Abstract
Phytopathogenic fungi are serious threats in the agriculture sector especially in fruit and vegetable production. The use of plant essential oil as antifungal agents has been in practice from many years. Plant essential oils (PEOs) of Cuminum cyminum, Trachyspermum ammi, Azadirachta indica, Syzygium aromaticum, Moringa oleifera, Mentha spicata, Eucalyptus grandis, Allium sativum, and Citrus sinensis were tested against Fusarium oxysporum. Three phase trials consist of lab testing (MIC and MFC), field testing (seed treatment and foliar spray), and computer-aided fungicide design (CAFD). Two concentrations (25 and 50 μl/ml) have been used to asses MIC while MFC was assessed at four concentrations (25, 50, 75, and 100 μl/ml). C. sinensis showed the largest inhibition zone (47.5 and 46.3 m2) for both concentrations. The lowest disease incidence and disease severity were recorded in treatments with C. sinensis PEO. Citrus sinensis that qualified in laboratory and field trials was selected for CAFD. The chemical compounds of C. sinensis PEO were docked with polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain of F. oxysporum by AutoDock Vina. The best docked complex was formed by nootkatone with -6.0 kcal/mol binding affinity. Pharmacophore of the top seven C. sinensis PEO compounds was used for merged pharmacophore generation. The best pharmacophore model with 0.8492 score was screened against the CMNP database. Top hit compounds from screening were selected and docked with polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain. Four compounds with the highest binding affinity and hydrogen bonding were selected for confirmation of lead molecule by doing MD simulation. The polyketide synthase-CMNPD24498 showed the highest stability throughout 80 ns run of MD simulation. CMNPD24498 (FW054-1) from Verrucosispora was selected as the lead compound against F. oxysporum.
1. Introduction
The secondary metabolites produced by plants play an important role in plant defense mechanism [1]. Most of the plant essential oils (PEOs) are secondary metabolites and found to be involved in plant defense system as antioxidant, antifungal, or antimicrobial [2]. Very large contribution of the PEOs has been reported in traditional medicine manufacturing for the last many decades [3]. PEOs have been commercially used in pharmaceutical, cosmetics, and beverage industry [4].
The need for use of biological agents in pest management has evolved due to irreversible and drastic effects of synthetic pesticides in the environment and human health [4]. The conventional biological pest control agents are parasitoid, predators, microbe, and fungi, but PEOs have also been assigned in this category because of their origin as plant secondary metabolites. They have become popular as an integral part of integrated pest management (IPM) because of the antimicrobial, antioxidant, and antifungal properties [5]. The antimicrobial properties of PEOs are rendered by their terpenoid and phenol constituents [6]. These compounds have been found safe for humans, animals, and environment, when used in food medicines and pesticides [7]. The use of PEOs, as a substitute of synthetic chemicals, has been recommended in the European Union directive vide 2009/128/CE [8].
More than 30% of the crops, from sowing till harvesting even in stored conditions, are caused by phytopathogenic fungi [9]. Various chemical products have been in use for controlling fungal plant disease. But the use of PEOs as an antifungal agent is getting popular in crop protection sector from the last two decades [10]. The in vitro assay of PEO can be performed by using various parameters. The efficacy of PEOs against phytopathogenic fungi can be tested in laboratory by evaluating, as lethal concentration (LC50), minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) [11].
The genus Citrus of Rutaceae family includes about seventeen species distributed throughout the tropical and temperate regions [12]. Its fruit is used as deserts, and the unique aroma of this plant is due to its essential oils present in the leaf, peel, and bark [13]. Various investigations reveal the antimicrobial, antifungal, antioxidant, and radical-scavenging properties of the biological active molecules found in these PEOs [14]. The essential oils from Citrus limon and Citrus aurantifolia have been reported as strong inhibiter of phytopathogenic fungi growth in different crops [15].
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), belonging to the family Solanaceae, is an important crop grown worldwide. It is an important crop of summer and usually regarded as the pole of kitchen gardening, used in sauces and different food stuff compositions [16]. Tomato cultivation is affected by various kinds of pathogenic disease caused by viruses, fungi, bacteria, and mycoplasma. Various kinds of fungal diseases are responsible for affecting the tomato production worldwide which are early blight of tomato, late blight of tomato, and tomato wilt disease. According to an estimate, late blight and early blight of tomato are responsible for almost 49-91% yield losses in Pakistan [17].
Fusarium wilt is a soil-borne fungal disease of solanaceous plant caused by Fusarium oxysporum fungus. Fusarium wilt is very common in tropical southern areas during warm-to-hot weather [18]. Pathogen blocks the xylem vessels due to which plant wilts and dies off. Fungal pathogens can cause 80% of plant diseases [19]. Since antiquity, F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, as with all phytopathogenic fungus, has posed a hazard to agriculture [20]. Chemical fungicides, while commonly employed, are costly and polluting and provide a danger of toxicity to the planters and hence do not form a crop management technique for long-term development [21].
The use of computational approaches, of computer-aided drug design (CADD), is getting popular in pesticide development research and industry from the end of the last decade [22]. The increasing rate of pesticide resistance development, human health hazards, and environment pollution by synthetic pesticides tends to an urge of development of novel effective and safe molecules for agricultural industry. The pesticide development in the wet labs is a tedious expensive and time-consuming job. The pipeline of techniques used in CADD is based on the initial screening of chemical compounds which leads to narrowing down the dataset consisting of the effective and potential molecules [22]. This regime changes in pesticide development from conventional methods to combining with computational technology have been proved a progressive trend [23]. These fast and smart strategies of computer-aided pesticide design (CAPD) can be useful in lead molecule identification. To avert the emergence of pesticide resistance, CADD techniques deliver baseline knowledge regarding potentially safer pesticide compounds and their target site [8].
The currently planned study was targeted to detect in vitro antimicrobial effectiveness of five medicinal PEOs against Fusarium oxysporum. In the first step of the study, MIC and minimum fungicidal concentrations were evaluated for ten essential oils against F. oxysporum. Secondly, three PEOs showing good results in the first step were tested as foliar application and seed treatment; lastly, one of the qualified essential oils was used for computer-aided fungicide design. In the current study, we not only have identified a new, safe, and effective antifungal molecule against F. oxysporum but also new target site. This can become helpful in pesticide resistance management due to target site insensitivity. These findings are recommended to be confirmed in wet lab experiment and can be used in novel, safer, and effective fungicide against F. oxysporum.
2. Materials and Methods
The seeds (Allium sativum, Trachyspermum ammi, Cuminum cyminum, and Syzygium aromaticum), peel (Citrus sinensis), and leaves (Azadirachta indica, Moringa oleifera, Mentha spicata, and Eucalyptus grandis) of nine plants were collected locally for PEO extraction. The PEO extraction was done by following methods described. The extracted PEOs, following methods recommended by Odak et al. [24], were stored at room temperature. The fungal culture of F. oxysporum used in the experiment was provided by the PCSIR, Lahore (Pakistan). The fungus was subcultured at room temperature (25°C) for 120 hours using potato dextrose agar (PDA) slants to prepare spore suspension for subsequent experimental use.
2.1. Laboratory Evaluation of Plant Essential Oil Activity
2.1.1. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC) Evaluation of Plant Essential Oils
The agar well diffusion method was used to evaluate MIC for two concentrations (25 and 50 μl/ml) of PEOs. The size of inhibition zone produced by PEO application reflects the inhibitory concentration of the PEO. The lowest concentration of essential oil producing the largest inhibition zone reflects it potential to inhibit fungal growth, and this concentration is referred as the MIC. Each treatment was replicated three times in CRD experiment layout.
The test tubes containing culture media broth and essential oil (at three concentrations 50, 75, and 100 μl/ml) to be tested were inoculated with 1 × 106 cfu/ml fungal spore load. Broth tubes used without essential oils were assigned control. The fungal growth was observed in test tubes 48 hours after incubation at 25°C. A volume of 100 μl, from tubes showing no visible fungal growth, along with agar was poured in petri plates after the incubation duration. The lowest PEO concentration showing no fungal growth in petri plates, after 48 hours of incubation, was considered as MFC.
2.2. Field Trials
2.2.1. Foliar Application of Plant Essential Oils
Two concentrations, 60 and 80 μl/ml, of E. grandis, C. cyminum, and C. sinensis PEO were selected to be applied as foliar spray in the field experiment. Treatments (Supplementary Table1) were planned under completely randomized design with three replications. A fungal spore load of 106 cfu/ml was inoculated in soil as pathogen inoculum at 15 days posttransplant stage. The foliar applications of PEOs were done four times with 15 days interval.
(1) Data Recording.
Percent disease incidence: the plants showing symptoms of Fusarium wilt were counted to record percent disease incidence using following formula [25]
| (1) |
(2) Percent disease severity: a scale of 0-5 was kept as standard to calculate the disease severity as suggested by Rahman et al. [26]. A standard formula by Chester [27] was followed for the determination of percent disease index (PDI)
| (2) |
Percent disease severity (PDS) was calculated to assign the disease severity scales/ratings to the treatment. Ten infected leaves were randomly selected from ten infected plants each. Total leaf area was measured by using regression equation (R2, 98) developed by Blanco and Folegatti [28].
| (3) |
Percent disease severity (PDS) for each treatment was calculated as under, by observing and measuring the infected leaf area [29].
| (4) |
The following formula was used to calculate percent efficacy of disease control (PEDC) of each treatment [30].
| (5) |
2.2.2. Tomato Seed Treatment
Twenty preinoculated seeds were treated with 1 ml of 60 μl/ml concentration of PEOs (C. sinensis, E. grandis, and C. cyminum). Treatments with fungicide and sterile distilled water served as controls. The experiment was performed using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with five treatments and three replications (Supplementary Table 2).
Land preparation and agronomic field practices were done as directed by the Punjab Agriculture Department, Pakistan. A fungal spore load of 106 cfu/ml was inoculated in soil as pathogen inoculum at 15 days posttransplant stage.
(1) Data Recording and Analysis. The data for PDI and PDS were recorded fortnightly as mentioned in foliar application experiment. Fruit was harvested and weighed from randomly selected ten plants for each treatment. Plant height was recorded from randomly selected 10 plants from each treatment. Fruit parameters, fruit weight, pericarp thickness, and fruit volume of randomly selected 20 fruits from each treatment were recorded. Fruit volume was measured by using the regression equation (R2, 98) developed by Concha-Meyer et al. [31] as
| (6) |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done to find significant difference among treatments. Multiple comparison among the treatments to find statistical differences or similarities among the treatments was done by using Tukey's HSD test.
2.3. Computer-Aided Fungicide Designing (CAFD)
Laboratory- and field test-qualified essential oil was selected for identification of potential lead molecule against F. oxysporum.
The chemical compounds of essential oil of orange Citrus sinensis L. were retrieved from literature, and their structure were retrieved from PubChem (Supplementary Table 3). The pesticide likeness [32] and nontoxicity of the compounds were predicted by DruLiTo 2.0 and DataWarior. The qualified compounds were selected for further use in docking.
2.3.1. Protein 3D Structure Prediction and Molecular Docking
The amino acid sequence of polyketide synthase, an important toxin-producing enzyme in F. oxysporum [33], was retrieved from UniProt (UniProt ID: A0A0D2YG10). The toxin-producing domain of enzyme was predicted by InterPro-EMBL-EBI. Three-dimensional structure/model of the selected domain was predicted by using online server Robetta. The predicted 3D model was refined by an online available server GalaxyWEB, and the refined structure was evaluated by SAVES server.
The molecular docking of polyketide synthase domain and selected C. sinensis PEO compounds/ligands was done by using AutoDock Vina.
2.3.2. Pharmacophore Modeling and Virtual Screening
The docked ligand-receptor complexes showing lower binding energies and hydrogen bond interaction were selected to be imported, as training set, to Ligand Scout 4.4 for pharmacophore generation. The best pharmacophore model was selected for virtual screening against Comprehensive Marine Natural Products Database (CMNPD). The matching compounds were evaluated and screened as in the first docking.
2.3.3. Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations
Four protein-ligand docked complexes having lower binding energy were used for MD simulation. The software package, Amber v18, was used for MD simulations at 80-nanosecond time period.
3. Results
3.1. Laboratory Evaluation of Essential Oil Activity
3.1.1. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Fungicidal Concentration (MFC) Evaluation of Plant Essential Oils
The significantly largest but not significantly different from each other inhibition zone, 47.5 and 46.3 mm, was recorded for C. sinensis 50 μl/ml and C. sinensis 25 μl/ml, respectively (Figure 1). No fungal colony growth after 72 hours was observed in A. sativum 100 μl/ml, E. grandis 75 μl/ml, C. cyminum 75 μl/ml, and C. sinensis 50 μl/ml treatments (Figure 2).
Figure 1.

Minimum inhibitory concentration of different concentrations of plant essential oils against Fusarium oxysporum.
Figure 2.

Minimum fungicidal concentration activity of different plant essential oils against Fusarium oxysporum.
3.2. Field Trials
3.2.1. Foliar Application of Plant Essential Oils
(1) Percent Disease Incidence. The percent disease incidence after the first application was significantly the lowest for the plant essential of C. sinensis; 80 μl/ml showed significantly the lowest (2.2) percent disease incidence (Figure 3). In the mean percent disease incidence after four applications of essential oil, only C. sinensis 80 μl/ml showed the significantly lowest (1.9) percent disease incidence. A not significantly different percent disease incidence was observed among the rest of the treatments. A not significantly different trend of disease incidence was observed among different application intervals.
Figure 3.

Effect of foliar application of different concentrations of plant essential oils on percent disease incidence of Fusarium oxysporum in tomato.
(2) Percent Disease Severity. The data for percent disease severity were recorded two times after PEO application, i.e., after the first and fourth applications (Table 1). The significantly lowest percent disease severity (3.1), after the first PEO application, was recorded for C. sinensis (80 μl/ml), which was not significantly different from those for C. sinensis 60 μl/ml, E. grandis (80 μl/ml), and Ridomil Gold. Two treatments (C. sinensis 80 μl/ml and C. sinensis 60 μl/ml) fell in class 1 of disease severity scale with PEDC value 80 and PDI 20. A similar trend for percent disease severity was observed after application.
Table 1.
Effect of foliar application of different concentrations of plant essential oils on percent disease severity of Fusarium oxysporum in tomato.
| No. | Plant essential oil concentrations(μl/ml) | Total leaf area (cm2) | Infested leaf area (cm2) | PDS∗∗ | Infested leaf area (cm2) | PDS∗∗ | Reduction | DSS∗∗∗ | PDI∗∗∗∗ | PEDC∗∗∗∗∗ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | Eucalyptus grandis (80) | 23.2 | 1.5 | 5.7 ± 0.01cd∗ | 0.9 | 3.7 ± 0.02c∗ | 2.6 | 2-1 | 40-20 | 60-80 |
| T2 | Eucalyptus grandis (60) | 22.7 | 1.3 | 6.5 ± 0.01c | 0.9 | 3.9 ± 0.02c | 2.0 | 2-1 | 40-20 | 60-80 |
| T3 | Cuminum cyminum (80) | 23.1 | 2.3 | 10.0 ± 0.03b | 2.6 | 11.3 ± 0.03b | -1.3 | 3-4 | 20 | 80 |
| T4 | Cuminum cyminum (60) | 23.3 | 3.0 | 12.9 ± 0.01b | 2.8 | 12.0 ± 0.02b | 0.9 | 4 | 60 | 40 |
| T5 | Citrus sinensis (80) | 22.6 | 0.7 | 3.1 ± 0.01d | 0.6 | 2.7 ± 0.01d | 0.4 | 1 | 20 | 80 |
| T6 | Citrus sinensis (60) | 22.6 | 1.0 | 4.4 ± 0.02cd | 0.8 | 3.5 ± 0.02cd | -1.8 | 1 | 20 | 80 |
| T7 | Ridomil Gold WG | 22.8 | 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.02d | 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.03de | 0.7 | 1 | 20 | 80 |
| T8 | Ethanol | 23.1 | 17.0 | 73.6 ± 0.00a | 16.0 | 69.3 ± 0.02a | 4.3 | 5 | 100 | 0 |
| LSD | 1.505 | 1.812 |
∗Values sharing the same letters in column are not significantly different. ∗∗Percent disease severity. ∗∗∗Disease severity scale. ∗∗∗∗Percent disease index. ∗∗∗∗∗∗Percent efficacy of disease control.
3.2.2. Tomato Seed Treatment
The efficacy of essential oil was tested as seed treatment. As the PEOs are volatile in nature, it might be possible that they act more effectively as seed treatment than foliar spray application [34].
(1) Percent Disease Severity and Percent Disease Incidence. The data were recorded from ten randomly selected plants (Table 2). All the three treatment effects on disease severity scale fell in class 1. The lowest (2.11) percent disease severity, not significantly different from that by E. grandis, was recorded for C. sinensis. Both treatments fell in DSS class 1, while percent disease incidence was significantly the lowest (1.5) for C. sinensis.
Table 2.
Effect of seed treatment of different plant essential oils on percent disease severity of Fusarium oxysporum in tomato.
| No. | Plant essential oils (60 μl/ml) | Total leaf area (cm2) | Infected area (cm2) | PDS∗∗ | DSS∗∗∗ | PDI∗∗∗∗ | PECD∗∗∗∗∗ | %incidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eucalyptus grandis | 22.0 | 1.1 | 3.64 ± 0.1cd∗ | 1 | 40 | 60 | 2.6.±0.1c |
| 2 | Cuminum cyminum | 21.7 | 2.7 | 12.44 ± 0.0b | 3 | 60 | 40 | 4.5 ± 0.2b |
| 3 | Citrus sinensis | 21.6 | 0.8 | 2.11 ± 0.3d | 1 | 20 | 80 | 1.5 ± 0.2d |
| 4 | Ridomil Gold WG | 22.0 | 0.3 | 1.36 ± 0.1d | 1 | 20 | 80 | 1.0 ± 0.2d |
| 5 | Distilled water | 23.0 | 19.0 | 82.61 ± 0.1a | 5 | 100 | 0 | 9.6 ± 0.0a |
| LSD | 1.8725 | 0.4245 |
∗Values sharing the same letters in column are not significantly different. ∗∗Percent disease severity. ∗∗∗Disease severity scale. ∗∗∗∗Percent disease index. ∗∗∗∗∗∗Percent efficacy of disease control.
(2) Effect of Seed Treatment on Yield, Plant Height, and Fruit Characteristics of Tomato. The significantly highest fruit yield per plant (3.8 kg) was harvested from the plants treated with C. sinensis oil (Figure 4). The fruit yield per plant was not significantly different among the treatments E. grandis and C. cyminum. Plant height was significantly the highest for C. sinensis. The significantly highest value (59.4 m3) for fruit volume was recorded in plants treated with C. sinensis PEO.
Figure 4.

Tomato plant phenotypic response to the seed treatment by plant essential oils.
3.3. Computer-Aided Fungicide Design (CAFD)
3.3.1. Chemical Compound Structure Acquisition and Screening
Only thirty-three compounds were qualified to have pesticide likeness and nonhazardous for humans (Supplementary Table 4). Active domain beta-ketoacyl synthase (IPR020841) of polyketide synthase was selected from domain scanning results. The refined 3D model passed the quality checks and was saved for further analysis (Figure 5(a)). The overall Ramachandran score of the refined 3D model of domain was 98.4% (Figure 5(b)). Among which, 89.4% amino acid residues were found in the most favored region while only 9% residues lied in the additional allowed region. ERRAT quality factor was 85.803 Figure 5(c). The residues passed the verification 3D check with 90.40% residues having averaged 3D-1D score ≥ 0.2Figure 5(d).
Figure 5.

Refined 3D model of polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain in Fusarium oxysporum and model evaluation results: (a) refined 3D model, (b) Ramachandran plot, (c) ERRAT score, and (d) verify 3D score.
3.3.2. Molecular Docking
Only sixteen compounds having hydrogen bond donor (HBD)/hydrogen bond acceptor (HBA) sites were selected to perform ligand-receptor docking. The overall binding affinity among docked complexes ranged from -6.2 to -4.3 kcal/mol (Table 3). The highest binding affinity (-6.2) resulted for two compounds: caryophyllene oxide and germacrene. But no hydrogen bond was found in both cases. Only seven ligand molecules showed hydrogen bonding with the protein. One hydrogen bond was formed in six docked complexes while nootkatone formed two hydrogen bonds with -6.0 kcal/mol binding affinity.
Table 3.
Properties of chemical compounds of Citrus sinensis essential oil and results of docking with polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain in Fusarium oxysporum.
| No. | Compounds | PubChem CID | MW (g/mol) | HBD | HBA | nRTB | Logp | BA (kcal/mol) | H-bond |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monoterpenes | |||||||||
| 1 | β-Pinene | 14896 | 136.23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3.1 | -4.3 | 0 |
| 2 | β-Myrcene | 31253 | 142.27 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4.3 | -3.8 | 0 |
| 3 | Limonene | 22311 | 136.23 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3.4 | -5.8 | 0 |
| 4 | Sabinene | 18818 | 136.23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3.1 | -4.8 | 0 |
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | |||||||||
| 5 | α-Terpineol | 17100 | 154.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1.8 | -4.7 | 1 |
| 6 | (Z)-p-Menth-2-en-1-ol | 13918681 | 154.25 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.3 | -6.1 | 1 |
| 7 | Neral | 643779 | 152.23 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 3.0 | -5.9 | 1 |
| Sesquiterpenes | |||||||||
| 8 | δ-Cadinene | 92313 | 204.35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.3 | -5.7 | 0 |
| 9 | β-Farnesene | 5281517 | 204.35 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 6.2 | -5.0 | 0 |
| 10 | α-Cyperone | 6452086 | 218.33 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.8 | -5.8 | 0 |
| 11 | Caryophyllene oxide | 1742210 | 220.35 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.6 | -6.2 | 0 |
| 12 | Germacrene B | 5281519 | 204.35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4.7 | -6.2 | 0 |
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | |||||||||
| 13 | Elemol | 92138 | 222.37 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4.4 | -5.3 | 1 |
| 14 | Nootkatone | 1268142 | 218.33 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3.9 | -6.0 | 2 |
| Other oxygenated compounds | |||||||||
| 15 | Citronellyl acetate | 9017 | 198.3 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 3.8 | -4.8 | 1 |
| 16 | Neryl acetate | 1549025 | 196.29 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 3.5 | -4.5 | 1 |
MW = molecular weight; HBD = hydrogen bond donor; HBA = hydrogen bond acceptor; nRTB = number of rotatable bonds; BA = binding affinity.
3.3.3. Pharmacophore Modeling, Virtual Screening, and Molecular Docking
Seven chemical compounds showing low binding energies and hydrogen bond interaction, α-terpineol, (Z)-p-menth-2-en-1-ol, neral, elemol, nootkatone, and citronellyl acetate, were selected for merged feature pharmacophore generation. The best pharmacophore model (score: 0.8492) was selected for virtual screening. The selected pharmacophore had two HBA, two HBD, three hydrophobic hydrogens, and one aromatic ring (Figure 6). The hit rate 20.35% was obtained in virtual screening of the pharmacophore against CMNPD. Only 27 compounds, after screening, were qualified to be docked against query protein. The binding affinity of ligand-protein docked complex ranged from -6.9 to -4.1 (Table 4).
Figure 6.

Pharmacophore features of selected, polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain in Fusarium oxysporum inhibitor, compounds from Citrus sinensis plant essential oils.
Table 4.
Properties of marine life-derived compounds and results of docking with polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain in Fusarium oxysporum.
| No. | CMNPD ID | IUPAC name | MW (g/mol) | Logp | HBA | HBD | nRB | nAR | BA (kcal/mol) | H-bond | Source species |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 91 | 2-[(1R,2S)-1,2-Dimethyl-3-methylidenecyclopentyl]-5-methylphenol | 195.99 | 3.792 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6.9 | 4 | Laurencia subopposita |
| 2 | 538 | (1S,2R,3R,5R,6R,7R,8R)-5-[(4E)-6-Hydroxy-6-methylhepta1,4-dien-2-yl]-2,8-dimethyltricyclo[5.3.0.02,6]decan-3-ol | 275.01 | 4.488 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | -4.1 | 3 | Stoechospermum polypodioides |
| 3 | 1118 | (3bR,6S,7S,9aR)-7-Hydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-3b,6,9a-trimethyl-4,5,5a,7,9,9b,10,11-octahydronaphtho[2,1-e][2]benzofuran-8-one | 303.98 | 3.25 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6.5 | 2 | Spongia sp. |
| 4 | 2024 | (1Z)-1-[(3S,3aS,7S,7aS)-3,7-Dimethyl-1,2,3,3a,5,6,7,7a-octahydroinden-4-ylidene]-2-methylpropan-2-ol | 198.01 | 4.752 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -5.4 | 1 | Unidentified sp. |
| 5 | 2365 | (1R,2R,4S)-4-Methyl-1-propan-2-yl-3,4-dihydro-2H-naphthalene-1,2,6-triol | 215.98 | 1.167 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -5.1 | 2 | Lemnalia cervicornis |
| 6 | 2924 | 2-[(1R,3E,7E,11E)-4,8,12-Trimethylcyclotetradeca-3,7,11-trien-1-yl]propane-1,2-diol | 271.99 | 4.881 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -5.8 | 2 | Sinularia mayi |
| 7 | 4785 | 3-Hydroxy-3,5,5-trimethyl-7-propan-2-yl-2,4-dihydroinden-1-one | 211.99 | 2.328 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -5.8 | 1 | Sarcophyton trocheliophorum |
| 8 | 5394 | [(1R,2aR,3S,4aR,5R,6S,7R,8R,8aR)-3,6-Dibromo-7-hydroxy-2a,4a,5,8-tetramethyl-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8-octahydrocyclobuta[i]inden-1-yl] acetate | 409.82 | 4.625 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -5.5 | 0 | Laurencia tenera |
| 9 | 15648 | (9Z,11E)-Tricyclo[12.3.1.12,6]nonadeca-1(17),2,4,6(19),9,11,14(18),15-octaene-3,8,17-triol | 275.98 | 2.135 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -6.7 | 0 | Cymodocea nodosa |
| 10 | 15845 | 6,7,9a-Trimethyl-1,3,5,5a,6,8,9,10a-octahydrofuro[3,4-b][1] benzoxepin-7-ol | 227.98 | 1.386 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -5.6 | 0 | Laurencia luzonensis |
| 11 | 18682 | (1S,4R,4aS,8aS)-6-(Hydroxymethyl)-4-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1-methyl-3,4,4a,7,8,8a-hexahydro-2H-naphthalen-1-ol | 230 | 0.841 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -5.7 | 3 | Streptomyces sp. |
| 12 | 19958 | [(1S,3aS,4R,8S,8aR)-8-Ethyl-1,4-dimethyl-3a,5,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-1H-azulen-4-yl] methanol | 198.01 | 4.216 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -6.7 | 1 | Ulva lactuca |
| 13 | 20001 | (1S,3aR,4S,8aS)-1,4-Dimethyl-7-propan-2-yl-2,3,3a,5,6,8a-hexahydroazulene-1,4-diol | 214.01 | 2.613 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -5.5 | 0 | Grateloupia turuturu |
| 14 | 20352 | (1S,3aS,4S,7S)-1,4-Dimethyl-7-propan-2-yl-3,4,5,6-tetrahydro-2H-azulene-1,3a,7-triol | 227.98 | 0.744 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -5.8 | 7 | Sinularia leptoclados |
| 15 | 20360 | (3S,4E,6S,8Z,11S,16R)-6,16-Dihydroxy-8-(hydroxymethyl)-4,15,15-trimethyltricyclo [9.3.1.13,14] hexadeca-1(14),4,8-trien-2-one | 306 | 0.45 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -6.3 | 1 | Cespitularia hypotentaculata |
| 16 | 22108 | (1S,4S,5S,9R)-8-(Hydroxymethyl)-4-(1-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-1-methylspiro [4.5] dec-7-en-9-ol | 228.99 | 2.351 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -5.1 | 5 | Lemnalia cervicornis |
| 17 | 24498 | 2-Hydroxy-3,6-dimethyl-N-(4,5,6-trihydroxy-4-methyloxan-3-yl) benzamide (FW054-1) | 289.97 | 0.733 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | -6.2 | 3 | Verrucosispora sp. |
| 18 | 24574 | [(1S,2S,4E,6R,7E,9R)-1,6-Dihydroxy-8-(hydroxymethyl)-4,11,11-trimethyl-2-bicyclo [7.2.0] undeca-4,7-dienyl] acetate | 284.98 | 0.006 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | -5.6 | 5 | Ascotricha sp. |
| 19 | 26841 | (1R,2S,5R,8R,9R)-1,4,4,8-Tetramethyl-12-oxatricyclo [6.3.1.02,5] dodecan-9-ol | 214.01 | 3.563 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -5.2 | 1 | Rumphella antipathes |
| 20 | 26845 | (3aS,5S,5aR,6S,8S)-5a,6,8-Trihydroxy-3a-methoxy-1,5,8-trimethyl-4,5,6,7-tetrahydroazuleno[6,5-b] furan-2-one | 287.97 | -0.833 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -6.0 | 0 | Menella kanisa |
| 21 | 28987 | 9-Hydroxy-3-(1-hydroxyethyl)-3H-2-benzoxepin-1-one | 207.98 | 0.862 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -5.5 | 4 | Pestalotia heterocornis |
| 22 | 30788 | (1S,2R,3aR,8aS)-1-(2-hydroxypropan-2-yl)-3a,6-Dimethyl-2,3,4,7,8,8a-hexahydroazulene-1,2-diol | 228.99 | 3.074 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -5.7 | 2 | Trichoderma virens |
| 23 | 30789 | (1S,2R,3aR,4R,8aS)-3a,6-Dimethyl-1-propan-2-yl-2,3,4,7,8,8a-hexahydroazulene-1,2,4-triol | 228.99 | 1.947 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -6.2 | 2 | Trichoderma virens |
| 24 | 20359 | (3S,4E,6R,7S,11R,16R)-6,7,16-Trihydroxy-4,15,15-trimethyl-8-methylidenetricyclo [9.3.1.13,14] hexadeca-1(14),4-dien-2-one | 306 | 1.197 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -5.4 | 6 | Cespitularia hypotentaculata |
| 25 | 11537 | [(1S,8aS)-5,5,8a-Trimethyl-2-methylidene-3,4,4a,6,7,8-hexahydro-1H-naphthalen-1-yl] methanol | 195.99 | 3.067 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -5.6 | 0 | Cadlina luteomarginata |
| 26 | 11370 | (1R,3aR,4R,8aR)-1-Methoxy-1,4-dimethyl-7-propan-2-yl-2,3,3a,5,6,8a-hexahydroazulen-4-ol | 226.01 | 3.132 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | -5.8 | 0 | Sarcophyton buitendijki |
| 27 | 5390 | 2-[(1R,3R,4S)-4-Chloro-1,3-dimethylcyclohexyl]-5-methylphenol | 230.96 | 3.789 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -6.7 | 0 | Laurencia dendroidea |
MW = molecular weight; HBD = hydrogen bond donor; HBA = hydrogen bond acceptor; nRTB = number of rotatable bonds; BA = binding affinity; nAR = number of aromatic rings.
3.3.4. Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Four protein-ligand docked complexes with lower binding energy, i.e., beta-ketoacyl synthase-CMNPD91 (-6.9 kcal/mol), beta-ketoacyl synthase-CMNPD19958 (-6.7 kcal/mol), beta-ketoacyl synthase-CMNPD1118 (-6.5 kcal/mol), and beta-ketoacyl synthase-CMNPD24498 (-6.2 kcal/mol), were simulated in an explicit water environment for a total of 80 ns. The beta-ketoacyl synthase-CMNPD24498 (-6.2 kcal/mol) complex showed stable interactions throughout the run. Three hydrogen bonds were found originally in the complex which was retained till 80 ns. At 30, 40, 60, and 70 ns, only one hydrogen bond was observed (Figures 7(a)–7(h)). Phenylalanine was found, most of the time, to be involved in hydrogen bond formation. To test the simulation system reliability, the backbone atom deviation was measured using the RMSD (root-mean-square deviation). In particular, the RMSD result revealed that the graph exhibited a progressive increase starting at 1 Å and oscillating at 2.5 Å to 3.2 Å (Figure 8(a)). A peak 3.7 Å was observed at 45 ns after that started declining and 3.2 Å was recorded at 80 ns, which favors the stability and reliability of the complex. Root-mean-square-fluctuations (RMSF) were calculated in order to understand the fluctuation of individual residue in the docked complex. The results revealed fluctuation peaks for glycine 50, aspartic acid 125, and threonine 275 at 4.8 Å, 4.3 Å, and 4.7 Å, respectively. The high fluctuation in the docked complex residues might be due to the free movement of the residues. Most of the residue in docked protein showed a steady behavior which might indicate the stable interaction with the ligand (Figure 8(b)). B-factor and RMSF are interconvertible and related to each other [35]. The amino acid fluctuations shown by B-factor were similar to RMSF results (Figure 8(c)). The result revealed a very consistent behavior in terms of Rg value between 21.5 and 21.3 Å throughout the MD simulation time (Figure 8(d)).
Figure 7.

(a–h) Three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) interactions of polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain-CMNPD24498 at different time slots during MD simulation.
Figure 8.

MD simulation results of polyketide synthase beta-ketoacyl synthase domain-CMNPD24498 complex.
4. Discussion
The phytopathogenic fungi are a serious threat for agriculture sector worldwide [18]. The indiscriminate use of fungicides especially on vegetable and fruit is very harmful for human health [36]. Moreover, it causes environmental pollution and pesticide resistance but these issues are least addressed for fungicides as compared to insecticides [37, 38]. The use of alternate plant fungal disease management methods is need of time. PEOs are volatile molecules produced by plants as secondary metabolites having antifungal potential [39]. The biodegradable nature of PEOs makes them potential candidate for fungicide development [40].
The effectiveness of PEOs, i.e., Syzygium aromaticum, Azadirachta indica, Mentha spicata, Trachyspermum ammi, Moringa oleifera, Cuminum cyminum, Eucalyptus grandis, Allium sativum, and Citrus sinensis, has been tested, against Fusarium oxysporum, in the present study. The study was conducted in three trials, i.e., laboratory testing of PEO, field evaluation, and computer-aided fungicide design. MIC and MFC of PEOs were evaluated in laboratory. The MIC of a chemical is its lowest concentration required to inhibit the substantial growth of a pathogen [41]. The lowest MIC and MFC against F. oxysporum have been recorded for Citrus sinensis PEO. The second effective PEOs were of E. grandis and A. sativum. Shafique et al. reported good potential of E. grandis against different fungi but least effective against other F. oxysporum [42]. Eucalyptus grandis essential oil was found effective against F. oxysporum and Botrytis cinerea in banana [43]. Antifungal activity of essential oil from A. sativum has been reported from many recent studies [44]. The third runner-up of the treatments was C. cyminum (50 μl/ml). Romagnoli et al. and Mohammadpour et al. reported antifungal potential of C. cyminum [45, 46]. Three qualified PEOs, C. sinensis, C. cyminum, and E. grandis, from lab experiment were selected to be tested on tomato plants in field conditions. Two trials for field testing were carried out, i.e., foliar application of PEO and seed treatment with PEO. In foliar application trial, the lowest percent disease incidence and percent disease severity were observed for C. sinensis followed by E. grandis. Percent disease severity was calculated to find out the PEDC of PEO suggested by Jadon et al. [47]. This parameter is used to test the effectiveness of a chemical against pathogenic disease [45]. PEDC of C. sinensis was found the highest in our study. The efficacy of PEO was found to be more persistent as seed treatment than as foliar application. It might be possible that when exposed to sunlight the essential oil degrades rapidly [48].
CADD became a popular method for developing new pharmaceutical drugs [49]. Nevertheless, while the pharmacodynamics and techniques used in CADD and pesticide design (CAPD) are similar, this technique is not used in agricultural pesticides [50]. In the subject of pesticide chemistry, research into new target locations and innovative pharmacological compounds is quite limited. A little work has been done in CAPD against phytopathogenic fungi control [51]. Novel, more effective, and least toxic drug molecules and new target sites in the pathogen can be identified more efficiently by using CAPD approaches. This may help to overcome the problem of environment pollution, human health hazards, and pesticide resistance issues in a smart, least expensive, and rapid manner.
The target enzyme of F. oxysporum polyketide synthase was selected to be inhibited. It is involved in mediating fusaric acid biosynthesis which is a mycotoxin with low to moderate toxicity to humans and animals but highly phytotoxic [33]. Protein domain is the conserved sequence of protein which controls its function independently [52]. It is better to identify the toxin-producing domain in protein for inhibition by ligand molecules so beta-ketoacyl synthase domain (IPR020841) was selected for inhibition. This domain was found be involved in a number of enzymatic systems, including fatty acid synthetase, which catalyzes the formation of long-chain fatty acids from acetyl-CoA, malonyl-CoA, and NADPH which is involved in the biosynthesis polyketide synthase. Top seven compounds from C. sinensis PEO showing minimum binding energy and good hydrogen bonding with target protein were selected for merging their features to construct the pharmacophore. The pharmacophore defined by IUPAC is “a collection of steric and electronic characteristics that is essential to make sure the optimal supramolecular interactions with a particular biological target and to activate (or block) its biological reaction.” It is generally done by retrieving widely used chemical characteristics from 3D structures of a set of known ligands that are reflective of the ligands' crucial interactions with certain macromolecular targets [53]. This can be used as a query for retrieving potential lead identification from structural databases, for designing molecules with specific desired characteristics [54]. This approach has been effectively used in drug designing from novel and human safe chemical compounds [55]. These common features among the top compounds shown by pharmacophore can be used to design a novel fungicide molecule effective against F. oxysporum.
High-throughput screening (HTS) has become an integral part of CADD procedure pipeline for identification of hits of effective compounds against target protein [56]. The first step of CADD procedure pipeline is the identification of molecular targets (natural or synthetic) for our protein of interest, and after identification and validation, the selected compound is referred as lead molecule. The molecules found in natural products play a highly significant role in the drug discovery and development process. The chemical compounds that originated from marine organisms are getting attention and becoming popular to be selected as drug molecules [57]. In the current study, we did virtual screening of the pharmacophore, against Comprehensive Marine Natural Products Database (CMNPD). This database contains >38000 marine organism-originated chemical compounds.
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to check the stability of docked complexes. This analysis of MD simulation is used to evacuate the movements of the highly complexed macromolecular systems [58]. The estimation of structural fluctuations, in terms of RMSD and RMSF, of docked complex is the most crucial feature of this analysis which reflects the stability and flexibility of the complex. The stability interaction profile is reflected in the RMSD value. The average ligand-receptor RMSD in this investigation was 1 nm, showing that the system was stable. The dislocation of a single atom, or a group of atoms, relative to the reference structure is estimated using RMSF, which is averaged across the number of atoms [59].
The compound CMNPD24498 (FW054-1) has been selected as lead molecule for fungicide development against F. oxysporum. This compound has been derived from Verrucosispora genus of Micromonosporaceae family [60]. Micromonosporaceae belongs to the gram-positive Actinobacteria. This genus is getting attention in the field of drug development due to antibiotic nature of some species [61]. Some important antibiotic products of Verrucosispora sp. are gifhornenolones A and B from Verrucosispora gifhornensis [62], thiocoraline A from Verrucosispora sp. WMMA107, proximicins A-C from Verrucosispora fiedleri MG-37, brevianamide F from Verrucosispora sp. MS100047, and butrepyrazinone from Verrucosispora sp. K51G [63–65].
5. Conclusion
The fungal plant diseases are a very serious threat to fruit and vegetable industry. Complete eradication of disease from plants is required for good market value of fruit and vegetable. Synthetic fungicides are being extensively used for controlling fungal disease. This indiscriminate and extensive use of synthetic chemical compounds causes very serious threat to human health and environment. Alternative and safer pest management methods have been recommended to be tested against phytopathogenic fungi, especially in fruits and vegetables. The use of plant essential oil (PEO) is considered a safe and environment-friendly plant disease control method. In the current study, different plant essential oils have been tested, in the laboratory and field, against F. oxysporum in tomato. The plant essential oil of Citrus sinensis has been found most effective among all the PEOs tested. But the use of plant essential oil on a large scale for plant disease control is not a cost-effective method. The computer-aided fungicide design (CAFD) technique has been employed to identify safer and effective chemical molecules to be used in fungicide development against F. oxysporum. The shared features of the top seven compounds of C. sinensis PEO against toxin-producing enzyme, polyketide synthase, of F. oxysporum were screened against the CMNPD database. One compound CMNPD24498 (FW054-1) from Verrucosispora sp. (bacteria) showed the highest rank of similarity for shared features of selected effective C. sinensis PEO compounds. This biological originated compound fulfilled the pesticide likeness criteria and nontoxic in nature. FW054-1 can be used for the development of an effective and safe fungicide against F. oxysporum.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, for funding this work under grant no. RGP. 2/90/43.
Contributor Information
Qudsia Yousafi, Email: qudsia@cuisahiwal.edu.pk.
Shabana Bibi, Email: shabana.bibi.stmu@gmail.com.
Atul Kabra, Email: atul.kbr@gmail.com.
Data Availability
The authors declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Supplementary Materials
The supplementary file S1 is available online along with the manuscript. Other supplementary material will be provided by the corresponding author on request.
References
- 1.Alqahtani A. S., Ullah R., Shahat A. A. Bioactive constituents and toxicological evaluation of selected antidiabetic medicinal plants of Saudi Arabia. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine . 2022;2022:23. doi: 10.1155/2022/7123521.7123521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ullah R., Alqahtani A. S., Noman O. M. A., Alqahtani A. M., Ibenmoussa S., Bourhia M. A review on ethno-medicinal plants used in traditional medicine in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences . 2020;27(10):2706–2718. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.06.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mussarat S., Amber R., Tariq A., et al. Ethnopharmacological assessment of medicinal plants used against livestock infections by the people living around Indus River. BioMed Research International . 2014;2014:14. doi: 10.1155/2014/616858.616858 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Isman M. B. Bioinsecticides based on plant essential oils: a short overview. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C . 2020;75(7-8):179–182. doi: 10.1515/znc-2020-0038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lamichhane J. R., Dachbrodt-Saaydeh S., Kudsk P., Messéan A. Toward a reduced reliance on conventional pesticides in European agriculture. Plant Disease . 2016;100(1):10–24. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0574-FE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Oussalah M., Caillet S., Saucier L., Lacroix M. Antimicrobial effects of selected plant essential oils on the growth of a Pseudomonas putida strain isolated from meat. Meat Science . 2006;73(2):236–244. doi: 10.1016/J.MEATSCI.2005.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sharififar F., Moshafi M. H., Mansouri S. H., Khodashenas M., Khoshnoodi M. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial and antioxidant activities of the essential oil and methanol extract of endemic Zataria multiflora Boiss. Food Control . 2007;18(7):800–805. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2006.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yousafi Q., Shahzad M. S., Saleem S., et al. Terpinen-4-ol from Trachyspermum ammi is a potential and safer candidate molecule for fungicide development against Alternaria solani. Journal of King Saud University-Science . 2022;34(1):p. 101747. doi: 10.1016/J.JKSUS.2021.101747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jain A., Sarsaiya S., Wu Q., Lu Y., Shi J. A review of plant leaf fungal diseases and its environment speciation. Biosystems Engineering . 2019;10(1):409–424. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2019.1649520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 10.Basak S., Guha P. A review on antifungal activity and mode of action of essential oils and their delivery as nano-sized oil droplets in food system. Journal of Food Science and Technology . 2018;55(12):4701–4710. doi: 10.1007/S13197-018-3394-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Raveau R., Fontaine J., Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui A. Essential oils as potential alternative biocontrol products against plant pathogens and weeds: a review. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) . 2020;9:p. 365. doi: 10.3390/FOODS9030365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alós E., Cercós M., Rodrigo M. J., Zacarías L., Talón M. Regulation of color break in citrus fruits. Changes in pigment profiling and gene expression induced by gibberellins and nitrate, two ripening retardants. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 2006;54(13):4888–4895. doi: 10.1021/JF0606712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tu N. T. M., Thanh L. X., Une A., Ukeda H., Sawamura M. Volatile constituents of Vietnamese pummelo, orange, tangerine and lime peel oils. Fragrance Journal . 2002;17(3):169–174. doi: 10.1002/FFJ.1076. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matasyoh J. C., Kiplimo J. J., Karubiu N. M., Hailstorks T. P. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oil of Tarchonanthus camphoratus. Food Chemistry . 2007;101(3):1183–1187. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2006.03.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuate J., Foko J., Ndindeng S. A., et al. Effect of essential oils from citrus varieties on in vitro growth and sporulation of Phaeoramularia angolensis causing citrus leaf and fruit spot disease. European Journal of Plant Pathology . 2006;114(2):151–161. doi: 10.1007/S10658-005-2928-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ntinas G. K., Kadoglidou K., Tsivelika N., et al. Performance and hydroponic tomato crop quality characteristics in a novel greenhouse using dye-sensitized solar cell technology for covering material. Horticulture . 2019;5(2):42–45. doi: 10.3390/HORTICULTURAE5020042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ayvaz A., Sagdic O., Karaborklu S., Ozturk I. Insecticidal activity of the essential oils from different plants against three stored-product insects. Journal of Insect Science . 2010;10:p. 21. doi: 10.1673/031.010.2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fisher M. C., Henk D. A., Briggs C. J., et al. Emerging fungal threats to animal, plant and ecosystem health. Nature . 2012;484(7393):186–194. doi: 10.1038/nature10947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bacon C. W., Glenn A. E., Yates I. E. Fusarium verticillioides: managing the endophytic association with maize for reduced fumonisins accumulation. Toxin Reviews . 2008;27:411–446. doi: 10.1080/15569540802497889. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Anand G., Waiger D., Vital N., Maman J., Ma L. J., Covo S. How does Fusarium oxysporum sense and respond to nicotinaldehyde, an inhibitor of the NAD+ salvage biosynthesis pathway? Frontiers in Microbiology . 2019;10:p. 329. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Keswani C., Mishra S., Sarma B. K., Singh S. P., Singh H. B. Unraveling the efficient applications of secondary metabolites of various Trichoderma spp. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology . 2014;98(2):533–544. doi: 10.1007/S00253-013-5344-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chu H., Wang J., Shen H., Yang Y., Zhu W., Li G. Investigation of family 18 chitinases and inhibitors by computer-aided approaches. Current Drug Targets . 2012;13(4):502–511. doi: 10.2174/138945012799499695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lindell S. D., Pattenden L. C., Shannon J. Combinatorial chemistry in the agrosciences. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry . 2009;17(12):4035–4046. doi: 10.1016/J.BMC.2009.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Odak I., Lukic T., Talic S. Impact of storage conditions on alteration of juniper and immortelle essential oils. Journal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants . 2018;21:614–622. doi: 10.1080/0972060X.2018.1489309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gashaw G., Alemu T., Tesfaye K. Evaluation of disease incidence and severity and yield loss of finger millet varieties and mycelial growth inhibition of Pyricularia grisea isolates using biological antagonists and fungicides in vitro condition. Journal of Applied Biosciences . 2015;73:5883–5901. doi: 10.4314/jab.v73i1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rahman M. M., Alam A. K. M. M., Naher N., Sharifuzzaman S. M., Uddin M. A. N. Reaction of barley genotypes to Bipolaris sorokiniana. Journal of Agricultural Research . 2011;36(1):123–128. doi: 10.3329/BJAR.V36I1.9236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chester K. S. How sick is the plant. Plant Pathology . 1959;1:99–142. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Blanco F. F., Folegatti M. V. A new method for estimating the leaf area index of cucumber and tomato plants. Horticultura Brasileira . 2003;21(4):666–669. doi: 10.1590/S0102-05362003000400019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Foolad M. R., Lin G. Y. Heritability of early blight resistance in a Lycopersicon esculentum x Lycopersicon hirsutum cross estimated by correlation between parent and progeny. Plant Breeding . 2001;120(2):173–177. doi: 10.1046/J.1439-0523.2001.00573.X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jadon K. S., Thirumalaisamy P. P., Koradia V. G., Padavi R. D. Management of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) diseases through nutrient supplements. Legume Research an International Journal . 2018;41(2):316–321. doi: 10.18805/LR-3835. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Concha-Meyer A., Eifert J., Wang H., Sanglay G. Volume estimation of strawberries, mushrooms, and tomatoes with a machine vision system. International Journal of Food Properties . 2018;21(1):1867–1874. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2018.1508156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hao G., Dong Q., Yang G. A comparative study on the constitutive properties of marketed pesticides. Molecular Informatics . 2011;30(6-7):614–622. doi: 10.1002/MINF.201100020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Brown D. W., Lee S. H., Kim L. H., et al. Identification of a 12-gene fusaric acid biosynthetic gene cluster in Fusarium species through comparative and functional genomics. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions . 2015;28(3):319–332. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-14-0264-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kishore G. K., Pande S., Harish S. Evaluation of essential oils and their components for broad-spectrum antifungal activity and control of late leaf spot and crown rot diseases in peanut. Plant Disease . 2007;91(4):375–379. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kuzmanic A., Zagrovic B. Determination of ensemble-average pairwise root mean-square deviation from experimental B-factors. Biophysical Journal . 2010;98(5):861–871. doi: 10.1016/J.BPJ.2009.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hakala K., Hannukkala A. O., Huusela-Veistola E., Jalli M., Peltonen-Sainio P. Pests and diseases in a changing climate a major challenge for Finnish crop production. Agricultural and Food Science . 2011;20(1):3–14. doi: 10.2137/145960611795163042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Boxall A. B. A., Hardy A., Beulke S., et al. Impacts of climate change on indirect human exposure to pathogens and chemicals from agriculture. Environmental Health Perspectives . 2009;117(4):508–514. doi: 10.1289/EHP.0800084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zubrod J. P., Bundschuh M., Arts G., et al. Fungicides: an overlooked pesticide class? Environmental Science & Technology . 2019;53(7):3347–3365. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gakuubi M. M., Maina A. W., Wagacha J. M. Antifungal activity of essential oil ofEucalyptus camaldulensisDehnh. against selectedFusariumspp. International Journal of Microbiology . 2017;2017:7. doi: 10.1155/2017/8761610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Riyaz M., Mathew P., Zuber S. M., Rather G. A. Sustainable Agriculture . Springer Nature; 2022. Botanical pesticides for an eco-friendly and sustainable agriculture: new challenges and prospects; pp. 69–96. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McKinnon P. S., Davis S. L. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases . 2004;23(4):271–288. doi: 10.1007/S10096-004-1107-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Shafique S., Asif M., Shafique S. Management of Fusarium oxysporum f sp capsici by leaf extract of Eucalyptus citriodora. Pakistan Journal of Botany . 2015;47(3):1177–1182. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pedrotti C., Marcon A. R., Sergio Echeverrigaray L., Ribeiro R. T. D. S., Schwambach J. Essential oil as sustainable alternative for diseases management of grapes in postharvest and in vineyard and its influence on wine. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part. B . 2021;56(1):73–81. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2020.1838827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bashir Kutawa A., Daniel Danladi M., Haruna A. Antifungal activity of garlic (Allium sativum) extract on some selected fungi. Journal of Medicinal Herbs and Ethnomedicine . 1970;4:12–14. doi: 10.25081/JMHE.2018.V4.3383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mohammadpour H., Moghimipour E., Rasooli I., et al. Chemical composition and antifungal activity of Cuminum cyminum L. essential oil from Alborz Mountain against aspergillus species. Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products . 2012;7(2):50–55. doi: 10.5812/jjpharma.3445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Romagnoli C., Andreotti E., Maietti S., Mahendra R., Mares D. Antifungal activity of essential oil from fruits of Indian Cuminum cyminum. Pharmaceutical Biology . 2010;48(7):834–838. doi: 10.3109/13880200903283715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Naziya B., Murali M., Amruthesh K. N. Plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) instigate plant growth and induce disease resistance in Capsicum annuum L. upon infection with Colletotrichum capsici (Syd.) Butler & Bisby. Biomolecules . 2019;10:p. 41. doi: 10.3390/BIOM10010041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Misharina T. A., Polshkov A. N. Antioxidant properties of essential oils: autoxidation of essential oils from laurel and fennel and effects of mixing with essential oil from coriander. Prikladnaia Biokhimiia i Mikrobiologiia . 2005;41(6):693–702. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16358762/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Khan M. S., Mehmood B., Yousafi Q., et al. Molecular docking studies reveal rhein from rhubarb (Rheum rhabarbarum) as a putative inhibitor of ATP-binding cassette super-family G member 2. Medicinal Chemistry . 2021;17(3):273–288. doi: 10.2174/1573406416666191219143232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Tice C. M. Selecting the right compounds for screening: does Lipinski’s rule of 5 for pharmaceuticals apply to agrochemicals. Pest Management Science . 2001;57(1):3–16. doi: 10.1002/1526-4998(200101)57:1<3::aid-ps269>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jiménez-Reyes M. F., Carrasco H., Olea A. F., et al. Natural compounds: a sustainable alternative to the phytopathogens control. Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society . 2019;64(2):4459–4465. doi: 10.4067/S0717-97072019000204459. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Treisman J., Harris E., Desplan C. The paired box encodes a second DNA-binding domain in the paired homeo domain protein. Genes & Development . 1991;5(4):594–604. doi: 10.1101/GAD.5.4.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Qing X., Lee X. Y., De Raeymaeker J., et al. Pharmacophore modeling: advances, limitations, and current utility in drug discovery. Journal of Receptor, Ligand and Channel Research . 2014;7:81–92. doi: 10.2147/JRLCR.S46843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Khedkar S., Malde A., Coutinho E., Srivastava S. Pharmacophore modeling in drug discovery and development: an overview. Medicinal Chemistry . 2007;3(2):187–197. doi: 10.2174/157340607780059521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Mustata G., Follis A. V., Hammoudeh D. I., et al. Discovery of novel myc-max heterodimer disruptors with a three-dimensional pharmacophore model. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry . 2009;52(5):1247–1250. doi: 10.1021/jm801278g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bibi S., Hasan M. M., Wang Y.-B., Papadakos S. P., Yu H. Cordycepin as a promising inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) Current Medicinal Chemistry . 2022;29(1):152–162. doi: 10.2174/0929867328666210820114025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lyu C., Chen T., Qiang B., et al. CMNPD: a comprehensive marine natural products database towards facilitating drug discovery from the ocean. Nucleic Acids Research . 2021;49(D1):D509–D515. doi: 10.1093/NAR/GKAA763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Pinto E., Alves M. J. G., Cavaleiro C., Salgueiro L. Antifungal activity of Thapsia villosa essential oil against Candida, Cryptococcus, Malassezia, Aspergillus and Dermatophyte species. Molecules . 2017;22(10):p. 1595. doi: 10.3390/MOLECULES22101595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Martínez L. Automatic identification of mobile and rigid substructures in molecular dynamics simulations and fractional structural fluctuation analysis. PLoS One . 2015;10(3):p. e0119264. doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0119264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rheims H., Schumann P., Rohde M., Stackebrandt E. Verrucosispora gifhornensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the actinobacterial family Micromonosporaceae. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology . 1998;48(4):1119–1127. doi: 10.1099/00207713-48-4-1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Goodfellow M., Stach J. E. M., Brown R., et al. Verrucosispora maris sp. nov., a novel deep-sea actinomycete isolated from a marine sediment which produces abyssomicins. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek . 2012;101(1):185–193. doi: 10.1007/S10482-011-9651-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Shirai M., Okuda M., Motohashi K., et al. Terpenoids produced by actinomycetes: isolation, structural elucidation and biosynthesis of new diterpenes, gifhornenolones A and B from Verrucosispora gifhornensis YM28-088. The Journal of Antibiotics . 2010;63(5):245–250. doi: 10.1038/ja.2010.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Huang P., Xie F., Ren B., et al. Anti-MRSA and anti-TB metabolites from marine-derived Verrucosispora sp. MS100047. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology . 2016;100(17):7437–7447. doi: 10.1007/S00253-016-7406-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Fiedler H. P., Bruntner C., Riedlinger J., et al. Proximicin A, B and C, novel aminofuran antibiotic and anticancer compounds isolated from marine strains of the actinomycete Verrucosispora. Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo) . 2008;61(3):158–163. doi: 10.1038/JA.2008.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kyeremeh K., Acquah K. S., Camas M., et al. Butrepyrazinone, a new pyrazinone with an unusual methylation pattern from a Ghanaian Verrucosispora sp. K51G. Marine Drugs . 2014;12(10):5197–5208. doi: 10.3390/MD12105197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The supplementary file S1 is available online along with the manuscript. Other supplementary material will be provided by the corresponding author on request.
Data Availability Statement
The authors declare that all the data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article.
