Abstract
As free-living crows are a potential source of Campylobacter infections in broilers and cattle, we characterized Campylobacter spp. isolated from crows using multilocus sequence typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. We obtained 82 samples from 27 birds captured at seven different times using a trap set in Tochigi prefecture, Japan. Campylobacter jejuni was isolated from 55 (67.1%) of the 82 samples and classified into 29 sequence types, of which 21 were novel. Tetracycline and streptomycin resistance rates were 18.2% and 3.6%, respectively. These results show that most types of C. jejuni infecting crows differ from those isolated from humans, broilers, and cattle. Thus, the importance of free-living crows as reservoirs of Campylobacter infections in broilers and cattle may be limited.
Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, Campylobacter, crow, sequence type
Campylobacter spp. is the most common cause of human gastroenteritis worldwide [28]. Kumagai et al. [12] investigated foodborne outbreaks in Japan caused by Campylobacter spp. during 2007–2018 and concluded that primary sources of the disease were chicken (80.3%) and beef products (10.5%). The Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries has designated Campylobacter spp. as a prioritized hazard in food safety risk management, identified chicken and beef as the principal sources of Campylobacter infection in humans, and monitors the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in broiler and beef farms [9, 10, 21, 22]. A national survey conducted in 2009 found that the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in Japanese broiler flocks was 47.2% (67/142) [9]. Drinking water, feed, transport crates, cattle, and wildlife have been identified as potential reservoirs of Campylobacter infection in broilers [1, 7, 9, 21]. A subsequent national survey conducted in 2010 found that the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in Japanese beef farms was 88.0% (22/25) [10]. Free-living crows have easy access to livestock farms; therefore, they could be a potential source of Campylobacter infections in the livestock. The crows breed in urban and agricultural settings where they fly around and forage different locations, including livestock farms. Weis et al. [27] detected Campylobacter spp. in 66.9% (85/127) of free-ranging American crows (Corvus brachyrhyncos). In Japan, Maeda et al. [14] reported that C. jejuni was the most dominant bacterium in the intestinal microbiota of a large-billed crow (Corvus macrorhynchos).
Campylobacter infections in humans typically cause acute self-limiting gastroenteritis, and antimicrobial therapy is not provided in most cases. However, when patients are immunocompromised or have other comorbidities, antimicrobial treatment may be necessary [30]. Therefore, antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter spp. are a serious threat to public health. In this study, we aimed to characterize Campylobacter spp. isolated from free-living crows using multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
To capture free-living crows, a mailbox type trap (2.5 × 3.0 × 2.5 m) was built in a private forest in Tochigi prefecture. There was a beef farm within 20 m and several livestock farms including a broiler farm within 3.5 km of the trap. A day before capturing the crows, leftovers from a restaurant were left in the trap. An average of 12 crows were captured every two weeks from May to July 2014. For each crow, a cloacal swab sample was taken using a BBL CultureSwab Plus with Charcoal, Single Swab (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). A numbered looping plastic cable tie was loosely attached to each crow’s tarsus for identification. The permit to trap jungle crows was obtained from the Tochigi prefecture (No. 0010), and approval for the study was obtained from Utsunomiya University (Animal Experiment Permission No. A11-0012). All procedures in this study were performed in accordance with the ethical guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals at Utsunomiya University.
The cloacal swab samples were sent under refrigeration to the National Veterinary Assay Laboratory by express delivery and examined within 48 hr of sampling. Campylobacter spp. was isolated by direct plating on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar, as previously described [21]. A maximum of two suspect isolates per sample were identified by PCR [13]. One Campylobacter species per sample was used for MLST and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. MLST was performed according to the seven-loci schemes for Campylobacter spp., employing the primer sets and experimental conditions suggested by the Campylobacter MLST database (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/). To assess the phylogenetic diversity of C. jejuni isolates from the crows, seven MLST allelic numbers for 43 sequence types (STs) were analyzed using PHYLOViZ Online (https://online.phyloviz.net/index). The minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials were determined using the broth microdilution method with dried plates (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), following guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [5, 6] and reports of the Japanese Veterinary Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring [16]. C. jejuni ATCC33560 was used as a quality control strain. Susceptibility testing of C. jejuni was conducted against ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, nalidixic acid, streptomycin, and tetracycline. For tetracycline-resistant isolates, PCR detection of tet genes was performed as previously described [17]. For streptomycin-resistant isolates, two primers (AadE-F1: AAGGCGGGAAAGCCCTAAAATGGC and AadE-R1: CTCTTTCTGATTTTGAGGTATTCAG) were used to amplify the complete coding sequence of aadE (GenBank accession no. AY701528) [18]. The cycling conditions for PCR using the primer set were 25 amplification cycles at 95°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min, followed by 72°C for 5 min. The nucleotide sequence of the PCR product (998 bp) was determined by direct DNA sequencing.
Sampling was conducted every seven days, and a total of 82 cloacal swab samples were collected. The 82 samples were composed of cloacal swabs from 27 birds. Of these, 21 (77.8%) birds were captured twice or more. All captured birds were large-billed crows. Campylobacter spp. were isolated from 55 (67%) of the 82 samples. All isolates were identified as C. jejuni. One C. jejuni isolate per sample was used for MLST and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The 55 C. jejuni isolates were divided into 29 STs (Table 1). Of the 29 STs, 21 (72.4%) were novel. These 29 STs were phylogenetically different from predominant STs (ST19, ST21, ST22, ST42, ST48, ST50, ST61, ST407, ST918, ST922, ST4253, and ST4626) in human campylobacteriosis [2, 3, 20, 30] (Fig. 1). Although ST45, ST2761, ST8276, and ST6307 belonged to clonal complex (CC) 45, CC952, CC952, and CC1275, respectively, the remaining 25 STs were unassigned. Ten (18.2%) isolates (ST45, one of the four ST2117 isolates, ST2216, ST8277, ST8282, all three ST8289 isolates, and the two ST8290 isolates) were resistant to tetracycline and carried tetO. Of the 10 tetracycline-resistant isolates, two (3.6%) isolates (ST8277 and ST8282) were resistant to streptomycin and carried aadE. No isolates were resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, gentamicin, or nalidixic acid.
Table 1. Sequence types and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Campylobacter jejuni isolates.
Clonal complex | Sequence type | Nunber of isolates | Antimicrobial resistance profile |
---|---|---|---|
CC45 | |||
ST45 | 1 | TC (1) | |
CC952 | |||
ST2761 | 2 | Susceptible (2) | |
ST8276 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
CC1275 | |||
ST6307 | 8 | Susceptible (8) | |
Unassigned | |||
ST951 | 2 | Susceptible (2) | |
ST2117 | 4 | Susceptible (3), TC (1) | |
ST2216 | 1 | TC (1) | |
ST2678 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST4350 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8270 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8271 | 2 | Susceptible (2) | |
ST8272 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8273 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8274 | 2 | Susceptible (2) | |
ST8275 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8277 | 1 | SM+TC (1) | |
ST8278 | 2 | Susceptible (2) | |
ST8279 | 3 | Susceptible (3) | |
ST8280 | 3 | Susceptible (3) | |
ST8281 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8282 | 1 | SM+TC (1) | |
ST8283 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8284 | 2 | Susceptible (2) | |
ST8285 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8286 | 2 | Susceptible (2) | |
ST8287 | 3 | Susceptible (3) | |
ST8288 | 1 | Susceptible (1) | |
ST8289 | 3 | TC (3) | |
ST8290 | 2 | TC (2) |
Novel sequence types are underlined. Parentheses show the number of isolates. TC; tetracycline, SM: streptomycin.
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic tree of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from crows (yellow) and humans (blue). Numbers represent sequence types. CC represents clonal complex.
The prevalence of C. jejuni on each sampling day ranged from 25.0% (8th July) to 100.0% (1st May) (Table 2). Of the 27 birds captured for this study, 24 (88.9%) had C. jejuni in their gastrointestinal contents on at least one sampling day. The remaining three birds (crow codes c16, c17, and c27) were captured only once during this study and did not shed Campylobacter spp. in their gastrointestinal contents. Of the 21 birds captured twice or more, only four (19.0%) (crow codes c3, c9, c20, and c25) had C. jejuni on every sampling day. Moreover, except for a single bird (crow code c1), none of the C. jejuni isolates classified into the same ST were obtained from the same birds on subsequent captures. Interestingly, although the two isolates obtained from crow c1 on 1st and 13th May were classified into the same ST (ST8290), Campylobacter spp. was not isolated on 26th May, and the C. jejuni isolate obtained on 10th June was classified into another ST (ST6307).
Table 2. Isolation and sequence types of Campylobacter jejuni in captured crows.
Crow code | Sampling date |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1-May | 13-May | 26-May | 10-Jun | 24-Jun | 8-Jul | 22-Jul | |
c1 | ST8290a | ST8290 | NIb | ST6307 | NI | NI | NI |
c2 | ST6307 | ST8279 | NI | ST8284 | ST4350 | NI | NI |
c3 | ST8280 | ST8276 | ST8286 | ST8289 | ST8282 | ||
c4 | ST6307 | NI | ST8289 | NI | |||
c5 | ST8280 | NI | ST2678 | NI | ST8287 | ||
c6 | ST8280 | NI | |||||
c7 | ST8286 | NI | |||||
c8 | ST8271 | ST6307 | NI | ST8274 | |||
c9 | ST8275 | ST6307 | ST8271 | ST2761 | |||
c10 | ST6307 | ST8278 | |||||
c11 | ST6307 | ST8279 | ST8273 | ST8281 | NI | ||
c12 | NI | ST8288 | ST2761 | ||||
c13 | ST951 | ST8272 | |||||
c14 | NI | ST2216 | ST45 | ||||
c15 | NI | ST8289 | ST951 | ||||
c16 | NI | ||||||
c17 | NI | ||||||
c18 | NI | ST2117 | |||||
c19 | ST2117 | ST8283 | NI | NI | |||
c20 | ST2117 | ST8287 | ST8285 | ||||
c21 | ST6307 | ST8270 | NI | ||||
c22 | NI | NI | ST8279 | ST8277 | |||
c23 | ST8278 | ||||||
c24 | ST8287 | ||||||
c25 | ST8284 | ST8274 | |||||
c26 | ST2117 | ||||||
c27 | NI | ||||||
Prevalence | 100.0% | 33.3% | 82.4% | 80.0% | 90.0% | 25.0% | 42.9% |
aSequence type of C. jejuni isolate. bNot isolated.
The results of the present study show that genetically diverse C. jejuni strains can infect free-living crows. In addition, these findings show that the shedding of C. jejuni into the gastrointestinal contents is intermittent and different C. jejuni strains can alternately infect a single crow. Shyaka et al. [24] collected cloacal swab samples from 139 crows (Corvus corone and Corvus macrorhynchos) in the Tokachi area of Hokkaido, Japan, from May 2010 to May 2011, and isolated Campylobacter spp., most of which were identified as C. jejuni, from 27 (20.9%) birds. Okamura et al. [20] collected cecal content samples from 123 crows (78 Corvus corone, 28 Corvus macrorhynchos, and 17 unidentified species) in Aomori prefecture, Japan, from October 2012 to April 2014, and isolated Campylobacter spp. from all the samples, most of which were also identified as C. jejuni. Between these two studies, the sample types, timing of implementation of the surveys, and survey locations differed. These differences could influence the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. In this study, intermittent shedding of C. jejuni was observed in most of the crows. Since the timing of shedding differs depending on the presence of Campylobacter infection in crows, the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in crows fluctuates widely. The fact that, different C. jejuni strains alternately infected a crow is consistent with the results of another study demonstrating that strain-specific immune response by the host is important in controlling a shift in C. jejuni strains during the infection period [25].
Although, a large number of C. jejuni isolates from humans, broilers, and cattle in Japan have been genetically characterized by MLST [2, 3, 11, 19, 20, 29], the STs of C. jejuni isolates in those studies considerably differ from the C. jejuni isolates in crows captured in the present study. Although, CC21 is the most frequent lineage in humans, broilers, and cattle in Japan [2, 3, 11, 19, 20, 29], it was not isolated in the present study. Of the 55 C. jejuni isolates obtained in the present study, 35 (63.6%) were classified into 21 novel STs. These isolates might be more adaptable to crows than to humans, broilers, and cattle. ST6307, the most frequent ST in this study, has never been isolated from humans and livestock in Japan, although ST6307 is associated with wild birds and environmental water overseas according to the PubMLST database of C. jejuni/coli isolates (https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_campylobacter_isolates). The ST6307 isolates were obtained from eight different crows from 1st May to 10th June and all isolates were susceptible to all the antimicrobials tested, suggesting that the ST6307 clone circulates in crows in Tochigi prefecture. Similarly, ST2117, the second most frequent ST in this study, has never been isolated in Japan, although ST2117 is associated with four human sporadic cases in Scotland according to the PubMLST database. Okamura et al. [20] reported that C. jejuni isolates belonging to ST2761, ST9010, and ST1540 were obtained from free-living crows in Aomori prefecture, Japan. Among these, ST2761 was isolated in this study as well, and the remaining two were phylogenetically more related to C. jejuni isolated from crows in this study than those isolated from human campylobacteriosis (Fig. 1). ST45 isolates belonging to CC45 have also been obtained from sporadic human cases and broilers in Japan. CC45 is a generalist lineage with broad host ranges [15, 23].
All C. jejuni isolates obtained in the present study were susceptible to ciprofloxacin. In contrast, ciprofloxacin resistance in C. jejuni has been prevalent in humans, broilers, and cattle in Japan [3, 9, 10, 16, 19, 29]. In this study, low prevalence rates of C. jejuni isolates resistant to tetracycline and/or streptomycin were observed. The two antimicrobial resistance genes, tetO and aadE, are known to occur on transmissible plasmids in Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus agalactiae [4, 31]. Some reports show high sequence similarity in plasmids between C. jejuni and Gram-positive bacterial genera [8, 26]. Moreover, Nirdnoy et al. [18] reported that pCG8245 carrying tetO and aadE was mobilized using a P incompatibility group plasmid from C. jejuni to Escherichia coli. These reports suggest that C. jejuni exchanges transmissible plasmids with E. coli and Gram-positive bacterial genera. Therefore, these antimicrobial resistance genes could be transmitted from bacteria found in the gastrointestinal tracts of crows. All C. jejuni isolates classified as ST8289 were resistant to tetracycline and found in three crows, suggesting that antimicrobial-resistant C. jejuni strains circulate in crow populations under conditions of no antibiotic selection pressure.
In conclusion, although various types of C. jejuni infect crows living in Tochigi prefecture, Japan, most of these strains differ from those isolated from humans, broilers, and cattle in Japan. Therefore, the importance of free-living crows as reservoirs of Campylobacter infection in broilers and cattle may be limited. However, Campylobacter spp. in free-living crows should be continuously monitored because crows can have generalist lineages in their gastrointestinal tracts.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to students at Utsunomiya University for helping us collect the cloacal swab samples.
REFERENCES
- 1.Allen V. M., Weaver H., Ridley A. M., Harris J. A., Sharma M., Emery J., Sparks N., Lewis M., Edge S.2008. Sources and spread of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. during partial depopulation of broiler chicken flocks. J. Food Prot. 71: 264–270. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-71.2.264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Asakura H., Brüggemann H., Sheppard S. K., Ekawa T., Meyer T. F., Yamamoto S., Igimi S.2012. Molecular evidence for the thriving of Campylobacter jejuni ST-4526 in Japan. PLoS One 7: e48394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Asakura H., Taguchi M., Ekawa T., Yamamoto S., Igimi S.2013. Continued widespread dissemination and increased poultry host fitness of Campylobacter jejuni ST-4526 and ST-4253 in Japan. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114: 1529–1538. doi: 10.1111/jam.12147 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aslam M., Diarra M. S., Masson L.2012. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genotypes of Enterococcus faecalis recovered from a pork processing plant. J. Food Prot. 75: 1486–1491. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2013. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard, 4th ed CLSI document VET01-A4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2016. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria, 3rd ed., CLSI guideline M45. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Frosth S., Karlsson-Lindsjö O., Niazi A., Fernström L. L., Hansson I.2020. Identification of transmission routes of Campylobacter and on-farm measures to reduce Campylobacter in chicken. Pathogens 9: 363. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9050363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Guirado P., Miró E., Iglesias-Torrens Y., Navarro F., Campoy S., Alioto T. S., Gómez-Garrido J., Madrid C., Balsalobre C.2022. A new variant of the aadE-sat4-aphA-3 gene cluster found in a conjugative plasmid from a MDR Campylobacter jejuni isolate. Antibiotics (Basel) 11: 466. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Haruna M., Sasaki Y., Murakami M., Ikeda A., Kusukawa M., Tsujiyama Y., Ito K., Asai T., Yamada Y.2012. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter in broiler flocks in Japan. Zoonoses Public Health 59: 241–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2011.01441.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haruna M., Sasaki Y., Murakami M., Mori T., Asai T., Ito K., Yamada Y.2013. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates from beef cattle and pigs in Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 75: 625–628. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0432 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kiatsomphob S., Taniguchi T., Tarigan E., Latt K. M., Jeon B., Misawa N.2019. Aerotolerance and multilocus sequence typing among Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from humans, broiler chickens, and cattle in Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 81: 1144–1151. doi: 10.1292/jvms.19-0228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kumagai Y., Pires S. M., Kubota K., Asakura H.2020. Attributing human foodborne diseases to food sources and water in Japan using analysis of outbreak surveillance data. J. Food Prot. 83: 2087–2094. doi: 10.4315/JFP-20-151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Linton D., Lawson A. J., Owen R. J., Stanley J.1997. PCR detection, identification to species level, and fingerprinting of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli direct from diarrheic samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35: 2568–2572. doi: 10.1128/jcm.35.10.2568-2572.1997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Maeda I., Siddiki M. S. R., Nozawa-Takeda T., Tsukahara N., Tani Y., Naito T., Sugita S.2013. Population abundance of potentially pathogenic organisms in intestinal microbiome of jungle crow (Corvus macrorhynchos) shown with 16S rRNA gene-based microbial community analysis. BioMed Res. Int. 2013: 438956. doi: 10.1155/2013/438956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Marotta F., Janowicz A., Di Marcantonio L., Ercole C., Di Donato G., Garofolo G., Di Giannatale E.2020. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of C. jejuni isolates from Italian wild bird populations. Pathogens 9: 304. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9040304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.National Veterinary Assay Laboratory of Japan. 2018. Report on the Japanese veterinary antimicrobial resistance monitoring system 2014–2015; National Veterinary Assay Laboratory, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tokyo. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ng L. K., Martin I., Alfa M., Mulvey M.2001. Multiplex PCR for the detection of tetracycline resistant genes. Mol. Cell. Probes 15: 209–215. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.2001.0363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nirdnoy W., Mason C. J., Guerry P.2005. Mosaic structure of a multiple-drug-resistant, conjugative plasmid from Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 2454–2459. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2454-2459.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ohishi T., Aoki K., Ishii Y., Usui M., Tamura Y., Kawanishi M., Ohnishi K., Tateda K.2017. Molecular epidemiological analysis of human- and chicken-derived isolates of Campylobacter jejuni in Japan using next-generation sequencing. J. Infect. Chemother. 23: 165–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2016.11.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Okamura M., Kaneko M., Ojima S., Sano H., Shindo J., Shirafuji H., Yamamoto S., Tanabe T., Yoshikawa Y., Hu D. L.2018. Differential distribution of Salmonella serovars and Campylobacter spp. isolates in free-living crows and broiler chickens in Aomori, Japan. Microbes Environ. 33: 77–82. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME17183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sasaki Y., Tsujiyama Y., Tanaka H., Yoshida S., Goshima T., Oshima K., Katayama S., Yamada Y.2011. Risk factors for Campylobacter colonization in broiler flocks in Japan. Zoonoses Public Health 58: 350–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01370.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sasaki Y., Murakami M., Haruna M., Maruyama N., Mori T., Ito K., Yamada Y.2013. Prevalence and characterization of foodborne pathogens in dairy cattle in the eastern part of Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 75: 543–546. doi: 10.1292/jvms.12-0327 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sheppard S. K., Cheng L., Méric G., de Haan C. P., Llarena A. K., Marttinen P., Vidal A., Ridley A., Clifton-Hadley F., Connor T. R., Strachan N. J., Forbes K., Colles F. M., Jolley K. A., Bentley S. D., Maiden M. C., Hänninen M. L., Parkhill J., Hanage W. P., Corander J.2014. Cryptic ecology among host generalist Campylobacter jejuni in domestic animals. Mol. Ecol. 23: 2442–2451. doi: 10.1111/mec.12742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shyaka A., Kusumoto A., Chaisowwong W., Okouchi Y., Fukumoto S., Yoshimura A., Kawamoto K.2015. Virulence characterization of Campylobacter jejuni isolated from resident wild birds in Tokachi area, Japan. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 77: 967–972. doi: 10.1292/jvms.15-0090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Skånseng B., Trosvik P., Zimonja M., Johnsen G., Bjerrum L., Pedersen K., Wallin N., Rudi K.2007. Co-infection dynamics of a major food-borne zoonotic pathogen in chicken. PLoS Pathog. 3: e175. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Taylor D. E.1986. Plasmid-mediated tetracycline resistance in Campylobacter jejuni: expression in Escherichia coli and identification of homology with streptococcal class M determinant. J. Bacteriol. 165: 1037–1039. doi: 10.1128/jb.165.3.1037-1039.1986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Weis A. M., Miller W. A., Byrne B. A., Chouicha N., Boyce W. M., Townsend A. K.2014. Prevalence and pathogenic potential of campylobacter isolates from free-living, human-commensal American crows. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80: 1639–1644. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03393-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.World Health Organization. 2013. The global view of campylobacteriosis: report of an expert consultation. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564601 [accessed on May 24, 2022].
- 29.Yamada K., Saito R., Muto S., Sasaki M., Murakami H., Aoki K., Ishii Y., Tateda K.2019. Long-term observation of antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characterisation of Campylobacter jejuni isolated in a Japanese general hospital 2000–2017. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 18: 59–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2019.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yang Y., Feye K. M., Shi Z., Pavlidis H. O., Kogut M., J Ashworth A., Ricke S. C.2019. A historical review on antibiotic resistance of foodborne Campylobacter. Front. Microbiol. 10: 1509. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhou K., Xie L., Han L., Guo X., Wang Y., Sun J.2017. ICESag37, a novel integrative and conjugative element carrying antimicrobial resistance genes and potential virulence factors in Streptococcus agalactiae. Front. Microbiol. 8: 1921. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]