Skip to main content
Radiology Case Reports logoLink to Radiology Case Reports
. 2022 Aug 5;17(10):3767–3769. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.07.036

A case of aqueductal obstruction by web with no sign except a headache

Fariba Zarei a,b, Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani a,, Pooya Iranpour a,b, Sepideh Sefidbakht a,b
PMCID: PMC9364052  PMID: 35965940

Abstract

Aqueductal stenosis can be a silent disease that can present in a patient for years without any signs and symptoms. This silence can occur due to CSF flow dynamics compensation, and it can continue until the increase in CSF production so that the symptoms may appear during adolescence or even later. In this study, we report an aqueduct obstruction by web, who had no symptoms except a headache and was referred for MRI in his early thirty. The patient was referred to find the cause of his episodes of headaches. If he did not follow up on his headache, he might never know about his disorder.

Keywords: Aqueductal obstruction by web, Aqueduct of Sylvius, Hydrocephalus, MRI, Compensated, Headache episodes

Introduction

Since 1842, there have been some reports of observing the cases with occlusion of the aqueduct of Sylvius [1,2]. However, they were not taken seriously and considered just as rare until 1920, when the previous literature was gathered by Walter et al., who had previously researched hydrocephalus patients. They published some reports regarding hydrocephalus patients and subdivided this disease into communicating and obstructive groups [3,4]. Since then, numerous studies have been published on aqueductal obstruction and its diagnosis's importance [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

The third and the fourth ventricle of the brain connect through the aqueduct of Sylvius. This channel, with a cross-section area of 0.5 mm2 and 0.8 mm2 in children and adults, respectively, is the narrowest part of the Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) path. As a result of its small size, there is a significant possibility of its blockage, which leads to increased brain ventricle volumes because the CSF accumulates in the brain ventricles that can, in turn, cause an increase in ventricle pressure [10,11].

This disease can be congenital or extrinsically/intrinsically acquired. As a congenital disease, it is rare, with an estimated incidence of 1:5000 births. In these cases, there can be an aqueductal web, or it may produce as a result of gliosis. Tectal plate glioma, Pineal or posterior fossa tumor, or cerebral vascular malformations are the compressive causes that can extrinsically obscure this channel. Different infections such as meningitis or ventriculitis and subarachnoid hemorrhage are the intrinsic cause of this disease.

Aqueductal stenosis can be a silent disease that can present in a patient for years without any signs and symptoms. This silence can occur due to CSF flow dynamics compensation, and it can continue until the increase in CSF production so that the symptoms may appear during adolescence or even later.

In addition, head trauma or hemorrhage can also intensify the obstruction and result in the appearance of the symptoms because the disease increases the intracranial pressure so that the symptoms include: a headache, nausea, and vomiting.

In this study, we report an aqueduct obstruction by web, who did not have symptoms except headache and was referred for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRI) in his early thirty.

Case report

A 30-year-old man presented with a long history of headache episodes was referred for an MRI. He had no history of other symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, blurry vision, or other disorders such as meningitis.

Sagittal and transverse cross-sections of the brain were assessed using a Siemens-Avanto 1.5 T MRI with T1 and T2 weighted pulse sequences. A dilatation was found in the third and lateral ventricles, while the fourth ventricle was normal in size. Corpus callosum and splenium pushed upward due to the dilation of the lateral ventricle. A thin membrane was observed at the distal part of the aqueduct. There was no other remarkable finding in the MR images. Sagittal T1 image (Fig. 1) shows the web, which leads to aqueductal stenosis. Axial T1 and T2 images (Fig. 2) show the dilation of brain ventricles.

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

T1 sagittal of a 30-year-old man which shows dilation of third and lateral ventricles. A thin membrane can be seen in the distal part of the aqueduct.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

Right) T2 transverse, Left) T1 transverse of the brain which show the dilation of brain ventricles.

The patient did not accept any treatment such as lumbar puncture or surgery because he believed the headaches were not that serious and needed further follow-up.

Discussion and conclusion

This report introduced a case of aqueduct obstruction by the web; a 30-year-old man was referred to the MRI section with a history of headaches. The MR images revealed that he is a case of hydrocephalus due to aqueduct obstruction by the web. Since he did not have any other severe symptoms besides episodes of headache, he was categorized as compensated aqueductal obstruction case.

Previously there were some reports about aqueductal stenosis patients without severe symptoms who were diagnosed as compensated aqueductal obstruction by web [12], [13], [14]. Most patients with this disorder who do not have severe symptoms are referred before the age of 30.

The mechanism of compensation is not precise so far; however, some studies have described 3 probable reasons such as the presence of a partially patent aqueduct that allows normal passage of CSF fluid, the presence of a substitute CSF passageway, or alteration of CSF production in these patients [15,16].

Routinely, these patients have an exacerbated headache following a trauma that led to intraventricular or subarachnoid hemorrhages or a viral infection. Some studies declared that these incidents could worsen these patients' headaches [17], [18], [19]. Also, it is believed that there is a possibility of completing the partial stenosis of the aqueduct [18].

In this case, no trauma or infection happened, and the headache had not been worsening. The patient was referred just to find the cause of his episodes of headaches. If he did not follow up on his headaches, he might never know about his disorder.

Patient consent

The authors have obtained a written informed consent from the patient to publish his case (including publication of images).

Footnotes

Competing Interests: All authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Magendie F. In: Mequignon-Marvis, editor. Librarie medicale de mequignon-Marvi fils; Paris: 1842. Recherches physiologiques et cliniques sur le liquide cephalo-rachidien ou cerebro-spinal. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bourneville M., Noir J. Hydrocephalie. Prog Med Paris. 1900;12:17–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dandy WE. Internal hydrocephalus. An experimental, clinical and pathological study. Am J Dis Child. 1914;8:406–482. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hydrocephalus I. Second paper, Dandy. Am J Dis Child. 1917;14:424–443. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vinals F, et al. Two-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of the fetal cerebral aqueduct: improving the antenatal diagnosis and counseling of aqueductal stenosis. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;42(4):278–284. doi: 10.1159/000458439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Viñals F, Ruiz P, Quiroz G, Guerra F, Correa F, Puerto B. OP01. 07: visualisation and measurement of fetal cerebral aqueduct: improving the US diagnosis of aqueductal stenosis. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;48(S1):53. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feletti A, Fiorindi A, Longatti P. Split cerebral aqueduct: a neuroendoscopic illustration. Child's Nervous Syst. 2016;32(1):199–203. doi: 10.1007/s00381-015-2827-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ibáñez-Botella G, González-García L, Carrasco-Brenes A, Ros-López B, Arráez-Sánchez MÁ. LOVA: the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy and a new proposal for diagnostic criteria. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40(4):605–611. doi: 10.1007/s10143-017-0813-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gholampour S, Fatouraee N, Seddighi AS, Seddighi A. Evaluating the effect of hydrocephalus cause on the manner of changes in the effective parameters and clinical symptoms of the disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;35:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hirsch J, Hirsch E, Sainte Rose C, Renier D, Pierre-Khan A. Stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius. Etiology and treatment. J Neurosurg Sci. 1985;30(1-2):29–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Magram G. Aqueduct of Sylvius. 2014:254–255. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Flora N, Kulasekaran N, Mudali S, Swaminathan T. Compensated aqueduct of sylvius obstruction by web-a case report. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2005;15(1):19. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cinalli G, Spennato P, Nastro A, Aliberti F, Trischitta V, Ruggiero C, et al. Hydrocephalus in aqueductal stenosis. Child's Nervous Syst. 2011;27(10):1621. doi: 10.1007/s00381-011-1546-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Seiler FA, Lew SM. Aqueductal stenosis presenting as isolated tremor: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010;46(5):392–395. doi: 10.1159/000323419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johnston IH, Howman-Giles R, Whittle IR. The arrest of treated hydrocephalus in children: a radionuclide study. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(4):752–756. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.4.0752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Oi S, Shimoda M, Shibata M, Honda Y, Togo K, Shinoda M, et al. Pathophysiology of long-standing overt ventriculomegaly in adults. J Neurosurg. 2000;92(6):933–940. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.0933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lapras C, Bret P, Patet J, Huppert J, Honorato D. Hydrocephalus and aqueduct stenosis. Direct surgical treatment by interventriculostomy (aqueduct canulation) J Neurosurg Sci. 1985;30(1-2):47–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nugent GR, Al-Mefty O, Chou S. Communicating hydrocephalus as a cause of aqueductal stenosis. J Neurosurg. 1979;51(6):812–818. doi: 10.3171/jns.1979.51.6.0812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Howard F, Till K, Carter C. A family study of hydrocephalus resulting from aqueduct stenosis. J Med Genet. 1981;18(4):252–255. doi: 10.1136/jmg.18.4.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Radiology Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES