Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC Mpox Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC Mpox Collection
letter
. 2022 Aug 11;49:102425. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102425

Laboratory diagnostics for monkeypox: An overview of sensitivities from various published tests

Zhiwen Jiang 1,1, Jiumeng Sun 1,1, Letian Zhang 1,1, Shiyu Yan 1, Dongyan Li 1, Chang Zhang 1, Alexander Lai 2, Shuo Su 3,
PMCID: PMC9365520  PMID: 35963557

Monkeypox has been declared a “public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC)” by World Health Organization on July 23, 2022. This sudden and unexpected global outbreak of monkeypox virus (MPXV) raises significant concern [1], particularly in view of the on-going COVID-19 pandemic. From January 1 through June 22, 2022, a total of fifty countries with a total of 3413 laboratory confirmed cases have been reported. The majority of confirmed cases were from Europe and the Americas, with total no. and percentage at 2933, 86%, and 381, 11%, respectively (https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON396). These statistics are expected to increase. Furthermore, Singapore and South Korea have reported imported cases of monkeypox, indicating a worsening of global spread by international travels. Laboratory diagnostic tests with high sensitivity and specificity are essential for early detection and case screening to reduce further MPXV spread.

Whereas transmission is thought to be through direct contact [2], recent reports had highlighted the unusual concentration among men who have sex with men (MSM), and among bisexual population, suggesting a unique transmission of the virus in these populations. The mechanism of transmission during sexual contact remains unknown. Although infectious MPXV has been found in semen, and MPXV DNA was detected in urine, feces, rectal swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and saliva in a recent report [3]. However, whether the virus can infect semen cells and reproduce in the genital tract remains unknown.

Monkeypox infection is a viral zoonosis. Infection results in characteristic overt lesions, similar to that of smallpox. Clinical presentations include fever and swollen lymph nodes, followed by a centrifugal evolving rash [2]. Interestingly, there are several unique clinical features of this current monkeypox outbreak, e.g., only few lesions appear, and at different stages of development, the distribution is either exclusively peri-genital and/or peri-anal, and the lesions appear to be ulcerated with umbilicated pustules [4].

In addition to clinical presentations, confirmatory diagnosis of monkeypox requires nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), i.e., PCR using various targets in the viral genome, to detect and to differentiate from other poxviruses. Several diagnostic assays had been well established from previous monkeypox outbreaks (Table 1 ). Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) alone, or in combination with sequencing, was recommended by the WHO. We had critically examined with respect to their sensitivities three methods listed in the Interim Guidance by WHO [5] (Table 1).

Table 1.

List of assays for detecting monkeypox virus infections. The three assays by the WHO Interim guidance for detecting monkeypox virus infections are in bold.

Detection technique Viruses detected Target viral gene Limit of detection Reference Specimen type
RT-qPCR West African strain G2R 1.7 fg (∼8.2 genome) https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166-0934(10)00254-5 Preference types: the swabs of lesion surface or exudate, roofs from multiple lesion, or lesion crusts.
Additional types: the swabs of semen, urine, rectal or genital, venous whole blood collected in EDTA.
Congo Basin strain C3L 9.46 fg (∼40.4 genomes)
MPXV generic G2R 0.7 fg (∼3.5 genomes)
RT-qPCR Variola virus B12R 20 copies/reaction https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166-0934(16)30067-2
Monkeypox virus F3L 20 copies/reaction
Varicella-zoster virus ORF38 50 copies/reaction
RT-qPCR Orthopoxvirus Viral core cysteine proteinase 22.08 copies/reaction https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0890-8508(09)00077-2
Molluscipoxvirus MC036R 9.7 copies/reaction
Parapoxvirus Envelope protein 28.1 copies/reaction
Digital PCR Nonvariola (NVAR) orthopoxviruses E9L 9.697 copies/mL https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/28/9/22-0917_article#r9
Monkeypox virus B7R 6.359 copies/mL
Monkeypox virus Both targets combined 4.795 copies/mL
RT-qPCR Variola virus A38R 20 copies/reaction https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093411001984?via%3Dihub
Monkeypox virus B7R 20 copies/reaction
Cowpox virus D11L 50 copies/reaction
Vaccinia virus B10R 70 copies/reaction
RPA Monkeypox virus G2R 16 DNA molecules/μL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732889318307466?via%3Dihub
RT-qPCR Monkeypox virus F3L 11-55 fg (50–250 copies of each gene) https://www.nature.com/articles/3700143.pdf
N3R
PCR Monkeypox virus ATI undescribed https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093498000998?via%3Dihub
RT-qPCR Variola virus A27L 0.7 fg (∼4 copies/assay) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC404623/pdf/1612-03.pdf
Other orthopoxvirus A27L 6 copies/assay
RT-qPCR Nonvariola (NVAR) orthopoxviruses E9L 2.54 fg viral DNA (∼12.5 genomes) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653206001223
Monkeypox virus B6R ∼10 viral copies (2 fg)
GeneXpert Monkeypox virus G2R undescribed https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5303045/pdf/tropmed-96-405.pdf
Orthopoxvirus E9L undescribed
LAMP West African strain ATI 103 copies/reaction https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jmv.21494
Congo Basin strain D14L 102.4 copies/reaction
Both Congo Basin and West African strain ATI 102 copies/reaction
RT-qPCR Variola virus 14-kD protein gene 0.05 fg (25 copies/assay) https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/53/4/606/5627648?login=true
Monkeypox, cowpox and vaccinia viruses 14-kD protein gene 0.05 fg (25 copies/assay)
Microarray-based assay Variola virus C23L/B29R and B19R undescribed https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmv.20698
Monkeypox virus C23L/B29R and B19R
Ectromelia virus C23L/B29R and B19R
Camelpox virus C23L/B29R and B19R
Vaccinia virus B19R
Cowpox virus C23L/B29R and B19R
FRET RT-qPCR Cowpox virus HA 2.74–9.88 copies/PCR vial https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/50/4/702/5639914?login=true
Vaccinia virus
Camelpox virus
Variola major virus
Monkeypox virus
RT-qPCR Orthopoxvirus (camelpox, cowpox, monkeypox, virus vaccino, vaiolo) CrmB 60 copies/assay https://www.infezmed.it/index.php/article?Anno=2007&numero=1&ArticoloDaVisualizzare=Vol_15_1_2007_47
Herpes Simplex 1 virus DNApol 990 copies/assay
Herpes Simplex 2 virus DNApol 600 copies/assay
Varicella-zoster virus ORF 29 160 copies/assay
PCR Vaccinia virus F4L 20-30 PFU https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890850804000726?via%3Dihub
Cowpox virus B9R 20-30 PFU
Monkeypox virus E5R 80-100 PFU
Variola virus B11R–B12R 20-30 PFU
Vaccinia virus C9L 20-30 PFU
RT-qPCR Variola virus J7R 25 copies/assay (0.1fg) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093408002541?via%3Dihub
Camelpox, cowpox, monkeypox and vaccinia virus J7R 50 copies/assay (10 fg)
Nested-multiplex PCR Orthopoxvirus VGF 1 ng https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2749831/
Parapoxvirus B2L 1 ng

These tests, with different target sites in the viral genome, have different sensitivities and limit of detection (LOD) for different strains of monkeypox virus, and for different Orthopoxviruses (OPV). As shown in Table 1, the RT-qPCR test developed by Li et al. has a limit of detection (LOD) for the “generic” monkeypox virus (MPXV) at 0.7 fg, which is equivalent to approximately 3.5 genomes; whereas for West African strain, the LOD is at 1.7 fg (∼8.2 genome); and for the Congo Basin strain, at 9.46 fg (∼40.4 genomes). On the other hand, the RT-qPCR test developed by Maksyutov et al. targets the viral F3L gene. This assay has a LOD of 20 copies/reaction. The test developed by Schroeder et al. for detecting OPV has a LOD of 22.08 DNA copies.

These above RT-qPCR testes had been deployed to monitor MPXV infection in several countries, and in combination with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, they provide accurate detection results and at the same time, expands genome sequence information.

A person with characteristic lesions associated with monkeypox is considered infectious until the lesions crusted over and fallen off. Rapid diagnostic tests are important to detect the early stages of infection. Accurate and sensitive testing reduces spreading of the virus by appropriate mitigation strategies, and provides evidence basis for treatments, such as use of antiviral drugs or vaccination. Of note, as more viral genome sequences are available, a larger number of nucleotide polymorphisms have been observed. A revised classification has been proposed, with three main clades, MPXV clades 1, 2 and 3. This new classification scheme or nomenclature avoids discrimination of infected persons, and stigmatizing [6].

Despite cumulating cases, the natural animal reservoir of MPXV remains unknown. However, previous studies have shown that MPXV can infect several species of rodents in Africa [7], suggesting that these animals could be potential reservoirs for monkeypox virus. Also, there may be more MPXV strains in other yet-to-be-identified reservoir hosts, and posing a potential threat to humans. Therefore, continuing surveillance of MPXV from their animal reservoir is important, and more viral clades may be unveiled, further broadening the diversity of MPXV [7]. Therefore, use of previous testing methods should be taken into account of this genetic diversity, as the sensitivity and specificity may be negatively impacted by the genetic diversity of the virus.

The advantages of RT-qPCR include high sensitivity, detection of virus at earlier stages (of infection), usefulness in the surveillance of the virus, including the wildlife, and its application in molecular epidemiology, etc. However, in remote locations or in rural areas of Africa, the infrastructure may not be feasible for these molecular testing. Reducing the cost of testing, increasing the sensitivity and specificity, and developing rapid tests for point-of care (POC) for rural areas will increase the monitoring of monkeypox infection. To control this global outbreak of monkeypox, we need similar strategies as used for mitigating the current COVID-19 pandemic, i.e., early detection, develop antivirals and vaccines, and to fill the knowledge gaps regarding the viral ecology and evolution of monkeypox virus.

Declaration of conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities Y0201900459 and the Bioinformatics Center of Nanjing Agricultural University.

References


Articles from Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES