Significance
Better understanding of the initial molecular and cellular processes implicated in epileptogenesis is essential for early therapeutic intervention (i.e., before brain damage becomes irreversible). Uncontrolled activity of recurrent excitatory circuits is a common mechanism that promotes epileptic activity. In the dentate gyrus, mossy and granule cells form a recurrent excitatory circuit that can be strengthened upon activity and whose dysregulation has been implicated in temporal lobe epilepsy. Here, we found that acute induction of seizures triggers robust brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)–dependent strengthening of mossy cell–granule cell synapses that promotes further convulsive seizures. Moreover, blocking this synaptic strengthening prevents seizure activity. Together, our findings provide a potential mechanism for early epileptogenesis involving BDNF within a recurrent hippocampal excitatory network.
Keywords: hippocampus, mossy cell, epilepsy, granule cell, BDNF
Abstract
Epilepsy is a devastating brain disorder for which effective treatments are very limited. There is growing interest in early intervention, which requires a better mechanistic understanding of the early stages of this disorder. While diverse brain insults can lead to epileptic activity, a common cellular mechanism relies on uncontrolled recurrent excitatory activity. In the dentate gyrus, excitatory mossy cells (MCs) project extensively onto granule cells (GCs) throughout the hippocampus, thus establishing a recurrent MC-GC-MC excitatory loop. MCs are implicated in temporal lobe epilepsy, a common form of epilepsy, but their role during initial seizures (i.e., before the characteristic MC loss that occurs in late stages) is unclear. Here, we show that initial seizures acutely induced with an intraperitoneal kainic acid (KA) injection in adult mice, a well-established model that leads to experimental epilepsy, not only increased MC and GC activity in vivo but also triggered a brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)–dependent long-term potentiation (LTP) at MC-GC excitatory synapses. Moreover, in vivo induction of MC-GC LTP using MC-selective optogenetic stimulation worsened KA-induced seizures. Conversely, Bdnf genetic removal from GCs, which abolishes LTP, and selective MC silencing were both anticonvulsant. Thus, initial seizures are associated with MC-GC synaptic strengthening, which may promote later epileptic activity. Our findings reveal a potential mechanism of epileptogenesis that may help in developing therapeutic strategies for early intervention.
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder characterized by recurrent epileptic seizures, often associated with profound cognitive, psychological, and social deleterious consequences (1). About 30% of patients are resistant to antiseizure drugs (2). To develop more effective treatments, a better understanding of the cellular and molecular processes implicated in the early stages of epilepsy, before brain damage becomes irreversible, is required. Mossy cells (MCs), excitatory neurons in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus, play a critical role in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) (3–5), the most common form of focal epilepsy in adults (6). However, whether MC activity can be pro- or antiepileptic has been a subject of debate for several decades (3–5, 7, 8). MC loss is a hallmark feature of chronic TLE in both human and animal models (9–13). Recent studies reported that while surviving MCs in a mouse model of chronic TLE play an antiepileptic role (4), these cells could be proepileptic early during initial experimental seizures (5, 14).
Aberrant recurrent excitatory activity is a core mechanism in epilepsy (15). In the DG, glutamatergic MCs and granule cells (GCs) are reciprocally connected, thus forming an intrinsic excitatory loop. Remarkably, a single MC makes more than 30,000 synaptic contacts onto GCs, locally, contralaterally, and along the longitudinal axis of the hippocampus (16, 17). Furthermore, repetitive stimulation of MC axons in vitro induces robust long-term potentiation (LTP) at MC-GC excitatory synapses (MC-GC LTP). The DG is characterized by very sparse GC activity (18–20), and it is believed to act as a gate that opens during epileptic seizures (21, 22). The long-lasting strengthening of MC-GC synaptic transmission is sufficient to overcome the basal strong GC inhibition, thereby allowing MCs to drive GCs and presumably open the DG gate (23). MC-GC LTP is mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signaling (23, 24), which is known to promote TLE (25). Therefore, activity-dependent strengthening of MC-GC synapses may promote epilepsy through the extensive MC projections onto GCs. While an episode of prolonged seizures (e.g., status epilepticus) can result in TLE (26–28), it is unknown whether and how initial seizures can impact MC-GC synaptic strength.
Using multiple complementary approaches, such as chemogenetics, in vitro electrophysiology, in vivo optogenetics, in vivo calcium imaging, and a conditional knockout (cKO) strategy, we found that initial seizures not only increased MC and GC activity in vivo but also triggered a BDNF-dependent strengthening of MC-GC synaptic transmission. In addition, in vivo induction of MC-GC LTP was sufficient to promote convulsive seizures, whereas interfering with BDNF signaling and MC activity had an anticonvulsant effect. Our findings support a proepileptic role of MCs and BDNF in epileptogenesis and provide a potential causal link between MC-GC LTP and epilepsy.
Results
Chemogenetic Silencing of MCs Reduced Acute Kainic Acid–Induced Seizures.
To test the hypothesis that MC-GC LTP has a proconvulsant effect during early epilepsy, we first tested the prediction that silencing MCs should reduce the severity/susceptibility of experimental seizures induced by a single intraperitoneal (IP) injection of kainic acid (KA), a well-established experimental model that leads to later epilepsy (29, 30). A relatively high dose of KA (30 mg/kg) was used to induce strong seizures, which facilitates the detection of a potential decrease in seizure susceptibility/severity. To suppress MC output, the Gi inhibitory designer receptor exclusively activated by a designer drug [hM4D(Gi) or iDREADD] was selectively expressed in MCs. We bilaterally injected a Cre-recombinase–dependent virus expressing the iDREADD under the CaMKII promoter [adeno-associated virus (AAV)-CaMKII-DIO-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry] into the DG of Drd2-Cre mice, whereas Drd2-Cre mice injected with AAV-CaMKII-DIO-mCherry served as control (Fig. 1A). Consistent with previous reports (5, 31), we found that the viral expression was selective to MCs (Fig. 1B). Next, we verified that iDREADD efficiently responded to the DREADD agonist clozapine N-oxide (CNO). Bath application of 10 µM CNO strongly inhibited MC activity in iDREADD-expressing cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S1) and significantly reduced the amplitude of evoked MC-GC excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) in acute slices obtained from Drd2-Cre mice injected with AAV-CaMKII-DIO-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry but not with AAV-CaMKII-DIO-mCherry (Fig. 1 C and D) (iDREADD: 43.8 ± 4.3% of baseline, n = 6, P = 0.0005, paired t test; control: 100.6 ± 5.5% of baseline, n = 5, P = 0.92, paired t test). We then monitored and scored behavioral seizures induced by KA IP injection (30 mg/kg) for 2 h (see Materials and Methods) in both Drd2-Cre mice injected with AAV-CaMKII-DIO-hM4D(Gi)-mCherry (iDREADD) or AAV-CaMKII-DIO-mCherry (control). The two groups were injected with CNO (2 mg/kg, IP) 30 min before KA administration (30 mg/kg, IP) (Fig. 1E). Consistent with a recent study using the pilocarpine model (5), we found that silencing MCs reduced seizure severity and susceptibility, as indicated by significant decreases in the total cumulative seizure score (Fig. 1F) [two-way ANOVA repeated measure (RM); AAV condition: F(1,5) = 7.2, P = 0.04; time: F(1.1,5.6) = 71.7, P = 0.0002; AAV condition × time: F(1,5) = 88.1, P = 0.002] and in the sum score (Fig. 1G) [control: 33.7 ± 5.1, n = 7; iDREADD: 17.8 ± 3.2, n = 6; control vs. iDREADD: P = 0.02, unpaired t test] and an increase in latency to stage 3 (Fig. 1H) (control: 45.7 ± 6.1, n = 7; iDREADD: 91.7 ± 14.9, n = 6; control vs. iDREADD: P = 0.01, unpaired t test). These results reinforce the notion that MC activity has a proconvulsant effect during initial drug-induced seizures.
Initial Convulsive Seizures Potentiated MC-GC Transmission Presynaptically.
We hypothesized that early seizures may increase MC activity and thus induce MC-GC LTP in vivo. MC repetitive activity is sufficient to trigger a robust MC-GC LTP in acute brain slices obtained from healthy rodents (23). Furthermore, a recent in vivo study using a calcium indicator and fiber photometry reported that DG neuronal activity is increased during KA-induced seizures (32). However, the contribution of specific subtypes of neurons, including MCs and GCs, remains unknown. We therefore monitored MC and GC activity in vivo using calcium imaging during acutely induced seizures. To this end, we expressed the genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator jRGECO1a selectively in DG excitatory neurons (SI Appendix, Fig. S2 A–C) by unilaterally injecting AAV-CaMKII-jRGECO1a into the DG of wild-type (WT) adult mice. The animals were then implanted with a chronic imaging window above the dorsal hippocampus, and MC and GC activity was visualized using head-fixed two-photon imaging before and during acute seizures (Fig. 2 A and B). After collecting basal activity, seizures were induced with a single KA IP injection (30 mg/kg). Neuronal activity was monitored during stage 3 of convulsive seizures, which was determined by the presence of forelimb clonus. Saline-injected mice served as a control. We found that during KA-induced convulsive seizures both MCs and GCs displayed robust calcium waves, which were absent from saline-injected mice (Fig. 2 C–F). In total, we recorded 117 MCs and 1,132 GCs from four saline-injected mice and 127 MCs and 1,162 GCs from five KA-injected mice (Fig. 2 and SI Appendix, Fig. S2 D and E). The convulsion-associated calcium waves were observed in almost all (∼99%) recorded GCs and MCs and likely indicated strong, synchronized neural activity in GCs (Fig. 2E) (KA ΔF/F per cell = 2.226 ± 0.016, P < 0.00001, ANOVA; KA ΔF/F per mouse = 2.202 ± 0.181, P = 0.0159, Mann–Whitney U test) and MCs (Fig. 2F) (KA ΔF/F per cell = 1.756 ± 0.058, ANOVA; KA ΔF/F per mouse = 1.793 ± 0.071, P = 0.0159, Mann–Whitney U test). In addition, the seizure-associated calcium waves in GCs were significantly delayed compared with MCs, as indicated by a shift in changepoint (see Materials and Methods) (Fig. 2 G–I) (GCchangepoint − MCchangepoint = 3.261 ± 1.170 s, n = 5 animals, P = 0.049, t test), suggesting that KA-induced MC activity precedes and may drive GCs.
We then tested whether initial KA-induced seizures, by increasing MC activity and inducing LTP, could strengthen MC-GC connections in vivo. We analyzed MC-GC synaptic transmission in both KA-injected and saline-injected mice. After a single KA injection (20 mg/kg, IP), the animals were monitored and killed humanely for acute hippocampal slice preparation once stage 3 of convulsive seizures was reached (Fig. 3A). Sham-injected mice were used as control. MC-GC synaptic function was assessed by activating MC axons while performing whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings from GCs. We found that MC-GC synaptic transmission was significantly strengthened, as indicated by an increase in the input/output function (Fig. 3B) [two-way ANOVA RM; IP injection: F(1,9) = 6.5, P = 0.031; stimulation intensity: F(1.4,12.5) = 64.5, P < 0.001; IP injection × stimulation intensity: F(1,9) = 139.8, P < 0.001], while both paired-pulse ratio (PPR) and coefficient of variation (CV) were significantly reduced in KA-injected as compared with saline-treated mice (Fig. 3C) (PPR: saline: 1.31 ± 0.08, n = 10; KA: 1.01 ± 0.06, n = 10; saline vs. KA: P = 0.011, unpaired t test; CV: saline: 0.44 ± 0.06, n = 10; KA: 0.28 ± 0.02, n = 10; saline vs. KA: P = 0.026, unpaired t test). These results strongly suggest that initial seizures, presumably by inducing presynaptic LTP, strengthened MC-GC synapses in vivo. If so, this plasticity should be occluded in hippocampal slices prepared from KA-injected mice. In support of this possibility, we found that both synaptically induced LTP by repetitive stimulation of MC axons (Fig. 3D) (saline: 155.5 ± 14.7% of baseline, n = 6, P = 0.013, paired t test; KA: 99.2 ± 3.8% of baseline, n = 5, P = 0.85, paired t test; saline vs. KA: P = 0.011, unpaired t test) and chemically induced LTP by transient application (50 µM for 10 min) of the adenylyl-cyclase activator forskolin (23) (Fig. 3E) (saline: 170.7 ± 7.6% of baseline, n = 9, P < 0.001, paired t test; KA: 114.3 ± 9.8% of baseline, n = 6, P = 0.20, paired t test; saline vs. KA: P = 0.0005, unpaired t test) were impaired in KA-injected mice as compared with control (Fig. 3 D and E). Altogether, our findings strongly suggest that early KA-induced seizures strengthened MC-GC synaptic transmission by inducing presynaptic MC-GC LTP in vivo.
We also examined whether KA-induced seizures could modify medial perforant path (MPP) to GC synaptic transmission (SI Appendix, Fig. S3A). We found an increase in input/output function and the ratio of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPA) and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA) EPSCs (AMPA/NMDA ratio) but no change in PPR in KA-injected mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 B–D), suggesting that initial seizures strengthened MPP-GC synapses via a postsynaptic mechanism.
Blocking Seizure-Induced MC-GC LTP Had an Anticonvulsant Effect.
BDNF/TrkB signaling is critical for MC-GC LTP. BDNF is released, by both MCs and GCs, upon repetitive presynaptic activity and is necessary and sufficient for the induction of MC-GC LTP (23, 24). To test whether BDNF is also involved in the seizure-induced strengthening of MC-GC synaptic transmission, occurring in vivo, we conditionally knocked out Bdnf from GCs, a manipulation that abolishes MC-GC LTP (24), and tested whether seizures can trigger MC-GC potentiation in absence of postsynaptic BDNF. Given that experimental seizures can be reduced in Bdnf KO mice (33, 34), we only injected 0.5 µL of AAV5.CaMKII.Cre-mCherry or AAV5.CaMKII.mCherry (control) into the DG upper blade of Bdnffl/fl mice unilaterally (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B) in order to prevent a potential failure in seizure induction when knocking out Bdnf from DG excitatory neurons. Mice were killed humanely 25 min after KA injection, which is the average time for reaching stage 3 convulsive seizure in WT control mice. We then prepared acute slices to monitor MC-GC synaptic function (Fig. 4A). While behavioral seizures were comparable in control and cKO mice (all animals reached stage 3 of convulsive seizures and no higher at 25 min postinjection), Bdnf deletion from GCs (Cre-mCherry+ GCs) prevented seizure-induced MC-GC LTP, as KA IP injection failed to increase MC EPSC amplitude (Fig. 4B) [two-way ANOVA RM; IP injection: F(1,6) = 0.003, P = 0.96; stimulation intensity: F(1.56,9.38) = 57.97, P = 0.0004; IP injection × stimulation intensity: F(1,6) = 287.4, P < 0.001] or decrease PPR (Fig. 4C) (saline: 1.23 ± 0.01, n = 7; KA: 1.25 ± 0.1, n = 7; saline vs. KA: P = 0.90, unpaired t test) and CV (Fig. 4C) (saline: 0.40 ± 0.04, n = 7; KA: 0.42 ± 0.06, n = 7; saline vs. KA: P = 0.79, unpaired t test) as compared with saline-injected mice. The lack of KA-induced synaptic strengthening was not due to viral expression, since KA injection efficiently increased the input/output function (MC EPSC amplitude, Fig. 4D) [two-way ANOVA RM; IP injection: F(1,4) = 23.6, P = 0.008; stimulation intensity: F(1.34,5.34) = 68.9, P = 0.0002; IP injection × stimulation intensity: F(1,4) = 537.0, P < 0.0001] and reduced PPR (Fig. 4E) (saline: 1.34 ± 0.1, n = 5; KA: 0.98 ± 0.1, n = 7; saline vs. KA: P = 0.014, unpaired t test) and CV (Fig. 4E) (saline: 0.39 ± 0.04, n = 5; KA: 0.27 ± 0.03, n = 7; saline vs. KA: P = 0.031, unpaired t test) in mCherry+ control GCs. Deleting Bdnf from GCs did not alter MC-GC synaptic function in saline-injected mice, as indicated by the fact that input/output function (Fig. 4 B and D) [saline: two-way ANOVA RM; AAV: F(1,4) = 0.27, P = 0.63; stimulation intensity: F(1.48,5.94) = 75.57, P < 0.00001; AAV × stimulation intensity: F(1,4) = 174.09, P = 0.0002], PPR (Fig. 4 C and E) (saline control: 1.34 ± 0.1, n = 5; saline cKO: 1.23 ± 0.01, n = 7; control vs. cKO: P = 0.44, unpaired t test), and CV (Fig. 4 C and E) (saline control: 0.39 ± 0.04, n = 5; saline cKO: 0.40 ± 0.04, n = 7; control vs. cKO: P = 0.91, unpaired t test) were similar in Cre+ GCs (Bdnf cKO) as compared to mCherry+ GCs (control). In contrast, KA-injected mice showed a significant reduction in input/output function (Fig. 4 B and D) [KA: two-way ANOVA RM; AAV: F(1,6) = 10.84, P = 0.017; stimulation intensity: F(1.39,8.38) = 64.08, P = 0.00002; AAV × stimulation intensity: F(1,6) = 166.81, P = 0.00001] and significant increase in both PPR (Fig. 4 C and E) (KA control: 0.98 ± 0.1, n = 7; KA cKO: 1.25 ± 0.1, n = 7; control vs. cKO: P = 0.049, unpaired t test) and CV (Fig. 4 C and E) (KA control: 0.27 ± 0.03, n = 7; KA cKO: 0.42 ± 0.06, n = 7; control vs. cKO: P = 0.044, unpaired t test) in Bdnf cKO mice as compared with control animals. GC membrane properties were similar among all of the different groups (SI Appendix, Fig. S5).
To directly address a potential confounding reduction of KA-induced seizures in Bdnf cKOs (33, 34), we also compared MC-GC synaptic function in Cre+ (Bdnf cKO) with Cre− (control) GCs recorded from the same animal following KA administration (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B). The amplitude of evoked EPSCs was significantly decreased (SI Appendix, Fig. S4C) and PPR was significantly increased in Cre-expressing GCs as compared with neighboring Cre-lacking GCs (SI Appendix, Fig. S4D), further supporting the BDNF requirement for the KA-induced MC-GC strengthening. Lastly, Bdnf deletion from GCs also reduced the KA-induced strengthening of MPP-GC transmission (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). Thus, while Bdnf cKO had no impact on basal MC-GC and MPP-GC synaptic transmission and GC membrane properties, it abolished KA-induced strengthening of both MC-GC and MPP-GC synaptic transmission.
Because protein kinase A (PKA) activity is required for MC-GC LTP downstream of BDNF/TrkB signaling (23, 24), we examined whether PKA activation could still induce LTP in BDNF-deficient GCs. Bath application of forskolin (50 µM for 10 min) triggered normal LTP in BDNF-deficient GCs (Cre-mCherry+) obtained from both KA- and saline-injected mice in postsynaptic Bdnf cKOs (Fig. 4F) (saline: 162.9 ± 9.4% of baseline, n = 6, P = 0.0011, paired t test; KA: 161.9 ± 5.7% of baseline, n = 5, P = 0.0004, paired t test; saline vs. KA: P = 0.85, unpaired t test), supporting the idea that postsynaptic Bdnf deletion prevented KA injection from inducing MC-GC LTP in vivo. In contrast, and consistent with our previous results (Fig. 3E), forskolin failed to induce LTP in control GCs (mCherry+) obtained from KA-injected mice but not from saline-injected mice (Fig. 4G) (saline: 171.5 ± 7.2% of baseline, n = 5, P = 0.0006, paired t test; KA: 115.7 ± 8.1% of baseline, n = 7, P = 0.10, paired t test; saline vs. KA: P = 0.0006, unpaired t test). Altogether, these results reveal that initial seizures triggered MC-GC LTP in vivo via a BDNF-dependent mechanism and that such synaptic potentiation occluded subsequent induction of LTP in vitro.
Deleting Bdnf from DG excitatory neurons, a manipulation that abolishes MC-GC LTP both in vitro (24) or in vivo (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S4), could inhibit seizure induction. To test this possibility, we stereotaxically injected AAV-CaMKII-Cre-mCherry (cKO) or AAV-CaMKII-mCherry (control) into both dorsal and ventral DG of adult Bdnffl/fl mice, bilaterally (Fig. 5A). We confirmed that the virus was highly expressed in the DG (Fig. 5B) (control: 85.9 ± 1.9% of DG neurons, eight mice; cKO: 85.5 ± 2.1% of DG neurons, nine mice; ∼1,000 analyzed neurons per animal) and that injection of AAV-CaMKII-Cre-mCherry into the hippocampus of Bdnffl/fl mice strongly reduced Bdnf mRNA levels selectively in the hippocampus (SI Appendix, Fig. S7). Bdnf conditional deletion reduced seizure severity and susceptibility, as indicated by significant decreases in the total cumulative seizure score (Fig. 5C) [two-way ANOVA RM; AAV condition: F(1,7) = 6.0, P = 0.044; time: F(1.26,8.87) = 150.4, P < 0.001; AAV condition × time: F(1,7) = 262.4, P < 0.001] and in the sum score (Fig. 5D) (control: 48.9 ± 6.0, n = 8; cKO: 31.7 ± 4.7, n = 9; control vs. cKO: P = 0.039, unpaired t test) and an increase in latency to stage 3 (Fig. 5E) (control: 21.2 ± 3.5, n = 8; cKO: 51.1 ± 13.4, n = 9; control vs. cKO: P = 0.045, Mann–Whitney U test). Remarkably, c-Fos expression was significantly reduced in Bdnf cKO mice as compared with controls (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Lastly, we found no significant changes in the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous EPSC (SI Appendix, Fig. S9) or in the amplitude of evoked MC-EPSCs (Fig. 4), MPP-EPSCs (SI Appendix, Fig. S6C), and lateral perforant path (LPP)–EPSCs (SI Appendix, Fig. S10) recorded from Bdnf-lacking GCs, showing that conditionally knocking out Bdnf from DG excitatory neurons did not modify the strength of basal excitatory inputs onto GCs. Altogether, these results indicate that seizure-induced MC-CG LTP accentuates the proconvulsant effects of KA.
In Vivo Application of the MC-GC LTP Induction Protocol Promoted Behavioral Seizures.
We previously showed that optogenetic repetitive stimulation of MC axons triggers robust MC-GC LTP in vitro (23). We therefore tested whether in vivo induction of LTP using optogenetic activation of MCs facilitated acutely evoked behavioral seizures. To this end, we selectively expressed the fast variant of channelrhodopsin ChIEF in MCs by bilaterally injecting the Cre-recombinase–dependent AAV-hSyn-DIO-ChIEF-tdTomato into the dorsal and ventral DG of Drd2-Cre mice (Fig. 6A). Blue light burst stimulation of MC axons (MC BS: five pulses of 5 ms at 30 Hz, repeated 50 times every 0.5 s) was delivered through an optic fiber placed above the dorsal DG inner molecular layer (IML) in vivo, and sham light (i.e., no light) was used as a control (Fig. 6 A, B, and F). Optic fiber location and selective viral expression in MCs were confirmed post hoc (Fig. 6B). We also verified that the light stimulation protocol induced MC-GC LTP in vivo. When it does, this plasticity should be occluded in hippocampal slices prepared after in vivo light stimulation. We found that repetitive light stimulation of MC axons failed to induce LTP in vitro when the LTP protocol was preapplied in vivo as compared with control slices (Fig. 6C) (after in vivo LTP: 96.1 ± 7.9% of baseline, n = 6, P = 0.64, paired t test; control: 146.7 ± 4.9% of baseline, n = 5, P = 0.0007, paired t test; in vivo LTP vs. control: P < 0.001, unpaired t test). In addition, both PPR (Fig. 6D) (control: 1.51 ± 0.10, n = 5; in vivo LTP: 1.08 ± 0.09, n = 6; control vs. in vivo LTP: P = 0.013, unpaired t test) and CV (Fig. 6E) (control: 0.41 ± 0.04, n = 5; in vivo LTP: 0.25 ± 0.04, n = 6; control vs. in vivo LTP: P = 0.024, unpaired t test) were significantly reduced after in vivo photostimulation as compared with control mice (sham light). These results strongly suggest that in vivo MC BS (five pulses of 5 ms at 30 Hz, repeated 50 times every 0.5 s) induced presynaptic LTP at MC-GC synapses. We then tested whether in vivo induction of MC-GC LTP can promote behavioral seizures. In these experiments, to facilitate the detection of potential increase in seizure severity/susceptibility, seizures were induced with a lower dose of KA IP (20 mg/kg) 50 min after in vivo induction of LTP (Fig. 6F). Remarkably, we found that in vivo application of a MC-GC LTP induction protocol significantly increased the severity and susceptibility of acutely evoked seizures induced by KA, as indicated by significant increases in cumulative seizure score (Fig. 6G) [two-way ANOVA RM; light: F(1,3) = 100.7, P < 0.001; time: F(1.3,4.1) = 221.5, P < 0.001; light × time: F(1,3) = 109.3, P < 0.01] and in the sum score (Fig. 6H) (control: 18.0 ± 1.8, n = 5; in vivo LTP: 28.0 ± 1.5, n = 4; control vs. in vivo LTP: P = 0.0045, unpaired t test) and a significantly decrease in latency to convulsive seizures (Fig. 6I) (control: 104.0 ± 10.3, n = 5; in vivo LTP: 42.5 ± 7.5, n = 4; control vs. in vivo LTP: P = 0.017, Mann–Whitney U test). While optogenetic activation of MCs could impact their basic membrane properties or synaptic inputs, we found that the stimulation protocol that triggers LTP in vivo did not significantly alter MC membrane resistance or the main excitatory synaptic drive, i.e., GC inputs, onto MC recorded in vitro (SI Appendix, Fig. S11) (see Materials and Methods). Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that in vivo induction of MC-GC LTP can worsen behavioral seizures.
Discussion
In this study, we found that early seizures potentiate crucial hippocampal excitatory synapses, thereby facilitating further epileptic activity. KA-induced seizures not only increased MC and GC activity in vivo but also triggered a BDNF-dependent strengthening of MC-GC synaptic transmission that occluded subsequent induction of MC-GC LTP. In addition, blocking MC-GC LTP and silencing MCs selectively were both associated with significant decreases in seizure susceptibility and severity. Moreover, in vivo induction of MC-GC LTP was sufficient to worsen convulsive seizures subsequently triggered with KA. Overall, our findings strongly suggest that seizure-induced plasticity at MC-GC excitatory synapses may significantly contribute to the proconvulsant role of MCs during early stages of epilepsy.
Initial Seizures Induce BDNF-Dependent Strengthening of MC-GC Synaptic Transmission.
Using in vivo two-photon imaging in awake behaving mice, we found that acutely induced seizures triggered a massive increase in both MC and GC calcium signals (Fig. 2), indicating a robust increase in neuronal activity. Our findings are consistent with a recent study reporting in vivo epileptiform calcium signals detected with fiber photometry in the DG following KA administration (32). While these signals likely reflect the synchronized activity of a large population of neurons, including interneurons, we could assess calcium activity of individual MCs and GCs (Fig. 2 and SI Appendix, Fig. S2 D and E) by combining selective expression of a calcium indicator in DG excitatory neurons and two-photon live imaging. It has been reported that dorsal GCs are mainly activated by ventral MCs (31), which we were not able to confirm given the limited access to the ventral hippocampus of our head-fixed two-photon imaging approach. However, imaging of the dorsal hippocampus revealed that MC activation during convulsion seizures precedes GCs (Fig. 2 G–I). We therefore hypothesize that KA administration activates MCs, which in turn engage GCs. In support of this idea, we have recently reported that MCs express functional extrasynaptic kainate receptors whose activation with submicromolar concentrations of KA can drive MC activity in vitro, whereas GCs show comparatively much less sensitivity (at least one order of magnitude) to KA application (35). While interneurons (36) and CA3 pyramidal cells also express kainate receptors (37, 38), it is unlikely that activation of these neurons could directly drive GCs, although CA3 pyramidal cells could contribute indirectly by activating MCs (39). Furthermore, MCs show higher activity in vivo in contrast to GCs (40–42), making them more likely to be engaged during epileptic activity, regardless the nature of the chemoconvulsant. This last notion is also supported by the fact that MC silencing not only reduced KA-induced seizures (Fig. 1) but also prevents pilocarpine-induced epilepsy (5). Although MCs also excite inhibitory interneurons (16), the anticonvulsant effect of MC silencing (Fig. 1) suggests that MC silencing during initial seizures has a stronger impact on the activity of GCs than interneurons (5). Besides inducing synaptic plasticity, the KA-induced increase in MC and GC intracellular calcium concentration (Fig. 2) may also contribute to excitotoxicity and cell death. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that MCs and GCs are highly active during initial experimental seizures, suggesting that sustained activation of MCs contributes to GC recruitment.
We gathered multiple lines of evidence indicating that initial convulsive seizures induce presynaptically expressed MC-GC LTP in vivo. MC-GC synaptic strength was increased in KA-treated mice as compared with sham-injected animals, and this strengthening was associated with a significant reduction in both PPR and CV (Fig. 3 B and C), suggesting a presynaptic mechanism. Moreover, induction of MC-GC LTP in vitro was occluded after convulsive seizures (Fig. 3 D and E), indicating a common step. The KA-induced strengthening of MC-GC synaptic transmission in vivo was likely induced by the increase in MC activity (35), consistent with the observation that repetitive MC activity triggers robust MC-GC LTP in acute rodent hippocampal slices (23). Although in vitro epileptic activity was associated with a rise in the net excitatory drive between MCs and GCs (5), it is unclear whether this effect results from disinhibition or direct MC-GC synaptic strengthening. Our findings show that both in vivo optogenetic activation of MCs (Fig. 6) and acute seizures (Fig. 3) were sufficient to trigger presynaptic MC-GC LTP.
Several studies indicate that seizures can increase both BDNF levels (43–46) and TrkB activation in the hippocampus (25, 47). In addition, BDNF is necessary and sufficient for MC-GC LTP (23), and it can be released from both MCs and GCs following MC repetitive activity in vitro (24). It is therefore likely that by releasing BDNF, MC and GC activity induces MC-GC LTP in vivo. In support of this mechanism, we found that genetic removal of Bdnf from GCs abolished seizure-induced MC-GC LTP (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Fig. S4), while it did not affect basal MC-GC synaptic (Fig. 3) or GC membrane properties in sham-injected mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S5). Of note, we did not observe any failure of seizure induction when Bdnf was sparsely knocked out. Altogether, our findings indicate that BDNF mediates in vivo seizure-induced strengthening of MC-GC excitatory synapses.
Seizure-Induced LTP at MC-GC Synapses is Proconvulsant.
Our results strongly suggest that activity-dependent strengthening of MC-GC synapses promotes acute seizures. While MCs innervate GCs and inhibitory interneurons, MC repetitive activity that induces MC-GC LTP, at least in vitro, has no effect on feedforward inhibition onto GCs (23), and such repetitive activity does not induce plasticity at GC-MC synapses (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). LTP-induced worsening of seizures (Fig. 6) is supported by the extensive MC projection onto the proximal dendrites of GCs (16) and the powerful MC-GC excitatory drive reported both in vitro (23) and in vivo (31). Given that a single MC innervates as much as 75% of the septotemporal axis of the hippocampus (48), broad induction of MC-GC LTP can be detrimental, underscoring a link between uncontrolled LTP at the hippocampal excitatory synapse and seizures. Conversely, blocking activity-dependent strengthening of MC-GC synapses in vivo reduced induced seizure severity. PKA and BDNF signaling pathways are both necessary and sufficient for activity-dependent LTP at MC-GC synapses (23, 24). Both MC silencing using Gi iDREADD (Fig. 1) and knocking out Bdnf from hippocampal excitatory neurons (Fig. 5) reduced acute KA-induced seizure severity. However, MC silencing not only prevents MC-GC LTP induction but also reduces basal MC-GC synaptic transmission (Fig. 1) and MC output activity. Although Bdnf cKO had no effect on MC-GC basal transmission (Fig. 4) and GC membrane properties (SI Appendix, Fig. S5), we cannot discard an effect on other synapses. In fact, we found that deleting Bdnf from GCs did not alter MPP- and LPP-GC synaptic transmission (SI Appendix, Figs. S6, S9, and S10) but prevented KA-induced MPP-GC strengthening (SI Appendix, Fig. S6). A potential role of MC-GC LTP in this strengthening cannot be discarded. Bdnf deletion reduced c-Fos expression in the DG of KA-injected mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S8), suggesting that BDNF/TrkB signaling contributes to seizure-induced opening of the DG gate, likely by strengthening MC-GC synapses. Consistent with this scenario, optogenetic induction of MC-GC LTP in vivo was sufficient to worsen convulsive seizures. Notably, type 1 cannabinoid receptors, which are highly expressed at MC terminals (49), tonically suppress MC-GC transmission and also dampen the induction of MC-GC LTP (50) in an activity-dependent manner. By suppressing excitatory drive, these receptors could be a potential target to prevent epilepsy (14, 51–53). In agreement with recent findings using the pilocarpine model (5), our results strongly support a proconvulsant role of MCs during early epilepsy. In contrast, in a chronic mouse model of TLE induced by KA intrahippocampal administration, MCs are reportedly antiepileptic (4), suggesting that the role of MCs may differ significantly with the disease stage. A change in MC connectivity that leads to a reduced excitatory/inhibitory drive of GCs could underlie the antiepileptic role of surviving MCs in chronic epilepsy (54).
Compelling evidence indicates that BDNF and its high-affinity receptor TrkB promote worsening of TLE (25, 33, 34, 55–59), but the precise mechanisms and specific contributions of different cell types are not entirely clear. Here we identified two reciprocally connected excitatory neurons in the DG, MCs and GCs, that can mediate the BDNF proconvulsant effects via BDNF-dependent MC-GC LTP. Interfering with BDNF/TrkB signaling in different ways reduced epilepsy—i.e. heterozygous deletion of Bdnf (33), neuronal deletion of Bdnf or TrkB (34), chemogenetic blockade of TrkB kinase activity in TrkBF616A mutant mice (58), and a mutant mouse that uncouples TrkB from its downstream phospholipase Cγ1 signaling (56). Importantly, based on our previous (23) and present (Figs. 4 and 6) findings, these manipulations could also prevent seizure-induced MC-GC LTP and the associated facilitation of epileptic activity. Conversely, overexpression of BDNF in the brain (59) and local infusion of BDNF into the hippocampus (55) worsen epileptic seizures. BDNF is sufficient to induce MC-GC LTP in vitro (23), raising the possibility that in vivo infusion of BDNF promotes seizures by inducing MC-GC LTP broadly. Of note, exogenous BDNF delivery into the hippocampus of chronically epileptic rats can have antiepileptic and neuroprotective effects (60), suggesting that BDNF action might differ with epilepsy stages.
Altogether, our findings uncover a potential mechanism implicated in the early stages of epilepsy before brain damage becomes irreversible. We highlighted how initial seizures can shape an important hippocampal excitatory synapse in a BDNF-dependent manner, and how broad, uncontrolled induction of LTP can be detrimental and promote subsequent induction of seizures. Manipulations that suppress LTP induction and BDNF signaling at MC-GC synapses may be a strategy for the treatment of epilepsy.
Materials and Methods
C57BL/6, Bdnf floxed (Bdnffl/fl), or Drd2-cre (B6.FVB(Cg)-Tg(Drd2-cre)ER44Gsat/Mmucd, MMRRC 032108-UCD) mice (2 to 3.5 mo old, both males and females) were used in this study. All animals were group housed in a standard 12:12 h light:dark cycle and had free access to food and water. Animal handling, breeding, and use followed a protocol approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, in accordance with NIH guidelines. Experimental procedures, involving hippocampal slice preparation, electrophysiology, in vivo two-photon imaging, Bdnf conditional KO (cKO), MC silencing, in vivo induction of MC-GC LTP with optogenetics, seizure induction and monitoring, immunohistochemistry, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and adeno-associated virus vector construction, were detailed in SI Appendix, Supplementary Materials and Methods. Image acquisition, quantification, data, and statistical analysis are also included in SI Appendix, Supplementary Materials and Methods.
For more details, refer to SI Appendix, Supplementary Materials and Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank the members of the P.E.C. laboratory for constructive feedback, especially Coralie Berthoux and Czarina Ramos for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Pascal Kaeser (Harvard University) for sharing an AAV-hSyn-Flex-ChIEF-tdTomato plasmid and Lisa Monteggia (Vanderbilt University) for sharing Bdnffl/fl mice. This research was supported by the NIH grants R01-NS113600, R01-MH125772, R01-NS115543 and R01-MH116673 to P.E.C., and R21-MH120496 to Y.J.Y.; the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (Postdoctoral Fellowship for research abroad), the Fondation Bettencourt Schueller award (Prix pour les Jeunes Chercheurs 2016), and the American Epilepsy Society Postdoctoral Research Fellowship (2020) to K.N.; the Einstein Training Program in Stem Cell Research from the Empire State Stem Cell Fund through New York State Department of Health Contract C34874GG to M.A.F.; and a Whitehall Foundation Research Grant (2019-05-71) to J.T.G. Confocal images were obtained at the Einstein Imaging Core (supported by the Rose F. Kennedy Intellectual Disabilities Research Center, NIH Shared Instrument Grant 1S10OD25295 to Konstantin Dobrenis), and fluorescent in situ hybridization in brain slices was performed using a PerkinElmer P250 high-capacity slide scanner (Shared Instrument Grant 1S10OD019961) at the Einstein Analytical Imaging Facility (supported by Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA0133330).
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2201151119/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix. Original code was uploaded to GitHub (https://github.com/GoncalvesLab/Nasrallah-et-al-PNAS-2022-Collab) (61). Plasmids generated for this study have been deposited on AddGene (190240, 190241) (62, 63).
References
- 1.Fisher R. S., et al. , ILAE official report: A practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia 55, 475–482 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bialer M., et al. , Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: A summary of the Thirteenth Eilat conference on new antiepileptic drugs and devices (EILAT XIII). Epilepsia 58, 181–221 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scharfman H. E., The enigmatic mossy cell of the dentate gyrus. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 562–575 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bui A. D., et al. , Dentate gyrus mossy cells control spontaneous convulsive seizures and spatial memory. Science 359, 787–790 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Botterill J. J., et al. , An excitatory and epileptogenic effect of dentate gyrus mossy cells in a mouse model of epilepsy. Cell Rep. 29, 2875–2889.e6 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chang B. S., Lowenstein D. H., Epilepsy. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1257–1266 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jinde S., et al. , Hilar mossy cell degeneration causes transient dentate granule cell hyperexcitability and impaired pattern separation. Neuron 76, 1189–1200 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ratzliff Ad., Santhakumar V., Howard A., Soltesz I., Mossy cells in epilepsy: Rigor mortis or vigor mortis? Trends Neurosci. 25, 140–144 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blümcke I., et al. , Loss of hilar mossy cells in Ammon’s horn sclerosis. Epilepsia 41 (suppl. 6), S174–S180 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Margerison J. H., Corsellis J. A., Epilepsy and the temporal lobes. A clinical, electroencephalographic and neuropathological study of the brain in epilepsy, with particular reference to the temporal lobes. Brain 89, 499–530 (1966). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Seress L., et al. , Survival of mossy cells of the hippocampal dentate gyrus in humans with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. J. Neurosurg. 111, 1237–1247 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Swartz B. E., et al. , Hippocampal cell loss in posttraumatic human epilepsy. Epilepsia 47, 1373–1382 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Buckmaster P. S., Jongen-Rêlo A. L., Highly specific neuron loss preserves lateral inhibitory circuits in the dentate gyrus of kainate-induced epileptic rats. J. Neurosci. 19, 9519–9529 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sugaya Y., et al. , Crucial roles of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol in the suppression of epileptic seizures. Cell Rep. 16, 1405–1415 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wong R. K., Traub R. D., Miles R., Cellular basis of neuronal synchrony in epilepsy. Adv. Neurol. 44, 583–592 (1986). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Buckmaster P. S., Wenzel H. J., Kunkel D. D., Schwartzkroin P. A., Axon arbors and synaptic connections of hippocampal mossy cells in the rat in vivo. J. Comp. Neurol. 366, 271–292 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Amaral D. G., Scharfman H. E., Lavenex P., The dentate gyrus: Fundamental neuroanatomical organization (dentate gyrus for dummies). Prog. Brain Res. 163, 3–22 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Henze D. A., Wittner L., Buzsáki G., Single granule cells reliably discharge targets in the hippocampal CA3 network in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 790–795 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Pernía-Andrade A. J., Jonas P., Theta-gamma-modulated synaptic currents in hippocampal granule cells in vivo define a mechanism for network oscillations. Neuron 81, 140–152 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Diamantaki M., Frey M., Berens P., Preston-Ferrer P., Burgalossi A., Sparse activity of identified dentate granule cells during spatial exploration. eLife 5, e20252 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Krook-Magnuson E., et al. , In vivo evaluation of the dentate gate theory in epilepsy. J. Physiol. 593, 2379–2388 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hsu D., The dentate gyrus as a filter or gate: A look back and a look ahead. Prog. Brain Res. 163, 601–613 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hashimotodani Y., et al. , LTP at Hilar Mossy cell-dentate granule cell synapses modulates dentate gyrus output by increasing excitation/inhibition balance. Neuron 95, 928–943.e3 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Berthoux C., Nasrallah K., Castillo P. E., BDNF-induced BDNF release mediates long-term potentiation. bioRxiv [Preprint] (2021). 10.1101/2021.1230.474558. Accessed 30 December 2021. [DOI]
- 25.Lin T. W., Harward S. C., Huang Y. Z., McNamara J. O., Targeting BDNF/TrkB pathways for preventing or suppressing epilepsy. Neuropharmacology 167, 107734 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.French J. A., et al. , Characteristics of medial temporal lobe epilepsy: I. Results of history and physical examination. Ann. Neurol. 34, 774–780 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Raspall-Chaure M., Chin R. F., Neville B. G., Scott R. C., Outcome of paediatric convulsive status epilepticus: A systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 5, 769–779 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pitkänen A., Lukasiuk K., Mechanisms of epileptogenesis and potential treatment targets. Lancet Neurol. 10, 173–186 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lévesque M., Avoli M., The kainic acid model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 2887–2899 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rusina E., Bernard C., Williamson A., The kainic acid models of temporal lobe epilepsy. eNeuro 8, ENEURO.0337-20.2021 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fredes F., et al. , Ventro-dorsal hippocampal pathway gates novelty-induced contextual memory formation. Curr. Biol. 31, 25–38.e5 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang X., et al. , Stereotypical patterns of epileptiform calcium signal in hippocampal CA1, CA3, dentate gyrus and entorhinal cortex in freely moving mice. Sci. Rep. 9, 4518 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kokaia M., et al. , Suppressed epileptogenesis in BDNF mutant mice. Exp. Neurol. 133, 215–224 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.He X. P., et al. , Conditional deletion of TrkB but not BDNF prevents epileptogenesis in the kindling model. Neuron 43, 31–42 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ramos C., et al. , Activation of extrasynaptic kainate receptors drives hilar mossy cell activity. J Neurosci. 42, 2872–2884 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Frerking M., Malenka R. C., Nicoll R. A., Synaptic activation of kainate receptors on hippocampal interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 1, 479–486 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Castillo P. E., Malenka R. C., Nicoll R. A., Kainate receptors mediate a slow postsynaptic current in hippocampal CA3 neurons. Nature 388, 182–186 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mulle C., et al. , Altered synaptic physiology and reduced susceptibility to kainate-induced seizures in GluR6-deficient mice. Nature 392, 601–605 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Scharfman H. E., The CA3 “backprojection” to the dentate gyrus. Prog. Brain Res. 163, 627–637 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Danielson N. B., et al. , In vivo imaging of dentate gyrus mossy cells in behaving mice. Neuron 93, 552–559.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.GoodSmith D., et al. , Spatial representations of granule cells and mossy cells of the dentate gyrus. Neuron 93, 677–690.e5 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Senzai Y., Buzsáki G., Physiological properties and behavioral correlates of hippocampal granule cells and mossy cells. Neuron 93, 691–704.e5 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lauterborn J. C., et al. , Differential effects of protein synthesis inhibition on the activity-dependent expression of BDNF transcripts: Evidence for immediate-early gene responses from specific promoters. J. Neurosci. 16, 7428–7436 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Humpel C., et al. , Monitoring release of neurotrophic activity in the brains of awake rats. Science 269, 552–554 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lowenstein D. H., Seren M. S., Longo F. M., Prolonged increases in neurotrophic activity associated with kainate-induced hippocampal synaptic reorganization. Neuroscience 56, 597–604 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Binder D. K., Croll S. D., Gall C. M., Scharfman H. E., BDNF and epilepsy: Too much of a good thing? Trends Neurosci. 24, 47–53 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Binder D. K., Routbort M. J., McNamara J. O., Immunohistochemical evidence of seizure-induced activation of trk receptors in the mossy fiber pathway of adult rat hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 19, 4616–4626 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Amaral D. G., Witter M. P., The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: A review of anatomical data. Neuroscience 31, 571–591 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Katona I., et al. , Molecular composition of the endocannabinoid system at glutamatergic synapses. J. Neurosci. 26, 5628–5637 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jensen K. R., Berthoux C., Nasrallah K., Castillo P. E., Multiple cannabinoid signaling cascades powerfully suppress recurrent excitation in the hippocampus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118, e2017590118 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Marsicano G., et al. , CB1 cannabinoid receptors and on-demand defense against excitotoxicity. Science 302, 84–88 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Monory K., et al. , The endocannabinoid system controls key epileptogenic circuits in the hippocampus. Neuron 51, 455–466 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Katona I., Cannabis and endocannabinoid signaling in epilepsy. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 231, 285–316 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Butler C. R., Westbrook G. L., Schnell E., Adaptive mossy cell circuit plasticity after status epilepticus. J. Neurosci. 42, 3025–3036 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Scharfman H. E., Goodman J. H., Sollas A. L., Croll S. D., Spontaneous limbic seizures after intrahippocampal infusion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Exp. Neurol. 174, 201–214 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.He X. P., Pan E., Sciarretta C., Minichiello L., McNamara J. O., Disruption of TrkB-mediated phospholipase Cgamma signaling inhibits limbic epileptogenesis. J. Neurosci. 30, 6188–6196 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Heinrich C., et al. , Increase in BDNF-mediated TrkB signaling promotes epileptogenesis in a mouse model of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol. Dis. 42, 35–47 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Liu G., et al. , Transient inhibition of TrkB kinase after status epilepticus prevents development of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuron 79, 31–38 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Croll S. D., et al. , Brain-derived neurotrophic factor transgenic mice exhibit passive avoidance deficits, increased seizure severity and in vitro hyperexcitability in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Neuroscience 93, 1491–1506 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Falcicchia C., et al. , Seizure-suppressant and neuroprotective effects of encapsulated BDNF-producing cells in a rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 9, 211–224 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.K. Nasrallah et al., Data from “Seizure-induced strengthening of a recurrent excitatory circuit in the dentate gyrus is proconvulsant.” GitHub. https://github.com/GoncalvesLab/Nasrallah-et-al-PNAS-2022-Collab. Deposited 21 July 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.K. Nasrallah et al., Plasmid from “Seizure-induced strengthening of a recurrent excitatory circuit in the dentate gyrus is proconvulsant.” AddGene. http://www.addgene.org/search/advanced/?q=190240. Deposited 3 August 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.K. Nasrallah et al., Plasmid from “Seizure-induced strengthening of a recurrent excitatory circuit in the dentate gyrus is proconvulsant.” AddGene. http://www.addgene.org/search/advanced/?q=190241. Deposited 3 August 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and/or SI Appendix. Original code was uploaded to GitHub (https://github.com/GoncalvesLab/Nasrallah-et-al-PNAS-2022-Collab) (61). Plasmids generated for this study have been deposited on AddGene (190240, 190241) (62, 63).