Abstract
Medicinal plants are the product of natural drug discoveries and have gained traction due to their pharmacological activities. Pathogens are everywhere, and they thrive in ideal conditions depending on the nutrients, moisture, temperature, and pH that increase the growth of harmful pathogens on surfaces and textiles. Thus, antimicrobial agents and finishes may be the solution to the destruction of pathogens. This review article presents an analysis of various aspects of producing antimicrobial finishings, the microorganisms, their mechanism of attachment to natural and synthetic fibre, the effect of microbial growth, and the principle and mechanism of the microbial activity of the medicinal plants. Furthermore, the extraction methods, qualitative and quantitative phytochemical evaluations of antimicrobial efficacy, and developments of antimicrobial treated textiles using various agents are covered in this review.
Keywords: antimicrobial agents, textile finishings, extractions, solvents, phytochemical screening, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis
1. Introduction
Antibiotics play a vital role in fighting bacterial infections, but antibacterial resistance has caused havoc in the healthcare and pharmaceutical sector that accelerates socio-economic losses [1]. Multidrug Resistance is said to increase by 10 million deaths per year by 2050 [1,2]. Biological screening, separation of the phytochemicals, and clinical trials of the medicinal plants have advanced over the years unfolding the secrets of ancient herbal remedies [3]. Traditional medicine is effective in dealing with diseases caused by bacteria or oxidative stress [4,5,6].
Natural compounds have been extensively explored for new drug discoveries [7] Humanity has always been fascinated by natural compounds from pre-biotic, microbial, plant, and animal sources. Extracts of different parts of plants contain bioactive compounds that fight against diseases such as alkaloids, steroids, tannins, glycosides, volatile oils, fixed oils, resins, phenols, terpenoids, and flavonoids [8] The phenolic phytochemicals from plants play a key role as antimicrobial agents [6,9] Antimicrobial agents decay the protein components of the cell wall, disrupting the work of enzymes and DNA and RNA replication [10] Table 1 shows a selection of plants, their phytochemicals responsible for antimicrobial activity, and their applications.
Table 1.
Plant Name | Phytochemicals | Applications |
---|---|---|
Sutherlandia fructecens | Saponins, pinitols, flavonoids, triterpenoids, Cannavanine, cycloartane glycosides, flavonol glycosides, and aminobutyric acid [11]. | Wound treatment, cancer treatment, diabetes, skin diseases, rheumatism, urinary tract infection, fever, gonorrhoea, kidney, and liver problems [11]. |
Eucomis autumnalis | Homoisoflavanones, terpenoids, and diben-α-pyrones [12]. | Reducing fever, urinary diseases, stomach, lower backaches, and syphilis. Eucomisautumnalis issometimes used to induce labour [12]. |
Plumbago auriculata | Tannins, phenols, alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, plumbagin, α-amyrin, capensisone, and diomuscinone [13]. | Treating headaches, warts, skin infections, wounds, and fractures [13]. |
Catharanthus roseus | Vinblastine, deoxyvinblastin, vincoline, cathanranthamine, rosicine, leurosine, vindoline and vincristine [14]. | Treating rheumatism, venereal diseases, skin infections, high blood pressure, and diabetes [15]. |
Aspalathus linearis | Spalathin, orientin, isoquercitrin, and luteolinhyperoside [15]. | Treat insomnia, stomach cramps, allergies, and digestive problems as well as improve appetite [16]. |
Centella asiatica | Triterpenoids, centellose, medacassoside, triaponosides, flavonoid quercetin, rutin, kaempferol, patuletin, apigenin, polyacetylenes, phenolic acids, sterols [17]. | Treating fever, leprosy, syphilis, tuberculosis, leprosy, asthma, epilepsy, mental disorder, and minor wounds. Consumed as a vegetable and used as a spice [17]. |
Sclerocarya birrea | Glucosides, steroids, glycosides, flavonoids, fatty oils, alkaloids, phenols, resins, calcium, and phosphorus [18]. | Treating dysentery, rheumatism, malaria, and diarrhoea [18]. |
Hypoxis hemerocallidea | Rooperol, β-sitosterol [19]. | Immune booster, purgative, and laxative tonic. Treat tuberculosis, urinary tract infection, infertility, cancer, diabetes, and wounds [19]. |
Galenia africana | Trihydroxyflavanone, trihydroxychalcone, dihydroxychalcone, trihydroxy-3-methoxychalcone [20]. | Treat venereal sores, eye infections, asthma, tuberculosis, cough, wounds, skin infections and relieve toothache [20]. |
2. Textiles and Microorganisms
Textiles are carriers of microorganisms and are subjected to the growth of microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, depending on the food, acidic pH, temperature, time, oxygen, and moisture [11]. Bacteria interrelates with fibres in phases, from initial attachment onto fibres to the growth and damage to the fibres [12]. Cotton is one of the ideal natural fibre fabrics for the growth of pathogens than polyester. Neely [21]. has shown the survival of several gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis) on standard hospital fabrics made of 100% cotton clothing, 100% cotton terry towels, 60%/40% cotton/polyester-scrub suits and lab coats, and 100% polyester drape.
A study by Neely [21] showed the growth of bacteria within 48 h, most bacterial growth survived at least a day, and some survived more than 90 days. Natural fibre textiles are more prone to microbial growth and could lead to the spread of infections [14]. A study by Gupta [22] reports that the attachment of the bacteria onto the fabric is dependent on the characteristics of the fabric, the contact time of the microbe onto the fabric, surface roughness, and moisture retention for natural and synthetic fibres reacting differently to microbial growth [2]. Natural fibres are more prone to microbial attack because they retain water easily. Microbial growth on synthetic fibres like polyester is slower due to their polymer backbone [12].
3. Requirements, Modes of Antimicrobial Action of Antimicrobial Agents
The ideal antimicrobial treatment for textiles must be effective against a broad spectrum of pathogens but exhibit low toxicity to the user. It must be cost-effective, durable to launder, and not alter the quality or appearance of the textile [23].
A study by Gao et al., [24] reported that microbes are microscopic organisms that exist as unicellular, multicellular, or cell clusters. They consist of an outermost cell wall that constitutes polysaccharides. The cell wall maintains the integrity of cellular components and shields the cell from the extracellular environment. Beneath the cell wall is a semi-permeable membrane that encloses intracellular organelles and multiple enzymes and nucleic acids. The enzymes are responsible for the chemical reactions within the cell, followed by the storage of nucleic acid genetic information of the organism. The purpose of antimicrobial agents is to destroy the cell wall or alter cell membrane permeability, denature proteins, inhibit enzyme activity, or inhibit lipid synthesis so that the cell does not survive.
The modes of antimicrobial action of antimicrobial agents define the existence of antimicrobial agents. The antimicrobial agents target mainly the cell wall, and cell membrane, denature protein, inhibit enzyme activity, and inhibit lipid synthesis. There are various classes of antimicrobial agents that possess different mechanisms of action against microbes. Table 2 shows the different antimicrobial classes, the mechanisms of action, and the activity spectrum, respectively [25]. Adapted with permission from Ref. [25]. 2014, Dr Patricia Tille.
Table 2.
Antimicrobial Class | Mechanism of Action | Activity Spectrum |
---|---|---|
β-lactams | They inhibit cell wall synthesis by binding enzymes in peptidoglycan production | Gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria could differ with individual antibiotic |
Aminoglycosides | Hinders the protein synthesis by binding 30S ribosomal subunits | Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria |
Chloramphenicol | Inhibits the protein synthesis by binding 50S ribosomal subunits | Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria |
Fluoroquinolones | Inhibits DNA synthesis by binding the DNA gyrase topoisomerase IV | Gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria, but it could differ with individual antibiotic |
Glycylglycines | Inhibits the protein synthesis by binding 50S ribosomal units | A wide spectrum of gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive species |
Ketolides | Inhibits protein synthesis by binding 50S ribosomal subunits | Gram-positive cocci including certain macrolide resistance strains and Gram-negative strains |
Lipopeptides | Binding and disruption of cell membrane | Gram-positive bacteria including β-lactams and glycopeptides |
Nitrofurantoin | The mechanism is unknown and may have bacterial enzyme targets and damaging DNA | Gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria |
Oxazolidinones | Hinders the initiation of protein synthesis by binding 50S ribosomal subunits | Wide variety of Gram-positive bacteria including those resistant antimicrobial classes |
Polymyxins | Disrupts cell membrane c | Poor activity against most Gram-positive bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria |
Rifampin | Hinders RNA synthesis by binding DNA dependent, RNA polymerase | Gram-positive and certain Gram-negative bacteria |
Streptogramins | Hinders the protein synthesis by binding two separate sites on the 50S ribosomal subunit | Gram-positive bacteria |
Tetracycline | Inhibits protein synthesis by binding of 30S ribosomal subunit | Gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria and several intracellular bacterial pathogens |
Sulfonamides | Hinders the folic acid pathway, binding the enzyme dihydropteroate synthase | Gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria |
Trimethoprim | Hinders with the folic acid pathway by binding the enzyme dihydrofolate reductase | Gram-negative bacteria and gram-positive bacteria |
Textiles are regarded as the only barrier between humans and pathogens. Plant-based extracts and materials provide an efficient and natural microbial resistivity. Antimicrobial textiles are essential in the apparel, commercial, and healthcare sector [26]. A study by Vastrad et al. [27] reported on the evaluation of total phenolic content and flavonoid content using leaf extracts (eucalyptus and lemongrass) with methanol, ethanol, chloroform, and distilled water extract indicated the potential of antimicrobial application of textiles. The antimicrobial agents and finishing on textiles may allow the re-use of face masks, and clothing, reducing PPE kits in health care, reducing domestic laundering that may lead to a reduction in water consumption, curtailing the worldwide pandemic, global warming, and environmental degradation.
4. Pre-Treatment and Processing of Biomass
4.1. Drying of Biomass
The selection of pre-treatment and processing methods may influence the reduction in extraction time, an increase in extraction yield, quality of the biological compounds, and reduction in input energy [28]. The drying of any biomass inhibits microbial growth [18], and it aids in the longer shelf life and transportation costs due to the weight and space of dry products [29,30,31]. Drying can affect the phytochemical components of the thermally sensitive components [29,32,33,34], and the process can also contribute to improved conservation of the bioactive compounds against oxidative [35] and enzymatic activities [36] and spoilage bacteria [30,37,38], enabling cellular destruction [28,30,35]. There are many different drying methods, e.g., thermal through natural convection (shade and open sun drying), forced convection (oven drying, solar drying, and heat pump drying), freeze-drying, greenhouse drying, microwave drying, and infrared drying [28].
The freeze-drying method retains the bioactive compounds of the dried product due to minimal thermal damage to the cell tissue, thermolabile compounds, and its porous surface, enabling increased penetration of solvents [30,35,39] Olive leave extracts pre-treated with a hot air drier at 120 °C showed higher phenolic recovery compared to freeze-drying (loss of polyphenols reached up to 39% in dry weight). Freeze-drying shows great potential in the extraction of the total phenolic content [35,40].
Ahmad-Qasem [35] reported that temperature plays a key role in the drying process as it may be beneficial or unfavourable to the microstructure of the biomass and the use of hot air drying at a high temperature. The study by Ahmad-Qasem [35] also reported better extraction efficacy of some phenolic compounds in olive leaves when compared to samples dried at lower temperatures and by drying at a moderate to low temperature may need a longer drying time to reach the desired moisture content of the biomass.
4.2. Choice of Solvents
The solvent selection is crucial in determining the bioactive compounds of plants used for extractions. Ideal extraction solvent properties include low toxicity, evaporating easily at low temperatures, having good solubility of the target compound, and being sufficiently volatile. The factors affecting the selection of solvents are the rate of extraction, diversity of compounds extracted, ease of handling of extracts, and the cost-effectiveness of the extraction solvents and targeted compounds. Plants consist of various bioactive compounds with varying polarities. Various techniques have been developed and used to obtain pure compounds determining the structure and biological activity [41]. Many solvent extractions have been done to obtain phytochemical compounds for their activity against pathogens. Different phytochemicals have different structural features and consist of different phytochemical compounds as well as action mechanisms as described below:
Phenols and polyphenols are obtained from acetone and ethanol solvent extractions which consist of C3 sidechain, hydroxyl groups and a phenol ring e.g., catechol, epicatechin, cinnamic acid that has antimicrobial, anthelmintic, and antidiarrheal activity. The mechanism of action of polyphenols binds to proteins (adhesins), inhibits enzyme-substrate deprivation, complexes with the cell wall, makes intestinal mucosa more resistant and reduces secretion, increases the supply of digestible proteins by animals by forming protein complexes in the rumen, and causes a decrease in gastrointestinal-tract metabolism [42,43].
Chloroform, methanol, and ethanol solvents extract mainly quinones. They consist of aromatic rings, two ketone substitutions e.g., hypericin that has antimicrobial activity. The mechanisms of action of quinones inactivate enzymes, complex with the cell wall, and bind to proteins (adhesins) [42,43].
Ethanol and water mainly extract tannins which consist of polymeric phenols e.g., ellagitannin which has antimicrobial anthelmintic and antidiarrheal activities. The mechanism of action of tannins allows the binding of proteins (adhesins), inhibits enzyme-substrate deprivation, complexes with the cell wall, makes intestinal mucosa more resistant and reduces secretion, increases the supply of digestible proteins by animals by forming protein complexes in the rumen, and causes a decrease in gastrointestinal-tract metabolism [42,43].
Chloroform solvents extract mainly flavonoids which consist of phenolic structure, a carbonyl group, hydroxylated phenols C3 –C5 unit linked to an aromatic ring, flavones and a +3-hydroxyl group that has antimicrobial, anthelmintic and antidiarrheal activity. The mechanism of action of flavonoids is complex with the cell wall, binds to proteins (adhesins), inhibits the secretion of autocoids and prostaglandins and inhibits contractions caused by spasms [42,43].
Ether solvent extracts mainly coumarins and it consists of phenols made up of fused benzenes e.g., warfarin with antimicrobial activity. The mechanism of action of coumarins allows the interaction with eukaryotic DNA [42,43].
Water, ethanol, chloroform, and ether solvents extract mainly terpenoids which consist of fatty acids and acetate units with antimicrobial activity. The mechanism of action of terpenoids inhibits the release of autocoids and prostaglandins [42,43].
Lectins and polypeptides can be extracted by water which consists of mainly extracts proteins e.g., mannose-specific agglutinin, and fabatin that has antimicrobial activity. The mechanism of action of lectins and polypeptides blocks viral fusion or adsorption. [42,43].
Alkaloids can be extracted by ethanol and ether solvents which consist of heterocyclic nitrogen compounds e.g., berberine, piperine, palmatine and tetrahydropalmatine which has antimicrobial, anthelmintic and antidiarrheal activity. The mechanism of action of alkaloids inhibits the secretion of autocoids and prostaglandins and possesses anti-oxidating effects, thus reducing nitrate generation, which is useful for protein synthesis and suppresses the transfer of sucrose from the stomach to the small intestine. [42,43].
Glycosides are mainly obtained when extracted by ethanol solvent, which consists of sugar plus a non-carbohydrate moiety e.g., amygdalin which has antidiarrheal activity. The mechanisms of action of glycosides inhibit the secretion of autocoids and prostaglandins [42,43].
Saponins can be extracted by methanol, water, and hydro-alcoholic 70 % methanol which consists of amphipathic glycosides e.g., vina-ginsenosides R5-R6 with antidiarrheal activity. The mechanism of action of saponins inhibits histamine release in-vitro [42,43]. The selection, identification, and collection of plants are critical for phytochemical studies. It is crucial to have the plants identified by a plant specialist. Many plants are selected through either traditional means by humans or by investigations based on reports of their biological properties. During extraction, solvents diffuse in the plant material and dissolve compounds with similar polarity. The plant’s bioactive chemicals depend on the plant material origin, conditions of the plant it has grown or cultivated in, moisture content, and particle size of the plant parts. The different extraction methods will also affect the composition of the secondary metabolites of the extracts namely, type of extraction, time of extraction, temperature and nature of the solvent, solvent concentration, and polarity.
The determination of biologically active compounds from plant materials is crucial and dependent on the type of solvent used [44]. Solvents are selected based on their availability, low toxicity, boiling point, ease of evaporation, and solvent polarity [45,46]. The FAO/WHO Expert Committee reported seventeen solvents that are allowed and regarded as safe to use for food and personal-care products.
5. Microorganisms
Resistance to antibiotics has become a serious problem globally. ESKAPE are multidrug-resistant pathogens such as Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species who are responsible for Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAI). New antibiotics have been produced over the years. The resistance by the ESKAPE pathogens to the drugs has accelerated tremendously [47]. A Priority Pathogen List (PPL) was released by the WHO in 2016 as a guide to research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics globally [48]. Pathogens occupy the surfaces of fabrics depending on the contact time, moisture retention, and surface roughness. Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli pathogens cause hospital infections leading to pneumonia and sepsis. It is, therefore, important to keep track of the availability of alternative medicinal plants and herbs to conquer this challenge [49]. The discovery of new drugs that can be mastered with the use of plant extracts is a hoard of a spectrum of secondary metabolites [50,51,52,53,54,55,56].
5.1. Enterococcus faecium
Enterococcus faecium is a Gram-positive bacterium that causes infections; it is increasingly resistant compared to Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci faecium [57,58]. E. faecium lives in the gut microbiome of animals [59,60]. Food is an excellent hideout for the strains to remain dormant [61]. Treatment is dependent on second-line antibiotics [62]. Urinary tract infections, bacteraemia, and endocarditis are caused by this bacterium [60].
5.2. Staphylococcus aureus
Staphylococcus aureus is a Gram-positive bacterium prevalent on the human skin, particularly in immune-compromised individuals. This bacterium causes infections on medical implants and forms biofilms that make it extremely difficult to treat with antibiotics. The Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus developed resistance against β-lactam antibiotics [58]. Community Associated-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineages are associated with skin and soft tissue infections. The Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus strains are associated with pneumonia and bloodstream infections [63].
5.3. Klebsiella pneumonaie
Klebsiella pneumonaie is a Gram-negative bacterium that causes urinary tract infections septicaemia, surgical wound infections, pneumonia, endocarditis, pyogenic liver abscess cystitis, and endogenous endophthalmitis [64]. The Cephalosporin- and carbapenem-class antibiotics have been the base treatment for Enterobacterales infections, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae. The efficacy of the antibiotics is compromised by the widespread acquisition of genes and encoding enzymes that aid in the respective resistance to these critical drugs [65].
5.4. Acinetobacter baumannii
Acinetobacter baumannii is a Gram-negative bacterium that is more common in hospital settings [66]. It is aerobic and non-fermenting pleomorphic. This bacterium can resist dehydration. It forms biofilms, surface adhesins, and secretions systems that help this bacterium thrive in its environment [67]. The infection rates of A. baumannii are low compared to the ESKAPE pathogens [68].
5.5. Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium associated with respiratory infections and displays resistance to multiple classes of antibiotics [68]. P. aeruginosa grows and colonizes in moist environments, especially in healthcare settings in the context of chronic wounds, respiratory support, or urinary tract devices, immune evasion, and antimicrobial resistance [69].
5.6. Enterobacter spp.
It’s a Gram-negative bacterium, anaerobic in nature. Enterobacter aerogenes, known as Klebsiella aerogenes are responsible for the increasing hospital-acquired infections [69]. Immunocompromised individuals are more susceptible to urinary and respiratory tract infections to this bacterium [70].
5.7. Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli which is not part of the ESKAPE pathogens is the major cause of bloodstream and urinary tract infection (UTI) in both community and health care settings globally. Sepsis is one of the most common manifestations of E. coli urinary tract infection. E. coli is the most common Gram-negative bacterial species isolated from blood and urine cultures [71].
5.8. Brief Description of the Biocide Agents on the Market
Many biocide agents already exist on the market. They are classified into the following compounds [72]:
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds: These compounds represent a group of compounds. They consist of a subgroup of alkyl linear ammonium compounds, composed of hydrophobic alkyl chain and hydrophilic-counterpart. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds damage cell membranes, modify proteins and inhibits DNA production. They are applied in cotton, polyester, nylon and wool fibres. These compounds are active against a wide range of pathogens but lack physical bonding in textiles.
Triclosan: These compounds are odourless chlorinated bisphenol and improve the durability of laundering. They are active against a wide range of pathogens. They block lipid biosynthesis and hinder the integrity of the cell membranes. They are applied to polyester, nylon, cellulose acetate and polypropylene.
Metals and metallic salts: At low concentrations, they are exceptionally active against pathogens. They generate reactive oxygen species, damaging cellular proteins lipids and DNA. Silver, copper, zinc, and cobalt are used has been widely used as antimicrobial agents and applied to cotton, wool, nylon, and polyester.
Chitosan: is a natural hydrophilic copolymer. It’s a linear polysaccharide that is biocompatible, non-toxic, non-carcinogenic, and antimicrobial. They are applied to cotton, wool, polyester and nylon fibres. The low molecular weight results in inhibiting the synthesis of mRNA, preventing protein synthesis, and the high molecular weight causes leakage of intracellular substances or blocks the transport of essential solutes.
Poly (Hexamethylene Biguanide): These agents are polycationic amines biguanide repeat units separated by aliphatic chains. They interact with membrane phospholipids, resulting in disturbance and the fatal leakage of cytoplasmic materials. They are applied to cotton, nylon, and polyester fibres.
N-halamines: They are heterocyclic organic compounds. N-halamines prevent the cell enzymatic and metabolic processes, causing the consequent microorganism destruction. They are applied in cotton, nylon, polyester and wool fibres and are active against a wide range of pathogens.
Many plant-based compounds with a wide range of antimicrobial activity spectrum have been identified and are commercially available. Table 3 shows the wide range of commercially available antimicrobial agents on the market.
Table 3.
Product Name | Company | Description |
---|---|---|
Agion® | Sciessent, Beverly, MA, USA | Silver and zeolite-based additive |
AlphaSan® | Milliken Chemical, Spartanburg, SC, USA | Silver-based additive |
BioGaurd® | AEGI Microbe Shield, Huntersville, NC, USA | Finishing agent based on 3-trimethoxysilylpropyldimethyloctadecylammonium chloride |
Biozac ZS | Zschimmer & Schwarz Mohsdorf GmbH, Burgstadt, Germany | PHMB-based finishing agent |
Cosmocil CQ™ | Lonza, Basel, Germany | Polyaminopropyl biguanide- based additive |
Eosy® | Unitika, Osaka, Japan | Finishing agent based on chitosan |
Irgaurd® 1000 | BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany | Finishing agent based on triclosan |
Irgasan | Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA | Finishing agent based on triclosan |
Microban® | Microban International, Huntersville, NC, USA | Triclosan-based agent |
Reputex™ | Lonza, Basel, Germany | PHMB-based finishing agent |
Sanigard KC | L. N. Chemical Industries, Maharashtra, India | Finishing agent belonging to the QAC group |
Saniguard Nano-ZN | L. N. Chemical Industries, Maharashtra, India | Finishing solution based on aqueous nano-dispersion of zinc oxide |
Sanitised® | SANITIZED AG, Burgdorf, Germany | Finishing agent based on 3-trimethoxysilylpropyldimethyloctadecylammonium chloride |
Silpure® | Thomson Research Associates, Toronto, ON, Canada | Silver particles-based finishing agent |
Silvadur™ | The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, MI, USA | Interpenetrating polymer network with silver ions |
SmartSilver® | Nanohorizon Inc., Philadelphia, PA, USA | Silver nanoparticles-based agent |
Silverion 2400 | Pure Bioscience, Inc., El Cajon, CA, USA | Stabilised silver complex-based agent |
6. Extraction Methods for Studying Phytochemicals
6.1. Introduction
There are various extraction methods, e.g., solvent extraction, distillation method, pressing, and sublimation. Solvent extraction is the most widely used method where the natural products undergo a process where the solvent penetrates through the plant cell wall and the solute dissolves in the solvents the solute followed by collecting the extract. It has been reported that the size of the plant material, properties of the solvent solid to solvent ratio extraction temperature, and extraction time will affect the extraction efficiency [73,74]. The selectivity of the solvents, solubility, cost and safety play a crucial role in solvent extraction. Solvents with the same polarity as the polarity of the solute will result in a greater yield. High temperature affects dispersion and solubility. High temperatures may result in solvents being lost and extracts with impurities and the degradation of thermolabile compounds. The extraction efficiency increases with extraction time. Increasing time will not affect the extraction. The greater the solvent to solid ratio, the greater the extraction yield [75].
Various extraction methods are used to extract the desired bioactive compounds from the plant materials, e.g., solvent extraction, distillation method, pressing, and sublimation. Solvent extraction is the most widely used extraction method when extracting from plant material.
6.1.1. Cold Extraction
In this extraction process, the plant parts are dried in a controlled environment at low temperatures and milled into a powder and weighed. The powder is added to a beaker with solvents and kept at room temperature for thirty minutes. The contents are shaken every twenty-four hours for seven days. The extract is filtered using Whatman filter paper under vacuum and drying at room temperature in a watch glass dish. The weight of the powder is recorded before and after drying [76].
6.1.2. Plant Tissue Homogenization
Fresh plant parts are grounded in a blender. The solvent is added and shaken vigorously for 5–10 min or left for 24 h followed by filtration of the extract. The filtrate can be dried under reduced pressure and redissolved in the solvent to determine the concentration, or it can be centrifuged for clarification for further studies [44].
6.1.3. Serial Exhaustive Extraction
In this extraction method, the solvent of increasing polarity from a non-polar solvent (hexane) to a polar solvent (methanol) is used to ensure a broad polarity range of compounds being extracted and to prepare crude extracts [44].
6.1.4. Soxhlet Extraction
In this extraction method, solid material is placed in a thimble in the extractor. The solvent is heated until reflux. The vapour rises, and the solvent is condensed and fills up the thimble. The extraction is repeated [77,78].
6.1.5. Maceration
A whole or coarsely powdered plant is soaked in the solvent in a container for a period under continuous mixing until agitation until the biomass matter is dissolved [44].
6.1.6. Decoction
In this extraction method, the plant parts are brought to a boil in water followed by cooling, straining, and passing sufficient cold water through the drug to produce the required volume [77].
6.1.7. Infusion
In this extraction method, the plant parts are macerated with either cold or boiling water [77].
6.1.8. Digestion
In this extraction method, the plant parts are macerated under gentle heating [77].
6.1.9. Percolation
In this extraction method, the raw material is placed in an appropriate amount of solvent for approximately 4 h in a closed container. Additional solvent is added to the top of the raw material and macerated in a closed container for 24 h. The percolator is opened, and the extract is poured out drip-wise. Additional solvent is added until the percolate measures about three-quarters of the required volume of the finished product. The marc is pressed, and the pressed liquid is added to the percolate. Additional solvent is added to produce the required volume, and the mixed liquid is clarified by filtration or by decanting [77].
6.1.10. Sonication
This method uses ultrasound technology to assist in the extraction of the bioactive compounds under frequencies ranging from 20 kHz to 2000 kHz. The ultrasound increases the permeability of cell walls and produces cavitation and ruptures the plant cell wall [77].
6.1.11. Enzymatic Extraction
In this extraction method, enzymes are used to increase the yields during the extraction. Enzymes are used to soften the tissues of biomass and facilitate the degradation of the cells [79].
6.1.12. Microwave-Assisted Extraction
This extraction method uses microwave radiation and solvents to extract bioactive compounds. Microwave energy is generated through microwave radiation that heats the solvents whilst increasing the kinetics of the extraction. Moisture occurs in the plant cells when heat is applied and evaporates. The microwave effect generates pressure on the cell wall and results in cell rupture. Exudation occurs and leads to an increase in extraction yield [79].
6.1.13. Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction
This is an extraction method using ultrasonic sound waves that pass through the solvent, producing energy by enhancing the diffusion of the solvent into the sample array. The Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction is cost-effective in terms of the quantity of solvent used, temperature, and time [79].
6.1.14. The Supercritical Fluid Extraction
In this extraction method, supercritical fluids at high temperatures and pressures above the critical values are applied to the extraction material. The pressure is adjusted, and the supercritical fluids return to their gas phase and evaporate without leaving solvent residues [79].
6.1.15. Pressurised Liquid Extraction
This extraction method is conducted under high pressures and temperatures that aid in the high solubility of the compounds in the solvent and result in high diffusion of the solvent into the sample array [79]. Table 4 shows the various extraction methods used when extracting biomass.
Table 4.
Method | Solvent | Temperature | Pressure | Time | Volume Consumed | The Polarity of Natural Products |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maceration | Water, Aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Room temperature | Atmospheric | Long | Large | Dependent on extracting solvent |
Percolation | Water, Aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Room temperature, occasional heat | Atmospheric | Long | Large | Dependent on extracting solvent |
Decoction | Water | Under heat | Atmospheric | Moderate | None | Polar compounds |
Reflux extraction | Aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Under heat | Atmospheric | Moderate | Moderate | Dependent on the extracting solvents |
Soxhlet extraction | Organic solvents | Under heat | Atmospheric | Long | Moderate | Dependent on extracting solvent |
Pressurised liquid extraction | Water, aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Under heat | High | Short | Small | Dependent on extracting solvent |
Supercritical fluid extraction | CO2 | Near room temperatures | High | Short | None or small | Non-polar to moderate compounds |
Ultrasound-assisted extraction | Water, aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Room temperature or under heat | Atmospheric | Short | Moderate | Dependent on extracting solvent |
Microwave-assisted extraction | Water, aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Room temperature | Atmospheric | Short | Moderate | Dependent on extracting solvent |
Pulsed electric field extraction | Water, aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Room temperature or under heat | Atmospheric | Short | Moderate | Dependent on extracting solvent |
Enzyme assisted extraction | Water, aqueous and non-aqueous solvents | Room temperature or heated after enzyme treatment | Atmospheric | Moderate | Moderate | Dependent on extracting solvent |
6.2. Chromatography Techniques
6.2.1. Introduction
Chromatography is a technique used to separate molecules based on their size, shape, and charge. The analyte in the solvent passes through a molecular sieve which leads to its separation. Paper and thin layer chromatography readily provide qualitative information and through which it becomes possible to obtain quantitative data.
6.2.2. Paper Chromatography (PC)
In this technique, a sheet of paper is used to carry out separations which acts as both support as well a medium for separation. The sample is placed near the bottom of the filter paper and the filter paper is placed in the chromatographic chamber with solvent. The solvent moves forward by capillary action carrying soluble molecules along with it. Low porosity paper will produce a slow rate of movement of the solvent and thick papers have increased sample capacity [80].
6.2.3. Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)
This technique is used to separate the samples based on the interaction between a thin layer of adsorbent attached to the plate with low molecular weight compounds. Different adsorbents are used to separate various compounds [80].
6.2.4. Gas Chromatography (GC)
This technique is used to separate volatile compounds. The rate of kinetics for the chemical species is determined through its distribution in the gas phase. Gas chromatography involves a sample being vaporized and injected onto the head of the chromatographic column. The sample is transported through the column by the flow of the inert, gaseous mobile phase. The column itself contains a liquid stationary phase which is adsorbed onto the surface of an inert solid [80].
6.2.5. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
This technique separates compounds based on their interactions with solid particles of a tightly packed column and the solvent of the mobile phase. The Diode Array Detector measures the absorption spectra of the analytes to aid in their identification of the compounds [80].
6.3. Qualitative and Quantitative Phytochemical Screening
6.3.1. Introduction
The study of bioactive compounds encompasses phytochemical and pharmacological approaches [81] Many plant parts contain bioactive components, e.g., bark, leaves, stems, fruits, and seeds [82]. Phytochemicals are chemicals produced by the various parts of the plants namely, alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, steroids, tannins, glycosides, etc. The bioactive compounds have various antimicrobial and antibacterial properties [83]. Qualitative phytochemical screening plays a crucial role in identifying various biochemical compounds produced by plants. The quantification of those metabolites may assist in the extraction, purification, and identification of the bioactive compounds for human use [83]. The preliminary qualitative phytochemical screening is carried out as per standard methods described by Trease & Evans 1989.
Detection of Alkaloids
The extracts are dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid and filtered individually and tested for the presence of alkaloids.
Mayers test: The extraction added to the Mayers reagent. A yellow cream precipitate formation indicates the presence of alkaloids.
Wagner’s test: Wagner’s reagent is added to the extraction if a brown-reddish brown formation is observed, and it indicates the presence of alkaloids.
Detection of Flavonoids
Lead acetate test: A few drops of lead acetate solution is added to the extracts. A yellow-colour precipitate indicates the presence of flavonoids.
Sulfuric acid test: A few drops of sulfuric acid are added to the extracts, and the formation of orange colour indicates the presence of flavonoids.
Detection of Steroids
A few drops of acetic anhydride are added to the extracts and the formation of violet to blue to green in some samples indicates the presence of steroids.
Detection of Terpenoids
Salkowski’s Test: Extract of 5 mg of the selected plant part is mixed with 2 mL chloroform and 3 mL concentrated sulfuric acid added carefully to form a layer. A reddish-brown colour indicates the presence of terpenoids.
Detection of Anthraquinones
Bontrager’s Test: About 5 mg of the extract is boiled with 10% HCl for a few minutes in a water bath. It’s filtered and allowed to cool. An equal volume of CHCl3 is added to the filtrate. A few drops of 10% NH3 are added to the mixture and heated. The formation of pink colour indicates the presence of anthraquinones.
Detection of Phenols
Ferric chloride test: A few drops of ferric chloride are added to the 10 mL extract. A bluish-black colour indicates the presence of phenol.
Lead acetate test: A few drops of lead acetate solution is mixed with 10 mg extract. A yellow colour indicates the presence of phenol.
Detection of Saponins
A 0.5 mg of the extract is mixed vigorously with 5 mL of distilled water. The formation of frothing indicates the presence of saponins.
Detection of Tannins
A few millilitres of the extract are mixed with a few millilitres of water and heated in a water bath. The mixture is filtered. Ferric chloride is added to the filtrate. The dark green colour indicates the presence of tannins.
Detection of Carbohydrates
A 0.5 mg of the extract is dissolved individually in five ml of distilled water and filtered. The filtrate is used to test the presence of carbohydrates [84].
6.3.2. Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis
Estimation of Total Alkaloids
One gram of extract sample is added to a 250 mL beaker, and 200 mL of 10% acetic acid in ethanol is added, covered, and left for settling for 4 h. The extract is filtered and concentrated in a water bath to one-quarter of the original volume. Concentrated ammonium hydroxide is added dropwise to the extract until the precipitation is complete. The solution is allowed to settle, and the precipitate is collected and washed with dilute ammonium hydroxide, followed by filtration. The residue is dried and weighed [85].
Estimation of Total Flavonoids
A gram of sample is extracted repeatedly with 100 mL of 80% aqueous methanol. The mixture is filtered through Whatman no.1 filter paper into a pre-weighed 250 mL beaker. The filtrate is transferred to a water bath and allowed for evaporation to dryness and followed by weighing off the sample [83].
Estimation of Total Phenols
The sample is placed in a beaker and boiled for 15 min with 50 mL of ether for the extraction of phenolic compounds. five mL of the extract is pipetted out into a 50 mL flask followed by the addition of 10 mL of distilled water, 2 mL of ammonium hydroxide solution, and 5 mL of concentrated amyl alcohol. The samples are left to react for 30 min for colour development and read at 505 nm [83].
6.4. Textiles Analysis
6.4.1. Biocidal Analysis
The biocidal analysis evaluates the effectiveness of antimicrobial textiles. Several test methods have been established through quantitative antimicrobial tests. The number of microbes present on the finished fabrics can be counted and expressed as a percentage or as a log reduction. The test methods for quantitative determination are ATCC TM100, JIS L1902, AATCC90 percentage reduction, and ISO 20743 shake flask reduction methods [86].
The Parallel Streak Method (AATCC TM147) is a qualitative method used to determine the antibacterial activity of diffusible antimicrobials agents on treated textile materials. The Parallel Streak Method has proven to be effective. This method shows antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The sterilised agar is dispensed (cooled to 47 °C (117 °F) by pouring 15 mL into each standard (15 × 100 mm) flat bottomed petri dish. Allow agar to gel firmly before inoculating. The inoculum is prepared by transferring 1.0 mL of a 24-h broth culture into 9.0 mL of sterile distilled water containing it in a test tube or small flask. A 4 mm inoculating loop is used, loaded with one loopful of the diluted inoculum and transferred to the surface of the sterile agar plate by making five streaks approximately 60 mm in length, spaced 10 mm apart by covering the central area of a standard petri-dish without refilling the loop. The specimen is pressed onto the agar surface with a sterile spatula. After 18 to 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, the plates are examined for bacterial growth directly underneath the textiles and around the edges of the textiles. If the antimicrobial substance diffuses into the agar, an inhibition area is formed, and its size indicates the effectiveness of the antimicrobial effect or the rate at which the active agent is released [21,24]. AATCC 100 (Suspension Test) is a quantitative antimicrobial test method used to determine the antibacterial activity of the textiles and fabrics against bacteria. The bacterial counts are recorded, and a percent reduction is measured using initial count and remaining count data [24].
6.4.2. Durability Analysis
Durability by washing method (ASTM E3162-18 or AATCC61-2A) is used to determine the durability of laundering. This test method is an accelerated laundering test method to measure the durability of antibacterial agents applied to textiles under simulated home laundering conditions. Ten grams of the coated fabric for laundering is prepared, followed by adding a 500 mL defined detergent solution. Set the washing machine at a temperature of 50 °C under abrasive action using stainless steel balls to simulate five home launderings for a 45-min laundering cycle at 40 revolutions per minute. After each cycle, remove the fabric and rinse with water thoroughly by hand. Repeat, depending on the total number of washes required.
7. Conclusions
Plants are a unique source of bioactive compounds with biological activities and medicinal properties. The choice of solvents plays an important role in the extraction of bioactive chemicals. Antimicrobial agents and textile finishes have gained traction over the years. Synthetic antimicrobial agents show great effectiveness against pathogens but cause harm to the environment and human health. More research on plant-based antimicrobial agents and finishing should be done to extend the longevity of the antimicrobial power and durability to laundering on textiles substrates. The rise of “super germs” has become a global health problem due to antibiotic resistance. More research needs to be done on medicinal plants as a source of alternative medicines using unexplored medicinal plants for their bioactive properties and solvents that are generally regarded as safe. There should be more in-depth studies done on the most economical pre-treatment, drying, and extraction methods for future therapeutics.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the support from the team members and the Cape Peninsula University of Technology University Research Fund Cost centre R971.
Abbreviations
ISO | International Standards Organization |
AATCC | American Association of Textile Chemists and Colourists |
JIS | Japanese Industrial Standards |
PC | Paper Chromatography |
TLC | Thin Layer Chromatography |
GC | Gas Chromatography |
HPLC | High-performance liquid chromatography |
QAC | Quaternary Ammonium Compounds |
mRNA | messenger Ribonucleic acid |
HAI | Health Associated Infections |
PPL | Priority Pathogen List |
WHO | World Health Organization |
RNA | Ribonucleic acid |
DNA | Deoxyribonucleic acid |
UTI | Urinary Tract Infection |
ESKAPE | Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanni, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter aerogenes |
Author Contributions
Writing—original draft preparation, E.N.; Supervision, M.B. Funding acquisition M.B.; Writing review and editing, M.B., E.N., D.M. and P.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.O’Neill J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations. Wellcome Trust; London, UK: 2016. The Review on Antimicrobial Resistance Chaired by Jim O’Neill. [Google Scholar]
- 2.De Kraker M.E.A., Stewardson A.J., Harbarth S., de Kraker M., Stewardson A.J., Harbarth S. Will 10 Million People Die a Year Due to Antimicrobial Resistance by 2050? PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bibi R., Tariq A., Mussarat S., Niaz Khan S., Rahman H., Fathi E., Allah A., Ullah R., Adnan M. Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Antibacterial Activities of Medicinal Flora of Pakistan Used against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa-A Review. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017;30:2285–2300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baydoun S., Chalak L., Dalleh H., Arnold N. Ethnopharmacological Survey of Medicinal Plants Used in Traditional Medicine by the Communities of Mount Hermon, Lebanon. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2015;173 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.06.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singh A., Nautiyal M.C., Kunwar R.M., Bussmann R.W. Ethnomedicinal Plants Used by Local Inhabitants of Jakholi Block, Rudraprayag District, Western Himalaya, India. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedicine. 2017;13 doi: 10.1186/s13002-017-0178-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Restuati M., Diningrat D.S. Antimicrobial Profile of Premna Pubescens. Blume and Centella Asiatica Extracts Against Bacteria and Fungi Pathogens. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2018;14:271–275. doi: 10.3923/ijp.2018.271.275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chandra H., Bishnoi P., Yadav A., Patni B., Mishra A.P., Nautiyal A.R. Antimicrobial Resistance and the Alternative Resources with Special Emphasis on Plant-Based Antimicrobials—A Review. Plants. 2017;6:16. doi: 10.3390/plants6020016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kutama R. Phytochemical Compositions in Some Nigerian Medicinal Plants and Their Pharmacological Properties: A Review. J. Anesthesiol. 2018;6:15–25. doi: 10.11648/j.ja.20180601.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Smeriglio A., Denaro M., Barreca D., Calderaro A., Bisignano C., Ginestra G., Bellocco E., Trombetta D. In Vitro Evaluation of the Antioxidant, Cytoprotective, and Antimicrobial Properties of Essential Oil from Pistacia Vera L. Variety Bronte Hull. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1212. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bakal S.N., Bereswill S., Heimesaat M.M. Finding Novel Antibiotic Substances from Medicinal Plants — Antimicrobial Properties of Nigella Sativa Directed against Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Eur. J. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017;7 doi: 10.1556/1886.2017.00001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dube P., Meyer S., Marnewick J.L. Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Different Solvent Extracts from Fermented and Green Honeybush (Cyclopia Intermedia) Plant Material. South Afr. J. Bot. 2017;110:184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2016.10.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Alaribe F.N., Maepa M.J., Mkhumbeni N., Motaung S.C. Possible Roles of Eucomis Autumnalis in Bone and Cartilage Regeneration: A Review. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2018;17:741. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v17i4.25. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lediga M.E., Malatjie T.S., Olivier D.K., Ndinteh D.T., van Vuuren S.F. Biosynthesis and Characterisation of Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles from a Selection of Fever-Reducing Medicinal Plants of South Africa. South Afr. J. Bot. 2018;119:172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Gajalakshmi S., Jeyanthi P., Vijayalakshmi S., Devi V. Phytochemcial Constituent of Aconitium Species—A Review. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Technol. 2011;2:121–127. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Oguntibeju O.O., Aboua Y., Goboza M. Vindoline—A Natural Product from Catharanthus Roseus Reduces Hyperlipidemia and Renal Pathophysiology in Experimental Type 2 Diabetes. Biomedicines. 2019;7:59. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines7030059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mordeniz C. Traditional and Complementary Medicine. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2019. Introductory Chapter: Traditional and Complementary Medicine. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rout A., Jenna P.K., Patrida U.K., Bindhani B.K. Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Leaves Extract of Centella Asiatica L. for Studies against Human Pathogens. J. Pharma Bio Sci. 2013;4:661–674. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Joubert E., Joubert M.E., Bester C., de Beer D., de Lange J.H. Honeybush (Cyclopia spp.): From Local Cottage Industry to Global Markets—The Catalytic and Supporting Role of Research. South Afr. J. Bot. 2011;77:887–907. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2011.05.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Owira P.M.O., Ojewole J.A.O. ‘African Potato’ (Hypoxis hemerocallidea Corm): A Plant-Medicine for Modern and 21st Century Diseases of Mankind?—A Review. Phytother. Res. 2009;23:147–152. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Elbagory A.M., Meyer M., Cupido C.N., Hussein A.A. Inhibition of Bacteria Associated with Wound Infection by Biocompatible Green Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles from South African Plant Extracts. Nanomaterials. 2017;7:417. doi: 10.3390/nano7120417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Neely A.N., Maley M.P. Survival of Enterococci and Staphylococci on Hospital Fabrics and Plastic Go to: Survival of Enterococci and Staphylococci on Hospital Fabrics and Plastic. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000;38:724–726. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.2.724-726.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gupta D., Bhaumik S. Antimicrobial Treatments for Textiles. Indian J. Fibre Text. Res. 2007;32:254–263. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chauhan P., Kumar A. Development of a Microbial Coating for Cellulosic Surface Using Aloe Vera and Silane. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2020;1:100015. doi: 10.1016/j.carpta.2020.100015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gao Y., Cranston R., Yuan G., Cranston R. Recent Advances in Antimicrobial Treatments of Textiles. Text. Res. J. 2008;78:60–72. doi: 10.1177/0040517507082332. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tille P. Bailey’s and Scotts Diagnostic Microbiology. Elsevier; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2014. Section 3: Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity. Chapter 11: Principles of Antimicrobial Action and Resistance; pp. 153–186. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gulati R., Sharma S., Sharma R.K. Antimicrobial Textile: Recent Developments and Functional Perspective. Polym. Bull. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s00289-021-03826-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vastrad J., Goudar G., Byadgi S. Characterisation of Phenolic Compounds Eucalyptus Globulus and Cymbopogan Citratus Leaf Extracts. BioScan. 2016;11:2153–2156. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Safarzadeh Markhali F. Roles of Drying, Size Reduction, and Blanching in Sustainable Extraction of Phenolics from Olive Leaves. Processes. 2021;9:1662. doi: 10.3390/pr9091662. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pham H., Nguyen V., Vuong Q., Bowyer M., Scarlett C. Effect of Extraction Solvents and Drying Methods on the Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Helicteres Hirsuta Lour. Leaves. Technologies. 2015;3:285–301. doi: 10.3390/technologies3040285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Saifullah M., McCullum R., McCluskey A., Vuong Q. Effects of Different Drying Methods on Extractable Phenolic Compounds and Antioxidant Properties from Lemon Myrtle Dried Leaves. Heliyon. 2019;5:e03044. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shrestha A.K., Ua-arak T., Adhikari B.P., Howes T., Bhandari B.R. Glass Transition Behavior of Spray Dried Orange Juice Powder Measured by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermal Mechanical Compression Test (TMCT) Int. J. Food Prop. 2007;10:661–673. doi: 10.1080/10942910601109218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nóbrega E.M., Oliveira E.L., Genovese M.I., Correia R.T.P. The Impact of Hot Air Drying on the Physical-Chemical Characteristics, Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Acerola (Alphigia emarginata) Residue. J. Food Processing Preserv. 2015;39:131–141. doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nadi F. Bioactive Compound Retention in Echium Amoenum Fisch. & C. A. Mey. Petals: Effect of Fluidized Bed Drying Conditions. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017;20:2249–2260. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2016.1233436. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nguyen V.T., van Vuong Q., Bowyer M.C., van Altena I.A., Scarlett C.J. Effects of Different Drying Methods on Bioactive Compound Yield and Antioxidant Capacity of Phyllanthus amarus. Dry. Technol. 2015;33:1006–1017. doi: 10.1080/07373937.2015.1013197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ahmad-Qasem M.H., Barrajón-Catalán E., Micol V., Mulet A., García-Pérez J.V. Influence of Freezing and Dehydration of Olive Leaves (Var. Serrana) on Extract Composition and Antioxidant Potential. Food Res. Int. 2013;50:189–196. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.10.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Babu A.K., Kumaresan G., Raj V.A.A., Velraj R. Review of Leaf Drying: Mechanism and Influencing Parameters, Drying Methods, Nutrient Preservation, and Mathematical Models. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018;90:536–556. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Afaneh I., Yateem H., Al-Rimawi F. Effect of Olive Leaves Drying on the Content of Oleuropein. Am. J. Anal. Chem. 2015;6:246–252. doi: 10.4236/ajac.2015.63023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Orphanides A., Goulas V., Gekas V. Effect of Drying Method on the Phenolic Content and Antioxidant Capacity of Spearmint. Czech J. Food Sci. 2013;31:509–513. doi: 10.17221/526/2012-CJFS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Harnkarnsujarit N., Kawai K., Watanabe M., Suzuki T. Effects of Freezing on Microstructure and Rehydration Properties of Freeze-Dried Soybean Curd. J. Food Eng. 2016;184:10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.03.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ghelichkhani G., Modaresi M.H., Rashidi L., Shariatifar N., Homapour M., Arabameri M. Effect of the Spray and Freeze Dryers on the Bioactive Compounds of Olive Leaf Aqueous Extract by Chemometrics of HCA and PCA. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2019;13:2751–2763. doi: 10.1007/s11694-019-00196-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sasidharan S., Chen Y., Saravanan D., Sundram K.M., Latha L.Y. Extraction, Isolation and Characterization of Bioactive Compounds from Plants Extracts. Afr. J. Tradit. Complementary Altern. Med. 2011;8:1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cowan M. Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999;12:564–582. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.4.564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tiwari P., Kumar B., Kaur M., Kaur G., Kaur H. Phytochemical Screening and Extraction: A Review. Int. Sci. Pharm. 2011;1:99–106. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Velavan S. Phytochemicals Techniques—A Review. World J. Sci. Res. 2015;1:80–91. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Das K., Shrivastava D., Tiwari R. Techniques for Evaluation of Medicinal Plant Products as Antimicrobial Agents: Current Methods and Future Trends. J. Med. Plants Res. 2010;4:104–111. doi: 10.5897/JMPR09.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kumar D. Herbal Bio-Actives and Food Fortification: Extraction and Formulation. Volume 79. Taylor and Francis; Abingdon, UK: 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 47.FAO/WHO Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives . Summary and Conclusions. FAO; Rome, Italy: WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bhatia P., Sharma A., George A.J., Anvitha D., Kumar P., Dwivedi V.P., Chandra N.S. Antibacterial Activity of Medicinal Plants against ESKAPE: An Update. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06310. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.World Health Organisation . Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research. World Health Organisation; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ghareeb M.A., Refahy L.A., Saad A.M., Osman N.S., Abdel-Aziz M.S., El-Shazly M.A., Mohamed A.S. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of Five Egyptian Plant Species. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2015;5:45–49. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2015.58.S7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ugwoke E., Aisida S.O., Mirbahar A.A., Arshad M., Ahmad I., Zhao T., Ezema F.I. Concentration Induced Properties of Silver Nanoparticles and Their Antibacterial Study. Surf. Interfaces. 2020;18:100419. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2019.100419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cragg G.M., Newman D.J. Natural Products: A Continuing Source of Novel Drug Leads. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 2013;1830:3670–3695. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Madubuonu N., Aisida S.O., Ali A., Ahmad I., Zhao T., Botha S., Maaza M., Ezema F.I. Biosynthesis of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles via a Composite of Psidium guavaja-Moringa oleifera and Their Antibacterial and Photocatalytic Study. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 2019;199:111601. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aisida S.O., Batool A., Khan F.M., Rahman L., Mahmood A., Ahmad I., Zhao T., Maaza M., Ezema F.I. Calcination Induced PEG-Ni-ZnO Nanorod Composite and Its Biomedical Applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020;255:123603. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kandemir F.M., Yıldırım S., Kucukler S., Caglayan C., Darendelioğlu E., Dortbudak M.B. Protective Effects of Morin against Acrylamide-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Nephrotoxicity: A Multi-Biomarker Approach. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020;138:111190. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2020.111190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Ginting B., Maulana I., Karnila I. Biosynthesis Copper Nanoparticles Using Blumea Balsamifera Leaf Extracts: Characterization of Its Antioxidant and Cytotoxicity Activities. Surf. Interfaces. 2020;21:100799. doi: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100799. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Aisida S.O., Ugwu K., Akpa P.A., Nwanya A.C., Ejikeme P.M., Botha S., Ahmad I., Maaza M., Ezema F.I. Biogenic Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Controlled Silver Nanoparticles Using an Extract of Gongronema Latifolium. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019;237:121859. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.121859. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lebreton F., van Schaik W., Manson McGuire A., Godfrey P., Griggs A., Mazumdar V., Corander J., Cheng L., Saif S., Young S., et al. Emergence of Epidemic Multidrug-Resistant Enterococcus Faecium from Animal and Commensal Strains. mBio. 2013;4:e00534-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00534-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pendleton J.N., Gorman S.P., Gilmore B.F. Clinical Relevance of the ESKAPE Pathogens. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2013;11:297–308. doi: 10.1586/eri.13.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Marques C., Belas A., Franco A., Aboim C., Gama L.T., Pomba C. Increase in Antimicrobial Resistance and Emergence of Major International High-Risk Clonal Lineages in Dogs and Cats with Urinary Tract Infection: 16 Year Retrospective Study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:377–384. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Fiore E., van Tyne D., Gilmore M.S. Pathogenicity of Enterococci. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019;7:4. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0053-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ubeda C., Taur Y., Jenq R.R., Equinda M.J., Son T., Samstein M., Viale A., Socci N.D., van den Brink M.R.M., Kamboj M., et al. Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Domination of Intestinal Microbiota Is Enabled by Antibiotic Treatment in Mice and Precedes Bloodstream Invasion in Humans. J. Clin. Investig. 2010;120:4332–4341. doi: 10.1172/JCI43918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Prasad P., Sun J., Danner R.L., Natanson C. Excess Deaths Associated With Tigecycline After Approval Based on Noninferiority Trials. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012;54:1699–1709. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.DeLeo F.R., Otto M., Kreiswirth B.N., Chambers H.F. Community-Associated Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2010;375:1557–1568. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61999-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Navon-Venezia S., Kondratyeva K., Carattoli A. Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Major Worldwide Source and Shuttle for Antibiotic Resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017;41 doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Paterson D.L., Bonomo R.A. Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases: A Clinical Update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005;18:1557–1568. doi: 10.1128/CMR.18.4.657-686.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Munoz-Price L.S., Weinstein R.A. Acinetobacter Infection. New Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:1271–1281. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra070741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Magill S.S., Edwards J.R., Bamberg W., Beldavs Z.G., Dumyati G., Kainer M.A., Lynfield R., Maloney M., McAllister-Hollod L., Nadle J., et al. Multistate Point-Prevalence Survey of Health Care–Associated Infections. New Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:1198–1208. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1306801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yayan J., Ghebremedhin B., Rasche K. Antibiotic Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Pneumonia at a Single University Hospital Center in Germany over a 10-Year Period. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Malek A., McGlynn K., Taffner S., Fine L., Tesini B., Wang J., Mostafa H., Petry S., Perkins A., Graman P., et al. Next-Generation-Sequencing-Based Hospital Outbreak Investigation Yields Insight into Klebsiella Aerogenes Population Structure and Determinants of Carbapenem Resistance and Pathogenicity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e02577-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02577-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Reza A., Sutton J.M., Rahman K.M. Effectiveness of Efflux Pump Inhibitors as Biofilm Disruptors and Resistance Breakers in Gram-Negative (ESKAPEE) Bacteria. Antibiotics. 2019;8:229. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Morais D., Guedes R., Lopes M. Antimicrobial Approaches for Textiles: From Research to Market. Materials. 2016;9:498. doi: 10.3390/ma9060498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Li P., Xu G., Li S.-P., Wang Y.-T., Fan T.-P., Zhao Q.-S., Zhang Q.-W. Optimizing Ultraperformance Liquid Chromatographic Analysis of 10 Diterpenoid Compounds in Salvia Miltiorrhiza Using Central Composite Design. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008;56:1164–1171. doi: 10.1021/jf073020u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mordeniz C. Traditional and Complementary Medicine. IntechOpen; London, UK: 2019. Integration of Traditional and Complementary Medicine into Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Zhang Q.-W., Lin L.-G., Ye W.-C. Techniques for Extraction and Isolation of Natural Products: A Comprehensive Review. Chin. Med. 2018;13:20. doi: 10.1186/s13020-018-0177-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Harborne J.B. Phytochemical Methods—A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. 3rd ed. Chapman and Hall; London, UK: 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Handa S., Khanuja S., Longo G., Rakesh D. Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. International Centre for Science and High Technology; Trieste, Italy: 2008. pp. 21–25. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Patel K., Panchal N., Ingle P. Review of Extraction Techniques Extraction Methods: Microwave, Ultrasonic, Pressurized Fluid, Soxhlet Extraction, Etc. Int. J. Adv. Res. Chem. Sci. 2019;6:6–21. doi: 10.20431/2349-0403.0603002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lu M., Ho C.T., Huang Q. Extraction, Bioavailability, and Bioefficacy of Capsaicinoids. J. Food Drug Anal. 2017;25:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Coskun O. Separation Techniques: Chromatography. North. Clin. Istanb. 2016;3:1–5. doi: 10.14744/nci.2016.32757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Foye W.O., Lemke T.L., Williams D.A. Foye’s Principals of Medicinal Chemistry. 6th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cragg G.M., Newman D.J. Natural Product Drug Discovery in the Next Millennium. Pharm. Biol. 2001;39 doi: 10.1076/phbi.39.s1.8.0009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Santhi K., Sengottuvel R. Qualitative and Quantitative Phytochemical Analysis of Moringa concanensis Nimmo. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2016;5:633–640. doi: 10.20546/ijcmas.2016.501.064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Trease G.E., Evans W.C. Pharmacognosy. Bailliere Tindall Limited; London, UK: 1989. Trease and Evans Pharmacognosy; pp. 376–480. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Harborne J.B. Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis. 2nd ed. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 1984. [Google Scholar]
- 86.Behary N., Smet D.D., Campagne C., Vanneste M. Antibacterial and Multifunctional Polyester Textile Using Plant-Based Cinnamaldehyde. J. Text. Sci. Technol. 2020;4:1–11. [Google Scholar]