Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Medicine logoLink to Journal of Clinical Medicine
editorial
. 2022 Jul 28;11(15):4398. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154398

Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: The Urgent Need of a Clinical Test

Roberto Gasparri 1,*, Alessandra Guaglio 1, Lorenzo Spaggiari 1,2
PMCID: PMC9368855  PMID: 35956014

Globally, lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer death in men and women [1,2]. In fact, it is estimated that more people die each year from lung cancer than from colon, breast, and prostate cancer combined [3]. The main cause of these dramatic epidemiological data is the fact that there are still no adequate and effective screening methods. In fact, to date, only 15% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage [4]. On the other hand, mammography [5], fecal occult blood detection [6], and PSA screening [7] provide better results in terms of both long-term survival and cancer mortality.

Nowadays, the annual screening of high-risk populations with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is both recommended and clinically approved by the recently published NCCN 2021 guidelines for lung cancer screening [8]. However, its effectiveness in increasing survival rates is still debated, mainly because the criteria for defining high-risk groups have not yet been clearly defined [9]. In addition, the high false-positive rate, costs, and the exposure to potentially harmful radiation may limit its use in the clinical routine. In particular, overdiagnosis leading to unnecessary interventions has important effects on both health systems and the psychology of patients [10]. From a clinical point of view, most lung cancer patients are diagnosed in advanced stages or metastatic disease, overburdening the healthcare system to access combined chemo-/radiotherapy treatments, despite their poor survival and mortality rates. On the opposite, surgical treatment for resectable and operable early stage disease can not only be curative, but provides five-year survival rates after surgical resection of 30–80% compared to 2–15% for advanced or metastatic stages [11]. It is clear, therefore, that the development of better screening tools enabling early diagnosis is the key factor in improving the prognosis of lung cancer patients.

Advances in the early diagnosis of lung cancer have increased during the last decades, especially for the “OMIC” approaches such as volatolomic, genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic [12,13,14]. These techniques help to understand cancer at different levels of complexity and as an exogenous system inside the host body. Several technologies have been developed and a number of predictive biomarkers have been investigated in many platforms with promising results. Although promising, no predictive biomarkers of disease onset—indicators of the disease at an early stage before becoming symptomatic or detectable by conventional means—have proven to be clinically useful [15]. Moreover, one of the major challenges that are linked to these approaches is the large heterogeneous amount of data generated from the analysis of a single patient, which need to be translated into clinically useful information [16,17]. In this context, artificial-intelligence (AI) and machine-learning (ML) frameworks, which summarize and correlate information from several sources and provide accurate predictions, are a powerful, innovative, and potentially very efficient instrument [18].

Now is the time to focus on the prospective research for a panel of diagnostic biomarkers that can be used in the clinical setting. It is crucial to merge the work of clinicians with that of researchers to develop and validate a diagnostic tool that uses AI\ML to integrate patients’ data about tumor-specific biomarkers, identified by analyzing accessible biological samples, such as urine, blood, and exhaled breath. The costs of such analyses must be limited in order to make them reproducible and affordable even for less wealthy countries. All the researchers performing trials focusing on biomarkers for the early detection of lung cancer must set up a task force in their own country and interface with other countries with the aim of sharing results as well as exchanging knowledge. For this aim, it is important to create an Omics Big Data Bank in which all patients’ data could be recorded and analyzed sequentially, even many years after the first collection. This set of predictive data could be used as a guide by the clinicians in the decision of the follow-up program of the patient and to orientate them in the therapeutic decision. Acting as soon as possible could significantly improve disease-related quality of life and survival.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Barta J.A., Powell C.A., Wisnivesky J.P. Global Epidemiology of Lung Cancer. Ann. Glob. Health. 2019;85:8. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cancer. [(accessed on 16 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer.
  • 3.About Lung Cancer. [(accessed on 17 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/lung-cancer/about/key-statistics.html.
  • 4.Nooreldeen R., Bach H. Current and Future Development in Lung Cancer Diagnosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:8661. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.WHO Position Paper on Mammography Screening. [(accessed on 16 January 2021)]. Available online: https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2015/WHO-ENGMammography-Factsheet.pdf.
  • 6.Ladabaum U., Dominitz J.A., Kahi C., Schoen R.E. Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:418–432. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Carlsson S.V., Vickers A.J. Screening for Prostate Cancer. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2020;104:1051–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wood D.E., Kazerooni E.A., Aberle D., Berman A., Brown L.M., Eapen G.A., Ettinger D.S., Ferguson J.S., Hou L., Kadaria D., et al. Lung Cancer Screening, Version 1.2022 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2022;20:754–764. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fu F., Zhou Y., Zhang Y., Chen H. Lung cancer screening strategy for non-high-risk individuals: A narrative review. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2021;10:452–461. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chang H.T., Wang P.H., Chen W.F., Lin C.J. Risk Assessment of Early Lung Cancer with LDCT and Health Examinations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:4633. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lemjabbar-Alaoui H., Hassan O.U., Yang Y.-W., Buchanan P. Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Rev. Cancer. 2015;1856:189–210. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Menyhárt O., Győrffy B. Multi-omics approaches in cancer research with applications in tumor subtyping, prognosis, and diagnosis. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021;19:949–960. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chakraborty S., Hosen I., Ahmed M., Shekhar H.U. Onco-Multi-OMICS Approach: A New Frontier in Cancer Research. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:9836256. doi: 10.1155/2018/9836256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Heo Y.J., Hwa C., Lee G.-H., Park J.-M., An A.J.-Y. Integrative Multi-Omics Approaches in Cancer Research: From Biological Networks to Clinical Subtypes. Mol. Cells. 2021;44:433–443. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2021.0042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Seijo L.M., Peled N., Ajona D., Boeri M., Field J.K., Sozzi G., Pio R., Zulueta J.J., Spira A., Massion P.P., et al. Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening: Achievements, Promises, and Challenges. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2019;14:343–357. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bodein A., Scott-Boyer M.-P., Perin O., Cao K.-A.L., Droit A. Interpretation of network-based integration from multi-omics longitudinal data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;50:e27. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yu X.T., Zeng T. Integrative analysis of omics big data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018;1754:109–135. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7717-8_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lv J., Li J., Liu Y., Zhang H., Luo X., Ren M., Gao Y., Ma Y., Liang S., Yang Y., et al. Artificial Intelligence-Aided Diagnosis Software to Identify Highly Suspicious Pulmonary Nodules. Front. Oncol. 2022;11:749219. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.749219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES