Skip to main content
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science logoLink to The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
. 2022 Jun 2;84(7):1001–1009. doi: 10.1292/jvms.21-0624

Osteological and vascular morphology and electrolyte homeostasis of sea turtles

Masataka YOSHIDA 1,2,*, Masaharu MOTOKAWA 3, Hideki ENDO 1
PMCID: PMC9353092  PMID: 35650112

Abstract

Sea turtles have well developed lacrimal glands for their electrolyte homeostasis. In turtles, stapedial artery and palatine artery send branches to supply orbital region, but supply artery for lacrimal glands was not identified. Micro-CT scans showed dorsoventrally large lacrimal glands of sea turtle are supplied by both stapedial artery and palatine artery. The circulatory pattern in cranial region was reconstructed based on the micro-CT scans, showing that sea turtle has basically similar pattern with the common snapping turtle: stapedial artery supplies orbital region and mandibular artery is ramified from stapedial artery. We also investigate the foramen stapedio-temporalis in turtles using osteological specimens. The foramen stapedio-temporalis, where the stapedial artery passes through, has different size among four families of turtles. We compared the sum of cross sections of left and right foramen stapedio-temporalis since homeostasis of one individual is maintained by a pair of lacrimal glands. The size difference may reflect primarily the share of stapedial artery against palatine artery in cranial circulation pattern and blood supply of orbital regions. Our observations confirmed a significantly larger cross-section in the foramen stapedio-temporalis of sea turtles than other freshwater/terrestrial turtles. Since the circulatory pattern is shared, the size difference of foramen stapedio-temporalis reflects the amount of arterial blood supply to lacrimal glands. Therefore, the size of the foramen stapedio-temporalis may indicate marine adaptation of turtles and are applicable to both fossil and osteological specimens.

Keywords: Cheloniidae, lacrimal gland, marine adaptation, osteology, stapedial artery


Sea turtles (order Testudines, superfamily Chelonioidea) depend on the salt glands in their orbital region for electrolyte homeostasis [23, 45]. Eliminating seawater salts is essential to maintaining electrolyte homeostasis and avoiding dehydration [18, 45]. Sea turtles use salt glands to eliminate excessive salts. The homeostatic burden is reflected in an increase or a decrease in fluid secretion from the salt glands [31, 37, 42, 43]. Lesion or disorder in salt glands result failure to maintain electrolyte homeostasis and may cause death of sea turtles [39]. Other marine or estuarine reptiles and birds also use salt excretion glands in the cranial regions [45]. This may be because, unlike mammals, reptiles and birds do not have efficient kidneys, which produce hypersthenuria [45]. Enlarged orbital glands of sea turtles are not yet fully understood, recent studies even suggest the relationship between magnetic sensing and orbital glands [35, 36].

Studies of cranial structure of turtles always face difficulty since observation of structure of interest demands somewhat destructive process including disarticulation [26]. Salt glands are also not directly observable because the organ is encased in the osteological elements of the orbital rim [12]. This positioning of salt glands makes it difficult to measure them without removing the surrounding tissue or bony elements. Carcasses usually begin decomposing from soft tissues at the distal end in sample collection, including the snout and orbit. As a result, there are few sea turtle specimens without decomposed soft tissues. Therefore, using osteological specimens is beneficial to observe relationships between morphological characters and their habitat.

Histological and histochemical studies have revealed turtle have two orbital glands, but there is disagreement over the identity of these glands [41]. One gland is found anterior to the eyeball in the orbit, called harderian gland [1, 12,13,14,15, 17, 48] and anterior lacrimal gland [5, 6]. Another gland is found posterior to the eyeball in the orbit, called lacrimal gland [1, 12,13,14,15, 17, 48] and harderian gland [5, 6]. Even though the nomenclature is in confusion, it is agreed that posterior gland secrets salts for osmoregulation [5, 15, 16]. In the current study, we follow [16, 48] and use harderian gland for the anterior orbital gland and lacrimal gland for the posterior gland (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

3D reconstruction of turtle skull. Eyeball is in gray, harderian glands is in green and lacriml gland is in pink. White arrow indicates position of foramen. Each scale bar is 25 mm. A. Left lateral view of skull of Chelydra serpentinaB. Right lateral view of the skull of Lepidochelys olivacea. C. Dorsal view of skull of Chelydra serpentina. Skull roof is removed. D. Dorsal view of skull of Lepidochelys olivacea. Skull roof is removed. E. Posterior view of left eyeball and orbital glands of Chelydra serpentina. F. Posterior view of right eyeball and both orbital glands of Lepidochelys olivacea. Note well-developed stapedial artery supply orbital region in both Chelydra serpentina and Lepidochelys olivacea.

Orbital region receives arterial blood from the cranial and carotid arteries [1, 3, 25, 27]. The relationships between cranio-vascular morphology and phylogeny in turtles have been discussed [20, 25,26,27, 44]. Patterns of carotid circulation of turtles and relationship to phylogeny is under discussion [25, 44], but variation between clades have long gather interests [3, 20, 21, 25,26,27, 34]. The two arteries, stapedial artery and palatine artery are known to run into orbital region [3, 26]. In sea turtles, the carotid circulation is considered as mostly like other Trionychia turtles in earlier studies [3, 25]. This has been understood as an example of parallel evolution [20, 25] since sea turtles and soft-shelled turtles are not closely related [28]. Internal carotid artery branches stapedial artery posterior to skull. The stapedial artery passes through the foramen stapedio-temporalis (FST) from ventral to dorsal and its development is considered as basal character for turtles [3, 21, 25,26,27, 44]. Foramen stapedio-temporalis opens on the dorsal surface of the skull, contributed by protic and quadrate with no flexibility of articulation (Fig. 1).

Arterial wall can adapt by vasodilation for shear stress due to the increase of blood pressure. Artery can remodel and maintain its structure in response to the blood flow and pressure [32]. According to the Poiseuille law, arterial blood flow amount should be related to the diameter of artery and pressure. Arterial circulation primarily vasodilates to increase blood flow before gaining pressure. Reptilian lacrimal gland cells are not capable of excreting salts since water will be lost under hypertension [22]. Also, the stapedial artery send branches for the eyeball and its surrounding capillaries. Rise of blood pressure in these branches affect intraocular pressure rise and may harm ocular and systemic condition of sea turtles [11]. Thus, when a larger volume of arterial blood should be supplied to salt gland with limited rise of blood pressure, the stapedial arteries for lacrimal glands should vasodilate as much as possible. The vasodilation of stapedial artery is dominated by the canalis stapedio-temporalis and FST.

Several lineages of turtles have tried to expand their habitat into ocean and extant superfamily Chelonioidea is one and only successful group among them. At the same time, other lineages of turtles radiate diversified environment. Our study tries to establish the relationship between development of lacrimal glands and ecology, by cranial morphology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined 3 fixed specimens and 168 turtle osteological specimens from museum collections. We accessed Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, Odawara, Kanagawa, Japan (KPMNH), Kyoto University Museum, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan (KUZ), National Museum of Nature and Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan (NMNS) and The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan (UMUT).

We obtained micro X-ray computer-tomography scan from head samples of a common Snapping Turtle Chelydra serpentina (Cs) (UMUT-21293), a hawksbill sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata (Ei) (KPM-NFR-526) and a ridley sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea (Lo) (NSM-H6187). We used micro X-ray computer-tomography system (TXS-UF225CT; TESCO Corp., Yokohama, Japan) at UMUT. To highlight arteries, we preliminary injected physiological saline solution by physiological pressure into the common carotid artery. Samples are fixed by 80% ethanol after injection. Scans are conducted at 150 kV and 0.15 mA, then reconstructed using 3D Slicer v4.13.0 (https://www.slicer.org/) [19]. The intravascular lumen of interested arteries could be distinguished from other soft tissue by the difference of intensity in the 3D reconstructed images (Figs. 1 and 2). Observed intravascular lumen of arteries should be vasodilated by the injected saline solution, with physiological pressure unique to each sample. Therefore, the quantitative comparison of cross section between arteries are possible but inadequate in between samples. At the same time, our observation by micro X-ray computer-tomography scan do not obtain all of circulatory system in cranial region. The 3D reconstruction of Lo specimen (NSM-H6187) excludes left eyeball and surrounding tissue for another dissection.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

3D reconstruction of turtle skull, lateral portion removed. Eyeball is in gray, harderian glands is in green and lacrimal gland is in pink. White arrow indicates position of foramen anteriomandibulare. Each scale bar is 50 mm. A. Left lateral view of Chelydra serpentina. B. Left lateral view of Lepidochelys olivacea. C. Left lateral view of Eretmochelys imbricata. Mandibular artery of Lepidochelys olivacea and Eretmochelys imbricata are not vestigial, but distinct as in Chelydra serpentina.

We also obtained cranial sizes for 36 distances [21] using digital calipers on osteological specimens. Measurements were taken from specimens of family Chelydridae (n=23), Cheloniidae (n=99), Kinosternidae (n=1), Emydidae (n=33), Geoemydidae (n=1), Testudinidae (n=10), and Podocnemididae (n=1) (Table 1).

Table 1. List of examined samples.

Family Genus and specie Number of samples
Institution
Total Male Female Unidentified
Chelydridae Chelydra serpentina 22 (10) (12) UMUT
Macrochelys temminckii 1 (1) UMUT

Cheloniidae Caretta caretta 44 (3) (22) (21) KUZ
2 (2) KPMNH
Chelonia mydas 51 (9) (26) (16) KUZ
2 (2) KPMNH

Kinosternidae Staurotypus triporcatus 1 (1) UMUT

Emydidae Trachemys scripta 33 (15) (18) UMUT

Geoemydidae Mauremys japonica 1 (1) UMUT

Testudinidae Centrochelys sulcata 1 (1) UMUT
Geochelone elegans 3 (1) (2) UMUT
Geochelone platynota 1 (1) UMUT
Malacochersus tornieri 1 (1) UMUT
Manouria emys 1 (1) UMUT
Stigmochelys pardalis 1 (1) UMUT
Testudo gracea 1 (1) UMUT
Testudo horsfieldii 1 (1) UMUT

Podocnemididae Podocnemys unifilis 1 (1) UMUT

KPMNH, Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History, Odawara, Kanagawa, Japan. KUZ, Zoological Collection of Kyoto University Museum, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan. UMUT, The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Family Chelydridae specimens included one Alligator Snapping Turtle Macrochelys temminckii (Mt), and Cs. Family Emydidae samples in this research were all Red-eared Slider Trachemys scripta (Ts). UMUT acquired Snapping Turtle specimens and Red-eared Slider specimens from Chiba Biodiversity Center, Chiba, Japan, from their extermination program for invasive species. Family Cheloniidae specimens included Chelonia mydas (Cm) and Caretta caretta (Cc). The sea turtle specimens stored in the KUZ collection were originally collected in collaboration with the Sea Turtle Association of Japan (non-profit organization in Osaka, Japan), based on stranded or bycatch individuals found on the beach. Although available number of examples from family Kinosternidae, Geoemydidae, Testudinidae and Podocnemididae are insufficient to produce a statistically adequate, we added them for comparison. Since cranial-arterial circulation is different in family Kinosternidae [1, 25, 27], extremely small FST is observed in our Staurotypus triporcatus sample (UMUT-21018), and the right FST is completely closed.

All the Snapping Turtles, sea turtles, and Red-eared Sliders were from wild environments. Other specimens are came from zoos and aquaria.

The authors obtained body mass and carapace size in the UMUT specimens if the carcasses were not badly damaged. We measured the body size of turtles [24] at straight carapace length (SCL), curved carapace length, straight carapace width, curved carapace width, plastron length and plastron width using calipers and a tape measure. We used the data from the collection catalogue [49] for several turtle specimens stored in the UMUT collection. In those data, body sizes were measured in the same way as in this study.

We obtained the size of the FST indirectly, as direct measurements of osteological foramen using calipers are difficult to achieve [26]. We made casts of each foramen with vinyl polysiloxane impression materials used in dentistry (GC EXAFINE (c) PUTTY; GC Corp., Tokyo, Japan) material). We removed the silicon cast after the solidification by hand. Then, we measured the cast at its maximum (MaD) and minimum (MiD) diameters with a digital micrometer or a digital caliper. MaD/2×MiD/2×π obtains the cross-sectional area of FST. Then, we added the right and left cross-sectional values to obtain the total FST value for each specimen to represent electrolyte homeostasis capability of individual. In several samples we could only measure one side of the skull and one of two foramina. We doubled the value of one measurable side and regarded it as the FST value. A quantitative comparison of the relative size of cranial foramina between taxa or individuals, requires the effect of body size to be removed. However, all the sea turtle specimens lacked a record of their body mass, and most lacked the body size due to the condition of carcasses in the museum collection. The SCL was recorded for 32 specimens out of 98 specimens. The other 67 specimens lacked any body size records.

The relationships between the skull size and carapace size were calculated [38]. The cranio-caudal length from snout to crista supraoccipitalis is best correlated to SCL. The cranio-caudal length of the skull from the snout to lower jaw articulation is much weakly corelated to SCL. For the 67 specimens without body size data, the estimated size of the SCL was calculated from cranio-caudal length of skull (snout-crista supraoccipitalis). Of these 67 specimens, 66 had complete skull for measuring cranio-caudal length from the snout to the crista supraoccipitalis. One last specimen (KUZR-070202, Cc) lacked the crista supraoccipitalis; therefore, we adopted calculations using the cranio-caudal length from snout to lower jaw articulation. Then, we applied another calculation [47] to estimate the body mass of every individual based on the real and estimated carapace size. To illustrate the allometric growth of the FST, we plotted body mass and FST on a scatter chart, log to log scale [33]. Linear regression lines are obtained to indicate the allometric growth of FST of family Chelydridae, family Cheloniidae, family Emydidae and family Testudinidae (Fig. 4). The common logarithm of the cross-sectional area of the FST was divided by the common logarithm of the body mass to obtain the relative value of the size of the FST with body size removed (rFST) (Figs. 5 and 6).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

X axis is common logarithm of body mass as the body size and Y axis is the common logarithm of cross rection of foramen stapedio-temporalis. Body mass includes estimated data calculated from the skull size. Slope shows linear regression of family Chelydridae, family Cheloniidae, family Emydidae and family Testudinidae.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Boxplot shows relative size of foramen stapedio-temporalis of family Chelydridae, Cheloniidae Emydidae, and Testudinidae. The normality of the distribution is tested by the Shapillo–Wilk test. Multiple comparison is conducted using the Steel–Dwass test.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Relative size of foramen stapedio-temporalis value of Chelydra serpentina, Caretta caretta, Chelonia mydas, and Trachemys scripta.

RESULTS

3D model of arteries and other structure of skull is obtained from the micro-CT scan (Figs. 1 and 2). In Lo, in the region of our interest, two arteries supplying orbital glands are confirmed. Palatine arteries give rise to the branch for anterior harderian glands. On the other hand, stapedial artery runs dorsally in fossa temporalis and splits several branches to supply lacrimal glands. Palatine artery also send branch to the ventral part of lacrimal gland and eyeball (Fig. 3(2)).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Diagram of right cranial circulation of turtles. In dorsal view, snout toward the top of page. (1) Chelydra serpentina. (2) Cheloniidae sea turtle. CCI, canalis caroticus internus; CC, canalis cavernosus; CST, canalis stapedio-temporalis; FAC, foramen anterior canalis carotici interni; FAM, foramen anteriomandibulare; FCL, foramen caroticum laterale; FPC, foramen posterior canalis carotici interni; FST, foramen stapedio-temporalis.

In Cs, palatine artery and stapedial artery bifurcates in the posterior margin of orbital fossa, then send branches to supply lacrimal glands, eyeball, and harder glands (Fig. 3(1)). The size of glands was not obtained since separation of organs were not clear without stain.

The linear regression line of family Chelydridae (y=0.3523 × −0.5572), family Cheloniidae (y=0.5362 × −1.02), family Emydidae (y=0.2717 × −0.5081) and Family Testudinidae (y=0.5362 × −1.02) for allometric growth of FST is obtained (Fig. 4). Allometric growth of FST is hypoallometric in all families, but family Cheloniidae have largest slope suggesting that FST of sea turtles grows faster than others. To determine the comparison between families, we use rFST as FST size with body size removed. rFST of family Chelydridae (n=23), family Cheloniidae (n=98), family Emydidae (n=33), and family Testudinidae (n=10) samples are shown in the boxplot (Fig. 5). Family Kinosternidae (n=1), family Geoemydidae (n=1), and family Podocnemididae (n=1) were excluded from the analysis here because there were too few samples available to obtain statistically significant trends. It is notable that Kinosternid turtle Staurotypus triporcatus (UMUT-21018) has right FST completely closed. Several Trachemys scripta (UMUT-19328 and 19345) have extremely reduced and almost closed FST and their rFST are negative value (Figs. 4, 5, 6).

We tested the normality of the distribution of the rFST with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normality was not rejected for the family Cheloniidae samples (P<0.001), but it was for family Chelydridae (P=0.6890), family Emydidae (P=0.1229), and family Testudinidae (P=0.0932). Since the rFST value of family Chelydridae, Emydidae, and Testudinidae were not normally distributed, we used the Kruskal–Wallis test to determine the differences between the four families. rFST values are significantly different between groups (P<0.001). Steel–Dwass tests were performed as a post-hoc test to develop multiple comparisons of the four families. Family Cheloniidae was significantly different from family Chelydridae (P<0.001), family Emydidae (P<0.001), and family Testudinidae (P<0.001). Family Chelydridae was also significantly different from family Emydidae (P<0.001). Family Testudinidae was not significantly different from family Chelydridae (P=0.8595), but it was significantly different from family Emydidae (P<0.001).

In family Cheloniidae, Cc (n=46) was not normally distributed, but Cm (n=53) was. We performed a Man–Whitney test and found that Cc has a significantly larger rFST than Cm (P<0.001) (Fig. 6). Significantly larger rFST of Cc is also observed in comparison of Cc female and Cm female (Kruskal–Wallis test, P=0.0295). Differences by sex occur in Cm. In Chelonia, males (n=9) have significantly smaller rFST than females (n=26) (Kruskal–Wallis test, P=0.0334) (Fig. 4). Unlike Chelonia, the sexual difference is not significant (Kruskal–Wallis test, P=0.6587) in Caretta. The sampling bias should be taken into account because the specimens of Cc had poor records of sexual determination: female (n=22), male (n=3), and unidentified (n=23) (Table 1).

In other families, sexual differences are not found either in Cs (P=0.3226) or in Ts (P=0.2328) (Fig. 6).

DISCUSSION

Our reconstruction of circulatory patterns of both Ei and Lo basically agrees with Cs, showing the pattern A [25, 26] (Fig. 3). Our observations on circulatory system of Ei and Lo (Fig. 3(2)) are different from the observation of Cm in previous study [3]. In the observation of Cm [3], the cranial region mainly supplied by palatine arteries. In addition, the lower jaw is supplied from the mandibular artery branched from the palatine artery. However, in our observations on Ei and Lo by micro-CT, the cranial region is mainly supplied by stapedial arteries (Fig. 1B, 1D and 1F, 2B and 2C). The lower jaw region is supplied by the mandibular artery, the branch of stapedial artery (Fig. 2B and 2C). This mandibular artery was considered as “vestigial” in an earlier study [3]. The mandibular artery of Cs (Fig. 2A) is also the branch of stapedial artery and agrees with the previous observation [3].

The calculated rFST value for family Cheloniidae is the largest and is significantly different from all other groups. Micro-CT scan of Lo reveals that lachrymal glands receives arterial blood not only from stapedial artery but also palatine artery (Fig. 3(2)). Therefore, rFST value itself is not enough to discuss the capacity of lachrymal glands. However, our findings indicate that cross section of FST is somehow corelated to the development of osmoregulation. The regression line we obtained from the scatter plot (Fig. 4) shows allometric growth of FST size in all examined specimens. It is considered that FST is prominent and developed structure in cranial circulation in earlier studies [3, 26, 34], but the size of FST basically grow as the body mass.

Our results also indicate a difference in rFST between the freshwater turtles family Chelydridae and Emydidae. Family Chelydridae samples of Cs and Mt were examined. Except for one sample of Mt (UMUT-21058), the rest are Cs. The examined samples of family Emydidae in this study were all Ts. Although the two have similar habitats and were sampled from a similar place, Ts had significantly smaller rFST than Cs. The rFST value of Ts was also significantly smaller than those for family Testudines.

Ts has a small rFST value than other turtles. According to earlier studies, the cranial arterial circulatory structures of family Chelydridae, family Emydidae, and family Testudinidae do not differ [27] and share similar pattern [25, 26]. However, rFST value of Ts is significantly smaller than other turtles and almost closed FST is observed on several specimens, Ts should not rely on stapedial artery in cranial circulation. It is necessary to study further anatomical structure, but pattern A [25, 26] may not include Ts.

Family Testudinidae samples examined is limited: Centrochelys (n=1), Geochelone (n=4), Malacocherus (n=1), Manouria (n=1), Stigmochelys (n=1), and Testudo (n=2) (Table 1), although their known habitats are rather diverse. Our result suggests that there are no significant differences (P=0.8595) between family Chelydridae and Testudinidae (Fig. 5). The regression lines obtained from scatter plot (Fig. 4) also show two families share similar trend. Thus, terrestrial tortoises, may share common trends in rFST value with freshwater turtles. Considering the diverse habitats of family Testudinidae, ranging from forests to deserts, their physiological burden should also be diverse. Since the enlargement of the rFST value does not occur in family Testudinidae, their osmoregulation should be maintained in other ways. This matches to the earlier findings indicating that they can concentrate uric acid [4].

There was a significant difference in rFST for family Cheloniidae. Cc had a significantly larger rFST than Cm. Both Cc and Cm are completely marine-adapted animals and have fully functioning lacrimal glands for osmoregulation. The smaller rFST value of Cm should be sufficient for ocean dwelling life, so the larger rFST of Cc suggests a greater homeostatic burden. Diversity in the food habitat of sea turtles is well known. Cc are also omnivorous, eating crustaceans and shellfish throughout their lives [7, 40]. Cm are omnivorous until maturity and turn herbivorous when they mature and complete migration [8, 10]. The preference for feeding habits changes in response to the availability of food resources in their habitat [7]. Feeding habitat related morphological differenced are recognized to exist between Cc and Cm [9, 48]. The contents of their blood plasma are also affected by the differences in their food habitats [46]. Phosphorous and sulfur in Cm and Ei blood plasma increase significantly in response to albuminous foods in captive environments. In addition, Cc maintains a lower potassium value than Cm and Ei both in and out of captive environments. This indicates that Cc has a better homeostatic function than other sea turtle species. Potassium is found in contents of excreted tear fluids of sea turtles [23], not phosphorous and sulfur. Lacrimal glands are involuntary organs and the ratio of potassium and sodium in tear fluids is fixed [37]. This fixed composition suggests that lacrimal glands are not responsible for excreting these excess electrolytes obtained from prey items. Further research is necessary to determine which organ is assigned for this homeostatic burden.

Another possible reason for the difference is the phylogenetic position of species. Cc belongs to tribe Carettini and Cm belongs to tribe Chelonini. To confirm the phylogenetic effects on rFST values, we should examine other family Cheloniidae members: Natator depressus of tribe Chelonini and Ei, Lo, and Lepidochelys kempii of tribe Carettini.

Besides the sea turtles completely adapted to marine life, several turtle species use blackish or marine water [2], including the Diamondback Terrapin Malacleys terrapin [12,13,14] and Common Snapping Turtle Cs [29, 30]. They are not ocean residents, but merely temporal visitors. In fossil records, several linages also appear in oceanic sediments. These fossil records include evidence of adaptation to marine habitat. However, some of them may just be temporary visitors from marine environments, as is seen in extant species. Both extant and extinct turtles belong to the monophyletic order Testudines. For this phylogeny, one of the most parsimonious hypotheses is that the homeostatic function in turtles was developed through a common organ, the lacrimal glands in the orbital fossa.

The lacrimal gland, a necessary organ for electrolyte homeostasis is supplied by branches of stapedial artery in pattern A [25, 26] turtles. Turtles with other circulatory pattern are considered to be having different artery for supplying lacrimal glands. The major candidate route should be palatine artery, but not yet confirmed. Therefore, the development of FST and its relationship to lacrimal glands should be only effective in turtles with the circulatory pattern A.

One exception would be land tortoises (family Testudinidae) who can concentrate uric acid [4]. Nonetheless, the lacrimal gland’s capability should be enlarged in response to the homeostatic burdens indicated in their evolutional history. Suppose we hypothesize that the capability of lacrimal glands per cubic volume or per volume does not differ in order Testudines. In that case, it is possible to identify the homeostatic capability of both extant and extinct turtle species from their size of lacrimal glands. The current result shows that rFST value can be an index for marine adaptation in turtles. It can be used to analyze the adaptations of fossil marine turtles. Although body size may pose a difficulty, evolutionary trends can be seen in the group of similar skull proportions to the post cranium.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgments

The research was financially supported by the Sasakawa Scientific Research Grant from The Japan Science Society (Masataka Yoshida, 2019), JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 19H00534 and JP20H01381 from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Authors are very grateful to Drs Ryoko MATSUMOTO and Hajime TARU of Kanagawa Prefectural Museum of Natural History and Dr Shin-ichiro KAWADA and Ms Hiroko NAGAOKA of National Museum of Nature and Science, Japan for providing access to specimens. MY is especially grateful for Dr Takanobu Tsuihiji (National Museum of Nature and Science) for giving instruction of vessel injection, Mr Seiichiro TAKEDA and Mr Takashi TANIO (The University of Tokyo) for the assistance during specimen managements at UMUT, and Professor Ren HIRAYAMA (Waseda University) for introducing the field of turtle evolution. Authors are also very grateful to two anonymous peer reviewers for their helpful comments.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abel J. H., Jr, Ellis R. A.1966. Histochemical and electron microscopic observations on the salt secreting lacrymal glands of marine turtles. Am. J. Anat. 118: 337–357. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001180203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agha M., Ennen J. R., Bower D. S., Nowakowski A. J., Sweat S. C., Todd B. D.2018. Salinity tolerances and use of saline environments by freshwater turtles: implications of sea level rise. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 93: 1634–1648. doi: 10.1111/brv.12410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Albrecht P. W.1976. The cranial arteries of turtles and their evolutionary significance. J. Morphol. 149: 159–182. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051490203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Averill-Murray R. C.2002. Effects on survival of desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii) urinating during handling. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 4: 430–435. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Baccari G. C., Minucci S., Di Matteo L.1993. The orbital glands of the terrapin Pseudemys scripta in response to osmotic stress: a light and electron microscope study. J. Anat. 183: 21–33. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chieffi Baccari G., DiMatteo L., Minucci S.1992. The orbital glands of the chelonians Pseudemys scripta and Testudo graeca: comparative histological, histochemical and ultrastructural investigations. J. Anat. 180: 1–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bjorndal K. A.1997. Foraging ecology and nutrition of sea turtles. pp. 199–231. In: The Biology of Sea Turtles (Lutz, P. L. and Musick, J. A. eds.), CRC Press, Boca Raton. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bjorndal K. A.1980. Nutrition and grazing behavior of the green turtle Chelonia mydas. Mar. Biol. 56: 147–154. doi: 10.1007/BF00397131 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Brinkman D. D.2009. A sea turtle skull (Cheloniidae: Carettini) from the lower Miocene Nye Formation of Oregon, U.S.A. Paludicola. 7: 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carrión-Cortez J. A., Zárate P., Seminoff J. A.2010. Feeding ecology of the green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas) in the Galapagos Islands. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 90: 1005–1013. doi: 10.1017/S0025315410000226 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chittick B., Harms C.2001. Intraocular pressure of juvenile loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) held in different positions. Vet. Rec. 149: 587–589. doi: 10.1136/vr.149.19.587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cowan F. B. M.1969. Gross and microscopic anatomy of the orbital glands of Malaclemys and other emydine turtles. Can. J. Zool. 47: 723–729. doi: 10.1139/z69-120 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cowan F. B. M.1990. Does the lachrymal salt gland of Malaclemys terrapin have a significant role in osmoregulation? Can. J. Zool. 68: 1520–1524. doi: 10.1139/z90-225 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cowan F. B. M.1981. Effects of salt loading on salt gland function in the euryhaline turtle, Malaclemys terrapin. J. Comp. Physiol. 145: 101–108. doi: 10.1007/BF00782600 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cowan F. B. M.1971. The ultrastructure of the lachrymal ‘salt’ gland and the Harderain gland in the euryhaline Malaclemys and some closely related stenohaline emydines. Can. J. Zool. 49: 691–697. doi: 10.1139/z71-108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cowan F. B. M.1973. The homology of cranial glands in turtles: with special reference to the nomenclature of salt glands. J. Morphol. 141: 157–169. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051410204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ellis R. A., Abel J. H., Jr1964. Intercellular channels in the salt secreting glands of marine turtles. Science 144: 1340–1342. doi: 10.1126/science.144.3624.1340 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fänge R., Schmidt-Nielsen K., Robinson M.1958. Control of secretion from the avian salt gland. Am. J. Physiol. 195: 321–326. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1958.195.2.321 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fedorov A., Beichel R., Kalpathy-Cramer J., Finet J., Fillion-Robin J. C., Pujol S., Bauer C., Jennings D., Fennessy F., Sonka M., Buatti J., Aylward S., Miller J. V., Pieper S., Kikinis R.2012. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn. Reson. Imaging 30: 1323–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gaffney E. S.1984. Historical analysis of theories of chelonian relationship. Syst. Zool. 33: 283. doi: 10.2307/2413075 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gaffney E. S.1979. Comparative cranial morphology of recent and fossil turtles. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 164: 67–376. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hildebrand M., Goslow G.2001. Analysis of Vertebrate Structure, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Holmes W. N., McBean R. L.1964. Some aspects of electrolyte excretion in the green turtle, Chelonia mydas mydas. J. Exp. Biol. 41: 81–90. doi: 10.1242/jeb.41.1.81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Iverson J. B., Lewis E. L.2018. How to measure a turtle. Herpetol. Rev. 3: 453–460. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Jamniczky H. A.2008. Turtle carotid circulation: a character analysis case study. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 93: 239–256. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00923.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jamniczky H. A., Russell A. P.2004. Cranial arterial foramen diameter in turtles: a quantitative assessment of size-independent phylogenetic signal. Anim. Biol. Leiden Neth. 54: 417–436. doi: 10.1163/1570756042729537 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jamniczky H. A., Russell A. P.2007. Reappraisal of patterns of nonmarine cryptodiran turtle carotid circulation: evidence from osteological correlates and soft tissues. J. Morphol. 268: 571–587. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Joyce W. G.2007. Phylogenetic relationships of mesozoic turtles. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. 48: 3–102. doi: 10.3374/0079-032X(2007)48[3:PROMT]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kinneary J. J.1993. Salinity relations of Chelydra serpentina in a Long Island Estuary. J. Herpetol. 27: 441. doi: 10.2307/1564834 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kinneary J. J.2021. Perspectives on salinity, immunity, and the common snapping turtle. Chelonian Conserv. Biol. 20: 144–148. doi: 10.2744/CCB-1469.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kooistra T. A., Evans D. H.1976. Sodium balance in the green turtle, Chelonia mydas, in seawater and freshwater. J. Comp. Physiol. 107: 229–240. doi: 10.1007/BF00691228 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ku D. N.1997. Blood flow in arteries. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29: 399–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.399 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Marn N., Klanjscek T., Stokes L., Jusup M.2015. Size scaling in Western North Atlantic loggerhead turtles permits extrapolation between regions, but not life stages. PLoS One 10: e0143747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McDowell S. B.1961. On the major arterial canals in the ear-region of testudinoid turtles and the classification of the Testudinoidea. Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool. Harvard. 125:23–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Natan E., Fitak R. R., Werber Y., Vortman Y.2020. Correction to ‘Symbiotic magnetic sensing: raising evidence and beyond’. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 375: 20200348. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Natan E., Vortman Y.2017. The symbiotic magnetic-sensing hypothesis: do Magnetotactic Bacteria underlie the magnetic sensing capability of animals? Mov. Ecol. 5: 22. doi: 10.1186/s40462-017-0113-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nicolson S. W., Lutz P. L.1989. Salt gland function in the green sea turtle Chelonia mydas. J. Exp. Biol. 144: 171–184. doi: 10.1242/jeb.144.1.171 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Okamoto K., Ouchi Y., Ishihara T., Kamezaki N.2012. Straight carapace length calculation of the loggerhead and green sea turtles from some morphological characters. Umigame Newsletter of Japan. 91: 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Orós J., Camacho M., Calabuig P., Arencibia A.2011. Salt gland adenitis as only cause of stranding of loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 95: 163–166. doi: 10.3354/dao02351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Parker D., Cooke W., Balazs G.2005. Diet of oceanic loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the Central North Pacific. Fish Bull. 103: 142–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Payne A. P.1994. The harderian gland: a tercentennial review. J. Anat. 185: 1–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Reina R. D., Cooper P. D.2000. Control of salt gland activity in the hatchling green sea turtle, Chelonia mydas. J. Comp. Physiol. B 170: 27–35. doi: 10.1007/s003600050004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reina R.2000. Salt gland blood flow in the hatchling green turtle, Chelonia mydas. J. Comp. Physiol. B 170: 573–580. doi: 10.1007/s003600000136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rollot Y., Evers S. W., Joyce W. G.2021. A review of the carotid artery and facial nerve canal systems in extant turtles. PeerJ 8: e10475. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schmidt-Nielsen K., Fänge R.1958. Salt glands in marine reptiles. Nature 182: 783–785. doi: 10.1038/182783a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Suzuki K., Noda J., Yanagisawa M., Kawazu I., Sera K., Fukui D., Asakawa M., Yokota H.2012. Particle-induced X-ray emission analysis of elements in plasma from wild and captive sea turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata, Chelonia mydas, and Caretta caretta) in Okinawa, Japan. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 148: 302–308. doi: 10.1007/s12011-012-9375-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wabnitz C., Pauly D.2008. Length–weight relationships and additional growth parameters for sea turtles. Fish. Cent. Res. Rep. 10: 92–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wyneken J.2001. The anatomy of sea turtles. U.S. Department of Commerce NOAA Technical Memorandum. 470: 1–172. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yoshida M., Endo H.2020. Catalogue of the Collection of Turtle Specimens, The University Museum, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo. [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

RESOURCES