains of P. aeruginosa PAO1ΔExoS, PP34ΔExoU and to a lower extend PAO1 all triggered NLRC4- and GSDMD-dependent histone citrullination (S4B Fig). We noticed that in Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- neutrophils, citrullination was not fully abrogated, suggesting that minor alternative pathways might also promote histone citrullination upon infection with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strains (S4B Fig).

As PAD4 is an enzyme that promotes histone citrullination and subsequent DNA decondensation in various contexts, we next tested the importance of PAD4 in inflammasome-driving DNA decondensation in neutrophils. Infection of ASC-Citrine BMNs with the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A revealed that DNA decondensation required PAD4 as pharmacological inhibition (GSK484) of PAD4 abrogated both histone citrullination as well as nuclear DNA release (Fig 4D). In addition, measure of ASC specks (ASC+) in ASC-Citrine BMNs highlighted that PAD4 inhibition did not inhibit inflammasome assembly upon PP34ExoUS142A infection (Fig 4D). Similarly, infection of WT or Pad4-/- neutrophils with the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A showed a strong defect in histone citrullination and DNA decondensation in Pad4-/- neutrophils (Fig 4E). As observed previously, the induction of ASC specks was not modified in Pad4-/- neutrophils, suggesting that PAD4 drives histone citrullination and DNA decondensation but not inflammasome assembly in response to PP34ExoUS142A (Fig 4E). Further infections of WT, Pad4-/- and Nlrc4-/- neutrophils with pyroptotic strains PP34ExoUS142A and PAO1ΔExoS also showed that WT and Pad4-/- neutrophils underwent a similar degree of NLRC4-dependent pyroptosis, hence excluding that PAD4 might directly modulate assembly of the NLRC4 inflammasome upon P. aeruginosa infection (Fig 4F).

PAD4 activation has been described to require Calcium [47]. As GSDMD pores can also promote Calcium signaling, we wondered about the importance of Calcium at regulating inflammasome-driven PAD4-dependent histone citrullination in neutrophils. We infected WT and GsdmD-/- neutrophils with the pyroptotic strains PP34ExoUS142A and PAO1ΔExoS in presence/absence of the extracellular Calcium chelator EGTA and measured neutrophil lysis, IL-1β release as well as histone citrullination and DNA decondensation (S4C and S4D Fig). Microscopy observations showed that infection of neutrophils with the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A efficiently induced histone citrullination and DNA decondensation in WT neutrophils, but not in GsdmD-/- neutrophils (S4C Fig). This was associated with a strong defect in GsdmD-/- neutrophils to undergo pyroptosis and to release IL-1β (S4D Fig). Importantly, extracellular Calcium chelation with EGTA strongly impaired both histone citrullination and DNA decondensation upon PP34ExoUS142A infection, suggesting a strong role for extracellular Calcium in driving PAD4 activation upon inflammasome activation in neutrophils (S4C and S4D Fig). Strikingly, neutrophil pyroptosis and IL-1β release were not modified by the use of EGTA upon infection with PP34ExoUS142A or PAO1ΔExoS pyroptotic strains, suggesting that Calcium fluxes are important players of histone citrullination and DNA decondensation downstream of inflammasome activation in neutrophils (S4C and S4D Fig).

As inflammasome signaling in neutrophils triggers Calcium and PAD4-dependent histone citrullination and DNA decondensation, we next aimed to determine if neutrophil shrinkage, the final step of cell lysis, could regulate Calcium- and PAD4-driven DNA decondensation. To this end, we made use of the osmoprotectant Glycine [48], which is able to protect cell integrity and to inhibit LDH release without affecting inflammasome-driven IL-1β release (S4E and S4F Fig). Infection of WT and GsdmD-/- neutrophils with PP34ExoUS142A showed that Glycine did not modify neutrophil histone citrullination and DNA decondensation upon PP34ExoUS142A infection, although it efficiently protected cells from LDH release without affecting IL-1β release (S4E and S4F Fig). Again, GsdmD-/- neutrophils showed strong resistance to DNA decondensation upon PP34ExoUS142A infection (S4E and S4F Fig). This suggests that Calcium/PAD4-induced efficient DNA decondensation occurs in a Gasdermin-D-dependent manner, but is uncoupled from complete neutrophil lysis upon inflammasome activation.

Finally, to determine if P. aeruginosa-induced neutrophil pyroptosis and PAD4-dependent DNA decondensation play a microbicidal function, we infected WT, Pad4-/- and Nlrc4-/- BMNs with various Pseudomonas strains and evaluated their cell-autonomous immune capacities. Nlrc4-/- BMNs had improved ability to restrict PAO1, PP34ExoUS142A and PAO1ΔExoS infection than WT and Pad4-/- neutrophils (Fig 4G), suggesting that neutrophil pyroptosis more than PAD4-driven DNA decondensation promotes neutrophil failure to restrict PAO1, PP34ExoUS142A and PAO1ΔExoS. Altogether, our results describe a novel pathway wherein activation of the neutrophil NLRC4 inflammasome triggers the generation of Calcium/PAD4-dependent intracellular, but not extracellular, DNA structures in a GSDMD-dependent, yet cell shrinkage-independent, manner (Fig 4H).

Neutrophil Caspase-1 contributes in vivo to IL-1β production and to mouse susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection

Our results showed that various P. aeruginosa strains trigger a Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis in vitro (Figs 14). Based on these findings, we next sought to understand the specific role of neutrophil Caspase-1 in P. aeruginosa infected animals. First, to determine if neutrophils undergo Caspase-1-dependent DNA decondensation without induction of extracellular NET formation in vivo, we infected MRP8-GFP+ (granulocytes, including neutrophils express GFP) mice and monitored for the granulocyte death features using intravital microscopy (Fig 5A). Although necrotic granulocytes exhibited NETotic features (e.g. extracellular DNA) upon exposure to the NETotic strain PP34, infection with the pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A led to the appearance of swelled-round necrotic granulocytes that exhibited intracellular decondensed DNA, similarly to what we observed in vitro (Fig 5A and S5 Movie). This suggests that upon lung infection, Caspase-1-induced neutrophil pyroptosis is well occurring and displays morphological and immunological characteristics that are distinct to NETs.

Fig 5. Neutrophil Caspase-1 contributes to IL-1β production and to Pseudomonas aeruginosa spread in mice.

Fig 5

A. Intravital microscopy visualization of granulocyte death in MRP8-GFP+ mice infected with 2.5.105 CFUs of PP34 (NETosis-inducing strain) or PP34ExoUS142A (pyroptotic strain) in presence of SYTOX Blue for 10 hours. Granulocyte death was observed in infected lungs by the appearance of SYTOX blue fluorescence. Pseudo colors represent vessels (gray, mTG); Granulocytes (Green, MRP8-GFP+); Dead cells (Purple, SYTOX blue). Scale bar: 20μm. Data show one experiment representative of 5 independent mice. B. Survival of MRP8Cre- Casp1flox and MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice intranasally infected with 5.105 CFUs of PP34 (NETotic strain) or PP34ExoUS142A (pyroptotic strain) for 24 hours (n = 6 animals per condition). Graphs represent one experiment (6 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. Log-rank Cox-Mantel test was used for survival comparisons. ***p ≤ 0.001. NS; Not significant. C. Bronchoalveolar (BAL) and lung bacterial loads (colony forming units, CFUs) in MRP8Cre- Casp1flox and MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice intranasally infected with 2.5.105 CFUs of PP34 (NETotic strain) or PP34ExoUS142A (pyroptotic strain) for 24 hours. Graphs represent one experiment (7 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. D. Determination of IL-1β levels in Bronchoalveolar Fluids (BALFs) MRP8Cre- Casp1flox and MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice at 10 hours after intranasal infection with 5 105 CFUs (5 mice/group) of PP34 (NETotic strain) or PP34ExoUS142A (pyroptotic strain). Graphs represent one experiment (5 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. E. Survival of MRP8Cre- Casp1flox and MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice intranasally infected with 1.107 CFUs of PAO1 (NETotic and pyroptotic strain) or PAO1ΔExoS (pyroptotic strain) for 24 hours (n = 6 animals per condition). Graphs represent one experiment (6 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments. Log-rank Cox-Mantel test was used for survival comparisons. NS; Not significant. F. Bronchoalveolar (BAL) and lung bacterial loads (colony forming units, CFUs) in MRP8Cre- Casp1flox and MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice intranasally infected with 5.106 CFUs of PAO1 (NETotic and pyroptotic strain) or PAO1ΔExoS (pyroptotic strain) for 24 hours. Graphs represent one experiment (7 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test. G. Determination of IL-1β levels in Bronchoalveolar Fluids (BALFs) MRP8Cre- Casp1flox and MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice at 8 hours after intranasal infection with 5. 106 CFUs (5 mice/group) of PAO1 (NETotic and pyroptotic strain) or PAO1ΔExoS (pyroptotic strain). Graphs represent one experiment (5 mice/group) out of three independent in vivo experiments; **p ≤ 0.01, Mann-Whitney analysis test.

Next, we sought to determine the importance of neutrophil Caspase-1 in response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Thus, we intranasally infected mice lacking CASP1 expression in the granulocytic compartment (MRP8Cre+Casp1flox) and their respective controls (MRP8Cre-Casp1flox) with ExoS- or ExoU-expressing P. aeruginosa (respectively PAO1 and PP34) or with their isogenic mutants PAO1ΔExoS and PP34ExoUS142A, both of which mostly triggered a Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis in vitro. We observed that, upon lung infections with PP34, MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice did not show any differences in bacterial elimination or IL1β production, thus confirming previous work that ExoU-expressing Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains promote successful infection independently of the inflammasome pathways (Fig 5B–5D) [49, 50]. To the contrary, MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice infected with PAO1, showed a slight but significant improved bacterial elimination in Bronchoalveolar Fluids (BALF) and lungs, a phenotype that was further amplified upon infection with PAO1ΔExoS and PP34ExoUS142A pyroptotic strains (Fig 5B–5G). Furthermore, IL-1β levels in BALFs were decreased in MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice infected with PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS and PP34ExoUS142A. Although we cannot exclude that lower bacterial loads in MRP8Cre+Casp1flox mice could influence the levels of IL-1β measured in BALFs, those results suggest that neutrophil Caspase-1 is also a contributor of IL-1β production upon PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS and PP34ExoUS142A infections (Fig 5D and 5G). Altogether, our results highlight that neutrophil Caspase-1 contributes to both IL-1β release and mouse susceptibility to several P. aeruginosa strains.

Discussion

Our study initially aimed at determining if neutrophil resistance to undergo Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis can be overcome upon bacterial infection. Screening various inflammasome-activating bacteria [5, 28, 29], we found that P. aeruginosa successfully trigger murine and human neutrophil pyroptosis through the engagement of the fully competent canonical NLRC4 inflammasome, a process that requires T3SS-dependent injection of bacterial Flagellin. Although those results show a clear ability of neutrophils to undergo Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis upon P. aeruginosa infection, our investigations performed with mice specifically lacking Caspase-1 in the granulocyte compartment do suggest a minor contribution of Caspase-1 upon P. aeruginosa infection. Related to this, previous studies showed a robust contribution of NLRC4 at promoting P. aeruginosa spread in various organs, which suggests that macrophages or other NLRC4-expressing cells are stronger contributors of mouse susceptibility to P. aeruginosa [51, 52]. Related to this, NLRC4-driven both IL-1β and IL-18 release upon P. aeruginosa infection has been linked to an altered IL-17 production and a defect of mice to efficiently control P. aeruginosa [51, 52]. Here, we speculate that the contribution of neutrophils at releasing IL-1β might also help the deviated immune response of the host to P. aeruginosa, hence leading to a better survival of this bacterium in host tissues. Another guess relies on the preferred extracellular tropism of P. aeruginosa. Hence, one could speculate that T3SS-injected Flagellin directly through the neutrophil plasma membrane might trigger an inefficientpyroptosis and favors P. aeruginosa escape from microbial trapping and/or killing [53].

Although neutrophils show intrinsic resistance to NLRC4-dependent pyroptosis (e.gs. ESCRT machinery, Caspase-1 expression levels, Ragulator pathway) [3, 5456], the unique ability of P. aeruginosa strains and isogenic mutants (PAO1, CHA, PAO1ΔExoS, PP34ΔExoU) to trigger neutrophil pyroptosis suggests that several neutrophil factors could restrict the ability of other bacteria to promote NLRC4-dependent pyroptosis. Seminal study from Zychlynsky and colleagues found that neutrophil serine proteases could degrade the Type-3 Secretion System and flagellin virulence factors of Shigella flexneri [57], hence limiting their ability to hijack the neutrophil autonomous immunity and restraining Shigella-induced neutrophil necrosis. The lack of differences of pyroptosis induction between WT and NE-/-CatG-/-Pr3-/- neutrophils upon P. aeruginosa suggests that, at least in murine neutrophils, those components do not regulate P. aeruginosa-driven NLRC4-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis. Similarly, upon P. aeruginosa infection, mouse neutrophils deficient for the NADPH oxidase enzyme Nox2 undergo increased Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis [44]. Supporting this, Warnatsch et al., could link the extracellular Oxygen Reactive Species (ROS) localization in neutrophils exposed to Candida albicans to an exacerbated IL-1β production and Caspase-1 activation whereas intracellular ROS had an inhibitory effect on IL1β production and Caspase-1 activity in neutrophils [58]. Whether this could explain the capacity of the extracellularly-adapted Pseudomonas aeruginosa to specifically promote Caspase-1-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis but not intracellular-adapted bacterial pathogens such as Shigella or Salmonella will require further investigations.

Related to this, studies showing that activation of the neutrophil NLRC4 inflammasome by S. Typhirmurium or the opportunistic pathogen B. thaïlandensis did not promote canonical pyroptosis also showed that Caspase-11-detected LPS could trigger neutrophil pyroptosis in response to those bacteria. This suggests that, in absence of efficient canonical inflammasome-driven pyroptosis, Caspase-11 might compensate at triggering neutrophil pyroptosis upon Gram-negative bacterial infections. Here, the lack of Caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils upon P. aeruginosa infection suggests that NLRC4 inflammasome-induced neutrophil pyroptosis upon P. aeruginosa infection is well effective and sufficient.

Striking to us was the observation that expression of the key virulence factors ExoS or ExoU strongly influences neutrophils to go into NETosis whereas strains lacking ExoU or ExoS induced a complete rewiring of neutrophil death toward a Caspase-1-driven way. We hypothesize that the potent cytotoxic effect of these toxins towards various cell types, including neutrophils, may overcome inflammasome detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and triggers other neutrophil death programs [42, 43, 5961]. Another non mutually exclusive guess is that these toxins directly interfere with the activation of the inflammasome pathway, thus removal of such toxins leads to an exacerbated inflammasome-response as previously reported for ExoU [40] and ExoS [62].

Although NLRC4 activation leads to Caspase-1 dependent neutrophil pyroptosis, in a pathway similar to what was previously reported in macrophage [40, 52], neutrophil pyroptosis exhibits a unique feature characterized by nuclear membrane rupture, DNA decondensation and expansion within cell cytosol. One key enzyme responsible for this morphological characteristic of neutrophil pyroptosis is the Protein arginine deiminase 4 (PAD4), activated by Calcium fluxes. Indeed, similar to the process induced by various NETosis inducers, Caspase-1 also promoted Calcium- and PAD4-dependent Histone Citrullination, which stimulated DNA relaxation and release from the nucleus but, surprisingly, not its extracellular expulsion. Why upon Caspase-11 [3], MLKL [21], NADPH [17] or NE/CatG/Pr3 [15] stimulation but not upon Caspase-1 activation neutrophils generate two different types of DNA structures remains yet to be investigated. Recently, Thiam et al., [18] observed that pharmacological stabilization of F-actin allowed the development of this “incomplete/aborted NETosis” upon Ionomycin-exposure. Interestingly, neutrophil elastase has also been shown to degrade actin [63], hence ensuring complete NETosis process. This, suggests that efficient actin degradation and/or depolymerization may be an essential player of extracellular DNA release, which would imply that the final step of NETosis might actually be a cell-regulated process involving various controllers [14, 20]. Interestingly, Chen and colleagues recently found that upon infection with Yersinia, murine neutrophils induce a pyroptotic program that involves virulence-inhibited innate immune sensing, hence promoting RIPK1-induced Caspase 3-dependent Gasdermin E cleavage and activation and pyroptosis [64], a process that does not trigger NETosis. This further suggests that multiple Gasdermins can trigger neutrophil pyroptosis through multiple molecular pathways and promote different morphological outcomes of neutrophils.

Regarding the immunological purpose of Caspase-1-induced neutrophil pyroptosis, we hypothesize that the decondensation of DNA but its conservation into the intracellular space might be a physical mean for neutrophils to trap some intracellular DAMPs, hence avoiding their passive release and a too strong exacerbation of the inflammatory response. Supporting this, we observed that DNA-bound Histones mostly remain trapped intracellularly, but not HMGB1 alarmin, both initially located in the nucleus. In the light of the recent discovery from Kayagaki and colleagues on the role for Ninjurin-1 at promoting active cell shrinkage and HMGB1/nucleosome DAMP release downstream of GSDMD pores in macrophages, the use of Ninjurin-1 deficient mice are full of promises [65]. Another hypothesis is that canonical inflammasome-induced neutrophil pyroptosis keeps DNA intracellularly to generate “Intracellular Traps” according to the “Pyroptosis-induced Intracellular Traps” model in macrophages described by Miao and colleagues [53]. In such a speculative model, intracellular pathogens, in addition to intracellular toxic DAMPs (e.g. Histones, DNA) might remain intracellularly, hence limiting both microbial spread and pathological DAMP-dependent inflammation.

Altogether, our results unveil the ability of neutrophils to undergo Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis upon Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection which is associated with IL-1ß and soluble alarmin release in the extracellular environment, while maintaining decondensed DNA/citrullinated histone complexes intracellularly, hence expanding the spectrum of neutrophil death mechanisms. Finally, we show that this mechanism contributes to host susceptibility to P. aeruginosa infection in vivo.

Methods

Ethics statement

License to use human samples is under legal agreement with the EFS; contract n° 21PLER2017-0035AV02 after “Haute Garonne ethical committee reviewing”, according to Decret N° 2007–1220 (articles L1243-4, R1243-61).

Mice experiments are under legal authorizations APAFIS#8521–2017041008135771 and APAFIS#12812–2018031218075551 after “IPBS and regional ethical committee evaluation”, according to the local, French and European ethic laws.

All reagents, concentrations of use and their references are listed in S1 Table

Mice

Nlrc4–/–[66], Nlrp3–/–[67], ASC–/–, Casp1–/–, Casp11–/–[68, 69], Casp1–/–Casp11–/–[68, 69], GsdmD–/–, Aim2–/–, Pad4–/–, MRP8Cre+GFP+, MRP8Cre+Casp1flox were generated and described in previous studies. Mice were bred at the IPBS (Toulouse, France) and INRAE (Tours Nouzilly, France) animal facilities in agreement to the EU and French directives on animal welfare (Directive 2010/63/EU). Charles Rivers provided WT C57BL/6 mice.

MRP8CreCasp1flox mice genotyping

Casp1flox/flox mice were kindly provided by Mo Lamkanfi and were crossed to MRP8Cre mice to generate MRP8CreCasp1flox. Caspase-1 genotyping was performed using Primer Fw: CGAGGGTTGGAGCTCAAGTTGACC and Primer Rv: CACTTTGACTTCTCTAAGGACAG. Cre genotyping was performed using Primers Fw: CGCCGTAAATCAATCGATGAGTTGCTTC and Primers Rv: GATGCCGGTGAACGTGCAAAACAGGCTC.

Bacterial cultures

P. aeruginosa strains (PAO1, CHA, PP34) and their isogenic mutants were grown overnight in Luria Broth (LB) medium at 37°C with constant agitation.

Legionella pneumophilia (L. pneumophilia, strain Philadelphia-1) was cultivated at 37°C in Charcoal Yeast Extract Buffered Medium according to ATCC recommendations.

Francisella tularensis spp novicida (F. novicida, strain U112) was cultivated overnight at 37°C in BHI medium supplemented with 0.2% L-Cysteine.

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus, strain USA-300) was cultivated in BHI medium, overnight at 37°C.

Shigella flexnerii (S. flexnerii, strain M90T) was cultivated overnight at 37°C in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) according to ATCC recommendations.

Salmonella Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium, strain SL1344), Burkholderia thailandensis (B. thailandensis, strain E264), Listeria monocytogenes (L. monocytogenes, strain EGD), Burkholderia cenocepaciae (B. cenocepaciae, strain LMG 16656), Escherichia coli (E. Coli, strain K12), Vibrio cholera (V. cholera, strain El tor) were cultivated overnight at 37°C in LB medium.

Bacteria were sub-cultured the next day by diluting overnight culture 1:25 and grew until reaching an optical density (OD) O.D.600 of 0.6–0.8.

Bacterial strains and their mutants are listed in S1 Table.

Bacterial KO generation and complementation

The knockout vector pEXG2 was constructed and used based on the protocol described by Rietsch et al. [70] with the following modifications. Briefly, 700-bp sequences of the flanking regions of the selected gene were amplified by PCR with Q5 high fidelity polymerase (New England Biolabs). Then, the flanking regions were gel purified and inserted into pEXG2 plasmid by Gibson assembly [71]. The assembled plasmid was directly transformed into competent SM10λpir using Mix&Go competent cells (Zymo Research Corporation) and plated on selective LB plates containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 15 μg/mL gentamicin. The resulting clones were sequenced, and mating was allowed for 4 h with PAO1 strain at 37°C. The mated strains were selected for single cross over on plates containing 15 μg/mL gentamicin and 20 μg/mL Irgasan (removal of E.coli SM10 strains). The next day, some clones were grown in LB for 4 hours and streaked on 5% sucrose LB plates overnight at 30°C. P. aeruginosa clones were then checked by PCR for mutations. All primers were designed with Snapgene software (GSL Biotech LLC).

Mice infections

Age and sex-matched animals (5–8 weeks old) per group were infected intranasally with 5.105 (lethal doses) or 2.5.105 CFUs of PP34/PP34ExoUS142A/PP34ΔExoU or with 1.107 CFUs (lethal doses) or 5.106 CFUs of PAO1/PAO1ΔExoS strains suspended in 25μL of PBS. Animals were sacrificed at indicated times after infection and bronchoalveolar fluids (BALFs) and lungs were recovered. When specified, bacterial loads (CFU plating), cytokine levels (ELISA) were evaluated. No randomization or blinding were done.

Intravital microscopy experiments

We relied on the previously published lung intravital microscopy method using an intercoastal thoracic window [72, 73], adapted at the IPBS CNRS-University of Toulouse TRI platform.

MRP8-mTmG mice (8–12 weeks old) were infected intratracheally with 5.105 CFUs of P. aeruginosa PP34 or PP34ExoUS142A strains resuspended in 50μL of PBS and imaged 6 to 8 hours after infection. 50μL of 50μM solution of SYTOX blue (Life Technologies) was injected both intravenously (retroorbital) and intratracheally just before imaging to visualize extracellular DNA.

Next, mice were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine and secured to a microscope stage. A small tracheal cannula was inserted, sutured and attached to a MiniVent mouse ventilator (Harvard Apparatus). Mice were ventilated with a tidal volume of 10 μl of compressed air (21% O2) per gram of mouse weight, a respiratory rate of 130–140 breaths per minute, and a positive-end expiratory pressure of 2–3 cm H2O. Isoflurane was continuously delivered to maintain anesthesia and 300 μl of 0.9% saline solution were i.p. administered in mice every hour for hydration. Mice were placed in the right lateral decubitus position and a small surgical incision was made to expose the rib cage. A second incision was then made into the intercostal space between ribs 4 and 5, through the parietal pleura, to expose the surface of the left lung lobe. A flanged thoracic window with an 8 mm coverslip was inserted between the ribs and secured to the stage using a set of optical posts and a 90° angle post clamp (Thor Labs). Suction was applied to gently immobilize the lung (Dexter Medical). Mice were placed in 30°C heated box during microscopy acquisition to maintain the body temperature and the 2-photon microscope objective was lowered over the thoracic window. Intravital imaging was performed using a Zeiss 7MP upright multi-photon microscope equipped with a 20×/1.0 objective and a Ti-Sapphire femtosecond laser, Chameleon-Ultra II (Coherent Inc.) tuned to 920 nm. SYTOX Blue, GFP and Tomato emission signals were detected thanks to the respective bandpass filters: Blue (SP485), Green (500–550) and Red (565–610). Images were analyzed using Imaris software (Bitplane) and Zen (Zeiss).

Isolation of primary murine neutrophils

Murine Bone marrow cells were isolated from tibias and femurs, and neutrophils were purified by positive selection using Anti-Ly-6G MicroBead Kit (Miltenyi Biotech) according to manufacturer’s instructions. This process routinely yielded >95% of neutrophil population as assessed by flow cytometry of Ly6G+/CD11b+ cells.

Isolation of primary human neutrophils

Whole blood was collected from healthy donors by the “Ecole française du sang” (EFS, Toulouse Purpan, France) in accordance with relevant guidelines. Written, informed consent was obtained from each donor. Neutrophils were then isolated by negative selection using MACSxpress Whole Blood Human Neutrophil Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotech) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Following isolations cells were centrifuged 10 min at 300 g and red blood cells were eliminated using Red blood cells (RBC) Lysis Buffer (BioLegend). This procedure gives >95% of neutrophil population as assessed by flow cytometry of CD15+/CD16+ cells.

Cell plating and treatment of Neutrophils

Following isolation, Neutrophils were centrifugated for 10 min at 300 g and pellet was resuspendent in serum free OPTI-MEM medium. Absolute cell number was determined with automated cell counter Olympus R1 with trypan blue cell death exclusion method (typically living cells represent >70% of cell solution) and cell density was adjusted at 106 / mL by adding OPTI-MEM culture medium. Neutrophils were then plated in either 96 well plates, 24 well plates or 6 well plates with 100 μL (105 cells), 500 μL (5.105 cells) or 2 mL (2.106 cells) respectively. When indicated cells were incubated with chemical inhibitors Z-VAD-fmk (20 μM), Y-VAD-fmk (20μM, 40 μM), Z-DEVD-fmk (40μM), Z-IETD-fmk (40μM), Z-LEVD (40μM), GSK484 (10 μM), as indicated in each experimental setting. Neutrophils were infected with various bacterial strains and multiplicity of infections (M.O.I.) as indicated.

Kinetic analysis of Neutrophil’s permeability by SYTOX Green incorporation assay

Cells are plated at density of 1 x 105 per well in Black/Clear 96-well Plates in OPTI-MEM culture medium supplemented with SYTOX-Green dye (100ng/mL) and infected/treated as mentioned in figure legend. Green fluorescence are measured in real-time using Clariostar plate reader equipped with a 37°C cell incubator. Maximal cell death was determined with whole cell lysates from unstimulated cells incubated with 1% Triton X-100.

ELISA and plasma membrane lysis tests

Cell death was measured by quantification of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release into the cell supernatant using LDH Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (Takara). Briefly, 100 μL cell supernatant were incubated with 100 μL LDH substrate and incubated for 15 min. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by adding 50 μL of stop solution. Maximal cell death was determined with whole cell lysates from unstimulated cells incubated with 1% Triton X-100. Human and mouse IL-1β secretion was quantified by ELISA kits (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Preparation of neutrophil lysates and supernatant for immunoblot

At the end of the treatment 5 mM of diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) cell permeable serine protease inhibitor was added to cell culture medium. Cell’ Supernatant was collected and clarified from non-adherent cells by centrifugation for 10 min at 300 g. Cell pellet and adherent cells were lysed in 100 μL of RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% Na-deoxycholate) supplemented with 5 mM diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) in addition to the protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Cell scrapper was used to ensure optimal recovery of cell lysate. Collected cell lysate was homogenized by pipetting up and down ten times and supplemented with laemli buffer (1X final) before boiling sample for 10 min at 95°C. Soluble proteins from cell supernatant fraction were precipitated as described previously [74]. Precipitated pellet was then resuspended in 100 μL of RIPA buffer plus laemli supplemented with 5 mM diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) and protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) and heat denaturated for 10 min at 95°C. Cell lysate and cell supernatant fraction were then analysed by immunoblot either individually or in pooled sample of lysate plus supernatant (equal vol/vol).

Treatment of Neutrophils for Immunofluorescences

5.105 Cells were plated on 1.5 glass coverslips in 24 well plate and infected/treated as described above. At the end of the assay, cell supernatant was removed and cells were fixed with a 4% PFA solution for 10 min at 37°C. PFA was then removed and cells were washed 3 times with HBSS. When desired, plasma membrane was stained with Wheat Germ Agglutinin, Alexa Fluor 633 Conjugate (ThermoFisher Scientifique) at 1/100th dilution in HBSS, and incubated for 30 min under 100 rpm orbital shaking conditions. Then cells were washed with HBSS and processed for further staining. Permeabilization was performed by incubating cells for 10 min in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. To block unspecific binding of the antibodies cells are incubated in PBS-T (PBS+ 0.1% Tween 20), containing 2% BSA, 22.52 mg/mL glycine in for 30 min. 3 washes with PBS-T was performed between each steps. Primary antibodies staining was performed overnight at 4°C in BSA 2%—Tween 0.1%—PBS (PBS-T) solution. Coverslips were washed three times with PBS-T and incubated with the appropriate fluor-coupled secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature. DNA was counterstained with Hoechst. Cells were then washed three times with PBS and mounted on glass slides using Vectashield (Vectalabs). Coverslips were imaged using confocal Zeiss LSM 710 (INFINITY, Toulouse) or Olympus Spinning disk (Image core Facility, IPBS, Toulouse) using a 40x or a 63x oil objective. Unless specified, for each experiment, 5–10 fields (∼50–250 cells) were manually counted using Image J software.

Scanning electron microscopy experiments

For scanning electron microscopy observations, cells were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.2M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). Preparations were then washed three times for 5min in 0.2M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) and washed with distilled water. Samples were dehydrated through a graded series (25 to 100%) of ethanol, transferred in acetone and subjected to critical point drying with CO2 in a Leica EM CPD300. Dried specimens were sputter-coated with 3 nm platinum with a Leica EM MED020 evaporator and were examined and photographed with a FEI Quanta FEG250.

ImageStreamX

Cells isolated from Bronchoalveolar (BAL) washes were pelleted by centrifugation (10 min at 300 g). Neutrophils were stained prior to fixation with anti-Ly6G (APC-Vio770, Miltenyi-Biotec Clone: REA526 | Dilution: 1:50) in MACS buffer (PBS-BSA 0,5%-EDTA 2mM) in presence of FC block (1/100) and Hoechst (1 μM). Then, cells were fixed in 4% PFA. Data were acquired on ImageStreamXMKII (Amnis) device (CPTP Imaging and Cytometry core facility) and analyzed using IDEAS software v2.6 (Amnis). The gating strategy used to evaluate inflammasome activation in neutrophils was performed as follow: (i) a gate was set on cells in focus [Cells in Focus] and (ii) a sub-gate was created on single cells [Single Cells]. Then we gated first on (iii) LY6G+ Neutrophils [LY6G+] and second on (iv) ASC-citrine+ and Hoechst+ cells [Hoechst+/ASC-Citrine+] within LY6G+ population. (v) To distinguish cells with active (ASC-speck) versus inactive inflammasome (Diffuse ASC), we plotted the Intensity with the area of ASC-citrine. This strategy allow to distinguish cells with active inflammasome that were visualized and quantified (S2D Fig).

Statistical tests used

Statistical analysis was performed with Prism 8.0a (GraphPad Software, Inc). Otherwise specified, data are reported as mean with SEM. T-test with Bonferroni correction was chosen for comparison of two groups. Two-way Anova with multiple comparisons test was used for comparison of more than two groups. For in vivo mice experiments and comparisons we used Mann-Whitney tests and mouse survival analysis were performed using log-rank Cox-Mantel test. P values are shown in figures with the following meaning; NS non-significant and Significance is specified as *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001.

Supporting information

S1 Table. List and reference of Reagents and Tools available.

(DOCX)

S1 Movie. Time Lapse Fluorescence microscopy of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with PP34 (NETotic strain, MOI 2) for 9 hours (540 minutes).

Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in yellow (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining); plasma membrane permeabilization is stained in red (cell impermanent DNA dye Propidium Iodide, PI).

(AVI)

S2 Movie. Time Lapse Fluorescence microscopy of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with PP34S142 (Pyroptotic strain, MOI 2) for 9 hours (540 minutes).

Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in yellow (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining); plasma membrane permeabilization is stained in red (cell impermanent DNA dye Propidium Iodide, PI).

(AVI)

S3 Movie. 3D reconstruction and projection of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with P. aeruginosa NETotic strain PP34 (MOI 2) for 3 hours.

Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in red (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining).

(MP4)

S4 Movie. 3D reconstruction and projection of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PP34 ExoUS142 (MOI 2) for 3 hours.

Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in red (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining).

(MP4)

S5 Movie. Intravital microscopy visualization of granulocyte death in MRP8-GFP+ mice infected with 2.5.105 CFUs of PP34 (NETosis-inducing strains) or PP34ExoUS142A (pyroptosis-inducing strain) in presence of SYTOX Blue for 10 hours.

Granulocyte death was observed in infected lungs by the appearance of SYTOX blue fluorescence. Pseudo colors represent vessels (gray, mTG); Granulocytes (Green, MRP8-GFP+); Dead cells (Purple, SYTOX blue). Scale bar: 20μm.

(MP4)

S1 Fig. Multiple P. aeruginosa strains trigger Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils.

A. Measure of basal cell lysis (release of LDH) in WT and Casp1-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) in culture for the indicated times. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. B. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or Casp1-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and its isogenic mutants lacking T3SS expression (PAO1ΔExsA), Flagellin (PAO1ΔFliC) or T3SS-derived toxins ExoS, ExoY, ExoT (PAO1ΔExoS, PAO1ΔExoY, PAO1ΔExoT) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. C. Measure of bacterial uptake (Colony-forming Units, CFUs) in WT or Casp1-/- BMNs infected for 45 minutes with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and its isogenic mutants lacking Flagellin (PAO1ΔFliC), Flagellin motors MotABCD (PAO1ΔMotABCD) or both Flagellin and Flagellin motors MotABCD (PAO1ΔFliC/ΔMotABCD) at a MOI of 10. Here, due to their lack of motility, bacteria were centrifuged for 5 min/1000 rpm to ensure neutrophil/bacterial contact. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graph show one experiment representative of three independent experiments. D. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT and Casp1-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for the indicated times with PAO1ΔMotABCD or PAO1ΔFliC/ΔMotABCD at an MOI of 10. Here, due to their lack of motility, bacteria were centrifuged for 5 min/1000 rpm to ensure neutrophil/bacterial contact. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. E. Measure of the percentage of cells with plasma membrane permeabilization over time using SYTOX Green incorporation in murine WT and Casp1-/- BMNs infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant invalidated for ExoU catalytic activity PP34ExoUS142A at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. F. Measure of the percentage of cells with plasma membrane permeabilization over time using SYTOX Green incorporation in human blood neutrophils BMNs infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant invalidated for ExoU catalytic activity PP34ExoUS142A at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 in presence/absence of various Caspase inhibitors, Z-YVAD (Casp1 inhibitor, 20μM), Z-DEVD (Casp3/7 inhibitor, 20μM), Z-IETD (Casp8 inhibitor, 20μM). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. P. aeruginosa triggers NLRC4-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils.

A. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) in WT, Casp1-/-, Casp1-/-, Casp11-/-, Casp1-/-Casp11-/-, Nlrp3-/-, AIM2-/—, Nlrc4-/- and ASC-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyroptotic strains PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) and PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. B. Gating strategy used to evaluate inflammasome activation in neutrophils was performed as follow: (i) a gate was set on cells in focus [Cells in Focus] and (ii) a sub-gate was created on single cells [Single Cells]. Then we gated first on (iii) LY6G+ Neutrophils [LY6G+] and second on (iv) ASC-citrine+ and Hoechst+ cells [Hoechst+/ASC-Citrine+] within LY6G+ population. (v) To distinguish cells with active (ASC-speck) versus inactive inflammasome (Diffuse ASC), we plotted the Intensity with the area of ASC-citrine. This strategy allow to distinguish cells with active inflammasome that were visualized and quantified.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. NLRC4-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis associates to DNA decondensation.

A. Confocal microscopy observations and quantification of primary human blood neutrophils infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) and harboring ASC complexes, decondensed DNA and plasma membrane. Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in Red (anti-ASC); Plasma membrane is in grey (WGA). Scale bar 10μm. Images are representative of one experiment performed three times with at least 6–10 fields neutrophils observed/ quantified for ASC specks ratios. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. B. Immunoblotting observation of Histone 3, HMGB1, Lamin B1, GAPDH, Actin, Gasdermin D (GSDMD) and NLRC4 in cellular soluble and insoluble fractions as well as in the supernatant from WT and Nlrc4-/- murine BMNs infected with P. aeruginosa NETotic strain PP34 or pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) for 3 hours. Immunoblots show one experiment performed two times. C. Overview of the different steps induced in neutrophils during NLRC4 inflammasome activation by various Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Inflammasome signalling induce neutrophil DNA decondensation through Calcium-dependent, but cell lysis-independent, manner.

A. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of human blood neutrophils infected for 3 hours with PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10) or PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) in presence/absence of Caspase-1 inhibitor Z-YVAD (20μM) and harboring Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit), decondensed DNA and nuclear membrane (LaminB1). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Citrullinated Histone-3 is in red (anti H3-Cit); plasma membrane is in grey (WGA staining). Scale bar 10μm. Images are representative of one experiment performed three times with at least 150 neutrophils observed/ experiment. B. Immunoblotting of Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3Cit), total Histone 3 and preformed and cleaved Gasdermin-D (p55/p30) in WT, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- BMNs treated with Ionomycin (10μM, 3 hours) or infected for 3 hours with PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS, PAO1ExsA- (MOI 10) or with PP34, PP34ΔExoU (MOI 2). Immunoblots show combined lysates and supernatants from one experiment performed three times. C. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of WT and GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PAO1ExoUS142A (MOI 2) in presence/absence of EGTA (10mM) and harboring Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit) and decondensed DNA. Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Histone-3 Citrullination is in red (Anti-H3Cit staining). For quantifications, the percentage of cells positives for H3Cit (H3-Cit+) and decondensed DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for H3Cit and decondensed DNA over the total amount of cells. At least 6 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. D. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with PP34ExoUS142A (MOI2) or PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10) in presence/absence of EGTA (10mM). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. E. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of WT and GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PAO1ExoUS142A (MOI 2) in presence/absence of Glycine (5mM) and harboring Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit) and decondensed DNA. Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Histone-3 Citrullination is in red (Anti-H3Cit staining). For quantifications, the percentage of cells positives for H3Cit (H3-Cit+) and decondensed DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for H3Cit and decondensed DNA over the total amount of cells. At least 6 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. F. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with PP34ExoUS142A (MOI2) or PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10) in presence/absence of Glycine (5mM). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

Nlrc4–/–mice were provided by Clare E. Bryant [66] and generated by Millenium Pharmaceutical, GsdmD–/–mice [75] came from P. Broz (Univ of Lausanne, Switzerland), Casp11–/–and Casp1–/–/ Casp11–/–came from B. Py (ENS Lyon, France) and Junying Yuan (Harvard Med School, Boston, USA) [68, 69]. Virginie Petrilli (ENS Lyon, France) provided Nlrp3–/–mice that were generated by Fabio Martinon [67]. Thomas Henry (CIRI, Lyon, France) provided ASC–/–and AIM2–/–mice upon agreement with Genentech (Roche, San Francisco, USA) and. ASC-Citrine (#030744) and Pad4–/–(#030315) mice came from Jaxson Laboratory (USA) and were generated by Douglas T Golenbock (University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA) and Kerri Mowen (The Scripps Research Institute, USA) respectively. MRP8Cre/Casp1flox mice are provided by Natalie Winter (INRAE Tours Nouzilly, France) and were generated by crossing MRP8Cre (Jackson # 021614) mice with Caspase1flox mice generated by Mohamed Lamkanfi (Univ. of Ghent, Belgium)[76]. MRP8CreGFP and mTmG mice were obtained from Jackson laboratories and generated respectively by Emmanuelle Passegue (UCSF, USA) and Liqun Luo, (Stanford University, USA). Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were a kind gift of Ina Attrée (CNRS, Grenoble, France). Authors also acknowledge the animal facility and Cytometry/microscopy platforms of the INFINITY, CBI and IPBS institutes and particularly Valerie Duplan-Eche for Imagestream acquisition and analysis.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by the Fonds de Recherche en Santé Respiratoire - Fondation du Souffle (to EL), ATIP-Avenir program (to EM), FRM “Amorçage Jeunes Equipes” (AJE20151034460 to EM) and the ERC (StG INFLAME 804249 to EM), the NIH (AR073752 to CTNP), the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID, to RP), Invivogen-CIFRE PhD grant (to MP), Invivogen post-doctoral fellowship (to RP) and a PhD fellowship from the Minister of Research of Mali and Campus France agency (to SB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018. Cell Death and Differentiation. Nature Publishing Group; 2018. pp. 486–541. doi: 10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Kill Bacteria. Science (80-). 2004;303: 1532–1535. doi: 10.1126/science.1092385 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen KW, Monteleone M, Boucher D, Sollberger G, Ramnath D, Condon ND, et al. Noncanonical inflammasome signaling elicits gasdermin D–dependent neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Immunol. 2018;3: 6676. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Li P, Li M, Lindberg MR, Kennett MJ, Xiong N, Wang Y. PAD4 is essential for antibacterial innate immunity mediated by neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med. 2010;207: 1853–1862. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kovacs SB, Oh C, Maltez VI, McGlaughon BD, Verma A, Miao EA, et al. Neutrophil Caspase-11 Is Essential to Defend against a Cytosol-Invasive Bacterium. Cell Rep. 2020;32. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martinod K, Fuchs TA, Zitomersky NL, Wong SL, Demers M, Gallant M, et al. PAD4-deficiency does not affect bacteremia in polymicrobial sepsis and ameliorates endotoxemic shock. Blood. 2015;125: 1948–1956. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-587709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Biron BM, Chung C-S, Chen Y, Wilson Z, Fallon EA, Reichner JS, et al. PAD4 Deficiency Leads to Decreased Organ Dysfunction and Improved Survival in a Dual Insult Model of Hemorrhagic Shock and Sepsis. J Immunol. 2018;200: ji1700639. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kahlenberg JM, Carmona-Rivera C, Smith CK, Kaplan MJ. Neutrophil Extracellular Trap–Associated Protein Activation of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Is Enhanced in Lupus Macrophages. J Immunol. 2013;190: 1217–1226. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, Schatzberg D, Monestier M, Myers DD, et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 15880–15885. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005743107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Apel F, Andreeva L, Knackstedt LS, Streeck R, Frese CK, Goosmann C, et al. The cytosolic DNA sensor cGAS recognizes neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Signal. 2021;14. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aax7942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kumar SVR, Kulkarni OP, Mulay SR, Darisipudi MN, Romoli S, Thomasova D, et al. Neutrophil extracellular trap-related extracellular histones cause vascular necrosis in severe GN. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26: 2399–2413. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014070673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lefrançais E, Mallavia B, Zhuo H, Calfee CS, Looney MR. Maladaptive role of neutrophil extracellular traps in pathogen-induced lung injury. JCI insight. 2018;3. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.98178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Knackstedt SL, Georgiadou A, Apel F, Abu-Abed U, Moxon CA, Cunnington AJ, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps drive inflammatory pathogenesis in malaria. Sci Immunol. 2019;4: 336. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aaw0336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Thiam HR, Wong SL, Wagner DD, Waterman CM. Cellular Mechanisms of NETosis. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. Annual Reviews Inc.; 2020. pp. 191–218. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-020520-111016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol. 2010;191: 677–691. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201006052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sollberger G, Choidas A, Burn GL, Habenberger P, Di Lucrezia R, Kordes S, et al. Gasdermin D plays a vital role in the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps. Sci Immunol. 2018;3. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.aar6689 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kenny EF, Herzig A, Krüger R, Muth A, Mondal S, Thompson PR, et al. Diverse stimuli engage different neutrophil extracellular trap pathways. Elife. 2017;6. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Thiama HR, Wong SL, Qiu R, Kittisopikul M, Vahabikashi A, Goldman AE, et al. NETosis proceeds by cytoskeleton and endomembrane disassembly and PAD4-mediated chromatin decondensation and nuclear envelope rupture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117: 7326–7337. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909546117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang Y, Li M, Stadler S, Correll S, Li P, Wang D, et al. Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Cell Biol. 2009;184: 205–213. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200806072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Neubert E, Meyer D, Rocca F, Günay G, Kwaczala-Tessmann A, Grandke J, et al. Chromatin swelling drives neutrophil extracellular trap release. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06263-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.D’Cruz AA, Speir M, Bliss-Moreau M, Dietrich S, Wang S, Chen AA, et al. The pseudokinase MLKL activates PAD4-dependent NET formation in necroptotic neutrophils. Sci Signal. 2018;11: 1716. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aao1716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen W, Zhao J, Mu D, Wang Z, Liu Q, Zhang Y, et al. Pyroptosis Mediates Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation during Bacterial Infection in Zebrafish. J Immunol. 2021; ji2001335. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2001335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xia S, Zhang Z, Magupalli VG, Pablo JL, Dong Y, Vora SM, et al. Gasdermin D pore structure reveals preferential release of mature interleukin-1. Nature. 2021; 1–5. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03478-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tsuchiya K, Hosojima S, Hara H, Kushiyama H, Mahib MR, Kinoshita T, et al. Gasdermin D mediates the maturation and release of IL-1α downstream of inflammasomes. Cell Rep. 2021;34: 108887. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Evavold CL, Ruan J, Tan Y, Xia S, Wu H, Kagan JC. The Pore-Forming Protein Gasdermin D Regulates Interleukin-1 Secretion from Living Macrophages. Immunity. 2018;48: 35–44.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Heilig R, Dick MS, Sborgi L, Meunier E, Hiller S, Broz P. The Gasdermin-D pore acts as a conduit for IL-1β secretion in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2018;48: 584–592. doi: 10.1002/eji.201747404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Amara N, Cooper MP, Voronkova MA, Webb BA, Lynch EM, Kollman JM, et al. Selective activation of PFKL suppresses the phagocytic oxidative burst. Cell. 2021;184: 4480–4494.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Karmakar M, Minns M, Greenberg EN, Diaz-Aponte J, Pestonjamasp K, Johnson JL, et al. N-GSDMD trafficking to neutrophil organelles facilitates IL-1β release independently of plasma membrane pores and pyroptosis. Nat Commun. 2020;11. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16043-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen KW, Groß CJ, Sotomayor FV, Stacey KJ, Tschopp J, Sweet MJ, et al. The Neutrophil NLRC4 Inflammasome Selectively Promotes IL-1β Maturation without Pyroptosis during Acute Salmonella Challenge. Cell Rep. 2014;8: 570–582. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Münzer P, Negro R, Fukui S, di Meglio L, Aymonnier K, Chu L, et al. NLRP3 Inflammasome Assembly in Neutrophils Is Supported by PAD4 and Promotes NETosis Under Sterile Conditions. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 1977. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.683803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aymonnier K, Ng J, Fredenburgh LE, Zambrano-Vera K, Münzer P, Gutch S, et al. Inflammasome activation in neutrophils of patients with severe COVID-19. Blood Adv. 2022. [cited 26 Jan 2022]. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005949 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lin CK, Kazmierczak BI. Inflammation: A Double-Edged Sword in the Response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection. J Innate Immun. 2017;9: 250–261. doi: 10.1159/000455857 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hauser AR. The Type III Secretion System of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Infection by Injection. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7: 654. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhao Y, Shi J, Shi X, Wang Y, Wang F, Shao F. Genetic functions of the NAIP family of inflammasome receptors for bacterial ligands in mice. J Exp Med. 2016;213: 647–656. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhao Y, Yang J, Shi J, Gong YN, Lu Q, Xu H, et al. The NLRC4 inflammasome receptors for bacterial flagellin and type III secretion apparatus. Nature. 2011;477: 596–602. doi: 10.1038/nature10510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rauch I, Tenthorey JL, Nichols RD, Al Moussawi K, Kang JJ, Kang C, et al. NAIP proteins are required for cytosolic detection of specific bacterial ligands in vivo. J Exp Med. 2016;213: 657–665. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Miao EA, Ernst RK, Dors M, Mao DP, Aderem A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa activates caspase 1 through Ipaf. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105: 2562–2567. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712183105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Franchi L, Stoolman J, Kanneganti TD, Verma A, Ramphal R, Núñez G. Critical role for Ipaf in Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced caspase-1 activation. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37: 3030–3039. doi: 10.1002/eji.200737532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hardy KS, Tessmer MH, Frank DW, Audia JP. Perspectives on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III Secretion System Effector ExoU and Its Subversion of the Host Innate Immune Response to Infection. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13: 880. doi: 10.3390/toxins13120880 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sutterwala FS, Mijares LA, Li L, Ogura Y, Kazmierczak BI, Flavell RA. Immune recognition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediated by the IPAF/NLRC4 inflammasome. J Exp Med. 2007;204: 3235–3245. doi: 10.1084/jem.20071239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rada B, Jendrysik MA, Pang L, Hayes CP, Yoo DG, Park JJ, et al. Pyocyanin-Enhanced Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation Requires the NADPH Oxidase. PLoS One. 2013;8: e54205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thanabalasuriar A, Scott BNV, Peiseler M, Willson ME, Zeng Z, Warrener P, et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Confine Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ocular Biofilms and Restrict Brain Invasion. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25: 526–536.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Skopelja-Gardner S, Theprungsirikul J, Lewis KA, Hammond JH, Carlson KM, Hazlett HF, et al. Regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Mediated Neutrophil Extracellular Traps. Front Immunol. 2019;10. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ryu JC, Kim MJ, Kwon Y, Oh JH, Yoon SS, Shin SJ, et al. Neutrophil pyroptosis mediates pathology of P. aeruginosa lung infection in the absence of the NADPH oxidase NOX2. Mucosal Immunol. 2017;10: 757–774. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Balakrishnan A, Karki R, Berwin B, Yamamoto M, Kanneganti TD. Guanylate binding proteins facilitate caspase-11-dependent pyroptosis in response to type 3 secretion system-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Cell Death Discov. 2018;4: 1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41420-018-0068-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Patankar YR, Lovewell RR, Poynter ME, Jyot J, Kazmierczak BI, Berwin B. Flagellar Motility Is a Key Determinant of the Magnitude of the Inflammasome Response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect Immun. 2013;81: 2043. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00054-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arita K, Hashimoto H, Shimizu T, Nakashima K, Yamada M, Sato M. Structural basis for Ca(2+)-induced activation of human PAD4. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11: 777–783. doi: 10.1038/nsmb799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Loomis WP, den Hartigh AB, Cookson BT, Fink SL. Diverse small molecules prevent macrophage lysis during pyroptosis. Cell Death Dis 2019 104. 2019;10: 1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1559-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Al Moussawi K, Kazmierczak BI. Distinct Contributions of Interleukin-1α (IL-1α) and IL-1β to Innate Immune Recognition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Lung. Infect Immun. 2014;82: 4204. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02218-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bagayoko S, Leon-Icaza SA, Pinilla M, Hessel A, Santoni K, Péricat D, et al. Host phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU-dependent cell necrosis and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Faure E, Mear J-B, Faure K, Normand S, Couturier-Maillard A, Grandjean T, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type-3 Secretion System Dampens Host Defense by Exploiting the NLRC4-coupled Inflammasome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189: 799–811. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201307-1358OC [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cohen TS, Prince AS. Activation of inflammasome signaling mediates pathology of acute P. aeruginosa pneumonia. J Clin Invest. 2013;123: 1630–1637. doi: 10.1172/JCI66142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jorgensen I, Zhang Y, Krantz BA, Miao EA. Pyroptosis triggers pore-induced intracellular traps (PITs) that capture bacteria and lead to their clearance by efferocytosis. J Exp Med. 2016;213: 2113–2128. doi: 10.1084/jem.20151613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Evavold CL, Hafner-Bratkovič I, Kagan JC. Downstream of gasdermin D cleavage, a Ragulator-Rag-mTORC1 pathway promotes pore formation and pyroptosis. bioRxiv. bioRxiv; 2020. p. 2020.11.02.362517. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.02.362517 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rühl S, Shkarina K, Demarco B, Heilig R, Santos JC, Broz P. ESCRT-dependent membrane repair negatively regulates pyroptosis downstream of GSDMD activation. Science (80-). 2018;362: 956–960. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bjanes E, Sillas RG, Matsuda R, Demarco B, Fettrelet T, Delaney AA, et al. The Card19 locus of murine chromosome 13 regulates terminal cell lysis downstream of caspase activation and Gasdermin-D cleavage Card19 locus regulates caspase-dependent cell lysis. bioRxiv. 2021; 2021.03.19.436207. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Weinrauch Y, Drujan D, Shapiro SD, Weiss J, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase targets virulence factors of enterobacteria. Nature. 2002;417: 91–94. doi: 10.1038/417091a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Warnatsch A, Tsourouktsoglou TD, Branzk N, Wang Q, Reincke S, Herbst S, et al. Reactive Oxygen Species Localization Programs Inflammation to Clear Microbes of Different Size. Immunity. 2017;46: 421–432. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kaminski A, Gupta KH, Goldufsky JW, Lee HW, Gupta V, Shafikhani SH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoS Induces Intrinsic Apoptosis in Target Host Cells in a Manner That is Dependent on its GAP Domain Activity. Sci Reports 2018 81. 2018;8: 1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32491-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vareechon C, Zmina SE, Karmakar M, Pearlman E, Rietsch A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Effector ExoS Inhibits ROS Production in Human Neutrophils. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;21: 611–618.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bagayoko S, Leon Icaza S, Pinilla M, Hessel A, Bordignon P-J, Moreau F, et al. Phospholipid peroxidation fuels ExoU phospholipase-dependent cell necrosis 1 and supports Pseudomonas aeruginosa-driven pathology 2. bioRxiv. 2021; 2021.02.17.431580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Galle M, Schotte P, Haegman M, Wullaert A, Yang HJ, Jin S, et al. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa Type III secretion system plays a dual role in the regulation of caspase-1 mediated IL-1β maturation. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12: 1767–1776. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00190.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Metzler KD, Goosmann C, Lubojemska A, Zychlinsky A, Papayannopoulos V. Myeloperoxidase-containing complex regulates neutrophil elastase release and actin dynamics during NETosis. Cell Rep. 2014;8: 883–896. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen KW, Demarco B, Heilig R, Ramos SP, Grayczyk JP, Assenmacher C-A, et al. RIPK1 activates distinct gasdermins in macrophages and neutrophils upon pathogen blockade of innate immune signalling. bioRxiv. 2021; 2021.01.20.427379. doi: 10.1101/2021.01.20.427379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kayagaki N, Kornfeld OS, Lee BL, Stowe IB, O’Rourke K, Li Q, et al. NINJ1 mediates plasma membrane rupture during lytic cell death. Nature. 2021;591: 131–136. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03218-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Man SM, Hopkins LJ, Nugent E, Cox S, Glück IM, Tourlomousis P, et al. Inflammasome activation causes dual recruitment of NLRC4 and NLRP3 to the same macromolecular complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111: 7403–7408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1402911111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Martinon F, Pétrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440: 237–241. doi: 10.1038/nature04516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Li P, Allen H, Banerjee S, Franklin S, Herzog L, Johnston C, et al. Mice deficient in IL-1β-converting enzyme are defective in production of mature IL-1β and resistant to endotoxic shock. Cell. 1995;80: 401–411. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90490-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wang S, Miura M, Jung YK, Zhu H, Li E, Yuan J. Murine caspase-11, an ICE-interacting protease, is essential for the activation of ICE. Cell. 1998;92: 501–509. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80943-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Rietsch A, Vallet-Gely I, Dove SL, Mekalanos JJ. ExsE, a secreted regulator of type III secretion genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 8006–8011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503005102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 2009 65. 2009;6: 343–345. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Headley MB, Bins A, Nip A, Roberts EW, Looney MR, Gerard A, et al. Visualization of immediate immune responses to pioneer metastatic cells in the lung. Nature. 2016;531: 513–517. doi: 10.1038/nature16985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Looney MR, Thornton EE, Sen D, Lamm WJ, Glenny RW, Krummel MF. Stabilized imaging of immune surveillance in the mouse lung. Nat Methods. 2011;8: 91–96. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Eren E, Planès R, Bagayoko S, Bordignon P, Chaoui K, Hessel A, et al. Irgm2 and Gate-16 cooperatively dampen Gram-negative bacteria-induced caspase-11 response. EMBO Rep. 2020;21: e50829. doi: 10.15252/embr.202050829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Demarco B, Grayczyk JP, Bjanes E, Le Roy D, Tonnus W, Assenmacher CA, et al. Caspase-8-dependent gasdermin D cleavage promotes antimicrobial defense but confers susceptibility to TNF-induced lethality. Sci Adv. 2020;6: 3465–3483. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc3465 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Van Gorp H, Saavedra PHV, De Vasconcelos NM, Van Opdenbosch N, Vande Walle L, Matusiak M, et al. Familial Mediterranean fever mutations lift the obligatory requirement for microtubules in Pyrin inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113: 14384–14389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1613156113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Vincent T Lee, David Skurnik

11 Mar 2022

Dear Dr. Meunier,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Caspase-1-driven neutrophil pyroptosis promotes an incomplete NETosis upon Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

The reviewers have identified experimental important issues that should be addressed. In addition, the text as written have issues with clarity. Examples include:

1. Description of results (example is Fig. 1B and Fig 2A-E). So brief that it doesn't seem to help the readers understand the data presented. Expanding these and other sections would be helpful.

2. Reference to Fig. 3E on line 265 seems incorrect.

3. Legends for some figure panels and figures can be improved for clarity. Fig 1D - are these showing merged micrographs or separate brightfield and SYTOX green images. It is not clear.

4. Overall, the authors are encouraged to have the language reviewed for clarity. A reduction in the use of quotation marks could be helpful.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Vincent T Lee

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

David Skurnik

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

The reviewers have identified experimental important issues that should be addressed. In addition, the text as written have issues with clarity. Examples include:

1. Description of results (example is Fig. 1B and Fig 2A-E). So brief that it doesn't seem to help the readers understand the data presented. Expanding these and other sections would be helpful.

2. Reference to Fig. 3E on line 265 seems incorrect.

3. Legends for some figure panels and figures can be improved for clarity. Fig 1D - are these showing merged micrographs or separate brightfield and SYTOX green images. It is not clear.

4. Overall, the authors are encouraged to have the language reviewed for clarity. A reduction in the use of quotation marks could be helpful.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: In the present manuscript, Santoni et al describe a phenomenon of incomplete netosis triggered by inflammasome activation by certain Pseudomonas strains in neutrophils. This is interesting as neutrophils have been believed to be largely refractory to pyroptosis upon bacterial infection under normal circumstances. The authors attribute some of the observed accompanying phenomena such as histone citrunillation to PAD4 activation but fail to uncover the reason for P. aeruginosa specific induction of neutrophil pyroptosis over other bacteria. They demonstrate a role for Caspase 1 in neutrophils with a neutrophil specific Casp1-Cre mouse line in the infectivity levels of Pseudomonas in vivo, extending on previously published data with whole Caspase-1 knockouts. Their observations suggest that NETosis is a very controlled process with several unknown aspects remaining.

Several of the observations require additional quantifications to allow the conclusions drawn, and the manuscript should be carefully edited for grammar and correct referencing of figures and panels.

Reviewer #2: Inflammasomes are multiprotein complexes that activate caspase-1 and -11. In most cases, activation of these inflammatory caspases promote IL-1b maturation and a lytic form of cell death known as pyroptosis. However, in neutrophils, caspase-1 activation appears to resist pyroptosis through a poorly understood mechanism. Here, Santoni and co-workers show that neutrophils are not universally resistant to caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis as previously reported. They found that various strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa can in fact trigger caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils, and some of these strains promote nuclear membrane rupture and histone citrullination in the absence of cell lysis, which the authors termed ‘incomplete NETosis’. Overall, this is an interesting manuscript and will be of interest to the microbiology and innate immunity community. However, this is a complicated study, and the presentation of the manuscript can be improved significantly. The labelling and definition require a lot of work – while the introduction, abstract and summary are quite well written, the results are very hard to follow, due to typo mistakes and inconsistent labelling. For example (also mentioned in point 5, 9), does PP34 normally express ExoU? If so, it is redundant to write PP34ExoU, since that implies exoU is introduced into the strain. Are the authors referring to the same strain when they mention ExoU- and ExoUS142A? Note that these are not the same. I suggest the to use the standard nomenclature for describing bacterial strains - (delta Greek sign)ExoU for knockout and not ExoU-, and clearly differentiate when using a catalytic inactive versus a knockout. There are also other experimental controls and concerns that should be addressed.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: - For the Pseudomonas strain comparison experiments shown in figure 1C and E and S1, it is important to verify that the strains are equally infectious to be able to draw any conclusion on the role of effectors. Also, aflagellated bacteria are expected to be less infectious due to their limited motility. It is not clear from the methods whether the authors i.e. spun Fla-negative bacteria onto cells to help with infection. Ideally, the authors would plate for numbers of intracellular bacteria at an early, pre-death timepoint or something similar

-Imaging in 3A, 3B and 3C needs to be quantified over multiple images. It is also not clear why the magnification for uninfected cells in 3A is different than for infected cells

-While GSK484 seems to be a very specific inhibitor, it would be nice to see the H3 citrullin staining and quantification as in 3E in Pad4 knockouts as used in the supplemental data.

Reviewer #2: Major points

1. Neutrophils are extremely short-lived and sensitive cells and should be undergoing 20-30% basal cell death at the end of inflammasome assays. Why are the values for LDH release for untreated neutrophils 0? I believe that is not possible. Authors should also indicate untreated values for all other experiments to determine the baseline of neutrophil cell death.

2. Early studies from different labs have shown that bacterial infection triggers at best 30-40% LDH release in neutrophils, a finding that the authors reproduced in Figure S2C too. Why are the values so high in Figure 1? Can the authors explain the discrepancy with the field? Are the neutrophils activated during purification?

3. Figure 1B: Author mentioned that Salmonella infection triggers caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in human neutrophils, but the Figure indicates ‘CHA’ but not Salmonella. What is CHA?

4. Y-VAD blocks both caspase-1 and -4. How can the authors be sure that the effect of Y-VAD is not due to blockade of caspase-4?

5. The section on PP34ExoU is very confusing and needs to be re-written (lines 237-246). Am I right to say that ExoU-deficient strains also trigger caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils?

6. PP34ExoU/FliC- is unable to trigger ASC speck in vivo but the lack of inflammasome activation for the double mutant has not been validated in vitro. Does this mean flagellin is required for NLRC4 activation but ExoU suppresses it? Why is that so?

7. Figure 3A – are these capase-1 single KO or Casp1/11 DKO? If they are caspase-1/11 DKO neutrophils, NLRC4 will serve as a better control, since Casp11 is known to trigger NETosis.

8. I am very confused by Figure 3. Line 284 ‘murine BMN with PA01, PA01ExoS-, PP34ExoU or PP34EoxU- strains and measured for the presence of NETs using SEM (Fig. 3A)’. However, I can’t seem to find the condition ‘PP34ExoU-‘ in Figure 3A. Did the authors mean PP34ExoUS142A instead? What is PP34ExoU? Does the strain normally express ExoU or is this introduced into the strain? If they naturally express ExoU, labelling it PP34 will suffice. Since the start of Figure 3 is confusing and poorly labelled, it is challenging to provide any useful comments for the rest of Figure 3.

9. The authors are proposing that neutrophil caspase-1 function is detrimental for host defence when infected with pyroptosis-inducing Pseudomonas, but offers no mechanistic insights into this observation.

10. I recommend to pool data from different experiments to increase the robustness of the study

Minor points

1. Neutrophils are only resistant to caspase-1 but not caspase-11-driven pyroptosis. For clarity and accuracy, this should be changed in the abstract, summary and introduction.

2. I am not sure if the requirement for GSDMD in ROS-driven NETosis still stands, given that a recent article from Dixit’s lab showed that LDC7559 inhibits ROS instead of GSDMD (PMID: 34320407). This should be clarified in the introduction.

3. Reference 30 suggest neutrophil undergo NLRP3 activation and NETosis during SARS-CoV-2 infection, not sterile inflammation.

4. Line 265 typo – Figure 2E not 3E

5. Line 272 and 276 typo – Fig 2F not 2D

6. There are a lot more typo mistakes in the manuscript, please fix them

7. If PP34ExoU is used for most parts of the in vivo characterisation, the ability for them to trigger pyroptosis should be moved to the main figure, not the supplementary.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: Abstract: The authors mention arms race in the abstract but never again- please remove as there is no data supporting a role for this phenomenon in the host microbe arms race.

The data presented do not show that Pad4 gets activated by GSDMD as stated in the abstract, please rephrase

Introduction: Line 149: Data by Rauch et al 2016 suggest Pseudomonas also activates the Naip6-Nlrc4 inflammasome

Statistics: T- test does not seem the appropriate test for several of these experiments, where multiple groups are being compared.

Figure legends: sometimes the authors state in the figure legends: one experiment performed three times. I assume they mean “one experiment representative of three independent experiments” please clarify

Editorial:

Multiple places in manuscript: It is spelled Hoechst dye.

Line 165: I don’t believe WT humans is an appropriate term

205-209: Salmonella infection is referenced in 1B but not shown? Please show the data or remove in the text

214-215 Flagellin is not a toxin please rephrase

220-223: The last panel in 1C suggests, other than discussed in the text, that Flagellin is the sole inflammasome activator as the difference between WT and Casp1 is lost in the FliC- strain. A phenotype in the T3SS system deficient strain can be explained that without the secretion system, no flagellin will leak into the cytosol

246: there is still a significant difference between infected and uninfected Casp1-/- at later timepoints in S1D:, so please rephrase line “in a fully Caspase-1 and GSDMD-dependent manner.” to a more appropriate statement

Line 265: reference to fig3E I believe this reference S2C?

Line 272: refence to 2F instead of 2D

Line 304: “neither PAO1ExoS- nor PP34ExoU- induced Histone release” As far as I can tell there is no ExoU- data shown in these figures, do the authors mean ExoUS142A?

Line 319 “Histone3-Citrullination in a NLRC4-, GSDMD- and CASP-1-dependent manner “- there is still H3-Cit bands visible in S3E in Gsdmd and Nlrc4-knockouts, just weaker, and no Casp1 data is shown, please rephrase ethe statement to reflect that

320: Human blood neutrophils not in S3C but D

370-73: Figures 4D+G: IL-1 levels in the lungs of these mice could just be decreased because of lower bacterial levels, please discuss that in the description of the data.

374-75: The claim about spread not valid based on the data shown as the authors only examine lung tissue but not spread to other organs, please remove.

Figure 1C: please label the X-axis (I assume its minutes)

Figure 3: PAD4 has been shown to be required for NETosis in papers the author cite- so the figure title "Caspase-1-induced neutrophil pyroptosis promotes PAD4-dependent incomplete NETosis" is misleading as it suggests that pAD4 is causing incomplete NETosis, which is not what the authors show

Discussion: Please discuss why PAD4 in this system would lead to only H3 citrunilation but not NETosis as observed by others.

Please discuss the absence of a Caspase-11 phenotype with this bacterium

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Vincent T Lee, David Skurnik

1 Jun 2022

Dear Dr. Meunier,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Caspase-1-driven neutrophil pyroptosis and its role in host susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Vincent T Lee

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

David Skurnik

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Congratulations and thank you for thoughtfully addressing the reviewers concerns. There are some minor comments/suggestions from one of the reviewer. Please address these accordingly.

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: I want to thank the authors for addressing my points thoroughly and want to congratulate them on an extensive revision that improved the manuscript significantly.

Reviewer #2: The authors have fully addressed all of my concerns. I congratulate the authors on a very nice piece of work.

However, I do have a few suggestions (text changes) to improve the clarity of the manuscript, listed below.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors mentioned this is their abstract and introduction 'Notably, deletion of Exotoxins U or S in P. aeruginosa entirely rerouted neutrophil death to Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis, suggesting that these exotoxins interfere with this pathway.' This statement is inaccurate in my opinion, as PA01 is already capable of inducing pyroptosis, therefore, there is no re-routing. Rather, deletion of ExoU/S increased or enhanced caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis.

The authors also mentioned 'sterile pyroptosis' a couple of times in their results and discussion. I believe sterile inflammation/pyroptosis occurs in the absence of an infection, therefore, I suggest the authors to remove/replace this word.

Line 284-285: These experiments showed that the P. aeruginosa PP34 strain potently induces lysis of Casp1-/- or GsdmD-/- neutrophils (Fig. 1F, S1E Fig.). This sentence is also quite confusing. Do the authors mean ' PP34 induce caspase-1 and gsdmd-independent pyroptosis' instead?

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Vincent T Lee, David Skurnik

14 Jul 2022

Dear Dr. Meunier,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Caspase-1-driven neutrophil pyroptosis and its role in host susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. List and reference of Reagents and Tools available.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Movie. Time Lapse Fluorescence microscopy of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with PP34 (NETotic strain, MOI 2) for 9 hours (540 minutes).

    Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in yellow (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining); plasma membrane permeabilization is stained in red (cell impermanent DNA dye Propidium Iodide, PI).

    (AVI)

    S2 Movie. Time Lapse Fluorescence microscopy of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with PP34S142 (Pyroptotic strain, MOI 2) for 9 hours (540 minutes).

    Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in yellow (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining); plasma membrane permeabilization is stained in red (cell impermanent DNA dye Propidium Iodide, PI).

    (AVI)

    S3 Movie. 3D reconstruction and projection of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with P. aeruginosa NETotic strain PP34 (MOI 2) for 3 hours.

    Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in red (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining).

    (MP4)

    S4 Movie. 3D reconstruction and projection of ASC-Citrine murine BMNs infected with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PP34 ExoUS142 (MOI 2) for 3 hours.

    Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in red (ASC-Citrine); plasma membrane is in green (WGA staining).

    (MP4)

    S5 Movie. Intravital microscopy visualization of granulocyte death in MRP8-GFP+ mice infected with 2.5.105 CFUs of PP34 (NETosis-inducing strains) or PP34ExoUS142A (pyroptosis-inducing strain) in presence of SYTOX Blue for 10 hours.

    Granulocyte death was observed in infected lungs by the appearance of SYTOX blue fluorescence. Pseudo colors represent vessels (gray, mTG); Granulocytes (Green, MRP8-GFP+); Dead cells (Purple, SYTOX blue). Scale bar: 20μm.

    (MP4)

    S1 Fig. Multiple P. aeruginosa strains trigger Caspase-1-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils.

    A. Measure of basal cell lysis (release of LDH) in WT and Casp1-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) in culture for the indicated times. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. B. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or Casp1-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and its isogenic mutants lacking T3SS expression (PAO1ΔExsA), Flagellin (PAO1ΔFliC) or T3SS-derived toxins ExoS, ExoY, ExoT (PAO1ΔExoS, PAO1ΔExoY, PAO1ΔExoT) at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. C. Measure of bacterial uptake (Colony-forming Units, CFUs) in WT or Casp1-/- BMNs infected for 45 minutes with Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and its isogenic mutants lacking Flagellin (PAO1ΔFliC), Flagellin motors MotABCD (PAO1ΔMotABCD) or both Flagellin and Flagellin motors MotABCD (PAO1ΔFliC/ΔMotABCD) at a MOI of 10. Here, due to their lack of motility, bacteria were centrifuged for 5 min/1000 rpm to ensure neutrophil/bacterial contact. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graph show one experiment representative of three independent experiments. D. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT and Casp1-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for the indicated times with PAO1ΔMotABCD or PAO1ΔFliC/ΔMotABCD at an MOI of 10. Here, due to their lack of motility, bacteria were centrifuged for 5 min/1000 rpm to ensure neutrophil/bacterial contact. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. E. Measure of the percentage of cells with plasma membrane permeabilization over time using SYTOX Green incorporation in murine WT and Casp1-/- BMNs infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant invalidated for ExoU catalytic activity PP34ExoUS142A at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. F. Measure of the percentage of cells with plasma membrane permeabilization over time using SYTOX Green incorporation in human blood neutrophils BMNs infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutant invalidated for ExoU catalytic activity PP34ExoUS142A at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 in presence/absence of various Caspase inhibitors, Z-YVAD (Casp1 inhibitor, 20μM), Z-DEVD (Casp3/7 inhibitor, 20μM), Z-IETD (Casp8 inhibitor, 20μM). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. P. aeruginosa triggers NLRC4-dependent pyroptosis in neutrophils.

    A. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) in WT, Casp1-/-, Casp1-/-, Casp11-/-, Casp1-/-Casp11-/-, Nlrp3-/-, AIM2-/—, Nlrc4-/- and ASC-/- murine Bone Marrow Neutrophils (BMNs) infected for 3 hours with Pseudomonas aeruginosa pyroptotic strains PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) and PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. B. Gating strategy used to evaluate inflammasome activation in neutrophils was performed as follow: (i) a gate was set on cells in focus [Cells in Focus] and (ii) a sub-gate was created on single cells [Single Cells]. Then we gated first on (iii) LY6G+ Neutrophils [LY6G+] and second on (iv) ASC-citrine+ and Hoechst+ cells [Hoechst+/ASC-Citrine+] within LY6G+ population. (v) To distinguish cells with active (ASC-speck) versus inactive inflammasome (Diffuse ASC), we plotted the Intensity with the area of ASC-citrine. This strategy allow to distinguish cells with active inflammasome that were visualized and quantified.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. NLRC4-dependent neutrophil pyroptosis associates to DNA decondensation.

    A. Confocal microscopy observations and quantification of primary human blood neutrophils infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) and harboring ASC complexes, decondensed DNA and plasma membrane. Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; ASC is in Red (anti-ASC); Plasma membrane is in grey (WGA). Scale bar 10μm. Images are representative of one experiment performed three times with at least 6–10 fields neutrophils observed/ quantified for ASC specks ratios. ***p ≤ 0.001, T-test with Bonferroni correction. B. Immunoblotting observation of Histone 3, HMGB1, Lamin B1, GAPDH, Actin, Gasdermin D (GSDMD) and NLRC4 in cellular soluble and insoluble fractions as well as in the supernatant from WT and Nlrc4-/- murine BMNs infected with P. aeruginosa NETotic strain PP34 or pyroptotic strain PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) for 3 hours. Immunoblots show one experiment performed two times. C. Overview of the different steps induced in neutrophils during NLRC4 inflammasome activation by various Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Inflammasome signalling induce neutrophil DNA decondensation through Calcium-dependent, but cell lysis-independent, manner.

    A. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of human blood neutrophils infected for 3 hours with PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10) or PP34ExoUS142A (MOI 2) in presence/absence of Caspase-1 inhibitor Z-YVAD (20μM) and harboring Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit), decondensed DNA and nuclear membrane (LaminB1). Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Citrullinated Histone-3 is in red (anti H3-Cit); plasma membrane is in grey (WGA staining). Scale bar 10μm. Images are representative of one experiment performed three times with at least 150 neutrophils observed/ experiment. B. Immunoblotting of Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3Cit), total Histone 3 and preformed and cleaved Gasdermin-D (p55/p30) in WT, Nlrc4-/- and GsdmD-/- BMNs treated with Ionomycin (10μM, 3 hours) or infected for 3 hours with PAO1, PAO1ΔExoS, PAO1ExsA- (MOI 10) or with PP34, PP34ΔExoU (MOI 2). Immunoblots show combined lysates and supernatants from one experiment performed three times. C. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of WT and GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PAO1ExoUS142A (MOI 2) in presence/absence of EGTA (10mM) and harboring Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit) and decondensed DNA. Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Histone-3 Citrullination is in red (Anti-H3Cit staining). For quantifications, the percentage of cells positives for H3Cit (H3-Cit+) and decondensed DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for H3Cit and decondensed DNA over the total amount of cells. At least 6 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. D. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with PP34ExoUS142A (MOI2) or PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10) in presence/absence of EGTA (10mM). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments. E. Confocal microscopy observations and quantifications of WT and GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with P. aeruginosa pyroptotic strain PAO1ExoUS142A (MOI 2) in presence/absence of Glycine (5mM) and harboring Citrullinated Histone 3 (H3-Cit) and decondensed DNA. Nucleus (blue) was stained with Hoechst; Histone-3 Citrullination is in red (Anti-H3Cit staining). For quantifications, the percentage of cells positives for H3Cit (H3-Cit+) and decondensed DNA was determined by quantifying the ratios of cells positives for H3Cit and decondensed DNA over the total amount of cells. At least 6 fields from n = 3 independent experiments were analyzed. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. F. Measure of cell lysis (release of LDH) and IL-1β release in WT or GsdmD-/- BMNs infected for 3 hours with PP34ExoUS142A (MOI2) or PAO1ΔExoS (MOI 10) in presence/absence of Glycine (5mM). ***p ≤ 0.001, Two-Way Anova with multiple comparisons. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs show combined values from three independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: rebuttal.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES