ABSTRACT
Phylogenetic distribution and extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) activity of Escherichia coli recovered from surface and reclaimed water in the mid-Atlantic U.S. were evaluated. Among 488 isolates, phylogroups B1 and A were the most and least prevalent, respectively. Water type, but not season, affected phylogroup distribution. The likelihood of detecting group A isolates was higher in reclaimed than pond (P < 0.01), freshwater river (P < 0.01) or brackish river (P < 0.05) water. Homogeneity in group distribution was lowest in pond water, where group B1 comprised 50% of isolates. Only 16 (3.3%) isolates exhibited phenotypic resistance to one or more cephalosporins tested and only four had ESBL activity, representing groups B1, B2 isolates, and D. Phylogroup was a factor in antimicrobial resistance (P < 0.05), with group A (8.7%) and D (1.6%) exhibiting the highest and lowest rates. Resistance to cefoxitin was the most prevalent. Multi- versus single drug resistance was affected by phylogroup (P < 0.05) and more likely in groups D and B1 than A which carried resistance to cefoxitin only. The most detected β-lactam resistance genes were blaCMY-2 and blaTEM. Water type was a factor for blaCTX-M gene detection (P < 0.05). Phenotypic resistance to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime and ceftazidime, and genetic determinants for ESBL-mediated resistance were found predominantly in B2 and D isolates from rivers and reclaimed water. Overall, ESBL activity and cephalosporin resistance in reclaimed and surface water isolates were low. Integrating data on ESBL activity and β-lactam resistance among E. coli populations can inform decisions on safety of irrigation water sources and One Health.
IMPORTANCE Extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria, that are resistant to a broad range of antimicrobial agents, are spreading in the environment but data remain scarce. ESBL-producing Escherichia coli infections in the community are on the rise. This work was conducted to assess presence of ESBL-producing E. coli in water that could be used for irrigation of fresh produce. The study provides the most extensive evaluation of ESBL-producing E. coli in surface and reclaimed water in the mid-Atlantic United States. The prevalence of ESBL producers was low and phenotypic resistance to cephalosporins (types of β-lactam antibiotics) was affected by season but not water type. Data on antimicrobial resistance among E. coli populations in water can inform decisions on safety of irrigation water sources and One Health.
KEYWORDS: irrigation water, ESBL-producing Escherichia coli, β-lactam resistance, cephalosporin resistance, antimicrobial resistance genes, reclaimed wastewater for irrigation
INTRODUCTION
Agricultural water is a major reservoir of known and non-reportable foodborne pathogens (1), driving raw vegetable associated foodborne illnesses that are increasingly traced back to irrigation water (2). Prospective and on-farm agricultural water sources in the mid-Atlantic United States, including river, pond and treated municipal wastewater (reclaimed water), harbor high concentrations of fecal coliforms and enteric pathogens (3–5). Assurance of microbiological quality of water for irrigation purposes is a critical step in minimizing crop contamination and support food safety efforts. These efforts should comprise in depth investigations through ecological studies that go beyond quantification of fecal bacteria. Assessment of other hazards, such as distribution of antimicrobial resistance gene carriage in pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacterial populations would further advance our comprehension of risk associated with specific water sources.
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommend Escherichia coli over other heterotrophic bacteria as a microbial water quality indicator for fecal contamination because of its natural residence in mammalian gastrointestinal tracts (6, 7). Current FDA standards for agricultural water in the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule (PSR; 21 CFR 112) use generic E. coli (8) when testing is needed. Although most strains of E. coli are commensal in the human gut, some are pathogenic and able to cause a variety of illnesses including gastrointestinal and extraintestinal diseases. Six well-characterized E. coli pathogenic groups known for causing gastroenteritis are enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) and diffusively adherent E. coli (DAEC) (9).
Due to the extensive diversity in genetic substructure, E. coli is classified into four different phylogroups, A, B1, B2 and D, based on the presence of three virulence genes, heme transport (chuA), stress related gene (yjaA) and lipase/esterase (tspE4C2) (10). Phylogroup members share distinct phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. Generic/commensal strains make up most of phylogroups A and B1, in addition to some Shiga-toxin producing and entero-pathogenic strains in these two groups, respectively. Groups B2 and D mostly comprise of infectious extra-intestinal strains with the latter group also including some entero-pathogenic strains (10–14).
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to several broad and extended spectrum antimicrobials in commensal and pathogenic E. coli is a major contributor of infection and enhanced morbidity and mortality (15). Every year, approximately 2.8 million people are sickened by AMR infections, with 197,400 estimated cases in hospitalized patients and 9,100 estimated deaths in 2017 attributed to extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae (16). Extended spectrum β-lactamases are enzymes produced by bacteria that degrade β-lactam antibiotics including penicillins and cephalosporins, and ESBL-producing bacteria can be resistant to multiple antimicrobials. About 17% of all ESBL-producing E. coli were predicted to be virulent based on the presence of genetic markers for virulence determinants in a study evaluating 170 ESBL-producing isolates from Dutch wastewater (17). It is estimated that more global deaths are associated with or attributable to antimicrobial-resistant E. coli than any other antimicrobial resistant pathogen (18). ESBL-producing E. coli in the environment can emanate from untreated municipal sewage effluent, untreated hospital effluent or treated effluent (19) and further spread to fresh produce via irrigation water (20). Therefore, regardless of the phylogenetic class of E. coli, AMR of agro-environmental strains is a public health concern. In view of the increased reports of ESBL-producing E. coli in vegetables (21–24), surveillance of extended spectrum AMR should be expanded to fresh crop production areas to better understand temporal and spatial dynamics of this public health concern.
In a previous study we conducted a longitudinal assessment of the microbial water quality of 11 irrigation water sources as possible alternatives to groundwater (5). The study sites were located within the Chesapeake Bay watershed in the mid-Atlantic United States, a region with a very dense urban population and highly mixed land use, including agricultural and conservation areas. The study sites comprised of surface (irrigation ponds and rivers) and reclaimed water which were sampled over 330 times during a 2-year period and from which 724 E. coli isolates were isolated and archived for further characterization. The risk of introducing pathogenic and ESBL-producing E. coli to fresh produce crops via agricultural water could be water type dependent as a function of the heterogenous distribution of E. coli phylogroups and ESBL-producing strains in water environments. We hence assessed E. coli phylogrouping among isolates and subsequently investigated ESBL activity and phenotypic and genotypic β-lactam mediated resistance, to extensively evaluate environmental E. coli in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States.
RESULTS
Phylogenetic classification of uidA± E. coli.
To avoid assessment of clonal isolates, isolates with a unique phylogroup and resistance profile per collection date and site were selected, yielding 488 isolates. A higher number of confirmed unique E. coli isolates were recovered in fall (n = 177) and summer (n = 163) than spring (n = 86) and winter (n = 62). Their distribution by water type was as follows: 273 from non-tidal freshwater rivers, 73 from tidal brackish rivers, 82 from pond and 60 from reclaimed water. Isolates were classified into 4 phylogroups: 193 isolates were classified as group B1 (39.6%), 122 isolates as group D (25.0%), 104 isolates as group B2 (21.3%) and 69 isolates as group A (14.1%). Site was a factor in phylogroup distribution (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 488, df = 30) = 53.82, P < 0.01). The freshwater river site MA04 had the highest percentage (17.4%) of group A isolates and the pond water site MA10 had the lowest (1.5%). MA09, also a freshwater river, harbored the highest shares (13%) of groups B1 and D (14%), while the lowest representation for both groups was from reclaimed water site MA06 (2%). Rivers MA05 and MA07 each contained about 14.4% of all group B2 isolates, while reclaimed water site MA01 had the lowest proportion (1.9%). The most uniform distribution of phylogroups within each site was observed at MA04, followed by MA08. Reclaimed water sites displayed substantial heterogeneity in phylogroup distribution compared to all other water types.
Water type was found to be a factor for phylogroup distribution (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 488, df = 9) = 17.15, P < 0.05; Fig. 1A). The likelihood of detecting group A isolates was higher in reclaimed water compared with pond water (P < 0.01), freshwater river (P < 0.01) or brackish river (P < 0.05) (Fig. 1A). The likelihood of detecting members of group B1 was slightly higher in reclaimed (P < 0.1) compared with freshwater river. In general, the most prevalent phylogroup retrieved from all water types was B1 and the least prevalent was A (Fig. 1). The equitability index was used as a measure of the evenness of distribution of the four phylogroups by water type. The index approached 1 for rivers and reclaimed water (~0.96), indicating homogenous distribution of phylogroups, but was lower for pond water (0.86). In pond water, group B1 made up 50% of the assemblage, compared to <40% for all the other water types. Seasonal variation exerted no effect on the distribution of phylogroups (Pearson's Chi-squared test: χ2 (n = 488, df = 9) = 6.21, P > 0.1; Fig. 1B).
FIG 1.
Distribution of different phylogenetic groups of E. coli by (A) surface and reclaimed water sources and (B) season. The mosaic plots display the % frequency in four water types: five non-tidal freshwater rivers (NF), one tidal brackish river water (TB), two on-farm ponds (PW), and three reclaimed water (RW) sites.
Phenotypic resistance against cephalosporins.
We selected five 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins for susceptibility testing. Most E. coli isolates exhibited susceptibility to all cephalosporins tested (Table 1). Only 16/488 (3.3%) isolates exhibited resistance to single or multiple antibiotics. Only 4 isolates exhibited ESBL activity. Assigned phylogroup was a factor in whether resistance to any antibiotic was observed (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 488, df = 3) = 8.41, P < 0.05). Six of the 16 isolates were group A (6/69, 8.7% of group A), four each were in groups B1 (4/193, 2.1% of group B1) and B2 (4/104, 3.8% of group B2), and two were in group D (2/122, 1.6% of group D) (Table 2). Among the resistant isolates, phylogroup was a factor in MDR versus SDR (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 10.0, P < 0.05) with MDR associated with groups D, B1 and B2 and SDR with group A. Resistance patterns are listed in Table 2. Of note, one B1, one B2 and both D isolates exhibited resistance to all five cephalosporins tested (Fig. 2, Table 2). The six resistant isolates from group A exhibited resistance only to cefoxitin, the antibiotic for which resistance was most prevalent. Phylogroup was a factor for resistance to cefuroxime (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 15.29, P < 0.05), ceftriaxone (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 8.89, P < 0.05), cefotaxime (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 8.89, P < 0.05) and ceftazidime (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 7.86, P < 0.05). For all these antibiotics, resistance was more related to groups D and B2 than A.
TABLE 1.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of 488 E. coli isolates recovered from surface and reclaimed water to select cephalosporin antibioticsa
| Antibiotic | % Resistant | % Intermediate | % Sensitive |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ceftazidime (CAZ) | 1.0 (5) | 0 (0) | 99.0 (483) |
| Ceftriaxone (CRO) | 1.4 (7) | 0 (0) | 98.6 (481) |
| Cefotaxime (CTX) | 1.4 (7) | 0 (0) | 98.6 (481) |
| Cefuroxime (CXM) | 1.6 (8) | 0.2 (1) | 98.2 (479) |
| Cefoxitin (FOX) | 2.9 (14) | 0 (0) | 97.1 (474) |
The number of isolates (n) is given in parentheses.
TABLE 2.
Phenotypes and genotypes of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates recovered from four different water types, non-tidal fresh river/creek water (NF), tidal brackish river water (TB), pond water (PW) and reclaimed water (RW)a
| Resistant phenotype | Phylogroup | Water type | Season of collection | Genotype |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAZ/CTX/CRO/CXM/FOX | B1 | NF | Spring | bla TEM , bla CMY-1 , bla CMY-2 |
| B2 | NF | Winter | bla CMY-2 | |
| D | NF | Winter | bla TEM , bla CMY-2 | |
| D* | TB | Winter | bla CTX-M , bla OXA-2 | |
| CTX/CRO/CXM/FOX | B1* | NF | Fall | bla CMY-2 |
| CAZ/CTX/CRO/CXM | B2* | RW | Fall | bla CTX-M |
| CTX/CRO/CXM | B2* | RW | Fall | blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCMY-1, blaOXA-1 |
| CTX/FOX | B1 | NF | Summer | None |
| FOX | A | NF | Fall | bla CMY-2 |
| A | NF | Fall | bla TEM , bla CMY-2 | |
| A | RW | Fall | bla CMY-2 | |
| A | RW | Summer | bla TEM , bla CMY-2 | |
| A | NF | Summer | bla TEM , bla CMY-2 | |
| A | NF | Summer | bla CMY-2 | |
| B1 | PW | Fall | bla CMY-1 | |
| B2 | NF | Summer | bla TEM , bla CMY-2 |
Antibiotics tested were ceftazidime (CAZ), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), cefuroxime (CXM) and cefoxitin (FOX). *, denotes confirmed ESBL activity.
FIG 2.
Cephalosporin resistance (% frequency) among 16 E. coli isolates by phylogroup. For each antibiotic, n denotes number of isolates resistant to that antibiotic.
Out of the 16 resistant isolates, 10 (62.5%) were retrieved from non-tidal freshwater river, 1 (6.3%) from tidal brackish river water, 1 (6.3%) from on-farm ponds and 4 (25.0%) from reclaimed water (Table 2). Of these, 1 of the freshwater river isolates, the tidal river water isolate and 2 of the reclaimed water isolates were ESBL-producing (Table 2). Although no significant effect of water type was detected on AMR among the 488 isolates, for individual antibiotics, ceftazidime resistance was somewhat more likely to be detected in isolates recovered from sites MA02 (reclaimed), MA08 (tidal river) and MA09 (freshwater river) (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 488, df = 10) = 16.45, P < 0.1). Resistant isolates were collected mostly in fall (43.8%, n = 7/16) and summer (31.3%, n = 5/16) but these differences were not statistically supported. Resistance to individual antibiotics appeared to be significantly impacted by season. Ceftazidime χ2 (n = 488, df = 3) = 10.97, P < 0.05, cefotaxime χ2 (n = 488, df = 3) = 7.58, P = 0.05 and ceftriaxone (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 488, df = 3) = 7.58, P = 0.05) resistance was more likely to be detected in winter. Seasonal distribution of resistance is given in Table 2.
β-lactam resistance genotypes.
All 16 phenotypically resistant isolates were screened for seven β-lactam resistance genes: blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaCMY-1, blaCMY-2, blaOXA-1 and blaOXA-2. A total of nine isolates (56.3%), representing all phylogroups, harbored two or more AMR genes and one group B1 isolate from freshwater river had none of the seven resistance genes (Table 2). Five resistance genes were accumulated in one B2 isolate collected from reclaimed water in fall. The most prevalent gene detected was blaCMY-2 (11/16, 68.8%) followed by blaTEM (7/16, 43.8%), with both genes detected in E. coli isolates from all phylogroups.
Among the resistant isolates, water type was found to be a significant factor for detection of blaCTX-M (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 9.44, P < 0.05) and a weak association was seen for blaCMY-2 (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 7.16, P < 0.1). Season was not determined to be an important factor except for a weak association with blaCMY-1 (Pearson’s χ2 (n = 16, df = 3) = 6.62, P < 0.1).
Association among phylogroups, their phenotypic and genotypic traits, and environmental variables.
MCA was conducted on the 16 resistant isolates to assess the association between different variables: cephalosporin susceptibility pattern and AMR gene pattern in relation to phylogroup, season of isolate collection and water type (Fig. 3). The two-dimensional MCA plot explained 75.7% of the variability. Water type and phylogroup contributed the most to the variability. Phylogroup A contributed 26% to inertia of dimension 1 while B2 contributed 22% to dimension 2. Brackish river water contributed 15% to inertia of dimension 1 and reclaimed water 26% to dimension 2 inertia. Winter and summer both contributed ~15% to dimension 1. In the MCA plot, objects plotting away from the origin of the plot are the most distinct, compared to objects plotting around the center. Cefotaxime, ceftriaxone and cefuroxime resistance plotted away from the center with MDR and were not related to summer collection when irrigation is at its peak use. Group A and summer were associated with SDR. Winter was related to isolates in group D and resistance to ceftazidime. Spring, summer and fall, pond and river water, and groups A and B1 were related to susceptibility to several antibiotics (except for cefoxitin) and absence of genes tested. The variables falling farthest from the center of the plot, representing traits of a minority of isolates, comprised the rarely detected genes blaSHV, blaOXA-1 and blaOXA-2 and infrequently observed susceptibility to cefoxitin (Fig. 3).
FIG 3.
Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) plot showing the relationships between phylogenetic groups of E. coli (number of isolates = 16), their phenotypic resistance traits and carriage of β-lactam antibiotic resistance genes, and season of collection and water source. Presence or absence (+/−) of each gene, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaCMY-1, blaCMY-2, blaOXA-1, blaOXA-2 were denoted as tem, shv, ctxM, cmy1, cmy2, oxa1 and oxa2, respectively.
Hierarchical cluster analysis of resistant E. coli isolates based on phenotypic resistance and resistance gene presence revealed two main branches, with isolates from groups A predominantly populating one cluster and groups B1, B2 and D comprising the other cluster (Fig. 4). The former cluster comprised only summer and fall isolates mostly from non-tidal freshwater river and reclaimed water sites. Isolates from group A showed the highest similarity among each other, independent of site or season of collection. The second cluster of B1, B2 and D groups was populated by isolates exhibiting MDR (Table 2). A pair of MDR ESBL-producers from reclaimed water and a tidal river that also carried the blaCTX-M gene formed their own cluster (Table 2). ANOSIM supported differences by phylogroup (global R = 0.48, P ≤ 0.001); specifically, between group A and B1 (R = 0.71; P < 0.01), A and B2 (R = 0.49; P < 0.05), and A and D (R = 0.98; P < 0.05). Water type was a determinant for β-lactam resistance (global R = 0.30, P < 0.05) but pairwise differences could not be determined due to small sample sizes for some water types. The seasonal effect was not significant (R = 0.2, P = 0.07). Resistant isolates mostly derived from non-tidal freshwater river water and represented the most diversity, year round.
FIG 4.
Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA; group average method using simple matching coefficient) of resistant E. coli isolates based on profiles of phenotypic resistance to ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cefoxitin, and genotypic resistance based on detection of genes blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaCMY-1, blaCMY-2, blaOXA-1 and blaOXA-2, by phylogenetic group (A, B1, B2 and D), water type (non-tidal freshwater rivers [NF], tidal brackish river [TB]; on-farm ponds [PW] and reclaimed water [RW]), and season of collection.
DISCUSSION
Demands for alternative and sustainable irrigation water for fresh fruit and vegetable production in the United States are redirecting attention from groundwater to reclaimed (recycled) and rechargeable surface water sources such as ponds and rivers. With the implementation of revised agricultural water standards to improve food safety, prioritizing irrigation water quality can minimize the risk of transfer of pathogenic and antimicrobial resistant E. coli to humans via fresh produce crops. Previous research by our group determined the adequacy of irrigation water sources in the mid-Atlantic based on E. coli concentrations and proposed microbial standards for agricultural water (5, 29). Research presented in this study was conducted to more specifically investigate the incidence of extended spectrum β-lactamase production and gene carriage, and cephalosporin resistance among E. coli in these irrigation water sources. Our study detected a year-round diversity of E. coli phylogroups in surface and reclaimed water sources, with phylogroup distribution exhibiting some dependency on water source. Despite this ubiquity and diversity, resistance to cephalosporins was low and only four isolates were confirmed ESBL-producers. While phylogrouping and season were factors affecting phenotypic resistance, the drivers influencing presence of β-lactamase genes were less clear. Conversely, an association between water type and phenotypic antimicrobial resistance was not detected but water type was a factor in blaCTX-M gene detection. Integrating all the data revealed relationships among water type, season of collection, phylogroup, phenotypic resistance and β-lactamase gene carriage. Two main clusters of resistant E. coli isolates were identified, one comprised mainly of group A isolates with single drug resistance to cefoxitin and another cluster composed of several group B2 and D isolates carrying resistance to multiple cephalosporins.
E. coli isolates from irrigation water and farms in Mexico and Portugal mostly belonged to groups A and B1 (30, 31). Irrigation water, animals and humans in the mid-Atlantic United States previously yielded a higher proportion of group B1 compared to other genotypes of E. coli (32). Moreover, the lotic systems investigated in this study were previously reported to carry higher microbial loads and higher levels of the foodborne pathogens Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes compared to pond and reclaimed water (5). Hence, in this study, we anticipated group A and B1 dominance in farm ponds and some evidence for a differential food safety risk for rivers. However, E. coli phylogrouping revealed a homogenous distribution of groups in all water types, regardless of season. This study revealed that group B1 was the predominant group in all water types, but groups A and B1 were more likely to be detected in reclaimed and pond water, respectively. The lower equitability index in ponds was attributed to the predominance of group B1 in pond water, with a concomitant lower proportion of group A. Group D comprised a little over a quarter of all E. coli isolates in rivers and ponds, but only 15% of reclaimed water samples. Finally, rivers had a higher proportion of B2 isolates compared to pond and reclaimed water. In a pediatric study, phylogroup assignment of E. coli strains isolated from children found that group A isolates associated with asymptomatic cases, while group D associated with diarrhea (33). Isolates from groups B2 and D tended to cause persistent symptoms compared to milder diarrhea caused by groups A and B1 (33). Our findings, therefore, may signal a slightly higher likelihood of exposure to more severe intestinal pathogens (in groups B2 and D) from river water (average 50%), relative to ponds (44%) and reclaimed water (34%). Coupled with lower reported S. enterica and L. monocytogenes prevalence (5), the lower proportions of group B2 E. coli isolates in ponds, and B2 and D isolates in reclaimed water, support the preferential use of these water sources over rivers for irrigation of fresh crops.
The relatively low level of antimicrobial resistance to cephalosporins in E. coli detected in our various surface water sources and reclaimed water sites is encouraging for mid-Atlantic agriculture. The possibility of introducing antimicrobial resistant E. coli into the food chain via irrigated fresh produce crops is increasingly regarded as a plausible public health threat (34). Several studies have reported the occurrence of ESBL producers among the Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli, isolated from vegetables (21, 23, 35–37). The presence of ESBL-producing bacteria in vegetables is especially worrying considering the occurrence of these bacteria in healthy humans, which appears to be spreading worldwide (38), and the potential for long-term persistence of these AMR bacteria in the agro-environment, once introduced (39). In addition to the low occurrence of ESBL-producing E. coli reported here, the phylogroup most likely to exhibit phenotypic resistance in our study was group A. This group was associated with reduced susceptibility to only a single antibiotic, cefoxitin, a 2nd generation cephalosporin. Only two E. coli group D isolates were found to exhibit phenotypic resistance in our study, but both were resistant to all cephalosporins tested. The eight resistant isolates in groups B1 and B2 were more heterogenous, exhibiting both single and multidrug resistance. These findings suggest a low chance of exposure to resistant pathogens via irrigation water and irrigated crops. Similar findings were recorded in two studies in Portugal with 3.6% β-lactam drug resistant E. coli retrieval from irrigation water, 5.3% retrieval from fresh vegetables in household farms (30) and a very low level of ESBL genes detected in E. coli from irrigation waters from urban farms in Manila, Philippines (40). A higher AMR occurrence was reported from irrigation water at a Swiss fresh produce farm where 22% of recovered E. coli were ESBL-producers (41) and on Ecuador farms where 58% of E. coli isolated from irrigation water had the phenotype (37). There is a report that β-lactam resistance is disseminating with colonization of wildlife populations (42), and this factor could explain geographical differences in ESBL-producing capacity among environmental E. coli in certain regions.
No overall influence of water type was revealed on AMR to cephalosporins. In a study conducted in the Netherlands, MDR E. coli from wastewater treatment plant effluents were disseminating to surface waters (43). In our study, we did not find a greater association with ESBL-producing E. coli and reclaimed wastewater sites compared to all other sites, perhaps because penicillin concentration did not differ drastically among water types tested in concurrent pharmaceutical level testing (44). Other investigators have postulated that antibiotic concentrations in treated municipal effluents (reclaimed water) are not high enough to induce AMR in bacteria, and that other point sources of pollution (industrially polluted surface water, untreated hospital effluent and untreated municipal sewage) may be more likely to have sufficiently high concentrations to exert selective pressure for AMR development (19). Of note, however, is that the ESBL-producing isolate with the most genetic determinants (but not the most phenotypic resistance) was a B2 isolate from reclaimed water (Table 2).
β-lactam resistance is predominantly conferred by SHV, TEM and CTX-M β-lactamases. The former, encoded by blaCTX-M genes that preferentially confer resistance to cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, have become predominant. The blaCTX-M-15 genotype was associated with presumptively pathogenic group B2 E. coli isolated from surface and reclaimed water in the Netherlands (17). Others have reported detection of the blaCTX-M determinants in E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae from irrigation water (41, 45). In our study blaCTX-M was found in only 2 group B2 isolates from reclaimed water and one group D isolate from a tidal river, all three confirmed ESBL-producers, suggesting a low prevalence for this determinant in mid-Atlantic water available for irrigation of crops. Instead, blaCMY-2, encoding AmpC β-lactamase, was the most predominant gene detected, found in all group A and one-half of groups B1, B2 and D isolates that exhibited a resistant phenotype. The only other gene detected in all phylogroups was blaTEM. However, the blaSHV a combination that also more rarely confers ESBL activity, depending on the gene variants present, was only detected in one B2 isolate that also carried blaCTX-M. The blaTEM gene was also commonly detected in E. coli from both irrigation water and vegetables on household farms in Portugal (30). Group A and B1 isolates, noted above as groups less likely to associate with severe intestinal illness, carried fewer resistance determinants with a genotype characterized by blaCMY-2, blaCMY-1 and blaTEM. Group A isolates clustered together in hierarchical cluster analysis, reflecting the low phenotypic and gene carriage detected in these isolates, By contrast, group B2 and D isolates, noted above as more likely to associate with symptomatic and persistent diarrhea, were characterized by a heterogenous β-lactamase genotype. Isolates in groups B2 and D clustered together with B1 isolates. The latter isolates were mixed in gene carriage status, ranging from no genes detected, to being positive to all genes tested. The dichotomy is interesting and should be explored further, especially in relation to crop growing season and times of highest irrigation frequency. The findings concurred with other reports that blaCMY and/or blaTEM, were the most widespread genes in phylogroup A and B1, while blaCTX-M more commonly associated with phylogroups B2 and D (20, 46).
Conclusion.
Our study provides an integrated assessment of the phylogenetic analysis, and phenotypic and genotypic β-lactamase-producing traits of E. coli recovered from irrigation water sources in the mid-Atlantic United States. Phenotypic resistance to cephalosporins in E. coli was observed at a low prevalence (3.3%). Most phenotypic resistance and genetic determinants were identified in group B2 and D isolates from reclaimed water and rivers. Resistant isolates could be grouped into two main clusters. One group was composed primarily of phylogroup A isolates collected in summer and fall, exhibiting resistance to cefoxitin but susceptibility to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime and cefuroxime. Another group comprised of phylogroup B1, B2 and D isolates with a tendency for MDR, retrieved in fall and winter samplings when vegetable crop production is low. These isolates were more likely to exhibit phenotypic resistance to cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime and ceftazidime. Overall, ESBL-producing E. coli were recovered at low prevalence in pond, rivers and reclaimed water examined. Small sample sizes for some water types and the restriction on reclaimed water sample collection in the winter were limitations of our study that should be considered in data interpretation. Nevertheless, resistance to β-lactams in reclaimed water warrants further investigation, as those isolates differed in their resistance traits. Findings from this study support the preferential use of pond water for irrigation of fresh produce crops over river water to minimize the dissemination of ESBL-producing E. coli via food. Understanding factors that favor ESBL producers in surface and reclaimed waters can inform decisions that support One Health.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection, processing, and E. coli isolation.
Water samples (n = 333) were collected from nine potential irrigation water sites and two on-farm irrigation ponds in the mid-Atlantic region between September 2016 and October 2018. The research was reviewed by the University of Maryland College Park Institutional Review Board (IRB, project number 964795-1) and was deemed exempt due to minimal risk to farm owners. Four different water types were included, non-tidal freshwater river/creek (site codes: MA03, MA04, MA05, MA07, MA09), tidal brackish river water (site code: MA08), pond water (site codes: MA10, MA11) and tertiary treated reclaimed wastewater (site codes: MA01, MA02, MA06). Water was collected according to the method described in Solaiman et al. (5). Within 12 h of sampling, standard membrane filtration was carried out according to U.S. EPA method 1604 (25). Briefly, water was filtered through 0.45 μm, 0.47 mm nitrate ester membranes (Pall Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) and the filters incubated at 37°C for 24 h on MI agar (Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD), Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). A total of 724 single presumptive E. coli colonies (maximum 3 colonies per sample) were isolated from the membranes and re-streaked onto MacConkey agar (BD) for further identification confirmation.
Since the sites included farms, the study was reviewed by the University of Maryland College Park Institutional Review Board (IRB) (project number 964795-1) and was approved as exempt due to minimal risk to farm owners.
DNA extraction and identification of E. coli by PCR.
For PCR confirmation of presumptive E. coli (n = 724), colonies from MacConkey agar were resuspended in 7.5% sterile Chelex100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution for DNA extraction using a rapid heat lysis method (26). A species-specific PCR (PCR) was employed by amplifying the β-glucuronidase gene, uidA, to confirm identification of E. coli isolates (27). Amplification was performed in 1X PCR buffer (New England Biolabs [NEB], Ipswich, MA, USA), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (NEB), 0.2 mM dNTPs (NEB), 0.4 μM 16S rRNA gene primers (internal control) and uidA primers (Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT), Coralville, IA, USA) (Table 3), 5 Units Taq DNA polymerase (NEB) and ~20 ng of template DNA. The standard cycling conditions consisted of an initial single cycle at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, elongation at 72°C for 30 s and a final single cycle at 72°C for 5 min. E. coli CFT073-UPEC was used as a positive control.
TABLE 3.
List of primers used for identification confirmation, classification and resistance gene detection in E. coli isolates
| Gene | Size (bp) | Primer | Sequences (5′–3′) | References/notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| uidA | 192 | Forward | CAGTCTGGATCGCGAAAA | 27 |
| Reverse | ACCAGACGTTGCCCACATA | |||
| 16S rRNA | 357 | Forward | AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG |
47
48 |
| Reverse | TGACGGGCGGTGTGTACAAG | |||
| chuA | 279 | Forward | GACGAACCAACGGTCAGGAT | 10 |
| Reverse | TGCCGCCAGTACCAAAGACA | |||
| yjaA | 211 | Forward | TGAAGTGTCAGGAGACGCTG | |
| Reverse | ATGGAGAATGCGTTCCTCAAC | |||
| TspE4.C2 | 152 | Forward | GAGTAATGTCGGGGCATTCA | |
| Reverse | CGCGCCAACAAAGTATTACG | |||
| bla CTX-M | 593 | Forward | ATGTGCAGYACCAGTAARGT | 49; designed from conserved regions of blaCTX-M genes, including blaCTX-M-1 to blaCTX-M-30 |
| Reverse | TGGGTRAARTARGTSACCAGA | |||
| bla TEM | 964 | Forward | GCGGAACCCCTATTTG | 50 |
| Reverse | ACCAATGCTTAATCAGTGAG | |||
| bla SHV | 854 | Forward | TTCGCCTGTGTATTATCTCCCTG | 51 |
| Reverse | TTAGCGTTGCCAGTGYTCG | |||
| bla CMY-1 | 915 | Forward | GTGGTGGATGCCAGCATCC | |
| Reverse | GGTCGAGCCGGTCTTGTTGAA | |||
| bla CMY-2 | 758 | Forward | GCACTTAGCCACCTATACGGCAG | |
| Reverse | GCTTTTCAAGAATGCGCCAGG | |||
| bla OXA-1 | 820 | Forward | ATGAAAAACACAATACATATCAACTTCGC | 50 |
| Reverse | GTGTGTTTAGAATGGTGATCGCAT | |||
| bla OXA-2 | 602 | Forward | ACGATAGTTGTGGCAGACGAAC | 51 |
| Reverse | ATYCTGTTTGGCGTATCRATATTC |
E. coli phylogrouping.
Phylogrouping of E. coli isolates (n = 724) was performed using a triplex PCR by amplification of the three virulence genes: heme transport gene (chuA), stress related gene (yjaA) and lipase/esterase gene fragment (TspE4C2), adapted from Clermont et al. (10). The multiplex amplification was performed in 1X PCR buffer (NEB), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (NEB), 0.2 mM dNTPs (NEB), 0.4 μM chuA, yjaA and TspE4C2 primer pairs (IDT) (Table 3) and 5 units Taq DNA polymerase (NEB). Approximately 20 ng of template DNA was used for the reaction. The standard cycling conditions consisted of an initial step at 95°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, annealing at 55°C for 15 s, elongation at 72°C for 30 s, followed by a final elongation at 72°C for 5 min. Amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel (Lonza, Rockland, ME, USA). E. coli CFT073-UPEC was used as a positive control.
Phenotypic determination of cephalosporin resistance in E. coli.
Each E. coli isolate (n = 724) was inoculated on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA; BD), subcultured in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) (BD) and incubated at 37°C with shaking for 3 h. Cultures were spread plated onto pre-prepared Mueller-Hinton agar plates (MHA) (BD). Five cephalosporin disks including 2nd generation cefoxitin (30 μg; FOX30) and cefuroxime (30 μg; CXM30), and 3rd generation ceftriaxone (30 μg; CRO30), cefotaxime (30 μg; CTX30) and ceftazidime (30 μg; CAZ30) were placed on MHA plates. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 18–20 h according to standard recommendations (28). Data were interpreted from the diameter of the inhibition zone according to CLSI (28).
Determination of ESBL activity.
Sixteen isolates that were positive for either ceftazidime or cefotaxime resistance were further tested for ESBL activity by disk diffusion according to CLSI recommendations (28). Suspensions at 0.5 MacFarland were made in sterile water from fresh 20-h MH agar cultures and spread on fresh MH agar. Antibiotic disks (ceftazidime 30 μg, ceftazidime- clavulanic acid 30/10 μg [BD]), cefotaxime 30 μg (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA, USA) and cefotaxime-clavulanic acid 30/10 μg (BD) were ascetically placed onto plates and incubated at 35°C for 17 h. The difference in the zone of inhibition between disks supplemented with clavulanic acid and disks with antibiotic alone was recorded and isolates with a difference of ≥5 mm were considered ESBL-producing.
Genotypic evaluation of β-lactam resistance in E. coli.
This analysis was performed on isolates that exhibited phenotypic AMR to at least one antibiotic. Three sets of multiplex PCR amplifications were employed for detection of the β-lactam antimicrobial resistance genes blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M, blaCMY-1, blaCMY-2, blaOXA-1 and blaOXA-2. Primer pairs used for detection of these genes are listed in Table 3. DNA was extracted from resistant isolates identified through phenotypic testing using the Qiagen DNeasy Ultraclean Microbial DNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Multiplex PCR was done with 1X PCR buffer (NEB), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (NEB), 0.2 mM dNTPs (NEB) and 0.3 μM each primer (IDT). Standard cycling condition for amplification were performed using 3 protocols. Protocol I included an initial step (95°C for 15 min) followed by 30 cycles of amplification, 95°C for 60 s, 55°C for 40 s, and 72°C for 60 s, followed by a final elongation at 72°C for 3 min for blaTEM-blaSHV-16S rRNA genes. For protocol II, standard cycling conditions started with an initial step at 95°C for 15 s, followed by 30 cycles of amplification comprised of 95°C for 60 s, 60°C for 40 s, 72°C for 60 s, with a final elongation step at 72°C for 3 min for blaCMY-1-blaCMY-2-blaOXA-1-blaOXA-2-16S rRNA genes. For protocol III, standard cycling conditions started with an initial step at 95°C for 1 min followed by 30 cycles of amplification comprised of 95°C for 15 s, 52°C for 15 s, 72°C for 10 s for blaCTX-M-16S rRNA genes. PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose (Lonza) gels to determine presence or absence of target genes.
Data management and statistical analysis.
To avoid clonality, 488 out of 724 E. coli isolates were selected for data analysis based on unique combinations of water source, collection date, phylogroup assignment, phenotypic AMR profile and resistance gene carriage. Data were pooled by water type (five freshwater river, one tidal river, two ponds, and three reclaimed water sites) and season (from 1 March to 30 May as spring, from 1 June to 31 August as summer, from 1 September to 30 November as fall, from 1 December to 28 February as winter) as in Solaiman et al. (5). No reclaimed water samples were collected in the winter. Results for analysis were verified by rerunning analysis excluding reclaimed water or winter data. Phylogroup evenness was calculated for each water type using Shannon’s Equitability Index (EH):
where n is the number of isolates per phylogroup, i is the number of phylogroups, N is the total number of isolates. Isolates were grouped according to resistance to a single cephalosporin drug (SDR) or two or more cephalosporins (MDR). Effect of variables was assessed using the χ-squared test with α = 0.05. Multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the effect of season or water type on E. coli phylogroup distribution. Nominal regression was used to assess group distribution by site. Hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) using the group average method was conducted to construct a dendrogram from a similarity matrix using the simple matching coefficient based on phenotypic resistance and the presence/absence of β-lactam resistance genes among the four E. coli phylogroups. The simple matching coefficient was selected as it resembles the Jaccard index but also counts both mutual presence and mutual absence of attributes between samples. ANOSIM was used to evaluate the similarity between groups, phylogroup, water type and season. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) was conducted using group classification, presence/absence of resistance genes, season and water type to assess the associations among these categorical variables. Statistical analysis and graphical representation were performed in R ver. 3.6.3. HCA and ANOSIM were conducted in Primer 6 ver. 6.1.15 and logistic regression and MCA analysis were performed in JMP Pro ver. 15.2.0.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Angela Ferelli and Xingchen Liu for lab assistance. This work was supported by CONSERVE, funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture-National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Grant number 2016-68007-25064. S.S. was also in part supported by a UMD Global STEWARDS Fellowship through a National Science Foundation Research Traineeship (NRT) – Innovations at the Nexus of Food, Energy and Water Systems (INFEWS) award number 1828910. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Contributor Information
Shirley A. Micallef, Email: smicall@umd.edu.
Laura Villanueva, Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research.
REFERENCES
- 1.Uyttendaele M, Jaykus L-A, Amoah P, Chiodini A, Cunliffe D, Jacxsens L, Holvoet K, Korsten L, Lau M, McClure P, Medema G, Sampers I, Rao Jasti P. 2015. Microbial hazards in irrigation water: standards, norms, and testing to manage use of water in fresh produce primary production. Comprehensive Rev in Food Science and Food Safety 14:336–356. 10.1111/1541-4337.12133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.CDC. 2018. National Outbreak Reporting Systems (NORS) Dashboard. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/norsdashboard/.
- 3.Haymaker J, Sharma M, Parveen S, Hashem F, May EB, Handy ET, White C, East C, Bradshaw R, Micallef SA, Callahan MT, Allard S, Anderson B, Craighead S, Gartley S, Vanore A, Kniel KE, Solaiman S, Bui A, Murray R, Craddock HA, Kulkarni P, Foust D, Duncan R, Taabodi M, Sapkota AR. 2019. Prevalence of Shiga-toxigenic and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in untreated surface water and reclaimed water in the Mid-Atlantic U.S. Environ Res 172:630–636. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sharma M, Handy ET, East CL, Kim S, Jiang C, Callahan MT, Allard SM, Micallef S, Craighead S, Anderson-Coughlin B, Gartley S, Vanore A, Kniel KE, Haymaker J, Duncan R, Foust D, White C, Taabodi M, Hashem F, Parveen S, May E, Bui A, Craddock H, Kulkarni P, Murray RT, Sapkota AR. 2020. Prevalence of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes in non-traditional irrigation waters in the mid-Atlantic United States is affected by water type, season, and recovery method. PLoS One 15:e0229365. 10.1371/journal.pone.0229365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Solaiman S, Allard SM, Callahan MT, Jiang C, Handy E, East C, Haymaker J, Bui A, Craddock H, Murray R, Kulkarni P, Anderson-Coughlin B, Craighead S, Gartley S, Vanore A, Duncan R, Foust D, Taabodi M, Sapkota A, May E, Hashem F, Parveen S, Kniel K, Sharma M, Sapkota AR, Micallef SA. 2020. Longitudinal assessment of the dynamics of Escherichia coli, total coliforms, Enterococcus spp., and Aeromonas spp. in alternative irrigation water sources: a CONSERVE Study. Appl Environ Microbiol 86:e00342-20. 10.1128/AEM.00342-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ashbolt NJ, Grabow WOK, Snozzi M. 2001. Indicators of microbial water quality. In Fewtrell L, Bartram J (Eds.). Water quality – guidelines, standards and health. Assessment of risk and risk management for water-related infectious disease. p 289–316. https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/eawag/islandora/object/eawag%3A11261. [Google Scholar]
- 7.FDA. 2011. Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). Public Law 2011, 111–353. U.S. Government Publishing Office, 124 Stat. 3885, p 3885–3973. [Google Scholar]
- 8.FDA. 2015. Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Produce Safety Rule. Standards for the growing, harvesting, packing, and holding of produce for human consumption. 80 FR 74353. 21 CFR Parts 11, 16, and 112. Department of Health and Human Services, FDA, Document Number: 2015–28159, p 74353–74672. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HLT. 2004. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:123–140. 10.1038/nrmicro818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. 2000. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4555–4558. 10.1128/AEM.66.10.4555-4558.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bingen E, Picard B, Brahimi N, Mathy S, Desjardins P, Elion J, Denamur E. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli strains causing neonatal meningitis suggests horizontal gene transfer from a predominant pool of highly virulent B2 group strains. J Infect Dis 177:642–650. 10.1086/514217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Boyd EF, Hartl DL. 1998. Chromosomal regions specific to pathogenic isolates of Escherichia coli have a phylogenetically clustered distribution. J Bacteriol 180:1159–1165. 10.1128/JB.180.5.1159-1165.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Picard B, Garcia JS, Gouriou S, Duriez P, Brahimi N, Bingen E, Elion J, Denamur E. 1999. The link between phylogeny and virulence in Escherichia coli extraintestinal infection. Infect Immun 67:546–553. 10.1128/IAI.67.2.546-553.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Johnson JR, Stell AL. 2000. Extended virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli strains from patients with urosepsis in relation to phylogeny and host compromise. J Infect Dis 181:261–272. 10.1086/315217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Llor C, Bjerrum L. 2014. Antimicrobial resistance: risk associated with antibiotic overuse and initiatives to reduce the problem. Ther Adv Drug Saf 5:229–241. 10.1177/2042098614554919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). 2019. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Franz E, Veenman C, van Hoek AHAM, Husman A de R, Blaak H. 2015. Pathogenic Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases isolated from surface water and wastewater. Sci Rep 5:14372. 10.1038/srep14372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, Han C, Bisignano C, Rao P, Wool E, Johnson SC, Browne AJ, Chipeta MG, Fell F, Hackett S, Haines-Woodhouse G, Kashef Hamadani BH, Kumaran EAP, McManigal B, Agarwal R, Akech S, Albertson S, Amuasi J, Andrews J, Aravkin A, Ashley E, Bailey F, Baker S, Basnyat B, Bekker A, Bender R, Bethou A, Bielicki J, Boonkasidecha S, Bukosia J, Carvalheiro C, Castañeda-Orjuela C, Chansamouth V, Chaurasia S, Chiurchiù S, Chowdhury F, Cook AJ, Cooper B, Cressey TR, Criollo-Mora E, Cunningham M, Darboe S, Day NPJ, De Luca M, Dokova K, et al. 2022. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399:629–655. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Larsson DGJ, Flach C-F. 2022. Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat Rev Microbiol 20:257–269. 10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.van Hoek AHAM, Veenman C, van Overbeek WM, Lynch G, de Roda Husman AM, Blaak H. 2015. Prevalence and characterization of ESBL- and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae on retail vegetables. Int J Food Microbiol 204:1–8. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Reuland EA, Al Naiemi N, Raadsen SA, Savelkoul PHM, Kluytmans JAJW, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CMJE. 2014. Prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in raw vegetables. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33:1843–1846. 10.1007/s10096-014-2142-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zurfluh K, Nüesch-Inderbinen M, Morach M, Zihler Berner A, Hächler H, Stephan R. 2015. Extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae isolated from vegetables imported from the Dominican Republic, India, Thailand, and Vietnam. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:3115–3120. 10.1128/AEM.00258-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Richter L, Du Plessis EM, Duvenage S, Korsten L. 2019. occurrence, identification, and antimicrobial resistance profiles of extended-spectrum and AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from fresh vegetables retailed in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Foodborne Pathog Dis 16:421–427. 10.1089/fpd.2018.2558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Richter L, Du Plessis EM, Duvenage S, Korsten L. 2020. Occurrence, phenotypic and molecular characterization of extended-spectrum- and AmpC-β-lactamase producing enterobacteriaceae isolated from selected commercial spinach supply chains in South Africa. Front Microbiol 11:638. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.EPA 1604. 2002. Method 1604: Total coliforms and Escherichia coli in water by membrane filtration using a simultaneous detection technique (MI Medium). United States Environmental Protection Agency EPA-821-R-02–024. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Micallef SA, Rosenberg Goldstein RE, George A, Kleinfelter L, Boyer MS, McLaughlin CR, Estrin A, Ewing L, Jean-Gilles Beaubrun J, Hanes DE, Kothary MH, Tall BD, Razeq JH, Joseph SW, Sapkota AR. 2012. Occurrence and antibiotic resistance of multiple Salmonella serotypes recovered from water, sediment and soil on mid-Atlantic tomato farms. Environ Res 114:31–39. 10.1016/j.envres.2012.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jinneman KC, Yoshitomi KJ, Weagant SD. 2003. Multiplex real-time pcr method to identify shiga toxin genes stx1 and stx2 and Escherichia coli O157:H7/H− serotype. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:6327–6333. 10.1128/AEM.69.10.6327-6333.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.CLSI. 2020. Performance standard for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 30th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gerdes ME, Cruz-Cano R, Solaiman S, Ammons S, Allard SM, Sapkota AR, Micallef SA, Goldstein RER. 2022. Impact of irrigation water type and sampling frequency on microbial water quality profiles required for compliance with U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act Produce Safety Rule standards. Environmental Res 205:112480. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Araújo S, Silva IAT, Tacão M, Patinha C, Alves A, Henriques I. 2017. Characterization of antibiotic resistant and pathogenic Escherichia coli in irrigation water and vegetables in household farms. Int J Food Microbiol 257:192–200. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Corzo-Ariyama HA, García-Heredia A, Heredia N, García S, León J, Jaykus L, Solís-Soto L. 2019. Phylogroups, pathotypes, biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolates in farms and packing facilities of tomato, jalapeño pepper and cantaloupe from Northern Mexico. Int J Food Microbiol 290:96–104. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Higgins J, Hohn C, Hornor S, Frana M, Denver M, Joerger R. 2007. Genotyping of Escherichia coli from environmental and animal samples. J Microbiol Methods 70:227–235. 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mosquito S, Pons MJ, Riveros M, Ruiz J, Ochoa TJ. 2015. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli phylogroups are associated with antibiotic resistance and duration of diarrheal episode. The Scientific World J 2015:1–6. 10.1155/2015/610403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Njage PMK, Buys EM. 2015. Pathogenic and commensal E scherichia coli from irrigation water show potential in transmission of extended spectrum and AmpC β‐lactamases determinants to isolates from lettuce. Microb Biotechnol 8:462–473. 10.1111/1751-7915.12234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim H-S, Chon J-W, Kim Y-J, Kim D-H, Kim M, Seo K-H. 2015. Prevalence and characterization of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in ready-to-eat vegetables. Int J Food Microbiol 207:83–86. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Song J, Oh S-S, Kim J, Shin J. 2020. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from raw vegetables in South Korea. Sci Rep 10:19721. 10.1038/s41598-020-76890-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Montero L, Irazabal J, Cardenas P, Graham JP, Trueba G. 2021. Extended-Spectrum Beta-lactamase producing-Escherichia coli isolated from irrigation waters and produce in Ecuador. Front Microbiol 12:709418. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.709418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kawamura K, Nagano N, Suzuki M, Wachino J, Kimura K, Arakawa Y. 2017. ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Its Rapid Rise among Healthy People. Food Saf (Tokyo) 5:122–150. 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2017011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gekenidis M-T, Rigotti S, Hummerjohann J, Walsh F, Drissner D. 2020. Long-term persistence of blaCTX-M-15 in soil and lettuce after introducing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli via manure or water. Microorganisms 8:1646. 10.3390/microorganisms8111646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Vital P, Zara E, Paraoan C, Dimasupil M, Abello J, Santos I, Rivera W. 2018. Antibiotic resistance and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production of Escherichia coli isolated from irrigation waters in selected urban farms in Metro Manila, Philippines. Water 10:548. 10.3390/w10050548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gekenidis M-T, Qi W, Hummerjohann J, Zbinden R, Walsh F, Drissner D. 2018. Antibiotic-resistant indicator bacteria in irrigation water: high prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli. PLoS One 13:e0207857. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dolejska M, Papagiannitsis CC. 2018. Plasmid-mediated resistance is going wild. Plasmid 99:99–111. 10.1016/j.plasmid.2018.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Blaak H, Lynch G, Italiaander R, Hamidjaja RA, Schets FM, de Roda Husman AM. 2015. Multidrug-resistant and extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in Dutch surface water and wastewater. PLoS One 10:e0127752. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Panthi S, Sapkota AR, Raspanti G, Allard SM, Bui A, Craddock HA, Murray R, Zhu L, East C, Handy E, Callahan MT, Haymaker J, Kulkarni P, Anderson B, Craighead S, Gartley S, Vanore A, Betancourt WQ, Duncan R, Foust D, Sharma M, Micallef SA, Gerba C, Parveen S, Hashem F, May E, Kniel K, Pop M, Ravishankar S, Sapkota A. 2019. Pharmaceuticals, herbicides, and disinfectants in agricultural water sources. Environ Res 174:1–8. 10.1016/j.envres.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ben Said L, Jouini A, Klibi N, Dziri R, Alonso CA, Boudabous A, Ben Slama K, Torres C. 2015. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in vegetables, soil and water of the farm environment in Tunisia. Int J Food Microbiol 203:86–92. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Reich F, Atanassova V, Klein G. 2013. Extended-spectrum β-Lactamase– and AmpC-producing enterobacteria in healthy broiler chickens. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1253–1259. 10.3201/eid1908.120879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Edwards U, Rogall T, Blöcker H, Emde M, Böttger EC. 1989. Isolation and direct complete nucleotide determination of entire genes: Characterization of a gene coding for 16S ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res 17:7843–7853. 10.1093/nar/17.19.7843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Micallef SA, Shiaris MP, Colón-Carmona A. 2009. Influence of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions on rhizobacterial communities and natural variation in root exudates. J Experimental Botany 60:1729–1742. 10.1093/jxb/erp053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pagani L, Dell'Amico E, Migliavacca R, D'Andrea MM, Giacobone E, Amicosante G, Romero E, Rossolini GM. 2003. Multiple CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases in nosocomial isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from a hospital in Northern Italy. J Clin Microbiol 41:4264–4269. 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4264-4269.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Olesen I, Hasman H, Møller Aarestrup F. 2004. Prevalence of β-lactamases among ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli and Salmonella isolated from food animals in Denmark. Microb Drug Resist 10:334–340. 10.1089/mdr.2004.10.334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dierikx C, van Essen-Zandbergen A, Veldman K, Smith H, Mevius D. 2010. Increased detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli isolates from poultry. Vet Microbiol 145:273–278. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




