Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2022 Feb 25;17(3):503–508. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.1c00707

A chemical method to sequence 5-formylcytosine on RNA

Ang Li 1, Xuemeng Sun 1, A Emilia Arguello 1, Ralph E Kleiner 1,*
PMCID: PMC9357364  NIHMSID: NIHMS1827724  PMID: 35212224

Abstract

Epitranscriptomic RNA modifications can regulate biological processes, but there remains a major gap in our ability to identify and measure individual modifications at nucleotide resolution. Here we present Mal-Seq, a chemical method to sequence 5-formylcytosine (f5C) modifications on RNA based upon selective and efficient malononitrile-mediated labeling of f5C residues to generate adducts that are read as C-to-T mutations upon reverse transcription and PCR amplification. We apply Mal-Seq to characterize the prevalence of f5C at the wobble position of mt-tRNA(Met) in different organisms and tissue types and find that high-level f5C modification is present in mammals but lacking in lower eukaryotes. Our work sheds light on mitochondrial tRNA modifications throughout eukaryotic evolution and provides a general platform for characterizing the f5C epitranscriptome.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1827724-f0005.jpg


The function of cellular RNA can be modulated by chemical modifications installed post-transcriptionally. Known as the epitranscriptome, over 150 distinct modifications have been reported to exist on RNA12. A number of well-studied modifications have important roles in RNA metabolism, protein translation, and RNA trafficking3, however, we lack information on the function and distribution of most modifications. Further, RNA modification levels and their associated writer, eraser, and reader proteins can be dysregulated in certain disease states4, underscoring the need for a comprehensive understanding of epitranscriptomic mechanisms in biological systems.

A major challenge in the study of RNA modifications is the ability to map modifications at single-nucleotide resolution and measure their stoichiometry5. While Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized transcriptomic studies, many modifications are “silent” upon RNA-seq analysis since they are reverse transcribed like the parent unmodified base, necessitating the development of alternative approaches for modification-specific sequencing. Approaches for modification mapping compatible with Illumina sequencing6 (the most commonly utilized NGS platform) generally fall into two categories: 1) antibody enrichment of modified RNAs78 or 2) chemical/enzymatic conversion of the modified base to an adduct that can be identified based upon a distinctive reverse transcription (RT) signature911. The second approach, particularly when the signature is a sequence mutation as opposed to an RT stop, is often preferred since it can provide higher resolution, less sequence bias, and modification stoichiometry; however, current strategies for RNA modification mapping mediated by chemical or enzymatic conversion are only applicable to a small number of modified bases, and there is a great need for the development of new approaches to characterize the epitranscriptome.

Herein, we develop a chemical approach to sequence 5-formylcytosine (f5C) on RNA at single-nucleotide resolution. 5-formylcytosine has been found on isolated tRNA isoacceptors1214, but we lack robust approaches to quantitatively sequence this modification and characterize its distribution across the transcriptome. Our strategy, which we name Mal-Seq, is based upon selective malononitrile-mediated labeling (Fig. 1a) and C-to-T conversion upon reverse transcription, amplification and sequencing. Chemical labeling with malononitrile is mild, efficient, and quantitative, and we exploit these properties to measure the levels of f5C at C34 on mt-tRNA(Met) in diverse organisms and tissue types.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Malononitrile labeling of f5C on RNA. (a) Structure of malononitrile-f5C adduct and effects on Watson-Crick base pairing. (b) LC-QQQ-MS analysis of f5C levels in RNA oligo1 after treatment with malononitrile. Data are mean ± s.d. (n = 2). (c) LC-QQQ-MS analysis of f5C and hm5C levels in total RNA before and after treatment with malononitrile or 1,3-indandione. Data are mean ± s.d. (n = 3).

In order to sequence RNA f5C, we surveyed the literature for chemical transformations that would be selective for the modified base and generate a mutational signature. Notably, Yi and co-workers previously demonstrated that malononitrile15 and 1,3-indandione16 react with 5-formylcytosine in DNA to form adducts that induce C-to-T mutations upon DNA polymerase read-through (Fig. 1a and Fig. S1a). Therefore, we investigated the suitability of these reactions for sequencing f5C on RNA using total RNA and an artificial f5C-containing RNA transcript generated by in vitro transcription as model substrates. We started by quantifying depletion of f5C in RNA upon treatment with malononitrile or 1,3-indandione using nucleoside LC-MS/MS (Table S1). Gratifyingly, we measured 96.9±0.004% reduction in f5C levels upon treatment of our model f5C RNA with malononitrile (Fig. 1b). In addition, treatment of total cellular RNA with malononitrile or 1,3-indandione resulted in 90–92% (malononitrile: 91.5 ± 0.002%, 1,3-indandione: 90.0 ± 0.004%) reduction of f5C levels (Fig. 1c). Importantly, levels of related modifications in total RNA such as 5-methylcytidine (m5C) or 5-hydroxymethylcytidine (hm5C) remained unchanged (Fig. 1c and Fig. S1c), and analysis of RNA integrity using gel electrophoresis or Bioanalyzer assay demonstrated minimal RNA degradation (Fig. S1d and S1e), indicating that these transformations are selective for f5C and sufficiently mild for RNA sequencing.

Next, we tested whether the generated f5C adducts would produce a sequence mutation upon reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). Given comparable reaction efficiency between f5C and malononitrile or 1,3-indandione, we chose to work with malononitrile due to its enhanced solubility. We treated an in vitro transcribed RNA containing a single f5C site at 100% stoichiometry with malononitrile and performed RT-PCR. The f5C site was positioned in a Taqα1 digestion site such that mutation of C to another base could be monitored by restriction enzyme digestion17 (Fig. 2a). As shown, the RT-PCR products generated from untreated f5C RNA or an unmodified RNA are quantitatively digested by Taqα1, while malononitrile treatment of the f5C RNA inhibited digestion by ~50–60% (Fig. 2b and Fig. S2). To characterize the nature of the sequence change, we performed Sanger sequencing, which indicated that 60% of the transcripts contained a C-to-T mutation, while the remaining 40% contained a C (Fig. 2c). No other mutations were detected at the f5C site or surrounding residues. To further confirm our result and generate a calibration curve relating f5C stoichiometry and C-to-T conversion, we used high-throughput sequencing. Our data show a linear correlation between f5C levels ranging from 5–100% stoichiometry and malononitrile-induced C-to-T mutation (Fig. 2d and Table S2) with a conversion factor near 0.5 (i.e. ~50% C-to-T conversion after malononitrile treatment corresponds to 100% f5C). Given the depth of coverage afforded by high-throughput sequencing analysis, we could also detect mutations to G/A or deletions at the f5C site after malononitrile treatment, but the frequency of such events was low (0.1%). In addition, we tested RNA transcripts containing two or three f5C modification sites within different sequence contexts and observed similar levels of C-to-T conversion at each site upon malononitrile treatment (Fig. 2e, Fig. S2b and Table S3). Taken together, our results demonstrate that malononitrile-induced C-to-T mutations can be used to quantitatively sequence f5C modifications on RNA at nucleotide resolution and within diverse sequence contexts. We named this approach Mal-Seq.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Quantitative sequencing of RNA f5C by Mal-Seq. (a) Schematic of Mal-Seq workflow. (b) Taqα1 enzymatic digestion assay to detect base mutations mediated by malononitrile labeling. (c) Malononitrile-mediated C-to-T conversion measured by colony picking and Sanger sequencing. Left: Representative Sanger sequencing traces; Right: Quantification analysis (n = 10). (d) Calibration curve relating f5C levels in RNA oligo1 and malononitrile-mediated C-to-T conversion. C-to-T mutations were measured by Illumina sequencing. Data are mean ± s.d. (n = 2). (e) C-to-T conversion at two distinct f5C-modified sites in RNA oligo2. Mutations were measured by Illumina sequencing. Data are mean ± s.d. (n = 2).

In order to demonstrate the utility of Mal-Seq, we applied our approach to characterize endogenous f5C modification levels in the anticodon loop of mt-tRNA(Met). Studies have indicated the presence of f5C at the C34 “wobble base” of mt-tRNA(Met) in a number of organisms, where it is proposed to facilitate the decoding of unconventional AUA and AUU Met codons among mitochondrial genes18. However, the lack of a unified, quantitative approach to characterize f5C modification levels has led to disparate findings regarding the prevalence and stoichiometry of f5C levels in biological systems. We started by applying Mal-Seq to quantify f5C on the wobble base of mt-tRNA(Met) from cultured human cells, where this modification has been best studied. Multiple groups have shown that f5C biogenesis at this position requires the sequential action of m5C methyltransferase NSUN3 followed by Fe(II), α-KG-dependent dioxygenase ALKBH11213, 1920, however quantification of modification levels has varied. Suzuki and co-workers used LC/MS analysis to show that C34 is fully modified to f5C20, while two independent reports relying upon primer extension and bisulfite-based sequencing methods found a mixture of f5C and m5C at this position13, 19. Therefore, we extracted total RNA from WT HEK293T cells and performed Mal-Seq using targeted RT-PCR of the anticodon region of mt-tRNA(Met). Our analysis shows 57.98±0.16% malononitrile-induced C-to-T conversion, indicating that mt-tRNA(Met) is fully modified with f5C at the wobble base (Fig. 3b, 3c and Table S4), consistent with Suzuki’s findings. In addition, we performed parallel analyses on RNA extracted from ALKBH1 or NSUN3 KO cells generated by CRISPR/Cas9 technology and found <0.3% C-to-T mutation (Fig. 3c, Fig. S3 and Table S4), confirming that both enzymes are required for f5C installation on mt-tRNA(Met).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Mal-Seq reveals f5C34 in mt-tRNA(Met) is fully modified in HEK293T cells. (a) Schematic showing the formation of f5C by NSUN3 and ALKBH1 on mt-tRNA(Met). (b) RT-PCR of mt-tRNA(Met) amplified from WT, ALKBH1 KO, and NSUN3 KO cell lines. (c) C-to-T mutation at C34 on mt-tRNA(Met) detected by Mal-Seq using RNA from WT, ALKBH1 KO, and NSUN3 KO cells. Data are mean ± s.d. (n = 2).

We next characterized the presence of f5C on the wobble position of mt-tRNA(Met) in other eukaryotes. This modification has been found in organisms including squid21, flies22, chicken23, -and cow14, but the extent of f5C modification in these species is largely unknown. We obtained total RNA from budding yeast, flies, C. elegans and mouse and characterized f5C levels by Mal-Seq using species-specific primers for each mt-tRNA(Met) (Fig. S4). In yeast and flies, we found no evidence of f5C on mt-tRNA(Met), indicating that this modification is absent or below our limit of detection (Fig. 4a and Table S5). Budding yeast lack a clear ALKBH1 homolog, which is consistent with low f5C modification. While f5C on mt-tRNA(Met) has been reported to occur in flies, modification levels were partial and quantitation was never performed22. In contrast, C. elegans showed 26.65 ±1.65 % Mal-Seq C-to-T conversion corresponding to ~50% of the mt-tRNA(Met) modified with f5C at the wobble position. This is in line with the recent characterization of a mitochondrial ALKBH1 homolog in this organism24. We also measured f5C levels in different mouse tissues including heart, brain, and liver. In these tissues, we observed 37.8–42.9% (liver:37.8 ± 1.7%, heart: 41.5 ± 3.2%, brain: 42.9 ± 1.3%) C-to-T conversion corresponding to ~70–80% f5C modification, with a slight decrease in the liver (Fig. 4b and Table S5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Detection of f5C34 on mt-tRNA(Met) among different organisms. (a) Mal-Seq analysis of C34 on mt-tRNA(Met) using RNA extracted from C.elegans, budding yeast, and D. melanogaster. (b) Mal-Seq analysis of C34 on mt-tRNA(Met) in different mouse tissues. (c) Schematic showing f5C levels on mt-tRNA(Met) in different organisms detected by Mal-Seq. Data are mean ± s.d. (n = 2 for yeast, C. elegans, fly S2 cells; n = 4 for mouse tissues; n = 2 technical replicates for fly embryos). P values were determined using a two-sided unpaired student’s t-test.

In this work we develop a chemical sequencing approach, Mal-Seq, for detecting and quantifying 5-formylcytosine on RNA based upon malononitrile-mediated C-to-T conversion during RT-PCR. Using model f5C containing RNAs, we show that Mal-Seq can detect f5C sites in diverse sequence contexts and that C-to-T mutation frequency correlates linearly with f5C levels between 5 to 100% stoichiometry. An important limitation of our approach is that malononitrile-mediated C-to-T conversion at f5C sites is partial (~50%); therefore, identification and quantification of low stoichiometry f5C modifications (<10%) may pose a challenge.

We applied Mal-Seq to analyze f5C modification at the wobble base of mt-tRNA(Met) in different organisms and different tissues types. Our results show that mt-tRNA(Met) is fully modified with f5C in human HEK293T cell, and demonstrate ~70–80% modification levels in the mouse tissues that we assayed, consistent with the important role of this modification for mitochondrial translation in mammals1213, 19. Interestingly, modification levels are largely invariant in the different murine tissues that we sampled. Oxidation of m5C to f5C on mt-tRNA(Met) requires ALKBH1, which uses O2 and α-KG as cofactors. In principle, ALKBH1 activity (and as a consequence mitochondrial translation efficiency) could be responsive to fluctuations in levels of these central metabolites; while this hypothesis remains to be tested explicitly, our data suggests that installation of f5C on mt-tRNA(Met) is largely independent of the physiological fluctuations in metabolite levels across different tissues under the conditions tested. In addition, we find that high-level f5C modification (>50%) is characteristic of mammals and absent in lower eukaryotes (Fig. 4c). Since recognition of mitochondrial Met AUA/AUU codons is important in many eukaryotes, other mechanisms must exist to support this role in systems lacking f5C. Alternatively, lower level f5C modification may be sufficient to satisfy the requirements of mitochondrial translation in these organisms.

Finally, the development of nucleotide resolution sequencing strategies for detecting f5C modification opens opportunities for mapping this modified base transcriptome-wide in different organisms. While our work was in review, two complementary strategies for chemical sequencing of f5C were reported by Meier25 and Zhou26 relying upon hydride reduction of f5C to dihydrouridine derivatives. In mammals, f5C has been detected in total RNA by LC-MS analysis27, but it is unknown whether this modification occurs outside of the anticodon of mt-tRNA (Met). Interestingly, ALKBH1 has been shown to reside outside of the mitochondria in the nucleus28, raising the possibility of f5C sites on non-mitochondrial RNAs. Chemical sequencing strategies, together with identification of the relevant writer enzymes, should enable comprehensive investigation of the f5C epitranscriptome and shed light on its role in biology. Such studies are underway and will be reported in due course.

Supplementary Material

supplementary info

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We thank E. Gavis for providing total RNA from fly tissues, Z. Chen and J. Rabinowitz for providing mice tissues, A. Sharma and A. Leifer for providing worms, and E. Lai for providing fly S2 cells. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (RO1 GM132189 to R.E.K.), the National Science Foundation (CAREER award MCB-1942565 to R.E.K.), Sidney Kimmel Foundation, and Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. A.E.A. acknowledges support from an Eli Lilly-Edward C. Taylor Fellowship in Chemistry and A.L. was supported by the Princeton Catalysis Initiative. All authors thank Princeton University for financial support.

ABBREVIATIONS

RT-PCR

reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

f5C

5-formylcytosine

m5C

5-methylcytidine

hm5C

5-hydroxymethylcytidine

α-kG

alpha ketoglutarate

Footnotes

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

Supporting Information containing chemical and biological methods, high-throughput sequencing data, nucleoside mass spectrometry data, and uncropped gel and western blot images is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website.

REFERENCES

  • 1.McCown PJ; Ruszkowska A; Kunkler CN; Breger K; Hulewicz JP; Wang MC; Springer NA; Brown JA, Naturally occurring modified ribonucleosides. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 2020, 11 (5), e1595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Boccaletto P; Machnicka MA; Purta E; Piatkowski P; Baginski B; Wirecki TK; de Crecy-Lagard V; Ross R; Limbach PA; Kotter A. et al. , MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2018, 46 (D1), D303–D307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nachtergaele S; He C, The emerging biology of RNA post-transcriptional modifications. RNA Biol 2017, 14 (2), 156–163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jonkhout N; Tran J; Smith MA; Schonrock N; Mattick JS; Novoa EM, The RNA modification landscape in human disease. RNA 2017, 23 (12), 1754–1769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li X; Xiong X; Yi C, Epitranscriptome sequencing technologies: decoding RNA modifications. Nat Methods 2016, 14 (1), 23–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bentley DR; Balasubramanian S; Swerdlow HP; Smith GP; Milton J; Brown CG; Hall KP; Evers DJ; Barnes CL; Bignell HR et al. , Accurate whole human genome sequencing using reversible terminator chemistry. Nature 2008, 456 (7218), 53–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Meyer KD; Saletore Y; Zumbo P; Elemento O; Mason CE; Jaffrey SR, Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3’ UTRs and near stop codons. Cell 2012, 149 (7), 1635–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dominissini D; Moshitch-Moshkovitz S; Schwartz S; Salmon-Divon M; Ungar L; Osenberg S; Cesarkas K; Jacob-Hirsch J; Amariglio N; Kupiec M. et al. , Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 2012, 485 (7397), 201–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sas-Chen A; Thomas JM; Matzov D; Taoka M; Nance KD; Nir R; Bryson KM; Shachar R; Liman GLS; Burkhart BW et al. , Dynamic RNA acetylation revealed by quantitative cross-evolutionary mapping. Nature 2020, 583 (7817), 638–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carlile TM; Rojas-Duran MF; Zinshteyn B; Shin H; Bartoli KM; Gilbert WV, Pseudouridine profiling reveals regulated mRNA pseudouridylation in yeast and human cells. Nature 2014, 515 (7525), 143–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schaefer M; Pollex T; Hanna K; Lyko F, RNA cytosine methylation analysis by bisulfite sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37 (2), e12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kawarada L; Suzuki T; Ohira T; Hirata S; Miyauchi K; Suzuki T, ALKBH1 is an RNA dioxygenase responsible for cytoplasmic and mitochondrial tRNA modifications. Nucleic Acids Res 2017, 45 (12), 7401–7415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haag S; Sloan KE; Ranjan N; Warda AS; Kretschmer J; Blessing C; Hubner B; Seikowski J; Dennerlein S; Rehling P. et al. , NSUN3 and ABH1 modify the wobble position of mt-tRNAMet to expand codon recognition in mitochondrial translation. EMBO J 2016, 35 (19), 2104–2119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Moriya J; Yokogawa T; Wakita K; Ueda T; Nishikawa K; Crain PF; Hashizume T; Pomerantz SC; McCloskey JA; Kawai G; et al. , A novel modified nucleoside found at the first position of the anticodon of methionine tRNA from bovine liver mitochondria. Biochemistry 1994, 33 (8), 2234–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu C; Gao Y; Guo H; Xia B; Song J; Wu X; Zeng H; Kee K; Tang F; Yi C, Single-Cell 5-Formylcytosine Landscapes of Mammalian Early Embryos and ESCs at Single-Base Resolution. Cell Stem Cell 2017, 20 (5), 720–731 e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xia B; Han D; Lu X; Sun Z; Zhou A; Yin Q; Zeng H; Liu M; Jiang X; Xie W; He C; Yi C, Bisulfite-free, base-resolution analysis of 5-formylcytosine at the genome scale. Nat Methods 2015, 12 (11), 1047–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yuan F; Bi Y; Siejka-Zielinska P; Zhou YL; Zhang XX; Song CX, Bisulfite-free and base-resolution analysis of 5-methylcytidine and 5-hydroxymethylcytidine in RNA with peroxotungstate. Chem Commun (Camb) 2019, 55 (16), 2328–2331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Van Haute L; Powell CA; Minczuk M, Dealing with an Unconventional Genetic Code in Mitochondria: The Biogenesis and Pathogenic Defects of the 5-Formylcytosine Modification in Mitochondrial tRNA(Met). Biomolecules 2017, 7 (1). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Van Haute L; Dietmann S; Kremer L; Hussain S; Pearce SF; Powell CA; Rorbach J; Lantaff R; Blanco S; Sauer S. et al. , Deficient methylation and formylation of mt-tRNA(Met) wobble cytosine in a patient carrying mutations in NSUN3. Nat Commun 2016, 7, 12039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakano S; Suzuki T; Kawarada L; Iwata H; Asano K; Suzuki T, NSUN3 methylase initiates 5-formylcytidine biogenesis in human mitochondrial tRNA(Met). Nat Chem Biol 2016, 12 (7), 546–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tomita K; Ueda T; Watanabe K, 5-formylcytidine (f5C) found at the wobble position of the anticodon of squid mitochondrial tRNA(Met)CAU. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1997, (37), 197–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tomita K; Ueda T; Ishiwa S; Crain PF; McCloskey JA; Watanabe K, Codon reading patterns in Drosophila melanogaster mitochondria based on their tRNA sequences: a unique wobble rule in animal mitochondria. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27 (21), 4291–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Takemoto C; Ueda T; Miura K; Watanabe K, Nucleotide sequences of animal mitochondrial tRNAs(Met) possibly recognizing both AUG and AUA codons. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999, (42), 77–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wagner A; Hofmeister O; Rolland SG; Maiser A; Aasumets K; Schmitt S; Schorpp K; Feuchtinger A; Hadian K; Schneider S. et al. , Mitochondrial Alkbh1 localizes to mtRNA granules and its knockdown induces the mitochondrial UPR in humans and C. elegans. J Cell Sci 2019, 132 (19). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Link CN; Gamage ST; Gallimore DA; Kopajtich R; Evans CN; Nance SR; Fox SD; Andresson T; Chari R; Ivanic J. et al. , Protonation-Dependent Sequencing of 5-formylcytidine in RNA. bioRxiv 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang Y; Chen Z; Zhang X; Weng X; Deng J; Yang W; Wu F; Han S; Xia C; Zhou Y. et al. , Single-Base Resolution Mapping Reveals Distinct 5-Formylcytidine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mRNAs. ACS Chem Biol 2022, 17 (1), 77–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang HY; Xiong J; Qi BL; Feng YQ; Yuan BF, The existence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and 5-formylcytosine in both DNA and RNA in mammals. Chem Commun (Camb) 2016, 52 (4), 737–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhang M; Yang S; Nelakanti R; Zhao W; Liu G; Li Z; Liu X; Wu T; Xiao A; Li H, Mammalian ALKBH1 serves as an N(6)-mA demethylase of unpairing DNA. Cell Res 2020, 30 (3), 197–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplementary info

RESOURCES