Skip to main content
PMC home page
Medline Book to support NIHPA logoLink to Medline Book to support NIHPA
. 2022 Jul;26(31):1–88. doi: 10.3310/EFTV1270

Systematic voiding programme in adults with urinary incontinence following acute stroke: the ICONS-II RCT.

Caroline Watkins, Svetlana Tishkovskaya, Chris Brown, Chris Sutton, Yvonne Sylvestre Garcia, Denise Forshaw, Gordon Prescott, Lois Thomas, Christine Roffe, Joanne Booth, Kina Bennett, Brenda Roe, Bruce Hollingsworth, Ceu Mateus, David Britt, Cliff Panton
PMCID: PMC9376805  PMID: 35881012

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary incontinence affects around half of stroke survivors in the acute phase, and it often presents as a new problem after stroke or, if pre-existing, worsens significantly, adding to the disability and helplessness caused by neurological deficits. New management programmes after stroke are needed to address urinary incontinence early and effectively.

OBJECTIVE

The Identifying Continence OptioNs after Stroke (ICONS)-II trial aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a systematic voiding programme for urinary incontinence after stroke in hospital.

DESIGN

This was a pragmatic, multicentre, individual-patient-randomised (1 : 1), parallel-group trial with an internal pilot.

SETTING

Eighteen NHS stroke services with stroke units took part.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were adult men and women with acute stroke and urinary incontinence, including those with cognitive impairment.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomised to the intervention, a systematic voiding programme, or to usual care. The systematic voiding programme comprised assessment, behavioural interventions (bladder training or prompted voiding) and review. The assessment included evaluation of the need for and possible removal of an indwelling urinary catheter. The intervention began within 24 hours of recruitment and continued until discharge from the stroke unit.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was severity of urinary incontinence (measured using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire) at 3 months post randomisation. Secondary outcome measures were taken at 3 and 6 months after randomisation and on discharge from the stroke unit. They included severity of urinary incontinence (at discharge and at 6 months), urinary symptoms, number of urinary tract infections, number of days indwelling urinary catheter was in situ, functional independence, quality of life, falls, mortality rate and costs. The trial statistician remained blinded until clinical effectiveness analysis was complete.

RESULTS

The planned sample size was 1024 participants, with 512 allocated to each of the intervention and the usual-care groups. The internal pilot did not meet the target for recruitment and was extended to March 2020, with changes made to address low recruitment. The trial was paused in March 2020 because of COVID-19, and was later stopped, at which point 157 participants had been randomised (intervention, n = 79; usual care, n = 78). There were major issues with attrition, with 45% of the primary outcome data missing: 56% of the intervention group data and 35% of the usual-care group data. In terms of the primary outcome, patients allocated to the intervention group had a lower score for severity of urinary incontinence (higher scores indicate greater severity in urinary incontinence) than those allocated to the usual-care group, with means (standard deviations) of 8.1 (7.4) and 9.1 (7.8), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

The trial was unable to recruit sufficient participants and had very high attrition, which resulted in seriously underpowered results.

CONCLUSIONS

The internal pilot did not meet its target for recruitment and, despite recruitment subsequently being more promising, it was concluded that the trial was not feasible owing to the combined problems of poor recruitment, poor retention and COVID-19. The intervention group had a slightly lower score for severity of urinary incontinence at 3 months post randomisation, but this result should be interpreted with caution.

FUTURE WORK

Further studies to assess the effectiveness of an intervention starting in or continuing into the community are required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered as ISRCTN14005026.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 31. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Plain language summary

Urinary incontinence affects around half of stroke survivors. It causes embarrassment and distress, affecting patients’ ability to take part in rehabilitation. It also has a major impact on families and may determine whether or not patients are able to return home. Finding the underlying cause and addressing it can prevent, cure or reduce problems. Doing this in a systematic way for everyone with incontinence problems as early as possible after the stroke, while they are still in hospital, may work best. We also wanted to avoid using catheters in the bladder to drain the urine away, as these are often unnecessary and can cause urinary tract infections. This study aimed to test whether or not continence problems and the use of urinary catheters could be reduced if everyone with incontinence was fully assessed and given the right management and support early after hospital admission. We also wanted to find out if the benefits outweighed the costs. We planned to involve 1024 men and women with incontinence from 18 stroke units in the study, with 512 people receiving the intervention and 512 receiving usual care. However, the trial was paused because of COVID-19, at which time only 157 participants had been recruited. When we were thinking about restarting the study and looked at its progress, we found that not enough people had agreed to take part and, of those who had agreed, many had not returned their outcome questionnaires. This indicated that the trial was not feasible and should not restart. We could not make any firm conclusions about whether or not the intervention worked, as not enough people were involved. We found that stays in hospital after stroke are shorter than they were in the past. This suggests that future studies investigating ways of treating incontinence should consider interventions with management and support for incontinence that continue after patients leave the hospital.

Full text of this article can be found in Bookshelf.

References

  1. Thomas L, Roffe C, Booth J, Bennett K, Watkins C, Roe B, et al. ICONS II: Identifying Continence OptioNs after Stroke. Protocol. Version 2.1. 2019. URL: https://www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/16/111/31 (accessed 26 May 2022).
  2. Tishkovskaya S, Sutton C, France A. ICONS II: Identifying Continence OptioNs after Stroke. Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP). Version 1.0. 2019. URL: https://www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/16/111/31.
  3. Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, Marler JR, Barsan WG, Biller J, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989;20:864–70. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864 doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.7.864. [DOI] [PubMed]
  4. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, Wolfe CD. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke 2001;32:1279–84. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.6.1279 doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1279. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Pedersen PM, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Prevalence and risk factors of incontinence after stroke. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1997;28:58–62. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.1.58 doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.1.58. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Hilz MJ, Neundoerfer B, Heuschmann PU. Impact of urinary incontinence after stroke: results from a prospective population-based stroke register. Neurourol Urodyn 2003;22:322–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.10114 doi: 10.1002/nau.10114. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Williams MP, Srikanth V, Bird M, Thrift AG. Urinary symptoms and natural history of urinary continence after first-ever stroke – a longitudinal population-based study. Age Ageing 2012;41:371–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afs009 doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs009. [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Brittain KR, Perry SI, Peet SM, Shaw C, Dallosso H, Assassa RP, et al. Prevalence and impact of urinary symptoms among community-dwelling stroke survivors. Stroke 2000;31:886–91. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.31.4.886 doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.4.886. [DOI] [PubMed]
  9. Brittain KR, Peet SM, Castleden CM. Stroke and incontinence. Stroke 1998;29:524–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.29.2.524 doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.2.524. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Burney TL, Senapati M, Desai S, Choudhary ST, Badlani GH. Acute cerebrovascular accident and lower urinary tract dysfunction: a prospective correlation of the site of brain injury with urodynamic findings. J Urol 1996;156:1748–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65498-3 doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65498-3. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Pettersen R, Stien R, Wyller TB. Post-stroke urinary incontinence with impaired awareness of the need to void: clinical and urodynamic features. BJU Int 2007;99:1073–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06754.x doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06754.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. Arunabh, Badlani G. Urologic problems in cerebrovascular accidents. In Paulson DF, editor. Problems in Urology, Volume 7. Philadelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1993. pp. 41–53.
  13. Brittain KR, Peet SM, Potter JF, Castleden CM. Prevalence and management of urinary incontinence in stroke survivors. Age Ageing 1999;28:509–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/28.6.509 doi: 10.1093/ageing/28.6.509. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Brittain KR, for MRC Continence Programme and R&D Stroke and Incontinence Study. Urinary symptoms and depression in stroke survivors. Age Ageing 1998;27(Suppl. 1):P72–c–P73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/27.suppl_2.52-b doi: 10.1093/ageing/27.suppl_2.52-b. [DOI]
  15. Brittain KR, Shaw C. The social consequences of living with and dealing with incontinence – a carers perspective. Soc Sci Med 2007;65:1274–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.002 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Pettersen R, Wyller TB. Prognostic significance of micturition disturbances after acute stroke. J Am Geriatr Soc 2006;54:1878–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00984.x doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00984.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  17. Cowey E, Smith LN, Booth J, Weir CJ. Urinary catheterization in acute stroke: clinical realities. A mixed methods study. Clin Rehabil 2012;26:470–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215511426160 doi: 10.1177/0269215511426160. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Clinical Guideline for Stroke. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016.
  19. Booth J, Kumlien S, Zang Y, Gustafsson B, Tolson D. Rehabilitation nurses practices in relation to urinary incontinence following stroke: a cross-cultural comparison. J Clin Nurs 2009;18:1049–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02688.x doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02688.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  20. Kwan J, Hand P. Infection after acute stroke is associated with poor short-term outcome. Acta Neurol Scand 2007;115:331–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00783.x doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00783.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Poisson SN, Johnston SC, Josephson SA. Urinary tract infections complicating stroke: mechanisms, consequences, and possible solutions. Stroke 2010;41:e180–4. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576413 doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.576413. [DOI] [PubMed]
  22. Roth EJ, Lovell L, Harvey RL, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Diaz S. Incidence of and risk factors for medical complications during stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2001;32:523–9. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.2.523 doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.2.523. [DOI] [PubMed]
  23. Aslanyan S, Weir CJ, Diener HC, Kaste M, Lees KR, GAIN International Steering Committee and Investigators. Pneumonia and urinary tract infection after acute ischaemic stroke: a tertiary analysis of the GAIN International trial. Eur J Neurol 2004;11:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00749.x doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00749.x. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. Stott DJ, Falconer A, Miller H, Tilston JC, Langhorne P. Urinary tract infection after stroke. QJM 2009;102:243–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcp012 doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp012. [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Thomas LH, French B, Sutton CJ, Forshaw D, Leathley MJ, Burton CR, et al. ICONS: Identifying Continence OptioNs after Stroke: an evidence synthesis, case study and exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial of the introduction of a systematic voiding programme for patients with urinary incontinence after stroke in secondary care. Programme Grants Appl Res 2015;3(1). https://doi.org/10.3310/pgfar03010 doi: 10.3310/pgfar03010. [DOI] [PubMed]
  26. Roth EJ, Lovell L, Harvey RL, Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Stroke rehabilitation: indwelling urinary catheters, enteral feeding tubes, and tracheostomies are associated with resource use and functional outcomes. Stroke 2002;33:1845–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000020122.30516.ff doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000020122.30516.ff. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Griffiths R, Fernandez R. Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD004011. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  28. Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, Mensah GA, Connor M, Bennett DA, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2014;383:245–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61953-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  29. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet 2009;374:1196–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  30. Lee S, Shafe AC, Cowie MR. UK stroke incidence, mortality and cardiovascular risk management 1999–2008: time-trend analysis from the General Practice Research Database. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000269. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000269 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  31. Wolfe C, Rudd A, McKevitt C. Modelling, evaluating and implementing cost effective services to reduce the impact of stroke. Programme Grants Appl Res 2014;2(2). https://doi.org/10.3310/pgfar02020 doi: 10.3310/pgfar02020. [DOI] [PubMed]
  32. Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Forbes S, Burvill PW, Anderson CS, Stewart-Wynne EG. Five-year survival after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke 2000;31:2080–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.31.9.2080 doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.9.2080. [DOI] [PubMed]
  33. Royal College of Physicians. Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP) Clinical Audit January–March 2016 Public Report. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2016.
  34. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National Sentinel Stroke Audit 2010. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2011.
  35. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Urinary Incontinence in Neurological Disease: Management of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Neurological Disease. Clinical Guideline 148: Methods, Evidence and Recommendations. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre; 2012.
  36. Thomas LH, Watkins CL, French B, Sutton C, Forshaw D, Cheater F, et al. Study protocol: ICONS: identifying continence options after stroke: a randomised trial. Trials 2011;12:131. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-131 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  37. Thomas LH, Coupe J, Cross LD, Tan AL, Watkins CL. Interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;2:CD004462. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004462.pub4 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004462.pub4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  38. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:116–26. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.125704 doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.125704. [DOI] [PubMed]
  39. Guo ZF, Liu Y, Hu GH, Liu H, Xu YF. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in the treatment of patients with poststroke urinary incontinence. Clin Interv Aging 2014;9:851–6. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S61084 doi: 10.2147/CIA.S61084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  40. Liu Y, Liu L, Wang X. Electroacupuncture at points Baliao and Huiyang (BL35) for post-stroke detrusor overactivity. Neural Regen Res 2013;8:1663–72. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.18.004 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.18.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  41. Shin DC, Shin SH, Lee MM, Lee KJ, Song CH. Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary incontinence in female stroke patients: a randomized, controlled and blinded trial. Clin Rehabil 2016;30:259–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215515578695 doi: 10.1177/0269215515578695. [DOI] [PubMed]
  42. Thomas LH, Watkins CL, Sutton CJ, Forshaw D, Leathley MJ, French B, et al. Identifying continence options after stroke (ICONS): a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial. Trials 2014;15:509. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-509 doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  43. Tibaek S, Gard G, Dehlendorff C, Iversen HK, Biering-Soerensen F, Jensen R. Is pelvic floor muscle training effective for men with poststroke lower urinary tract symptoms? A single-blinded randomized, controlled trial. Am J Mens Health 2017;11:1460–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988315610816 doi: 10.1177/1557988315610816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  44. Thabane L, Ma J, Chu R, Cheng J, Ismaila A, Rios LP, et al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-1 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  45. Goldstein M, Barnett H, Orgogozo JM, Sartorius N, Symon L, Vereshchagin NV. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and Other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke 1989;20:1407–31. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.20.10.1407 doi: 10.1161/01.STR.20.10.1407. [DOI]
  46. Adams HP, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke WR, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: a report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology 1999;53:126–31. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.53.1.126 doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.1.126. [DOI] [PubMed]
  47. Shaw C, Matthews RJ, Perry SI, Williams K, Spiers N, Assassa RP, et al. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire to measure the impact of lower urinary tract symptoms on quality of life: the Leicester Impact Scale. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23:229–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20017 doi: 10.1002/nau.20017. [DOI] [PubMed]
  48. Brooke P, Bullock R. Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 1999;14:936–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199911)14:11<936::AID-GPS39>3.0.CO;2-1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199911)14:11&#x0003c;936::AID-GPS39&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed]
  49. Adams D, Bucior H, Day G, Rimmer J. HOUDINI: make that urinary catheter disappear. J Infect Prev 2012;13:44–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757177412436818 doi: 10.1177/1757177412436818. [DOI]
  50. Wallace SA, Roe B, Williams K, Palmer M. Bladder training for urinary incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;1:CD001308. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001308.pub2 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001308.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  51. Avery K, Donovan J, Peters TJ, Shaw C, Gotoh M, Abrams P. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2004;23:322–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20041 doi: 10.1002/nau.20041. [DOI] [PubMed]
  52. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:61–3. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288809164103 doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103. [DOI] [PubMed]
  53. Patrick DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Buesching DP. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument (I-QOL) Urology 1999;53:71–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00454-3 doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00454-3. [DOI] [PubMed]
  54. Wagner TH, Patrick DL, Bavendam TG, Martin ML, Buesching DP. Quality of life of persons with urinary incontinence: development of a new measure. Urology 1996;47:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80384-7 doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80384-7. [DOI] [PubMed]
  55. EuroQol Group. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  56. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 2011;20:1727–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  57. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991;337:1521–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-O doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-O. [DOI] [PubMed]
  58. Bamford J Sandercock P, Dennis M, Warlow C, Jones L, McPherson K, et al. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project 1981–86. 1. Methodology, demography and incident cases of first-ever stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1988;51:1373–80. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1373 doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  59. van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 1988;19:604–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.19.5.604 doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.604. [DOI] [PubMed]
  60. Subak LL, Quesenberry CP, Posner SF, Cattolica E, Soghikian K. The effect of behavioral therapy on urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:72–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200207000-00012 doi: 10.1097/00006250-200207000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed]
  61. Nyström E, Sjöström M, Stenlund H, Samuelsson E. ICIQ symptom and quality of life instruments measure clinically relevant improvements in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2015;34:747–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22657 doi: 10.1002/nau.22657. [DOI] [PubMed]
  62. Booth JBD. Consensus statement on bladder training and bowel training. Neurolurol Urodyn 2020;39:1234–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24345 doi: 10.1002/nau.24345. [DOI]
  63. Personal Social Services Research Unit. NHS Cost Inflation Index. URL: www.pssru.ac.uk/pub/uc/uc2019/NHS-Cost-Inflation-Index.docx (26 May 2022).
  64. Ouyang M, Billot L, Song L, Wang X, Roffe C, Arima H, et al. Prognostic significance of early urinary catheterization after acute stroke: secondary analyses of the international HeadPoST trial. Int J Stroke 2021;16:200–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020908140 doi: 10.1177/1747493020908140. [DOI] [PubMed]
  65. John G, Primmaz S, Crichton S, Wolfe C. Urinary incontinence and indwelling urinary catheters as predictors of death after new-onset stroke: a report of the South London Stroke Register. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2018;27:118–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.08.018 doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed]

RESOURCES