Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology logoLink to Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
. 2022 Jun;70(6):2212. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.346035

Erratum: Anatomical and functional outcomes one year after vitrectomy and retinal massage for large macular holes

PMCID: PMC9359293  PMID: 35648033

In the article titled “Anatomical and functional outcomes one year after vitrectomy and retinal massage for large macular holes”, published in pages 895-899, Issue 4, Vol. 69 of Indian Journal of Ophthalmology,[1] Fig. 2 had been incorrectly published, OCT image at 6 months [Fig. 2d] was accidentally horizontally flipped. The figure legend and figure number are correct. The corrected figure is as below.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

OCT scans preoperatively [Figure 1a] and at 1 month [Figure 1b], 3 months [Figure 1c], 6 Months [Figure 1d] and 12 months [Figure 1e] postoperatively with coloured arrowheads showing ellipsoid zone defects gradually reducing

References

  • 1.Chakraborty D, Sengupta S, Mukherjee A, Majumdar S. Anatomical and functional outcomes one year after vitrectomy and retinal massage for large macular holes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:895–9. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1680_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Ophthalmology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer -- Medknow Publications

RESOURCES