Abstract
An introduction justified by two noteworthy novelties seems appropriate at the start of the Paleopathology session of the G-Paleo study group.
It is indeed the first time that a conference on Pathological Anatomy or Paleopathology deals with the topic of Recognition of the Relics of Saints, Blesseds, Venerables and Servants of God.
As a matter of fact, paleopathology is successfully applied to investigate the mummies of notables and nobles, politicians, artists and even clergymen, by studying diseases in ancient times. Professor Gino Fornaciari, while still a recognised master in this field, was undoubtedly also a pioneer.
In parallel to this great theme, some interest has gradually developed in the remains of people who were outstanding examples of faith, wisdom, piety, and charity within the Church.
The whole process was initiated thirty years ago, in 1991, by the journal Pathologica in an attempt to outline the issues and procedures to be followed by pathologists when appointed to perform Canonical Recognitions.
In 1995, this systematisation work produced the first cataloguing survey aimed at identifying the number of mummified bodies - the so-called Distinguished Relics -, the types of mummification, as well as the distribution of cases throughout Italy. In addition to compiling a very detailed catalogue, a number of artificially mummified subjects were also identified, thus documenting embalming practices that had flourished in a well circumscribed geographic area and within a particular religious and cultural context.
In 2000, hosted by the young Luca Ventura, we organized a conference in L’Aquila entitled: “The distinguished relics of the Saints: where history, science and devotion meet” with the aim to emphasize the great importance of distinguished relics, not only for the Church, but also for the scientific world and Paleopathology in particular.
Participants in this wide-ranging conference included leading palaeopathologists and representatives from the Ministry of Cultural Heritage, experts in the preservation of bodies, historians and also Msgr. Saraiva Martins, Prefect of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints, who shortly afterwards would be appointed Cardinal.
Not to forget them, it is worth mentioning the titles of the papers that were presented: Fulcheri E.: Protection of Cultural heritage: Biological Archives; Saraiva Martins J.: Saints’Relics: Meaning and Tradition; Capasso L.: The Ministry of Cultural Heritage in the preservation of the Relics of the Saints; Grilletto R.. Between Natural and Artificial Mummies; Fornaciari G.: Embalming Practices in the Monastic Environment of Umbria in the Late Middle Ages; Ventura L.: Histopathology of Mummified Tissues; Fulcheri E.: The Recognition of the Relics of the Saints; Gabrielli N.: Treatments on the Bodies and Relics of the Servants of God; Fulcheri E.: Future Perspectives and Closing of the Session.
Hence, after 20 years of work, the current session is not a point of arrival, but a starting point to develop, within a scientific environment, a theme characterised by two adjectives: ‘relevant and sensitivè.
The second novelty worth mentioning refers to this very approach.
In 2017, the Instructions of the Congregation for the Causes of Saints on “Relics in the Church: Authenticity and Preservation” were published. They contain some very important regulations and some particularly interesting novelties for our scientific-disciplinary field.
In PART II, Diocesan or Eparchial Phase of the specific operations that can be carried out, in Title I, Initial Acts, in Article 9 we read:
“The Bishop or the Episcopal Delegate is to nominate a medical expert (anatomical pathologist, medical examiner or another specialized doctor) and, if necessary, an assistant medical expert (autopsy technician), as well as others charged with performing the technical aspects of the work”
This is the first time that the role of the pathologist is expressly recognised in carrying out investigations aimed at diagnosing the state of disease, thanatology, and preservation conditions. This article also expressly mentions the role of the assistant medical expert (Autopsy Technician) with specific dissection skills.
In Title II, Specific operations, Chapter I: Canonical examination, Article 16 reads as follows:
“§1. When these procedures have been completed, the anatomical experts are to inspect carefully the relics of the Blessed or of the Saint or the mortal remains of the Servant of God or of the Venerable.
§ 2. Furthermore, they are to identify analytically all the parts of the body, to describe in a detailed manner their state, and they are to put their findings down in a Report signed by them and attached to the acts.”
Under these provisions, a comprehensive report of the examination must be produced, similar to a detailed post-mortem report.
Article 17 then covers the issue of conservative treatment and any necessary histopathological and laboratory investigations in a broader sense.
“Whenever the canonical recognition makes evident the necessity or the opportuneness of performing treatments for their preservation, after having obtained the consent of the Bishop, such treatments are to be performed by applying the most accredited techniques in that place and in the ways which the anatomical experts or other experts shall establish.”
At the end of Title III, Final Acts, we read in Article 30:
“The images and information, taken from the anatomical treatments and all the procedures performed, must not be divulged or made public without the written authorization of the competent Bishop and that of the possible heir”.
Although this document is only briefly quoted here, it offers us a great opportunity to think about the objectives, required skills, and the procedures to be implemented during the recognition of the relics of Saints, Blesseds, Venerables and Servants of God.
It should also be mentioned here that in many cases canonical recognitions, carried out to ensure the authenticity and preservation of mortal remains, are also an opportunity for research studies. When properly authorised, they are going to shed light on unique, sometimes still little known aspects of the life of the investigated individual, with confused hagiographic descriptions that have somehow blurred the contours of the human, anthropological and pathological profile affecting their health conditions.
The role of pathologists and their specific expertise in modern pathology and the study of diseases of the past are now well defined even in this delicate and fascinating field. While for believers this field of research enriches the history of the Church in its path of faith and charity, for agnostics it stimulates interesting and unique cultural insights.