Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Jun 2;141(2):321–349. [Article in Spanish] doi: 10.1111/ilrs.12245

Actividades esenciales, trabajo a distancia y vigilancia digital. Estrategias para hacer frente al panóptico de la pandemia de COVID‐19

Antonio ALOISI 1,✉, Valerio DE STEFANO 2
PMCID: PMC9347832

Resumen

La expansión de la vigilancia digital a raíz de la COVID‐19 ha reconfigurado las relaciones de poder en los entornos profesionales. Aquí se analiza críticamente la interacción entre esa vigilancia intrusiva y la ampliación de las prerrogativas empresariales en el lugar de trabajo físico y digital. Con la supervisión excesiva como denominador común de las actividades «esenciales» y «distanciables», se estudian los inconvenientes para ambas categorías de trabajadores durante la pandemia (y después). Se evalúa la idoneidad del marco jurídico de la Unión Europea para abordar la gestión basada en datos. El diálogo social, el empoderamiento de los trabajadores y la alfabetización digital se consideran formas eficaces de promover la flexibilidad, el bienestar y la competitividad.

Palabras clave: trabajadores esenciales, teletrabajo, vigilancia digital, COVID‐19, gestión algorítmica, vigilancia de los trabajadores, prerrogativas empresariales, negociación colectiva

 

La contribución de Antonio Aloisi se realiza en el marco del proyecto «Boss Ex Machina», que ha recibido financiación del Programa Marco de Investigación e Innovación Horizonte 2020 de la Unión Europea, en virtud del acuerdo de subvención Marie Skłodowska‐Curie núm. 893888. La contribución de Valerio De Stefano se ha realizado en el marco de la beca Odysseus sobre «Employment rights and labour protection in the on‐demand economy», concedida por la Research Foundation de Flandes (FWO).

La responsabilidad de las opiniones expresadas en los artículos solo incumbe a sus autores, y su publicación en la Revista Internacional del Trabajo no significa que la OIT las suscriba.

Artículo original: «Essential jobs, remote work and digital surveillance: Addressing the COVID‐19 pandemic panopticon». International Labour Review 161 (2). Traducción de Marta Pino Moreno. Traducido también al francés en Revue internationale du Travail 161 (2).

Contributor Information

Antonio ALOISI, Email: antonio.aloisi@ie.edu.

Valerio DE STEFANO, Email: vdestefano@osgoode.yorku.ca.

Bibliografía citada

  1. Adams‐Prassl, Abigail , Boneva Teodora, Golin Marta y Rauh Christopher. 2020. «Inequality in the Impact of the Coronavirus Shock: Evidence from Real Time Surveys», CEPR Discussion Paper No. 14665. Londres: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  2. Adams‐Prassl, Jeremias . 2019. «What if Your Boss Was an Algorithm? Economic Incentives, Legal Challenges, and the Rise of Artificial Intelligence at Work». Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 41 (1): 123–146. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ajunwa, Ifeoma , Crawford Kate y Schultz Jason. 2017. «Limitless Worker Surveillance». California Law Review 105 (3): 735–776. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ajunwa, Ifeoma , y Greene Daniel. 2019. «Platforms at Work: Automated Hiring Platforms and Other New Intermediaries in the Organization of Work». En Work and Labor in the Digital Age, editado por Vallas Steven P. y Kovalainen Anne, 61–91. Bingley: Emerald. [Google Scholar]
  5. Allen, Robin , y Masters Dee. 2021. Technology Managing People: The Legal Implications. Londres: Congreso de Sindicatos. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aloisi, Antonio . 2022. «Platform Work in Europe: Lessons Learned, Legal Developments and Challenges Ahead». European Labour Law Journal 13 (1): 4–29. [Google Scholar]
  7. Aloisi, Antonio , y De Stefano Valerio. 2022. Your Boss Is an Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence, Platform Work and Labour. Oxford: Hart. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aloisi, Antonio , y Gramano Elena. 2019. «Artificial Intelligence Is Watching You at Work. Digital Surveillance, Employee Monitoring and Regulatory Issues in the EU Context». Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 41 (1): 95–121. [Google Scholar]
  9. Aneesh, A. 2002. «Technologically Coded Authority: The Post‐Industrial Decline in Bureaucratic Hierarchies». Ponencia presentada en la 7.a Universidad Internacional de Verano de Estudios Tecnológicos, Deutschlandsberg, Austria, 27–31 de agosto de 2002.
  10. Bender, Felix , y Ulceluse Magdalena. 2020. «Valuing Life Differently: Migrants and the Coronavirus Crisis». Social Europe, 1 de mayo de 2020. https://www.socialeurope.eu/valuing-life-differently-migrants-and-the-coronavirus-crisis.
  11. Benner, Chris , Mason Sarah, Carré Françoise y Tilly Chris. 2020. Delivering Insecurity: E‐commerce and the Future of Work in Food Retail. Berkeley: UC Berkeley Labor Center y Working Partnerships USA. [Google Scholar]
  12. Bittle, Jake . 2020. «Your Boss Wants to Know whether You Washed Your Hands». Slate, 5 de mayo de 2020. https://slate.com/technology/2020/05/rfid-technology-handwashing-social-distancing-coronavirus-workplace.html.
  13. Blau, Francine D. , Koebe Josefine y Meyerhofer Pamela A.. 2020. «Who Are the Essential and Frontline Workers?». NBER Working Paper No. 27791. Cambridge (Estados Unidos): National Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. Bodie, Matthew T. , Cherry Miriam A., McCormick Marcia L. y Tang Jintong. 2017. «The Law and Policy of People Analytics». University of Colorado Law Review 88 (4): 961–1042. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bodie, Matthew T. , y McMahon Michael. 2021. «Employee Testing, Tracing, and Disclosure as a Response to the Coronavirus Pandemic». Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 64 (1): 31–61. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bonacini, Luca , Gallo Giovanni y Scicchitano Sergio. 2021. «Working from Home and Income Inequality: Risks of a “New Normal” with COVID‐19». Journal of Population Economics 34 (1): 303–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Browne, Ryan . 2020. «The Gadgets and Software that Could Help Us Return to the Office». CNBC, 3 de agosto de 2020. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/03/the-gadgets-and-software-that-could-help-us-return-to-the-office.html.
  18. Burdin, Gabriel , Halliday Simon D. y Landini Fabio. 2020. «Why Using Technology to Spy on Home‐Working Employees May be a Bad Idea». Qrius, 19 de julio de 2020. https://qrius.com/why-using-technology-to-spy-on-home-working-employees-may-be-a-bad-idea/.
  19. CES (Confederación Europea de Sindicatos) . 2020. «COVID‐19 Watch ETUC Briefing on New Technologies Allowing More Surveillance at Work», COVID‐19 Watch/ETUC Briefing Note, 30 de septiembre de 2020. Bruselas. https://www.etuc.org/sites/default/files/publication/file/2020-12/20200930_covid-19%20Briefing%20on%20survelliance%20technologies.pdf.
  20. Cetrulo, Armanda , Guarascio Dario y Virgillito Maria Enrica. 2020. «The Privilege of Working from Home at the Time of Social Distancing». Intereconomics 55 (3): 142–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chesler, Caren . 2020. «Coronavirus Will Turn Your Office into a Surveillance State». Wired, 4 de mayo de 2020. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/coronavirus-work-office-surveillance.
  22. Collins, Hugh . 2018. «Is the Contract of Employment Illiberal?». En Philosophical Foundations of Labour Law, editado por Collins Hugh, Lester Gillian y Mantouvalou Virginia, 48–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  23. Cyphers, Bennett , y Gullo Karen. 2020. «Inside the Invasive, Secretive “Bossware” Tracking Workers». Electronic Frontier Foundation, 30 de junio de 2020. https://www.eff.org/it/deeplinks/2020/06/inside-invasive-secretive-bossware-tracking-workers.
  24. Deakin, Simon . 2002. «The Many Futures of the Contract of Employment». En Labour Law in an Era of Globalization: Transformative Practices and Possibilities, editado por Conaghan Joanne, Fischl Richard Michael y Klare Karl, 177–196. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Deakin, Simon , y Novitz Tonia. 2020. «Covid‐19, Labour Law, and the Renewal of the Social State». Industrial Law Journal 49 (4): 493–496. [Google Scholar]
  26. DeFilippis, Evan , Impink Stephen Michael, Singell Madison, Polzer Jeffrey T. y Sadun Raffaella. 2020. «Collaborating during Coronavirus: The Impact of COVID‐19 on the Nature of Work», NBER Working Paper No. 27612. Cambridge (Estados Unidos): National Bureau of Economic Research.
  27. Delfino, Gianluca F. , y van der Kolk Berend. 2021. «Remote Working, Management Control Changes and Employee Responses during the COVID‐19 Crisis». Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 34 (6): 1376–1387. [Google Scholar]
  28. De Stefano, Valerio . 2018. «“Negotiating the Algorithm”: Automation, Artificial Intelligence and Labour Protection», Employment Working Paper No. 246. Ginebra: OIT.
  29. De Stefano, Valerio . 2020. «“Masters and Servers”: Collective Labour Rights and Private Government in the Contemporary World of Work». International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 36 (4): 425–444. [Google Scholar]
  30. De Stefano, Valerio, y Mathias Wouters . De próxima publicación. «AI and Digital Tools in Workplace Management Evaluation: An Assessment of the EU's Legal Framework». Estudio encargado por el Grupo de Expertos sobre el Futuro de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (2022). Bruselas: Unidad de Prospectiva Científica, Servicio de Estudios del Parlamento Europeo. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dingel, Jonathan I. , y Neiman Brent. 2020. «How Many Jobs Can Be Done at Home?», NBER Working Paper No. 26948. Cambridge (Estados Unidos): National Bureau of Economic Research.
  32. Drozdiak, Natalia , y Fouquet Helene. 2020. «Creepy Technologies Invade European Workplaces». Bloomberg, 19 de mayo de 2020. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-05-20/creepy-technologies-invade-european-post-pandemic-workplaces.
  33. Edwards, Richard . 1979. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. Nueva York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ekbia, Hamid R. , y Nardi Bonnie A.. 2017. Heteromation, and Other Stories of Computing and Capitalism. Cambridge (Estados Unidos): MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Estlund, Cynthia . 2018. «Rethinking Autocracy at Work», reseña del libro Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don't Talk About It), por Elizabeth Anderson. Harvard Law Review 131 (3): 795–826. [Google Scholar]
  36. Eurofound (Fundación Europea para la Mejora de las Condiciones de Vida y de Trabajo) . 2020a. Employee Monitoring and Surveillance: The Challenges of Digitalisation. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. [Google Scholar]
  37. Eurofound (Fundación Europea para la Mejora de las Condiciones de Vida y de Trabajo) . 2020b. Living, Working and COVID‐19. Luxemburgo: Oficina de Publicaciones de la Unión Europea. [Google Scholar]
  38. Eurofound y OIT . 2019. Trabajar en cualquier momento y en cualquier lugar: consecuencias en el ámbito laboral. Luxemburgo y Ginebra.
  39. Fairwork . 2020. «The Gig Economy and Covid‐19: Looking Ahead». Septiembre de 2020. Oxford.
  40. Fana, Marta , Milasi Santo, Napierala Joanna, Fernández‐Macías Enrique e Vázquez Ignacio González. 2020. «Telework, work organisation and job quality during the COVID‐19 crisis: A qualitative study», JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology, No. 2020/11. Sevilla: Comisión Europea.
  41. Finkin, Matthew W. 2017. «Chapter 7: Privacy and Autonomy». Employee Rights and Employment Policy Journal 21 (2): 589–621. [Google Scholar]
  42. Foucault, Michel . 1975. Surveiller et punir: naissance de la prison. París: Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gamio, Lazaro . 2020. «The Workers Who Face the Greatest Coronavirus Risk». The New York Times, 15 de marzo de 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/15/business/economy/coronavirus-worker-risk.html.
  44. Grupo de Trabajo sobre Protección de Datos del Artículo 29 . 2017. Dictamen 2/2017 sobre el tratamiento de datos en el trabajo. WP249. Bruselas: Comisión Europea. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hafermalz, Ella . 2021. «Out of the Panopticon and into Exile: Visibility and Control in Distributed New Culture Organizations». Organization Studies 42 (5): 697–717. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hanley, Daniel A. , y Hubbard Sally. 2020. «Eyes Everywhere: Amazon's Surveillance Infrastructure and Revitalizing Worker Power». 1 de septiembre de 2020. Washington: Open Markets Institute.
  47. Hare, Stephanie . 2022. Technology Is Not Neutral: A Short Guide to Technology Ethics. Londres: London Publishing Partnership. [Google Scholar]
  48. Harwell, Drew . 2020. «Managers Turn to Surveillance Software, Always‐On Webcams to Ensure Employees Are (Really) Working from Home». The Washington Post, 30 de abril de 2020. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/30/work-from-home-surveillance/.
  49. Hendrickx, Frank . 2019. «Privacy 4.0 at Work: Regulating Employment, Technology and Automation». Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 41 (1): 147–172. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hodder, Andy . 2020. «New Technology, Work and Employment in the Era of COVID‐19: Reflecting on Legacies of Research». New Technology, Work and Employment 35 (3): 262–275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Ivanova, Mirela , Bronowicka Joanna, Kocher Eva y Degner Anne. 2018. «The App as a Boss? Control and Autonomy in Application‐Based Management», Arbeit – Grenze – Fluss – Work in Progress interdisziplinärer Arbeitsforschung No. 2. Fráncfort del Óder: Europa‐Universitat Viadrina.
  52. Katsabian, Tammy . 2019. «Employees' Privacy in the Internet Age: Towards a New Procedural Approach». Berkley Journal of Employment and Labour Law 40 (2): 203–255. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kellogg, Katherine C. , Valentine Melissa A. y Christin Angèle. 2020. «Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control». Academy of Management Annals 14 (1): 366–410. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kelly‐Lyth, Aislinn . 2021. «Challenging Biased Hiring Algorithms». Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 41 (4): 899–928. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kidwell, Roland E. , y Sprague Robert. 2009. «Electronic Surveillance in the Global Workplace: Laws, Ethics, Research and Practice». New Technology, Work and Employment 24 (2): 194–208. [Google Scholar]
  56. Landes, David S. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  57. Lane, Marguerita . 2020. «Regulating Platform Work in the Digital Age», OECD Going Digital Toolkit Policy Note No. 1. París: Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos.
  58. Leonardi, Paul M. 2021. «COVID‐19 and the New Technologies of Organizing: Digital Exhaust, Digital Footprints, and Artificial Intelligence in the Wake of Remote Work». Journal of Management Studies 58 (1): 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lund, Susan , Madgavkar Anu, Manyika James, Smit Sven, Ellingrud Kweilin, Meaney Mary y Robinson Olivia. 2021. The Postpandemic Economy: The Future of Work After COVID‐19. McKinsey Global Institute. [Google Scholar]
  60. Mangan, David , Gramano Elena y Kullmann Miriam. 2020. «An Unprecedented Social Solidarity Stress Test». European Labour Law Journal 11 (3): 247–275. [Google Scholar]
  61. Manganelli, Lara , Thibault‐Landry Anaïs, Forest Jacques y Carpentier Joëlle. 2018. «Self‐Determination Theory Can Help You Generate Performance and Well‐Being in the Workplace: A Review of the Literature». Advances in Developing Human Resources 20 (2): 227–240. [Google Scholar]
  62. Manokha, Ivan . 2019. «New Means of Workplace Surveillance: From the Gaze of the Supervisor to the Digitalization of Employees». Monthly Review 70 (9). https://monthlyreview.org/2019/02/01/new-means-of-workplace-surveillance/. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mateescu, Alexandra , y Elish Madeleine Clare. 2019. «AI in Context: The Labor of Integrating New Technologies». Data & Society, 30 de enero de 2019. https://datasociety.net/library/ai-in-context/.
  64. Mateescu, Alexandra , y Nguyen Aiha. 2019. «Explainer: Workplace Monitoring & Surveillance». Data & Society, 6 de febrero de 2019. https://datasociety.net/library/explainer-workplace-monitoring-surveillance/.
  65. Migliano, Simon , y O'Donnell Christine. 2022. «Employee Surveillance Software Demand up 56 % since Pandemic Started». Top10VPN (sitio web), 10 de febrero de 2022. https://www.top10vpn.com/research/covid-employee-surveillance/.
  66. Mundlak, Guy , y Fudge Judy. 2020. «The Future of Work and The Covid‐19 Crisis». Futures of Work, núm. 14, 5 de junio de 2020. https://futuresofwork.co.uk/2020/06/05/the-future-of-work-and-the-covid-19-crisis/.
  67. Naciones Unidas . 2020. «Informe de políticas: las repercusiones de la COVID‐19 en las mujeres». 9 de abril de 2020. Nueva York.
  68. Nguyen, Aiha . 2020a. «On the Clock and at Home: Post‐COVID‐19 Employee Monitoring in the Workplace». People + Strategy Journal, verano de 2020. https://www.shrm.org/executive/resources/people-strategy-journal/summer2020/Pages/feature-nguyen.aspx/.
  69. Nguyen, Aiha . 2020b. «Watching the Watchers: The New Privacy and Surveillance under COVID‐19». Octubre de 2020. Montreal: Centre for Media, Technology and Democracy, Universidad McGill.
  70. OCDE (Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos) . 2020. «What Have Platforms Done to Protect Workers during the Coronavirus (COVID‐19) Crisis?». 21 de septiembre de 2020. París.
  71. OIT . 2020a. «Observatorio de la OIT: La COVID‐19 y el mundo del trabajo», segunda edición, 7 de abril de 2020. Ginebra.
  72. OIT . 2020b. El teletrabajo durante la pandemia de COVID‐19 y después de ella: guía práctica. Ginebra.
  73. Otto, Marta . 2016. The Right to Privacy in Employment: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Hart. [Google Scholar]
  74. Otto, Marta . 2019. «“Workforce Analytics” V Fundamental Rights Protection in the EU in the Age of Big Data». Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal 40 (3): 389–404. [Google Scholar]
  75. Pakes, Andrew . 2020. «High Visibility and COVID‐19: Returning to the Post‐Lockdown Workplace». Ada Lovelace Institute Blog (blog), 19 de mayo de 2020. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/blog/covid-19-returning-to-post-lockdown-workplace/.
  76. Palmer, Annie . 2020. «How Amazon Keeps a Close Eye on Employee Activism to Head Off Unions». CNBC, 24 de octubre de 2020. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/24/how-amazon-prevents-unions-by-surveilling-employee-activism.html.
  77. Parlamento Europeo . 2020. Data Subjects, Digital Surveillance, AI and the Future of Work. Bruselas.
  78. Ponce del Castillo, Aída . 2020. «Aplicaciones de rastreo de contactos del COVID‐19: cómo evitar que la privacidad se convierta en la próxima víctima», ETUI Policy Brief No. 5/2020. Bruselas: Instituto Sindical Europeo.
  79. Powell, Jessica . 2020. «The Rise of Remote Work Can Be Unexpectedly Liberating». The New York Times, 25 de septiembre de 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/25/opinion/remote-work-from-home-office.html?smid=tw-share.
  80. Putzier, Konrad , y Cutter Chip. 2020. «Welcome Back to the Office. Your Every Move Will Be Watched». The Wall Street Journal, 5 de mayo de 2020. https://www.wsj.com/articles/lockdown-reopen-office-coronavirus-privacy-11588689725.
  81. Rigby, C. Scott , y Ryan Richard M.. 2018. «Self‐Determination Theory in Human Resource Development: New Directions and Practical Considerations». Advances in Developing Human Resources 20 (2): 133–147. [Google Scholar]
  82. Ristuccia, Fulvia , 2020. «Essential Rights for Essential Workers». COVID Blog in Social Sciences (blog), 26 de mayo de 2020. https://covidblogsocialsciences.wordpress.com/2020/05/26/essential-rights-for-essential-workers/.
  83. Rogers, Brishen , 2020. «The Law and Political Economy of Workplace Technological Change». Harvard Civil Rights‐Civil Liberties Law Review 55 (2): 531–584. [Google Scholar]
  84. Rubinstein, Ira S. 2011. «Regulating Privacy by Design». Berkeley Technology Law Journal 26 (3): 1409–1456. [Google Scholar]
  85. Sachs, Benjamin I. 2014. «Privacy as Sphere Autonomy». En Protection of Employees' Personal Information and Privacy, editado por Blanpain Roger, Nakakubo Hiroya y Araki Takashi, 233–247. Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations, vol. 88. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. [Google Scholar]
  86. Samek Lodovici, Manuela (ed.). 2021. «The Impact of Teleworking and Digital Work on Workers and Society». Estudio encargado por la Comisión de Empleo y Asuntos Sociales, Departamento Temático de Políticas Económica y Científicas y de Calidad de Vida. Luxemburgo: Parlamento Europeo. [Google Scholar]
  87. Sarpong, Sam , y Rees Donna. 2014. «Assessing the Effects of “Big Brother” in a Workplace: The Case of WAST». European Management Journal 32 (2): 216–222. [Google Scholar]
  88. Silverman, Jacob . 2020. «Do You Know Your Microsoft Productivity Score?». The New Republic, 25 de noviembre de 2020. https://newrepublic.com/article/160388/microsoft-productivity-score-workplace-analytics-employee-surveillance.
  89. Sostero, Matteo , Milasi Santo, Hurley John, Fernández‐Macías Enrique y Bisello Martina. 2020. «Teleworkability and the COVID‐19 Crisis: A New Digital Divide?», JRC Working Papers Series on Labour, Education and Technology, No. 2020/05. Sevilla: Comisión Europea.
  90. Suder, Seili . 2021. «Processing Employees' Personal Data during the Covid‐19 Pandemic». European Labour Law Journal 12 (3): 322–337. [Google Scholar]
  91. The Economist . 2020. «Covid‐19 Has Forced a Radical Shift in Working Habits». 12 de septiembre de 2020. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/09/12/covid-19-has-forced-a-radical-shift-in-working-habits.
  92. TUC (Congreso de Sindicatos) . 2020. Technology Managing People: The Worker Experience. Londres.
  93. Tucker, Catherine . 2019. «Privacy, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence». En The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, editado por Agrawal Ajay, Gans Joshua y Goldfarb Avi, 423–437. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  94. Whitaker, Reginald . 1999. The End of Privacy: How Total Surveillance Is Becoming a Reality. Nueva York: New Press. [Traducción al español de Luis Prat Clarós. 1999. El fin de la privacidad: cómo la vigilancia total se está convirtiendo en realidad. Barcelona: Paidós.] [Google Scholar]
  95. Zuboff, Shoshana . 2015. «Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization». Journal of Information Technology 30 (1): 75–89. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Revista Internacional del Trabajo are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES