Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Ment Health. 2022 Feb 9;27(2):434–444. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2022.2032594

Grit is associated with psychological health among older sexual minority men

Chukwuemeka N Okafor a, Mark Brennan-Ing b, Deanna Ware c, Sabina Haberlen d, James E Egan e, Andre L Brown e, Steven Meanley f, Valentina Stosor g, Steven Shoptaw h, M Reuel Friedman i,*, Michael Plankey j,*
PMCID: PMC9360198  NIHMSID: NIHMS1801238  PMID: 35138200

Abstract

Studies have shown that grit—defined as perseverance and passion for achieving one’s long-term goals—is associated with improved health outcomes, including lower levels of psychological distress. However, the psychometric properties of the original Grit Scale (Grit-O Scale) has not been validated among sexual minority men (SMM). The present study aimed to validate the Grit-O Scale among a sample of older SMM and assess the relationships between the Grit-O Scale factors and symptoms of psychological distress. We used data from a single visit of participants in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) Healthy Aging longitudinal study. The sample included 981 older SMM (mean age = 61, SD = 8.5) with and without HIV. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to identify the two factors of the Grit-O Scale: consistency of interest and perseverance of effort. We also conducted a latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify distinct profiles of psychological distress from self-reported scales of depression, anxiety, and perceived stress. The Grit-O Scale showed acceptable reliability estimates for the items with Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.82. The CFA identified the two factors of the Grit-O Scale with acceptable model fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.058 [95% CI = 0.050, 0.067], comparative fit index = 0.95, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.93, standardized root mean square residual = 0.07). The LPA yielded three mutually exclusive profiles of psychological distress (profile 1: low stress, anxiety, and depression; profile 2: high stress and depression and low anxiety; and profile 3: high stress, anxiety, and depression). In adjusted multinominal logistic regression analysis, we found that both higher levels of consistency of interest and perseverance of effort factors of the Grit-O Scale were significantly associated with decreased odds of being in profiles 2 and 3 compared with being in profile 1. Our findings support the use of the Grit-O Scale among older SMM. Grit factors could explain variability in the negative psychological symptoms among older SMM and warrant further investigation.

Keywords: Consistency of interests, Perseverance, Gay men, Aging, HIV, Mental Health

Introduction

Sexual minority men (SMM), including gay and bisexual men, experience higher levels of depression and anxiety symptoms compared with heterosexual men (Cochran & Mays, 2009; King et al., 2008; Pachankis, 2014). For SMM living with HIV, elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety have been associated with reduced adherence to antiretroviral therapy (Langebeek et al., 2014; Smith & Cook, 2019) and lower odds of HIV viral suppression (Aralis et al., 2018; Beer et al., 2016). Among SMM at risk for HIV, depression and anxiety symptoms negatively impact uptake and adherence to preexposure prophylaxis for HIV (Colson et al., 2020). Prior studies have focused on determining risk factors for depression and anxiety symptoms among SMM as an approach to inform development of preventive interventions (Hatzenbuehler et al., 2011; Mustanski et al., 2011). However, there is a need to explore innovative approaches to studying depression and anxiety outcomes among SMM that tap into existing strengths that protect against the development of depression and anxiety symptoms among SMM (Herrick et al., 2011, 2014). Therefore, research that identifies protective factors against depression and anxiety symptoms may inform interventions for improving the health and well-being of SMM with and without HIV.

Recently, there has been growing interest in how various personality traits influence health outcomes (Friedman & Kern, 2014; Huang et al., 2017; Stieger et al., 2021; Turiano et al., 2012). Grit is one personality trait that has continued to receive attention in the literature. Duckworth et al. defined grit as perseverance and passion for long-term goals (Duckworth et al., 2007a). Individuals with high grit demonstrate consistency of interests in future goals and with sustained effort over many years towards achieving those goals. In other words, individuals with high grit levels will approach life goals as a marathon, maintaining stamina in effort and interest in achieving life goals despite adversity (Duckworth et al., 2007a; Duckworth & Quinn, 2009). Grit has been closely linked to resilience, perseverance, and self-control. However, Duckworth et al. (2007) contended that grit is distinct from resilience—which entails an individual’s ability to “bounce back” after experiencing setbacks or adversity—by its emphasis on long-term commitment of interests. Moreover, resilience is described as a process of overcoming adversity (Herrick et al., 2014). Similarly, Duckworth et al. argued that grit differs from self-control in its emphasis on long-term stamina rather than short-term intensity, such that an individual can demonstrate self-control, but lack the stamina to maintain interest and perseverance toward achieving a long-term goal (Duckworth et al., 2007a).

Initial studies on grit found positive associations between high grit levels and various measures of success and performance (Duckworth et al., 2011; Duckworth & Quinn, 2009; Eskreis-Winkler et al., 2014; Maddi et al., 2012; Von Culin et al., 2014). Moreover, there has been growing interest in studying the impact of grit on psychological health outcomes. For instance, high levels of grit have been associated with lower depression and anxiety symptoms (Datu et al., 2019; Musumari et al., 2018; Sharkey et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2018), as well as lower levels of perceived stress (Kannangara et al., 2018; Lee, 2017; Meriac et al., 2015; Mullen & Crowe, 2018; Saunders-Scott et al., 2018). However, most of these studies on grit have focused on adolescents, young adults, and middle-aged samples, with few studies conducted among older adults and older SMM in particular. Grit could be a significant factor in how well SMM successfully age and maintain optimal psychological health outcomes. Older individuals in general experience age-related challenges in their physical, emotional, and psychological health because of age-related chronic disease conditions (Divo et al., 2014). SMM individuals experience health disparities in large part due to social stressors such as homophobic victimization, prejudice and discrimination because of their sexual minority status as proposed by the Minority Stress Theory (Meyer, 2003). Like other older adult groups, older SMM experience social isolation and reduced social support because of loss of family and friends (Mayer et al., 2021). In addition, older SMM face unique challenges from social stressors including long-term stigma and discrimination from family, friends, health care providers, and the community related to their age, sexual orientation, HIV serostatus, and race/ethnicity (Batchelder et al., 2017). These stressors, some of which have persisted over many years, have negative impacts on the psychological health outcomes of SMM. Despite this, research continues to show that not all older SMM experience negative outcomes (e.g., psychological health outcomes) as they age (Akhtar-Khaleel et al., 2015; Okafor et al., 2016; Pines et al., 2014; Wight et al., 2015, 2016). Therefore, it is important to study grit among older SMM who have faced persistent stigma and discrimination because such research can provide a means to understand why some SMM are able to overcome these adverse experiences and flourish, while some do not.

Grit has been most frequently measured using the self-reported 12-item original Grit Scale (Grit-O Scale), developed by Duckworth et al. (2007). The factor structure of the Grit-O Scale comprised two dimensions: consistency of interest and perseverance of effort. Consistency of interest refers to a person’s tendency to pursue the same goals and interests over time, whereas perseverance of effort is a person’s predisposition to sustain effort over time despite facing challenges. The Grit-O Scale was developed and validated among samples that were either predominantly middle age (mean age = 45 years) and female (73%−80 %) or military cadets (Duckworth et al., 2007a). Moreover, there have been inconsistencies in the dimensionality of the Grit-O Scale across samples. While some studies have found evidence for the two-factor solution, such as Duckworth et al. (2007) (Mullen & Crowe, 2018; Rhodes & Giovannetti, 2021), others have found a three-factor solution that included industriousness (i.e., the tendency for an individual to work very hard and diligently) (Kim & Lee, 2015). Furthermore, consistency of interest and perseverance of effort, though related, seem to have distinct associations with psychological health outcomes (Datu et al., 2016; Von Culin et al., 2014). For example, Datu and colleagues (Datu et al., 2016) found that perseverance of effort was negatively associated with negative affect, whereas, consistency of interest was positively associated with negative affect. To our knowledge, the Grit-O Scale has not been previously validated among SMM and whether the different factors of grit are associated with psychological health outcomes among SMM has not been explored.

The objectives of this analysis were to (1) validate the Grit Scale among a sample of older SMM and (2) assess the relationship between identified constructs from the Grit-O Scale with symptoms of psychological distress. We hypothesized that the Grit Scale would demonstrate a two-factor solution comprising consistency of interest and perseverance of effort and that both factors would be associated with lower levels of psychological health symptoms.

Methods

Study population

The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) is a longitudinal study that examines the natural and treated history of HIV/AIDS among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Baltimore, Maryland/Washington, DC; Chicago, Illinois; Los Angeles, California; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Since 1984, 7,352 HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants have enrolled over four time periods: 4,954 in 1984–1985, 668 in 1987–1991, 1,350 in 2001–2003, and 380 in 2011–2019. MACS participants attend semiannual visits that involve an audio computer-assisted self-interview, a standardized clinic examination, and blood and urine collections for laboratory measurements. Further details on the study design can be found elsewhere (Dudley et al., 1995; Kaslow et al., 1987). Study instruments can be found at http://www.mwccs.org.

Healthy Aging study

The Patterns of Healthy Aging Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Sub-study (hereafter, MACS Healthy Aging), was conducted to identify and understand psychosocial resiliency factors that contribute to healthy aging among older MSM with and without HIV infection (Egan et al., 2021). The sub-study was conducted over six semiannual waves (MACS visits 65–70), from April 2016 to March 2019. Participant inclusion criteria included being at least 40 years old on April 2016, reporting at least one sexual intercourse encounter with another man since enrolling in the MACS, and completing at least one MACS visit in the two years prior to April 2016. Current analyses used data collected from 981 MACS Healthy Aging participants at the wave 6 (i.e., MACS visit 70) visit (occurring between October 2018 and March 2019) who completed questions from the Grit Scale. Institutional review boards at each study site approved the MACS and Healthy Aging protocols, and informed consent was obtained from all participants (Egan et al., In Press). The analytic sample comprised 981 participants. The median age was 62 years (lower quartile=56; upper quartile=68). Most participants were non-Hispanic White (68.5%) and 42.7% completed some graduate work/graduate degree. Approximately one-third of the sample earned $60,000 or more per year (39.4%), were employed full-time (36.6%), and used marijuana in the past six months (33.4%). Half of the sample were living with HIV (49.5%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of MACS participants by HIV status

HIV status
Overall Positive (n = 486) Negative (n = 495) P-value
N % n % n %
Age, median (IQR), years 62 (56, 68)) 59 (54, 65) 65 (58, 70) <.0001
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White 672 68.5 271 55.8 401 81.0 <.0001
 Non-Hispanic Black 199 20.3 139 28.6 60 12.1
 Hispanic 91 9.3 65 13.4 26 5.3
 Other 19 1.9 11 2.3 8 1.6
Education
 High school or less 117 12.0 74 15.3 43 8.7 <.0001
 Some college 147 15.0 94 19.4 53 10.8
 College degree 296 30.3 147 30.4 149 30.2
 Some graduate work/graduate degree 417 42.7 169 34.9 248 50.3
Income
 <$19,999 204 22.1 139 29.9 65 14.2 <.0001
 $20,000-$59,999 356 38.5 189 40.6 167 36.4
 >$60,000 364 39.4 137 29.5 227 49.5
Site
 Baltimore, MD/Washington, DC 264 26.9 131 27.0 133 26.9 0.0005
 Chicago, IL 234 23.9 142 29.2 92 18.6
 Pittsburgh, PA 243 24.8 103 21.2 140 28.3
 Los Angeles, CA 240 24.5 110 22.6 130 26.3
Full-time employment
 No 616 63.4 310 64.2 306 62.6 0.6572
 Yes 356 36.6 173 35.8 183 37.4
Frailty phenotype
 No 811 87.7 399 87.7 412 87.7 0.9879
 Yes 114 12.3 56 12.3 58 12.3
Alcohol misuse (AUDIT-C)
 No 668 68.6 335 69.8 333 67.4 0.4232
 Yes 306 31.4 145 30.2 161 32.6
Smoking
 Never smoked 336 34.6 155 32.2 181 36.9 <.0001
 Former smoker 488 50.2 227 47.2 261 53.2
 Current smoker 148 15.2 99 20.6 49 10.0
Marijuana frequency
 Never 642 66.6 287 60.3 355 72.7 0.0002
 Less than daily 213 22.1 123 25.8 90 18.4
 Daily 109 11.3 66 13.9 43 8.8
Drug use
 No 851 88.8 394 83.5 457 94.0 <.0001
 Yes 107 11.2 78 16.5 29 6.0
Internalized homophobia
 No 585 71.3 277 67.9 308 74.6 0.0343
 Yes 236 28.7 131 32.1 105 25.4
Stigma, mean (SD) 0.11 (0.90) 0.16 (1.00) 0.06 (0.80) 0.0982

Abbreviations: AUDIT-C, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption; MACS, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study.

P-value from t test as distribution of scores was reasonably symmetric; all other p-values were from a χ2 test.

Measures

Grit

We measured grit using the 12-item Grit-O Scale that measures the degree to which individuals can persevere in effort and maintain focus in the pursuit of long-term goals (Duckworth et al., 2007a). The Grit Scale includes items such as “I have achieved a goal that took years of work” and “I have overcome setbacks to conquer an important challenge,” which measure perseverance of effort. Examples of items that measure consistency of interest include “I often set a goal but later choose to pursue a different one” and “my interests change from year to year.” Response options were on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 = very much like me to 5 = not like me at all. All items for the consistency of interest subscale were reverse-coded.

Symptoms of psychological distress

Depression symptoms

Depression symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) (Radloff, 1977). The CES-D is a 20-item measure that asks participants to rate how often over the past two weeks they experienced symptoms associated with depression. Response options range from 0 to 3 for each item (0 = rarely or none of the time, 1 = some or little of the time, 2 = moderately or much of the time, and 3 = most or almost all the time). Responses for the 20 items are summed, with scores ranging from 0 to 60 and higher scores indicating greater depression symptoms. Cronbach’s alpha for the CES-D was 0.82.

Anxiety symptoms

Anxiety symptoms were assessed using the General Anxiety Disorder–7 (GAD-7) scale (Spitzer et al., 2006). The GAD-7 is a 7-item measure that asks participants how often over the past two weeks they experienced anxiety symptoms. Response options range from 0 = not at all; 1 = several days; 2 = more than half the days; and 3 = nearly every day. Responses for the 7 items are summed, with scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms. Cronbach’s alpha for the GAD-7 was 0.92.

Perceived stress

The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was used to measure the degree in which situations in a participant’s life are appraised as stressful (Cohen et al., 1983). The 10-item PSS (PSS-10) was used in this study. Response options range from 0 = never; 1 = almost never; 2 = sometimes; 3 = fairly often; and 4 = very often. Responses for the 7 items are summed (some items were reverse coded), with total scores ranging from 0 to 40 and higher scores indicating greater perceived stress. Cronbach’s alpha for the PSS-10 was 0.86.

Covariates of symptoms of psychological distress

To minimize potential confounding, our models included several sociodemographic, clinical, physical, and psychosocial factors that have been previously identified as important drivers of psychological health symptoms among older adults and SMM, including sociodemographic factors, HIV serostatus (Batchelder et al., 2017), substance use particularly stimulant use (Javanbakht et al., 2020), frailty phenotype (Desquilbet et al., 2009), internalized homophobia (Newcomb & Mustanski, 2010), and stigma (Marti-Pastor et al., 2020).

Sociodemographic characteristics

Race/ethnicity was self-reported and categorized into (1) non-Hispanic White; (2) non-Hispanic Black; (3) Hispanic; and (4) other (American Indian, Asian, and Pacific Islander). Education was self-reported and categorized into (1) high school or less; (2) some college; (3) college degree; and (4) some or completed graduate education. Participants reporting any part-time, full-time, or self-employment were classified as being employed, otherwise participants were considered not employed. Income was self-reported and categorized into (1) less than $19,999; (2) $20,000-$59,999; and (3) $60,000 or more.

HIV serostatus

HIV status (HIV-positive/HIV-negative) was assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a confirmatory Western blot on all MACS participants at their baseline visit and at every visit for HIV-negative participants. HIV-positive participants include those who tested as such at baseline or seroconverted during study observation (S. P. Meanley et al., 2020).

Substance use

The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption questionnaire (AUDIT-C) was used to measure alcohol misuse. The AUDIT-C has three questions with answer choices from 0 points to 4 points. Scores for all three questions are summed. Alcohol misuse was defined as an AUDIT-C score ≥ 4 which indicates patients with hazardous drinking or who have active alcohol use disorders (Bush et al., 1998). Smoking status was self-reported, and current (i.e., past six months) smoking status was categorized into three groups: never smoked, former smoker, and current smoker. Frequency of marijuana use was self-reported and categorized as no use, less than daily, and daily use. Illicit drug use was measured as a positive (i.e., yes response) to any use of cocaine/crack, uppers, heroin, downers, ethyl, PCP, and GHB in the past six months.

Frailty phenotype

Frailty was defined in the MACS as the presence of three or more of the following components: (1) weakness (present if grip strength measured using a dynamometer is less than 20th percentile of HIV-negative men); (2) slowness (present if time to walk 4 m is more than 80th percentile of HIV-negative men); (3) unintentional weight loss (present if participant answers yes to the question “Since your last visit, have you had unintentional weight loss of at least 10 lbs?”); (4) exhaustion (present if participant answers yes to the question “During the past 4 weeks, as a result of your physical health, have you had difficulty performing your work or other activities [for example, it took extra effort]?”); and (5) low physical activity (present if participant answers yes, limited a lot to the question “Does your health now limit you in vigorous activities, such as running, lifting heavy objects, participating in strenuous sports?”) (Althoff et al., 2014; Desquilbet et al., 2009; Fried et al., 2001).

Psychosocial characteristics

Internalized homophobia

Internalized homophobia was measured using the Internalized Homophobia Scale (Herek et al., 1998). Participants were asked to retrospectively “think about the period of time when you first realized you were attracted to other men” and subsequently answer 9 statements about sexuality and indicate their level of agreement. Example statements include: “I would like to get professional help in order to change my sexual orientation from gay/bisexual to straight”. Items were scored using a five-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). We created a binary (yes/no) variable of internalized homophobia by assigning a yes to participants who responded with agree or strongly agree with any of the 9 items similar to previous published reports (Herrick et al., 2013; Meanley et al., 2020).

Perceived stigma

Perceived stigma related to being a sexual minority individual was assessed with four questions, developed by the Healthy Aging Study team, that asked perceptions of stigma from people, family, gay community, and health care providers (Egan et al., 2021). Sample questions asked included “I feel that health care providers treat me with [response options] respect because I have sex with men.” Response options ranged from a lot more, a little more, not applicable, about the same, a little less, and a lot less, with scores for each item assigned as −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. We created a composite summary score by summing all items, with higher scores reflecting more perceptions of stigma.

Data analysis

To validate the grit scale among a sample of older SMM, we conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using responses from the Grit-O Scale. In their study, Duckworth et al. (2007) compared a unidimensional model with a two-factor model, with correlated factors, and found better model fit indices for a two-factor model. Thus, in this study, we considered a two–correlated factor model composed of the two Grit subscales: consistency of interest and perseverance of effort. We specified items to load onto their a priori constructs outlined in the original study by Duckworth and colleagues (2007). Due to the sufficiently large sample size and the grit items having five response categories, we assumed the responses to be normally distributed (Gunzler & Morris, 2015; Rhemtulla et al., 2012). Therefore, grit items were treated as continuous, and we used robust maximum likelihood estimation in the CFA modeling strategy. We used root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), comparative fit index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) to assess model fit. We assessed good model fit as RMSEA < 0.06 (with upper limit of the confidence value <0.08), CFI/TLI > 0.90, and SRMR < 0.08 (Browne & Cudeck, 1992; Hu & Bentler, 1999).

Next, we assessed the relationship between identified factors from the Grit-O Scale with psychological health symptoms. To address this, we first conducted a latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify mutually exclusive profiles of psychological distress based on participants’ responses to the CES-D, GAD-7, and PSS-10. LPA is an analytic approach analogous to latent class analysis that allows for the identification of categorical latent factors from continuous observed variables (Collins & Lanza, 2009). To identify the optimal number of latent profiles, we conducted sequential models testing whether 2, 3, and 4 latent profiles of psychological distress best fit the data. We used the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), sample size–adjusted BIC (SABIC), Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test (LMR LRT), adjusted LMR LRT, and entropy to assess model fit. Lower AIC, BIC, and SABIC scores indicate better model fit. The LMR LRT and adjusted LMR LRT compare a model with k profiles vs another with k-1 profiles, with a statistically nonsignificant p-value indicating that the k-1 model fits the data better than the k model. Entropy—a measure of classification uncertainty—values ≥ 0.70 indicate model fit (Jung & Wickrama, 2008). In addition, we examined the prevalence of each latent profile (retaining models where the smallest class contained more than 5% of the sample) and interpretability of the identified latent profiles. After the optimal number of latent profiles were selected, we used χ2 statistics, independent t tests, and Wilcoxon tests to compare sociodemographic, clinical, physical, and psychosocial factors of the latent profiles of psychological distress. We then used a multinomial logistic regression model to assess associations of the identified grit constructs from the CFA and the latent profile of psychological distress. The primary independent variable in these models was the identified grit constructs and the dependent variable was the latent profile of psychological distress. For this analysis, we selected the profile with the lowest symptoms of psychological distress as the referent group. Covariates were selected for inclusion in the adjusted models if their p-values for their association with latent profile of psychological distress were < 0.10. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratio, with 95% CIs are reported. Missing data on specific covariates ranged from 2% to 16%. We addressed missing data with multiple imputation using chained equations (White et al., 2011). Ten imputed datasets were generated for missing data, multinomial logistic regression models were conducted on each imputed data set, and odds ratios were pooled (Toutenburg, 1990). We used Mplus version 8.5 to conduct the CFA and LPA. We used SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA) to conduct the multinomial multiple imputation and logistic regression.

Results

Results from the CFA measurement model of the Grit-O Scale

The overall Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients of each factor yielded the following results: α = 0.82 for consistency of interest and 0.83 for the perseverance of effort. Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients for items ranged from 0.77 to 0.80 for consistency of interest and 0.77 to 0.82 for perseverance of effort. The initial CFA with correlated factors fit the data moderately well (RMSEA = 0.079 [95% CI = 0.072, 0.087], CFI = 0.89, TLI = 0.87, SRMR = 0.08). Because the two factors were allowed to correlate in the initial CFA model, in subsequent CFA models, we allowed correlation of item error variances (see Figure 1 for measurement model of Grit Scale). The final CFA model with correlated factors and item variances produced an acceptable fit to the data (RMSEA = 0.058 [95% CI = 0.050, 0.067]), CFI = 0.95, TLI = 0.93, SRMR = 0.07). All factor loadings were >0.5 (ranging from 0.52 to 0.85) and statistically significant (Table 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Confirmatory factor analysis of the Grit Scale. Standardized coefficients are displayed. All coefficients were significant at p<0.05. Model fit information: root mean square error of approximation = 0.058, comparative fit index = 0.95, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.93, standardized root mean square residual = 0.07. Abbreviations= pf=Perseverance of effort; ci= consistency of interest

Table 2.

Factor loadings and Cronbach’s α from the two-factor solution of the grit scale

Factor loadings Cronbach’s α
Items Perseverance of effort Consistency of interest
G14. I have achieved a goal that took years of work. 0.66 0.82
G2. I have overcome setbacks to conquer an important challenge. 0.66 0.81
G11. I finish whatever I begin. 0.59 0.81
G6. Setbacks don’t discourage me. 0.57 0.82
G8. I am a hard worker. 0.64 0.80
G17. I am diligent. 0.85 0.78
G9. I often set a goal but later choose to pursue a different one. 0.77 0.78
G3. New ideas and projects sometimes distract me from previous ones. 0.58 0.81
G16. I become interested in new pursuits every few months. 0.52 0.82
G5. My interests change from year to year. 0.68 0.79
G7. I have been obsessed with a certain idea or project for a short time but later lost interest. 0.74 0.79
G10. I have difficulty maintaining my focus on projects that take more than a few months to complete. 0.73 0.79

Note: All factor loadings were statistically significant (p<0.05)

Results from LPA of symptoms of psychological distress

Supplemental Table S1 shows model fit information for 1 to 4 profiles of psychological distress from the CES-D, GAD-7, and PSS-10. The three-class solution was selected because the LMR LRT and adjusted LMR LRT comparing the four-class with the three-class solution was statistically insignificant (p = 0.241 and 0.251 for LMR LRT and adjusted LMR LRT, respectively) indicating that the four-class was not a better fit than the three-class solution. Entropy for the three-class was 0.90. The classification probabilities for the most likely latent profile are displayed in Supplemental Table S2. The three mutually exclusive latent profiles emerging from this solution comprise profile 1 (n = 706; 67%) characterized by participants with mean GAD-7, PSS-10, and CES-D scores of 1.22, 9.43, and 4.47; profile 2 (n = 89; 9%) participants with mean GAD-7, PSS-10, and CES-D scores of 15.78, 23.24, and 31.80; and profile 3 (n = 256; 24%) participants with mean GAD-7, PSS-10, and CES-D of 6.43, 22.18, and 39.55, respectively (Supplemental Table S3). Thus, we describe participants in profile 1 as having no/low psychological distress, participants in profile 2 as experiencing significant psychological distress (i.e., high scores on CES-D, GAD-7, and PSS-10), and participants in profile 3 as having significant depression and stress symptoms but low anxiety symptoms (i.e., high scores on CES-D and PSS-10, but low scores on GAD-7).

Characteristics of sample by latent profile of symptoms of psychological distress

The mean age was lowest among those in profile 2 (mean age = 57 years). Compared with participants with profile 1, those with profiles 2 and 3 had higher proportions of frailty phenotypes (8.6% vs 17.7% and 20.7%), current smokers (12.6% vs 23.8% and 19.3%), daily marijuana use (9.4% vs 20.5% and 13.3%), self-reported internalized homophobia (20.8% vs 50.7% and 43.5%), and positive HIV status (46.7% vs 64.3% and 52.0%; supplemental Table S4). Overall, age, race/ethnicity, education status, annual income, frailty phenotype, stigma, smoking status, frequency of marijuana use, illicit drug use, internalized homophobia, and HIV status were statistically significantly associated with latent profile of psychological distress (all p values ≤ 0.05) and were considered for inclusion in the multivariable model.

Multivariable multinomial logistic regression of associations between Grit-O subscales and latent profile of symptoms of psychological distress

We selected profile 1 as the referent group for the multinomial logistic regression analysis because it comprised participants with the lowest symptoms of psychological distress. We did not include education in the final model because of multicollinearity with income. Each unit increase in the consistency of interest factor was associated with decreased odds of being in profile 2 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.49, 0.84) and profile 3 (AOR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.55, 0.79) compared with being in profile 1 (Table 3). Similarly, each additional unit increase in the perseverance of effort factor was associated with lower odds of a being in profile 2 (AOR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.40, 0.69) and profile 3 (AOR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.52, 0.75) compared with being in profile 1. These findings were in the context of other significant covariates of latent profiles of psychological distress including older age, internalized homophobia, perceived stigma, and frailty phenotype (all p-values=<0.01; Table 3).

Table 3.

Adjusted odds ratios from multinomial logistic regression association of grit factors with latent profile of distress

Profile 2 (vs profile 1) Profile 3 (vs profile 1)
AOR (95% CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P-value
Age 0.92 (0.89, 0.95) <0.001 0.95 (0.92, 0.96) <0.001
Race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White Reference Reference
 Non-Hispanic Black 0.42 (0.22, 0.80) 0.007 0.63 (0.42, 0.96) 0.032
 Hispanic 1.18 (0.61, 2.31) 0.611 0.74 (0.45, 1.23) 0.250
 Other 1.26 (0.37, 4.31) 0.708 1.65 (0.74, 3.68) 0.217
Income
 <$19,999 Reference Reference
 $20,000-$59,999 1.17 (0.83, 1.66) 0.368 0.83 (0.66, 1.07) 0.153
 >$60,000 0.61 (0.40, 0.94) 0.023 0.90 (0.70, 1.18) 0.449
Internalized homophobia
 No Reference Reference
 Yes 1.84 (1.33, 2.55) <0.001 1.67 (1.38, 2.02) <0.001
Stigma 1.42 (1.09, 1.85) 0.008 1.21 (1.01, 1.45) 0.036
Frailty phenotype 
 No Reference Reference
 Yes 1.71 (1.17, 2.51) 0.005 1.85 (1.45, 2.38) <0.001
HIV status
 Negative Reference Reference
 Positive 1.09 (0.83, 1.43) 0.517 0.95 (0.80, 1.13) 0.593
Factors
 Consistency of interest 0.64 (0.49, 0.84) 0.001 0.65 (0.55, 0.79) <0.001
 Perseverance of effort 0.52 (0.40, 0.69) <0.001 0.62 (0.52, 0.75) <0.001

Abbreviation: AOR, adjusted odds ratio.

Discussion

The aims of this study were to assess the psychometric validity of the grit scale in a sample of older SMM with and without HIV and to explore relationships between identified subscales from the Grit-O Scale with psychological health symptoms. Consistent with our hypothesis, a CFA produced a two-factor solution in which items loaded onto respective factors: consistency of interest and perseverance of effort with acceptable model fit statistics. Furthermore, we found that both higher consistency of interest and perseverance of effort were associated with reduced odds of having symptoms of psychological distress, independent of other important correlates of psychological distress including age, internalized homophobia, perceived stigma, and frailty phenotype.

To our knowledge, our study is among the first to assess the psychometric properties of the Grit-O Scale in older SMM with and without HIV. The internal consistency measures of the items of the Grit-O scale in this study of SMM were acceptable and were consistent with the values produced in the Grit-O Scale in the Duckworth et al. study (Duckworth et al., 2007a) and comparable with other studies in diverse populations (Arco-Tirado et al., 2018; van Zyl et al., 2020) including those conducted among older adults (Kim & Lee, 2015; Rhodes & Giovannetti, 2021). For example, Kim and Lee (2015) used the Grit-O Scale among older individuals in Korea and produced a three-factor solution with comparable reliability estimates: consistency of interest (0.79), perseverance of effort (0.76), and industriousness (0.84). As such, reliability estimates from our study indicated the stability of the items from the Grit-O Scale among this sample of older SMM. Regarding the component structure of the Grit-O Scale in this sample of older SMM, our CFA model indicated that the data fit a two-factor solution that map to the two constructs identified by Duckworth and colleagues in the original validation of the Grit-O Scale, with acceptable model fit statistics. Our study findings were also consistent with another study among older adults in the United States that found a two-factor solution using the short grit scale comprising 10 items (5 items loading on each factor) (Rhodes & Giovannetti, 2021). However, our study findings are inconsistent with one study among older adults in Korea using the Grit-O Scale to produce a three-factor solution consisting of an additional factor of industriousness (Kim & Lee, 2015). Cultural differences between older adults in Korea and North America could explain the different model solutions. The result of our analysis supports the use of the Grit-O Scale to produce separate scores for the two grit factors: consistency of interest and perseverance of effort among older SMM.

For the second aim of this study, we found that both consistency of interest and perseverance of effort were associated with decreased odds of having a profile of elevated psychological distress. These findings are independent of other covariates of psychological distress, particularly older age, internalized homophobia, perceived stigma, and frailty phenotype which were all statistically significant in the multivariable models. Our findings added to the growing literature demonstrating the protective associations between measures of grit and psychological well-being (Laird et al., 2019; Sharkey et al., 2018). Our findings were consistent with previous studies among SMM and persons with HIV. Those studies showed that higher levels of grit were associated with lower depression symptoms (Winiker et al., 2019) and prevalence of current major depressive disorder (Moore et al., 2018), although these studies did not explore the psychometric properties of the Grit-O Scale, but scored the grit scale by summing the grit items. Our findings expanded the literature by demonstrating a protective association between the two grit factors and symptoms of psychological distress among this sample of older SMM.

Our finding that both grit factors were associated with lower odds of psychological distress are particularly noteworthy among SMM. SMM often experience persistent stigma and discrimination, which results in significant symptoms of psychological distress that have negative downstream impact on other health domains (Smit et al., 2012; Valdiserri et al., 2019; Wight et al., 2012). Our finding suggested that a high grit personality trait characterized by passion and perseverance for long-term goals could be a strength that some older SMM in this sample use to mitigate psychological distress. As such, grit could be a factor that explains variability in the negative psychological impact of stigma, discrimination, and other traumatic experiences among older SMM. Findings from our study should serve as a foundation for future research on grit among older SMM towards facilitating intervention development. However, additional investigations are needed to replicate these findings among other samples of older SMM. It will also be important to document whether the protective associations of grit on psychological distress will be observed in other relevant domains of successful aging (e.g., physical, and cognitive health) and HIV-related health outcomes (e.g., antiretroviral therapy adherence). Moreover, studies that identify the mediational process whereby grit leads to protective psychological health are warranted. Although a growing number of studies have demonstrated that other personality trait types, such as neuroticism, extraversion, conscientiousness, and agreeableness can be changed through intervention (Magidson et al., 2014; Roberts et al., 2017; Stieger et al., 2021). For instance, one systematic review found increases in extraversion, conscientiousness as well as reduction in neuroticism of small to medium effect sizes via a broad range of intervention types (Roberts et al., 2017). However, relatively few studies have assessed strategies to promote grit via grit-focused interventions (Hwang & Nam, 2021). Cognitive behavioral strategies that focus on interest discovery and maintenance, facilitating goal setting, deliberate practice, and cultivating a growth mindset—i.e., the belief that one’s abilities can improve with effort (Hwang & Nam, 2021)—could serve to increase grit in older SMM groups.

Our study had some limitations. Our analysis was cross-sectional, and we were not able to make definitive conclusions about the direction of the grit-psychological distress association. The measures used in our study were obtained via self-report, creating the potential for reporting bias from participants. This issue is particularly relevant for the Grit Scale because items from the Grit Scale represent positive traits; it is possible participants may not have provided accurate responses due to the socially desirable nature of having positive traits. Additionally, we used a convenience sample of older SMM from the MACS. As such, our sample was predominantly non-Hispanic White with a higher degree of education. Thus, it is unclear how generalizable our findings will be in other SMM groups.

Despite these limitations, our results showed acceptable psychometric properties of the grit scale among this sample of older SMM with and without HIV. Further, the two factors of grit—consistency of interest and perseverance of effort—demonstrated protective associations with psychological distress. Our findings support the use of the Grit-O Scale for the assessment of the two grit factors among older SMM. This study did not measure the Big Five personality traits, precluding assessment of correlation between the Grit-O subscales with Big Five personality traits. Additional studies are needed to replicate these findings. Furthermore, future research that explores mediational pathways linking grit to better psychological health among older SMM with and without HIV is warranted. Investigations that use a longitudinal design and demographically diverse sample would be useful for these investigations.

Supplementary Material

Supp 1

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by the National Institute for Minority Health Disparities (grant R01 MD010680; Plankey & Friedman). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). MWCCS (Principal Investigators): Atlanta CRS (Ighovwerha Ofotokun, Anandi Sheth, and Gina Wingood), U01-HL146241; Baltimore CRS (Todd Brown and Joseph Margolick), U01-HL146201; Bronx CRS (Kathryn Anastos and Anjali Sharma), U01-HL146204; Brooklyn CRS (Deborah Gustafson and Tracey Wilson), U01-HL146202; Data Analysis and Coordination Center (Gypsyamber D’Souza, Stephen Gange, and Elizabeth Golub), U01-HL146193; Chicago–Cook County CRS (Mardge Cohen and Audrey French), U01-HL146245; Chicago-Northwestern CRS (Steven Wolinsky), U01-HL146240; Connie Wofsy Women’s HIV Study, Northern California CRS (Bradley Aouizerat, Phyllis Tien, and Jennifer Price), U01-HL146242; Los Angeles CRS (Roger Detels), U01-HL146333; Metropolitan Washington CRS (Seble Kassaye and Daniel Merenstein), U01-HL146205; Miami CRS (Maria Alcaide, Margaret Fischl, and Deborah Jones), U01-HL146203; Pittsburgh CRS (Jeremy Martinson and Charles Rinaldo), U01-HL146208; UAB-MS CRS (Mirjam-Colette Kempf, Jodie Dionne-Odom, and Deborah Konkle-Parker), U01-HL146192; UNC CRS (Adaora Adimora), U01-HL146194. The MWCCS is funded primarily by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), with additional co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD), National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), and in coordination and alignment with the research priorities of the NIH, Office of AIDS Research (OAR). MWCCS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000004 (UCSF CTSA), P30-AI-050409 (Atlanta CFAR), P30-AI-050410 (UNC CFAR), and P30-AI-027767 (UAB CFAR).

The authors are indebted to the participants of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) Healthy Aging Study. The authors thank the staff at the four sites for implementation support John Welty, Montserrat Tarrago, and Katherine McGowan for data support of this study.

References

  1. Akhtar-Khaleel WZ, Cook RL, Shoptaw S, Surkan P, Stall R, Beyth RJ, Teplin LA, & Plankey M. (2015). Trends and Predictors of Cigarette Smoking Among HIV Seropositive and Seronegative Men: The Multicenter Aids Cohort Study. AIDS and Behavior. 10.1007/s10461-015-1099-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Althoff KN, Jacobson LP, Cranston RD, Detels R, Phair JP, Li X, Margolick JB, & Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). (2014). Age, comorbidities, and AIDS predict a frailty phenotype in men who have sex with men. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 69(2), 189–198. 10.1093/gerona/glt148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aralis HJ, Shoptaw S, Brookmeyer R, Ragsdale A, Bolan R, & Gorbach PM (2018). Psychiatric Illness, Substance Use, and Viral Suppression Among HIV-Positive Men of Color Who Have Sex with Men in Los Angeles. AIDS and Behavior, 22(10), 3117–3129. 10.1007/s10461-018-2055-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arco-Tirado JL, Fernández-Martín FD, & Hoyle RH (2018). Development and Validation of a Spanish Version of the Grit-S Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Batchelder AW, Safren S, Mitchell AD, Ivardic I, & O’Cleirigh C. (2017). Mental health in 2020 for men who have sex with men in the United States. Sexual Health, 14(1), 59–71. 10.1071/SH16083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beer L, Mattson CL, Bradley H, & Skarbinski J. (2016). Understanding Cross-Sectional Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Antiretroviral Use and Viral Suppression Among HIV Patients in the United States. Medicine, 95(13). 10.1097/MD.0000000000003171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Browne MW, & Cudeck R. (1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. 10.1177/0049124192021002005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, & Bradley KA (1998). The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789–1795. 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cochran SD, & Mays VM (2009). Burden of psychiatric morbidity among lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in the California Quality of Life Survey. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(3), 647–658. 10.1037/a0016501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen S, Kamarck T, & Mermelstein R. (1983). A Global Measure of Perceived Stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. 10.2307/2136404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Collins LM, & Lanza ST (2009). Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis: With Applications in the Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  12. Colson PW, Franks J, Wu Y, Winterhalter FS, Knox J, Ortega H, El-Sadr WM, & Hirsch-Moverman Y. (2020). Adherence to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in Black Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in a Community Setting in Harlem, NY. AIDS and Behavior, 24(12), 3436–3455. 10.1007/s10461-020-02901-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Datu JAD, King RB, Valdez JPM, & Eala MSM (2019). Grit is Associated with Lower Depression via Meaning in Life among Filipino High School Students. Youth & Society, 51(6), 865–876. 10.1177/0044118X18760402 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Datu JAD, Valdez JPM, & King RB (2016). Perseverance Counts but Consistency Does Not! Validating the Short Grit Scale in a Collectivist Setting. Current Psychology, 35(1), 121–130. 10.1007/s12144-015-9374-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Desquilbet L, Margolick JB, Fried LP, Phair JP, Jamieson BD, Holloway M, & Jacobson LP (2009). Relationship between a frailty-related phenotype and progressive deterioration of the immune system in HIV-infected men. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 50(3), 299–306. 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181945eb0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Divo MJ, Martinez CH, & Mannino DM (2014). Ageing and the epidemiology of multimorbidity. European Respiratory Journal, 44(4), 1055–1068. 10.1183/09031936.00059814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Duckworth AL, Kirby TA, Tsukayama E, Berstein H, & Ericsson KA (2011). Deliberate Practice Spells Success: Why Grittier Competitors Triumph at the National Spelling Bee. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(2), 174–181. 10.1177/1948550610385872 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, & Kelly DR (2007a). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, & Kelly DR (2007b). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Duckworth AL, & Quinn PD (2009). Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. 10.1080/00223890802634290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dudley J, Jin S, Hoover D, Metz S, Thackeray R, & Chmiel J. (1995). The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study: Retention after 9½ Years. American Journal of Epidemiology, 142(3), 323–330. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Egan JE, Haberlen SA, Meanley S, Ware D, Brown AL, Siconolfi D, Brennan-Ing M, Stall R, Plankey MW, & Friedman MR (2021). Understanding Patterns of Healthy Aging Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Protocol for an Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Research Protocols, 10(9), e25750. 10.2196/25750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Egan JE, Haberlen S, Meanley S, Ware D, Brown A, Siconolfi D, Brennan-Ing M, Stall R, Plankey MW, & Friedman MR (In Press). Understanding Patterns of Healthy Aging Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: Study Methods. JMIR Preprints. https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/25750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Eskreis-Winkler L, Duckworth AL, Shulman EP, & Beal S. (2014). The grit effect: Predicting retention in the military, the workplace, school and marriage. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA, & Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. (2001). Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(3), M146–156. 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Friedman HS, & Kern ML (2014). Personality, Well-Being, and Health. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 719–742. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gunzler DD, & Morris N. (2015). A tutorial on structural equation modeling for analysis of overlapping symptoms in co-occurring conditions using MPlus. Statistics in Medicine, 34(24), 3246–3280. 10.1002/sim.6541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hatzenbuehler ML, O’Cleirigh C, Mayer KH, Mimiaga MJ, & Safren SA (2011). Prospective Associations Between HIV-Related Stigma, Transmission Risk Behaviors, and Adverse Mental Health Outcomes in Men Who Have Sex with Men. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42(2), 227–234. 10.1007/s12160-011-9275-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herek GM, D P, Cogan JC, D P, Gillis JR, D P, Glunt EK, & D P. (1998). Correlates of internalized homophobia in a community sample of lesbians and gay men. Journal of the Gay and Lesbian Medical Association, 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  30. Herrick AL, Lim SH, Wei C, Smith H, Guadamuz T, Friedman MS, & Stall R. (2011). Resilience as an untapped resource in behavioral intervention design for gay men. AIDS and Behavior, 15 Suppl 1, S25–29. 10.1007/s10461-011-9895-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Herrick AL, Stall R, Chmiel JS, Guadamuz TE, Penniman T, Shoptaw S, Ostrow D, & Plankey MW (2013). It Gets Better: Resolution of Internalized Homophobia Over Time and Associations with Positive Health Outcomes Among MSM. AIDS and Behavior, 17(4), 1423–1430. 10.1007/s10461-012-0392-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Herrick AL, Stall R, Goldhammer H, Egan JE, & Mayer KH (2014). Resilience as a research framework and as a cornerstone of prevention research for gay and bisexual men: Theory and evidence. AIDS and Behavior, 18(1), 1–9. 10.1007/s10461-012-0384-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hu L, & Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. 10.1080/10705519909540118 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Huang I-C, Lee JL, Ketheeswaran P, Jones CM, Revicki DA, & Wu AW (2017). Does personality affect health-related quality of life? A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 12(3). 10.1371/journal.pone.0173806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hwang M-H, & Nam JK (2021). Enhancing Grit: Possibility and Intervention Strategies. In van Zyl LE, Olckers C, & van der Vaart L. (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Grit: Contemporary Theories, Assessments, Applications and Critiques (pp. 77–93). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-57389-8_5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Javanbakht M, Shoptaw S, Ragsdale A, Brookmeyer R, Bolan R, & Gorbach PM (2020). Depressive symptoms and substance use: Changes overtime among a cohort of HIV-positive and HIV-negative MSM. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 207, 107770. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jung T, & Wickrama K. a. S. (2008). An Introduction to Latent Class Growth Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302–317. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kannangara CS, Allen RE, Waugh G, Nahar N, Khan SZN, Rogerson S, & Carson J. (2018). All That Glitters Is Not Grit: Three Studies of Grit in University Students. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. KASLOW RA, OSTROW DG, DETELS R, PHAIR JP, POLK BF, RINALDO CR Jr., & FOR THE MULTICENTER AIDS COHORT STUDY. (1987). THE MULTICENTER AIDS COHORT STUDY: RATIONALE, ORGANIZATION, AND SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PARTICIPANTS. American Journal of Epidemiology, 126(2), 310–318. 10.1093/aje/126.2.310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim YJ, & Lee CS (2015). Effects of Grit on the Successful Aging of the Elderly in Korea. 10.17485/IJST/2015/V8IS7/70421 [DOI]
  41. King M, Semlyen J, Tai SS, Killaspy H, Osborn D, Popelyuk D, & Nazareth I. (2008). A systematic review of mental disorder, suicide, and deliberate self harm in lesbian, gay and bisexual people. BMC Psychiatry, 8(1), 70. 10.1186/1471-244X-8-70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Laird KT, Lavretsky H, Paholpak P, Vlasova RM, Roman M, Cyr NS, & Siddarth P. (2019). Clinical correlates of resilience factors in geriatric depression. International Psychogeriatrics, 31(2), 193–202. 10.1017/S1041610217002873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Langebeek N, Gisolf EH, Reiss P, Vervoort SC, Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Richter C, Sprangers MA, & Nieuwkerk PT (2014). Predictors and correlates of adherence to combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) for chronic HIV infection: A meta-analysis. BMC Medicine, 12(1), 142. 10.1186/s12916-014-0142-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee WWS (2017). Relationships among grit, academic performance, perceived academic failure, and stress in associate degree students. Journal of Adolescence, 60, 148–152. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.08.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Maddi SR, Matthews MD, Kelly DR, Villarreal B, & White M. (2012). The role of hardiness and grit in predicting performance and retention of USMA cadets. Military Psychology, 24(1), 19–28. 10.1080/08995605.2012.639672 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Magidson JF, Roberts B, Collado-Rodriguez A, & Lejuez CW (2014). Theory-Driven Intervention for Changing Personality: Expectancy Value Theory, Behavioral Activation, and Conscientiousness. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1442–1450. 10.1037/a0030583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Marti-Pastor M, Ferrer M, Alonso J, Garin O, Pont A, Flynn C, & German D. (2020). Association of Enacted Stigma with Depressive Symptoms Among Gay and Bisexual Men Who Have Sex with Men: Baltimore, 2011 and 2014. LGBT Health, 7(1), 47–59. 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0230 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mayer KH, Nelson L, Hightow-Weidman L, Mimiaga MJ, Mena L, Reisner S, Daskalakis D, Safren SA, Beyrer C, & Sullivan PS (2021). The persistent and evolving HIV epidemic in American men who have sex with men. The Lancet, 397(10279), 1116–1126. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00321-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Meanley S, Haberlen SA, Okafor CN, Brown A, Brennan-Ing M, Ware D, Egan JE, Teplin LA, Bolan RK, Friedman MR, & Plankey MW (2020). Lifetime Exposure to Conversion Therapy and Psychosocial Health Among Midlife and Older Adult Men Who Have Sex With Men. The Gerontologist, 60(7), 1291–1302. 10.1093/geront/gnaa069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Meanley SP, Stall RD, Dakwar O, Egan JE, Friedman MR, Haberlen SA, Okafor C, Teplin LA, & Plankey MW (2020). Characterizing Experiences of Conversion Therapy Among Middle-Aged and Older Men Who Have Sex with Men from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS). Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 17(2), 334–342. 10.1007/s13178-019-00396-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Meriac JP, Slifka JS, & LaBat LR (2015). Work ethic and grit: An examination of empirical redundancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 401–405. 10.1016/j.paid.2015.07.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Meyer IH (2003). Prejudice, Social Stress, and Mental Health in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations: Conceptual Issues and Research Evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Moore RC, Hussain MA, Watson CW-M, Fazeli PL, Marquine MJ, Yarns BC, Jeste DV, & Moore DJ (2018). Grit and ambition are associated with better neurocognitive and everyday functioning among adults infected with HIV. AIDS and Behavior, 22(10), 3214–3225. 10.1007/s10461-018-2061-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mullen PR, & Crowe A. (2018). A Psychometric Investigation of the Short Grit Scale With a Sample of School Counselors. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(3), 151–162. 10.1080/07481756.2018.1435194 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mustanski BS, Newcomb ME, Bois SND, Garcia SC, & Grov C. (2011). HIV in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Review of Epidemiology, Risk and Protective Factors, and Interventions. The Journal of Sex Research, 48(2–3), 218–253. 10.1080/00224499.2011.558645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Musumari PM, Tangmunkongvorakul A, Srithanaviboonchai K, Techasrivichien T, Suguimoto SP, Ono-Kihara M, & Kihara M. (2018). Grit is associated with lower level of depression and anxiety among university students in Chiang Mai, Thailand: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 13(12). 10.1371/journal.pone.0209121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Newcomb ME, & Mustanski B. (2010). Internalized homophobia and internalizing mental health problems: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(8), 1019–1029. 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Okafor CN, Cook RL, Chen X, Surkan PJ, Becker JT, Shoptaw S, Martin E, & Plankey MW (2016). Trajectories of Marijuana Use among HIV-seropositive and HIV-seronegative MSM in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), 1984–2013. AIDS and Behavior, 1–14. 10.1007/s10461-016-1445-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Pachankis JE (2014). Uncovering Clinical Principles and Techniques to Address Minority Stress, Mental Health, and Related Health Risks Among Gay and Bisexual Men. Clinical Psychology : A Publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 21(4), 313–330. 10.1111/cpsp.12078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Pines HA, Gorbach PM, Weiss RE, Shoptaw S, Landovitz RJ, Javanbakht M, Ostrow DG, Stall RD, & Plankey M. (2014). Sexual risk trajectories among MSM in the United States: Implications for pre-exposure prophylaxis delivery. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (1999), 65(5), 579–586. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Radloff LS (1977). The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. 10.1177/014662167700100306 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rhemtulla M, Brosseau-Liard PÉ, & Savalei V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. 10.1037/a0029315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rhodes E, & Giovannetti T. (2021). Grit and successful aging in older adults. Aging & Mental Health, 0(0), 1–8. 10.1080/13607863.2021.1919990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Roberts BW, Luo J, Briley DA, Chow PI, Su R, & Hill PL (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143(2), 117–141. 10.1037/bul0000088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Saunders-Scott D, Braley MB, & Stennes-Spidahl N. (2018). Traditional and psychological factors associated with academic success: Investigating best predictors of college retention. Motivation and Emotion, 42(4), 459–465. 10.1007/s11031-017-9660-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sharkey CM, Bakula DM, Baraldi AN, Perez MN, Suorsa KI, Chaney JM, & Mullins LL (2018). Grit, Illness-Related Distress, and Psychosocial Outcomes in College Students With a Chronic Medical Condition: A Path Analysis. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 43(5), 552–560. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Smit PJ, Brady M, Carter M, Fernandes R, Lamore L, Meulbroek M, Ohayon M, Platteau T, Rehberg P, Rockstroh JK, & Thompson M. (2012). HIV-related stigma within communities of gay men: A literature review. AIDS Care, 24(4), 405–412. 10.1080/09540121.2011.613910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Smith AB, & Cook PF (2019). Comorbid mental health disorders in persons living with HIV: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 33(4), 364–370. 10.1016/j.apnu.2019.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, & Löwe B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Stieger M, Flückiger C, Rüegger D, Kowatsch T, Roberts BW, & Allemand M. (2021). Changing personality traits with the help of a digital personality change intervention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8). 10.1073/pnas.2017548118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Toutenburg H. (1990). Rubin, D.B.: Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Statistical Papers, 31(1), 180–180. 10.1007/BF02924688 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Turiano NA, Pitzer L, Armour C, Karlamangla A, Ryff CD, & Mroczek DK (2012). Personality Trait Level and Change as Predictors of Health Outcomes: Findings From a National Study of Americans (MIDUS). The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 67B(1), 4–12. 10.1093/geronb/gbr072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Valdiserri RO, Holtgrave DR, Poteat TC, & Beyrer C. (2019). Unraveling Health Disparities Among Sexual and Gender Minorities: A Commentary on the Persistent Impact of Stigma. Journal of Homosexuality, 66(5), 571–589. 10.1080/00918369.2017.1422944 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. van Zyl LE, Olckers C, & Roll LC (2020). The Psychometric Properties of the Grit-O Scale Within the Twente Region in Netherlands: An ICM-CFA vs. ESEM Approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Von Culin KR, Tsukayama E, & Duckworth AL (2014). Unpacking grit: Motivational correlates of perseverance and passion for long-term goals. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(4), 306–312. 10.1080/17439760.2014.898320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. White IR, Royston P, & Wood AM (2011). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30(4), 377–399. 10.1002/sim.4067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wight RG, Harig F, Aneshensel CS, & Detels R. (2016). Depressive Symptom Trajectories, Aging-Related Stress, and Sexual Minority Stress Among Midlife and Older Gay Men: Linking Past and Present. Research on Aging, 38(4), 427–452. 10.1177/0164027515590423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wight RG, LeBlanc AJ, de Vries B, & Detels R. (2012). Stress and Mental Health Among Midlife and Older Gay-Identified Men. American Journal of Public Health, 102(3), 503–510. 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wight RG, LeBlanc AJ, Meyer IH, & Harig FA (2015). Internalized gay ageism, mattering, and depressive symptoms among midlife and older gay-identified men. Social Science & Medicine, 147, 200–208. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Winiker AK, Tobin KE, Davey-Rothwell M, & Latkin C. (2019). An Examination of Grit in Black Men Who Have Sex with Men (BMSM) and Associations with Health and Social Outcomes. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(5), 1095–1104. 10.1002/jcop.22176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhang MX, Mou NL, Tong KK, & Wu AMS (2018). Investigation of the Effects of Purpose in Life, Grit, Gratitude, and School Belonging on Mental Distress among Chinese Emerging Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2147. 10.3390/ijerph15102147 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp 1

RESOURCES