Abstract
Background
Various modalities of treatment have been used for the management of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures which include K-wire fixation, mini plates, lag screws fixation, intramedullary screw fixation and external fixator application. The aim of this study was to analyse complications and patient-related functional outcomes after antegrade or retrograde crossed intramedullary K-wire fixation of metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures.
Methods
Thirty-one patients (36–fractures, 16–metacarpals, 20–proximal phalanx) meeting the study criteria were included in this prospective study. Fixation of the fractures was done by use of crossed intramedullary K-wire using the principles of 3-point fixation.
Results
The mean preoperative angulation of the fractures noted in this study was 35.8° which was significantly reduced at final follow-up. Union was noted at a mean period of 4.2 ± 6.8 weeks. The mean range of motion at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint was 96.4% and 86.3%, respectively as compared to the opposite hand. Stiffness (n = 3, 14.2%) and persistent pain (n = 2, 9.5%) at the joints were the most common complications noted in this study.
Conclusion
Crossed percutaneous intramedullary fixation of small bone fractures of the hand is a versatile method with advantages such as cost-effectiveness and lesser operative time when compared to other modalities of fixation. Earlier range of motion (ROM) exercises can be started due to preservation of gliding planes, no surgical wound along with good fracture stability and minimal hardware impingement.
How to cite this article
Ahmad S, Gupta T, Ansari S, et al. Intramedullary Crossed K-wire Fixation for the Hand Fractures is a Useful Treatment Modality: A Prospective Observational Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(2):74–80.
Keywords: Crossed intramedullary, Hand, K-wire, Metacarpal, Phalanx
Introduction
Fractures of the carpals, metacarpals and phalanges account for approximately 15–19% of fractures in adults with 59% of these occurring in the phalanges and 33% in the metacarpals.1 These fractures are generally observed in young and active males.2 They are generally encountered in the emergency department due to multiple causes like road traffic accidents, machine injury, crush injury, assaults and explosion based injury.3,4 Most often these injuries are neglected as minor injuries and later present with functional limitation and disability. The optimal goal of the treatment of hand injuries is the healing of the wound if any, bony union and most importantly restoration of the function. Surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures like dislocations as well as mal-rotations with comminuted fractures.5
Various modalities of treatment have been used for their management which includes K-wire fixation, mini plates, lag screws fixation, intramedullary screw fixation and external fixator application.6–10 An alternative surgical technique is the insertion of one or multiple crossed intramedullary K-wires through a minimally invasive incision in the metacarpal and proximal phalanx. K-wire fixation is a well-established technique for fixing metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.11–13 The aim of this study was to analyse complications and patient-related functional outcomes after antegrade or retrograde crossed intramedullary K-wire fixation of metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures.
Materials and Methods
This was a prospective study conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital from January 2018 to December 2019. Prior institutional ethical approval was obtained and informed consent was taken from all study participants. During the above time period, a total of 36 patients were operated on by the said technique. Five patients were lost to follow-up, hence 31 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis.
Inclusion criteria were: (1) Adult patients between ages 18 and 60 years, (2) Closed or open fractures without neurovascular injury, (3) Fracture angulation >35° and (4) Displacement >50%. Pathological fractures and fractures with associated injuries in the same limb were excluded from the study.
Surgical Technique
All the cases were operated under regional or local anaesthesia. Open fractures were initially treated with copious saline wash and debridement of the non-viable tissues. Under fluoroscopic image control, manual traction and flexion manoeuvres of the metacarpophalangeal joints or interphalangeal joints were done to the reduction of the fractures. Minimally invasive skin stab incisions were done over the epiphysio-metaphyseal area of the bone. The proximal or distal location of the incision was decided by the antegrade or retrograde insertion technique. A cortical window was made initially at the entry point by the use of the smallest size drill bit. The pre-bent 2 K-wires, 1.5–2 mm thick, either over an automated drill or manually over T-handle were passed percutaneously in the metacarpal or phalanx in crossed fashion from the predefined entry point at 5 mm away from the epiphysis over the dorsolateral aspect so that it does not interfere with extensor tendons or ligaments. After insertion of the K-wires, it was checked under fluoroscopy so as not to cross the subchondral bone distally and simultaneously K-wires were rotated in the medullary canal to make the concave side of the wire face the toward canal (Fig. 1). The outer part of the K-wire was bent and cut around 5 mm outside of the skin and the pin-track dressing was done. Immobilization in a functional slab was done in cases of multiple fractures in the hand or associated soft tissue injuries. In such cases, mobilization was started 4 weeks after wire and slab removal.
Fig. 1.
Schematic diagram showed how the K-wire had inserted in the metacarpal and phalangeal fracture in this study
All patients were followed up postoperatively at 2, 6, 12 weeks and 11 months for clinical and radiological evaluation. Complications like pin-track infections, construct loosening, stiffness or wound infection were noted. K-wire removal was done at 4 weeks. After wire removal, extensive physical therapy was done to prevent stiffness of joints distal to the wrist joint. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 11 months.
Assessment of functional outcome was done in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) score, quick disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, hand grip and ROM at different time points (2, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months). Total active ROM was assessed by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) scale (Table 1, Fig. 2).
Table 1.
American Society for Surgery of the Hand scale for grading outcome at final follow-up
Degree of ROM | Rating | |
---|---|---|
ROM from MCP to DIP: Digits 2–5 | ROM from MCP to DIP: Thumb | |
>220 | >120 | Excellent |
>180–220 | >100–120 | Good |
<180 | <100 | Fair |
Fig. 2.
Schematic diagram showed how to measure ROM at the different joints of the hand
Demographics have been depicted in Table 2. Qualitative data were expressed as counts and percentages, quantitative data were expressed by mean ± SD or range. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 18. Results were analysed using paired t-test with a significance level set at 0.05.
Table 2.
Demographic data of the patients included in the study
Age in years: mean (SD) | 30.9 ± 11.17 |
Gender | |
Male | 23 (74.1%) |
Female | 8 (25.9%) |
Side | |
Right | 21 (67.7%) |
Left | 10 (32.3%) |
Digit | |
Index | 14 (38.8%) |
Middle | 11 (30.5%) |
Ring | 6 (16.6%) |
Small | 5 (13.8%) |
Bone involved | |
Metacarpal | 16 (44.4%) |
Proximal phalanx | 20 (55.6%) |
Mechanism of injury | |
Crush Injury | 6 (19.3%) |
RTA | 15 (48.3%) |
Fall | 6 (19.3%) |
Assault | 2 (6.4%) |
Machine injury | 2 (6.4%) |
Preoperative angulation (mean) | 35.8° |
Dominance | |
Right | 27 (87%) |
Left | 4 (13%) |
Open fractures Closed fractures |
12 (33.3%) 24 (66.7%) |
Time to surgery (hours): mean (SD) | 22.57 ± 25.09 |
Results
Thirty-one patients with 36 (16–metacarpals, 20–proximal phalanx) fractures meeting the study criteria were included. The majority of the subjects were right-handed (87%) and males (74.1%). The mean preoperative angulation of the fractures noted in this study was 35.8° which was significantly reduced at the final follow-up (p <0.05) (Figs 3 and 4). All the fractures united at a mean period of 4.2 ± 6.8 weeks (Table 3). The mean range of motion at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint was 96.4% and 86.3%, respectively as compared to the opposite hand (Fig. 5). The mean grip strength noted at the final follow-up was 96.4% of the contralateral hand. 93.5% (29/31) of patients had excellent to good outcomes according to the ASSH scale at final follow-up.
Figs 3A to D.
Preoperative and immediate postoperative radiograph showed an oblique fracture of the proximal phalanx of the third digit of the left hand and crossed K-wire fixation of it
Figs 4A and B.
Preoperative and postoperative radiograph after fracture fixation for fifth metacarpal fracture of the right hand
Table 3.
Postoperative outcome measures of the patients included in the study
Follow-up in months mean (SD) | 6.2 ± 12.3 |
Time of union in weeks mean (SD) | 4.2 ± 6.8 |
Postoperative angulation in (°) mean (SD) | 1 ± 1.76 |
Postoperative ROM at MCP joint in (°) mean (SD) | 82 ± 3.45 |
Postoperative ROM at PIP joint in (°) mean (SD) | 95 ± 9.44 |
Postoperative TAM in the finger in (°) mean (SD) | 245 ± 28.88 |
Postoperative hand grip strength (percentage) mean (SD) | 96.4% ± 32.3 |
Postoperative VAS score mean (SD) | 2 ± 2.1 |
Postoperative quick DASH score mean (SD) | 12 ± 4.4 |
Duration of surgery (minutes) mean (SD) | 17 ± 4.63 |
Figs 5A to C.
Showed excellent ROM at MCP and IPJ at 6 weeks after K-wire fixation of third proximal phalangeal fracture of the right hand
Stiffness (n = 3, 14.2%) and persistent pain (n = 2, 9.5%) at the joints were the most common complications noted in this study (Table 4). The metacarpophalangeal joints were the common joint to have stiffness (n = 2). They were relieved with persistent physical therapy and symptoms had resolved at the final follow-up. In one case each pin-track infection and malunion was noted. Pin-track infection healed by regular dressings. Revision surgery was planned to treat the malunion.
Table 4.
Frequency of complications noted in the study
Complications | Number | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Stiffness | 3 | 14.28% |
Persistent pain | 2 | 9.5% |
Pin-track infection | 1 | 4.7% |
Mal-union | 1 | 4.7% |
Discussion
Hand fractures are the second most common fractures in the upper extremity after the distal radius, accounting for 20% of fractures in general trauma.14 Only a few population-based epidemiological studies have been conducted till now with most of the data gathered from the emergency or hospital settings. Hence the studies suggest variable figures when it comes to the distribution of these understudied and often overlooked fractures, with one study showing an incidence of 12.5 and 8.4 per 10,000 person-years for the phalanges and metacarpals, respectively.15 Another hospital-based study describes the prevalence of this injury subset as fractures of the carpals, metacarpals and phalanges accounting for approximately 15–19% of fractures in adults with 59% of these occurring in the phalanges, 33% in the metacarpals and 8% in the carpal bones.1 Despite the slight variations in proportions of these fractures, it concurs that hand injuries can significantly affect the functional impairment and quality of life of the patient. These injuries are can cause considerable delay in returning to work if not addressed timely.
The current study describes the clinical and functional outcome of the crossed intramedullary K-wire fixation and early mobilization in hand fractures. Studies on other methods of hardware fixation have been assessed previously in the literature (Table 5). Fixation techniques such as miniplate, lag screws fixation and mini external fixators in the small bone of hand fractures have been widely used and compared. There are no succinct advantages of one procedure over another described in the literature. The indication for the alternative methods depends mainly on the availability of the implant and the surgeon's preference. Correction of rotational deformities, angulation and shortening remains the prime objective in the treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures.16 Shortening at the fracture site can lead to significant loss of power as well as extension lag.
Table 5.
Studies comparing the other modalities of fixation (like a lag screw, mini plate, JESS fixator) with K-wire fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fracture of the hand
Study, method | Sample size | Results | Complications |
---|---|---|---|
Reformat et al.17
(plate and screw vs K-wire) in hand fractures |
158 patients (192 fractures out of which 90 metacarpal and 102 phalangeal fractures) | Mini plate and lag screw group (A): Operative time (minutes)–149, period of immobilization (days) 18, active ROM (°)–145 K-wire group (B): Operative time (min)–84, period of immobilization (days)–33, active ROM (°)–149. |
Group (A): Adhesion and persistent pain. Group (B): Infection (pin-track site), mal-union, non-union, persistent pain. |
Pandey et al.18 (mini plate vs closed crossed pinning of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures) | 32 patients (46 fractures in which 32 metacarpal, 12 phalanges and 2 thumbs involved) | Mini plate group (A): Total active ROM: 239.55, DASH (range 0–100): 42.48, Hand grip (max 25 N/m2): 16.75. K-wire group (B): Total active ROM: 238.36, DASH (range 0–100): 37.40, Hand grip (N/m2): 17.63. |
Group (A): None Group (B): Pin-track infection |
Kootstra et al.22 (K-wire vs lag screw and mini plate) | 159 patients (159 proximal phalangeal fractures) | K-wire group (A): DASH, SD (range) 6.0, SD 8.6 (0–38), PRHWE, SD (range) 9.4, SD 15 (0–58). Mini plate (B): DASH, SD (range) 4.6, SD 6.9 (0–35), PRHWE, SD (range) 8.6, SD 13 (0–52). Lag screw (C): DASH, SD (range) 3.9, SD 9.1 (0–51), PRHWE, SD (range) 5.6, SD 14 (0–82). |
Group (A): Mal-union, non-union, infection Group (B): Mal-union, non-union, infection and loss of fixation (max) complications) Group (C): Loss of fixation, infection |
Mishra et al.25 (JESS-Joshi External Stabilizing System) |
38 patients (21 MC and 17 phalangeal fractures) | 73.70% excellent and 26.30% has good active ROM, no poor results. | Pin-track infection in 7 patients, 2 had loosening of K-wire (23.70%) |
Miniplate fixation is a method of rigid fixation which addresses the fracture deformity in particular but it needs extensive exposure to the fracture site. Hence, as compared to K-wires it is associated with increased operative time and extensive surgery leading to local soft tissue damage, loss of gliding planes, delayed postoperative physiotherapy, increased stiffness and surgical site pain.17,18 Another disadvantage with miniplates is the lack of design versatility, making it a bulky implant for hand fractures, with implant impingement a frequent complication. This further limits the use of implants on hand and often requires subsequent additional procedures for implant removal.19
Lag screw fixation provides a biomechanically stable fixation for simple oblique and spiral fractures. Studies have demonstrated comparable functional outcomes with the use of lag screw in terms of the range of motion, DASH score and grasping strength, although the time to return to work was longer as compared to fixation with miniplate.20,21 Despite good clinical outcomes, the use of lag screws is limited to a subset of hand fractures with a particular fracture pattern. In addition, minor drilling errors may lead to implant loosening with little scope for correction due to limited bone stock in small bones of the hand, making the loss of fixation a common complication.22
The use of intramedullary screws has also been reported in the literature.9,10 It was initially reported for comminuted subcapital metacarpal fracture.23 The rationale for use of a headless screw is that it holds reduction as well as provides stability by distal hold in the subchondral bone and proximal fixation in the endosteal isthmus of the medullary canal. Also, the buried location of the screw removes the need for future removal. The rotational stability as well as the lack of hardware removal are the advantages of this technique over intramedullary K wiring. Biomechanically, the strength of intramedullary devices is comparable to multiple intramedullary K wiring.24
The mini external fixator is another popular method for the fixation of hand fractures as it provides the option for dynamic stability. The fixator is based on the principle of ligamentotaxis and provides near excellent reduction of the fracture without opening of fracture site and minimal handling of soft tissue but may prove to be technically challenging. Though this procedure provides a good functional outcome, pin-track infection is seen in almost one-fourth of the patients.25 The simplicity and cost-effectiveness of the device and fixation technique is countered by the fact that the patient has to carry the fixator which is physically discerned and may be uncomfortable for a few. Hence, this method of treatment is mostly reserved for comminuted and open injuries with bone loss.
Intramedullary K-wire fixation needs less soft tissue manipulation and can be complemented with earlier physiotherapy leading to good ROM at metacarpophalangeal joints. The advantages of using this method are its cost-effectiveness, a lesser operative time when compared to miniplate, lag screws and external fixators, early ROM exercises that can be started due to preservation of gliding planes, and no surgical wound along with good fracture stability and minimal hardware impingement. The procedure is short and can be performed on a daycare basis under local or regional anaesthesia with established excellent functional results as compared to other modalities. There are multiple methods of K-wire fixation like single K-wire fixation and double K-wire fixation (percutaneous intramedullary/percutaneous crossed K-wire fixation) (Table 6). In this study two pre-bent K-wires, 1.5–2 mm in size, either over an automated drill or manually over T-handle were passed percutaneously in the metacarpal or phalanx in crossed fashion from a predefined entry point at 5 mm away from epiphysis over the dorsolateral aspect, and then turned inside the canal making its concave side toward the medullary canal cresting a 3-point fixation. In the present study all the fractures united at a mean period of 4.2 ± 6.8 weeks, which is the shortest duration as compared to other studies.17,18,22,25 In addition, most of the patients were started with physiotherapy in immediate postoperative period. This can be attributed to extra stability after fixation of fracture with crossed percutaneous intramedullary K-wire. The mean range of motion at the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joint was 96.4% and 86.3% respectively as compared to the opposite hand (Fig. 5). The mean grip strength noted at final follow-up was 96.4% of the contralateral hand. 95.2% (20/21) patients had excellent to good outcome according to ASSH scale at final follow-up.
Table 6.
Summary of results of different studies fixing the metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with K-wire (different methods) and their results
Authors | Technique | Patients | Results | Complications |
---|---|---|---|---|
Green and Anderson26 | Closed reduction and extra-articular pinning; early mobilization | 26 fractures in 21 patients; mixed fracture patterns | 18 fractures regained full movement | No breakdown for fracture pattern described |
Belsky et al.27 | Trans-articular, intramedullary Pinning with rigid postoperative Casting |
31 base fractures (in cohort of 100 proximal phalanx shaft) | 61 excellent; 29 good; 10 poor | Pin-track infection and mal-union |
Joshi28 | Wire inserted into phalangeal base using awl; immobilized in moulded cast with PIP joint movements | 15 proximal third fractures (in larger cohort of 61 fractures) | 90% satisfactory | Complications: tendon rupture, loss of fixation, wire protrusion |
Hornbach and Cohen29 | Trans-articular pinning with 2 wires; thermoplastic splint immobilization | 9 base fractures in cohort of 12 proximal phalanx fractures failing conservative management | Mean TAM 265° | 3 patients had significant complications; 4 patients had rotational mal-union |
Faruqui et al.30 | Trans-articular wiring (25) Extra-articular pinning with 2 wires (25) | 50 unstable displaced fractures of proximal third of phalanx | Trans-articular mean TAM 201° Extra-articular mean TAM 198° |
Complications 54% trans-articular; 48% extra-articular cross pinning; 16% reoperation rate |
Van Bussel et al.31 | A pre-bended 0.8–1.5 mm K-wire was then intramedullary inserted in the metacarpal bone passing the fracture under fluoroscopy | 34 fractures of 27 patients | Functional outcome was excellent with mean PRWHE and DASH Scores of 7 and 5 points, respectively. |
In the form of persistent pain, dysaesthesia and decrease ROM. |
As with any study, this study also has some limitations like small sample size, short follow-up and lack of articular fractures in the study group. But the strength of this study is that it is a prospective study and very few studies in the literature have explored or studied this modality of crossed intramedullary K-wires in metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures.
Conclusion
Crossed percutaneous intramedullary fixation of small bone fractures of the hand is a versatile method with advantages such as cost-effectiveness and lesser operative time when compared to other modalities of fixation. Earlier ROM exercises can be started due to preservation of gliding planes, no surgical wound along with good fracture stability and minimal hardware impingement. The procedure is short and can be performed on an office basis under local or regional anaesthesia with excellent functional results.
Orcid
Tushar Gupta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6821-7594
Sajid Ansari https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-4999
Footnotes
Source of support: Nil
Conflict of interest: None
References
- 1.van Onselen EB, Karim RB, Hage JJ, et al. Prevalence and distribution of hand fractures. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(5):491–495. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(03)00103-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.De Jonge JJ, Kingma J, van der Lei B, et al. Fractures of the metacarpals. A retrospective analysis of incidence and aetiology and a review of the English-language literature. Injury. 1994;25(6):365–369. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90127-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alphonsus CK. Principles in the management of a mangled hand. Indian J Plast Surg. 2011;44(2):219–226. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.85343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tintle SM, Baechler MF, Nanos GP, 3rd, et al. Traumatic and trauma-related amputations: Part II: Upper extremity and future directions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(18):2934–2945. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Low CK, Wong HC, Low YP, et al. A cadaver study of the effects of dorsal angulation and shortening of the metacarpal shaft on the extension and flexion force ratios of the index and little fingers. J Hand Surg Br. 1995;20(5):609–613. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(05)80120-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Crockett DJ. Rigid fixation of bones of the hand using K-wires bonded with acrylic resin. Hand. 1974;6(1):106–107. doi: 10.1016/0072-968x(74)90022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cziffer E. Static fixation of finger fractures. Hand Clin. 1993;9(4):639–650. 8300733 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fitoussi F, Ip WY, Chow SP. External fixation for comminuted phalangeal fractures. A biomechanical cadaver study. J Hand Surg Br. 1996;21(6):760–764. doi: 10.1016/s0266-7681(96)80182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoang D, Huang J. Antegrade intramedullary screw fixation: a novel approach to metacarpal fractures. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2019;1(4):229–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tobert DG, Klausmeyer M, Mudgal CS. Intramedullary fixation of metacarpal fractures using headless compression screws. J Hand Microsurg. 2016;8(3):134–139. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1593390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Canale ST, Azar FM, Beaty JH. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. Elsevier; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Adi M, Miyamoto H, Taleb C, et al. Percutaneous fixation of first metacarpal base fractures using locked K-wires: a series of 14 cases. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2014;18(2):77–81. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0000000000000040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Spirito D. Percutaneous fixation of hand fractures using locked K-wires: mechanical analysis and clinical application. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2013;17(3):134–143. doi: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e31828afc48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Johansen A, Evans RJ, Stone MD, et al. Fracture incidence in England and Wales: a study based on the population of Cardiff. Injury. 1997;28(9–10):655–660. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00144-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Karl JW, Olson PR, Rosenwasser MP. The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(8):e242–e244. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, et al. Green's operative hand surgery E-Book: expert consult: online and print. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reformat DD, Nores GG, Lam G, et al. Outcome analysis of metacarpal and phalangeal fixation techniques at Bellevue Hospital. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;81(4):407–410. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pandey R, Soni N, Bhayana H, et al. Hand function outcome in closed small bone fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation by mini plate or closed crossed pinning: a randomized controlled trail. Musculoskelet Surg. 2019;103(1):99–105. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0542-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wong H-C, Wong H-K, Wong K-Y. Stainless steel 2.0-mm locking compression plate osteosynthesis system for the fixation of comminuted hand fractures in Asian adults. J Orthop Trauma Rehabilitation. 2011;15(2):57–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jotr.2011.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Desaldeleer-Le Sant A-S, Le Sant A, Beauthier-Landauer V, et al. Surgical management of closed, isolated proximal phalanx fractures in the long fingers: functional outcomes and complications of 87 fractures. Hand Surg Rehabil. 2017;36(2):127–135. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2016.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Başar H, Başar B, Başçı O, et al. Comparison of treatment of oblique and spiral metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with mini plate plus screw or screw only. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(4):499–504. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2164-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kootstra TJM, Keizer J, Bhashyam A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes and complications after surgical fixation of 143 proximal phalanx fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2020;45(4):327–334. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Boulton CL, Salzler M, Mudgal CS. Intramedullary cannulated headless screw fixation of a comminuted subcapital metacarpal fracture: case report. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(8):1260–1263. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.04.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Curtis BD, Fajolu O, Ruff ME, et al. Fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures: biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail crossed K-wires and plate-screw constructs. Orthop Surg. 2015;7(3):256–260. doi: 10.1111/os.12195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mishra AK, Adhikari V, Chalise P, et al. Jess fixator for metacarpal and phalangeal fracture. Nepal Med Coll J. 2019;21(1):48–52. doi: 10.3126/nmcj.v21i1.24853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Green DP, Anderson JR. Closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation of fractured phalanges. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(8):1651–1654. 4804987 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Belsky MR, Eaton RG, Lane LB. Closed reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9(5):725–729. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(84)80023-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Joshi BB. Percutaneous internal fixation of fractures of the proximal phalanges. Hand. 1976;8(1):86–92. doi: 10.1016/0072-968x(76)90069-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hornbach EE, Cohen MS. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of fractures of the proximal phalanx. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26(1):45–49. doi: 10.1054/jhsb.2000.0524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Faruqui S, Stern PJ, Kiefhaber TR. Percutaneous pinning of fractures in the proximal third of the proximal phalanx: complications and outcomes. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(7):1342–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.van Bussel EM, Houwert RM, Kootstra TJM, et al. Antegrade intramedullary Kirschner-wire fixation of displaced metacarpal shaft fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45(1):65–71. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0836-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]