Skip to main content
PMC home page
Horticulture Research logoLink to Horticulture Research
. 2022 May 26;9:uhac122. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac122

Engineering drought-tolerant apple by knocking down six GH3 genes and potential application of transgenic apple as a rootstock

Lijuan Jiang 1,b, Wenyun Shen 2,b, Chen Liu 3, Muhammad Mobeen Tahir 4, Xuewei Li 5, Shuangxi Zhou 6, Fengwang Ma 7, Qingmei Guan 8,✉
PMCID: PMC9347023  PMID: 35937857

Abstract

Drought poses a major threat to apple fruit production and quality. Because of the apple’s long juvenile phase, developing varieties with improved drought tolerance using biotechnology approaches is needed. Here, we used the RNAi approach to knock down six GH3 genes in the apple. Under prolonged drought stress, the MdGH3 RNAi plants performed better than wild-type plants and had stronger root systems, higher root-to-shoot ratio, greater hydraulic conductivity, increased photosynthetic capacity, and increased water use efficiency. Moreover, MdGH3 RNAi plants promoted the drought tolerance of the scion when they were used as rootstock, compared with wild-type and M9-T337 rootstocks. Scions grafted onto MdGH3 RNAi plants showed increased plant height, stem diameter, photosynthetic capacity, specific leaf weight, and water use efficiency. The use of MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks can also increase the C/N ratio of the scion and achieve the same effect as the M9-T337 rootstock in promoting the flowering and fruiting of the scion. Notably, using MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks did not reduce fruit weight and scion quality compared with using M9-T337 rootstock. Our research provides candidate genes and demonstrates a general approach that could be used to improve the drought tolerance of fruit trees without sacrificing the yield and quality of scion fruits.

Introduction

Genetic improvements in the breeding of perennial woody plants are challenging to achieve because of their long growth period. New technologies (e.g. biotechnology) provide strategies to accelerate the breeding of woody plants and obtain new varieties with ideal characteristics [1–4]. Transgenic technology has been increasingly applied to agriculture. A typical example is the use of genetically modified soybeans [5]. Hence, it is effective and feasible to obtain new woody varieties using transgenic technology. In the field of fruit tree breeding, the use of genetically modified technology can circumvent the problem of interspecies hybridization, promote the improvement of fruit tree traits, and thus expand the scope of breeding by providing new avenues for fruit tree breeding.

During their growth and development, plants are often affected by various types of environmental stress, such as drought, ultraviolet radiation, high salinity, and temperature extremes. Drought, in particular, has a major effect on the growth and development of plants and impedes the development of good-quality and high-yield crops [6–8]. Plants adapt to the natural environment in regions where they have grown for long periods, and they have developed a set of physiological and ecological characteristics that are most suitable for their own growth and development, including a series of mechanisms to respond to drought. Plants can resist or endure the damage caused by drought stress in various ways [9–12], as drought can decrease the photosynthetic rate of plants, destroy the structure of chloroplasts, and restrict electron transfer and enzyme activity. Thus, photosynthetic capacity can reflect the degree of damage induced by drought stress in plants and can reflect drought tolerance [13].

Many plants adjust root structure in response to drought stress [14]. Changes in root system architecture improve the ability of plants to absorb water and enhance the drought resistance of plants under water deficits [15–17]. Generally, drought-resistant plants have roots and shoots with higher water-conducting capacity [18]. Root or shoot hydraulic conductivity can reflect the drought tolerance of plants under water-limited conditions [18, 19]. In addition, water use efficiency (WUE) is an important index of plant adaptation to drought stress [7, 20, 21]. Leaf carbon isotopic composition (δ13C) is widely used to quantify WUE. δ13C has been shown to be positively correlated with WUE in many species [7, 20, 22, 23], including apple [20]. Consequently, many studies have indicated that δ13C is an appropriate parameter for appraising the WUE of whole plants.

Grafting is an asexual plant reproduction technique that is widely used in horticultural plants. The most common method of grafting is to connect the vegetative organs of a plant with excellent characteristics to the stem of another rooted plant so that the two can heal and grow to form a new independent plant. The shoot piece is known as the ‘scion’ and the root piece is called the ‘rootstock’ (stock) [24–27]. Grafting has been widely applied in horticulture plants to obtain high-yield and good-quality fruits and vegetables [26–29], as it has been shown to not only improve yield and fruit quality but also increase the WUE of plants [29–31]. In addition, grafting has been shown to increase the resistance and adaptability of plants to biotic and abiotic stresses, including resistance to diseases, low and high temperatures, salinity, and drought [24, 31–38]. In fruit trees, grafting is widely used to improve stress tolerance, accelerate flowering, and shorten the juvenile phase [24]. Sugar is an energy substance that regulates plant growth and flowering transition in grape and citrus [39–41]. Sugars play an important role in plant flowering [42]. Besides, the high C/N ratio is also an important index to judge early flowering in fruit trees [42].

GH3 family proteins function in the conjugation of indole-3-acetic (IAA) to amino acids [43, 44]. The reaction of IAA conjugates with leucine, alanine, and phenylalanine is a reversible process, forming storage compounds that can be hydrolyzed to free IAA, while conjugates of IAA with glutamic or aspartate acid undergo oxidative metabolism without hydrolyzing to free IAA [43, 45–47]. In addition, GH3 family proteins work together with auxin oxidase and the conjugating enzyme Dioxygenase for Auxin Oxidation 1 (DAO1) to regulate IAA homeostasis during plant growth and development of Arabidopsis and rice [43, 48–50]. DFL1, an auxin-responsive GH3 gene in Arabidopsis, has been shown to promote the light response of hypocotyls and inhibit shoot cell elongation and lateral root formation [51]. Besides their roles in growth and development, GH3 family genes also play crucial roles in plant resistance to stresses [14]. For example, overexpression of OsGH3.2 in rice decreases drought tolerance [52]. OsGH3.13 was induced by drought, and OsGH3.13-overexpressing rice showed enhanced drought tolerance [53]. In cotton, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) of GH3.5 reduces drought and salt tolerance [54].

Apple trees have one of the longest cultivation histories and are one of the most widely planted fruit trees in the world. In the Northwest Loess Plateau, drought has seriously affected the growth and production of apples [6–8]. To reduce the losses caused by drought, rootstocks with drought tolerance need to be developed. The breeding of apple rootstocks with improved drought tolerance can be achieved using biotechnology approaches. Previously, we found that knockdown of six GH3 family genes (MdGH3.6 and its close paralogs) from Malus × domestica increased the apple wax content and drought tolerance under short-term drought conditions [55]. In this study, we demonstrate that the knockdown of six MdGH3 genes increases the adaptability of apple trees to prolonged drought and that the use of MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks improves scion performance under drought, compared with non-transgenic plants (GL-3) and M9-T337 rootstocks. M9-T337 is the most widely used apple dwarfing rootstock, which has contributed to the early flowering and fruit setting of the scions. However, it is sensitive to water deficits due to its shallow and weak root system [56]. In addition, when compared with the M9-T337 rootstock, MdGH3 RNAi as rootstocks did not reduce the flowering rate, fruit size, and quality of the scion. Our results provide candidate genes for improvement of the drought tolerance of fruit trees without penalty to scion fruit yield and quality.

Results

Knockdown of MdGH3 genes improves apple performance under long-term drought stress

To investigate whether the repression of MdGH3 genes (MdGH3.6 and its close paralogs) affects the tolerance of apples to long-term drought, a 2-month drought stress treatment was applied to GL-3 and MdGH3 RNAi plants. Long-term drought significantly decreased plant height and stem diameter. Still, MdGH3 RNAi plants were slightly taller and had greater diameters than GL-3 plants under prolonged drought (Fig. 1a–c). Under long-term drought, GL-3 plants decreased in height by 33% and in diameter by 21%. By contrast, MdGH3 RNAi plants decreased in height by 23% and in diameter by 10% under the same drought conditions (Fig. 1b and c). Additionally, MdGH3 RNAi plants had better photosynthetic capacity, higher stomatal conductance, higher intercellular CO2, and a higher transpiration rate under long-term drought stress (Fig. 1d–g). Their photosynthetic rate declined by 36% under drought, compared with a decline of 51% in GL-3 plants under drought (Fig. 1d). Under well-watered conditions, MdGH3 RNAi plants had thicker stem diameters (Fig. 1c). However, no significant differences in plant height, photosynthetic capacity, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2, and transpiration rate between GL-3 and MdGH3 RNAi plants were observed under well-watered conditions (Fig. 1b, d–g).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

MdGH3 RNAi plants perform better after long-term drought stress. a Morphology of GL-3 and MdGH3 RNAi plants under well-watered and prolonged drought stress. b–g Plant height (b), stem diameter (c), photosynthetic rate (d), stomatal conductance (e), intercellular CO2 concentration (f), and transpiration rate (g) of GL-3 and MdGH3 RNAi plants under well-watered and long-term drought stress. Plants were exposed to drought for 60 days. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 18). One-way ANOVA (Tukey test) was performed.

Long-term drought reduced shoot and root dry weight as well as root size (Fig. 2a–d). Specifically, the root and shoot dry weights of GL-3 plants were reduced by 45 and 44% under drought, respectively, whereas those of MdGH3 RNAi plants were reduced by 32 and 33%, respectively (Fig. 2a and b). The root-to-shoot ratio is an indicator of plant adaptation to drought stress [18]. The root-to-shoot ratio of GL-3 plants did not differ significantly between well-watered and drought-stressed plants. However, the root-to-shoot ratio was slightly higher in drought-stressed MdGH3 RNAi plants than in well-watered plants, suggesting that MdGH3 RNAi plants had better performance under drought stress. More importantly, the MdGH3 RNAi plants had a higher root-to-shoot ratio than GL-3 plants under drought stress (Fig. 2d). We also measured the ABA content of GL-3 and MdGH3 RNAi plants under well-watered and long-term drought stress conditions (Supplementary Data Fig. S1a). We found that MdGH3 RNAi plants contained more abscisic acid (ABA) than GL-3 plants under well-watered and long-term drought stress conditions. Previously, we found that MdGH3 RNAi plants contain more IAA under short-term drought stress [55]. Therefore, we measured the IAA content of MdGH3 RNAi plants under well-watered and long-term drought stress conditions. We found that MdGH3 RNAi plants contained more IAA than GL-3 plants in leaves and roots under well-watered and long-term drought stress conditions (Supplementary Data Figs S1b and S2). Overall, these data suggest that MdGH3 RNAi plants were more tolerant of long-term drought stress.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

MdGH3 RNAi plants develop a stronger root system after long-term drought stress. Dry weight of roots (a), dry weight of shoots (b), root morphology (c), and root-to-shoot ratio (d) of GL-3 and MdGH3 RNAi plants under well-watered and long-term drought stress. Plants were exposed to drought for 60 days. Scale bars = 3 cm. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 7). One-way ANOVA (Tukey test) was performed.

Knockdown of MdGH3 genes increases hydraulic conductivity and water use efficiency under long-term drought

Prolonged drought stress decreased both root and shoot hydraulic conductivity (Fig. 3a and b). However, drought stress affected both parameters more severely in GL-3 plants, and the effect on root hydraulic conductivity was particularly pronounced. Under drought stress, the root hydraulic conductivity of GL-3 plants decreased by 45% and that of MdGH3 RNAi plants decreased by only 12% (Fig. 3b). Compared with GL-3 plants, MdGH3 RNAi plants had significantly higher root and shoot hydraulic conductivity under drought stress (Fig. 3a and b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

MdGH3 RNAi plants had greater hydraulic conductivity and higher water use efficiency (WUE) after long-term drought stress. a, b Shoot hydraulic conductivity (a) and root hydraulic conductivity (b) of GL-3 and MdGH3 RNAi plants under well-watered and long-term drought stress. c WUE was determined by carbon isotope composition (δ13C). Plants were exposed to drought for 60 days. d Intrinsic WUE. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 7). One-way ANOVA (Tukey test) was performed.

WUE represents a fundamental physiological trade-off in plants, and higher WUE is favorable in consistently water-limited environments [21]. Using carbon isotope composition (δ13C) as a physiological indicator of WUE, we found that drought stress increased the WUE of all plants. However, MdGH3 RNAi plants had a considerably higher WUE than GL-3 plants under both well-watered and drought conditions (Fig. 3c). In addition, intrinsic WUE (WUEi), which was measured as the ratio of photosynthesis rate/transpiration rate, was higher in MdGH3 RNAi plants compared with GL-3 under drought stress (Fig. 3d).

We also evaluated long-term drought stress tolerance with the same plants for an additional year and obtained similar findings. Under long-term drought stress, MdGH3 RNAi plants were taller, had higher photosynthetic rates, higher root and shoot hydraulic conductivity, and thicker stem diameters (Supplementary Data Fig. S3), suggesting that MdGH3 RNAi plants grow better under prolonged drought stress.

Grafting ‘Fuji’ onto MdGH3 RNAi plants enhances drought tolerance

Stress-resistant rootstocks are critical for fruit tree cultivation. To examine the effect of MdGH3 RNAi plants on scion drought tolerance, we grafted the ‘Fuji’ scion onto GL-3, MdGH3 RNAi (RNAi), or M9-T337 rootstock. M9-T337 is a widely used dwarf apple rootstock. We then exposed the grafted plants to long-term drought stress. Under well-watered conditions, ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants were shorter, but there was no difference in height between ‘Fuji’/GL-3 and ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants. Under drought stress, ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants were the shortest, and ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants were significantly taller than ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 4a and b). Stem diameter showed a pattern similar to plant height, although diameter did not differ among grafting combinations under well-watered conditions (Fig. 4c). Long-term drought stress decreased the photosynthetic rate and increased the WUE of all grafted plants. Under drought, the decrease in photosynthetic rate was lower in ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants (~7%) than in ‘Fuji’/GL-3 and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants (~15%). Therefore, the photosynthetic capacity of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants under drought was higher than that of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants, and the photosynthetic capacity of the latter two graft combinations did not significantly differ (Fig. 4d). ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants had consistently higher specific leaf weight and lower specific leaf area (Supplementary Data Fig. S4a and b). Moreover, stable carbon isotope composition analysis showed that ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants had higher WUE than ‘Fuji’/GL-3 and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants under both well-watered and drought stress conditions. ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants had the lowest WUE under drought (Fig. 4e). Together, these findings indicate that using MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks can facilitate scion performance under long-term drought.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

‘Fuji’ plants grafted onto the MdGH3 RNAi rootstock were more tolerant to long-term drought stress. Plant morphology (a), plant height (b), stem diameter (c), photosynthetic rate (d), and water use efficiency (e) of ‘Fuji’ plants grafted on GL-3, M9-T337, and MdGH3 RNAi plants under well-watered and long-term drought stress. Plants were exposed to drought for 60 days. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 5–7). One-way ANOVA (Tukey test) was performed.

Grafting ‘Fuji’ onto MdGH3 RNAi plants promotes flowering and fruiting after drought

Flowering and fruit setting are of great concern for fruit trees. M9-T337 is a dwarf rootstock that can promote early flowering and early fruiting. To study whether drought-tolerant MdGH3 RNAi plants affect the flowering and fruiting of scions when used as the rootstock, we observed the flowering and fruiting of ‘Fuji’ scions grafted onto different rootstocks 2 or 3 years after grafting.

In the well-watered group, only ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants had buds and fruits in the second year (Supplementary Data Fig. S6). Three years after grafting, ‘Fuji’/RNAi plant buds were larger and bloomed earlier than ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 5a). In addition, the flowering rate of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants was higher than that of ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 and ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 5b). Notably, ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants did not bear fruit, though they bloomed in the spring (Fig. 5a). There was no difference in fruit size between ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants (Fig. 5c and d).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Grafting ‘Fuji’ onto MdGH3 RNAi plants promotes flowering, fruit setting, and fruit size of the scion after drought. a Flowering and fruit setting of ‘Fuji’ grafted onto GL-3, M9-T337, and MdGH3 RNAi plants after 3 years. Scale bars = 5 cm. Well-watered, all plants were regularly watered. Drought, all plants were subjected to long-term drought stress for 60 days in the first year and then watered regularly. b–d Flowering rate (b), fruit diameter (c), and fruit length (d) of the grafted plants shown in (a). Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 5). One-way ANOVA (Tukey test) was performed.

After treatment with prolonged drought stress for 2 months, the grafted plants were watered normally. In the second year after grafting, ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants and ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants bloomed and bore fruits, except for ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Supplementary Data Fig. S6). Three years after grafting, the ‘Fuji’/RNAi plant buds were larger and bloomed earlier than the ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants. The flowering rate of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants was greater than that of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 5b). In addition, the fruits of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants were set as early as those of ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants (Fig. 5a). Moreover, the fruit size of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants was as large as that of ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 but larger than that of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 5c and d). Interestingly, we found that after long-term drought stress the fruits of all grafting combinations were larger than those under well-watered conditions (Fig. 5c and d). Overall, these findings indicate that the use of MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks can achieve the same effect as the M9-T337 rootstock to promote the early flowering, fruiting, and fruit size of the scion.

Grafting ‘Fuji’ onto MdGH3 RNAi plants increases C/N ratio after drought

To investigate the mechanisms of early flowering, we measured the contents of soluble sugar, starch, and total N in scions of different grafting combinations. Among the drought-treated grafting combinations, we found that the contents of soluble sugar and starch of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants were higher than those of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 6a and b), while the total nitrogen content of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants was lower than that of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, the C/N ratio of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants was higher than that of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants and similar to that of ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants (Fig. 6d). These results indicate that the high C/N ratio might contribute to the early flowering of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Grafting ‘Fuji’ onto the MdGH3 RNAi plants facilitates the C/N ratio in the scion. Contents of soluble sugar (a), starch (b), and total N (c) and C/N ratio (d) in ‘Fuji’ grafted onto GL-3, MdGH3 RNAi, and M9-T337 plants after 3 years. Well-watered, all plants were regularly watered. Drought, all plants were subjected to long-term drought stress for 60 days in the first year and then watered regularly. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 3). One-way ANOVA (Tukey test) was performed.

Grafting ‘Fuji’ onto MdGH3 RNAi plants promotes fruit size and fruit quality after drought

Fruit yield and quality are two crucial parameters for the industry. Therefore, we next measured fruit weight and quality at the ripening stage. In the well-watered group, there was no difference in fruit weight and fruit quality between ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants (Fig. 7; Supplementary Data Figs S8 and S9).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Grafting ‘Fuji’ onto MdGH3 RNAi plants promotes fruit size and quality of the scion after drought. Fruit diameter (a), fruit length (b), fruit weight (c), fruit pulp crispness (d), fruit firmness (e), fruit soluble solids content (SSC, f), fruit acidity (g), and sugar/acid ratio (h). Well-watered, all plants were regularly watered. Drought, all plants were subjected to long-term drought stress for 60 days in the first year and then watered regularly. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (n = 5). One-way ANOVA (Tukey test) was performed.

Among the drought-treated grafting combinations, ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants had similar fruit size parameters (fruit diameter, fruit length, and fruit weight) and fruit quality parameters (crispness, firmness, SSC, acidity, sugar/acid ratio, peel hardiness, brightness, red degree, and yellow degree), except for fruit peel ductility (Fig. 7; Supplementary Data Figs S8 and S9b). Except for fruit red degree and yellow degree, which showed no difference among all grafting combinations, the fruits of ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants had higher fruit weight, stronger fruit brightness, higher fruit peel hardness, better fruit peel ductility, greater fruit pulp crispness, improved fruit firmness, improved fruit soluble solid content, lower fruit acidity, and improved sugar/acid ratio, compared with the fruits of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 7; Supplementary Data Figs S8, and S9). These results suggest that the use of MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks can achieve an effect similar to that of the M9-T337 rootstock without sacrificing fruit size and fruit quality of the scion.

Expression of fruit size-related genes in scion fruits

To understand the molecular basis of fruit enlargement of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants, we measured the expression levels of five genes associated with fruit size in the fruits of the scions: Mdm-miR172p, MdAP2, MdARF6, MdEXP1, and MdEXP10 (EXP, expansion). Previous studies have shown that miRNA172p inhibits apple fruit growth by negatively regulating APETALA2 (AP2) [57]. AP2 is required for sepal development [58], which contributes to apple fruit size [57]. ARF6 is upregulated in the later stages of apple fruit development [59]. In addition, cell expansion can also affect fruit size [60–62]. The expression of MdAP2 and MdARF6 was upregulated in the fruits of ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 under drought. The expression of MdEXP1 and MdEXP10, homologs of EXP1and EXP10, was also upregulated in the fruits of ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 under drought stress, while the expression of Mdm-miR172p was downregulated in the fruits of ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 (Supplementary Data Fig. S10). These results suggest that altered expression of these genes may contribute to the enlarged fruit of ‘Fuji’/RNAi.

Discussion

We engineered transgenic apple plants with reduced expression of six MdGH3 genes. The transgenic MdGH3 RNAi plants displayed increased tolerance to long-term drought stress with greater growth, photosynthetic capacity, root system biomass, root and shoot hydraulic conductivity, root-to-shoot ratio, and WUE. When the ‘Fuji’ scion was grafted onto MdGH3 RNAi plants, their drought stress tolerance and flowering rate improved when compared with ‘Fuji’ grafted onto GL-3 and M9-T337 rootstocks. In addition, using MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks did not reduce the fruit weight and quality of the scion compared with M9-T337 rootstocks. We also verified that the NPTII genes (kanamycin resistance determinants) could not be moved from the MdGH3 RNAi rootstock to the ‘Fuji’ scion (Supplementary Data Fig. S5), confirming that there was no transgene risk to humans or the environment. The use of MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks to improve scion performance under drought stress is therefore feasible.

Root system architecture plays a vital role in the drought tolerance of plants, including fruit trees [18, 63, 64]. Generally, root system size is positively correlated with drought tolerance. A higher root-to-shoot ratio directly reflects the drought tolerance of plants under drought conditions. Increases in the root-to-shoot ratio improve the survival rate of plants under drought stress [65]. In our study, we found that the roots of MdGH3 RNAi transgenic plants were stronger than those of GL-3 after long-term drought treatment (Fig. 2b and c), and MdGH3 RNAi plants had a higher root-to-shoot ratio compared with GL-3 plants (Fig. 2d). The stronger root systems of MdGH3 RNAi transgenic plants may be related to the function of the GH3 genes themselves. Previous research has shown that GH3 genes participate in auxin homeostasis by conjugating excess IAA to amino acids [43, 44, 66]. Overexpression of OsGH3-2 in rice decreases IAA levels, resulting in fewer crown roots and root hairs [52]. Overexpression of MsGH3.5 in the apple rootstock M26 observably reduces the IAA levels but increases the cytokinin levels, resulting in fewer adventitious roots [66]. In our study, we found that MdGH3 RNAi plants had higher IAA content than GL-3 in leaves and roots after long-term drought stress(Supplementary Data Figs S1b and S2). Therefore, the stronger root systems of MdGH3 RNAi plants under long-term drought stress may be attributed to their increased IAA content.

WUE is positively correlated with drought tolerance of plants [7, 20, 21], including apple [7, 20, 31], and is an important index of plant adaptation to drought stress [21]. WUE can vary with the photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, or both [21]. MhYTP1 overexpression improves drought tolerance and WUE in apple plants by increasing ABA levels and stomatal density, and reducing the stomatal aperture [31]. Previous studies have also shown that changes in root structure can improve the capacity of plants to absorb water as well as WUE under drought stress [15–17, 67]. Rice varieties with greater root weight and longer root length have higher WUE [67]. In our study, MdGH3 RNAi plants had higher photosynthetic rates, stronger root systems, and higher root hydraulic conductivity than GL-3 plants under prolonged drought stress (Figs 2 and 3), indicating that the higher WUE in MdGH3 RNAi plants might be attributed to their high photosynthesis rate and strong root system.

Grafting is a viable method for improving scion growth, early flowering, fruit quality, and stress resistance [27, 29, 31, 37, 38, 68]. The use of salt-tolerant rootstock improves the yield of pepper (the scion) under salinity stress by maintaining photosynthetic capacity and sink strength [29]. In addition, grafting can improve drought tolerance of scions by modifying antioxidant enzyme activities [38], improving photosynthetic capacity, and decreasing reactive oxygen species accumulation under drought stress in the scions [68].

We found that using MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks improves scion performance under drought conditions. Firstly, using MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks may have a positive effect on growth. MdGH3 RNAi plants developed a stronger root system and were more effective in absorbing and transporting water and nutrients to the shoot compared with GL-3 plants. ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants not only had greater diameters but were also taller and had higher photosynthetic capacity, WUE, and specific leaf dry weight compared with ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 4; Supplementary Data Fig. S4). The strong roots of MdGH3 RNAi plants might play a key role in improving the drought tolerance of scions. Previous studies have demonstrated communication of the genetic material between the stock and the scion [69, 70]. Grafting to msh1 rootstock leads to heritable and enhanced growth vigor of scion progeny in Arabidopsis and tomato, which is associated with the small interfering RNA (siRNA)-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) process [69]. Communication between transgenic MdGH3 RNAi plants and scions should also occur; however, additional studies are required to confirm this. Secondly, the use of MdGH3 RNAi plants as rootstocks can achieve the same effect as the M9-T337 rootstock in promoting early flowering, fruit setting, fruit weight, and fruit quality of the scions after drought (Figs 5 and 7). A high C/N ratio has been found to promote the early flowering of plants [42]. We measured the C/N ratio in scions of different grafting combinations and found that the C/N ratio of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants was higher than that of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants and was similar to that of ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 plants (Fig. 6d). Among the drought-treated grafting combinations, we found that the fruit size of ‘Fuji’/RNAi plants was similar to that of ‘Fuji’/M9-T337 but larger than that of ‘Fuji’/GL-3 plants (Fig. 7a–c). Our previous research demonstrated that MdGH3 RNAi plants contain more IAA under well-watered and short-term drought conditions [55]. In the current study, we also measured the IAA content in the leaves and roots of MdGH3 RNAi plants and GL-3 plants. We found that MdGH3 RNAi plants had more IAA under long-term droughtconditions (Supplementary Data Figs S1b and S2). However, to our surprise there was no significant difference in IAA content among all grafting combinations (Supplementary Data Fig. S7), implying that IAA might not contribute to the larger fruit size of ‘Fuji’/RNAi and ‘Fuji’/M9-T337. Therefore, it is possible that transgenic rootstocks may affect scion fruit size through cell expansion and the miRNA172-AP2 pathway.

In sum, we engineered transgenic apple plants with reduced expression of six MdGH3 genes. The MdGH3 RNAi plants displayed improved drought tolerance, WUE, hydraulic conductivity, root-to-shoot ratio, and photosynthetic capacity under drought stress. We found that they could be used as rootstocks to improve scion performance under drought conditions without penalty to fruit yield and quality. These results define the functions of six MdGH3 genes in promoting tolerance to drought conditions and suggest that these six MdGH3 genes can serve as candidate genes for the breeding of apple drought tolerance using biotechnology.

Materials and methods

Plant materials, growth conditions, and stress treatment

Long-term drought treatment was described previously [18, 55]. Briefly, 36 seedlings of non-transgenic plants (GL-3, selected from progenies of M. × domestica ‘Royal Gala’) or MdGH3 RNAi plants [55] (knockdown of MdGH3.6 and five close paralogs from Malus × domestica) were transferred to pots (30 cm × 18 cm) filled with equal parts of local loess sand and wormcast medium. Pots were placed in a greenhouse under natural illumination, with a humidity of 35–55% and a temperature of 20–35°C for 1 month. Fourteen grafted plants were grown in the same environment. Plants of each line were divided into two groups: a well-watered group (field capacity of 75–85%, n = 18 or 7) and a long-term drought group (field capacity of 45–55%, n = 18 or 7). Both treatments lasted ~60 days.

Plant height was measured with a meter ruler. Stem diameter, fruit diameter, and fruit length were measured with a Vernier caliper. Photosynthetic rate, intercellular CO2 concentration, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate were monitored with an LI-6400XT (LI-COR, USA). Leaf area was recorded with a scanner. Leaf weight and dry weight of roots and stems were measured with an electronic balance. Data were collected from the fifth to ninth leaves from the base of the stems.

Measurement of sugar, starch, and total N content

About 0.5 mg of the dry weight of leaves was used for soluble sugar and starch extractions, and the contents were determined by an anthrone colorimetric method [71]. Approximately 0.5 mg of dry weight of leaves was used for total N extraction, and the content was determined as described previously [72]. The fifth to ninth leaves from the base of the stems were used as plant materials.

Measurement of hydraulic conductivity

Hydraulic conductivity of roots and shoots was determined with a high-pressure flow meter (HPFM, Dynamax, Houston) according to previous methods [18, 73, 74].

Stable carbon isotope analysis

Stable carbon isotope analysis (δ13C) was performed according to previous descriptions [20] in the Third Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources in China.

Measurement of fruit weight and quality

Fruit weight was measured with an electronic scale. Fruit diameter and fruit length were measured with a Vernier caliper. The color indicators (brightness, red degree, and yellow degree) were recorded with a chromatic meter. Fruit firmness was measured with a hardness tester. Fruit pulp crispness, fruit peel hardness, and fruit peel ductility were monitored with a texture analyzer. Fruit soluble solids content was measured by a saccharimeter, and fruit acidity was measured by an acidimeter. Data were collected from five fruits. One fruit was used as one biological replicate.

RNA isolation and RT–qPCR analysis

About 0.5 g of scion fruit pulp from all grafting combinations under well-watered and drought conditions was used for RNA extraction as described previously [55]. RT–qPCR analysis was performed as described previously [55]. The primers are shown in Supplementary Data Table S1.

Indole-3-acetic acid measurements

The IAA content of leaves from all scions was extracted and quantified according to the methods described by Jiang et al. [55]. In brief, 1 g of frozen powder of leaf sample was extracted for 16 hours with hormone extraction buffer at 4°C in the dark. The content of IAA was quantitatively analyzed by HPLC–MS/MS (QTRAP 5500).

Statistical analysis

Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s test) using SPSS (version 21.0). Variations were considered significant if P < .05, .01, or .001.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFD1000100) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31872080).

Author contributions

Q.G. designed the project; L.J., W.S., and C.L. conducted experiments and data analysis; L.J .and Q.G. wrote the manuscript; M.M.T., X.L., F.M., and S.Z. helped with the discussion of the work. All the authors were involved in the preparation of the final manuscript.

Data availability

Sequence information used in this article can be found in the Genome Database for Rosaceae with the following gene numbers: MDP0000281079 (Mdm-miRNA172p), MDP0000137561 (MdAP2), MDP0000268306 (MdARF6), MDP0000681724 (MdEXP1), and MDP0000560112 (MdEXP10).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary data

Supplementary data is available at Horticulture Research online.

Supplementary Material

Web_Material_uhac122
Click here for additional data file. (301.2KB, zip)

Contributor Information

Lijuan Jiang, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

Wenyun Shen, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

Chen Liu, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

Muhammad Mobeen Tahir, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

Xuewei Li, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

Shuangxi Zhou, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Ltd, Hawke’s Bay 4130, New Zealand.

Fengwang Ma, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

Qingmei Guan, State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas/Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Apple, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

References

  • 1. Terns RM, Terns MP. CRISPR-based technologies: prokaryotic defense weapons repurposed. Trends Genet. 2014;30:111–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Manghwar H, Lindsey K, Zhang Xet al. CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing. Trends Plant Sci. 2019;24:1102–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tzfira T, Li J, Lacroix Bet al. Agrobacterium T-DNA integration: molecules and models. Trends Genet. 2004;20:375–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Khawar KM, Onarci S, Ozel CAet al. Plant biotechnology. Sci World J. 2013;2013:736731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Herman EM. Genetically modified soybeans and food allergies. J Exp Bot. 2003;54:1317–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wu S, Liang D, Ma F. Leaf micromorphology and sugar may contribute to differences in drought tolerance for two apple cultivars. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;80:249–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Zhou S, Li M, Guan Qet al. Physiological and proteome analysis suggest critical roles for the photosynthetic system for high water-use efficiency under drought stress in Malus. Plant Sci. 2015;236:44–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Huang L, Li M, Zhou Ket al. Uptake and metabolism of ammonium and nitrate in response to drought stress in Malus prunifolia. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;127:185–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fujii H, Zhu JK. Arabidopsis mutant deficient in 3 abscisic acid-activated protein kinases reveals critical roles in growth, reproduction, and stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:8380–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Fujita Y, Nakashima K, Yoshida Tet al. Three SnRK2 protein kinases are the main positive regulators of abscisic acid signaling in response to water stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009;50:2123–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yang W, Liu XD, Chi XJet al. Dwarf apple MbDREB1 enhances plant tolerance to low temperature, drought, and salt stress via both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent pathways. Planta. 2011;233:219–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Monneveux P, Ramírez DA, Pino MT. Drought tolerance in potato (S. tuberosum L.): can we learn from drought tolerance research in cereals? Plant Sci. 2013;205–206:76–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Jia X, Mao K, Wang Pet al. Overexpression of MdATG8i improves water use efficiency in transgenic apple by modulating photosynthesis, osmotic balance, and autophagic activity under moderate water deficit. Hortic Res. 2021;8:81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Singh VK, Jain M, Garg R. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling suggest diverse roles of GH3 genes during development and abiotic stress responses in legumes. Front Plant Sci. 2015;5:789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Dinneny JR. Developmental responses to water and salinity in root systems. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019;35:239–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado A. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science. 2020;368:266–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Rellan-Alvarez R, Lobet G, Dinneny JR. Environmental control of root system biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016;67:619–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Geng D, Chen P, Shen Xet al. MdMYB88 and MdMYB124 enhance drought tolerance by modulating root vessels and cell walls in apple. Plant Physiol. 2018;178:1296–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Atkinson CJ, Else MA, Taylor Let al. Root and stem hydraulic conductivity as determinants of growth potential in grafted trees of apple (Malus pumila Mill.). J Exp Bot. 2003;54:1221–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wang H, Zhao S, Mao Ket al. Mapping QTLs for water-use efficiency reveals the potential candidate genes involved in regulating the trait in apple under drought stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18:136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Kenney AM, McKay JK, Richards JHet al. Direct and indirect selection on flowering time, water-use efficiency (WUE, delta C-13), and WUE plasticity to drought in Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol Evol. 2014;4:4505–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Roussel M, Dreyer E, Montpied Pet al. The diversity of (13)C isotope discrimination in a Quercus robur full-sib family is associated with differences in intrinsic water use efficiency, transpiration efficiency, and stomatal conductance. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:2419–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bazzer SK, Kaler AS, Ray JDet al. Identification of quantitative trait loci for carbon isotope ratio (δ(13)C) in a recombinant inbred population of soybean. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133:2141–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Goldschmidt EE. Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Greenwood MS, Day ME, Schatz J. Separating the effects of tree size and meristem maturation on shoot development of grafted scions of red spruce (Picea rubens Sarg.). Tree Physiol. 2010;30:459–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Vanderklein D, Martínez-Vilalta J, Lee Set al. Plant size, not age, regulates growth and gas exchange in grafted Scots pine trees. Tree Physiol. 2007;27:71–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Foster TM, McAtee PA, Waite CNet al. Apple dwarfing rootstocks exhibit an imbalance in carbohydrate allocation and reduced cell growth and metabolism. Hortic Res. 2017;4:17009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Tombesi S, Johnson RS, Day KRet al. Relationships between xylem vessel characteristics, calculated axial hydraulic conductance and size-controlling capacity of peach rootstocks. Ann Bot. 2010;105:327–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Penella C, Landi M, Guidi Let al. Salt-tolerant rootstock increases yield of pepper under salinity through maintenance of photosynthetic performance and sinks strength. J Plant Physiol. 2016;193:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Cantero-Navarro E, Romero-Aranda R, Fernandez-Munoz Ret al. Improving agronomic water use efficiency in tomato by rootstock-mediated hormonal regulation of leaf biomass. Plant Sci. 2016;251:90–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Guo T, Wang N, Xue Yet al. Overexpression of the RNA binding protein MhYTP1 in transgenic apple enhances drought tolerance and WUE by improving ABA level under drought condition. Plant Sci. 2019;280:397–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Li H, Wang Y, Wang Zet al. Microarray and genetic analysis reveals that csa-miR159b plays a critical role in abscisic acid-mediated heat tolerance in grafted cucumber plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2016;39:1790–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Cuartero J, Bolarín MC, Asíns MJet al. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:1045–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Penella C, Nebauer SG, Quinones Aet al. Some rootstocks improve pepper tolerance to mild salinity through ionic regulation. Plant Sci. 2015;230:12–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Alsina MM, Smart DR, Bauerle Tet al. Seasonal changes of whole root system conductance by a drought-tolerant grape root system. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:99–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Bauerle TL, Centinari M, Bauerle WL. Shifts in xylem vessel diameter and embolisms in grafted apple trees of differing rootstock growth potential in response to drought. Planta. 2011;234:1045–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Han Q, Guo Q, Korpelainen Het al. Rootstock determines the drought resistance of poplar grafting combinations. Tree Physiol. 2019;39:1855–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Liu JJ, Li JQ, Su XHet al. Grafting improves drought tolerance by regulating antioxidant enzyme activities and stress-responsive gene expression in tobacco. Environ Exp Bot. 2014;107:173–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Turnbull C. Long-distance regulation of flowering time. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:4399–413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Serrano G, Herrera-Palau R, Romero JMet al. Chlamydomonas CONSTANS and the evolution of plant photoperiodic signaling. Curr Biol. 2009;19:359–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Shalom L, Samuelas S, Zur Net al. Fruit load induces changes in global gene expression and in abscisic acid (ABA) and indole acetic acid (IAA) homeostasis in citrus buds. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:3029–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Xing LB, Zhang D, Li YMet al. Transcription profiles reveal sugar and hormone signaling pathways mediating flower induction in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56:2052–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mellor N, Band LR, Pencik Aet al. Dynamic regulation of auxin oxidase and conjugating enzymes AtDAO1 and GH3 modulates auxin homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:11022–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Staswick PE, Serban B, Rowe Met al. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. Plant Cell. 2005;17:616–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Brunoni F, Collani S, Casanova-Saez Ret al. Conifers exhibit a characteristic inactivation of auxin to maintain tissue homeostasis. New Phytol. 2020;226:1753–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kowalczyk M, Sandberg G. Quantitative analysis of indole-3-acetic acid metabolites in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;127:1845–53. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. LeClere S, Tellez R, Rampey RAet al. Characterization of a family of IAA-amino acid conjugate hydrolases from Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:20446–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Hayashi KI, Arai K, Aoi Yet al. The main oxidative inactivation pathway of the plant hormone auxin. Nat Commun. 2021;12:6752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Liu Xet al. A role for a dioxygenase in auxin metabolism and reproductive development in rice. Dev Cell. 2013;27:113–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Porco S, Pencik A, Rashed Aet al. Dioxygenase-encoding AtDAO1 gene controls IAA oxidation and homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:11016–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Nakazawa M, Yabe N, Ichikawa Tet al. DFL1, an auxin-responsive GH3 gene homologue, negatively regulates shoot cell elongation and lateral root formation, and positively regulates the light response of hypocotyl length. Plant J. 2001;25:213–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Du H, Wu N, Fu Jet al. A GH3 family member, OsGH3-2, modulates auxin and abscisic acid levels and differentially affects drought and cold tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:6467–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhang SW, Chen-Hui L, Cao Jet al. Altered architecture and enhanced drought tolerance in rice via the down-regulation of indole-3-acetic acid by TLD1/OsGH3.13 activation. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:1889–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Kirungu JN, Magwanga RO, Lu Pet al. Functional characterization of Gh_A08G1120 (GH3.5) gene reveal their significant role in enhancing drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. BMC Genet. 2019;20:62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Jiang L, Zhang D, Liu Cet al. MdGH36 is targeted by MdMYB94 and plays a negative role in apple water-deficit stress tolerance. Plant J. 2022;109:1271–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Li K, Liu Z, Xing Let al. miRNAs associated with auxin signaling, stress response, and cellular activities mediate adventitious root formation in apple rootstocks. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;139:66–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Yao JL, Xu J, Corille Aet al. A microRNA allele that emerged prior to apple domestication may underlie fruit size evolution. Plant J. 2015;84:417–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell. 1994;78:203–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Devoghalaere F, Douen T, Guitton Bet al. A genomics approach to understanding the role of auxin in apple (Malus × domestica) fruit size control. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Gillaspy G, Ben-David H, Gruissem W. Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell. 1993;5:1439–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Liu X, Li J, Huang Met al. Mechanisms for the influence of citrus rootstocks on fruit size. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:2618–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Ripoll JJ, Zhu M, Brocke Set al. Growth dynamics of the Arabidopsis fruit is mediated by cell expansion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:25333–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Vadez V, Kholova J, Medina Set al. Transpiration efficiency: new insights into an old story. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:6141–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LGet al. Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. Eur J Plant Physiol. 2004;55:2343–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Yamaguchi M, Sharp RE. Complexity and coordination of root growth at low water potentials: recent advances from transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:590–603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Zhao D, Wang Y, Feng Cet al. Overexpression of MsGH3.5 inhibits shoot and root development through the auxin and cytokinin pathways in apple plants. Plant J. 2020;103:166–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Dharmappa PM, Doddaraju P, Malagondanahalli MVet al. Introgression of root and water use efficiency traits enhances water productivity: an evidence for physiological breeding in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Rice. 2019;12:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Zhang Z, Cao B, Gao Set al. Grafting improves tomato drought tolerance through enhancing photosynthetic capacity and reducing ROS accumulation. Protoplasma. 2019;256:1013–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kundariya H, Yang X, Morton Ket al. MSH1-induced heritable enhanced growth vigor through grafting is associated with the RdDM pathway in plants. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Yu N, Cao L, Yuan Let al. Maintenance of grafting-induced epigenetic variations in the asexual progeny of Brassica oleracea and B. juncea chimera. Plant J2018;96:22–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Zhang P, Duo T, Wang Fet al. De novo transcriptome in roots of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) reveals gene expression dynamic and act network under alkaline salt stress. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Zhang D, Yang K, Kan Zet al. The regulatory module MdBT2-MdMYB88/MdMYB124-MdNRTs regulates nitrogen usage in apple. Plant Physiol. 2021;185:1924–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Tyree M, Yang S, Cruiziat Pet al. Novel methods of measuring hydraulic conductivity of tree root systems and interpretation using AMAIZED. Plant Physiol. 1994;104:189–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Wei C, Tyree M, Steudle E. Direct measurement of xylem pressure in leaves of intact maize plants. A test of the cohesion-tension theory taking hydraulic architecture into consideration. Plant Physiol. 1999;121:1191–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Web_Material_uhac122
Click here for additional data file. (301.2KB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

Sequence information used in this article can be found in the Genome Database for Rosaceae with the following gene numbers: MDP0000281079 (Mdm-miRNA172p), MDP0000137561 (MdAP2), MDP0000268306 (MdARF6), MDP0000681724 (MdEXP1), and MDP0000560112 (MdEXP10).

Articles from Horticulture Research are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES