Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Fungal Systematics and Evolution logoLink to Fungal Systematics and Evolution
. 2022 Jan 19;9:11–17. doi: 10.3114/fuse.2022.09.02

Neohygrocybe pseudoingrata, a new grassland species from Slovakia and the Czech Republic

F Fuljer 1, M Zajac 2, D Boertmann 3, D Szabóová 4, I Kautmanová 4,*
PMCID: PMC9355102  PMID: 35978984

Abstract

Neohygrocybe pseudoingrata, a new waxcap species known from Slovakia and the Czech Republic, is characterised by its pale greyish coloured and often robust basidiomata (or sporocarps), nitrous smell, context without colour changes, hollow, contorted and compressed stipe and smooth or slightly fibrillose pileus surface. Based on morphology and DNA analysis of ITS and LSU sequences of the collected specimens, N. pseudoingrata belongs to Neohygrocybe sect. Neohygrocybe together with N. ovina, N. nitrata and N. ingrata. Collections of N. pseudoingrata form a well-supported clade in phylogenetic trees.

Citation: Fuljer F, Zajac M, Boertmann D, Szabóová D, Kautmanová I (2022). Neohygrocybe pseudoingrata, a new grassland species from Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 9: 11–17. doi: 10.3114/fuse.2022.09.02

Keywords: Agaricomycetes, grasslands, Hygrophoraceae, meadows, new taxon, Waxcaps

INTRODUCTION

The genus Hygrocybe as delimited in Boertman (2010) has been split into a number of genera (Chromosera, Cuphophyllus, Gliophorus, Gloioxanthomyces, Hygrocybe, Neohygrocybe and Porpolomopsis) by Lodge et al. (2013). Neohygrocybe differs from most Humidicutis, Porpolomopsis and Gliophorus species in lacking bright pigments. Lodge et al. (2013) described Neohygrocybe as having swollen, and stuffed stipes that become hollow; pileus 2–6 cm, hemispherical, becoming umbonate, smooth to scaly, margin becoming fissured, brick colour to fuscous cinereous; lamellae few, sublunate, uncinate, broad, venose, white at first, becoming cinereous.

Members of the genus Hygrocybe s. l. (Hygrocybe, Neohygrocybe, Gliophorus, Porpolomopsis) and Cuphophyllus fall into distinct clades but they usually occur together and are often treated as one group for conservation purposes (e.g., Boertmann 2010). Most of these genera occur in “unimproved”, mowed or grazed grasslands in Europe, where they figure as good indicators of conservation value of semi-natural and natural grasslands (Adamčík & Kautmanová 2005, Boertmann 2010, Fuljer et al. 2020). These grasslands are usually characterised by very low levels of dissolved nitrate and phosphate (Ejrnæs & Brunn 1995). Hygrocybe s. l. species, together with a Clavariaceae, Entoloma and Geoglossaceae, form a so called “CHEG” group, by reason of sharing ecological similarities (Rotheroe 2001). However, waxcaps can also produce basidiomata in habitats such as peat bogs, sand dunes and woodlands (Cantrell & Lodge 2000, Griffith et al. 2004, Boertmann 2010) and in North America and the tropics they are mainly found in forests (e.g. Hesler & Smith 1963, Pegler & Fiard 1978, Læssøe & Boertmann 2008).

The ecological role of waxcaps is still unclear, despite intensive research in this field. Griffith et al. (2004) referred to the fact that some of the waxcaps can occur in the grasslands together with mosses and this connection was also noticed by Boertmann (2010). However, their biology remains a mystery since isotopic signatures indicate that they are neither mycorrhizal nor saprotrophic (Seitzman et al. 2011, Halbwachs et al. 2013). Recent studies revealed that some of the waxcaps can be associated with plant roots and they probably have a biotrophic lifestyle with plants (Halbwachs et al. 2013, 2018). Tello et al. (2013) proved that at least one species, Hygrocybe virginea, is a maternally transmitted endophytic fungus associated with Plantago lanceolata.

In this report we describe a taxon new to science found in central European grasslands. It is also likely to have a wider distribution.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Collections and morphological analyses

Waxcaps were collected in Slovakia and the Czech Republic during 2014–2020, from July to October, at 23 localities by F. Fuljer, M. Zajac and M. Mička. Most of the collections were from the Javorníky Mts. (northwestern part of Slovakia) and the rest were from Biele Karpaty, Jablunkovské medzihorie, Kysucká vrchovina, Turzovská vrchovina (Slovakia) and Českotřebovská vrchovina (Czech Republic) mountains. Soil type has been determined based on the geological map of Slovakia (http://apl.geology.sk/gm50js).

Descriptions of macro-morphological features were based on fresh material. Colours were coded according to the Pantone colour chart (Pantone Colour Finder 2021). Twenty basidiomata were studied and measured from the holotype collection.

The micromorphology of the studied specimens was investigated by F. Fuljer, D. Boertmann and I. Kautmanová using a Kapa Mic D117 with integrated camera, a Leica SM-Lux, a DIC microscope Nikon Eclipse Ni-U and microphotography were captured by a Nikon DS-Ri2 camera. NIS-Elements Basic Research and MiCam v. 2.4 imaging software were used to measure and examine microscopic features. Tissues, spores and other micro-morphological structures were examined fresh or rehydrated in H2O or in Congo Red ammonia solution. Altogether 575 spores from 14 basidiomata were studied and measured; spores were measured mainly from spore deposits in H2O. Fifty basidia, 50 sterigmata and 50 basidioles from five basidiomata were investigated from the rehydrated material in ammonial Congo Red solution. Other microscopic structures, such as gill trama, pileipellis and stipitipellis, were observed in three basidiomata from the holotype. Q value refers to the division of length and width of microscopic structures. Qav refers the average value of Q and av. refers the average length and width of microscopic features.

Type material was deposited in the herbarium of the Slovak National Museum-Natural History Museum, Bratislava (BRA). Nomenclature follows Lodge et al. (2013) and Index Fungorum (indexfungorum.org).

DNA extraction, amplification, sequencing

Total genomic DNA was extracted from dried tissue using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, but with prolonged incubation time of up to 3 h after addition of the RNA-lytic enzyme. PCR was performed using a BioRad C1000 Touch™ Thermal Cycler. Target region of the internal transcribed spacer regions of ribosomal DNA (ITS) was amplified using primers ITS5 (5’-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3’) and ITS4 (5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’; White et al. 1990). The large ribosomal subunit of ribosomal DNA (LSU) was amplified using primers LR0R (5’-ACCCGCTGAACTTAAGC-3’) and LR5 (5’-TCCTGAGGGAAACTTCG-3’; Vilgalys & Hester 1990). The amplification reactions were conducted in 25 μL total volume using a GoTaq Flexi PCR kit (Promega), the reaction mixture containing 20–25 ng total DNA template, 1 μL of both primers (10 μM), 5 μL of Buffer (5×), 2.5 μL of dNTP (2 mM), 2 μL of MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.2 μL GoTaq Flexi polymerase (5 U) and the final volume was added with ultra pure water. The amplification reaction for ITS and LSU regions was set up as follows: 3 min initial denaturation at 95 °C, 32 cycles (95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min + increasing time 2 s per cycle), 10 min final elongation at 72 °C. The PCR products were analysed on 2 % agarose gel. PCR products were purified using a Thermosensitive Alkaline Phosphatase (FastAP) and Exonuclease 1 (Exo 1) (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The partial gene was sequenced in a commercial laboratory (Eurofins Genomics GmbH, Cologne, Germany). Sequences were visualised, edited and aligned in MEGA-X (Kumar et al. 2018). Sequence similarity searches were performed using GenBank BLASTn (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/) and BOLD Identification System (https://www.boldsystems.org/).

Phylogenetic analysis

DNA sequences of Neohygrocybe species and selected outgroup of Cuphophyllus fornicatus were downloaded from NCBI on 21 Jan. 2021. All sequences retrieved in this study were sent to BOLD database and transferred to GenBank and accession numbers are listed in Table 1. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X (Kumar et al. 2018) by using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura-Nei model (Tamura & Nei 1993). The tree with the highest log likelihood (-3667.62) is shown (Fig. 1). The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Joining and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pair wise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. This analysis involved 26 ITS sequences. There were a total of 782 positions in the final dataset. In the tree, Neohygrocybe species were positioned on a separate branch close to the clade of N. nitrata, which is consistent with the results from macro- and microcharacters observations.

Table 1.

Collections studied and analysed in this study by molecular methods with collection numbers, country of origin, GenBank and BOLD accession numbers (some collections of N. pseudoingrata were not sequenced, for all collections check Additional materials examined).

Species Herbarium number Origin ITS GenBank Accession No. ITS BOLD Accession No.
N. ingrata BRA CR34493 Slovakia MZ479336 NEOHY 008-21
BRA CR34490 Slovakia MZ479339 NEOHY 019-21
BRA CR34489 Slovakia MZ479337 NEOHY 025-21
BRA CR34488 Slovakia MZ479338 NEOHY 026-21
N. nitrata BRA CR34492 Czechia MZ479340 NEOHY 009-21
N. ovina BRA CR34491 Slovakia MZ479341 NEOHY 010-21
BRA CR34487 Slovakia MZ479342 NEOHY 027-21
N. pseudoingrata sp. nov. BRA CR33023 holotype Slovakia MZ479356 NEOHY 001-21
BRA CR34363 Slovakia MZ479355 NEOHY 002-21
BRA CR34377 Slovakia MZ479354 NEOHY 003-21
BRA CR34369 Slovakia MZ479353 NEOHY 004-21
BRA CR34368 Slovakia MZ479352 NEOHY 005-21
BRA CR34367 Slovakia MZ479351 NEOHY 006-21
BRA CR34364 Slovakia MZ479350 NEOHY 007-21
BRA CR34374 Slovakia MZ479349 NEOHY 011-21
BRA CR34373 Slovakia MZ479348 NEOHY 012-21
BRA CR34362 Slovakia MZ479347 NEOHY 013-21
BRA CR34371 Slovakia MZ479346 NEOHY 014-21
BRA CR34511 Slovakia MZ479345 NEOHY 015-21
BRA CR34382 Slovakia MZ479344 NEOHY 016-21
BRA CR34365 Slovakia MZ479343 NEOHY 017-21
BRA CR34372 Slovakia MZ479362 NEOHY 018-21
BRA CR34502 Slovakia MZ479361 NEOHY 020-21
BRA CR34378 Slovakia MZ479360 NEOHY 021-21
BRA CR34384 Slovakia MZ479359 NEOHY 022-21
BRA CR34383 Slovakia MZ479358 NEOHY 023-21
BRA CR34370 Slovakia MZ479357 NEOHY 024-21
Open in a new tab

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Maximum likelihood tree obtained from the analysis of ITS sequences of Neohygrocybe and Cuphophyllus fornicatus as outgroup. Bootstrap support values are indicated at the nodes.

RESULTS

Taxonomy

Neohygrocybe pseudoingrata Fuljer, Zajac, Boertm. & Kautmanova, sp. nov. MycoBank MB 842316. Figs 2, 3.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Macromorphological characters of Neohygrocybe pseudoingrata. A. Basidiomata in the natural habitat, where the holotype was collected (BRA CR33023, holotype). B. Different shapes of basidiomata (PHFF11143, paratype). C. The robust stature of N. pseudoingrata in the natural habitat (PHFF11554, paratype). D. Basidiomata in the natural habitat (PHFF10723, paratype). E. Basidioma with brownish pileus, in the natural habitat (PMZ554, paratype). F. Basidioma with greyish pileus, in the natural habitat (PHFF11080, paratype). G. Cross-section of the well-grown basidioma, hollow stipe and adnexed lamellae visible (BRA CR33023, holotype). H. Closer, ventral view on the compressed stipes and lamellae (BRA CR33023, holotype). I. Closer view showing the colour, shape and smooth surface of the pileus (BRA CR33023, holotype). Scale bars = 20 mm.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

Neohygrocybe pseudoingrata (BRA CR33023, holotype). A. Basidiospores. B. Pileipellis. Scale bars: A = 10 μm; B = 20 μm.

Etymology: Name refers to Neohygrocybe ingrata, a species with similar morphology.

Typus: Slovakia, Javorníky Mts., Melocík, Vel’ké Rovné, ca. 300 m E from the main road, N49°20’28.14” E18°30’37.65”, alt. 798 m, cow grazed and mowed grassland, 21 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (holotype BRA CR33023, ITS GenBank MZ479356, LSU GenBank MZ479363, ITS BOLD NEOHY001-21).

Habitat & Distribution: Known from Slovakia and the Czech Republic, probably more widespread but possibly misidentified as N. ingrata or N. nitrata. Growing gregarious and very often caespitose and may also sporulate in half rings, sometimes solitary or scattered. It has been recorded in different vegetation types, but always in unimproved semi-natural mesic meadows and pastures, from July to October, on acidic, neutral and calcareous soils.

Pileus 20–80 mm, at first hemispherical, later convex to applanate, irregular, often irregularly contorted, sometimes umbonate, or centrally compressed and with splitting margin; surface smooth, or radially fibrillose, dry, when old very often uneven, buff brown, pale brownish, greyish brown, dark brownish grey (Pantone 463C to Pantone 466C). Stipe 35–100 × 8–32 mm, fusiform, clavate; irregularly furrowed, compressed, often contorted and tawn; hollow; surface smooth, dry, white with slightly greyish or brownish tinges (Pantone 4246C to Pantone 4247C). Lamellae adnexed, often very broad and thick, ventricose, brittle, white with brownish or greyish hue, much paler than pileus, slightly paler than stipe (Pantone P 1-9 C, Pantone 7527C) , sometimes with paler edges. Context not reddening (without any colour changes), white, white with brownish hue, especially in cap (in stipe Pantone 7527C, in pileus Pantone 4645C, Pantone 4655C or Pantone 4665C); rather fragile, fibrillose. Smell unpleasant, significantly nitrous. Taste neutral, sometimes farinaceous. Spore deposit white. Basidiospores broadly ellipsoid, ellipsoid to ellipsoid-oblong, thin-walled, smooth, hyaline, non-amyloid, sometimes with one big vacuole, (6.5–)7.2–10.2(–11.8) × (4.4–)4.7–6.4(–7.5) μm, av. = 8.4 × 5.5 μm, Q = (1.1–)1.3–1.8(–2.1), Qav. = 1.56 (575 spores from 14 basidiomata measured from the type collections). Basidia (33.5–)35–51(–55) × (5.5–)6.8–9.5(–11.3) μm, av. = 42 × 8 μm (50 basidia from five basidiomata measured from the holotype), predominantly 4-spored, narrowly clavate to clavate, sterigmata (2.5–)2.7–6.6(–6.9) μm (50 sterigmata from five basidiomata measured from the holotype), awl-shaped. Basidioles (30.5–)33–46(–49) × (5.4–)5.9–8.7(–10.1) μm (50 basidioles from five basidiomata measured from the holotype), clavate to broadly clavate. Cystidia absent. Pileipellis a cutis with cells 28–146 × 3.5–15 μm. Stipitipellis a cutis with some free hyphal ends (resembling a thrichoderm) with cells 25–160 × 3.9–17 μm, cells below pileipellis with brownish content. Gill trama subregular with cells 30–155 × 4–26.5 μm (some up to 400 μm), ± cylindrical, vermiform and sometimes with slightly inflated ends, long slender cells in centre and shorter cells to the sides. Clamps abundant in all tissues.

Additional materials examined: Czech Republic, Českotřebovská vrchovina Mts., Česká Třebová, alt. 475 m, mesic mowed meadow, 27 Jul. 2020, M. Mička (BRA CR34358). Slovakia, Javorníky Mts., Tomborov Salaš, Pšurnovice (Bytča), N49°14’2.85” E18°31’59.94”, alt. 384 m, cow grazed and mowed meadow, 4 Oct. 2014, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34502); Melocík, Vel’ké Rovné, N49°20’33.42” E18°30’31.18”, alt. 791 m, small overgrown meadow hidden in the forest, 29 Aug. 2019, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34375); Dučkov, Vysoká nad Kysucou, N49°21’38.56” E18°31’51.30”, alt. 722 m, mesic mowed meadow, 31 Aug. 2018, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34374); Škápová, Petrovice, N49°14’54.65” E18°31’47.48”, alt. 458 m, mesic mowed meadow, 1 September 2019, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34370); under the Holý vrch, Hvozdnica, N49°12’46.52” E18°27’0.67”, alt. 547 m, mesic mowed meadow on calcareous soils, 19 Sep. 2019, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34377); Škápová, Petrovice, N49°15’2.01” E18°31’52.58”, alt. 426 m, mesic mowed meadow, 2 Oct. 2019, F. Fuljer & M. Zajac (BRA CR34376); under the Medvedie hill, Petrovice, N49°15’46.82” E18°31’1.80”, alt. 422 m, mesic overgrown meadow, 2 Oct. 2019, F. Fuljer & M. Zajac (BRA CR34372); Benková, Petrovice, N49°16’4.53” E18°30’52.90”, alt. 451 m, mesic mowed meadow, 2 Oct. 2019, F. Fuljer & M. Zajac (BRA CR34371); Medvedie, Petrovice, N49°15’53.80” E18°30’57.08”, alt. 444 m, overgrown part of mesic meadow, 27 Oct. 2019, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34370); Baránkovci, Štiavnik, N49°16’50.71” E18°25’12.50”, alt. 692 m, cow grazed pasture, 8 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34363); Benková, Petrovice, N49°16’2.26” E18°30’47.03”, alt. 477 m, mesic mowed meadow, 13 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34369); Setechov, Petrovice, N49°16’7.00” E18°29’46.72”, alt. 560 m, overgrown meadow, 16 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34368); Vrchrieka, Vysoká nad Kysucou, N49°21’41.23” E18°33’3.74”, alt. 790 m, mesic mowed meadow, 22 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34367); Kržel’, Papradno, N49°17’40.49” E18°20’15.30”, alt. 772 m, overgrown complex of meadows, 24 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34366); Čiakov, Kolárovice, N49°19’27.38” E18°31’25.04”, alt. 674 m, overgrown meadow, 25 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34365); Tomborov Salaš, Pšurnovice (Bytča), N49°14’0.45” E18°31’57.01”, alt. 373 m, cow grazed meadow, 25 Jul. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34364); Brezie, Petrovice, N49°15’41.07” E18°30’57.63”, alt. 456 m, mowed meadow, 12 Sep. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34355); Zákysučie, Krásno nad Kysucou, N49°22’44.18” E18°48’59.35”, alt. 559 m, overgrowing mesic heathland, 10 Oct. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34356); Medvedie 2, Petrovice, N49°15’46.45” E18°30’51.77”, alt. 466 m, small sized overgrown meadow, 26 Oct. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34357); Jablunkovské medzihorie Mts., Pol’ana, Skalité, N49°30’16.3” E18°55’32.9”alt. 730 m, mesophilic mowed meadow, 25 Jul. 2020, M. Zajac (BRA CR34381); Turzovská vrchovina Mts., Boháčovci, Korňa, N49°26’33.33” E18°31’49.19”, alt. 714 m, mesic mowed meadow, 8 Sep. 2019, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34362); Ďurajčíkovci, Korňa, N49°25’46.13” E18°31’4.40”, alt. 698 m, mesic mowed meadow, 8 Sep. 2019, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34379); Hlavice – Flintovci, Klokočov, N49°27’52.4” E18°36’33.2”, alt. 720 m, mesic mowed meadow, 10 Sep. 2019, M. Zajac (BRA CR34382); Kysucká vrchovina Mts., Tatarovci – Senkov, Povina, N49°18’08.7” E18°43’52.7”, alt. 633 m, mesic mowed meadow, 11 Sep. 2019, Z. Václavová (BRA CR34384); Harvelka, Nová Bystrica, N49°21’27.10” E19°8’50.17”, alt. 808 m, sheep grazed pasture, 25 Sep. 2019, F. Fuljer & M. Zajac (BRA CR34378); Harvelka, Nová Bystrica, N49°21’25.21” E19°8’4.39”, alt. 783 m, sheep grazed pasture, 17 Sep. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34359); Brodenec, Snežnica, N49°15’42.87” E18°47’4.41”, alt. 459 m, mesic mowed meadow, 7 Oct. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34360); Kysucké Beskydy Mts., Serafinov vlek, Skalité, N49°29’39.1” E18°57’48.8”, alt. 725 m, mesic mowed meadow, 28 Sep. 2019, M. Zajac (BRA CR34383); Biele Karpaty Mts., Kopánka, Horné Orechové, N48°55’31.31” E18°1’59.62”, alt. 261 m, cow grazed pasture, 20 Oct. 2020, F. Fuljer (BRA CR34361).

DISCUSSION

Due to the dull colouration of the basidiomata and dry surfaces of stipe and pileus, this new waxcap clearly belongs to the genus Neohygrocybe, as has been confirmed also by the phylogenetic analysis. It is a well recognisable species, characterised by robust dull coloured basidiomata, nitrous smell, non-reddening context, pale brownish and greyish, smooth or finely fibrillose pileus, slightly greyish or brownish, contorted, compressed and hollow stipe and broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid spores (Fig. 2, 3). Closely related species are N. ingrata, N. nitrata and N. ovina. The most similar species is N. ingrata, in which the context stains reddish. Young basiomata of N. pseudoingrata and N. ingrata can be very similar, distinguished only by the reddening context of N. ingrata. Neohygrocybe nitrata also has a nitrous smell and also lacks the reddish reaction of the context, but it is usually smaller (up to 60–70 mm high), with a more or less squamulose dark brown pileus and thinner stipe (up to 6 mm diam) which is also dark brown. Neohygrocybe ovina is much darker, with dark brown, dark grey or almost black stipe, pileus and lamellae and the context is strongly reddening, and the cap may be squamulose. Several other Neohygrocybe-taxa have been described from North and Central America, Australia, New Zealand and China (many not yet combined into the genus) such as Hygrocybe lepidopellis, H. cinerascens, H. mellita, H. albomarginata, H. caespitosa, H. melleofusca, H. ovinoides, H. fuligineosquamosa, H. waolipo, Neohygrocybe griseonigra, N. innata, N. subovina, and N. squarrosa (Hesler & Smith 1963, Pegler 1983, Horak 1990, Desjardin & Hemmes 1997, Cantrell & Lodge 2004, Young 2005, Bessette et al. 2012, Wang et al. 2018). None of these have been sequenced, but all differ from N. pseudoingrata in darker colouration, spore morphology, structure of pileus surface or colour changes. Cuphophyllus species differ by deeply decurrent lamellae; C. fornicatus is the single species of the genus that lacks decurrent lamellae and strongly resembles N. pseudoingrata but for the nitrous smell. Dull coloured Gliophorus species differ by lubricous cap and stipe surfaces. Pseudotricholoma metapodium is characterised by amyloid spores, solid, non-compressed stipe and lamellae that are not veined.

The indicator value for valuable grasslands of N. pseudoingrata is uncertain. Recorded collections from Slovakia and the Czech Republic are from mowed meadows or extensively grazed pastures and were accompanied by various CHEG fungi. Further research will reveal whether the species is rare or only overlooked and misinterpreted. Based on the numerous collections from NW Slovakia it can be assumed that N. pseudoingrata is probably common in Slovakia and should be searched for in neighbouring countries.

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly thank M. Cechová, M. Kudrna, M. Mička, V. Rochová and Z. Václavová for their field assistance and collections. V. Kautman is acknowledged for help with macromorphology documentation. Research was funded by Operational Program of Integrated Infrastructure, co-financed with the European Fund for Regional Development (EFRD) ITMS2014+313021W683: “DNA barcoding of Slovakia (SK-BOL), as a part of international initiative International Barcode of Life (iBOL)”.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Adamčík S, Kautmanová I. (2005). Hygrocybe species as indicators of natural value of grasslands in Slovakia. Catathelasma 6: 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bessette AE, Roody WC, Sturgeon WE, et al. (2012). Waxcap Mushrooms of Eastern North America. Syracuse University Press. [Google Scholar]
  3. Boertmann D. (2010). The genus Hygrocybe. 2nd revised edition. Svampetryk, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cantrell SA, Lodge DJ. (2000). Hygrophoraceae of the Greater Antilles: Hygrocybe subgenus Hygrocybe. Mycological Research 104: 873–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cantrell S, Lodge DJ. (2004). Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales) of the Greater Antilles: Hygrocybe subgenus Pseudohygrocybe sections Coccineae and Neohygrocybe. Mycological Research 108: 1301–1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Desjardin DE, Hemmes DE. (1997). Agaricales of the Hawaiian Islands. 4. Hygrophoraceae. Mycologia 89: 615–638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ejrnæs R, Brunn HH. (1995). Predictions of grassland quality for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 41: 171–183. [Google Scholar]
  8. Fuljer F, Zajac M, Václavová Z, et al. (2020). Hygrocybe (genera Hygrocybe, Gliophorus, Porpolomopsis and Cuphophyllus) in northwestern Slovakia, Part III. Catathelasma 20: 5–55. [Google Scholar]
  9. Geologická mapa Slovenska M 1:50 000 [online]. Bratislava: Štátny geologický ústav Dionýza Štúra, 2013. Available online on: http://apl.geology.sk/gm50js [last accessed 9 February 2021]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Griffith GW, Bratton JL, Easton GL. (2004). Charismatic megafungi – the conservation of waxcap grasslands. British Wildlife 15: 31–45. [Google Scholar]
  11. Halbwachs H, Dentinger BTM, Detheridge AP, et al. (2013). Hyphae of waxcap fungi colonise plant roots. Fungal Ecology 6: 487–492. [Google Scholar]
  12. Halbwachs H, Easton GL, Bol R, et al. (2018). Isotopic evidence of biotrophy and unusual nitrogen nutrition in soil-dwelling Hygrophoraceae. Environmental Microbiology 20: 3573–3588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hesler LR, Smith AH. (1963). North American species of Hygrophorus. The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville. [Google Scholar]
  14. Horak E. (1990). Monograph of the New Zealand Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales). New Zealand Journal of Botany 28: 255–309. [Google Scholar]
  15. Læssøe T, Boertmann D. (2008). A new alamellate Hygrocybe species from Ecuador. Mycological Research 112: 1206–1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kimura M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16: 111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, et al. (2018). MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lodge DJ, Padamsee M, Matheny PB, et al. (2013). Molecular phylogeny, morphology, pigment chemistry and ecology in Hygrophoraceae (Agaricales). Fungal Diversity 64: 1–99. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pantone Colour Finder: https://www.pantone.com/color-finder#/pick?pantoneBook=pantoneSolidCoatedV3M2 [last accessed 9 February 2021]. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pegler DN. (1983). Agaric flora of the Lesser Antilles. Kew Bulletin Additional Series IX: 1–668. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pegler DN, Fiard JP. (1978). Hygrocybe sect. Firmae (Agaricales) in tropical America. Kew Bulletin 32: 297–312. [Google Scholar]
  22. Rotheroe M. (2001). A preliminary survey of waxcap grasslands indicator species in South Wales. In: Fungal Conservation: Issues and Solutions (Moore D, Nauta NN, Evans SE, et al. eds). Cambridge University Press, UK: 120–135. [Google Scholar]
  23. Seitzman BH, Ouimette A, Mixon RL, et al. (2011) Conservation of biotrophy in Hygrophoraceae inferred from combined stable isotope and phylogenetic analyses. Mycologia 103: 280–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tamura K, Nei M. (1993). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 512–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tello SA, Silva-Flores P, Agerer R, et al. (2013). Hygrocybe virginea is a systematic endophyte of Plantago lanceolata. Mycological Progress 13: 471–475. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vilgalys R, Hester M. (1990). Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4239–4246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang C-Q, Zhang M, Li T-H. (2018). Neohygrocybe griseonigra (Hygrophoraceae, Agaricales), a new species from subtropical China. Phytotaxa 350: 64–70. [Google Scholar]
  28. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee SB, et al. (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, et al. eds.). Academic Press, New York: 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  29. Young AM. (2005). Fungi of Australia. Hygrophoraceae. ABRS, Canberra; CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Fungal Systematics and Evolution are provided here courtesy of Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute

RESOURCES