Abstract
Carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) modified with silver particles present an interesting tool in the determination of paraquat (PQ) using square wave voltammetry. Metallic silver particle deposits have been obtained via electrochemical deposition in acidic media using cyclic voltammetry. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction measurements show that the silver particles are deposited onto carbon surfaces in aggregate form. The response of PQ with modified electrode (Ag-CPE) related to Ag/CP loading, preconcentration time, and measuring solution pH was investigated. The result shows that the increase in the two cathodic peak currents (Peak 1 and Peak 2), under optimized conditions, was linear with the increase in PQ concentration in the range 1.0 × 10−7 mol/L to 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L. The detection limit and quantification limit were 2.01 × 10−8 mol/L and 6.073 × 10−8 mol/L, respectively for Peak 1. The precision expressed as relative standard deviation for the concentration level 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L (n = 8) was found to be 1.45%. The methodology was satisfactorily applied for the determination of PQ in citric fruit cultures.
Keywords: citric fruit cultures, electrodeposition, paraquat silver
1. Introduction
Paraquat (1-1dimethyl-4-4-bipiridyl) is a biquaternary ammonium compound that is normally synthesized as the dichloride salt. It was introduced in the 1960s, and today it is used in > 100 countries in plantations of tobacco, apples, and other crops [1]. Paraquat (PQ) is very toxic to all living organisms, and many cases of acute poisoning and death have been reported over the past decade. Numerous studies suggest a link between exposure to PQ and an increased risk for developing Parkinson’s disease (PD) [2]. This herbicide is structurally similar to MPP+ (1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium), the active metabolite of MPTP (1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine), which is known to produce parkinsonian symptoms in drug users [3] and PD pathologies in animals [4]. In addition, a recent epidemiologic study shows the possible correlation between exposure to PQ and PD development in humans [5].
The main suggested potential mechanism for PQ toxicity is the production of superoxide radicals from the metabolism of PQ by microsomal enzyme systems, and by inducing mitochondrial toxicity [6]. Since July 2007, the use of this pesticide in the European Union (EU) has been banned; however, this does not preclude farmers outside the EU from continuing to use PQ and export their products to the EU. Therefore, PQ is included in the EU database between the compounds that should be monitored in food samples, and maximum residue limits have been established for different commodities [7]. Thus, for the case of citric fruit cultures, the maximum residue limit is 20 μg/kg [8]. The detection of PQ and herbicide residues in food samples is hampered owing to their particular physicochemical features and because this process requires the application of specific extraction and analytical procedures. The latter can be limited by interferences from food caused by a species with a similar structure (diquat), even at concentrations of the same order as PQ [9]. Currently, there is an urgent and specific increasing requirement for a more accurate and reliable detection method to cope with the more subtle adulterations in food. Several voltammetric methods have been developed to study the electrochemical behavior of PQ using dental amalgam and mercury [10], bismuth film [11], gold electrode [12,13], pyrolitic graphite [13], chemically modified carbon paste electrode (CPE) [14], and modified film electrodes [15–18]. The use of voltammetric methods has a considerable drawback that is related to the adsorption process of the analyte and/or the resulting products of the electrochemical reactions on the electrode surface. Indeed, low analytical sensitivities and reproducibility of the electroanalytical response were also observed [19,20]. The substantial versatility of carbon electrodes resides in their wide range of possible modifications. In fact, the electrode composition can be modified via the addition of different substances, such as metals, polymers, and enzymes [21–24]. The design of new nanoscale materials has acquired ever-greater importance in recent years owing to their various applications. Among these materials, metallic particles are of great interest because of their numerous properties [25,26]. Numerous methods describing the synthesis of metallic silver particles in solution as well as by deposition on solid surfaces have been presented. These include chemical synthesis by means of reduction with different reagents [27], UV light or electron beam irradiation [28], and electrochemical methods [29–32]. The latter provides an easy and rapid alternative for the preparation of metallic particle electrodes.
Recently, in our laboratory silver was used as a modifier of carbon paste, and we characterized these modified electrodes as sensing probes of PQ [33]. The used electrode was prepared by solid reaction between silver nitrates and carbon powder. However, the obtained silver was found to be supported heterogeneously as agglomerates onto the carbon paste. In this work, in order to overcome this problem, modified electrodes have been employed using the electrochemical deposition of silver from electrolytic solution. This methodology has been successfully applied to determine PQ in food samples, without any prepurification or preparation step of the sample. The modified electrode is compared with other related reports in the literature and is also independently tested with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) toward the sensing of PQ in citric fruit cultures where good agreement is found.
2. Methods
2.1. Reagents
All chemicals used were of analytical grade or of the highest purity available. Sodium sulfate, sodium hydroxide, silver nitrate, acetic acid, and chloridric acid were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), Fluka (St. Gallen, Switzerland), and Riedel de Haen (Seelze, Germany) Chemical Companies and were used as received. PQ ions (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were dissolved in 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4 to prepare stock solutions of 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L. The working standard solutions were prepared by successive dilution of the stock solutions by sodium sulfate. Carbon paste was supplied from Carbone Lorraine (Lorraine, France; ref 9900). All other reagents used were of analytical grade. Distilled water was used throughout the preparation of the solutions.
2.2. Instruments
Cyclic and square wave voltammetry (SWV) were carried out with a voltalab potentiostat (model PGZ 100; Radiometer Analytical Inc., Hegnau, Switzerland) driven by the general-purpose electrochemical systems data processing software (voltalabmaster 4 software). The electrochemical cell was configured to work with three electrodes, using silver-modified carbon paste as the working platinum plate for counter and a system Ag/AgCl (3.00 mol/L) as reference electrodes. The pH meter (Radiometer, SENSION; PH3, Leganés, Spain) was used for adjusting pH values. X-ray diffraction studies of prepared powder Ag/CP were carried out using a diffractometer (XRD: Cu Ka radiation, XPERT-PRO). CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5406 nm) produced at 30 kV and 25 mA scanned the diffraction angles (2θ) between 10° and 80° with a step size of 0.02° 2θ per second. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were performed on an FEI Nova SEM (Philips) instrument with an AMETEK energy dispersive X-ray system (Nova 200) operated at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. Imaging of solids deposited on the 3-mm GC electrodes was performed with the aid of a custom-built electrode holder. Prior to SEM imaging, samples were thoroughly rinsed with acetone and Milli-Q water and dried under a flow of nitrogen.
2.3. Procedure
We describe an easy procedure to obtain silver particle-modified CPE. The method is based on the electrochemical deposition of silver on CPE surface from Britton–Robinson electrolyte (pH 2) containing silver nitrates. The silver deposition on CPE was performed using cyclic voltammetry.
Initially, the electrochemical response of PQ at Ag-CPE is measured. A standard solution of PQ was added into the electrochemical cell containing 40 mL of supporting electrolyte (0.1 mol/L Na2SO4). The mixture solution was kept quiet for 20 seconds at open circuit for each electrochemical measurement. SWV was recorded in the range from −0.3 V to −1.4 V, for which the scan rate is 1 mV/s, the pulse is 50 mV, amplitude is 1 mV, and duration is 1 second. The optimal conditions were established by measuring the current peaks depending on all parameters. The suitability of the electro-analytical method in the determination of PQ in orange juice and orange juice samples was tested under optimal conditions. All experiments were carried out at room temperature and performed in triplicate.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Preparation of silver particle-modified carbon electrodes
Previous experiments [34] showed that very acidic pH values are required to electrodeposit silver on CPEs. For this reason, pH 2 Britton–Robinson solution was used for modified electrode preparation. Silver electrodeposition was performed with cyclic voltammetry between different potential ranges for 1.5 cycles in a solution containing 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L AgNO3 and Britton–Robinson buffer (pH 2.0). A carbon electrode was used for the deposition of silver. Fig. 1 shows the SEM image of Ag/CP pastes prepared in a sweeping potential range of −1.4 V to 0.0 V. The SEM images show the formation of silver particles on the carbon surface, indicating that they are deposited in aggregated form. The X-ray diffraction analysis of carbon paste after electrochemical deposition of silver on the working-electrode surface shows the formation of silver particles on the carbon surface. However, the presence of three peaks of metallic silver at 2θ of 38.18, 46.62, and 66.42 affirms the metallic state of the coated silver as seen in Fig. 1 according to the literature [35].
Fig. 1.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and imagery by scanning electron microscopy of CP and Ag/CP after electrodeposition step.
The voltammograms of PQ obtained at unmodified and modified CPE are shown in Fig. 2 as curve 1 and curve 3, respectively. At the CPE, in the potential range scanned from −0.3 to −1.3 V, a fairly small peak current due to reduction of PQ was observed. On the other side, the electrochemical response of PQ that occurred at the silver-modified CPE is much more distinguishable. The result indicates that silver can considerably promote the preconcentration of PQ at the CPE and significantly increase the sensitivity of the determination of PQ. The performance of the newly developed silver-modified CPE is based on the accumulation of PQ from the aqueous solution onto the surface of the modified electrode.
Fig. 2.
Influence of the experimental variables of the electrodeposition (scan rate, sweeping potential range, cycle number, concentration of silver in electrolytic solution) and of measurement conditions on square wave responses of paraquat (PQ), [PQ] = 1.0 × 10−4 mol/L Ag-CPE, pH 2.
3.2. Optimization of experimental conditions
3.2.1. Effect of silver electrodeposition conditions on PQ responses
The influence of the experimental variables of electrodeposition (scan rate, sweeping potential range, cycle number, concentration of silver in electrolytic solution) involved in the SWV determination of PQ was investigated.
The effect of the scan rate of electrodeposition of silver particles on the SWV response of PQ was studied in a solution containing 1.0 × 10−4 mol/L of PQ in the range 1.0–10 mV/s (Fig. 2). The voltammogram of silver deposition was recorded by making a scan cyclic from −1.4 V to 0.0 V with a cycle number of 1.5 in Britton–Robinson buffer at pH 2.0. The highest response obtained was achieved at a scan rate of 3 mV/s. Fig. 2 shows the square wave voltammogram of PQ on the different electrodes, in a solution consisting of 1.0 × 10−4 mol/L and 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4 with pH 7.0. Curve 2 is the square wave voltammogram of PQ on a Ag-CPE electrode prepared in a sweeping potential range of −1.4 V to −0.6 V, in which the peak of the intensity is 43.62 μA. Curve 3 is the cyclic voltammogram of PQ on a Ag-CPE electrode prepared in a sweeping potential range of −1.4 V to 0.0 V, in which the peak of the intensity is 86.31 μA, which is much higher than that in curve 2. Curve 4 is square wave voltammogram of PQ on Ag-CPE electrode prepared in a sweeping potential range of − 1.4 V to 0.3 V, in which the peak of the intensity is 79.45 μA. Curve 5 is the square wave voltammogram of PQ on Ag-CPE electrode prepared in a sweeping potential range of −1.4 V to 0.6 V, in which the peak of the intensity is 61.56 μA. This result demonstrates that the Ag-CPE electrode prepared in a sweeping potential range of −1.4 V to 0.0 V can be efficient for of the detection of PQ. The oxidative removal of silver from electrode surfaces may be complicated because of the formation of some surface oxides on silver during the oxidation scan. This may account for the lack of full chemical reversibility [36].
The highest peak intensity was reached for the total cyclic potential of 1.5 cycles. It has been observed that a poor response for PQ is obtained when the number of cycles exceeds 1.5 cycles, and as expected, electrodeposition of silver on electrode paste carbon did not occur further and the paste of carbon was dispersed in the solution. Hence, for all subsequent measurements, a scan rate of 3 mV/s with a cycle number of 1.5 in the sweeping potential range −1.4 V to 0.0 V was used to prepare silver particles on CPE.
The concentration of silver was optimized with addition of different volumes of 5.0 in a solution consisting of 10−2 mol/L AgNO3 into 40 mL cells containing Britton–Robinson buffer under the following conditions: pH, 2; scan rate, 3 mV/s; number of cycles, 1.5. As shown in Fig. 2, the highest peak intensity was reached for 0.4 mmol AgNO3. It has been observed that a poor response for PQ is obtained for high concentrations of AgNO3. This behavior was attributed to the formation of a partial silver film on CPE [34].
3.2.2. Effect of measurement conditions on square wave responses
The response of the Ag-CPE was highly pH dependent. The effect of pH was studied over a pH range between 3.0 and 12.0 in Na2SO4 solution containing 1.0 × 10−4 mol/L PQ. The optimum pH range was found between 7.14 and 8.71, with a maximum response at pH 7.50. The sensitivity decrease in acidic solution was accompanied with a decrease in reduction peaks, which is in close agreement with published results [37].
The effect of preconcentration time on SWV measurements was studied in solutions (pH 7.8) containing 1.0 × 10−4 mol/L of PQ at Ag-CPE. The current intensity increased abruptly to reach a maximum at 10 minutes of accumulation after surface saturations. Normally, the increase in the response current continued until a maximum signal level (presumably corresponding to either saturation or an equilibrium surface coverage) is attained. Hence, a 10-minute preconcentration time was used in all subsequent experiments.
3.3. Factorial design for screening variables associated with analysis of PQ
The combination of the variable levels in each run used in the 25 full factorial designs as well as the analytical signal (peak current) were investigated (Table 1) In this work, the peak current was used as an analytical response for the evaluation of the proposed analytical procedure. This parameter is more coherent in the case where scan rate and the concentration of silver play a significant role in the electrical response. The effects of factors (bi) and interaction effects between factors (bij) were obtained from statistical tests on the coefficients using the variance estimated from replicates.
Table 1.
Estimated values of coefficients for response yield.
| Coefficient | Standard error | t. exp. | Significance (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b 0 | 31.236 | 0.730 | 42.77 | <0.01 *** |
| b 1 | −1.863 | 0.730 | −2.55 | 2.05 * |
| b 2 | 1.507 | 0.730 | 2.06 | 5.3 |
| b 3 | 7.949 | 0.730 | 10.88 | < 0.01 *** |
| b 4 | 0.182 | 0.730 | 0.25 | 80.1 |
| b 5 | 1.396 | 0.730 | 1.91 | 7.1 |
| b 12 | 0.240 | 0.730 | 0.33 | 74.4 |
| b 13 | −2.209 | 0.730 | −3.02 | 0.788 ** |
| b 23 | 1.620 | 0.730 | 2.22 | 3.95 * |
| b 14 | −0.549 | 0.730 | −0.75 | 46.9 |
| b 24 | −1.084 | 0.730 | −1.48 | 15.4 |
| b 34 | −1.124 | 0.730 | −1.54 | 14.0 |
| b 15 | −0.841 | 0.730 | −1.15 | 26.6 |
| b 25 | −0.370 | 0.730 | −0.51 | 62.4 |
| b 35 | 0.622 | 0.730 | 0.85 | 41.2 |
| b 45 | −0.058 | 0.730 | −0.08 | 93.6 |
Statistically non-significant at the 99% level (p > 0.01).
Statistically significant at the 99% level (p = 0.01).
Statistically very significant at the 99% level (p < 0.01).
b1 = scan rate; b2 = sweeping potential range; b3 = concentration of silver; b4 = pH; b5 = preconcentration time.
The results indicate that increase in the variable levels provides an increase in the electrical response of PQ. However, although the mass of silver makes it possible to increase the sensitivity of the electrode, 0.4 mmol was fixed in order to avoid overweight of silver and the formation of the silver film onto electrode surface. This was expected as the increase in concentration of silver and sweeping potential range would entail a deposition of the silver onto the electrode, which enhanced the sensitivity of the electrode. Concerning the scan rate, the effect of the electrodeposition of the silver onto the CPE is very important. The interaction between sweeping potential, preconcentration time, and effect of pH is not significant. This was verified experimentally (Table 1).
The model has been validated using analysis of the report (FRatio = mean squares regression/mean squares residues) and the correlation coefficient [(R2) = (are square regression/are total sum of squares)0.9061]. The value found in the report (FRatio) was higher than the critical value of Fischer. The regression coefficient is considered significant with a risk of 5%. According to the obtained value of the regression coefficient, we can deduce that the electrode response is strongly dependent on the concentration of silver.
3.4. Calibration graph
Under the optimized conditions, the square wave as a function of PQ concentration was linear between 1.0 × 10−7 mol/L and 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L (Fig. 3). The linear correlation coefficients are 0.9872 and 0.9751 of P1 and P2, respectively. The detection limit (DL) and quantification limit (QL) were 2.01 × 10−8 mol/L and 6.073 × 10−8 mol/L for P1 and 7.9 × 10−8 mol/L and 26.5 × 10−8 mol/L for P2, respectively. The precision of this methodology for the determination of PQ was evaluated for eight successive measurements of the same samples containing 1.0 × 10−5 mol/L PQ. The deviation coefficients were 1.45% and 1.36% for Peaks 1 and 2, respectively. The sensitivity is obviously higher than that of other methods such as spectrophotometry (8.56 × 10−8 mol/L) [9], gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (1.94 × 10−7 mol/L) [38], differential pulse voltammetry (9.3 × 10−8 mol/L) [11], phthalocyanine-based pyrolitic graphite electrode (1.0 × 10−7 mol/L) [17], and gold electrodes (3.9 × 10−8 mol/L) [12]. However, it was comparable to the result obtained with HPLC (1.94 × 10−8 mol/L) [39] and square wave voltammetry (1.0 × 10−8 mol/L) [40].
Fig. 3.
Square-wave voltammograms in 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4, pH 7.5, tp = 10 minutes, at Ag-CPE of different concentrations of PQ: (a) 12.0 × 10−4, (b) 8.0 × 10−4, (c) 7.0 × 10−4, (d) 4.0 × 10−4, (e) 2.0 × 10−4, (f) 1.5 × 10−4, (g) 1.0 × 10−4, (h) 1.0 × 10−5, (i) 1.0 × 10−6, and (j) 1.0 × 10−7. CPE = carbon paste electrode.
3.5. Interference
The effect of foreign species was also studied in the range of 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L to 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L in the presence of 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L PQ in order to evaluate the effect of interferences (Table 2). This was considered when the analytical signal varied > 5% in the presence of foreign species. Table 2 shows that the addition of glyphosate herbicide did not cause changes in the peak PQ; however, it interfered when its concentration is in a 20 × excess. The presence of most citric and ascorbic acids gives rise to a small decrease in the intensity of PQ peak. The obtained results also demonstrated that the second reduction peak of PQ is more likely distorted owing to the presence of these contaminants. The fact that their peaks occur at approximately −1.20 V indicates the presence of a significant interference in the second peak. The presence of most ions (Ca2+, Mg2+, Pb2+, Cd2+, Fe3+, Fe2+, and Cu2+) gives rise to a small decrease in the intensity of PQ peak, because of their precipitation with the generated from electrolytes. KCN should be added in the electrolytic solution to inhibit the interference effects of these ions. We also noticed that stirs competition with PQ, leading to an interaction of with silver-modified CPE and then to a decrease in peak currents of PQ.
Table 2.
Effect of foreign species on paraquat (PQ) analysis.a
| Added species | Concentration (mol/L) × 10−5 | Signal variation (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Peak 1 | Peak 2 | ||
| Ca2+ | 5.0 | −2.59 | −2.17 |
| Mg2+ | 5.0 | −2.73 | −2.05 |
| Fe2+ | 5.0 | −2.66 | −2.61 |
| Cd2+ | 5.0 | −2.83 | −2.92 |
| Cu2+ | 5.0 | −2.65 | −2.51 |
| Pb2+ | 5.0 | −3.22 | −2.56 |
| 10.0 | −3.56 | −2.69 | |
| Fe3+ | 10.0 | −2.75 | −2.63 |
| Glyphosate | 100.0 | +4.43 | +4.04 |
| Citric acid | 100.0 | −3.34 | −5.44 |
| Ascorbic acid | 100.0 | −3.45 | −5.66 |
The PQ concentration was fixed at 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L, and the concentration of the foreign species was varied from 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L to 1.0 × 10−3 mol/L.
3.6. Practical application
3.6.1. Orange samples
The methodology developed in the preceding sections was applied to determine PQ in the orange samples obtained from an agricultural area in the Souss Massa Draa region, Agadir, Morocco. First, 20 g of orange free from pesticides was transferred into an electrochemical cell, then mixed and homogenized and spiked with appropriate amounts of PQ, and then adjusted to pH value of 7.5. The samples were used as received in preparing the supporting electrolyte (adding 0.1 mol/L Na2SO4), and the analytical curves were again obtained using SWV experiments. The analytical sensitivities, defined by the slope of the analytical curves, were compared with those obtained with purified water, where it is possible to observe that the peak current values for the PQ reduction process displayed some influence from the components of the samples used, characterized by a decrease in the slope of the curves obtained. It was found that peak currents P1 and P2 versus PQ added into orange samples increased linearly in the range of 1.0 × 10−6 mol/L to 6.0 × 10−4 mol/L of PQ (Fig. 4). These results indicate that the proposed methodology is suitable for the determination of PQ in samples of commercial orange juice (Table 3). The statistical calculations for the assay results showed the suitable precision of the proposed method. Recovery experiments were also carried out in order to evaluate the interference of matrix effects of the orange samples on the detection of PQ on Ag-CPE. Results obtained for RSD and percentage recovery for the samples spiked with 5.0 × 10−5 mol/L PQ were 2.35% and 90.0%, respectively. The results presented satisfactory values for the proposed electroanalytical methods, thus indicating the suitability of the proposed method for use in orange samples.
Fig. 4.
Calibration curves for paraquat (PQ): (A) orange and (B) commercial orange juice.
Table 3.
Results obtained from linear regression curves for the determination of PQ at Ag-CPE in orange juice samples and commercial orange juice.
| Orange | Commercial orange juice | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||
| P1 | P2 | P1 | P2 | |
| R 2 | 0.987 | 0.993 | 0.983 | 0.992 |
| Slope A (mol−1 L) | 1.082 | 0.541 | 1.049 | 0.500 |
| DL (mol/L) × 10−7 | 2.58 | 4.58 | 5.58 | 7.22 |
| QL (mol/L) × 10−7 | 8.60 | 15.20 | 18.58 | 24.04 |
| RSD (%) | 2.35 | 2.13 | 2.25 | 2.18 |
Ag = silver; CPE = carbon paste electrode; DL = detection limit; PQ = paraquat; QL = quantification limit; RSD = relative standard deviation.
3.6.2. Commercial orange juice
SWV was also used to evaluate the performance of the analytical method to determine PQ in orange juice free from pesticides. The support electrolytes were prepared by addition of 0.1 mol/L of Na2SO4 to orange juice and were adjusted to a pH value of 7.5. The linear calibration curve was obtained in the concentration range of 5.0 × 10−6 mol/L to 6.0 × 10−4 mol/L for PQ (Fig. 4). The correlation coefficient of the curve was 0.983. The DL and QL were 5.58 × 10−7 mol/L and 18.58 × 10−8 mol/L, respectively (Table 3). These results indicate that the proposed method is suitable for the determination of PQ in commercial orange juice samples (Table 3).
When the method was applied to orange samples and commercial orange juice, the concentration of the residues of PQ was found to be lower than the DL. A comparison of the analytical sensibility of the methodology obtained for orange samples and commercial orange juice was investigated. The results showed that the slope of the calibration curve of the commercial orange juice has not changed much; it decreased by 2% relative to the slope of the orange. This can be attributed to the adsorption of the acids present at a slightly higher proportion. HPLC [41] was used to perform the comparison with the results obtained using the proposed voltammetric method. The results presented in Table 4 using the proposed method and the comparative HPLC method are in good agreement at a confidence level of 95% (F test and paired t test) and in agreement with the Environmental Protection Agency [42] and Health Canadian Agency [43]. Using SWV, the background currents in lemon and orange were intense and not flat. This behavior is attributable to the presence of other matrix electroactive components, which—in the case of citric fruits—are basically ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and citric acid, which can inhibit the detection process of PQ at silver surfaces.
Table 4.
Paraquat (PQ) determination in spiked samples.a
| Samples | Ag-CPE | HPLC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||
| Added (mol/L) ×10−5 | PQ(II) found (mol/L) × 10−5 | Recovery (%) | PQ(II) found (mol/L) × 10−5 | Recovery (%) | |
| Orange | 4 | 3.53 | 88.25 ± 18.43 | 3.68 | 92.00 |
| Orange | 6 | 5.34 | 89.00 ± 17.88 | 5.76 | 96.00 |
| Commercial orange juice | 4 | 3.36 | 84.00 ± 20.97 | 3.64 | 91.00 |
| Commercial orange juice | 6 | 4.98 | 83.00 ± 21.67 | 5.68 | 94.66 |
| Commercial orange juice | 8 | 6.66 | 83.25 ± 21.44 | 7.28 | 91.00 |
CPE = carbon paste electrode; HPLC = high-performance liquid chromatography.
, where R0 is the percentage recovery and t is the distribution value chosen for the desired confidence level. Theoretical values at 95% confidence limits: t = 2.45.
4. Conclusion
The silver particles were deposed electrochemically on CPE using cyclic voltammetry. The obtained electrode was used to determine PQ in juice orange samples without any pretreatment or extraction procedure. The results obtained showed the efficiency of the silver-modified carbon electrode for the determination of low concentrations of PQ(II) by SWV. The repeatability, sensitivity, and accuracy rates are good, provided that the proper instrumental parameters are used. The analytical results show that the proposed modified electrode was able to detect 2.01 × 10−8 mol/L of PQ with good sensitivity and repeatability.
Acknowledgments
The research described in this article has been funded by the University Hassan 1, Khouribga, Morocco.
Funding Statement
The research described in this article has been funded by the University Hassan 1, Khouribga, Morocco.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1. Almeida GL, Schmitt GC, Bairros AV, Emanuelli T, Garcia SC. Os riscos e danos nas intoxicacões por paraquat em animais domésticos. Ciência Rural. 2007;37:1506–12. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dinis-Oliveira RJ, Remiao F, Carmo H, Duarte JA, Navarro AS, Bastos ML, Carvalho F. Paraquat exposure as an etiological factor of Parkinson’s disease. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27:1110–22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Langston JW, Forno LS, Tetrud J, Reeves AG, Kaplan JA, Karluk D. Evidence of active nerve cell degeneration in the substantia nigra of humans years after 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropryidine exposure. Ann Neurol. 1999;46:598–605. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(199910)46:4<598::aid-ana7>3.0.co;2-f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Burns RS, Chiueh CC, Markey SP, Ebert MH, Jacobowitz DM, Kopin IJ. A primate model of parkinsonism: selective destruction of dopaminergic neurons in the pars compacta of the substantia nigra by N-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:4546–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.14.4546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Costello S, Cockburn M, Bronstein J, Zhang X, Ritz B. Parkinson’s disease and residential exposure to maneb and paraquat from agricultural applications in the central valley of California. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;169:919–26. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mohammadi-Bardboria A, Ghazi-Khansarib M. Alternative electron acceptors: proposed mechanism of paraquat mitochondrial toxicity. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008;26:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2008.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Commission Regulation (EC) no 149/2008 of 29 January 2008 amending Regulation (EC) no 396/2005, 2008
- 8. Commission Regulation (EU) no 520/2009 of 6 May 2011. 2011 [Google Scholar]
- 9. Infante CMC, Morales-Rubio A, Guardia MDI, Rocha FRP. A multicommuted flow system with solenoid micro-pumps for paraquat determination in natural waters. Talanta. 2008;75:1376–81. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.01.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Melo LC, Salazar-Banda GR, Machado SAS, De Lima-Neto P, De Souza D, Correia AN. A simple and sensitive detection of diquat herbicide using a dental amalgam electrode A comparison using the chromatographic technique. Talanta. 2009;79:1216–22. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Figueiredo-Filho LCS, Dos Santos VB, Janegitz BC, Guerreiro TB, Fatibello-Filho O, Faria RC, Marcolino-Junior LH. Differential pulse voltammetric determination of paraquat using a bismuth-film electrode. Electroanalysis. 2010;22:1260–6. [Google Scholar]
- 12. De Souza D, Codognoto L, Machado SAS, Avaca LA. Electroanalytical determination of the herbicide paraquat in natural water and commercial tea samples with gold electrodes obtained from recordable compact disc. Anal Lett. 2005;38:331–41. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Xiao L, Wildgoose GG, Compton RG. Investigating the voltammetric reduction of methylviologen at gold and carbon based electrode materials. Evidence for a surface bound adsorption mechanism leading to electrode ‘protection’ using multi-walled carbon nanotubes. New J Chem. 2008;32:1628–33. [Google Scholar]
- 14. El Mhammedi MA, Bakasse M, Bachirat R, Chtaini A. Square wave voltammetry for analytical determination of paraquat at carbon paste electrode modified with fluoroapatite. Food Chem. 2008;110:1001–6. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mai N, Liu X, Wei W, Luo S, Liu W. Electrochemical determination of paraquat using a DNA-modified carbon ionic liquid electrode. Microchim Acta. 2011;174:89–95. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ribeiro JA, Carreira CA, Lee HJ, Silva F, Martins A, Pereira CM. Voltammetric determination of paraquat at DNA-gold nanoparticle composite electrodes. Electrochim Acta. 2010;55:7892–6. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lopes IC, De Souza D, Machado SAS, Tanaka AA. Voltammetric detection of paraquat pesticide on a phthalocyanine-based pyrolitic graphite electrode. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;388:1907–14. doi: 10.1007/s00216-007-1397-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. De Oliveira UMF, Lichtig J, Masini JC. Evaluation of a Nafion coated glassy carbon electrode for determination of paraquat by differential pulse voltammetry. J Braz Chem Soc. 2004;15:735–41. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Ruhling I, Schafer H, Ternes W. HPLC online reductive scanning voltammetric detection of diquat, paraquat and difenzoquat with mercury electrodes. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 1999;364:565–9. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Metters JP, Kadara RO, Banks CE. New directions in screen printed electroanalytical sensors: an overview of recent developments. Analyst. 2011;136:1067–76. doi: 10.1039/c0an00894j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Laschi S, Bulukin E, Palchetti I, Cristea C, Mascini M. Disposable electrodes modified with multi-wall carbon nanotubes for biosensor applications. ITBM-RBM. 2008;29:202–7. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Antiochia R, Gorton L. A new osmium-polymer modified screen-printed grapheme electrode for fructose detection. Sensor Actuators B Chem. 2014;195:287–93. [Google Scholar]
- 23. De Lacey AL, Bes MT, Gómez-Moreno C, Fernández VM. Amperometric enzyme electrode for NADP+ based on a ferrodoxin-NADP+ reductase and viologen-modified glassy carbon electrode. J Electroanal Chem. 1995;390:69–76. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ramdane-Terbouche CA, Terbouche A, Djebbar S, Hauchard D. Electrochemical sensors using modified electrodes based on copper complexes formed with Algerian humic acid modified with ethylenediamine or triethylenetetramine for determination of nitrite in water. Talanta. 2014;119:214–25. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.10.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Starowicz M, Stypuła B, Banás J. Electrochemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Electrochem Commun. 2006;8:227–30. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Welch CM, Compton RG. The use of nanoparticles in electroanalysis: a review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006;384:601–19. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-0230-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Sun L, Zhang Z, Mater HD. A novel method for preparation of silver nanoparticles. Mater Lett. 2003;57:3874–9. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Fukushima M, Yanagi H, Hayashi S, Suganuma N, Taniguchi Y. Fabrication of gold nanoparticles and their influence on optical properties of dye-doped sol–gel films. Thin Solid Films. 2003;438–439:39–43. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Dai X, Nekrassova O, Hyde ME, Compton RG. Anodic stripping voltammetry of arsenic(III) using gold nanoparticle-modified electrodes. Anal Chem. 2004;76:5924–59. doi: 10.1021/ac049232x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. El-Deab MS, Okajima T, Ohsaka T. Electrochemical reduction of oxygen on gold nanoparticle-electrodeposited glassy carbon electrodes. J Electrochem Soc. 2003;150:A851–7. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Welch CM, Banks CE, Simm AO, Compton RG. Silver nanoparticle assemblies supported on glassy-carbon electrodes for the electroanalytical detection of hydrogen peroxide. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;382:12–21. doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-3205-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Yin B, Ma H, Wang S, Chen S. Electrochemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles under protection of poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) J Phys Chem B. 2003;107:8898–904. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Farahi A, Achak M, El Gaini L, El Mhammedi MA, Bakasse M.Silver particles-modified carbon paste electrodes for differential pulse voltammetric determination of paraquat in ambient water samples. [DOI]
- 34. Encarnación BCM, Olga DR, Julia AMM. Determination of lamotrigine by adsorptive stripping voltammetry using silver nanoparticle-modified carbon screen-printed electrodes. Talanta. 2007;74:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rameshbabu N, Sampath Kumar TS, Prabhakar TG, Sastry VS, Murty KVGK, Prasad Rao1 K. Antibacterial nanosized silver substituted hydroxyapatite: Synthesis and characterization. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;80:581–91. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Basile A, Bhatt AI, O’Mullane AP, Bhargava SK. An investigation of silver electrodeposition from ionic liquids: Influence of atmospheric water uptake on the silver electrodeposition mechanism and film morphology. Electrochim Acta. 2011;56:2895–905. [Google Scholar]
- 37. El Harmoudi H, Achak M, Farahi A, Lahrich S, El Gaini L, Abdennouri M, Bouzidi A, Bakasse M, El Mhammedi MA. Sensitive determination of paraquat by square wave anodic stripping voltammetry with chitin modified carbon paste electrode. Talanta. 2013;115:172–7. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Almeida RMD, Yonamine M. Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric method for the determination of the herbicides paraquat and diquat in plasma and urine samples. J Chromatogr A. 2007;853:260–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Brunetto MR, Morales AR, Gallignani M, Burguera JL, Burguera M. Determination of paraquat in human blood plasma using reversed-phase ion-pair high performance liquid chromatography with direct sample injection. Talanta. 2003;59:913–21. doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00645-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Livia LCG, Luiz CSF, Geiser GO, Orlando F, Craig EB. Square-wave voltammetric determination of paraquat using a glassy carbon electrode modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes within adihexadecyl hydrogen phosphate (DHP) film. Sens Actuators B. 2013;181:306–11. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hodgeson JW, Bashe WJ, Eichelberger JW. Method 549.1, Revision 1.0 Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Office of research and development. U.S. EPA; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 42.EPA. http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/reregistration/REDs/factsheets/0262fact.pdf .
- 43.Health Canadian Agency. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/alt_formats/hecs-sesc/pdf/pubs/water-eau/paraquat/paraquat-eng.pdf .




