Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
letter
. 2022 Aug 8;55(6):1129–1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2022.08.002

Inhaled ciclesonide for outpatients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis

Chi-Kuei Hsu 1, Chien-Ming Chao 2, Chih-Cheng Lai 3,
PMCID: PMC9359495  PMID: 35995666

Dear Editor,

In addition to antiviral agents for non-hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections,1 inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), such as ciclesonide has been repurposed as one of potential therapy for outpatients with COVID-19.2, 3, 4, 5 Although several randomized controlled trials (RCTs)2, 3, 4, 5 had investigated the efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide, their findings were not consistent. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the effect of inhaled ciclesonide for outpatients with COVID-19.

We searched PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 15, 2022. Only RCTs that investigated the clinical efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide in the treatment of patients with COVID-19 were included. The following data were extracted from each included study: year of publication, study design, study population and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the resolution of symptoms, and the secondary outcome was risk of hospitalization, mortality and adverse event (AE). Pooled estimates of the risk ratios (RRs) and the accompanying 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated by random effect model using Review Manager version 5.3.

Four RCTs2, 3, 4, 5 were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, 881 patients were involved in this study, in which 441 patients who received inhaled ciclesonide and 434 patients who received placebo or usual care (Table 1 ). Two of the included studies were phase 2 RCTs4 , 5 and another two were phase 3 RCTs.2 , 3 In addition to inhaled ciclesonide only, one RCT4 used a combination of inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide as the intervention.

Table 1.

The characteristics of the included studies.

Study Design Site Patients Intervention Comparator No. of patients
Inhaled ciclesonide Control
Ezer et al., 2021 (CONTAIN)4 Phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 3 provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and British Columbia) in Canada Outpatients with COVID-19 Inhaled ciclesonide (600 μg twice daily) and intranasal ciclesonide (200 μg daily) for 14 days Placebo 105 98
Song et al., 20215 Phase 2 open-label, trial 6 centres in South Korea Patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 Inhaled ciclesonide (320 μg twice daily for 14 days) Standard care 35 26
Clemency et al., 20212 Phase 3, double-blind controlled trial 10 centres in the US Outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 Inhaled ciclesonide 320 μg twice daily for 30 days Placebo 197 203
Duvignaud et al., 2022 (COVERAGE)3 Phase 3, open-label, controlled trial 14 centres in France Outpatients with COVID-19, risk factors for aggravation, symptoms for ≤7 days Inhaled ciclesonide 320 μg twice daily for 10 days vitamins and trace elements for 10 days 110 107

Overall, although the patients who received inhaled ciclesonide had higher rates of symptom resolution by day 7 and 14 than those in the control group, these differences did not reach statistical significance (day 7: RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.88–1.32; I2 = 0, p = 0.48; day 14: RR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.96–1.24; I2 = 0, p = 0.18) (Supplemental figure 1). This result remained unchanged in the leave-one-out sensitivity test, and in the subgroup analysis according to phase 2 or phase 3 studies, open-label or double-blind study designs. In addition, no significant difference in the risk of hospitalization was observed between the inhaled ciclesonide and control groups (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.71–2.89; I2 = 0, p = 0.32). On day 28, there was no mortality in both study and control groups. Finally, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the ICS and control groups (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.80–1.51; I2 = 23%, p = 0.57).

In summary, inhaled ciclesonide could not provide additional benefit in the relieving symptoms for outpatients with COVID-19, which was supported by the present meta-analysis of four RCTs2, 3, 4, 5 with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0) and further sensitivity and subgroup analysis. Additionally, we did not find that inhaled could help reduce the risk of hospitalization or mortality. Although it was as tolerable as comparators in patients with COVID-19, our finding did not support the use of inhaled ciclesonide in this clinical entity.

In conclusion, our findings indicated that inhaled ciclesonide did not help improve the clinical outcome of outpatients with COVID-19.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2022.08.002.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (32.1KB, docx)

References

  • 1.Lai C.C., Chao C.M., Hsueh P.R. Clinical efficacy of antiviral agents against coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2021;54:767–775. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2021.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clemency B.M., Varughese R., Gonzalez-Rojas Y., Morse C.G., Phipatanakul W., Koster D.J., et al. Efficacy of inhaled ciclesonide for outpatient treatment of adolescents and adults with symptomatic COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2022;182:42–49. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Duvignaud A., Lhomme E., Onaisi R., Sitta R., Gelley A., Chastang J., et al. Inhaled ciclesonide for outpatient treatment of COVID-19 in adults at risk of adverse outcomes: a randomised controlled trial (COVERAGE) Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28:1010–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ezer N., Belga S., Daneman N., Chan A., Smith B.M., Daniels S.A., et al. Inhaled and intranasal ciclesonide for the treatment of covid-19 in adult outpatients: CONTAIN phase II randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;375 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Song J.Y., Yoon J.G., Seo Y.B., Lee J., Eom J.S., Lee J.S., et al. Ciclesonide inhaler treatment for mild-to-moderate COVID-19: a randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial. J Clin Med. 2021;10:3545. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.docx (32.1KB, docx)

Articles from Journal of Microbiology, Immunology, and Infection are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES