Abstract
The gene encoding ςD, sigD, is transcribed from two promoter regions, the fla/che promoter region in front of the fla/che operon and PsigD directly in front of sigD. If ςD is translated from transcripts originating from PsigD, the cell is unable to express motility functions but synthesizes autolysins. Therefore, one function of the additional promoter is to allow the cell to express autolysins without expressing motility functions as well.
Gene expression in bacteria is regulated primarily at the level of transcription. The specificity of transcription initiation, which rests on interactions between the RNA polymerase and the promoters with which it makes contact, is determined by sigma factors. Although most genes are preceded by promoters which are recognized by the main vegetative sigma factor, a subset of genes is preceded by promoters that are recognized by alternative sigmas. These genes are often part of regulons that encode products that are not necessary for normal vegetative bacterial growth but are important under specific circumstances. For example, in Bacillus subtilis most of the genes whose products are necessary for sporulation are transcribed by alternative sigma factors (see references 6, 10, and 20 for recent reviews). ςH is the first alternative sigma factor in this regulatory cascade (10). Gene expression in the forespore is mediated by the activities of ςF and ςG, and transcription in the mother cell is dependent on ςE and ςK (20).
Sporulation is not the only response of B. subtilis to the stationary phase. The onset of stationary phase induces, at least, the synthesis and activity of two additional sigma factors that are not necessary for sporulation, ςB and ςD (10). The ςB regulon is activated in response to different kinds of stress and stationary phase (2, 3). The proteins encoded by ςB-dependent genes serve different physiological functions. It has been proposed that expression of these genes is advantageous during starvation and stress (11), but sigB mutants survive most of the stressful conditions as efficiently as the wild type does (2).
The B. subtilis transcription factor ςD is necessary for the expression of genes required for bacterial motility and autolysins (12, 18, 22). Its counterpart in Escherichia coli, ςF, serves a similar but more specialized function. With a single exception (13), all genes transcribed by E. coli ςF are necessary for motility. Indeed, ςF-negative E. coli strains are partially complemented by a functional copy of the B. subtilis sigD gene (5). The genes of the E. coli ςF regulon are organized in several different regulatory groups (see reference 21 for a recent review). One major regulator, beside ςF itself, is FlgM, an anti-sigma factor which binds to ςF and blocks its activity (28).
In B. subtilis, transcription of the two different groups of genes which are dependent on ςD containing RNA polymerase is influenced by several transition state regulators (19, 24, 30, 31). However, it is not clear whether these effects are due to a direct interaction of these proteins with ςD-dependent promoters or are brought about by the physiological side effects of mutations in the genes encoding these regulators. One of the major regulators of ςD activity is FlgM (4, 9, 26), the counterpart of the E. coli FlgM protein. In its absence, several operons encoding proteins necessary for the late flagellar synthesis are overproduced. Based on genetic data and due to the homology to E. coli FlgM, it is believed that B. subtilis FlgM acts as an anti-sigma factor.
The sigD gene is transcribed by the activity of at least two promoter regions (1, 7). The biological importance of the second promoter, present directly in front of the sigD gene, is not clear. We show that, at least under specific environmental conditions, this promoter is responsible for sigD transcription. If PsigD is the sole promoter to transcribe sigD, the transcription of motility functions is impaired. Therefore, we propose that one function of PsigD and PsigD-derived transcripts is to allow autolysin expression under circumstances which are not favorable for the expression of motility functions.
Transcription of PsigD and ςD-dependent genes in minimal medium.
We were interested in determining whether temporal regulation of PsigD is identical in minimal medium and in complex medium. To that end, we constructed plasmid pSD26 (Table 1) by inserting the 120-bp EcoRI-Sau3AI fragment from pSD5 (1) into EcoRI-SnaBI-digested pDH32M (15). All cloning experiments were done with E. coli DH5α as the host. The resulting plasmid harbors a 96-bp PsigD-encoding fragment of the fla/che operon (positions 1104 to 1200 in reference 23) as a transcriptional fusion with the lacZ gene. The plasmid was linearized and integrated into the amyE gene of B. subtilis 168 to give B. subtilis SD26. In the resulting strain lacZ transcription was dependent solely on PsigD activity. In addition, we constructed pSD28 by ligating the 0.9-kbp ClaI fragment from pSD26 into pKL2 (32). To obtain pSD28N, pSD28 was digested with PacI and EcoRI and ligated to the 0.5-kb PacI-EcoRI fragment from pSD5. This plasmid, which also encodes a transcriptional fusion of sigD to lacZ, was integrated into the fla/che operon of B. subtilis 168 to give B. subtilis SD28N. In this strain, lacZ expression was driven by PsigD activity and the activity of the promoters directing the expression of the fla/che operon. We grew B. subtilis SD26 and SD28N in MOPSO minimal medium (16) with different concentrations of glucose as the carbon source. At glucose concentrations less than 0.2%, the C source was the growth-limiting factor (Fig. 1). Samples were removed at different growth stages, and β-galactosidase assays were done as described previously (27). Each experiment was repeated at least three times. Only the results of a single experiment are given. In MOPSO minimal medium, both PsigD-dependent and fla/che-dependent β-galactosidase expression at the beginning of stationary phase were repressed in the presence of 0.2% glucose. At glucose concentrations of 0.1% and lower, β-galactosidase activity was induced at the onset of stationary phase, presumably due to the depletion of glucose. PsigD-dependent activity of B. subtilis SD26 exceeded the fla/che-dependent activity of B. subtilis SD28N if the glucose concentration was less than 0.1%. This seems rather surprising since, as mentioned above, PsigD drives LacZ expression in B. subtilis SD26 whereas the β-galactosidase synthesis determined in B. subtilis SD28N is driven by PsigD plus the activity of the promoters in front of the fla/che operon. Under all other conditions tested, the β-galactosidase activity of B. subtilis SD28N exceeded the activity of B. subtilis SD26 (data not shown). A possible explanation of the higher levels of β-galactosidase in B. subtilis SD26 than B. subtilis SD28N in minimal medium is the site of integration of the constructs in each strain. The PsigD-lacZ fusion was integrated into the amyE locus. amyE is next to the origin of replication, whereas the fla/che operon is near the terminus of the chromosome (17). If the chromosome is replicating, the majority of the cells contain two copies of amyE and therefore of PsigD-lacZ but only a single copy of the fla/che operon. The fact that LacZ expression determined in B. subtilis SD28N did not exceed the expression determined in B. subtilis SD26 indicated that PsigD activity was far higher than the activity of the promoter region in front of the operon. This implied that the synthesis of the proteins encoded by the upper part of the fla/che operon was reduced or even abolished.
TABLE 1.
Strains and plasmids used during this study
| Strain or plasmid | Genotype or relevant marker | Source or reference |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
| E. coli DH5α | hsdR17 endA1 recA1 gyrA96 thi relA1 supE44 φ80dlacZΔM15 Δ(lacZ-argF)U169 | BRL |
| B. subtilis 168 | trpC2 | BGSC |
| B. subtilis SD26 | trpC2 amyE::(cat sigD-lacZ) | This work |
| B. subtilis SD28N | trpC2 cat sigD (N-term)-lacZ | This work |
| B. subtilis HY5S | trpC2 pHY5S | This work |
| B. subtilis FLI | trpC2 pks::(Pfli-lacZ cat) | This work |
| B. subtilis MOT | trpC2 pks::(PmotAB-lacZ cat) | This work |
| B. subtilis HY5S | trpC2 pHY5S, fla/che::(spec neo T4t) | This work |
| SD28teo/SD30teo | ||
| B. subtilis FLI | trpC2 pks::(Pfli-lacZ) fla/che::(spec neo T4t) | This work |
| SD28neo/SD30teo | ||
| B. subtilis MOT | trpC2, pks::(PmotAB-lacZ), fla/che::(spec neo T4t) | This work |
| SD28teo/SD30teo | ||
| B. subtilis DH32M | trpC2 amyE::(lacZ cat) | This work |
| Plasmids | ||
| pBEST501 | bla neo | 14 |
| pHY5S | bla tet PcwlB-lacZ | 18 |
| pDH32M | bla neo | 15 |
| pHP45Ω | bla spec T4t | 29 |
| pSD26 | bla amyE::(cat sigD-lacZ) | This work |
| pSD28N/30N | bla cat sigD (N-term)-lacZ | This work |
| pSD28T/30T | bla cat spec T4t::sigD (N-term)-lacZ | This work |
| pSD28teo/30teo | bla neo spec T4t::sigD (N-term) | This work |
FIG. 1.
PsigD and fla/che-dependent β-galactosidase expression in minimal medium with different amounts of glucose as the carbon source. Shaded symbols indicate growth of B. subtilis SD26 with the indicated amount of glucose; solid symbols indicate β-galactosidase activity of B. subtilis SD26; and open symbols indicate β-galactosidase activity of B. subtilis SD28N. Circles, 0.2% glucose; squares, 0.1% glucose; triangles, 0.05% glucose; inverted triangles; 0.02% glucose. Activity units are those of Miller (25).
Induction of motility functions is absent in minimal medium.
Some of the proteins encoded by the fla/che operon are necessary for the basal structure of the flagellum. If this structure is missing, the flagellum cannot be assembled. Therefore, the synthesis of proteins necessary for motility which are encoded by genes and operons beside fla/che would be a waste of energy. We therefore asked whether operons which are under direct control of ςD are expressed in MOPSO minimal medium. We constructed B. subtilis MOT and B. subtilis FLI strains encoding fusions of lacZ to PmotAB and Pfli, respectively, by transforming B. subtilis 168 with chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis Pmot-171 and PfliD-224 obtained from A. Galizzi (8). In addition, we transformed B. subtilis 168 with plasmid pHY5S, obtained from J. Sekiguchi, to give B. subtilis HY5S. This strain harbors a fusion of the promoter of cwlB, encoding the major autolysin, to lacZ. The strains were grown in MOPSO minimal medium with 0.05% glucose. The results of this experiment are depicted in Fig. 2. Whereas transcription of the PcwlB-dependent lacZ gene was induced at the onset of stationary phase, Pfli- and PmotAB-dependent transcription was not. Therefore, it was clear that in MOPSO medium with limiting amounts of glucose, the induction of ςD synthesis is not a sufficient signal for the induction of transcription of motility genes but a signal for elevated autolysin synthesis. Mutations in the putative anti-sigma factor FlgM restore hag and motAB transcription in strains with an interrupted fla/che operon (26). Since FlgM has an identical effect on autolysin genes and motility genes (26), it seems unlikely that FlgM is the regulator responsible for this effect.
FIG. 2.
Expression of PmotAB-lacZ (■), Pfli-lacZ (▾), and PcwlB-lacZ (●) in minimal medium with 0.05% glucose as the carbon source. β-Galactosidase activity is plotted against OD600 of the culture. Activity units are those of Miller (25).
Transcription of ςD-dependent genes is affected by insertions within the fla/che operon.
Whereas ςD synthesis in minimal medium seemed to be dependent mainly on sigD transcription starting from PsigD, at least two different classes of transcripts, originating either from PsigD or from the fla/che promoter region, are used as a template for ςD synthesis in complex medium (1). The results described above indicated that PsigD-driven sigD expression induces transcription of autolysin genes but is not sufficient to allow transcription of ςD-dependent motility genes. If this is indeed the case, the temporal regulation of PmotAB, Pfli, and PcwlB should be different as well. PcwlB has to become active as soon as PsigD-dependent ςD synthesis commences, whereas Pfli and PmotAB activity must parallel the Pfla/che-dependent ςD synthesis. We therefore grew B. subtilis MOT, FLI, HY5S, SD26, and SD28N in parallel in NB medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). The cells were grown at 42°C, a temperature which allows a better differentiation between PsigD- and fla/che-dependent ςD expression (32a). Figure 3 shows the result of this experiment. The maximal β-galactosidase activity of each single strain was taken as 100%. In accordance with previous data (1), PsigD activity was induced at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of about 0.5 and reached maximal values at an OD600 of about 0.6. The temporal regulation of cwlB-dependent LacZ expression was similar, but that of PmotAB-, Pfli-, and fla/che-dependent β-galactosidase expression was different. PmotAB- and Pfli-dependent activity did not commence until the OD600 reached 0.7. Maximal activity of fla/che-, PmotAB-, and Pfli-dependent β-galactosidase activity was obtained at an OD600 of about 1. This result is in accordance with the model proposed above. To test the model in vivo, we created an artificial situation where fla/che transcription is blocked in front of sigD. To do so, we constructed plasmids pSD28teo and pSD30teo. First, we created plasmid pSD30N by digesting pSD28N with PacI and BamHI. The protruding ends were trimmed with T4 DNA polymerase, and the plasmid was religated. In pSD30N, PsigD was completely removed. pSD28T and pSD30T were obtained by inserting the Ω element of pHP45Ω (29), which harbors two transcriptional terminators, as a BamHI fragment into BglII-digested pSD28N or as a SmaI fragment into XbaI-digested pSD30N to give pSD28T and pSD30T, respectively. The lacZ and cat genes were deleted by digesting the plasmids with SnaBI. The fragments which code for the 5′ end of the sigD gene were ligated to a 1-kb fragment, created by a SmaI-SnaBI double digest of pBEST501 (14), to give pSD28teo and pSD30teo, respectively. The resulting plasmids confer neomycin resistance to both E. coli and B. subtilis. Integration of pSD28teo into the B. subtilis chromosome inserted the two transcription terminators between orfB and PsigD. In this strain, PsigD was the only promoter to transcribe sigD. Integration of pSD30teo inserted the terminators between PsigD and sigD. Therefore, sigD expression was most probably completely abolished. These plasmids were integrated into the fla/che operon of B. subtilis strains which harbored either the Pfli, PmotAB, or PcwlB fusions to lacZ. The β-galactosidase activity of the respective strains grown in NB medium was determined. Integration of pSD30teo resulted in a loss of β-galactosidase activity (data not shown). Therefore, it seemed unlikely that readthrough from the fla/che operon occurred. PcwlB induction during mid-log phase was not changed by the insertion of pSD28teo, but the same integration had a striking effect on PmotAB and Pfli; the activity of both promoters was severely reduced (Fig. 4). It is not possible to explain this result by the lack of transcription of any gene. In B. subtilis SD28teo, all genes encoded by the native fla/che operon are transcribed either by the activity of the fla/che promoter region or by the activity of PsigD as soon as PsigD is induced (1). However, during mid-log phase, transcription of the motAB and the fli genes was not activated whereas PcwlB activity was induced. The results are in agreement with our model. Transcription of the entire fla/che operon as a single transcript is necessary to allow ςD to transcribe genes encoding motility functions, whereas PsigD activity is sufficient only to drive autolysin expression. We are unable to provide any mechanistic explanation for this phenomenon; nevertheless, this observation is in agreement with some recently published data. Complementation of a sigD-negative B. subtilis strain with a plasmid-located copy of sigD does not restore the motility-negative phenotype of the strain but makes it autolysin positive (33). Mutations which cause a severe reduction of sigD expression also cause a reduced expression of autolysins and motility functions. Overexpression of ςD restores autolysin synthesis but does not influence motility functions (31). Taken together, our results and the results from other groups indicate that transcription of sigD alone allows the expression of autolysins but not the expression of motility functions. Therefore, one of the functions of PsigD is to allow high-level expression of autolysins under circumstances which are not favorable for expression of motility genes. The molecular mechanism which allows this differentiation between the two classes of ςD-dependent genes is under investigation.
FIG. 3.
Relative β-galactosidase activity of different B. subtilis strains plotted against OD600. Bacteria were grown in NB medium at 42°C, a temperature which allows a better distinction between PsigD- and Pfla/che-dependent β-galactosidase activity (data not shown). The maximal activity obtained during growth for each single strain was taken as 100%. ●, B. subtilis SD26 (PsigD-lacZ); ▾, B. subtilis SD28T (fla/che-lacZ); ○, B. subtilis HY5S (PcwlB-lacZ); □, B. subtilis MOT (PmotAB-lacZ); ▿, B. subtilis FLI (Pfli-lacZ).
FIG. 4.
Influence of an integration into the fla/che operon on ςD-dependent gene expression. PmotAB-lacZ (squares), Pfli-lacZ (inverted triangles), and PcwlB-lacZ (circles) activity was determined in a B. subtilis 168 background (solid symbols) and in a B. subtilis SD28teo background (open symbols). Shaded triangles indicate growth of B. subtilis SD28teo/Pfli-lacZ. Activity units are those of Miller (25).
Acknowledgments
We thank J. Sekiguchi (Shinishu University, Nagano, Japan) for donating plasmid pHY5S and A. Galizzi (Universita di Pavia, Pavia, Italy) for providing chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis PfliD-224 and Pmot-171.
We thank W. Hillen (Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany) for financial support.
REFERENCES
- 1.Allmansberger R. Temporal regulation of sigD from Bacillus subtilis depends on a minor promoter in front of the gene. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:6531–6535. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.20.6531-6535.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boylan S A, Redfield A R, Brody M S, Price C W. Stress-induced activation of the sigma B transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:7931–7937. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.24.7931-7937.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Boylan S A, Rutherford A, Thomas S M, Price C W. Activation of Bacillus subtilis transcription factor sigma B by a regulatory pathway responsive to stationary-phase signals. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:3695–3706. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.11.3695-3706.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Caramori T, Barilla D, Nessi C, Sacchi L, Galizzi A. Role of FlgM in sigmaD-dependent gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:3113–3118. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.11.3113-3118.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen Y F, Helmann J D. Restoration of motility to an Escherichia coli fliA flagellar mutant by a Bacillus subtilis sigma factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5123–5127. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.11.5123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Errington J. Bacillus subtilis sporulation: regulation of gene expression and control of morphogenesis. Microbiol Rev. 1993;57:1–33. doi: 10.1128/mr.57.1.1-33.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Estacio W, Anna-Arriola S S, Adedipe M, Márquez-Magaña L M. Dual promoters are responsible for transcription initiation of the fla/che operon in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:3548–3555. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.14.3548-3555.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Fredrick K, Caramori T, Chen Y F, Galizzi A, Helmann J D. Promoter architecture in the flagellar regulon of Bacillus subtilis: high-level expression of flagellin by the sigma D RNA polymerase requires an upstream promoter element. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:2582–2586. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fredrick K, Helmann J D. FlgM is a primary regulator of sigma D activity, and its absence restores motility to a sinR mutant. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:7010–7013. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.23.7010-7013.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Haldenwang W G. The sigma factors of Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:1–30. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.1.1-30.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hecker M, Schumann W, Völker U. Heat-shock and general stress response in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 1996;19:417–428. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.396932.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Helmann J D. Alternative sigma factors and the regulation of flagellar gene expression. Mol Microbiol. 1991;5:2875–2882. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb01847.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ide N, Kutsukake K. Identification of a novel Escherichia coli gene whose expression is dependent on the flagellum-specific sigma factor, FliA, but dispensable for motility development. Gene. 1997;199:19–23. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00233-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Itaya M, Kondo K, Tanaka T. A neomycin resistance cassette selectable in a single copy state in the Bacillus subtilis chromosome. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17:4410. doi: 10.1093/nar/17.11.4410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kraus A, Hueck C, Gartner D, Hillen W. Catabolite repression of the Bacillus subtilis xyl operon involves a cis element functional in the context of an unrelated sequence, and glucose exerts additional XylR-dependent repression. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:1738–1745. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.6.1738-1745.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Krispin O, Allmansberger R. Changes in DNA supertwist as a response of Bacillus subtilis towards different kinds of stress. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995;134:129–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07926.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini A M, Alloni G, Azevedo V, Bertero M G, Bessieres P, Bolotin A, Borchert S, Borriss R, Boursier L, Brans A, Braun M, Brignell S C, Bron S, Brouillet S, Bruschi C V, Caldwell B, Capuano V, Carter N M, Choi S K, Codani J J, Connerton I F, Danchin A, et al. The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1997;390:249–256. doi: 10.1038/36786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kuroda A, Sekiguchi J. High-level transcription of the major Bacillus subtilis autolysin operon depends on expression of the sigma D gene and is affected by a sin (flaD) mutation. J Bacteriol. 1993;175:795–801. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.3.795-801.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu J, Zuber P. A molecular switch controlling competence and motility: competence regulatory factors ComS, MecA, and ComK control ςD-dependent gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:4243–4251. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.16.4243-4251.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Losick R, Stragier P. Crisscross regulation of cell-type-specific gene expression during development in B. subtilis. Nature. 1992;355:601–604. doi: 10.1038/355601a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.MacNab R. Flagella and motility. In: Neidhardt F C, Curtiss III R, Ingraham J L, Lin E C C, Low K B, Magasanik B, Reznikoff W S, Riley M, Schaechter M, Umbarger H E, editors. Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. 2nd ed. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 1996. pp. 123–145. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Marquez L M, Helmann J D, Ferrari E, Parker H M, Ordal G W, Chamberlin M J. Studies of sigma D-dependent functions in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1990;172:3435–3443. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.6.3435-3443.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marquez-Magana L M, Chamberlin M J. Characterization of the sigD transcription unit of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2427–2434. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.8.2427-2434.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Marquez-Magana L M, Mirel D B, Chamberlin M J. Regulation of sigma D expression and activity by spo0, abrB, and sin gene products in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2435–2438. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.8.2435-2438.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Miller J. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1972. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mirel D B, Lauer P, Chamberlin M J. Identification of flagellar synthesis regulatory and structural genes in a sigma D-dependent operon of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:4492–4500. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.15.4492-4500.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Moch C, Schrögel O, Allmansberger R. The ςD-dependent transcription of the ywcG gene from Bacillus subtilis is dependent on an excess of glucose and glutamate. Mol Microbiol. 1998;27:889–898. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ohnishi K, Kutsukake K, Suzuki H, Lino T. A novel transcriptional regulation mechanism in the flagellar regulon of Salmonella typhimurium: an antisigma factor inhibits the activity of the flagellum-specific sigma factor, sigma F. Mol Microbiol. 1992;6:3149–3157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1992.tb01771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Prentki P, Krisch H M. In vitro insertional mutagenesis with a selectable DNA fragment. Gene. 1984;29:303–313. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(84)90059-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rashid M H, Sekiguchi J. flaD (sinR) mutations affect SigD-dependent functions at multiple points in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:6640–6643. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.22.6640-6643.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rashid M H, Tamakoshi A, Sekiguchi J. Effects of mecA and mecB (clpC) mutations on expression of sigD, which encodes an alternative sigma factor, and autolysin operons and on flagellin synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:4861–4869. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.16.4861-4869.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schrögel O, Krispin O, Allmansberger R. Expression of a pepT homologue from Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996;145:341–348. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32a.von Kalckreuth, J., and R. Allmansberger. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Yamanaka K, Araki J, Takano M, Sekiguchi J. Characterization of Bacillus subtilis mutants resistant to cold shock-induced autolysis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;150:269–275. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10380.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




