Skip to main content
Clinical Case Reports logoLink to Clinical Case Reports
. 2022 Aug 3;10(8):e6187. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.6187

Dominant omodysplasia—A sporadic case—A new case report and review of the literature

Aidin Arabzadeh 1, Behnam Baghianimoghadam 1,, Mohammad Hossein Nabian 2, Yousef Fallah 3, Mohammad Mehdi Ebrahimnasab 1
PMCID: PMC9347672  PMID: 35937024

Abstract

Omodysplasia is an extremely rare skeletal dysplasia. Since introducing this phenotype as a new syndrome, ten cases of the autosomal dominant type of this disease have been reported. Here, we present a new patient and review published articles in this field to provide a clinical diagnostic criterion.

Keywords: criteria, diagnosis, dominant omodysplasia

1. INTRODUCTION

Omodysplasia is a rare skeletal dysplasia characterized by short limbs (especially short upper limbs) and craniofacial dysmorphism (including hypertelorism and a depressed nasal bridge with a short nose and a long philtrum). Both autosomal recessive (OMOD1; OMIM 258315) and dominant types (OMOD2; OMIM 164745) are described. Therefore, genetic transmission and genetic heterogeneity are important. 1 , 2 , 3 , 4

Homozygous or heterozygous compound mutations have been observed in the heparan‐sulfate proteoglycan glypican six gene (GPC6) in the recessive type 3. De novo Heterozygous nonsense mutations (p.Trp548 *) in the FZD2 gene have also recently been described for the dominant type. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8

Since introducing this phenotype as a new syndrome, 10 cases of the autosomal dominant type of this disease have been reported. In this case report, we present a new patient. We also review published articles in this field to provide a clinical diagnostic criterion.

1.1. Case presentation

The patient was a 6‐year‐old boy from a non‐consanguineous marriage who had been referred to a hand surgery clinic due to a short both upper limbs. The patient was an Afghan refugee living in Iran. Complete information on the patient's condition at birth was not available. Based on a history taken from the patient's mother, there was no history of such a problem in any patient's family members. The patient's mother and father were healthy.

He has a history of cleft lip surgery in infancy. He also had gastroesophageal reflux disease and underwent surgery. On examination, short arms were overt. Shoulder and hand movements were regular. There was an impaired left elbow extension (about 30 degrees flexion contracture), but no problem in the right elbow was seen. Both sides' forearm supination and pronation movements were normal (87 degrees supination and pronation for both sides).

In the genital examination, the patient had micropenis and cryptorchidism, which needed surgery, and was referred to a pediatric surgeon.

The patient had 147 cm height (about 50 percentile based on WHO height for age chart 9 ), and his intelligence was normal.

Also, dysmorphic facial features were seen, including a prominent forehead, round face, hypertelorism, a depressed nasal bridge with a short nose and a long philtrum, bilateral cleft lip, and anteverted nares.

In the radiographic study, both humeruses were short. The condyles, especially the left condyle, were hypoplastic and had a distally tapered view. There was a bilateral dislocation of the upper radioulnar joint. In radiography, the first metacarpal was short bilaterally. The lower limb radiograph was normal (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Characteristics of patient. Short humerus, dysmorphic facial features including a large forehead, round face, hypertelorism, depressed nasal bridge with short nose and a long philtrum, cleft lip, and anteverted Nares. The height of patient was normal (A), limited extension in left elbow (B), short first metacarpal on right hand radiography (C), Bilateral radial head dislocation and proximal radioulnar joint disatasis in chest X‐ray (D). Normal hip radiography (E). The C and E radiographies are for when the patient was 4‐year‐old

2. DISCUSSION

In 1989, Maroteaux and colleagues 1 first described omodysplasia syndrome by introducing five patients. The common features of all these patients were short humerus, dislocation and diastasis of the upper radioulnar joint, and similar abnormal craniofacial symptoms.

Two patients in this study were previously diagnosed with Robinow syndrome. 10 The first three patients in the Maroteaux study were not of short stature. According to the authors, a mother and child among them reinforced the suspicion of autosomal dominant inheritance. Despite being similar in their upper limbs to the first three, the following two patients also had short lower limbs and were micromelic dwarfs. They appeared to be autosomal recessively involved.

All patients had some degree of genitalia disorder, and the authors even explained differences in the upper limb phenotype of the first three patients with the next two. For example, the first metacarpal was short in the first three patients, while the following two patients had a normal first metacarpals. 1

Venditti and colleagues 2 identified a mother and son who had symptoms similar to the first three patients in the Maroteaux study. Venditti confirmed that in boys with dominant omodysplasia, genital hypoplasia is a significant symptom. This symptom was also seen in Maroteaux patients. Hypoplasia of the labia majora and clitoris was also seen in the female patient of the Venditti study. The development of motor and intelligence in the mother was completely normal, and there was no previous family history.

Many patients with omodysplasia were previously diagnosed with Robinow syndrome. 8 Robinow syndrome was first described as an autosomal dominant disease. 11 Later, the autosomal recessive type was introduced. 12 There are many similar phenotypic symptoms between the two syndromes. The main symptoms of Robinow syndrome include the followings: mesomelic brachymelia, hypoplastic genitalia, craniofacial anomalies (i.e., hypertelorism, short‐upturned nose, anteverted nose, frontal bossing, and broad nasal bridge). Short stature is ordinary. Radiographs show spinal abnormalities, rib abnormalities, radial head dislocation, brachydactylia, and bifid terminal phalanges. 13 In patients with dominant omodysplasia, height is often standard, the elbow is always abnormal, the first metacarpal is short, and patients have isolated upper extremity rhizomelic brachymelia.

The autosomal recessive type of omodysplasia is associated with severe short stature and developmental delay. At the same time, the height is normal or close to normal in the dominant type, and the patient's intelligence is also normal. The normal first metacarpal length and the presence of bulky proximal end and distal hypoplasia of the femur in radiography (club‐like appearance) are in favor of the autosomal recessive type of omodysplasia. 14

Saal et al. 5 introduced a new mother and daughter with dominant omodysplasia. By genetically examining and whole‐exome sequencing and comparing them with non‐involved family members, they found a new mutation in an FZD2 in the affected individuals.

This gene mutation was confirmed in three other studies by Türkmen S, 6 Warren HE, 7 and Nagasaki K. 8 Türkmen, 6 as well as Saal, 7 had bilateral cleft lip or palate in their patients. This problem was not mentioned in previously reported patients. Our patient also had a history of cleft lip surgery.

The presence of the short first metacarpal is a typical finding in autosomal dominant omodysplasia. However, Türkmen and Venditti have also reported the presence of a shortened middle phalanx of the 5th finger in their patients, which was not mentioned in previous patients and our patient.

Genital hypoplasia is seen in almost all male patients and some female patients. Our patient also had a micropenis. The complete clinical features of all reported cases are presented in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Clinical feature of OMD2 patients

feature Present patient Nagasaki et al (2018) Turkmen et al (2017) Saal et al (2015) Gordon et al (2014) Venditti et al (2002) Maroteaux et al. (1998)
Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3
Age of last examination 6 years 15 years 21 years 25 years 6 years 48 years 25 years 1 month newborn 27 years 10 years
Sex M M F F M F F M M F F
Height, Percentile 25 25 <5 10 <5 <5 25 25 5 10 10
Facial feature
Round face + + + + + NA + NA +
Prominent forehead + + + + + + + + +
Hypertelorism + + + + + + +
Broad nasal bridge + + + + + + + + +
Small nose with broad nasal tip + + + + + + + + + +
Long philtrum + + + + + + +
Microretrognathia + + + + +
Cleft lip/palate + + +
Skeletal features
Short humeri + + + + + + + + + + +
Radial dislocation + + + + + + + + + + +
Limited elbow joints + NA + + + + NA + + +
Short ulnae + NA + + + + + +
Short first metacarpal bones + + + NA + + + + + + +
Short fibulae + NA +
Genital anomalies + + + + + + +
FZD2 mutation NA (c.1640C>A, p.S547*) c.1301G>T (p.Gln434Val) c.1644G>A (p.Trp548*) NA NA NA NA NA NA

Note: Facial features, radial head dislocation, short first metacarpal, short humeri, and genital anomalies in male patients are frequently reported.

Abbreviation: NA, not Assessed.

In his study, Türkmen 6 finally presented a diagnostic triad for autosomal dominant omodysplasia:

  • Short upper limb with radial head dislocation and limited elbow extension.

  • The first short metacarpal.

  • The typical shape of the face (includes a prominent forehead and a short nose with a depressed broad nasal bridge).

According to what has been reported, the following two items can be added to this triad: (4) normal or close to normal height and (5) normal intelligence.

This pentad can be considered the diagnostic criterion of autosomal dominant type omodysplasia.

Genital disorders such as micropenis in male patients can be added to this criterion. Patients may or may not have a cleft lip or palate.

Due to the rarity of this disease, the diagnosis is more clinical than the laboratory. Therefore, the presence of this diagnostic criterion should raise suspicion about the existence of this syndrome. However, according to the existing research, the presence of a mutation in FZD2 and genetic testing can confirm the diagnosis.

2.1. Learning points

  • We suggest the diagnostic pentad of (1) short upper limb with radial head dislocation and limited elbow extension, (2) the short first metacarpal, (3) the typical shape of the face (prominent forehead, short nose, and depressed broad nasal bridge), (4) standard height, and (5) normal intelligence for diagnosis of the autosomal dominant type omodysplasia.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Aidin Arabzadeh and Behnam Baghianimoghadam had contribution in conception of the work, wrote the manuscript and translated it. Mohammad Hossein Nabian, Mohammad Mehdi Ebrahimnasab, and Yousef Fallah revised and approved the manuscript scientifically for submission.

FUNDING INFORMATION

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Not declared.

CONSENT

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients' parents to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

None.

Arabzadeh A, Baghianimoghadam B, Nabian MH, Fallah Y, Ebrahimnasab MM. Dominant omodysplasia—A sporadic case—A new case report and review of the literature. Clin Case Rep. 2022;10:e06187. doi:  10.1002/ccr3.6187

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Maroteaux P, Sauvegrain J, Chrispin A, Farriaux JP. Omodysplasia. Am J Med Genet. 1989;32:371‐375. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320320321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Venditti CP, Farmer J, Russell KL, et al. Omodysplasia: an affected mother and son. Am J Med Genet. 2002;111:169‐177. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.10555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Campos‐Xavier AB, Martinet D, Bateman J, et al. Mutations in the heparan‐sulfate proteoglycan glypican 6 (GPC6) impair endochondral ossification and cause recessive omodysplasia. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:760‐770. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Gordon BL, Champaigne NL, Rogers RC, Frias JL, Leroy JG. Long‐term observation of a patient with dominant omodysplasia. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:1234‐1238. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Saal HM, Prows CA, Guerreiro I, et al. A mutation in FRIZZLED2 impairs Wnt signaling and causes autosomal dominant omodysplasia. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:3399‐3409. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Türkmen S, Spielmann M, Güneş N, et al. A novel de novo FZD2 mutation in a patient with autosomal dominant Omodysplasia. Mol Syndromol. 2017;8:318‐324. doi: 10.1159/000479721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Warren HE, Louie RJ, Friez MJ, et al. Two unrelated patients with autosomal dominant omodysplasia and FRIZZLED2 mutations. Clin Case Rep. 2018;6:2252‐2255. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nagasaki K, Nishimura G, Kikuchi T, et al. Nonsense mutations in FZD2 cause autosomal‐dominant omodysplasia: Robinow syndrome‐like phenotypes. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:739‐742. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. World Health Organization . Height‐for‐age (5‐19 years). Accessed July 25, 2022. https://www.who.int/tools/growth‐reference‐data‐for‐5to19‐years/indicators/height‐for‐age
  • 10. Vallée L, Van Nerom PY, Ferraz FG, et al. Syndrome de robinow à transmission dominante [Robinow's syndrome with dominant transmission]. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1982;39:447‐448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Robinow M, Silverman FN, Smith HD. A newly recognized dwarfing syndrome. Am J Dis Child. 1969;117:645‐651. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1969.02100030647005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Afzal AR, Rajab A, Fenske CD, et al. Recessive Robinow syndrome, allelic to dominant brachydactyly type B, is caused by mutation of ROR2. Nat Genet. 2000;25:419‐422. doi: 10.1038/78107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Mazzeu JF, Brunner HG. 50 years of Robinow syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2020;182:2005‐2007. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Elçioglu NH, Gustavson KH, Wilkie AO, Yüksel‐Apak M, Spranger JW. Recessive omodysplasia: five new cases and review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol. 2004;34:75‐82. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-1064-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.


Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES