Skip to main content
Mycology logoLink to Mycology
. 2022 Jul 5;13(3):223–242. doi: 10.1080/21501203.2022.2094012

New insights into the genus Gyroporus (Gyroporaceae, Boletales), with establishment of four new sections and description of five new species from China

Ming Zhang a, De-Chun Xie a,b, Chao-Qun Wang a, Wang Qiu Deng a, Tai-Hui Li a,
PMCID: PMC9354645  PMID: 35938079

ABSTRACT

Species of Gyroporus from southern China were studied in this study. Based on morphology and molecular phylogenetic analyses of DNA sequences from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (nrLSU), and the mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate ATP synthase subunit 6 (atp6), Gyroporus was divided into four main branches in the phylogenetic tree, and four sections were firstly proposed i.e. Gyroporus sect. Castaneus, G. sect. Cyanescens, G. sect. Longicystidiatus and G. sect. Pallidus. Five new species, i.e. G. alboluteus, G. atrocyanescens, G. pseudolongicystidiatus, G. pallidus and G. subcaerulescens, were revealed from China, and their phylogenetic positions were also analysed. Among them, G. alboluteus and G. pallidus were nested into the sect. Pallidus, although morphologically similar to G. castaneus; G. atrocyanescens and G. subcaerulescens, with obvious cyanescent oxidation reactions, were nested into the sect. Cyanescens; and G. pseudolongicystidiatus characterised by its long cystidia and was nested into the sect. Longicystidiatus. The new species were formally described and illustrated in the present study, and a key to the sections and species of Gyroporus in China was provided.

KEYWORDS: Eastern Asia, new taxa, phylogenetic analysis, taxonomy

Introduction

Gyroporus Quél., typified by G. cyanescens (Bull.) Quél., is a small but poorly understood bolete genus in the family Gyroporaceae of Boletales. Members of Gyroporus are widely scattered throughout temperate, subtropical and tropical regions of the world, and strongly implicated as symbionts with an array of ectotrophic plants, such as Fabaceae, Fagaceae, Myrtaceae, Pinaceae, Phyllanthaceae, etc. (Singer et al. 1983; Agerer 1999; Raidl et al. 2006; Watling 2006, 2008; Wilson et al. 2012). Species in Gyroporus can be easily identified by the brittle and hollow stipe, the white to yellowish white hymenophore unchanging or changing to blue when bruised, white spore print, ellipsoid basidiospores and the presence of clamp connections (Singer 1986; Watling 2008; Das et al. 2017; Magnago et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2021; Xie et al. 2022). However, it is extremely complicated to determine their taxonomic positions at the species level owing to the overlap of phenotypic variation among species. Recently, molecular phylogenetic studies have provided more effective and accurate evidences for species identification of Gyroporus, and some new species have been reported (Das et al. 2017; Magnago et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2021; Xie et al. 2022), while the gene of mitochondrial adenosine triphosphate ATP synthase subunit 6 (atp6) has been identified as a utility DNA barcoding marker to determine the infrageneric relationships of Gyroporus (Davoodian et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2021).

In China, sixteen species have been recorded, including eight species originally reported from China, i.e. G. alpinus Yan C. Li, C. Huang & Zhu L. Yang, G. brunneofloccosus T.H. Li, W.Q. Deng & B. Song, G. flavocyanescens Yan C. Li, C. Huang & Zhu L. Yang, G. memnonius N.K. Zeng, H.J. Xie & M.S. Su, G. porphyreus N.K. Zeng, H.J. Xie & Zhi Q. Liang, G. pseudomicrosporus M. Zang, G. subglobosus N.K. Zeng, H.J. Xie, L.P. Tang & M. Mu, and G. tuberculatosporus M. Zang (Zang 1986; Zang et al. 1996; Li and Song 2003; Huang et al. 2021; Xie et al. 2022).

However, a recent study proved that G. pseudomicrosporus is a member of Gyrodon Opat. (Huang et al. 2021). Although G. castaneus (Bull.) Quél. and G. cyanescens, originally reported from Europe, have been widely reported in China (Chiu 1948, 1957; Zang 1986; Bi et al. 1994; Wu et al. 2013; Tang 2015; Xie et al. 2022), recent phylogenetic studies indicated that G. castaneus might be only distributed in northeastern China; and there were no conclusive specimens or molecular data to prove the natural distribution of G. cyanescens in China (Huang et al. 2021), instead, four similar species of G. memnonius, G. paramjitii K. Das, D. Chakraborty & Vizzini, G. porphyreus and G. subglobosus were identified from subtropical and tropical regions of China (Xie et al. 2022).

In recent years, some collections of Gyroporus were found in southern China, further study based on both morphological data and molecular sequences from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS), the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (nrLSU) and the gene of atp6 proved that they represent five species new to science; and phylogenetic analyses using the molecular data from all species with known sequences worldwide revealed that the genus could be divided into four new sections. The result should contribute to further understanding the species diversity of Gyroporus in China and the taxonomic relationships of the infrageneric taxa.

Materials and methods

Morphological studies

Photographs of the fresh basidiomata were taken in the field. Specimens were dried and deposited in the Fungarium of Guangdong Institute of Microbiology (GDGM). Descriptions of macro-morphological characters and habitats were obtained from photographs and field notes. Colour codes followed Kornerup and Wanscher (1981). Microscopic observations were carried out on tissue sections stained with 5% KOH and 1% aqueous Congo red under a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Tokyo) with magnification up to 1000 × . All measurements were made in 5% KOH. For basidiospore descriptions, the notation (a–)b–c(–d) describes basidiospore dimensions, where the range b–c represented 90% or more of the measured values and “a” and “d” were the extreme values; Q referred to the length/width ratio of an individual basidiospore and Qm referred to the average Q value of all basidiospores ± sample standard deviation. All line-drawings of microstructures were made based on rehydrated materials.

DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the voucher specimens using the Sangon Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction kit (Sangon Biotech Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer pairs ITS5/ITS4 (White et al. 1990), LR0R/LR5 (Vilgalys and Hester 1990), and atp6-2/atp6-3 (Kretzer and Bruns 1999) were used for amplifying ITS, nrLSU and atp6, respectively. PCR reactions was performed in a total volume of 25 μl containing 0.5 μl template DNA, 11 μl distilled water, 0.5 μl of each primer and 12.5 μl 2 × PCR mix (DreamTaqtm Green PCR Master Mix, Fermentas). Amplification reactions were performed in a Tprofessional Standard Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) under the following conditions: 95°C for 4 min; then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 60s, annealing at 53°C for 60s, and extension at 72°C for 60s; with a final extension at 72°C for 8 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1% agarose gels and sequencing was performed on an ABI Prism® 3730 Genetic Analyser (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) at the Beijing Genomic Institute (BGI) using the same PCR primers. The raw sequences were assembled and checked with SeqMan implemented in Lasergene v7.1 (DNASTAR Inc., USA). The newly generated sequences in this study were submitted to GenBank.

Phylogenetic analyses

Sequences generated in this study and those downloaded from GenBank were combined and used for phylogenetic reconstruction. Detailed information of specimens included in this study was given in Table 1. Sequence matrix of ITS, nrLSU and atp6 were separately aligned with software MAFFT v7 using the E-INS-i strategy (Katoh and Standley 2013) and manually adjusted in MEGA 6 (Tamura et al. 2013).

Table 1.

Information on specimen used in phylogenetic analyses. Sequences newly generated in this study are indicated in bold.

Taxa Voucher Locality GenBank accession number
References
ITS nrLSU atp6
G. alboluteus GDGM25474-1 China - ON502925 ON087643 This study
G. alboluteus GDGM25474-2 China - - ON087644 This study
G. alboluteus GDGM86706 China ON502903 ON502926 ON087645 This study
G. allocyanescens REH9700A Queensland - - MF818179 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. alpinus Li1478a China MW149438 MW151268 MW452609 Huang et al. 2021
G. alpinus Li1478b China MW149435 MW151269 MW452610 Huang et al. 2021
  • G. ammophilus

AH:45814 Spain KX869878 KX869892 - Crous et al. 2016
G. ammophilus AH:45842 Spain KX869876 KX869890 - Crous et al. 2016
G. ammophilus AH:45843 Spain KX869877 KX869891 - Crous et al. 2016
G. australiensis REH9312 Queensland - - MF818180 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. australiensis REH9559 Queensland - - MF818182 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. australiensis REH9492 Queensland - - MF818181 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. australiensis REH9501 Queensland - - MF818183 Davoodian et al. 2018
  • G. austrobrasiliensis

ICN 184400 Brazil MF437000 MF437015 - Magnago et al. 2018
G. austrobrasiliensis ICN 184402 Brazil MF437001 OM068915 - Magnago et al. 2018
G. austrobrasiliensis ICN 184399 Brazil MF436999 MF437014 - Magnago et al. 2018
G. austrocyanescens REH9700 Queensland - - MF818176 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. brunneofloccosus GDGM74550 China ON502904 ON502927 ON100612 This study
G. brunneofloccosus GDGM77131 China ON502907 ON502930 ON100615 This study
G. brunneofloccosus GDGM77125 China ON502906 ON502929 ON100614 This study
G. brunneofloccosus GDGM74638 China ON502905 ON502928 ON100613 This study
G. brunneofloccosus GDGM78301 China ON502908 ON502931 ON100616 This study
G. brunneofloccosus Wu2644a China MW149436 MW151267 MW452611 Huang et al. 2021
G. brunneofloccosus HKAS107735 China MW149436 - - Huang et al. 2021
G. brunneofloccosus OR482 - - - MF818146 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. aff. castaneus CM061 Algeria KP826761 - - Unpublished
G. aff. castaneus E843c - - EU718170 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. cf. castaneus FHMU3368 China MW38086 MW352984 - Xie et al. 2022
G. cf. castaneus HKAS76672 China - KF112478 - Unpublished
G. cf. castaneus iNaturalist 31,940,211 USA MN498109 - - Unpublished
G. castaneus Arora 01 512 - - FJ710209 - Unpublished
G. castaneus FLAS F 61255 USA MH211836 - - Unpublished
G. castaneus SD Russell MycoMap 6269 USA MK532856 - - Unpublished
G. castaneus JMP0028 USA EU819468 - - Unpublished
G. castaneus F:PRL5664MAN USA - GQ166887 - Unpublished
G. castaneus F:PRL5872MAN USA - GQ166884 - Unpublished
G. castaneus F:PRL5948MAN USA - GQ166885 - Unpublished
G. castaneus FLAS F 61844s USA MH212108 - - Unpublished
G. castaneus FLAS F 61497 USA MH211929 - - Unpublished
G. castaneus ND31 USA - - MF818163 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus REH7761 Costa Rica - - MF818162 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus CS1 USA - - MF818169 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus MG531 Italy - - MF818167 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus VDKO979 Belgium - - MF818168 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus MG591 Italy - - MF818189 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus SW73 Pakistan - - MF818184 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus SW33 Pakistan - - MF818164 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus JFA13725 USA     MF818193 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus NY1393558 USA - - MF818187 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus ND59WS USA - - MF818161 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus ND58WS USA - - MF818160 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus JPN12 770 Japan - - MF818190 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus TBG12 712 Japan - - MF818188 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. castaneus NY1782655 Italy - - MF818186 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. aff. cyanescens OKM23719 - EU718104 EU718140 - Unpublished
G. aff. cyanescens REH8819 - - EU718172 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. aff. cyanescens E486 - - EU718173 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. aff. cyanescens E5685 - - EU718174 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. cyanescens 0733 Japan - - MF818191 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. cyanescens AH46009 Spain KY576810 KY576811 - Unpublished
G. cyanescens MCVE28580 Italy KT363684 KT363685 - Vizzini et al. 2015
G. cyanescens 17,184 Italy JF908785 - - Osmundson et al. 2013
G. cyanescens 2837 - KM248948 - - Unpublished
G. cyanescens FLAS F 60581 USA MH016792 - - Unpublished
G. cyanescens FLAS F 61545 USA MH211963 - - Unpublished
G. cyanescens FLAS F 61592 USA MH211984 - - Unpublished
G. cyanescens FLAS F 61205 USA MH211810 - - Unpublished
G. cyanescens MB05-04 - EU718102 - - Unpublished
G. cyanescens NY1782681 Italy - - MF818185 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. cyanescens CNV67 USA MT345244 - - Unpublished
G. cyanescens 0745 Japan - - MF818192 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. cyanescens ND11 USA - - MF818173 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. cyanescens REH9970 USA - - MF818174 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. cyanescens REH8758 - - EU718171 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. cyanescens MG639a Italy - - MF818172 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. cyanescens var. cyanescens NAMA190 USA EU819495 - - Palmer et al. 2008
G. flavocyanescens WXL1182 China MW440550 MW442950 MW452613 Huang et al. 2021
G. flavocyanescens WXL1187 China MW440551 MW442951   Huang et al. 2021
G. flavocyanescens GDGM86062 China - ON505949 ON087646 This study
G. furvescens REH9673 Queensland - - MF818175 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. lacteus MCVE:28582 Italy KT363682 KT363683 - Vizzini et al. 2015
G. atrocyanescens GDGM75894 China ON502909 ON502932 ON087647 This study
G. atrocyanescens GDGM85841 China - ON502934 ON087648 This study
G. atrocyanescens GDGM83673 China - ON502933 - This study
G. atrocyanescens GDGM76540 China - ON502910 - This study
G. longicystidiatus GDGM25857 China   - ON087649 This study
G. longicystidiatus OR74 Thailand - - MF818152 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. longicystidiatus OR394 Thailand - - MF818153 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. longicystidiatus GDGM46175 China ON502912 ON502936 ON087650 This study
G. longicystidiatus GDGM42941 China ON502911 ON502935 ON087652 This study
G. longicystidiatus GDGM52128 China ON502913 ON502937 ON087651 This study
G. longicystidiatus EN99-67 Japan - - MF818151 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. longicystidiatus OR235 China - - MF818202 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. longicystidiatus OR238 China - - MF818155 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. longicystidiatus FHMU1997 China MW380860 MW352983 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus FHMU2234 China - MW352966 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus FHMU3367 China - MW352970 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus FHMU1935 China MW380859 MW352982 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus FHMU900 China MW380852 MW352975 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus FHMU954 China MW380857 MW352980 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus FHMU1582 China MW380845 MW352965 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus FHMU3366 China MW380849 MW352971 - Xie et al. 2022
G. longicystidiatus REH8799 Thailand EU718142 EU718106 MF818147 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. mcnabbii E8155 USA - EF561627 MF818195 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. mcnabbii REH9808 Queensland - - MF818197 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. mcnabbii REH8955 Queensland - - MF818198 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. memnonius GDGM44779 China ON502914 ON502938 ON087653 This study
G. memnonius GDGM78781 China ON502915 ON502939 ON087654 This study
G. memnonius FHMU3369 China MW380858 MW352981 - Xie et al. 2022
G. memnonius FHMU929 China MW380856 MW352979 - Xie et al. 2022
G. naranjus REH9020 Queensland - - MF818158 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. naranjus REH9411 Queensland - - MF818157 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. occidentalis E8164 USA - - MF818194 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. occidentalis REH8821 Australia EU718103 EU718139 MF818177 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. pallidus GDGM46275 China ON502918 ON502942 ON087657 This study
G. pallidus GDGM46401 China ON502920 - ON087659 This study
G. pallidus GDGM46405 China ON502921 ON502944 ON087660 This study
G. pallidus GDGM46509 China - ON505947 ON087663 This study
G. pallidus GDGM46387 China ON502919 ON502943 ON087658 This study
G. pallidus GDGM46419 China ON502922 ON502945 ON087661 This study
G. pallidus GDGM46433 China ON502923 ON502946 ON087662 This study
G. paralongicystidiatus NY48429 Colombia - - MF818148 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. paralongicystidiatus REH8274 Costa Rica - - MF818150 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. paralongicystidiatus REH7725 Costa Rica - - MF818149 Davoodian et al. 2018
  • G. paramjitii

FHMU2243 China MW380847 MW352968 - Xie et al. 2022
  • G. paramjitii

FHMU2240 China MW380846 MW352967 - Xie et al. 2022
  • G. paramjitii

GDGM52188 China ON502917 ON502941 - This study
  • G. paramjitii

CAL KD 162–002 India MF120284 MF120285 - Das et al. 2017
  • G. paramjitii

HKAS63505 China - KF112476 - Wu et al. 2014
G. phaeocyanescens ARB1309 USA - - MF818144 Davoodian et al. 2018
  • G. porphyreus

FHMU917 China MW380854 MW352977 - Xie et al. 2022
  • G. porphyreus

FHMU926 China MW380855 MW352978 - Xie et al. 2022
  • G. porphyreus

FHMU888 China MW380850 MW352973 - Xie et al. 2022
  • G. porphyreus

FHMU2273 China MW380848 MW352969 - Xie et al. 2022
  • G. porphyreus

FHMU905 China MW380853 MW352976 - Xie et al. 2022
  • G. pseudocyanescens

AH55729 Spain KY576808 KY576806 - Unpublished
  • G. pseudocyanescens

AH45840 Spain KY576809 KY576807 - Unpublished
  • G. pseudocyanescens

ECC17070501 Spain MW376657 - - Unpublished
G. pseudolongicystidiatus GDGM42787 China ON502916 ON502940 ON087655 This study
G. pseudolongicystidiatus GDGM42986 China - ON505946 ON087656 This study
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH45850 Spain KX869871 KX869885 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH45849 Spain KX869868 KX869882 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH39364 Spain KX869866 KX869880 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH44522 Spain KX869873 KX869887 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH45812 Spain KX869870 KX869884 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH45848 Spain KX869867 KX869881 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH37878 Spain KX869872 KX869886 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

AH45811 Spain KX869869 KX869883 - Crous et al. 2016
  • G. pseudolacteus

HaI BP16 Spain MT594507 - - Leonardi et al. 2020
  • G. purpurinus

Chpn776 USA KX389110 - - Unpublished
  • G. purpurinus

PRL3737 - EU718105 EU718141 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. robinsonii ND13 USA - - MF818178 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. smithii REH4511 USA - - MF818159 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. smithii ND57 USA - - MF818165 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. smithii MICH232867 USA - - MF818166 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. sp. OR182 Thailand - - MF818156 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. sp. BOS472 BLZ - - MF818196 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. sp. TH9913 CMRN - - MF818170 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. sp. Thoen7634 SEN - - MF818171 Davoodian et al. 2018
G. sp. Arora00 429 - EU718107 EU718143 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. sp. Arora14800 USA MW343686 - - Unpublished
G. sp. E4879c - - FJ710208 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. sp. JLF8835 USA MW343688 - - Unpublished
G. sp. JLF8747 USA MW343687 MW341339 - Unpublished
G. subalbellus OKM25477 USA EU718108 EU718144 - Wilson et al. 2012
G. aff. subalbellus HONDURAS19 USA MT571529 - - Haelewaters et al. 2021
G. subcaerulescens GDGM60494-1 China ON502924 ON502947 ON087665 This study
G. subcaerulescens GDGM60494-2 China - - ON087664 This study
G. subglobosus FHMU3364 China - MW352985 - Xie et al. 2022
G. subglobosus FHMU859 China MW380851 MW352974 - Xie et al. 2022
G. umbrinisquamosus BUF-Both3525 USA - - MF818145 Davoodian et al. 2018
Phlebopus spongiosus CMUB39824 Thailand KX575660 KX575655 - Thongkantha et al. 2021
Ph. spongiosus BC0166 Thailand - MT757956 MT755374 Unpublished

Phylogenetic analyses were performed in the software of PhyloSuite (Zhang et al. 2020). Maximum likelihood phylogenies were inferred using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) under the TPM2u+R3 + F model for 5000 ultrafast bootstraps, as well as the Shimodaira-Hasegawa-like approximate likelihood-ratio test. Bayesian Inference (BI) phylogenies were inferred using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012), the best models for the combined datasets ITS-nrLSU were searched via PartitionFinder 2 (Lanfear et al. 2017), and for atp6 region was searched via ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017). BI analysis using 4 chains were conducted by setting generations to 20 million and stoprul command with the value of stopval set to 0.01, trees were sampled every 1000 generations, the first 25% generations were discarded as burn-ins and posterior probabilities (PP) were then calculated from the posterior distribution of the retained Bayesian trees. The phylogenetic trees were visualised using FigTree v1.4.23.

Results

Molecular phylogeny

In the concatenated (nrLSU + ITS) dataset, 188 sequences (95 for nrLSU and 88 for ITS) from 121 fungal collections were included, including 39 sequences newly generated in this study. The alignment length was 1816 characters including gaps (888 characters for ITS, and 928 characters for nrLSU), TVM + I + G and TIM + I + G were selected for ITS and nrLSU respectively for the BI analysis. In the atp6 dataset, 89 sequences were included, including 23 sequences newly generated in this study. The alignment length was 616 characters. GTR + F + I + G4 was selected as the best models for Bayesian inference. Phlebopus spongiosus Pham & Har. Takah. was selected as outgroup based on recently studies (Davoodian et al. 2018; Xie et al. 2022). The tree topologies obtained by ML and Bayesian analyses were similar; thus, only the ML topology was shown in Figures 1 and 2. Phylogenetic analyses showed that Gyroporus was supported as a monophyletic group, and five new lineages were discovered in present study (Figures 1 and 2). Species of Gyroporus formed four main branches, and four new sections were firstly proposed herein, i.e. “G. sect. Castaneus”, “G. sect. Cyanescens”, “G. sect. Longicystidiatus” and “G. sect. Pallidus”. Gyroporus sect. Castaneus was well-supported as a monophyletic group, and located at the base of the phylogenetic trees. Gyroporus sect. Cyanescens formed an independent branch, but with moderate support in the atp6 tree, and weak support in the ITS-nrLSU tree. Two new species G. atrocyanescens and G. subcaerulescens nested into the sect. Cyanescens. Gyroporus atrocyanescens was well-supported as an independent clade in the phylogenetic trees (Figures 1 and 2), and formed sister relationship with G. flavocyanescens. Gyroporus subcaerulescens formed an independent clade in Figure 1, while clustered together with G. atrocyanescens and G. flavocyanescens in Figure 2. The sect. Longicystidiatus was well-supported in the phylogenetic trees, and three species were included, containing a new species discovered in present study. The sect. Pallidus was well-supported as an independent branch in the trees (Figures 1 and 2), and different from the sect. Castaneus. Two new species G. alboluteus and G. pallidus nested into the branch, and close to “G. cf. castaneus” and G. memnonius.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Gyroporus inferred from the ITS-nrLSU dataset. Bootstrap frequencies (> 50%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP > 0.90) are shown above or below supported branches. New species are indicated in bold.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of Gyroporus inferred from the atp6 dataset. Bootstrap frequencies (> 50%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP > 0.90) are shown above or below supported branches. New species are indicated in bold.

Taxonomy

Gyroporus section Castaneus Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sect. nov.

Fungal Name: FN570996

Type species: Gyroporus castaneus (Bull.) Quél., Enchir. fung. (Paris): 161 (1886)

Etymology: “castaneus” refers to the species in this section similar to G. castaneus.

Basidiomata small to medium-sized. Pileus hemispheric, convex to applanate, dry, subtometosus, yellow-brown, brownish orange, brown, dark brown to red brown, usually with red or purple tinge; context white, unchanging when injured. Hymenophore poroid, white, unchanging when bruised. Stipe central, surface dry, glabrous or subtomentosus, unchanging when handled; basal mycelium white; annulus absent. Basidiospores oval to ellipsoid, thin-walled, smooth. Basidia clavate, thin-walled, 4-spored, hyaline in 5% KOH. Hymenophoral trama composed of thin- to thick-walled hyphae. Cheilocystidia subfusiform or fusiform, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia absent or present. Pileipellis a trichodermium, composed of thin to thick-walled hyphae. Clamp connections frequently present in all tissues.

Notes: Gyroporus sect. Castaneus as a monophyletic branch is strongly supported in our phylogenetic analyses (Figures 1 and 2, BS/BPP = 96%/0.98; BS/BPP = 100%/1). Species in this section are mainly characterised by their brown to yellowish brown pileus, usually with red or purple tinge, white context unchanging when bruised, oval to elliptical basidiospores, and a trichoderm pileipellis composed of clavate to subcylindrical hyphae. Seven species, G. castaneus, G. mcnabbii Davoodian, Bougher & Halling, G. naranjus Davoodian, Bougher, Fechner & Halling, G. paramjitii, G. porphyreus, G. purpurinus Singer ex Davoodian & Halling, and G. subglobosus have been proved to belong to this section based on the morphological features and phylogenetic analyses.

Gyroporus section Cyanescens Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sect. nov.

Fungal Name: FN570997

Type species: Gyroporus cyanescens (Bull.) Quél., Enchir. fung. (Paris): 161 (1886)

Etymology: “cyanescens” refers to the species in this section usually with cyanescent oxidation reactions similar to that of G. cyanescens.

Basidiomata medium to large-sized. Pileus hemispherical to convex, dry, greyish yellow, greyish orange, brown or red-brown, covered with floccose-scaly to coarsely tomentose squamules; context white, becoming bluish, greenish blue or dark blue or deep blue when bruised. Hymenophore poroid, white, yellowish, to greenish-yellow, becoming bluish, greenish blue or dark blue when bruised. Stipe central, dry, covered with tomentose to fibrillose squamules, unchanging or changing to blue when handled; basal mycelium white; annulus indistinct to as a weak annular zone. Basidiospores ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, smooth, yellowish in 5% KOH. Basidia clavate, 4-spored, hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia clavate to subfusiform, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia absent or present. Pileipellis a trichodermium, composed of elongated or somewhat clumped, parallel to slightly interwoven, thin to thick-walled hyphae, colourless or yellowish in 5% KOH. Stipitipellis composed of thin- to thick-walled hyphae, colourless to yellowish. Clamp connections frequently present in all tissues.

Notes: Gyroporus sect. cyanescens formed an independent branch in the phylogenetic trees (Figures 1 and 2), but with moderate support at atp6 tree and weak supported at ITS-nrLSU tree. Morphologically, species in this section all can produce cyanescent oxidation reactions, and pileus surface always covered with elongated and somewhat clumped tomentum. Fourteen species were proved to belong to this section, including two new species G. atrocyanescens and G. subcaerulescens discovered in present study.

Gyroporus atrocyanescens Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sp. nov. Figures 3a–f, 4

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Basidiomata of Gyroporus species. a–f. Gyroporus atrocyanescens (a–b from GDGM75894; c–d from GDGM85841; e–f from GDGM83673). g–h Gyroporus subcaerulescens (GDGM70494).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Microscopic features of Gyroporus atrocyanescens. a. Basidiospores; b. Cheilocystidia; c. Basidia; d. Pileipellis. Bras = 10 μm.

Fungal Name: FN570980

Etymology: “atro-” means black, “cyanescens” means becoming blue, “atrocyanescens” refers to the basidiomata instantly changing to blackish blue when bruised.

Diagnosis: This species is characterised by its white to greyish yellow pileus densely covered with greyish yellow floccose squamules, white to yellowish white hymenophore, broadly elliptical basidiospores (7.5–10 × 4.8–6 μm), and the whole basidiomata immediately staining dull blue, deep blue to dark blue when bruised.

Holotype: CHINA. Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Renhua County, Danxiashan National Natural Reserve, alt. 300 m, 27 September 2018, Xiang-Rong Zhong (GDGM75894).

Basidiomata medium sized. Pileus 4–6 cm broad, sub-hemispherical to convex when young, broadly convex to nearly applanate at maturity, dry, white to yellowish white when young, dull yellow, olive yellow to greyish yellow (3B3–4B3, 3B4–4B4, 3C6) when mature; densely covered with greyish yellow (4B3) appressed scales to floccose squamules; margin incurved and slightly extended, usually cracked at maturity. Context white (1A1), 8–15 mm thick at pileus centre, immediately and intensely staining deep blue (19D8–21D8), blackish blue to dark blue (19F8–21F8) when bruised. Hymenophore adnate to slightly depressed around stipe when mature, 3–5 mm long, white (1A1) when young, yellowish white (3A2) when mature, staining deep blue (19D8–21D8), blackish blue to dark blue (19F8–21F8) when bruised; pores angular to roundish, 3–4 per mm, staining deep blue to dark blue when bruised. Stipe 5–7 × 1.5–2.5 cm, central, sub-cylindrical to clavate, white (2A1) when young, yellowish-white (2A2–4A2) when mature; surface rough, staining dull blue to greyish blue when bruised (22D5–23D5); context white to yellowish white, spongy when young and then hollow in age, staining deep blue to dark blue when bruised. Odour none. Taste mild.

Basidiospores (7.5)8–10(10.5) × (4.5)4.8–6.5(7) µm, [Q = (1.5)1.54–1.7(1.8), Qm = 1.65 ± 0.09], smooth, ellipsoid to somewhat broadly ellipsoid, yellowish in 5% KOH. Basidia 24–35 × 8–10 µm, clavate, 4-spored, hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia 28–40 × 8–12 µm, clavate to subfusiform, thin-walled, vivid yellow in 5% KOH at first, then hyaline. Pleurocystidia not observed. Tube trama composed of 4–10 µm wide parallel hyphae, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH. Pileipellis a cutis, composed of 8–16 µm wide, repent to suberect, parallel to slightly interwoven hyphae, thin-walled, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH; terminal cells 60–130 × 8–14 µm, clavate to subcylindrical, obtuse at apex. Pileal trama made up of hyphae 6–18 μm broad, hyaline in 5% KOH. Stipitipellis composed of thin-walled hyphae, 5–15 μm wide, light yellow in 5% KOH. Stipe trama composed of cylindrical, light yellow in 5% KOH, thin-walled, interwoven hyphae 5–16 μm wide. Clamp connections frequently present in all tissues.

Additional specimens examined: CHINA. Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Renhua County, Danxiashan National Natural Reserve, alt. 300 m, 26 June 2021, Ming Zhang (GDGM85841); same location, alt. 350 m, 24 September 2021, Guo-Rui Zhong (GDGM83673); same location, alt. 330 m, 15 May 2019, Juan-Yan Xu (GDGM76540).

Habitat and distribution: Solitary or scattered on soil in subtropical broad-leaf forest dominated by Fagaceae trees. Currently known only from southern China.

Notes: Phylogenetic analyses showed that G. atrocyanescens was nested into the sect. Cyanescens, and closely related to G. flavocyanescens. However, the latter species, recently reported from southwestern China, differs in its larger basidiomata, dull yellow to greyish-orange pileus, nearly glabrous or somewhat fibrillose to finely tomentose pileal surface, broader basidiospores (8–10 × 5.5–6.5 µm) and hyaline cheilocystidia in 5% KOH (Huang et al. 2021).

In morphology, G. occidentalis Davoodian, Bougher & Halling resembles G. atrocyanescens in the rapidly bluing oxidation reaction. However, G. occidentalis, reported from Western Australia, differs in its larger basidiomata, yellow-white to yellow buff to dirty yellow pileus, and smaller and narrower basidiospores 7.7–8.4(9.1) × 3.5–4.2 µm (Davoodian et al. 2018). The bluing species G. alpinus, G. brunneofloccosus and G. cyanescens are also similar to G. atrocyanescens in the discolouration. However, G. alpinus recently reported from southwestern China, differs in its ivory yellow to brownish-yellow pileus covered with concolourous appressed scaly to floccose squamules, broader basidiospores (5.5–8.5 µm broad), and distribution in alpine forests dominated by Abies, Picea and Quercus (Huang et al. 2021); G. brunneofloccosus, reported from subtropical regions of southern China, differs in its dark brown to light red brown pileus covered with concolourous floccose-scaly to coarsely tomentose squamules, yellowish to greenish-yellow hymenophore staining cerulean blue to greenish-blue when bruised, brownish to light red-brown stipe, and clavate to subfusiform cheilocystidia hyaline in 5% KOH (Li et al. 2003; Huang et al. 2021); while G. cyanescens, originally described from Europe, differs in its larger basidiomata, pale straw, buff to ivory pileus covered with obviously fibrillose tomentum, more robust stipe with a pseudo-annular zone and horizontal fissures at stipe apex, and distribution in forests dominated by Pinus sylvestris or Fagus sylvatia (Watling 1970; Vizzini et al. 2015).

Gyroporus subcaerulescens Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sp. nov. Figures 3g–h, 5

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Microscopic features of Gyroporus subcaerulescens. a. Basidiospores; b. Basidia; c. Cheilocystidia; d. Pileipellis. Bras = 10 μm.

Fungal Name: FN570983

Etymology: “subcaerulescens” means “becoming pale blue or blueish”, refers to the context slightly changing to bluish when exposed.

Diagnosis: This species is characterised by its white to orange white pileus covered with orange white to reddish white coarsely tomentose squamules, white hymenophore and pileus context slowly changing to pastel blue when bruised, elliptical basidiospores (6.5) 8–10 × 5.5–6.5 (7.0) µm.

Holotype: CHINA. Hunan Province, Chenzhou City, Yizhang County, Mangshan National Natural Reserve, alt. 1000 m, 30 July 2017, Hao Huang (GDGM70494).

Basidiomta small to medium sized. Pileus 3–5.8 cm broad, sub-hemispherical to convex when young, broadly convex to nearly applanate at mature, surface dry, white to orange white (5A1, 5A2–6A2), densely covered with orange white to reddish white (5A2–8A2) floccose scales to coarsely tomentose squamules, paler towards margin, margin incurved and slightly extended, usually cracked at age; context white (1A1), slowly staining pale blue to pastel blue (22A4–23A4) when bruised. Hymenophore adnate to slightly depressed around stipe when mature, 5–7 mm long, white (1A1) when young, yellowish white (1A2–2A2) when mature, unchanging when bruised; pores angular to roundish, 2–3 per mm, staining bluish white when bruised. Stipe 4–6 × 1–1.6 cm, sub-cylindrical to clavate, white (2A1) when young, yellowish-white (2A2) to concolourous with pileal surface when mature; surface roughened, unchanging when bruised; context white to cream or yellowish, spongy when young and then hollow in age, unchanging when bruised. Odour none. Taste mild.

Basidiospores (6.5) 8–10 × 5.5–6.5 (7.0) µm, Q = (1.28)1.35–1.64 (1.81), Qm = 1.48 ± 0.13, smooth, elliptical, oval, to somewhat oblong, yellowish in 5% KOH. Basidia 23–32 × 9–14 µm, clavate, 4-spored, hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia 31–45 × 9–15 µm, clavate to subfusiform, thin-walled, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH; Pleurocystidia not observed. Tube trama composed of interwoven hyphae, 5–13 µm wide, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH. Pileipellis a trichoderm, composed of erect, parallel to somewhat clumped hyphae, 8–22 µm wide, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH; terminal cells 55–130 × 8–22 µm, clavate to subcylindrical, with obtuse apex. Pileal trama made up of hyphae 6–20 μm diam, colourless in 5% KOH. Stipitipellis composed of thin-walled hyphae, 5–10 μm wide, light yellow in 5% KOH. Stipe trama composed of cylindrical, light yellow in 5% KOH, thin-walled, interwoven hyphae 5–10 μm wide. Clamp connections frequently present in all tissues.

Habitat and distribution: Solitary or scattered on soil in subtropical mixed forest mainly dominated by Fagaceae trees, with a few pine trees (Cunninghamia sp.). Currently known from Hunan Province, China.

Notes: Phylogenetic analyses shown that G. subcaerulescens was well nested into the sect. Cyanescens, and closely related to G. alpinus, G. cyanescens, G. flavocyanescens and G. atrocyanescens. However, they can be separated from each other by the genetic distance. Additionally, G. alpinus, recently reported from alpine forests of China, differs in its ivory yellow to brownish-yellow pileus densely covered with concolourous appressed floccose squamules, and broader basidiospores (6.5) 7–10 × 5.5–7.5 (8.5) µm (Huang et al. 2021); G. cyanescens, originally reported from Europe, differs in its larger basidiomata can up to 12 cm broad, pale straw pileus, larger but narrow basidiospores (9–11 × 4.5–6 µm) (Watling 1970; Vizzini et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2021); G. flavocyanescens, recently reported from tropical forests of China, differs in its larger basidiomata can up to 10 cm broad, nearly glabrous and flavous to greyish-orange pileus, white context staining strong dark blue when bruised, white to yellowish hymenophore staining cyanine blue to porcelain blue when bruised (Huang et al. 2021); G. atrocyanescens, newly described in this study, can be easily distinguished by its strongly cyanescent oxidation reactions.

In morphology, G. subcaerulescens resembles G. robinsonii with the slowly and faintly bluing oxidation reaction. However, G. robinsonii reported from Western Australia, differs in its yellow-white to dirty buff pileus, large and narrow basidiospores (8.4)8.8–10.5(12) × 4.7–5.6(6) µm (Davoodian et al. 2019). Gyroporus brunneofloccosus, reported from southern China, is also similar to G. subcaerulescens in sharing with the pileus covered with floccose scales to coarsely tomentose squamules, but differs in its larger basidiomata can up to 9 cm broad, darker brown to reddish brown pileus, white context staining cerulean blue to dark blue when bruised, and greenish-yellow hymenophore staining cerulean blue to greenish-blue when bruised (Li et al. 2003; Huang et al. 2021).

Gyroporus section Longicystidiatus Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sect. nov.

Fungal Name: FN570998

Type species: Gyroporus longicystidiatus Nagas. & Hongo, in Nagasawa, Rep. Tottori Mycol. Inst. 39: 18 (2001)

Etymology: “longicystidiatus” refers to the longer cheilo- or pleurocystidia.

Basidiomata medium-sized. Pileus hemispheric to convex, dry, subtomentose or glabrous, greyish orange, brownish orange, yellowish brown, dark brown; context white, unchanging when bruised. Hymenophore poroid, white, yellowish to greenish-yellow, unchanging when bruised. Stipe central, surface dry, glabrous to subtomentose unchanging when handled; basal mycelium white; annulus absent. Basidiospores elliptic, cylindrical to oblong, smooth, thin-walled, yellowish in 5% KOH. Basidia clavate, 4-spored, hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia narrowly fusoid to cylindrical, can up to 100 μm long, thin-walled. Pleurocystidia present or absent. Pileipellis a trichodermium, composed of elongated, interwoven, thin to thick-walled hyphae. Clamp connections frequently present in all tissues.

Notes: Gyroporus sect. Longicystidiatus was well-supported as a monophyletic clade in our phylogenetic analyses (Figures 1 and 2; BS/BPP = 99%/0.98; BS/BPP = 100%/1). Species in this section mainly characterised by their brownish orange to brownish yellow pileus, white context unchanging when bruised, longer cystidia can up to 100 μm, and trichoderm pileipellis. Three species were included in this section, containing a new species described as follow.

Gyroporus pseudolongicystidiatus Ming Zhang, D.C. Xie & T.H. Li sp. nov. Figures 6a–d, 7

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Basidiomata of Gyroporus species. a–d. Gyroporus pseudolongicystidiatus (a–b from GDGM42787; c–b from GDGM42986); e–f. Gyroporus alboluteus (e from GDGM86706; f from GDGM25474); g–h. Gyroporus pallidus (g from GDGM46387; h from GDGM46275).

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Microscopic features of Gyroporus pseudolongicystidiatus. a. Basidiospores; b. Basidia; c. Cheilocystidia. Bras = 10 μm.

Fungal Name: FN570981

Etymology: “pseudolongicystidiatus” refers to the species similar to G. longicystidiatus.

Diagnosis: This species is characterised by its brownish orange to brownish yellow pileus subglabrous when mature, white hymenophore and pileus context unchanging when bruised, and elliptical to cylindrical basidiospores (6.5) 8–10 × 5.5–6.5 (7.0) µm.

Holotype: CHINA. Hainan, Ledong County, Jianfengling National Forest Park, at 18°44′N, 108°52′E, alt. 940 m, 3 July 2013, Ming Zhang (GDGM42787).

Basidiomata small to medium. Pileus 5–10 cm broad, hemispheric, convex to plane, fleshy, surface dry, fibrillose, velvet-subtomentose when young and subglabrous in age, greyish orange (5B6), brownish orange to brownish yellow (5C4–5C8) at first, and gradually changing to light brown, yellowish brown to brown (5D5–5D8, 6D5–6D8) when mature. Context 8–10 mm thick at centre, white, unchanging when exposed to air. Tubes 4–6 mm deep, depressed or nearly free near the stipe in age, whitish, unchanging when cut. Pores 2–3 per mm, circular, white at first, becoming pale yellow (3A3–4A3) in age, unchanging when bruised. Stipe 60–70 × 20–25 mm, central, equal or slightly swollen downwards, brittle, stuffed with a soft pith, becoming hollow or developing several cavities in age, surface dry, coarsely tomentose to floccose-scaly, not reticulate, concolourous with pileus or paler, unchanging when bruised; basal mycelium white; stipe context white, unchanging when exposed. Odour none and taste mild.

Basidiospores (6.5)7–9(9.5) × 3.5–4 μm, Q = (1.77)1.8–2.5(2.57), Qm = 2.01 ± 0.25, elliptic, cylindrical to somewhat oblong, smooth, thin-walled, yellowish to yellowish brown in 5% KOH and yellow brown to dark brown in Melzer’s reagent. Basidia 24–38 × 6–8 μm, 4-sterigmate, clavate, thin-wall, yellowish white to hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia not observed. Cheilocystidia 37–100 × 6–10 μm, abundant and conspicuous, narrowly fusoid to cylindrical, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline. Hymenophoral trama subparallel, smooth or coarse, yellowish white to hyaline in 5% KOH, with hyphae 10–22 μm broad. Pileipellis a trichoderm, consisting of interwoven hyphae 7–10 μm in width, covered with yellowish brown to brown pigment on surface in 5% KOH, dark brown to rusty brown in Melzer’s reagent; terminal cells 30–95 × 7–10 μm, cylindrical or nearly clavate. Pileal trama subregular, composed of branched and interwoven hyphae up to 12–18 μm in width. Stipitipellis hyphae oriented in various directions, subparallel to repent, hyphae 6–15 μm broad, usually covered with yellowish brown to brown pigment in 5% KOH, end cells 30–90 × 6–15 μm, thin walled. Clamp connections present in all tissue.

Additional specimens examined: CHINA. Hainan Province, Ledong County, Jianfengling National Forest Park, at 18°44′N, 108°52′E, alt. 900 m, 4 July 2013, Ming Zhang (GDGM42986).

Habitat and distribution: Solitary or scattered on soil in mixed broadleaf-coniferous forests, mainly dominated by Cyclobalanopsis spp. and Castanopsis spp., alt. 900 m. Currently known from Hainan Province, China.

Notes: The combined morphological characters include the brownish orange to yellowish brown pileus covered with fibrillose or velvet-subtomentose when young and nearly smooth in age, the white context and tubes unchanging when bruised, the hollow and brittle stipe, elliptic to cylindrical basidiospores, and the longer cheilocystidia up to 100 μm; which allowed G. pseudolongicystidiatus to be easily separated from other species of the genus.

Phylogenetically, G. pseudolongicystidiatus is nested into the sect. Longicystidiatus and closely related to G. longicystidiatus and G. paralongicystidiatus. However, G. longicystidiatus, originally described from Japan, differs in the yellow-brown pileus, the presence of the pleurocystidia (38–140 × 12–21 μm), and the broader basidiospores with a smaller Qm value (1.56 ± 0.24) (Nagasawa 2001; Xie et al. 2022); G. paralongicystidiatus Davoodian, recently reported from Costa Rica, differs in its brown to pinkish brown pileus covered with tomentose to finely matted or fine squamules or furfur, broader basidiospores (4.4)5.1–5.7(6.4) µm, and shorter cheilocystidia (17–55 × 6–13 µm)(Davoodian et al. 2018).

Gyroporus section Pallidus Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sect. nov.

Fungal Name: FN570999

Type species: Gyroporus pallidus Ming Zhang & T.H. Li

Etymology: “Pallidus” refers to the pale colour of basidiomata.

Basidiomata small to medium-sized. Pileus convex to applanate, dry, subtomentose, white, yellowish withe, yellowish brown, brownish orange to brown, without red or purple tinge; context white, unchanging when injured. Hymenophore poroid, white, unchanging when bruised. Stipe central, surface dry, glabrous or subtomentosus, concolourous with pileus or paler, unchanging when handled; basal mycelium white; annulus absent. Basidiospores ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoid, smooth, thin-walled, yellowish in 5% KOH. Basidia clavate, 4-spored, hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia clavate to subfusiform, thin-walled, yellowish to hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia not observed. Pileipellis a cutis or trichodermium, composed of interwoven, thin to thick-walled hyphae, colourless or yellowish in 5% KOH. Clamp connections present in all tissues.

Notes: The G. sect. Pallidus was well-supported as an independent branch in the phylogenetic trees (Figures 1 and 2), and four species, G. alboluteus, G. memnonius, G. pallidus and G. subalbellus were included. Of which, G. alboluteus and G. pallidus were newly discovered in the present study, G. memnonius was recently reported from southern China (Xie et al. 2022), and G. subalbellus originally reported in North America (Murrill 1910). In addition, two specimens named as “G. cf. castaneus”, and two unnamed sequences labelled as “OR182” and “BOS472” were also included in this section.

Gyroporus alboluteus Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sp. nov. Figure 6e–f, 8

Figure 8.

Figure 8.

Microscopic features of Gyroporus alboluteus. a. Basidiospores; b. Cheilocystidia; c. Basidia; d. Pileipellis. Bras = 10 μm.

Fungal Name: FN570979

Etymology: “alboluteus” refers to the yellowish white to pale yellow colour of the pileus.

Diagnosis: This species is characterised by its small basidiomata, pale yellow to pale orange pileus, white hymenophore and context unchanging when bruised, elliptical to cylindrical basidiospores (8)8.5–9.5(10) × 4.5–5 μm.

Holotype: CHINA. Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Shixing County, Chabaling National Natural Reserve, alt. 600 m, 15 July 2008, Tai-Hui Li (GDGM25474).

Basidiomata small. Pileus 2–3 cm broad, hemispheric, convex to plane, dry, fibrillose, velvet-subtomentose when young and nearly glabrous in age, white at first, pale yellow to pale orange at maturity, paler towards margin. Context 3–4 mm thick at centre, fleshy, white, unchanging when exposed. Tubes 3–4 mm deep, depressed or nearly free at stipe in age, white, unchanging when bruised. Pores 2–3 per mm, circular, white, unchanging when bruised. Stipe 30–50 × 6–10 mm, central, equal or slightly swollen downwards, brittle, stuffed with a soft pith, becoming hollow or developing several cavities in age, surface dry, glabrous or with white pruina, concolourous with pileus or paler, unchanging when handled, with white basal mycelium; stipe context white, unchanging when exposed. Odour none. Taste mild.

Basidiospores (8)8.5–9.5(10) × 4.5–5 μm, Q = (1.6)1.7–2(2.1), Qm = 1.81 ± 0.13, elliptical, cylindrical to somewhat oblong, smooth, thin-walled, yellowish to yellowish brown in 5% KOH. Basidia 24–35 × 10–13 μm, 4-sterigmate, clavate, thin-wall, yellowish white to hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia not observed. Cheilocystidia 28–40 × 8–15 μm, abundant and conspicuous, narrowly fusoid to cylindrical, smooth, thin-walled, hyaline. Hymenophoral trama subparallel, smooth or coarse, yellowish white to hyaline in 5% KOH, with hyphae 6–10 μm broad. Pileipellis a cutis, consisting of suberect to slightly interwoven hyphae 5–12 μm in width, covered with yellowish brown to brown pigment on surface in 5% KOH, terminal cells 30–95 × 7–10 μm, cylindrical or nearly clavate. Pileal trama subregular, composed of branch, parallel to slightly interwoven hyphae, 5–15 μm in width. Stipitipellis composed of thin-walled hyphae, 5–12 μm wide, light yellow in 5% KOH. Stipe trama composed of cylindrical, light yellow in 5% KOH, thin-walled, interwoven hyphae 5–12 μm wide. Clamp connections frequently present in all tissues.

Additional specimens examined: CHINA, Guangdong Province, Shaoguan City, Shixing County, Chebaling National Natural Reserve, alt. 640 m, 22 June 2014, Ming Zhang (GDGM86706).

Habitat and distribution: Solitary or scattered on soil in mixed forest dominated by Fagaceae trees, and mixed with Pinus massoniana Lamb. Currently known from Guangdong Province, China.

Notes: The combined morphological features of the small basidiomata, the pale yellow to pale orange coloured pileus, the white hymenophore and context unchanging when bruised, and the elliptical to cylindrical basidiospores make G. alboluteus easily distinguished from other species of Gyroporus. Ecologically, G. alboluteus is distributed in subtropical mixed forests, which are dominated by Fagaceae trees and mixed with a small amount of Pinus massoniana.

Phylogentically, G. alboluteus formed an independent clade in the sect. Pallidus, and was related to “G. cf. castaneus”, G. memnonius, G. pallidus and G. subalbellus Murrill, but they can be separated from each other by genetic distance. Besides, “G. cf. castaneus” distributed in northeastern China, differs in its larger basidimata (pileus can up to 10 cm broad), yellow to yellow-brown pileus, yellow-brown to orange-brown stipe, broader basidiospores [(4–)4.5–6(–7) µm], and trichodermium pileipellis (Xie et al. 2022). Gyroporus memnonius, recently described from southern China, differs in its larger basidiomata up to 6 cm broad, dark brown pileus, yellowish brown stipe, and slightly thick-walled basidiospores up to 0.5 µm thick (Xie et al. 2022). Another new species to be described in present paper, G. pallidus, differs in its larger basidiomata, reddish brown to dark brown pileus, and broader basidiospores [8–10 × 5–6 µm, Q = (1.3)1.45–1.81(1.9)]; additionally, G. pallidus was distributed in the southern margin of the temperate zone, and currently only known associated with Castanea mollissima BL. Gyroporus subalbellus, originally reported from North America, differs in its larger basidiomata (pileus up to 12 cm broad), apricot buff, pinkish buff to orange cinnamon pileus, and lager basidiospores measuring 8–14 × 4–6 µm (Murrill 1910; Bessette et al. 2000).

Gyroporus pallidus Ming Zhang & T.H. Li sp. nov. Figure 6g–h, 9

Figure 9.

Figure 9.

Microscopic features of Gyroporus pallidus. a. Cheilocystidia; b. Basidiospores; c. Basidia; d. Pileipellis. Bras = 10 μm.

Fungal Name: FN570982

Etymology: “pallidus” refers to the paler basidiomata colour to compare with G. castaneus.

Diagnosis: This species is characterised by its small basidiomata, brownish orange to light brown pileus usually cracked into small scales on the surface, white to yellowish white context unchanging when bruised, and elliptical basidiospores 8–10 × 5–6 µm.

Holotype: CHINA. Henan Province, Xinyang City, alt. 400 m, 22 July 2016, Ming Zhang (GDGM46387).

Basidiomata small to medium-sized. Pileus 3–5 cm broad, convex when young, then applanate with age; margin decurved at first, then slightly upward when old; surface dry, subtomentose, usually cracking into small scales when mature or in dry conditions, brownish orange, light brown to brown (5C4–5C6, 5D5–6D5); context 3–4 mm thick, white, unchanging in colour when injured. Hymenophore adnate to slightly depressed around stipe when mature, 3–5 mm long, white (1A1) when young, yellowish white (3A2) when mature, unchanging when bruised; pores angular to roundish, 2–3 per mm, white to yellowish white, unchanging when bruised. Stipe 4–6 × 0.6–1.2 cm, central, sub-cylindrical to clavate, concolourous with pileus, slightly paler to yellowish brown to yellowish downward the base; surface roughened, unchanging when bruised; context white to yellowish white, spongy when young and then hollow in age, unchanging when bruised. Odour none. Taste mild.

Basidiospores 8–10 × 5–6 µm, Q = (1.3)1.45–1.81(1.9), Qm = 1.61 ± 0.15, smooth, elliptical, to somewhat broadly elliptical, yellowish in 5% KOH. Basidia 22–33 × 9–12 µm, clavate, 4-spored, hyaline in 5% KOH. Cheilocystidia 28–35 × 9–13 µm, clavate to subfusiform, thin-walled, yellowish white to hyaline in 5% KOH. Pleurocystidia not observed. Tube trama composed of 5–15 µm wide parallel hyphae, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH. Pileipellis a trichoderm, composed of thin-walled, elongated, and slightly interwoven hyphae, 7–22 µm wide, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH; terminal cells 23–100 × 8–22 µm, clavate to subcylindrical, with obtuse apex. Pileal trama made up of hyphae 5–25 μm diam, colourless in 5% KOH. Stipitipellis composed of thin-walled hyphae, 3–8 μm wide, light yellow in 5% KOH. Stipe trama composed of cylindrical, light yellow in 5% KOH, thin-walled, interwoven hyphae 8–23 μm wide. Clamp connections frequently present in all tissues.

Habitat and distribution: Solitary or scattered on soil under Castanea mollissima BL. in subtropical chestnut plantations. Currently only known from Henan Province, China.

Additional specimens examined: CHINA. Henan Province, Xinyang City, Renhua County, alt. 300 m, 22 July 2016, Ming Zhang (GDGM46275, GDGM46509, GDGM46401, GDGM46405); same location, alt. 350 m, 22 July 2016, Xiang-Rong Zhong & Tai-Hui Li (GDGM46419, GDGM46433).

Notes: Phylogenetic analyses shown that the specimens of G. pallidus formed a well supported lineage and nested into the sect. Pallidus. Gyroporus alboluteus and G. memnonius are two closely related species in phylogeny. Indeed, G. memnonius resembles G. pallidus in morphology, but differs in its stronger basidiomata, narrower basidiospores (4–5 μm wide) and smaller basidia 19–26 × 6 μm (Xie et al. 2022). G. alboluteus can be easily distinguished by its pileus colour (see above in G. alboluteus). Besides, two specimens from China named as “G. cf. castaneus” also closely related to G. pallidus. However, the former differs in its lager basidiomata, narrower basidiospores [(4–)4.5–6(–7) μm] with a large Qm value (1.81 ± 0.16), and distributed in the temperate regions of northeastern China (Xie et al. 2022).

Morphologically, G. pallidus resembles G. castaneus, G. paramjitii, G. punctatus Lj.N. Vassiljeva and G. tuberculatosporus. However, G. castaneus, originally reported from Europe, differs in its larger basidiomata (pileus can up to 10 cm broad) and basidiospores [8–12(14) × 4.5–6(7) μm] (Heinemann and Rammeloo 1979; Moser 1983; Castro and Freire 1995); Gyroporus paramjitii, originally described from India, differs in its dark brown to red brown basidiomata, smaller basidia (11–16 × 6 μm), and larger basidiospores (7.5) 8–11.6 (13) × 5–6.6 (7) μm (Das et al. 2017; Xie et al. 2022); Gyroporus punctatus, originally described from the south of Russian Far East, differs in its rugulose to reticulate pileus, rugulose stipe, and larger basidiospores (up to 12 μm long) (Vassiljeva 1950; Nagasawa 2001); G. tuberculatosporus, originally reported from southwestern China, differs in its larger and yellowish brown basidiomata, large and broad basidiospores (9–11.3 × 5–8.7 μm) (Zang 2006).

Two new species G. porphyreus and G. subglobosus recently reported from China, also similar to G. pallidus. However, G. porphyreus differs in its yellow-brown, redbrown to purple pileus, brown to red-brown stipe, and narrower basidiospores (4–5.5 μm wide) with a relatively large Q value (1.4–2.56) (Xie et al. 2022); G. subglobosus differs in its yellowish brown, red-brown to dark brown pileus, brown to red-brown stipe, and subglobose basidiospores (6.5–9.5 × 5–7 μm) with a small Q value (1.1–1.5), besides, G. subglobosus can naturally distributed in northeastern China, and associated with Pinus koraiensis Siebold et Zuccarini, Quercus mongolica Fischer ex Ledebour, or Castanopsis kawakamii Hayata.(Xie et al. 2022). Additionally, G. porphyreus and G. subglobosus nested into the sect. Castaneus, and can be easily distinguished from G. pallidus by the lager genetic distances.

Discussion

In this study, a phylogenetic overview of the genus Gyroporus was carried out on the basis of the combined sequences ITS-nrLSU and atp6 datasets, four new sections within the genus were proposed, i.e. G. sect. Castaneus, G. sect. Cyanescens, G. sect. Longicystidiatus and G. sect. Pallidus, and five new species, G. alboluteus, G. atrocyanescens, G. pseudolongicystidiatus, G. pallidus and G. subcaerulescens, were discovered from China.

In sect. Castaneus, G. castaneus has been widely reported in Europe, North America and eastern Asia. However, the reported collections of “G. castaneus” are actually a complex consisting of several different taxa (Das et al. 2017; Davoodian et al. 2018; Xie et al. 2022); for example, the specimens labelled as “G. castaneus” represent obviously more than one species in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 1). The specimens of this complex from subtropical and tropical regions of Asia or other continents represent different species, such as G. mcnabbii, G. memnonius, G. naranjus, G. paramjitii, G. pallidus etc. It is believed that further studies with more samples will contribute more to reveal the diversity of G. castaneus complex.

The sect. Cyanescens formed a monophyletic group in the phylogenetic tree (Figures 1 and 2), and consisted of species with cyanescent oxidation reactions. Gyroporus atrocyanescens and G. subcaerulescens are well nested into this section, and closely related to the Chinese species G. flavocyanescens, but they can be separated by the morphological features and the genetic distance. In this section, the species from Southern Hemisphere clustered together, while the species from Northern Hemisphere formed two well supported clades in the atp6 phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), which was consistent with the previous study by Davoodian et al. (2018). Gyroporus cyanescens was reported to be widely distributed in China in the past (Bi and Zheng 1990, 1994; Ying and Zang 1994; Mao 2000; Li et al. 2015), and a recently study proved that the distribution of G. cyanescens in China is highly suspectable and specimens fully identical to the European species has not been found yet (Huang et al. 2021). Specimens from temperate regions of China labelled as “G. cyanescens” could be G. alpinus, and specimens from subtropical or tropical regions of China with obvious cyanescent oxidation reactions could be G. brunneofloccosus, G. flavocyanescens or G. atrocyanescens.

The sect. Longicystidiatus was well supported (Figures 1 and 2; BS/BPP = 99%/1; BS/BPP = 100%/1), and formed a sister relationship with the sect. Cyanescens. However, species in this section lack of cyanescent oxidation reaction and can be easily distinguished from other species in Gyroporus by their very large and conspicuous cystidia, especially in G. longicystidiatus and G. pseudolongicystidiatus, the size of cheilocystidia can up to 100 µm in length.

The sect. Pallidus formed a monophyletic clade in the phylogenetic trees (Figures 1 and 2), and four species were included. Species in this section are difficult to distinguish from the species in sect. Castaneus in morphology, but they can be easily separated from each other in phylogeny. Besides, species in sect. Pallidus usually have paler pileus colour, and without red or purple tinge to compare with species in the sect. Castaneus. The species “G. cf. castaneus”, described from China in Xie et al. (2022), has been proved to belong to the sect. Pallidus, and represents a different species from G. castaneus.

As noted in previous studies, species of Gyroporus are widely distributed in China and eastern Asia. Although several new species have been reported, there are still a larger number of unidentified specimens waiting to be studied, and numerous additional hidden species would be revealed based on more collections and DNA molecular evidences in the future.

Key to sections and species of Gyroporus from China

  • 1. Basidiomata not cyanescent …. … . … . … . … . … . 2

    1. Basidiomata cyanescent … … . … . … . … . … . 4 (sect. Cyanescens)

  • 2. Cheilocystidia shorter, usually less than 50 μm long … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . 3

    2. Cheilocystidia longer, some much longer than 50 μm, up to 100 μm long … . … . … . … . … . … . 8 (sect. Longicystidiatus)

  • 3. Pileus without red or purple tinge, white, brown, yellowish brown to dark brown, stipe concolourous with pileus or paler; pileipellis as a cutis or trichoderm … . … . … . … . … . 9 (sect. Pallidus)

    3. Pileus always with more or less red or purple tinge, yellow-brown, orange-brown, brown to red brown, stipe concolourous with pileus or darker, pileipellis trichodermium … … 12 (sect. Castaneus)

  • Section Cyanescens

  • 4. Only hymenophore and pileus context slowly changing to pastel blue when bruised … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … G. subcaerulescens

    4. All parts of basidiomata changing to blue when bruised … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … . 5

  • 5. Pileus and stipe obviously brown, from brownish orange, light brown, light reddish brown to dark brown, with brown floccose-scales and long hairs or villi; context white, turning light turquoise at first, then quickly becoming dark turquise or dark blue when exposed; basidiospores 8.5–10 × 5–6 µm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … . G. brunneofloccosus

    5. Pileus and stipe paler than above, with little or without brown tinge, from white, ivory yellow, greyish-yellow, olive yellow, flavous, grey-yellow to grey-orang; brown floccose-scales and long hairs abscent or much less obvious … … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . 6

  • 6. Basidiomata immediately and intensely turning dark blue to deep blue when bruised; pileus white to greyish yellow, covered with greyish yellow floccose squamules; basidiospores 7.5–10 × 4.8–6 μm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . G. atrocyanescens

    6. Basidiomata gradually becoming blue to dull blue when bruised … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . 7

  • 7. Pileus ivory yellow to grey-orange or brownish-yellow, covered with scaly to floccose squamules; basidiospores 7–10 × 5.5–7.5 µm; basidia long and slender, 35–55 × 7–12 µm; and distributed in alpine forests … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . G. alpinus

    7. Pileus flavous, dull yellow, grey-orange to greyish-orange, nearly glabrous or somewhat fibrillose to finely tomentose; basidiospores 8–10 × 5.5–6.5 µm; and distributed in tropical forests dominated by Fagaceae trees … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . G. flavocyanescens

  • Section Longicystidiatus

  • 8. Cheilocystidia broader, 23–98 × 9–21 μm; pileus 2.7–9 cm broad, subtomentose, drab, yellow-brown to dark yellow-brown; stipe light yellowish brown to brown; basidiospores 7–9 × 3.5–6 μm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . G. longicystidiatus

    8. Cheilocystidia narrower, 37–100 × 6–10 μm; pileus 5–10 cm broad, subglabrous when mature, brownish orange to brownish yellow; basidiospores 8–10 × 5.5–6.5 µm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … G. pseudolongicystidiatus

  • Section Pallidus

  • 9. Pileus white, pale yellow to pale orange, fibrillose or velvet-subtomentose when young and nearly glabrous in age; stipe surface glabrous or with white pruina; basidiospores 8.5–9.5 × 4.5–5 μm; pileipellis a cutis, composed of suberect, interwoven hyphae covered with yellowish brown to brown pigment on surface in 5% KOH; terminal cells 30–95 × 7–10 μm … . … . … . … . … . G. alboluteus

    9. Pileus never white to pale yellow or pale, without yellowish tinge … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … 2

  • 10. Basidiomata larger, pileus up to 10 cm broad, yellow to yellow-brown; basidiospores 8–10 × 4.5–6 μm; distributed in temperate areas … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … . G. cf. castaneus

    10. Basidiomata smaller, pileus less than 10 cm broad … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . 11

  • 11. Pileus 4.8–6 cm broad, dark brown; stipe subtomentose, brown-yellow to yellowbrown; basidiospores 8–10 × 4–5 μm, slightly thick-walled; pleurocystidia 17–40 × 4–10 μm, subfusiform or fusiform; pileipellis a trichoderm, composed of thin to slightly thick-walled hyphae, light yellow in KOH; terminal cells 38–105 × 9–15 μm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … G. memnonius

    11. Pileus 3–5 cm broad, usually cracking into small scales when mature or in dry conditions, brownish orange, light brown to brown; stipe concolourous with pileus, slightly paler to yellowish brown to yellowish downward the base; basidiospores 8–10 × 5–6 µm; pileipellis a trichodermium, composed of thin-walled, elongated, and slightly interwoven hyphae, hyaline to yellowish in 5% KOH; terminal cells 23–100 × 8–22 µm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . G. pallidus

  • Section Castaneus

  • 12. Basidiomata larger, pileus up to 10 cm broad, yellowish brown to reddish brown; basidiospores 9–11.3 × 5–8.7 μm; distributed in tropical forests … . … . … . … . … … G. tuberculatosporus

    12. Basidiomata smaller, pileus less than 10 cm broad … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . 13

  • 13. Basidiospores subglobose to ellipsoid (Qm < 1.5) … … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . G. subglobosus

    13. Basidiospores oval to ellipsoid (Qm > 1.5) … … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . 14

  • 14. Pileus yellow-brown, brown to red-brown when young, then purple; stipe brown, pale to red-brown; basidiospores 7–10.5 × 4–5.5 μm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … … G. porphyreus

    14. Pileus red-brown, orange brown to dark red-brown; stipe red-brown to dark red-brown; basidiospores 7–9 × 5–6 μm … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . … . G. paramjitii

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their efforts and contributions towards this manuscript. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 32070020, 32170010, 31970016), the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (No. 200706176270782), and the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Forestry Bureau (LC-2021124). We thanks are also to the colleagues Juan-Yan Xu, Hao Huang and Xiang-Rong Zhong, and to Wei Zhou (Xinyang Normal University) for their assistance during the field work.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070020,32170010]; Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Forestry Bureau [LC-2021124]; the GDAS’ Project of Science and Technology Development [2020GDASYL-20200104013].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

References

  1. Agerer R. 1999. Gyroporus cyanescens (Bull.: Fr.) Quél. + Pinus sylvestris L. Descriptions of Ectomycorrhizae. 4:43–47. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bessette AE, Roody WC, Bessette AR. 2000. North American Boletes. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bi ZS, Zheng GY. 1990. Macrofungus flora of the mountainous District of North Guangdong. Guangdong: Guangdong Science and Technology Press. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bi ZS, Zheng GY, Li TH. 1994. Macrofungus flora of Guangdong province. Guangdong: Guangdong Science and Technology. [Google Scholar]
  5. Castro ML, Freire L. 1995. Gyroporus ammophilus, a new poisonous bolete from the Iberian peninsula. Persoonia. 16:123–126. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chiu WF. 1948. The Boletes of Yunnan. Mycologia. 40:199–231. doi: 10.1080/00275514.1948.12017700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiu WF. 1957. Atlas of Yunnan boletes. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  8. Crous PW, Wingfeld MJ, Burgess TI, Gestj H, Crane C, Barrett S, Cano-Lira JF, Le Roux JJ, Thangavel R, Guarro J, et al. 2016. Gyroporus pseudolacteus sp. nov. fungal planet 479. Persoonia. 37:246–247. [Google Scholar]
  9. Das K, Chakraborty D, Vizzini A. 2017. Morphological and phylogenetic evidences unveil a novel species of Gyroporus (Gyroporaceae, Boletales) from Indian Himalaya. Nordic Journal of Botany. 35:669–668. doi: 10.1111/njb.01628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davoodian N, Bergemann SE, Hosaka K, Raspé O, Bougher NL, Fechner NA, Henkel TW, Gelardi M, Soytong K, Naseer A, et al. 2018. A global view of Gyroporus: molecular phylogenetics, diversity patterns, and new species. Mycologia. 110:985–995. doi: 10.1080/00275514.2018.1511339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Davoodian N, Bougher NL, Fechner NA, Bergemann SE, Halling RE. 2019. Three new species of Gyroporus (Boletales, Basidiomycota) from Australia. Muelleria. 37:101–107. [Google Scholar]
  12. Haelewaters D, Schoutteten N, Medina van Berkum P, Martin T, Verbeken M, Aime M. 2021. Pioneering a fungal inventory at Cusuco National Park, Honduras. Journal of Mesoamerican Biology. 1:111–131. [Google Scholar]
  13. Heinemann P, Rammeloo J. 1979. Observations sur Gyroporus castaneus s.l. Bull Jard Bot Etat Brux. 49:435–447. doi: 10.2307/3668096. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huang C, Zhang M, Wu XL, Wu G, Xu JP, Yang ZL, Li YC. 2021. Cyanescent Gyroporus (Gyroporaceae, Boletales) from China. MycoKeys. 81:165–183. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.81.65660 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kornerup A, Wanscher JH. 1981. Taschenlexikon der Farben. 3rd ed. Göttingen: Muster-Schmidt Verlag [Google Scholar]
  18. Kretzer AM, Bruns TD. 1999. Use of atp6 in fungal phylogenetics: an example from the Boletales. Mol Phyl Evol. 13:483–492. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lanfear R, Frandsen PB, Wright AM, Senfeld T, Calcott B. 2017. PartitionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol. 34:772–773. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Leonardi M, Furtado A, Furtado M, Comandini O, Geml J, Rinaldi A. 2020. Halimium as an ectomycorrhizal symbiont: new records and an appreciation of known fungal diversity Mycol. Pro. 19:1495–1509. [Google Scholar]
  21. Li TH, Song B. 2003. Bolete species known from China. Guizhou Sci. 21:78–86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Li TH, Deng WQ, Song B. 2003. A new cyanescent species of Gyroporus from China. Fungal Divers. 12:123–127. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li Y, Li TH, Yang ZL, Bau T, Dai YC. 2015. Atlas of Chinese Macrofungal Resources. Zhengzhou (China): Central China Farmers Publishing House. [Google Scholar]
  24. Magnago AC, Alves-Silva G, Neves MA, da Silveira RMB. 2018. A new species of Gyroporus (Gyroporaceae, Boletales) from Atlantic forest in southern Brazil. Nova Hedwigia. 107:291–301. doi: 10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2018/0471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mao XL. 2000. The Macrofungi in China. Zhengzhou: Henan Science and Technology Press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moser MM. 1983. Keys to agarics and boleti. London: Roger Phillips. [Google Scholar]
  27. Murrill WA. 1910. Boletaceae. North American Flora. 9:133–161. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nagasawa E. 2001. Taxonomic studies of Japanese boletes. I. The genera Boletinellus, Gyrodon and Gyroporus. Reports of the Tottori Mycological Institute. 39:1–27. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Osmundson TW, Robert VA, Schoch CL, Baker LJ, Smith A, Robich G, Mizzan L, Garbelotto MM. 2013. Filling gaps in biodiversity knowledge for macrofungi: contributions and assessment of an herbarium collection DNA barcode sequencing project. PlOS One. 8:e62419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Palmer JM, Lindner DL, Volk TJ. 2008. Ectomycorrhizal characterization of an American chestnut (Castanea dentata)-dominated community in Western Wisconsin. Mycorrhiza. 19:27–36. doi: 10.1007/s00572-008-0200-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Raidl S, Scattolin L, Agerer R. 2006. Gyroporus castaneus (Bull.: Fr.) Quél. + Quercus robur L. Descriptions of Ectomycorrhizae. 9:39–44 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 61:539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Singer R, Araujo I, Ivory HM. 1983. The ectotrophically mycorrhizal fungi of the neotropical lowlands, especially Central Amazonia. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia. 77:1–352. [Google Scholar]
  35. Singer R. 1986. The Agaricales in modern taxonomy. 4th ed. Koenigstein (Germany): Koeltz Scientific Books. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 30:2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Tang LP. 2015. Atlas of higher fungi from Lancang River Valley. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press. [Google Scholar]
  38. Thongkantha S, Thongklam S, McKenzie EHC, Lumyong S, Pathom-aree W, Bussaban B. 2021. Diversity and molecular phylogeny of some boletes from three conserved forests in Chiang Mai, with four new records (Chiua viridula, Neoboletus obscureumbrinus, Parvixerocomus pseudoaokii and Xerocomus nigromaculatus) of Thailand. Chiang Mai J Sci. 48:867–883. [Google Scholar]
  39. Vassiljeva LN. 1950. Species novae fungorum. Notulae systematicae esectione cryptogamica instituti botanici nomeine V. L Komarovii Acad Sci USSR. 6:188–200. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol. 172:4238–4246. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vizzini A, Angelini C, Ercole E. 2015. Molecular confirmation of Gyroporus lacteus and typification of Boletus cyanescens. Phytotaxa. 226:27–38. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.226.1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Watling R. 1970. Boletaceae, Gomphidiaceae and Paxillaceae. In: Henderson DM, Orton PD, Watling R, editors. British fungus flora: agarics and boleti. Vol. 1: 45–47. Edinburgh: Royal Botanic Garden; . [Google Scholar]
  43. Watling R. 2006. The sclerodermatoid fungi. Mycoscience. 47:18–24. doi: 10.1007/S10267-005-0267-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Watling R. 2008. A manual and source book of the boletes and their allies. Oslo (Norway): Fungiflora. [Google Scholar]
  45. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, and Taylor J. 1990. Amplifcation and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenies. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, 315–322. New York: Academic Press; doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilson AW, Binder M, Hibbett DS. 2012. Diversity and evolution of ectomycorrhizal host associations in the Sclerodermatineae (Boletales, Basidiomycota). New Phytol. 194:1079–1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04109.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wu XL, Mao XL, Bau T, Song B, Li TH, Zhao YX, Chen SL, Zeng NK, Huang SZ, Wen TC, et al. 2013. Medicinal fungi of China. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wu G, Feng B, Xu JP, Zhu XT, Li YC, Zeng NK, Hosen MI, Yang ZL. 2014. Molecular phylogenetic analyses redefine seven major clades and reveal 22 new generic clades in the fungal family Boletaceae. Fungal Divers. 69:93–115. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xie HJ, Tang LP, Mu M, Fan YG, Jiang S, Su MS, Liang ZQ, Zeng NK. 2022. A contribution to knowledge of Gyroporus (Gyroporaceae, Boletales) in China: three new taxa, two previous species, and one ambiguous taxon. Mycol Progress. 21:71–92. doi: 10.1007/s11557-021-01754-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ying JZ, Zang M. 1994. Economic Macrofungi from South-western China. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zang M. 1986. Notes on the Boletales from eastern Himalayas and adjacent areas of China. Acta Bot Yunnanica. 8:1–22. [Google Scholar]
  52. Zang M, Li B, Xi JX. 1996. Fungi of the Hengduan mountains. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zang M. 2006. Boletaceae I. Flora Fungorum Sinicorum. Vol. 22. Beijing: Science Press. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT. 2020. PhyloSuite: an integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Mol Ecol Resour. 20:348–355. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Mycology are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES