Context
Since the appearance of the first policy statement on MID in 2002, its understanding has evolved and evidence-based outcomes of new and existing preventive and restorative treatments have become available.
Scope
Visual/tactile assessment instruments and electronically driven devices are available to detect carious lesions and to assess caries risk and activity1. The development and progression of carious lesions can be controlled. The outcome of the caries activity assessment, together with the usage of predictive power of validated caries risk assessment tools, will guide the dental practitioner in deciding which evidence-based carious lesion controlling measures to use and to determine the tailor-made recall sessions.
The demineralisation process of dental caries can be halted largely by the patient reducing the intake and frequency of sugar in the diet and removing the biofilm twice daily with a toothbrush and fluoride-containing toothpaste and dental floss. Evidence- based measures to prevent carious lesions include fluoride in water, in gel, in varnish and paste, and in pits and fissures sealants. Some recently developed measures such as resin infiltration and CPP-ACP paste are promising2.
Minimally invasive operative interventions are limited to the removal of friable enamel and soft dentine, which minimalises the cavity size. Sealing such a treated cavity with a quality adhesive dental material will prolong tooth survival3. Evidence has shown that the long-term survival of repaired defective restorations is as good as that of replaced defective restorations. Replacement is therefore considered over-treatment in many cases while refurbishment and repairing are considered an appropriate minimal invasive operative intervention2., 4..
Definitions
The concept of MID dental caries management is to conserve remineralisable and intact tooth tissue to help retain teeth throughout life. Tooth tissue should not be removed unnecessarily. The major MID components include: (i) early detection of carious lesions and assessment of caries risk and activity; (ii) remineralisation of demineralised enamel and dentine; (iii) optimal measurements to keep sound teeth sound; (iv) tailor-made dental recalls; (v) minimally invasive operative interventions to ensure tooth survival; (vi) repairing rather than replacing defective restorations1.
Principles
The aim of MID is to maintain as much healthy tooth structure as possible and - keep teeth functional for life. This has become all the more important as life expectancy is increasing steadily. People should be able to continue enjoy the full function of a good natural dentition in old age5., 6., 7., 8..
Policy
FDI World Dental Federation supports Minimal Intervention Dentistry (MID) as the contemporary manner to manage dental caries.
Disclaimer
The information in this Policy Statement was based on the best scientific evidence available at the time. It may be interpreted to reflect prevailing cultural sensitivities and socio-economic constraints.
References
- 1.Tassery H, Levallois B, Terrer E, et al. Use of new minimum intervention dentistry technologies in caries management. Aust Dent J. 2013;58:40–59. doi: 10.1111/adj.12049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, et al. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group. Int Dent J. 2012;62:223–243. doi: 10.1111/idj.12007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, et al. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28:58–67. doi: 10.1177/0022034516639271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fernández E, Martín J, Vildósola P, et al. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J Dent. 2015;43:279–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Banerjee A, Doméjean S. The contemporary approach to tooth preservation: minimum intervention (MI) caries management in general practice. Prim Dent J. 2013;2:30–37. doi: 10.1308/205016813807440119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Leal SC. Minimal intervention dentistry in the management of the paediatric patient. Br Dent J. 2014;216:623–627. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ngo H, Opsahl-Vital S. Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 7. Minimal intervention in cariology: the role of glass-ionomer cements in the preservation of tooth structures against caries. Br Dent J. 2014;216:561–565. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hayes M, Allen E, da Mata C, et al. Minimal intervention dentistry and older patients part 2: minimally invasive operative interventions. Dent Update. 2014;41:500–502. doi: 10.12968/denu.2014.41.6.500. 504–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]