Skip to main content
Wolters Kluwer - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wolters Kluwer - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 May 26;79(9):1971–1980. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.122.19222

Blood Pressure Control Among US Adults, 2009 to 2012 Through 2017 to 2020

Paul Muntner 1,, Miriam A Miles 2, Byron C Jaeger 3, Lonnie Hannon III 2, Shakia T Hardy 1, Yechiam Ostchega 4, Gregory Wozniak 5, Joseph E Schwartz 6,7
PMCID: PMC9370255  PMID: 35616029

Abstract

Background:

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data indicate that the proportion of US adults with hypertension that had controlled blood pressure (BP) declined from 2013 to 2014 through 2017 to 2018. We analyzed data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020 to confirm this finding.

Methods:

Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg or antihypertensive medication use. BP control among those with hypertension was defined as systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg.

Results:

The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension was 31.5% (95% CI, 30.3%–32.8%), 32.0% (95% CI, 30.6%–33.3%), and 32.9% (95% CI, 31.0%–34.7%) in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, respectively (P trend=0.218). The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension increased among non-Hispanic Asian adults from 27.0% in 2011 to 2012 to 33.5% in 2017 to 2020 (P trend=0.003). Among Hispanic adults, the age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension increased from 29.4% in 2009 to 2012 to 33.2% in 2017 to 2020 (P trend=0.029). In 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, 52.8% (95% CI, 50.0%–55.7%), 51.3% (95% CI, 47.9%–54.6%), and 48.2% (95% CI, 45.7%–50.8%) of US adults with hypertension had controlled BP (P trend=0.034). Among US adults taking antihypertensive medication, 69.9% (95% CI, 67.8%–72.0%), 69.3% (95% CI, 66.6%–71.9%), and 67.7% (95% CI, 65.2%–70.3%) had controlled BP in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, respectively (P trend=0.189). Among all US adults with hypertension and those taking antihypertensive medication, a decline in BP control between 2009 to 2012 and 2017 to 2020 occurred among those ≥75 years, women, and non-Hispanic black adults.

Conclusions:

These data confirm that the proportion of US adults with hypertension who have controlled BP has declined.

Keywords: blood pressure, epidemiology, female, hypertension, prevalence


Novelty and Relevance.

What Is New?

  • This article provides contemporary data on the proportion of US adults with hypertension who have controlled blood pressure. The prevalence of controlled blood pressure declined from 2009 to 2012 through 2017 to 2020. Declines in blood pressure control were present among US adults ≥75 years of age, non-Hispanic Black adults, and women.

What Is Relevant?

  • Uncontrolled blood pressure is common among US adults, resulting in an increased risk for cardiovascular disease. Nonpharmacological and pharmacological approaches are available to lower blood pressure among adults with hypertension.

Clinical/Pathophysiological Implications?

Programs are needed to increase blood pressure control among US adults.

High blood pressure (BP) accounts for more cardiovascular disease events in the United States than any other modifiable risk factor.1,2 Randomized trials have demonstrated that antihypertensive medication lowers BP and reduces the risk for cardiovascular disease.3,4 These trials and evidence-based BP guidelines have provided the foundation for ongoing clinical and public health efforts designed to increase BP control among US adults with hypertension.57 In turn, substantial improvements in BP control have occurred.8,9 Data from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) show that the proportion of US adults with hypertension who had controlled BP, defined by systolic BP (SBP) <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP (DBP) <90 mm Hg, increased from 31.8% in 1999 to 2000 to 53.8% in 2013 to 2014.8 However, between 2013 to 2014 and 2017 to 2018, the improvement in BP control was reversed. According to NHANES 2017 to 2018, 43.7% of US adults with hypertension had controlled BP.

See Editorial Commentary, pp 1981–1983

NHANES data collected in January 2019 through March 2020 before the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the survey being halted or provide the opportunity to assess whether or not the decline in BP control has continued.10 The primary goal of the current study was to estimate the proportion of US adults with hypertension who had controlled BP in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, using the NHANES data preceding the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. Additionally, we assessed the prevalence of hypertension, or the mean SBP and DBP, the distribution of BP levels, hypertension awareness among those with hypertension, and antihypertensive medication use among those who were aware they had hypertension.

Methods

NHANES is a cross-sectional survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population, conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A description of its design and data collection methods is available on the survey website.11 The current analysis included six 2-year NHANES cycles, from 2009 to 2010 through 2019 to 2020. Multiple NHANES cycles can be combined to provide more stable statistical estimates.12 The data collection for the NHANES 2019 to 2020 cycle was stopped in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and consequently the National Center for Health Statistics has only made the 2019 to 2020 data available combined with the 2017 to 2018 data, adjusted to achieve 48 primary sampling units.10 Therefore, we analyzed data from NHANES 2017 to 2020, and for comparability, we combined earlier NHANES cycles to have three 4-year periods: 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020. The protocols for each NHANES cycle were approved by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Data Collection

Data for the current analysis were collected through interviews conducted in participants’ homes followed by a physical examination and laboratory specimen collection in a mobile examination center. Age, sex, and race-ethnicity were self-reported. Before the NHANES 2011 to 2012 cycle, the public use NHANES data set provided information on race-ethnicity as non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic including Mexican American and other Hispanic, and other. Beginning in 2011 to 2012, the public use NHANES data set provided information on non-Hispanic Asian adults as a separate group.

BP Measurement and Antihypertensive Medication Use

For each participant, BP measurements took place during a single examination visit. From 2009 to 2010 through 2017 to 2018, a physician measured BP using a mercury sphygmomanometer (Bauman true gravity mercury wall model) with standard Bauman cuffs.13 For 2017 to 2018 and 2019 to 2020, a health technician measured BP using a validated oscillometric device (Omron 907 XL).14 Based on a rigorous evaluation of the differences in mean SBP and DBP when measured by the two devices among 4417 NHANES 2017 to 2018 participants, auscultatory (mercury sphygmomanometer) minus oscillometric (Omron 907XL) was +1.5 mm Hg (P<0.001) and –1.3 mm Hg (P<0.01), respectively. Based on these data, we added 1.5 mm Hg to oscillometric-measured SBP and subtracted 1.3 mm Hg from oscillometric-measured DBP for participants in 2017 to 2020, to calibrate the oscillometric device values to the mercury device values.15 The BP measurements from the auscultatory device for participants in the NHANES 2017 to 2018 cycle are not available in the 2017 to 2020 NHANES data set. Consistent with prior NHANES analyses, the average of up to 3 brachial SBP and DBP values was used regardless of the device.16,17 If a participant had only 1 or 2 readings, these readings were used.

Definitions of Hypertension, Awareness, Treatment, and BP Control

Hypertension was defined according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guideline as SBP ≥140 mm Hg or DBP ≥90 mm Hg or self-reported antihypertensive medication use.18 Awareness of having hypertension was defined by answering yes to the question “Have you ever been told by a doctor or other health care professional that you had hypertension, also called high blood pressure?” Taking antihypertensive medication was defined by answering yes to the question “Are you now taking prescribed medication for high blood pressure?” The primary outcome was BP control among all adults with hypertension, which was defined as SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg. As a secondary outcome, we assessed BP control among adults taking antihypertensive medication.

Statistical Analysis

We restricted the analyses to NHANES participants who were ≥18 years of age and completed the NHANES interview and examination (n=32 599). Participants who were pregnant (n=347) and those without any SBP and DBP measurements from the NHANES examination (n=1891) were excluded. Also, 50 participants who were missing information on antihypertensive medication use were excluded. After these exclusions were applied, 30 311 participants were included in the analyses (Figure S1).

For each period (2009–2012, 2013–2016, and 2017–2020), we estimated the age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension for the overall population and in subgroups defined by age (18–44, 45–64, 65–74, and ≥75 years), sex, and race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic). We estimated the distribution of age, sex, and race-ethnicity and the age-adjusted mean SBP and DBP and age-adjusted distribution of BP categories (SBP/DBP <120/80, 120–129/<80, 130–139/80–89, 140–159/90–99, and ≥160/100 mm Hg) for US adults with hypertension in each period.

For each period, the age-adjusted proportion of US adults who had controlled BP was estimated for those with hypertension and those taking antihypertensive medication in the overall population and in age, sex, and race-ethnicity subgroups. Additionally, we calculated the age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension who were aware of their condition and the age-adjusted proportion taking antihypertensive medication among those aware for the overall population and in age, sex, and race-ethnicity subgroups. In a sensitivity analysis, we estimated the age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension who had controlled BP in 5 time periods (2009–2010, 2011–2012, 2013–2014, 2015–2016, and 2017–2020). In a second sensitivity analysis, the age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension and with controlled BP, among US adults with hypertension and among those taking antihypertensive medication, was estimated without adjusting the oscillometric BP values. The above analyses were repeated defining hypertension and BP control according to the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) BP guideline. Using this guideline, hypertension was defined as SBP ≥130 mm Hg or DBP ≥80 mm Hg, and self-reported antihypertensive medication use and BP control among those with hypertension was defined as SBP <130 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg.5

The presence of linear trends from 2009 to 2012 through 2017 to 2020 was assessed using logistic regression and modeling the midpoint of each time period. Age adjustment was performed using direct standardization with the age distribution of the standard population set to all US adults in 2009 to 2020 when estimating the prevalence of hypertension (18–44 years, 45.8%; 45–64 years, 34.9%; 65–74 years, 11.7%; and ≥75 years, 7.6%) and US adults with hypertension in 2009 to 2020 (18–44 years, 13.5%; 45–64 years, 45.3%; 65–74 years, 23.3%; and ≥75 years, 17.8%) for the remainder of the analyses. All estimates were weighted using the NHANES examination sample weights. The calculated variance estimates accounted for the complex survey design by using Taylor series linearization. Data analysis was conducted using Stata V17 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).

Results

The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension was 31.5%, 32.0%, and 32.9% in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, respectively (Table 1; P trend=0.218). The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension increased among non-Hispanic Asian adults from 27.0% in 2011 to 2012 to 33.5% in 2017 to 2020 (P trend=0.003). Among Hispanic adults, the age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension increased from 29.4% in 2009 to 2012 to 33.2% in 2017 to 2020 (P trend=0.029). There was no evidence of a trend in the age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension among non-Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black adults, in any age group, or among women or men.

Table 1.

Age-Specific and Age-Adjusted Prevalence of Hypertension Among US Adults in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, overall and in Age, Sex, and Race-Ethnicity Subgroups

graphic file with name hyp-79-1971-g001.jpg

The proportion of US adults with hypertension who were non-Hispanic White declined from 70.4% in 2009 to 2012 to 64.8% in 2017 to 2020 (Table 2). In 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, the age-adjusted mean SBP was 135, 137, and 137 mm Hg, respectively, and the age-adjusted mean DBP was 73, 73, and 78 mm Hg, respectively. The age-adjusted proportion of US adults with SBP/DBP of 140 to 159/90 to 99 mm Hg and ≥160/100 mm Hg was 35.8% and 11.4%, respectively, in 2009 to 2012, 37.4% and 11.3%, respectively, in 2013 to 2016, and 38.5% and 13.2%, respectively, in 2017 to 2020.

Table 2.

Demographic Characteristics and Age-Adjusted Mean Blood Pressure and Distribution of Blood Pressure Categories Among US Adults With Hypertension in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020

graphic file with name hyp-79-1971-g002.jpg

Among all US adults with hypertension, the age-adjusted proportion with controlled BP declined from 52.8% in 2009 to 2012 to 48.2% in 2017 to 2020 (Figure [A]; Table S1; P trend=0.034). The age-specific proportion of US adults with controlled BP declined among those ≥75 years of age, while the age-adjusted proportion with controlled BP declined among women and non-Hispanic Black adults (each P trend, <0.05). Among US adults with hypertension taking antihypertensive medication, the age-adjusted proportion with controlled BP was 69.9%, 69.3%, and 67.7% in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, respectively (Figure [B]; Table S1; P trend=0.189). Among US adults ≥75 years of age who were taking antihypertensive medication, the proportion with controlled BP declined and the age-adjusted proportion with controlled BP declined among women and non-Hispanic Black adults (each P trend, <0.05). When 5 time periods, from 2009-to-2010 to 2017-to-2020, were analyzed, a decline in the age-specific or age-adjusted proportion with BP control, among all US adults with hypertension and those taking antihypertensive medication, was present for those ≥75 years of age, women, and non-Hispanic Black adults (Table S2; each P trend, <0.05). The age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension and with controlled BP among those with hypertension and among those taking antihypertensive medication without calibrating the oscillometric BP values for NHANES 2017 to 2020 participants is shown in Tables S3 and S4.

Figure.

Figure.

Age-specific and age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension that had controlled blood pressure. Age-specific and age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension (A) and taking antihypertensive medication (B) who had controlled blood pressure in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, overall and in subgroups. P trends were calculated using logistic regression and modeling the midpoint of each time period. NH indicates non-Hispanic.

The age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension who were aware they had hypertension declined from 82.4% in 2009 to 2012 to 79.1% in 2017 to 2020 (Table 3; P trend=0.049). Declines in the age-specific or age-adjusted proportion with hypertension awareness occurred among US adults ≥75 years of age, women, and non-Hispanic Black adults (each P trend, <0.05). Among those aware they had hypertension, the age-adjusted proportion that were taking antihypertensive medication was 91.9% in 2009 to 2012, 89.2% in 2013 to 2016, and 90.6% in 2017 to 2020 (P trend, 0.273). The age-adjusted proportion of non-Hispanic Black adults taking antihypertensive medication declined from 90.9% in 2009 to 2012 to 87.1% in 2017 to 2020 (P=0.023).

Table 3.

Age-Specific and Age-Adjusted Proportion of US Adults With Hypertension Who Reported Being Aware They Had Hypertension and Were Taking Antihypertensive Medication Among Those Who Were Aware They Had Hypertension in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, Overall and in Subgroups

graphic file with name hyp-79-1971-g004.jpg

Results Defining Hypertension and BP Control Using the 2017 ACC/AHA BP Guideline

The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline was 45.8%, 45.3%, and 46.5% in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, respectively (Table S5; P trend=0.638). The age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension increased among non-Hispanic Asian adults (P trend=0.017) while there was no evidence of a trend in the age-specific or age-adjusted prevalence of hypertension in the other subgroups investigated. Demographic characteristics, the mean age-adjusted SBP and DBP, and the age-adjusted distribution of BP categories among US adults with hypertension defined by the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline are presented in Table S6. In 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020, the age-adjusted proportion with controlled BP was 25.8%, 24.8%, and 24.3% (P trend=0.417), respectively, among all US adults with hypertension and 45.2%, 45.0%, and 43.4% (P trend=0.453), respectively, among US adults taking antihypertensive medication (Table S7). There was no evidence of a change in the age-adjusted proportion with controlled BP when 5 periods, from 2009-to-2010 to 2017-to-2020, were evaluated (Table S8). The age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension and with controlled BP without calibrating the oscillometric BP values for NHANES 2017 to 2020 participants is shown in Tables S9 and S10. The age-adjusted proportion of US adults with hypertension who were aware they had the condition was 65.5%, 66.9%, and 64.4% in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020 (P trend=0.963), respectively, and the age-adjusted proportion taking antihypertensive medication among those with hypertension awareness was 85.2%, 82.9%, and 84.2% in 2009 to 2012, 2013 to 2016, and 2017 to 2020 (P trend=0.453), respectively (Table S11).

Discussion

According to NHANES data analyzed in the current study, the age-adjusted proportion of US adults with controlled BP, defined by SBP <140 mm Hg and DBP <90 mm Hg, declined between 2009 to 2012 and 2017 to 2020. There was no evidence of a trend from 2009-to-2012 to 2017-to-2020 in the proportion of US adults taking antihypertensive medication who had controlled BP. Among all US adults with hypertension and those taking antihypertensive medication, a decline in BP control occurred among US adults ≥75 years of age, women, and non-Hispanic Black adults.

The decline in, and low proportion with, BP control among US adults ≥ 75 years of age, women and non-Hispanic black adults may contribute to increasing health disparities. The rates of BP-related outcomes including stroke and heart failure are higher in older versus younger adults and non-Hispanic black versus non-Hispanic White adults.1921 While women have a lower risk of stroke than men, the association of higher BP with stroke is stronger among women versus men.22,23 Additionally, the lifetime risk of heart failure is similar among women and men, but the association of hypertension with heart failure was stronger among women versus men in the Original Framingham Heart Study and Framingham Offspring Study.24 Antihypertensive medication is equally effective for preventing cardiovascular disease in older and younger adults, women and men, and people who self-identify as being non-Hispanic Black versus those identifying with other race-ethnicity.2527

In 2014, a report from the Panel Members appointed to Eighth Joint National Committee recommended a higher SBP goal, 150 mm Hg, among some older adults compared with the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guideline.28 It has been suggested that guidelines have a substantial influence on antihypertensive treatment and achievement of BP goals.29,30 Concerns were raised that this recommendation in the Eighth Joint National Committee panel member report would result in worsening BP control among US adults.31 Whether publication of the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guideline, which lowered the BP goal compared with the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure and the Eighth Joint National Committee panel member report, resulted in an increase in BP control and attenuation of health disparities remains to be determined.

The results of the current study are consistent with a previous NHANES analysis that reported the proportion of US adults with hypertension that had controlled BP declined from 2013 to 2014 through 2017 to 2018.8 Contrasting the current results to the previous study, the age-adjusted prevalence of BP control in 2017 to 2020 as reported in the current study was higher than reported for 2017 to 2018 (48.2% versus 43.7%), similar to 2015 to 2016 (48.2% versus 48.4%) and lower than in 2013 to 2014, where the prevalence of BP control was 53.8%.8 Together with the prior NHANES analysis, the current study’s results suggest the prevalence of BP control among US adults with hypertension in 2017 to 2020 may be similar to 2015 to 2016 but remains below the peak level achieved in 2013 to 2014.

A decline in BP control also has occurred in other countries. For example, in Canada, the proportion of adults with hypertension who had controlled BP declined from 69.9% in 2012 to 2013 to 58.3% in 2016 to 2017.32 Additionally, an analysis of 123 national Health Examination Surveys found a plateau or decline in BP control occurred from 2005 to 2019 in the majority of 12 high-income countries studied.30 Along with the results of the current study, these data emphasize the need for global programs to improve BP control.

NHANES was stopped in March 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.10 Studies have found that BP may have increased and BP control among US adults with hypertension may have decreased during the pandemic.33,34 Early in the pandemic, concerns were raised about the renin-angiotensin system inhibitors being associated with more severe COVID-19.35 While these concerns were determined to be unfounded, this may have led some people to discontinue their antihypertensive medication early in the pandemic.36,37 In addition, there were 50% fewer office-based visits in April through June 2020 compared with the same period in 2018 and 2019, which was accompanied by a 50% decrease in BP level assessment.38 While telemedicine visits increased over this period, BP was assessed in <10% of those visits. This could reduce opportunities for intensifying antihypertensive medication for patients with uncontrolled BP.39 Although a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BP control has been documented, innovation in health care delivery including remote visits, better technology, and increased use of home BP monitoring has the potential to improve care for patients with hypertension.40,41

In October 2020, the US Surgeon General released a Call-to-Action to Control Hypertension.42 The Call-to-Action provides goals and strategies to improve BP control rates, and recommends focus areas to promote health equity with respect to BP control, particularly in resource-limited settings. Three goals were outlined in the Call-to-Action: (1) making hypertension a national priority; (2) ensuring the places where people live, learn, work, and play support hypertension control; and (3) optimizing patient care for hypertension control. The Call-to-Action recognized the disparities in hypertension prevalence and BP control among different segments of the US population and emphasized the need to address health inequities and disparities so that all members of society can achieve their full health potential. In addition to these approaches, the use of single-pill combination antihypertensive medication, long-acting medications, and longer prescriptions have been shown to be effective in increasing BP control.5 The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the AHA have also indicated a commitment to increasing health equity, including reducing disparities in BP and BP-related outcomes.43,44 Data from the current study suggest these goals are increasing in importance.

This study has several limitations. BP was measured during a single NHANES visit. Some participants with uncontrolled BP based on measurements from that visit may have had controlled BP if multiple visits had been conducted as recommended by guidelines. Out-of-office BP measurement, including ambulatory BP monitoring or home BP monitoring, is recommended for confirming the diagnosis of hypertension and monitoring BP control but was not performed in NHANES.5 Some participants may have had white coat hypertension or masked hypertension. Among individuals who were approached to participate in NHANES, the proportion that agreed declined between 2009 to 2010 and 2019 to 2020.45 Although survey weights were used to produce estimates for the US population, the impact of the declining participation rate on the study results is unclear.

Perspectives

In conclusion, the proportion of US adults with hypertension who had controlled BP declined during the decade before the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, substantial disparities exist with declines in BP control occurring among older adults, women, and non-Hispanic Black adults. These data emphasize the need for the implementation of evidence-based and cost-effective approaches to increase BP control among US adults.

Article Information

Acknowledgments

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Medical Association.

Sources of Funding

None.

Disclosures

None.

Supplementary Material

hyp-79-1971-s001.pdf (877.7KB, pdf)

Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms

ACC
American College of Cardiology
AHA
American Heart Association
BP
blood pressure
DBP
diastolic blood pressure
NHANES
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
SBP
systolic blood pressure

For Sources of Funding and Disclosures, see page 1978.

References

  • 1.Pencina MJ, Navar AM, Wojdyla D, Sanchez RJ, Khan I, Elassal J, D’Agostino RB, Sr, Peterson ED, Sniderman AD. Quantifying importance of major risk factors for coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2019;139:1603–1611. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031855 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clark D, 3rd, Colantonio LD, Min YI, Hall ME, Zhao H, Mentz RJ, Shimbo D, Ogedegbe G, Howard G, Levitan EB, et al. Population-attributable risk for cardiovascular disease associated with hypertension in Black adults. JAMA Cardiol. 2019;4:1194–1202. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bundy JD, Li C, Stuchlik P, Bu X, Kelly TN, Mills KT, He H, Chen J, Whelton PK, He J. Systolic blood pressure reduction and risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2017;2:775–781. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration. Pharmacological blood pressure lowering for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease across different levels of blood pressure: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis. Lancet. 2021;397:1625–1636. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00590-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Jr, Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:e127–e248. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kotchen TA. Developing hypertension guidelines: an evolving process. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27:765–772. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpt298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moser M. Evolution of the treatment of hypertension from the 1940s to JNC V. Am J Hypertens. 1997;10:2S–8S. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00016-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muntner P, Hardy ST, Fine LJ, Jaeger BC, Wozniak G, Levitan EB, Colantonio LD. Trends in blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018. JAMA. 2020;324:1190–1200. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.14545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burt VL, Cutler JA, Higgins M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D, Whelton P, Brown C, Roccella EJ. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the adult US population. Data from the Health Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. Hypertension. 1995;26:60–69. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.26.1.60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stierman B, Afful J, Carroll MD, Chen T, Davy O, Fink S, Fryar CD, Gu Q, Hales CM, Hughes JP, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017–March 2020 prepandemic data files—development of files and prevalence estimates for selected health outcomes. In: National Center for Health Statistics, ed. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). NHANES Survey Methods and Analytic Guidelines. Accessed January 23, 2022. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/analyticguidelines.aspx.
  • 12.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed January 23, 2022. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/default.aspx.
  • 13.National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Physician Examination Procedures Manual. 2018. Accessed January 23, 2022. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/2017-2018/manuals/2018-Physician-Examination-Manual-508.pdf
  • 14.Ostchega Y, Nwankwo T, Sorlie PD, Wolz M, Zipf G. Assessing the validity of the Omron HEM-907XL oscillometric blood pressure measurement device in a national survey environment. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010;12:22–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2009.00199.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ostchega Y, Nwankwo T, Chiappa M, Wolz M, Graber J, Nguyen DT. Comparing blood pressure values obtained by two different protocols: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017-2018. Vital Health Stat 1. 2021(87):1–26. doi: 10.15620/cdc:104185 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Burt VL, Whelton P, Roccella EJ, Brown C, Cutler JA, Higgins M, Horan MJ, Labarthe D. Prevalence of hypertension in the US adult population. results from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991. Hypertension. 1995;25:305–313. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.25.3.305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yoon SS, Gu Q, Nwankwo T, Wright JD, Hong Y, Burt V. Trends in blood pressure among adults with hypertension: United States, 2003 to 2012. Hypertension. 2015;65:54–61. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.04012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr, Jones DW, Materson BJ, Oparil S, Wright JT, Jr, Roccella EJ; Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000107251.49515.c2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Howard G, Cushman M, Kissela BM, Kleindorfer DO, McClure LA, Safford MM, Rhodes JD, Soliman EZ, Moy CS, Judd SE, Howard VJ; Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Investigators. Traditional risk factors as the underlying cause of racial disparities in stroke: lessons from the half-full (empty?) glass. Stroke. 2011;42:3369–3375. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.625277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bibbins-Domingo K, Pletcher MJ, Lin F, Vittinghoff E, Gardin JM, Arynchyn A, Lewis CE, Williams OD, Hulley SB. Racial differences in incident heart failure among young adults. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1179–1190. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bahrami H, Kronmal R, Bluemke DA, Olson J, Shea S, Liu K, Burke GL, Lima JA. Differences in the incidence of congestive heart failure by ethnicity: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2138–2145. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Madsen TE, Howard G, Kleindorfer DO, Furie KL, Oparil S, Manson JE, Liu S, Howard VJ. Sex differences in hypertension and stroke risk in the regards study: a longitudinal cohort study. Hypertension. 2019;74:749–755. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Peters SAE, Carcel C, Millett ERC, Woodward M. Sex differences in the association between major risk factors and the risk of stroke in the UK Biobank cohort study. Neurology. 2020;95:e2715–e2726. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Kannel WB, Ho KK. The progression from hypertension to congestive heart failure. JAMA. 1996;275:1557–1562. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Turnbull F, Woodward M, Neal B, Barzi F, Ninomiya T, Chalmers J, Perkovic V, Li N, MacMahon S; Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Do men and women respond differently to blood pressure-lowering treatment? Results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2669–2680. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration, Turnbull F, Neal B, Ninomiya T, Algert C, Arima H, Barzi F, Bulpitt C, Chalmers J, Fagard R, et al. Effects of different regimens to lower blood pressure on major cardiovascular events in older and younger adults: meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2008;336:1121–1123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39548.738368.BE [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Park IU, Taylor AL. Race and ethnicity in trials of antihypertensive therapy to prevent cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:444–452. doi: 10.1370/afm.708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.James PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, Lackland DT, LeFevre ML, MacKenzie TD, Ogedegbe O, et al. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014;311:507–520. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Leung AA, Bell A, Tsuyuki RT, Campbell NRC. Refocusing on hypertension control in Canada. CMAJ. 2021;193:E854–E855. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.210140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Collaboration. Long-term and recent trends in hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in 12 high-income countries: an analysis of 123 nationally representative surveys. Lancet. 2019;394:639–651. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31145-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wright JT, Jr, Fine LJ, Lackland DT, Ogedegbe G, Dennison Himmelfarb CR. Evidence supporting a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 150 mm Hg in patients aged 60 years or older: the minority view. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:499–503. doi: 10.7326/M13-2981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Leung AA, Williams JVA, McAlister FA, Campbell NRC, Padwal RS; Hypertension Canada’s Research and Evaluation Committee. Worsening hypertension awareness, treatment, and control rates in Canadian women between 2007 and 2017. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36:732–739. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.02.092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Laffin LJ, Kaufman HW, Chen Z, Niles JK, Arellano AR, Bare LA, Hazen SL. Rise in blood pressure observed among US adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Circulation. 2022;145:235–237. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chamberlain AM, Cooper-dehoff RM, Fontil V, Nilles EK, Shaw K, Smith M, Maeztu C, Todd J, Carton T, O’Brien EC, et al. Disruption in blood pressure control with the COVID-19 pandemic: a study of 24 US health systems in the PCORnet blood pressure control laboratory. Circulation. 2021;144:e564–e593.34928705 [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Liabeuf S, Moragny J, Bennis Y, Batteux B, Brochot E, Schmit JL, Lanoix JP, Andrejak C, Ganry O, Slama M, et al. Association between renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and COVID-19 complications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021;7:426–434. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Reynolds HR, Adhikari S, Pulgarin C, Troxel AB, Iturrate E, Johnson SB, Hausvater A, Newman JD, Berger JS, Bangalore S, et al. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of COVID-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2441–2448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Semenzato L, Botton J, Drouin J, Baricault B, Vabre C, Cuenot F, Penso L, Herlemont P, Sbidian E, Weill A, et al. Antihypertensive drugs and COVID-19 risk: a cohort study of 2 million hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2021;77:833–842. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Alexander GC, Tajanlangit M, Heyward J, Mansour O, Qato DM, Stafford RS. Use and content of primary care office-based vs telemedicine care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e2021476. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21476 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Czeisler MÉ, Marynak K, Clarke KEN, Salah Z, Shakya I, Thierry JM, Ali N, McMillan H, Wiley JF, Weaver MD, et al. Delay or avoidance of medical care because of COVID-19-related concerns - United States, June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:1250–1257. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6936a4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Palanica A, Fossat Y. COVID-19 has inspired global healthcare innovation. Can J Public Health. 2020;111:645–648. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00406-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Coffey JD, Christopherson LA, Glasgow AE, Pearson KK, Brown JK, Gathje SR, Sangaralingham LR, Carmona Porquera EM, Virk A, Orenstein R, et al. Implementation of a multisite, interdisciplinary remote patient monitoring program for ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19. NPJ Digit Med. 2021;4:123. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00490-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.US Department of Health & Human Services. Surgeon General’s Call to Action to Control Hypertension. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General. 2020. https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/reports-and-publications/index.html
  • 43.Mensah GA, Stoney CM, Freemer MM, Smith S, Engelgau MM, Hoots WK, Kiley JP, Goff DC. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute strategic vision implementation for health equity research. Ethn Dis. 2019;29(suppl 1):57–64. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Harrington RA, Califf RM, Balamurugan A, Brown N, Benjamin RM, Braund WE, Hipp J, Konig M, Sanchez E, Joynt Maddox KE. Call to action: rural health: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association. Circulation. 2020;141:e615–e644. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000753 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.O’Brien E. First Thomas Pickering Memorial Lecture*: ambulatory blood pressure measurement is essential for the management of hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14:836–847. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00698.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

hyp-79-1971-s001.pdf (877.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES