Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Jul 22;7(30):25999–26004. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c07373

Concurrent Enhancement of Breakdown Strength and Dielectric Constant in Poly(vinylidene Fluoride) Film with High Energy Storage Density by Ultraviolet Irradiation

Hexing Liu †, Bao-Wen Li †,‡,*, Jiayu Chen †, Zhonghui Shen ‡, Xin Zhang ‡, Jing Wang §,*, Ce-Wen Nan ∥
PMCID: PMC9352248  PMID: 35936448

Abstract

graphic file with name ao1c07373_0008.jpg

Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) film with high energy storage density has exhibited great potential for applications in modern electronics, particle accelerators, and pulsed lasers. Typically, dielectric/ferroelectric properties of PVDF film have been tailored for energy storage through stretching, annealing, and defect modification. Here, PVDF films were prepared by the solution casting method followed by an ultraviolet (UV) irradiation process, with special emphasis on how such treatment influences their dielectric and energy storage properties. Upon UV irradiation, the dielectric constant and breakdown strength of the PVDF film were enhanced simultaneously. A high energy density of 18.6 J/cm3, along with a charge–discharge efficiency of 81% at 600 MV/m, was achieved in PVDF after exposure to UV for 15 min. This work may provide a simple and yet effective route to enhance energy storage density of PVDF-based polymers.

1. Introduction

Dielectric polymer capacitors possessing high power density capacity and fast discharge capability have recently gained great attention in modern electronics and electrical power systems.1−3 However, compared with the supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries, low energy density is one of the major challenges on the increasing demands of micro-electronics and electric power systems. For example, the energy density of most widely used polypropylene (BOPP) is limited to 1–2 J/cm3.3,4 Dielectric polymer materials can store and release energy with reversibility of polarization after removing the electric field. In general, the energy storage density (Ue) of dielectric materials can be expressed as follows:

1. 1

where E denotes the electric field and D represents the electrical displacement. Specifically, for linear dielectrics, eq 1 could be described as

1. 2

where ε0 and εr represent vacuum dielectric permittivity and relative dielectric permittivity, respectively. Eb is the breakdown strength of the dielectric material.5,6 Apparently, the energy density strongly depends on Eb, which makes polymer-based dielectrics an ideal choice owing to their much higher Eb than their ceramic counterparts.7 Among multitudinous dielectric materials, PVDF displays obvious advantages including easy processing, good flexibility, and high dielectric constants.8 Compared to the linear polymer, non-linear ones with polar groups in the molecular chain usually exhibit higher εr. Moreover, the fluorine atoms in the PVDF molecular chain have larger electronegativity and smaller size, leading to larger dipole moment. However, PVDF possesses relatively low energy storage density and high energy loss due to the high remnant polarization.4

The structural optimization has proved to be an effective method to improve the dielectric and ferroelectric properties of polymers. Several studies on the crystal modification of PVDF, such as stretching, annealing, cross-linking, and defect modification, have been reported.9−12 For instance, by introducing other monomers into PVDF polymer chains, higher polarization and strong dipole field interactions could be achieved, and the ferroelectric hysteresis loss is reduced.13 Several monomers such as chlorofluoroethylene (CFE), trifluoroethylene (TrFE), chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE), and hexafluoroethylene (HFP) have been introduced to the VDF chains in PVDF. For example, the addition of an HFP monomer can greatly improve the mechanical properties of the polymer; a large Eb of >700 MV/m can be obtained in P(VDF-HFP), yielding the highest energy density over 25 J/cm3. However, modifying PVDF still exhibit moderate discharged efficiency (η) below 70%.14 It has been widely reported that the ferroelectric loss of PVDF-based polymers is closely related to its matrix phase structure. In details, compared with the non-polar α phase of the zigzag configuration, PVDF shows greater dielectric loss in the polar β-phase of the all-trans configuration.15 Interestingly, high-energy radiation can effectively reduce the ferroelectric domain size of PVDF-based polymers and facilitate the transformation of PVDF into a relaxor ferroelectric, where the dipoles evert and respond rapidly to the external electrical field with greatly reduced dielectric loss. Moreover, high-energy radiation can improve the crystallinity in polymer materials and lead to the formation of a cross-linked network, thereby improving the dielectric/ferroelectric properties of PVDF. Very recently, Chen et al. reported that the Eb of the PP film was greatly enhanced by UV irradiation, which resulted in chain scission and cross-linking.16 Such an observation inspired us to explore the influence of ultraviolet radiation on the energy storage performance of the PVDF system.

In this work, we reported the simultaneously enhanced breakdown strength and dielectric constant in PVDF after exposure to UV irradiation. The UV irradiation can increase the εr up to 15 and Eb to 637 MV/m, resulting in great enhancements of 43 and 26% as compared with the untreated PVDF, respectively. The UV-irradiated PVDF films still maintained a high energy efficiency η of 81% and stable performance over a charge–discharge cycling of 106 cycles even under high electric fields. Our results shed light on enhancing the energy storage capacity of PVDF-based dielectrics via UV irradiation for application in electrical power systems and microelectronics.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of PVDF Film

PVDF (99.99%, Arkema) powders were first dispersed into 4 mL N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (99.5%, Sigma). After stirring for 2 h, a homogeneous solution was obtained. Subsequently, the solution was casted on a clean glass plate. After drying under vacuum at 60 °C for 12 h, the PVDF films were immediately quenched in ice water by heating at 200 °C for another 10 min followed by drying at 40 °C for 12 h. Finally, the obtained PVDF films with a thickness of 10–12 μm were peeled off from the glass plate.

2.2. UV Irradiation Treatment

For the UV irradiation, each side of PVDF films was irradiated at room temperature for 5–20 min, with an irradiance intensity of 20 mW/cm2. The irradiation source was located at 5 cm from the PVDF films. To investigate the effect of UV irradiation on dielectric performance, each side of the pristine PVDF films was exposed to UV irradiation for 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, and the resultant samples were termed as PVDF-UV-5 min, PVDF-UV-10 min, PVDF-UV-15 min, and PVDF-UV-20 min, respectively.

2.3. Material Characterization

UV irradiation experiments were performed via the UV lamp system (200 W, λmax = 185 and 254 nm, BOT-UV200WT). Crystal information of PVDF film was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Rigaku SmartLab) using Cu Kα radiation. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Asylum research Cipher ES) was employed to examine the morphology of the PVDF films. Structural information of the PVDF films was carried out using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Nicolet Nexus). Melting behavior analysis of the PVDF films was performed by heating to 220 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 8500, PerkinElmer). For the swelling characterization, the rate of insolubility of the prepared samples was calculated from the weight decrease in 20 mL of DMF solution for 2 h. The surface composition was carried out by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (ESCALAB 250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific). For the electrical measurement, copper electrodes (3 mm in diameter and 50 nm in thickness) were deposited on both sides of the PVDF films. Dielectric properties of PVDF films were measured via an LCR meter (Agilent 4294A) at room temperature in a frequency range of 103 to 106 Hz at 1 voltage of root mean square. Electric displacement–electric field (D–E) loops were measured at 10 Hz using a ferroelectric testing system (CPE1701, PolyK Technologies). Electric breakdown strength was evaluated via the dielectric withstand voltage test (Beijing Electro-mechanical Research Institute Supervoltage Technique) at a ramping rate of 200 V/s and a limit current of 2 mA. The DC leakage current densities (in A/cm2) were collected with the ferroelectric test system. Charge and discharge experiments were carried out via a capacitor charge–discharge test system (PKCPR1701, PolyK Technologies) with a high-voltage MOSFET switch, where the samples were charged by an electric field of 200 MV/m through the MOSFET switch and the stored energy was discharged to a load resistor of 100 kΩ.

3. Results and Discussion

As shown in Figure 1a, the fluorine and hydrogen atoms in the branched chains were connected to the carbon atoms in the ball-and-stick model of PVDF. XRD patterns of pristine PVDF and PVDF irradiated for different times are presented in Figure 1b. The diffraction peaks appearing at 18.4 and 19.9° could be assigned to (020) and (110) crystal planes of the α-phase of PVDF, which suggested that UV irradiation may have negligible effect on the crystal structure of the PVDF films.17 Meanwhile, FTIR analysis was carried out to examine the surface chemistry of the film. The absorption bond corresponding to the vibration of the CF=O group was observed at 1720 cm–1 in all PVDF-UV films. The exposure of PVDF films to UV irradiation ruptured the covalent bonds to form the free radicals, which were associated with the formation of a CF=O group (Figure 1c).18 In addition, DSC curves provided additional information to determine the chemical structure of the PVDF film (Figure 1d). Compared to the pristine PVDF, the melting point of irradiated PVDF gradually decreased with the increasing UV irradiation time, leading to the enhanced molecular chain mobility after UV irradiation. In contrast, the crystallinity of the PVDF films gradually increased from 50 to approximately 65.5% when the UV irradiation time was extended up to 20 min (Table 1). In this context, the extension of UV irradiation accelerated the breakage of molecular chain, thereby increasing the degree of crystallinity in the PVDF films.19−21

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic illustration of the PVDF film under UV irradiation and the ball-and-stick model of PVDF. (b) XRD patterns, (c) FTIR, and (d) DSC curves of the pristine PVDF and PVDF irradiated by UV for different times.

Table 1. Melting Point (Tm), Enthalpy (ΔHf), and Crystallinity (Xc) of Pristine PVDF and PVDF Irradiated by UV for Different Times.

sample Tm (°C) ΔHf (J/g) Xc (%)
untreated PVDF 165.7 52.6 50
PVDF-UV 5 min 163.5 59.4 56.7
PVDF-UV 10 min 163.6 58.2 55.6
PVDF-UV 15 min 163 61.4 58.6
PVDF-UV 20 min 162 68.6 65.5
Open in a new tab

AFM images of the pristine PVDF and PVDF film irradiated for different times are shown in Figure 2. The surface of pristine PVDF was smooth, with a root mean square (RMS) roughness of 3.4 nm. After UV irradiation for 5 min, however, the surface became much rougher and the RMS roughness was increased to about 10.5 nm, which could be attributed to the uneven molecular weight caused by free radical polymerization. With further exposure to UV irradiation, the RMS roughness reached 16.6 nm in PVDF-UV-10 min, as depicted in Figure 2c. The maximum RMS roughness of 21.9 nm was achieved in the PVDF-UV-20 min (Figure 2d), suggesting the excessive degradation of the PVDF film.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

AFM images (10 × 10 μm2) of (a) pristine PVDF and PVDF irradiated by UV for (b) 5, (c) 10, and (d) 20 min.

Chemical compositions of the PVDF films were further analyzed by XPS (Supporting Information, Figure S1). A new signal indicative of the O element confirmed the existence of chain scission in the PVDF-UV-15 min. The C 1s spectrum for the irradiated PVDF (Figure S1b) was fitted with four peaks, which correspond to different types of carbon bonds, that is, a C–C peak at 284.5 eV, a C–H peak at 286.4 eV, a C–OH peak at 289.3 eV, and a C–F peak at 291 eV.22 As compared to pristine PVDF film, the appearance of C=O (532 eV), C–OH (533 eV), and O–CF (535.7 eV) bonds in the O 1s spectrum confirmed the chain scission occurring in the PVDF-UV-15 min. This result suggests the formation of oxygen-containing groups in the near-surface layer of PVDF film after UV irradiation, primarily owing to interaction of polymer molecules with O2 in air (Figure S1c).

Frequency-dependent dielectric performance is depicted in Figure 3. Due to the interfacial polarization relaxation of PVDF film, the εr monotonically decreased with the increase of frequency (Figure 3a).23,24 Notably, the εr kept rising with extended exposure to UV irradiation in all samples. For example, the εr values of pristine PVDF and PVDF-UV films at 100 Hz were 10.5 and in the range of 12.3–15.0, respectively. The enhancement was about 17%, and about 26.6–43% with the monotonous increase in UV irradiation time. Such enhancement in the εr after UV irradiation can be attributed to the detachment of side groups and the formation of C–O bonds, which prompt ionic polarization and dipole mobility in PVDF. Meanwhile, the dielectric loss slightly increased with the extension of UV exposure time, which may be related to the high conductivity and relaxation loss induced by the polar groups. Moreover, a slight decrease in εr was observed with further increase in the irradiation time up to 20 min. This can be mainly attributed to the defects induced by the excessive exposure to UV radiation, resulting in a decrease in the dipole mobility (Figure 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Frequency dependence of the dielectric constant and dielectric loss for the pristine PVDF and PVDF irradiated by UV for different times. (b) Dielectric constant and dielectric loss plotted as a function of UV irradiation time for PVDF at 100 Hz.

Figure 4 displays the leakage current density of PVDF films. In general, the leakage current densities were maintained within the range of 10–10 to 10–5 A cm–2 under the electric field of 200 MV m–1. For pristine PVDF films, the leakage current density was 5.49 × 10–7 A cm–2 at 200 MV m–1. The increased crystallinity may be responsible for reduced leakage current density to 4.5 × 10–7 A cm–2 with UV irradiation up to 5 min, above which substantially increased leakage current density could be observed. For example, the leakage current densities of PVDF-UV-10 min and PVDF-UV-15 min films were 8.54 × 10–7 and 9.83 × 10–7 A cm–2 at 200 MV m–1, respectively. The slightly enhanced leakage density could be associated with the formation of a large number of charged radicals generated by breaking of chemical bonds.25 With irradiation time up to 20 min, a further increased leakage current density of 1.48 × 10–6 A cm–2 was observed.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Leakage current density of the pristine PVDF and PVDF irradiated by UV for different times.

As expected, an enhanced Eb was critical to the improvement of energy storage density in dielectric materials. The Eb was calculated from Weibull statistics and is shown in Figure 5a.

3. 3

where P(E), Eb, and β are the cumulative probability of the electric failure, the characteristic breakdown strength corresponding to 63.2% probability of failure, and shape parameter, respectively.26−29 Obviously, UV irradiation was effective to improve the Eb of the PVDF films. For example, the Eb was increased from 507 MV/m in the pristine PVDF film to 529 MV/m in the PVDF-UV-5 min and then increased to 589 MV/m in the PVDF-UV-15 min. Specially, cross-linking and the increase of crystallinity during UV irradiation played an important role in improving the Eb of the PVDF films. The solubility of PVDF in DMF was carried out to evaluate the effect of UV irradiation on its chains. As shown in Figure S2, the pristine PVDF was fully soluble in DMF. However, the insoluble fraction of PVDF in DMF gradually increased with UV irradiation time. For example, the insoluble fraction was increased to 44 wt % with UV irradiation for 15 min, which could be attributed to cross-linking in PVDF. After extended UV irradiation up to 20 min, the insoluble fraction was decreased to 33 wt %. This result suggests that PVDF films underwent both chain scission and degradation instead of cross-linking. Therefore, the maximum Eb of ∼637 MV/m was obtained in the PVDF-UV-15 min, much higher than that of 507 MV/m for the pristine PVDF film. However, a further increase of UV irradiation time to 20 min caused a decrease in the Eb, which could be ascribed to excessive cross-linking and degradation in the PVDF films (Figure 5b).11

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Weibull statistic of breakdown strength for the pristine PVDF and irradiated PVDF. (b) Plot of Weibull breakdown strength of the PVDF with UV irradiation time. (c) Unipolar D–E loops obtained at 10 Hz. Plots of (d) discharged energy density and (e) energy storage efficiency with electric field. (f) Plots of discharged energy density and charge–discharge efficiency with UV irradiation time.

Unipolar D–E loops of PVDF irradiated under different times are shown in Figure 5c. With increasing UV irradiation time, the enhancement of maximum polarization was observed, which could be ascribed to the improved Eb. In addition, Pmax of the PVDF-UV-15 min was about 8.1 μC/cm2, showing an increment of 37% as compared with 5.9 μC/cm2 observed in the untreated PVDF. Meanwhile, the PVDF films after UV irradiation still maintained a relatively lower remnant polarization. The discharged energy density and charge–discharge efficiency are displayed in Figure 5d,e. The untreated PVDF presented the lowest discharge energy density of 11.4 J/cm3 with a η of 81%. As shown in Figure 5f, benefitting from the enhanced Eb and εr, PVDF-UV films exhibited greatly improved energy storage performance. In detail, the maximum discharged energy density of 18.6 J/cm3 was achieved in PVDF-UV-15 min. However, further elongation of UV irradiation time would result in reduced Ue as a consequence of the decreased Eb in the PVDF-UV-20 min. More importantly, the PVDF-UV-15 min maintained a high η of 81% even at 600 MV/m, probably owing to the improved crystallinity of the PVDF and reduction in the defect concentrations after UV irradiation.

To further demonstrate the stability of the PVDF-UV film as the dielectric energy storage medium, the cyclic fast-discharge experiment of the pristine PVDF and the PVDF-UV-15 min film was performed at 400 MV/m. As in Figure 6a, both energy density and η exhibited stable performance without obvious degradation over a charge–discharge cycling up to 106 cycles, showing a high stability of the PVDF-UV-15 min film. Furthermore, a fast discharge time was required in high power capacitors. A fast discharge test was implemented. The discharged energy density (Ue) of a dielectric capacitor could be calculated using the following expression:

3. 4

where R and V represent the load resistance (100 kΩ) and the sample volume, respectively. The discharged time was determined as the time required to release 90% of the final stored energy.30 As depicted in Figure 6b, the PVDF-UV-15 min film liberated an energy density of 0.89 J/cm3 at 200 MV/m, while the discharged time was only 13.9 μs, which exhibited a faster discharge rate compared with 14.8 μs of the pristine PVDF. Accordingly, the PVDF-UV-15 min film exhibited a superior power density of 0.068 MW/cm3, which was 1.5 times higher than 0.045 MW/cm3 of the pristine PVDF. These results showed good potential of these UV-irradiated PVDF films for applications in high energy density capacitors.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) Cyclic ability of discharged energy density and energy efficiency for the pristine PVDF and PVDF irradiated for 15 min. Plots of (b) discharged energy density and (c) power density with time.

4. Conclusions

In summary, proper UV irradiation can significantly enhance the energy storage capacity of the PVDF film. Upon UV irradiation, scission and cross-linking occurred in PVDF, and therefore, contribute to simultaneous enhancement in the dielectric constant and breakdown strength. Compared with untreated PVDF film, the UV-irradiated PVDF films exhibited a remarkably high discharged energy density of 18.6 J/cm3 and a moderate charge–discharge efficiency of 81%. Stable performance can also maintain over a charge–discharge cycling up to 106 cycles even under high electric field. This work may offer a simple route to improve energy storage performance of various ferroelectric polymers through UV irradiation, which held promise for mass production.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Basic Science Center Program of NSFC (grant no. 51788104), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51872214), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WUT: 2021III019JC, 2018III041GX).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.1c07373.

  • XPS spectra of PVDF films and solubility of PVDF films in DMF with UV irradiations for different times (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao1c07373_si_001.pdf (200.1KB, pdf)

References

  1. Gade H.; Bokka S.; Chase G. G. Polarization treatments of electrospun PVDF fiber mats. Polymer 2021, 212, 123152 10.1016/j.polymer.2020.123152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jin L.; Ma S. Y.; Deng W. L.; Yan C.; Yang T.; Chu X.; Tian G.; Xiong D.; Lu J.; Yang W. Q. Polarization-free high-crystallization β-PVDF piezoelectric nanogenerator toward self-powered 3D acceleration sensor. Nano Energy 2018, 50, 632–638. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kaur S.; Kumar A.; Sharma A. L.; Singh D. P. Influence of annealing on dielectric and polarization behavior of PVDF thick films. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 2017, 28, 8391–8396. 10.1007/s10854-017-6556-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang X.; Li B. W.; Dong L. J.; Liu H. X.; Chen W.; Shen Y.; Nan C. W. Superior Energy Storage Performances of Polymer Nanocomposites via Modification of Filler/Polymer Interfaces. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1800096. 10.1002/admi.201800096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Qiao Y. L.; Islam M. S.; Han K.; Leonhardt E.; Zhang J. Y.; Wang Q.; Ploehn H. J.; Tang C. B. Polymers Containing Highly Polarizable Conjugated Side Chains as High-Performance All-Organic Nanodielectric Materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 5638–5646. 10.1002/adfm.201300736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wei W. T.; Huang C.; Zhang L. Y.; Wang Y.; Xu M. Y.; Deng Y. Design on polarization distribution in all-organic polymer hybrids for high density energy storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 125052 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thakur Y.; Lin M. R.; Wu S.; Cheng Z. X.; Jeong D. Y.; Zhang Q. M. Tailoring the dipole properties in dielectric polymers to realize high energy density with high breakdown strength and low dielectric loss. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 114104. 10.1063/1.4915942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh R.; Janakiraman S.; Khalifa M.; Anandhan S.; Ghosh S.; Venimadhav A.; Biswas K. An electroactive β-phase polyvinylidene fluoride as gel polymer electrolyte for magnesium–ion battery application. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 851, 113417 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.113417. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lu H. W.; Du J. X.; Yu C. P.; Wang X. P.; Gao Y. L.; Xu W. Z.; Liu A. P.; Lu X. X.; Chen Y. X. Ultrahigh Energy Storage Capacitance and High Breakdown Strength in Biaxially Oriented Poly(vinylidene fluoride) Using a High-Electric-Induced Technique. Macromol. Res. 2020, 28, 573–579. 10.1007/s13233-020-8073-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meng N.; Ren X. T.; Santagiuliana G.; Ventura L.; Zhang H.; Wu J. Y.; Yan H. X.; Reece M. J.; Bilotti E. Ultrahigh β-phase content poly(vinylidene fluoride) with relaxor-like ferroelectricity for high energy density capacitors. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4535. 10.1038/s41467-019-12391-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shin E.; Yoo J.; Yoo G.; Kim Y. J.; Kim Y. S. Eco-friendly cross-linked polymeric dielectric material based on natural tannic acid. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 358, 170–175. 10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.176. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Misra M.; Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A.; Chung T. C.; Ramprasad R.; Kumar S. K. Critical role of morphology on the dielectric constant of semicrystalline polyolefins. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 234905. 10.1063/1.4953182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ren X. T.; Meng N.; Zhang H.; Wu J. Y.; Abrahams I.; Yan H. X.; Bilotti E.; Reece M. J. Giant energy storage density in PVDF with internal stress engineered polar nanostructures. Nano Energy 2020, 72, 104662 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104662. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou X.; Zhao X. H.; Suo Z. G.; Zou C.; Runt J.; Liu S.; Zhang S. H.; Zhang Q. M. Electrical breakdown and ultrahigh electrical energy density in poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene) copolymer. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 162901. 10.1063/1.3123001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang Y. F.; Rui G. C.; Li Q.; Allahyarov E.; Li R. P.; Fukuto M.; Zhong G. J.; Xu J. Z.; Li Z. M.; Taylor P. L.; Zhu L. Enhanced piezoelectricity from highly polarizable oriented amorphous fractions in biaxially oriented poly(vinylidene fluoride) with pure β crystals. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 675. 10.1038/s41467-020-20662-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen J. Y.; Li B. W.; Sun Y.; Zhang P. X.; Shen Z. H.; Zhang X.; Nan C. W.; Zhang S. J. Greatly enhanced breakdown strength and energy density in ultraviolet-irradiated polypropylene. IET Nanodielectr. 2021, 4, 223–228. 10.1049/nde2.12022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. He L. H.; Sun J.; Wang X. X.; Wang C. D.; Song R.; Hao Y. M. Facile and effective promotion of β crystalline phase in poly(vinylidene fluoride) via the incorporation of imidazolium ionic liquids. Polym. Int. 2013, 62, 638–646. 10.1002/pi.4339. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tan Z. Y.; Fu C.; Gao Y. X.; Qian J.; Li W. Y.; Wu X. Y.; Chu H. Y.; Chen C. H.; Nie W.; Ran X. H. Modifications of Gamma poly (vinylidene fluoride) (γ-PVDF) films by high-energy electron beam irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 153, 258–268. 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.06.051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Berthelot T.; Le X. T.; Jégou P.; Viel P.; Boizot B.; Baudin C.; Palacin S. Photoactivated surface grafting from PVDF surfaces. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 9473–9479. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Botelho G.; Silva M. M.; Gonçalves A. M.; Sencadas V.; Serrado-Nunes J.; Lanceros-Mendez S. Performance of electroactive poly(vinylidene fluoride) against UV radiation. Polym. Test. 2008, 27, 818–822. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2008.06.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gonçalves A. M.; Serrado-Nunes J.; Sencadas V.; Botelho G.; Belsley M.; Lanceros-Méndez S. Photodegradation Studies of Poly(Vinylidene Fluoride). Mater. Sci. Forum 2008, 587-588, 543–547. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.587-588.543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lech A.; Butruk-Raszeja B. A.; Ciach T.; Lawniczak-Jablonska K.; Kuzmiuk P.; Bartnik A.; Wachulak P.; Fiedorowicz H. Surface Modification of PLLA, PTFE and PVDF with Extreme Ultraviolet (EUV) to Enhance Cell Adhesion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 9679. 10.3390/ijms21249679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Han K.; Li Q.; Chanthad C.; Gadinski M. R.; Zhang G. Z.; Wang Q. A Hybrid Material Approach Toward Solution-Processable Dielectrics Exhibiting Enhanced Breakdown Strength and High Energy Density. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 3505–3513. 10.1002/adfm.201501070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Peng G. R.; Zhao X. J.; Zhan Z. J.; Ci S. Z.; Wang Q.; Liang Y. J.; Zhao M. L. New crystal structure and discharge efficiency of poly(vinylidene fluoride-hexafluoropropylene)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend films. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 16849–16854. 10.1039/C3RA47462C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang S. H.; Park J. W. Effect of Post-Plasma Treatment Time on the Properties of Low Dielectric Fluorinated Amorphous Carbon Films. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2001, 40, 694–697. 10.1143/JJAP.40.694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Han R. X.; Jin J. Z.; Khanchaitit P.; Wang J. K.; Wang Q. Effect of crystal structure on polarization reversal and energy storage of ferroelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-chlorotrifluoroethylene) thin films. Polymer 2012, 53, 1277–1281. 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.02.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Khanchaitit P.; Han K.; Gadinski M. R.; Li Q.; Wang Q. Ferroelectric polymer networks with high energy density and improved discharged efficiency for dielectric energy storage. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2845. 10.1038/ncomms3845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Haggag S.; Nasrat L.; Ismail H. ANN approaches to determine the dielectric strength improvement of MgO based low density polyethylene nanocomposite. J. Adv. Dielectr. 2021, 11, 2150016. 10.1142/S2010135X21500168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun L.; Shi Z. C.; He B. L.; Wang H. L.; Liu S.; Huang M. H.; Shi J.; Dastan D.; Wang H. Asymmetric Trilayer All-Polymer Dielectric Composites with Simultaneous High Efficiency and High Energy Density: A Novel Design Targeting Advanced Energy Storage Capacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2100280. 10.1002/adfm.202100280. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pan J. L.; Li K.; Chuayprakong S.; Hsu T.; Wang Q. High-temperature poly(phthalazinone ether ketone) thin films for dielectric energy storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 1286–1289. 10.1021/am100146u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao1c07373_si_001.pdf (200.1KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES