Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2022 Mar 9;11:177. Originally published 2022 Feb 14. [Version 2] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.108675.2

Framing and understanding the whole aspect of oral sex from social and health perspective: a narrative review

Cennikon Pakpahan 1,a, Darmadi Darmadi 2, Agustinus Agustinus 1, Andri Rezano 1,3
PMCID: PMC9377381  PMID: 36035886

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 1

We revised several things from the previous version, including:

  • Clarified our purpose in doing this review at the end of the introduction,

  • Added a method of how this review was conducted,

  • Added information on the country of the study carried out according to the advice of the first reviewer,

  • Deleted information that was not relevant to the topic,

  • And added a future directions section that clarifies the analysis of our findings and our future goals for this topic.

Abstract

Since thousands of years ago, oral sex has become part of sexual behavior among humans. Oral sex is considered taboo. Its taboo does not lie in the behavior, but its expression is deemed inappropriate. As technology becomes more sophisticated, human rights also stand out, leading to the disclosure of the practice in the 21 st century. The oral sex that is discussed on a large scale in media encourages people to express it as feedback whether within right or not. It all depends on the value of each people. We found that this sexual behavior is found everywhere regardless of religion, culture, and race.

Pop culture influences this behavior so much, it can be seen from music, movies, and television programs that provoke oral sex. Many motivations underlying this behavior include getting sexual pleasure for the sake of psychological well-being. But it is undeniable that this behavior is still controversial. It could be at risk of causing disease and, on the other hand, is reported to provide many benefits.

According to our theory, oral sex is not a new behavior crossing boundaries. It is just an old behavior that surfaces because of the factors that support it. This behavior, which is still considered taboo, has its disadvantages such as sexually transmitted disease and oral cancer but has also benefits such as preventing preeclampsia.

Keywords: oral sex, sexual behaviour, psychological well-being, pop culture, sexually transmitted disease, oral cancer, preeclampsia

Introduction

Oral sex is sexual activity with genital stimulation using the mouth, tongue, teeth, or throat. Currently, oral sex is frequent in both heterosexual and homosexual couples. Oral sex involves oral-vaginal contact (cunnilingus), oral-penile contact (fellatio), oral-anal contact (anilingus). 1 Besides that, Keating also stated that breast biting or licking was included in oral sex behavior. Oral sex has become a part of sexual behavior in society regardless of age. 2

Two types of oral sex widely accepted in society are “going down” activities, cunnilingus, and fellatio. The aim of the cunnilingus is stimulation of the clitoris. The cunnilingus can start with a kiss to the lower part of the stomach’s partner and then the thigh's side to the clitoris. 3 Meanwhile, fellatio or sucking (blow job) is an activity the penis will be stimulated by licking by his partner. His partner will lick the shaft of the penis, even the testicles. In fellatio, men can ejaculate, ejaculation can be done outside, or sometimes the partner will swallow ejaculate. This action sometimes causes discomfort and not necessarily for everyone but tasting this ejaculate becomes advanced satisfaction for the “sucker” or “kisser”. Fellatio and cunnilingus can be done simultaneously, known as the “69” position. 3 , 4 Moreover, it must be understood that ejaculate fluid still risks transmitting diseases. This should be considered and communicated to the partner when deciding this.

Oral sex can be considered an ancient activity from past manuscripts. As can be seen from the Hebrew, the Greeks to the Kamasutra manuals and the reliefs of several historical buildings depict this activity. Several moral, religious, medical, legal, and cultural factors influence the practice. Several cultures and religions give perceptive that oral sex is weird and unusual sexual behavior. 4 But currently, the trend of oral sex has increased prominently. The development of technology and media also supports this.

In general, people are less likely to consider oral sex has associated with negative sexual health outcomes and as “having sex”. The discussion of oral sex is important to discuss their associated risks but also the benefits. Recently, the prevalence of men and women who engage in oral sex has increased. The purpose of the present study was to determine role of pop culture towards oral sex, Did this increase due to freedom of expression? what were the motives behind oral sex activity and their associated benefit and risks including moral code and religion?.

Methods

This study was to obtain a complete review and answer questions related to oral sex. We searched for articles and news related to oral sex in Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Emerald databases. For oral sex and pop culture, we use the keywords “oral sex” and “pop culture” or “hooking-up culture” or “film” or “music” or “literature”. To find out the number of cases of oral sex in our population, we used the keywords “prevalence” and “oral sex”. For information related to perspective and attitude related to oral sex, we searched “perspective” or “motives” or “attitude” and “oral sex”, and to review the risks and benefits of oral sex, we searched“benefits” or “risk” and “oral sex”. We reviewed relevant journals based on that keywords. We included original articles or opinions about oral sex that could answer our aims and wrote for each topic. As our attempt to review globally, there were no location/country restrictions included in this review.

Results and discussion

Oral sex and pop culture

Oral sex in this era is introduced in films and music videos, song lyrics, and literature. Several movies and music videos are not reluctantly labeled as hard-core and X-rated. Some scenes in the movie shown in public cinema presented men and women actively and even unstimulated in sexual positions, including oral sex. 5 The Brown Bunny’s Vincent Gallo, 9 Songs’s Michael Winterboom, Nymphomaniac vol 1& 2's Lars von Trier, Love's Gaspar Noe and many more movies are movies that promote explicitly oral sex in a graphic scene in the history of cinema. 6 Other than that in music, “Summer of 69” of Bryan Adams to the most recent Ariana Grande's song “34 + 35” are song which describes how oral sex activities are carried out by both men and women simultaneously with position 69. 7 , 8

These television programs and films also play a role in encouraging premarital sex behavior and uncommitted. 9 This trend is known as “hooking up”, this term refers to sex in an uncommitted and casual context. Oral sex is part of this “hooking up” trend. 10 , 11 Hooking up is depicted through films such as “No strings attached”, “Friends with benefits”, etc., or cable television program such as “MTV's Jersey Shore”. 12

Despite sexual expression between partners, oral sex can also be defined as a form of sexual harassment and violence. 2 Oral sex as a form of sexual violence can occur in heterosexuals and homosexuals. The rate of oral sex as an act of harassment varies widely. This suggests that investigations for sexual harassment do not have to focus on vaginal or anal genitals. However, tracing the oral organs is also necessary to confirm allegations of sexual misconduct. Evidence, for example, can be done by detecting sperm or seminal plasma in the victim's mouth in cases of fellatio or by performing penis swabs in cases of cunnilingus. 13

The prevalence of oral sex of some countries around the world

Wylie conducted an extensive survey on 26,032 participants aged > 16 years in 26 countries from the Americas, Europe, Asia, and Australia. As many as 38% of the participants engaged in oral sex as a sexual activity. Oral sex has a very high prevalence among all sex orientation groups. 14 Meanwhile, data by Richters et al. reported 19,307 Australians aged 16 to 59 found 32% of the respondents had oral sex from their last sexual history. 15 According to D'souza et al., there are differences in oral sex behavior compared to gender, age, and race. Oral sex behavior exists in married couples or adults and adolescents, and young adults. 16 In a report from the Child Trends Data Bank in 2015, adolescents aged 15-19 years, both boys and girls, reported having oral sex as much as 39% and 38%. Women said giving more oral sex than men. 17

In developing countries in Africa, such as Nigeria, it is reported that the influence of the media and the Internet affects a person's sexual attitudes and behavior. Out of 400 respondents, 352 people had oral sex. Some of them learned this behavior from the internet. 18 In Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, a study reported oral sex among high school adolescents in 3840. Adolescents who had practiced oral sex is 5.4% (190) person. Oral sex is closely related to the concept of best friends (AOR = 5.7; 95% CI 3.6-11.2) and having illiterate mothers (AOR = 11.5; 95% CI 6.4-18.5). 19 Besides that, oral sex behavior is one of the activities carried out and offered by sex workers. In some countries in Asia, the percentage of women who engage in oral sex varies 5% in Indonesia, 20 16% in Thailand, 21 and 18% in India. 22 These numbers show that oral sex is not a new behavior in any world. Many of these behaviors are carried out even though it is a developing country and a sophisticated country; the difference is that technological developments accompanied by freedom of expression make this behavior a lot of popping up in the population.

Perspectives and motives in oral sex

In adolescents and young adults, NBC (2005) reports that 40-47% of young people in USA who do oral sex do not need to worry about pregnancy, meet the right person, and feel the sense for the first time. Other reasons, many couples in serious relationships want to experience sexual pleasure but are not pregnant, 23 experience sex without using a condom, 23 26 maintain virginity, 24 , 26 answer curiosity about sexual activities, 24 then believed that oral sex has a low risk of STD transmission. 23 26

In teenagers, having oral sex is related to increased popularity, 27 improvement of relationships between teenagers, 24 , 25 engaging in sexual activity without commitment, 23 assumption that oral sex is not sex, 23 and also sex with someone is a generous behavior. 27 The same perspectives and motivations were also found in married couples. Holway and Tillman reported on the timing of oral sex in marriage among young adult couples in USA. Their report stated that women who were late or never performed oral sex reported being more satisfied with their relationships with their partners. The fundamental reason is they do not feel forced when having sexual intercourse and do not need to worry about the transmission of disease due to sexual relations. 28

Meanwhile, oral sex is behavior that risks transmitting various diseases. Teens and young adults even claim oral sex is less risky and more acceptable than vaginal sex. Sometimes they perform oral sex because they do not want contraception and protection while having sex. 29 This fact shows the need for health workers and counsellors who provide the correct perspective in education or sex counselling. 28 , 29

Penhollow et al. also conducted a study on 408 students in USA. They asked students' involvement in religious activities, frequency of worship attendance, their feelings about religion, their perception of God in sex and then looked at their participation in several sexual activities such as oral sex. 30 Results indicated that religiosity variables, mainly frequency of religious attendance and religious feelings, were significant predictors of sexual behavior such as oral sex. 18 The religious factor was reported as one of the reasons a person does not engage in oral. 16 Apart from that, another influencing factor in higher education. 28

Attitudes in oral sex

Attitudes towards oral sex tend to vary in population. The study surveyed 8600 people aged 16-64 years in Australia regarding their sexual activity. The analysis results stated that oral sex is one of the mandatory activities in sex activities besides kissing, cuddling, and vaginal intercourse. About 74% of their respondents reported that women want stimulation over their genitals orally, and 70% stimulate their partners' genitals orally. 31 This proves that genital mouth stimulation is widespread in married couples. 32

Men at risk for adultery are more likely to engage in oral sex. 33 Oral sex can be used to detect infidelity, material retention behavior, and orgasm with sperm retention. Oral sex, which is used as s detector for adultery, is indicated, for example, in cunnilingus activity; one study states that men are still likely to feel and smell their rival's semen around the vagina related to their previous sexual activity. 34

Many studies have reported that couples during oral sex mostly do not use condoms. However, Auslender et al. from USA reported different results. The results were all in young adults when oral sex took protective measures to reduce the process of transmitting diseases such as Herpes simplex such as microbicide surrogate products. 35

In 2015, a study in Northeastern University, USA enrolled 346 men and women regarding their expressions and attitudes towards oral sex, either receiving or doing for the first time. They address various expressions: happy, fearful, indifferent, strange, disgusted, surprised, relieved, proud, and sad. The most common expression for oral sex recipients was feeling happy (38.7%). Interestingly, 10.8% thought this behavior was disgusting, and 8.2% thought this was strange. In another case who did oral sex, dominant among them felt fearful as much as 17.1%, 15.8% felt indifferent, 2.8% felt disgusted, and only 12% felt happy doing it. 36 Others reported on a focus group discussion study involving women with experiences of fellatio and cunnilingus. They stated a feeling of good emotional vulnerability when engaging in oral sex on their partners. 37

During oral sex, the aim is to orgasm for the partner. Richerts et al. (2006) conducted a study on a large population in Australia, 50% of women experience orgasm during vaginal intercourse, but when intercourse is added with cunnilingus activity, 73% will experience orgasm. Oral sex strengthens the increased incidence of orgasm in partners, especially in women. 15

Oral sex risk

Many reports have stated that oral sex can be local infections, rather a cunnilingus, fellatio, or anilingus. Pathogens that are often transmitted through oral sex are viruses ( Herpes simplex viruses, Hepatitis virus, Human papillomaviruses, and less frequently HIV) and bacteria (mainly syphilis, gonorrhea, group B Streptococcus). 38 , 39 In addition, infections such as Molluscum contagiousum, Candidiasis, Epstein Barr virus, and Aspergillosis can also be spread through the process of oral sex. 40

Gonorrhea infection is possible in oral sex. Sex workers with inconsistent condom use for oral sex were reported 17.1 times more likely infected (95% CI: 8.0 ± 36.5) than consistent condom users to develop pharyngeal gonorrhea. 41 HSV-1 is transmitted through genital and oral contact. This lesion is one of the most prevalent lesions among women, even young. 42 , 43 HSV-1 is more likely to spread to the female genital organs than male genital organs. 44 For young people, acquiring a lifelong recurrent infection such as genital herpes is not only an unfortunate surprise diagnosis, it can also invoke anxiety, guilt, and social-sexual isolation. 45 , 46

Unusual infections have also been reported after oral sex. The incidence of pharyngitis with Trichomoniasis vaginalis was reported in men who routinely had oral sex with their partner who had vaginal Trichomoniasis. 47 So far, it is infrequent for Trichomoniasis to spread by mouth and cause a local infection. In addition, parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii is found in ejaculate fluid, possibly spread through oral sex. 48 , 49 There may be a positive association or association between Toxoplasma transmission and oral sex behavior, especially fellatio. However, this condition depends on the activity of fellatio, whether it will be sperm swallowed or not.

A severe infection has been reported by Froissart et al. They reported two cases of severe infection that occurred through oral sex activity. The first case complained of fever, pubic erythema, penile edema, and cellulitis and the second case complained of genital bubo, foreskin edema, fever, glans erosion, and cellulitis. Both of these cases occurred after performing fellatio activities with their sex partners. In this case, the suspicion of the transmission process was an abrasion of the penis during traumatic oral sex. Cellulitis of the pubis is an infrequent case. The trauma of the genital organs due to the bite of the partner is presumed as a port de entry. 38

Severe soft tissue infections such as Fournier's gangrene were also reported by Lutz and Gerber (2020) through oral sex with commercial sex workers. This male patient experienced swelling and sloughing of the skin of his penis after reportedly engaging in oral sex. During intercourse, his partner nicked the shaft of the penis using her teeth. 50 Takenouchi et al. also reported a rare infection, Lemierre syndrome, in a 58-year-old man after oral sex with a sexual partner two days previously. 51 Lemierre syndrome is characterized by thrombophlebitis of the internal jugular veins and bacteremia caused by anaerobic organisms following a recent oropharyngeal infection. 52

Cunnilingus should be avoided in pregnant women. Hosseini and Hunt reported a case of Streptococcus mitis Chorioamnionitis in a 43-year-old pregnant woman who had oral sex with his partner. This infection occurred ten days before contractions after dental scaling and oral sex. 53 The same case was also reported by Gherman et al. in Australia that infected by Streptococcus viridans after cunnilingus. 54 Both Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus viridans are normal flora in the oral cavity.

WHO's guidelines for adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights in 2018 recommends giving antibiotic prophylaxis to children who experience sexual abuse with the suspicion of one of which is oral sex, WHO considers that oral sex by unknown offender has a significant risk of sexual transmitted disease. 55 According to Barbara et al., oral sex was the riskiest behavior than vaginal and anal sex. Cunnilingus has an OR of 2.199 and fellatio of an OR of 2.756 to have infected. This study reported that people who performed oral activities have higher risks associated with STD/HIV transmission than those not. 56

Other serious risks that arise due to oral sex behavior include human papillomavirus infection, which causes oral squamous papilloma, oral verruca vulgaris, condyloma acuminata, focal epithelial hyperplasia, epidermoid carcinoma, and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. 57 59 One study from Indonesia proves a strong correlation between the activity of oral and anal among homosexuals and HPV infection (OR 6.854). 60 According to Brown et al., women who had more than three times oral sex with their partners in the previous month had a higher risk of developing oral HPV than those who had less. 61

Oral sex benefits

Meuleman et al. reported in Netherlands that oral sex might be a protective factor in recurrent miscarriage cases. This study was conducted on 97 women who experienced unexplained consecutive miscarriages. Recurrent miscarriage cases occur due to an imbalance of immunity in the embryo's implantation into the endometrium. 62 Koelman et al. from The Netherlands also stated that exposure to oral sex could reduce the incidence of preeclampsia. 63

Pittrof et al. performed a study on 619 women engaged in oral sex in USA. They have a lower risk of developing endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory disease than their counterparts. The assumption that oral sex can be a protective factor is that endometriosis and PID require adaptive immunity in the lymphoid system. 64 Meanwhile, the oropharynx is a channel that is rich in lymph channels, thereby facilitating the stimulation of adaptive immunity. Primed lymphocytes in the nasopharyngeal tract will be found later in the endocervix. 65 In addition, it is possible to induce genital T-cells and B-cells through sub-lingual immunization. 66

Testosterone also affects the libido of women. Testosterone in semen can logically affect the libido of the sexual partner. Women who did not use condoms at the time of intercourse had more sexual intercourse than women who did. 67 But there are no specific reports in the case of women who swallowed semen. Semen also had an antidepressant effect, such as serotonin. It has been reported that women whose partners used a condom during intercourse were more likely to be depressed than those who did not use it. 67

Some interesting substances are opioids such as endorphin, enkephalin, and other cytokines also present in semen. These substances affect sperm motility, such as endorphins and calcitonin. 68 Endorphin and enkhapalines function to reduce anxiety and induce analgesia and drowsiness. 69 Likewise, with oxytocin, oxytocin is a hormone that plays a role in increasing bonding and intimacy in partners. This hormone impacts penile erection and female orgasm. 70 However, in the case of semen ingestion, the activity levels of these substances will be significantly reduced in the blood due to the absorption, distribution, and metabolism processes.

Besides that, several benefits are felt during oral sex, such as satisfaction in intercourse and emotional or pleasure in intercourse. A study on 410 women who had oral sex in USA and Germany showed that their male partners delay orgasm so that the intercourse time is longer. 71 Oral sex is a positive activity that provides sexual satisfaction and relationships. 72 , 73

Another benefit of oral sex is sperm retention by male partners. 74 Cunnilingus is considered one of the activities that help women experience orgasm. 15 Reports show that oral sex helps sexual activity last longer than usual. 75 Another study from USA reported that 233 men who had oral sex with their partners would spend more time having sex with them, doing more copulatory behavior that replaced semen, and reported greater sexual arousal. 33 Men engaging in oral sex with their partners as part of strategy provide a more comprehensive range of benefits. Men who are higher in consideration are more likely to benefit their partner. 75

Future directions and conclusion

All agree that “bedroom activities” are private and personal matters. We must understand that one's sexual fantasies and bed activities are a social and moral responsibility. Sometimes it's hard to judge that a “certain bed activity” is right and wrong. If it is closed among couples and both enjoy and accept each other, it's fine to choose what kind of sexual preference. All need to be returned to the individual reason they chose and did that sex activity.

The research we reviewed reported a lot of oral sex activity in the USA and Australia but very few in the Middle East and Asia where western countries are known to be more liberal in sexual behavior. Although considering the perspectives, motivations, and attitudes behind oral sex, some of the reasons and arguments are worth understanding. Oral sex is used as a medium to enjoy each other and show affection for each other but love and sex are two different things. Expression of love does not always end with sex. In the triangular theory of love, sex is included in the passion which is only one part of the love component. 76 So the expression of love which is translated into sexual behavior is not always justified, especially when it gives rise to preferences such as paraphilias. 77 Things like this are often found in married couples. However, not all couples accept all these behaviors, therefore it is necessary to re-communicate what their respective sex preferences are like.

Oral sex has been known for a long-time clash with the moral code and religious values of each people. Although it is an ancient sex behavior, oral sex is not accepted by all circles. The religious factor is one of the factors that shapes people's cognition to consider whether it is right or not. 18 Quoting several religious views regarding oral sex, in Christianity, sex is something sacred and full of commitment. 78 Bed life in the Bible is described a lot in “the book of “Song of Songs”, this section shows that sex is something intimate and sacred between couples. 79 Ed. Wheat and Gaye Wheat in their book “Intended for Pleasure” state that oral sex is not explicitly found in the Bible, but Wheat argues that back to the basic, understanding that everything that is not good and inappropriate for the body is not worth doing. Every human being is responsible for their own body to glorify God as written in 1 Corinthians 7:3-5 and 1 Corinthians 3:6. 80

In Islamic religion, Chawki stated in his article, that oral sex is a disgusting activity and should not be done, but some views state that this is not explicitly stated. 81 Another opinion said that oral sex is something that can be done as long as it is done in the corridor of husband and wife as written in Q.S. Al-Baqarah: 223. 82 Some views also state that except for those explicitly disallowed (such as anal intercourse, oral sex, and sadomasochism), the married couple may pick any practical and mutually agreeable type of intercourse or other sexual activity. 83 In Buddhism, sexual misconduct is exemplified in the Sutra of the Upsaka Precepts, such as sex at the wrong time, wrong place, incorrect partner, virgin or another man's wife; or if he engages in sexual self-gratification. 84 Values like this will affect cognition and are returned to each individual. We agree values like these are important in shaping their perception of (oral) sex. However, a strict understanding of religion also affects a person's rigidity in understanding sex, so sometimes many people fall into disorders such as sexual aversion or sexual disgusting because they view sex as a sin. 85

Comprehending that oral sex is not always safe, everyone should have right “sex education” to be more careful about having oral sex. Especially teenagers and young adults who are not married yet, oral sex that is done just for the sake of popularity, satisfying curiosity is not justified because the risks outweigh the benefits. According to our analysis, it turns out that pop culture and technology are the factors that contribute more to oral sex behavior, although the results of many studies are obtained in countries such as the USA and Australia, we also find these factors in countries such as Nigeria and Ethiopia. 18 , 19 So, parents are needed to direct and monitor teenage about sex. 86

For couples, sometimes pleasure considerations should be put aside rather than safety and health. If oral sex only aims to get pleasure, couples must understand that pleasure does not always have to be with sex, especially oral sex. Couples must understand that there is a “sensate focus”, an activity that can deliver pleasure without having sex. 87 But on the other hand, the health benefits obtained through oral sex such as immune modulation in preventing recurrent miscarriages and preeclampsia deserve to be considered and even investigated further. In the end, oral sex was returned to their respective views with care.

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 2; peer review: 1 approved

References

  • 1. Saini R, Saini S, Sharma S: Oral sex, oral health and orogenital infections. J Glob Infect Dis. 2010;2(1):57–62. 10.4103/0974-777X.59252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Keating SM: Oral sex—a review of its prevalence and proof. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1988;28(5–6):341–355. 10.1016/S0015-7368(88)72863-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hyde JS, Delamater JD:2017; Understanding Human Sexuality . 13th ed. Odoardi E, editor. New York:214–215p. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Fry MJ, Cochran JJ, Ohlmann JW, et al. : Sexuality Now Embracing Diversity. 2019 Cengage Learning. WCN02-200-203.2019;249–251p. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Filmsite: Sex in Cinema: Pre-1920s Greatest and Most Influential Erotic/Sexual Films and Scenes. 2020. Reference Source 3068331
  • 6. Ranker: 15 Movies Where the Actors Really Had Sex. 2021. Reference Source
  • 7. Timeout: Out T. Top 25 oral sex songs. 2014. Reference Source
  • 8. Burgos J: Ariana Grande’34+35′ Lyrics Meaning: Doja Cat, Megan Thee Stallion|StyleCaster. Reference Source
  • 9. Kunkel D, Eyal K, Finnerty K, et al. : Sex on TV 4: A Kaiser Family Foundation Report. Sex TV 4 A Bienn Rep to Kaiser Fam Found .2005;81 Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Garcia JR, Reiber C, Merriwether AM: Sexual Hookup Culture: A Review. Rev Gen Psychol. 2013;16(2):161–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kuperberg A, Padgett JE: Dating and hooking up in college: Meeting contexts, sex, and variation by gender, partner’s gender, and class standing. J Sex Res . 2015;52(5):517–531. 10.1080/00224499.2014.901284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Aubrey JS, Smith SE: The Impact of Exposure to Sexually Oriented Media on the Endorsement of Hookup Culture: A Panel Study of First-Year College Students. Mass Commun Soc. 2016;19(1):74–101. 10.1080/15205436.2015.1070875 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Keating SM, Higgs DF: Oral sex—further information from sexual assault cases. J Forensic Sci Soc. 1992;32(4):327–331. 10.1016/S0015-7368(92)73089-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Wylie K: A Global Survey of Sexual Behaviours. J Fam Reprod Heal. 2009;3(2):39–49. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Richters J, De Visser R, Rissel C, et al. : Sexual practices at last heterosexual encounter and occurrence of orgasm in a national survey. J Sex Res. 2006;43(3):217–226. 10.1080/00224490609552320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. D’Souza G, Cullen K, Bowie J, et al. : Differences in oral sexual behaviors by gender, age, and race explain observed differences in prevalence of oral human papillomavirus infection. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):19–21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0086023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Child Trends: Oral Sex Behaviors among Teens. 2013; (December). Reference Source
  • 18. Asekun-Olarinmoye E, Asekun-Olarinmoye OS, Adebimpe W, et al. : Effect of mass media and Internet on sexual behavior of undergraduates in Osogbo metropolis, Southwestern Nigeria. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2014;5:15–23. 10.2147/AHMT.S54339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Cherie A, Berhane Y: Oral and anal sex practices among high school youth in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Public Health . 2012;12(1):5. 10.1186/1471-2458-12-5 Reference Source [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Fajans P, Ford K, Wirawan DN: STD knowledge and behaviours among clients of female sex workers in Bali, Indonesia. AIDS Care. 1994;6(4):459–475. 10.1080/09540129408258661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Swaddiwudhipong W, Nguntra P, Chaovakiratipong C, et al. : Effect of health education and condom promotion on behavioral change among low socioeconomic prostitutes in Mae Sot, Tak, Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1990. Sep;21(3):453–457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Bhave G, Lindan CP, Hudes ES, et al. : Impact of an intervention on HIV, sexually transmitted diseases, and condom use among sex workers in Bombay, India. AIDS. 1995. Jul;9(Suppl 1):S21–S30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Dotson-Blake KP, Knox D, Zusman ME: Exploring Social Sexual Scripts Related to Oral Sex: A Profile of College Student Perceptions. Prof Couns. 2012;2(1):1–11. 10.15241/kpd.2.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Cornell JL, Halpern-Felsher BL: Adolescents tell us why teens have oral sex. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38(3):299–301. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.04.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Goldstein R, Halpern-Felsher B: Adolescent Oral Sex and Condom Use: How Much Should We Worry and What Can We Do?. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62(4):363–364. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Brewster KL, Tillman KH: Who’s Doing It? Patterns and Predictors of Youths’ Oral Sexual Experiences. J Adolesc Health. 2008;42(1):73–80. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Prinstein MJ, Meade CS, Cohen GL: Adolescent oral sex, peer popularity, and perceptions of best friends’ sexual behavior. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28(4):243–249. 10.1093/jpepsy/jsg012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Holway GV, Tillman KH: Timing of Sexual Initiation and Relationship Satisfaction in Young Adult Marital and Cohabiting Unions. J Fam Issues. 2017;38(12):1675–1700. 10.1177/0192513X15613826 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Halpern-Felsher BL, Cornell JL, Kropp RY, et al. : Oral versus vaginal sex among adolescents: Perceptions, attitudes, and behavior. Pediatrics. 2005;115(4):845–851. 10.1542/peds.2004-2108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Penhollow T, Young M, Denny G: The impact of religiosity on the sexual behaviors of college students. Am J Heal Educ. 2005;36(2):75–85. 10.1080/19325037.2005.10608163 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Smith AMA, Patrick K, Heywood W, et al. : Sexual practices and the duration of last heterosexual encounter: Findings from the Australian longitudinal study of health and relationships. J Sex Res . 2012;49(5):487–494. 10.1080/00224499.2011.598247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Cherlin AJ, Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, et al. : Social Organization and Sexual ChoicesThe Social Organization of Sexuality: Sexual Practices in the United States. Contemp Sociol. 1995;24:293. 10.2307/2077622 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pham MN, Shackelford TK, Sela Y: Women’s oral sex behaviors and risk of partner infidelity. Pers Individ Dif. 2013;55(4):446–449. 10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Shackelford TK, Pound N: Sperm competition in humans: Classic and contemporary readings. Sperm Competition in Humans: Classic and Contemporary. Readings. 2006:1–283. 10.1007/978-0-387-28039-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Auslander BA, Catallozzi M, Davis G, et al. : Adolescents’ and young women’s use of a microbicide surrogate product when receiving oral sex. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2014;27(1):37–40. 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.08.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Vasilenko SA, Maas MK, Lefkowitz ES: “It Felt Good but Weird at the Same Time”: Emerging Adults’ First Experiences of Six Different Sexual Behaviors. J Adolesc Res. 2015;30(5):586–606. 10.1177/0743558414561298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Sovetkina E, Weiss M, Verplanken B: Perception of vulnerability in young females’ experiences of oral sex: Findings from the focus group discussions. Cogent Psychol. 2017;4(1):1–18. 10.1080/23311908.2017.1418643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Froissart A, Martinez V, Jaureguiberry S, et al. : Local infections after oral sex. Med Mal Infect. 2011;41(3):152–153. 10.1016/j.medmal.2010.09.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Cherpes TL, Melan MA, Kant JA, et al. : Genital tract shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2 in women: Effects of hormonal contraception, bacterial vaginosis, and vaginal group B Streptococcus colonization. Clin Infect Dis.2005;40(10):1422–1428. 10.1086/429622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Ran Y, Lu Y, Cao L, et al. : Primary laryngeal aspergillosis related to oral sex? A case report and review of the literature. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2013;2(1):1–3. 10.1016/j.mmcr.2012.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Wong ML, Chan RKW: A prospective study of pharyngeal gonorrhoea and inconsistent condom use for oral sex among female brothel-based sex workers in Singapore. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10(9):595–599. 10.1258/0956462991914726 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Horowitz R, Aierstuck S, Williams EA, et al. : Herpes simplex virus infection in a university health population: Clinical manifestations, epidemiology, and implications. J Am Coll Heal.2010;59(2):69–74. 10.1080/07448481.2010.483711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Peña KC, Adelson ME, Mordechai E, et al. : Genital herpes simplex virus type 1 in women: Detection in cervicovaginal specimens from gynecological practices in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(1):150–153. 10.1128/JCM.01336-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Gray E, Morgan J, Lindeman J. Herpes simplex type 1 versus Herpes simplex type 2 in anogenital herpes; a 10 year study from the Waikato region of New Zealand Erana.2008;121(1271):43–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Azwa A, Barton SE: Aspects of herpes simplex virus: A clinical review. J Fam Plan Reprod Heal Care. 2009;35(4):237–242. 10.1783/147118909789587376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Hendry K: Oral Sex and HSV-1 Knowledge Among College Freshmen Females.2017.
  • 47. Carter-Wicker K, Utuama O, Omole F: Can trichomoniasis cause pharyngitis? A case report. SAGE Open Med Case Reports. 2016; 4:2050313X1668213. 10.1177/2050313X16682132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Dass SAH, Vasudevan A, Dutta D, et al. : Protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii manipulates mate choice in rats by enhancing attractiveness of males. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):1–6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027229 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kaňková HJ, Flegr J: Oral sex: A new, and possibly the most dangerous, route of toxoplasmosis transmission. Med. Hypotheses. 2020; 141(March):109725. 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109725 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Lutz S, Gerber D: Oral-Sex-Associated Fournier’S Gangrene Following Contact With Commercial Sex Worker. Chest .2020;158(4):A868. 10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.806 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Takenouchi S, Kunieda T, Yamada R, et al. : Lemierre syndrome caused by oral sex. J Formos Med Assoc.2014;113(10):762–763. 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Eilbert W, Singla N: Lemierre’s syndrome. Int. J Emerg Med. 2013;6(1):1. 10.1186/1865-1380-6-40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Hosseini BS, Hunt J: Streptococcus mitis Chorioamnionitis after Dental Scaling and Oral Sex. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2020;2020:1–3. 10.1155/2020/9251731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Gherman RB, Browning J, Tramont J, et al. : Streptococcus viridans intra-amniotic infection associated with antecedent cunnilingus. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;39(2):257–260. 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03388.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. OMS: WHO: recommendations on adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights. 2018;1–88p.
  • 56. Santa-Bárbara RC, Hueso-Montoro C, Martín-Salvador A, et al. : Association between sexual habits and sexually transmitted infections at a specialised centre in granada (Spain). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):1–9. 10.3390/ijerph17186881 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Rosenquist SE: Is Oral Sex Really a Dangerous Carcinogen? Let’s Take a Closer Look. J Sex Med. 2012;9(9):2224–2232. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02684.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Fernández-López C, Morales-Angulo C: Otorhinolaryngology Manifestations Secondary to Oral Sex. Acta Otorrinolaringol (English Ed.). 2017;68(3):169–180. 10.1016/j.otoeng.2016.04.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Shah A, Malik A, Garg A, et al. : Oral sex and human papilloma virus-related head and neck squamous cell cancer: A review of the literature. Postgrad Med J. 2017;93(1105):704–709. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Gofur ARP, Bramantoro T, Palupi R: Identification of sexual behavior in community at risk of oral human papillomavirus infection. Syst Rev Pharm. 2020;11(6):543–549. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Brown B, Blas MM, Cabral A, et al. : Oral sex practices, oral human papillomavirus and correlations between oral and cervical human papillomavirus prevalence among female sex workers in Lima, Peru. Int J STD AIDS.2011;22(11):655–658. 10.1258/ijsa.2011.010541 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Meuleman T, Baden N, Haasnoot GW, et al. : Oral sex is associated with reduced incidence of recurrent miscarriage. J Reprod Immunol.2019;133(July 2018):1–6. 10.1016/j.jri.2019.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Koelman CA, Coumans ABC, Nijman HW, et al. : Correlation between oral sex and a low incidence of preeclampsia: A role for soluble HLA in seminal fluid?. J Reprod Immunol. 2000;46(2):155–166. 10.1016/S0165-0378(99)00062-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Pittrof R, Sully E, Bass DC, et al. : Stimulating an immune response? Oral sex is associated with less endometritis. Int J STD AIDS. 2012;23(11):775–780. 10.1258/ijsa.2012.011407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Johansen FE, Baekkevold ES, Carlsen HS, et al. : Regional induction of adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors explains disparate homing of human B cells to systemic and mucosal effector sites: Dispersion from tonsils. Blood. 2005;106(2):593–600. 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Çuburu N, Kweon M-N, Hervouet C, et al. : Sublingual Immunization with Nonreplicating Antigens Induces Antibody-Forming Cells and Cytotoxic T Cells in the Female Genital Tract Mucosa and Protects against Genital Papillomavirus Infection. J Immunol. 2009;183(12):7851–7859. 10.4049/jimmunol.0803740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Gallup GG, Burch RL, Platek SM: Does semen have antidepressant properties? Arch Sex Behav. 2002;31(3):289–293. 10.1023/A:1015257004839 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Mungan NA, Mungan G, Basar MM, et al. : Effect of seminal plasma calcitonin levels on sperm motility. Arch Androl. 2001;47(2):113–117. 10.1080/014850101316901316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Grossman A, Clement-Jones V: 3 Opiate receptors: Enkephalins and endorphins. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1983;12(1):31–56. 10.1016/S0300-595X(83)80028-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Turner RA, Altemus M, Enos T, et al. : Preliminary Research on Plasma Oxytocin in Normal Cycling Women: Investigating Emotion and Interpersonal Distress. Psychiatry.1999;62(2):97–113. 10.1080/00332747.1999.11024859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Sela Y, Shackelford TK, Pham MN, et al. : Do women perform fellatio as a mate retention behavior? Pers Individ Dif. 2014;73:61–66. 10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.020 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Brody S, Costa RM: Satisfaction (sexual, life, relationship, and mental health) Is associated directly with penile-vaginal intercourse, but inversely with other sexual behavior frequencies. J Sex Med. 2009;6(7):1947–1954. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01303.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Brody S: The relative health benefits of different sexual activities. J Sex Med.2010;7(4PART 1):1336–1361. 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01677.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Pham MN, Shackelford TK, Sela Y, et al. : Is cunnilingus-assisted orgasm a male sperm-retention strategy?. Evol Psychol. 2013;11(2):405–414. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Pham MN, Shackelford TK, Holden CJ, et al. : Men’s Benefit-Provisioning Mate Retention Behavior Mediates the Relationship Between Their Agreeableness and Their Oral Sex Behaviors. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(6):1723–1728. 10.1007/s10508-014-0371-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Sternberg RJ: A triangular theory of love. Close Relationships Key Readings. 2004;93(2):258–276. [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Dixon N: Introduction to “The Philosophy of Love and Sex.”. Essays Philos. 2001;2(2):32–36. 10.5840/eip2001221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Avishai O, Burke K: God’s Case for Sex. Contexts. 2016;15(4):30–35. 10.1177/1536504216684819 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Tukker ME: Where sexuality and spirituality meet: An assessment of Christian teaching on sexuality and marriage in relation to the reality of 21st century moral norms. HTS Teol Stud/Theol Stud. 2013;69(1):1–8. 10.4102/hts.v69i1.1343 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Wheat EW, Wheat G: Intended for Pleasure. 4th ed. Washington: Revell;2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Chawki M: Islam in the digital age: Counselling and fatwas at the click of a mouse. J Int Commer Law Technol. 2010;5(4):165–180. [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Thalib M, Ridha A, Ruhiatudin B, et al. : Oral Seks Dalam Hukum Islam Jurusan Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Hukum. Fakultas Syari’ Ah Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/952/1/BAB%20I,%20V,%20DP.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Halstead JM: Muslims and sex education. J Moral Educ. 1997;26(3):317–330. 10.1080/0305724970260306 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Bao H: Buddhism: rethinking sexual misconduct. Journal of Community Positive Practices(Jurnalul Practicilor Comunitare Pozitive), issue: 2/2012, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Crosby CL, Durkee PK, Meston CM, et al. : Six dimensions of sexual disgust. Pers Individ Dif [Internet]. 2020;156(November2019):109714. 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109714 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Quinn DA, Lewin A: Family religiosity, parental monitoring, and emerging adults’ sexual behavior. Religions. 2018;10(2):1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Pakpahan C, Agustinus A, Darmadi D: Comprehensive intersystemic assessment approach to relieve psychogenic erectile dysfunction: A review. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021;9:189–196. 10.3889/oamjms.2021.6116 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2022 Jun 27. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.121886.r140813

Reviewer response for version 2

Gina Anindyajati 1

Comprehensive discussion

  • Introduction - the purpose of this review is not exactly aligned with the title of the manuscript. As a reader, we expected to develop understanding about oral sex activities from the social and health perspectives. However, in the introduction we were getting more information on the definition of oral sex. Probably, it will be more suitable if the authors emphasise more on the contrary view between many perspectives about oral sex, thus point out the importance of the authors review.

  • Introduction -  considering the purpose of this study, will it be more appropriate if the authors make a comparison about view or trend of oral sex, before and after the technological advancement as well as the increase penetration of pop culture? This will need a specific time period as boundaries for the literature searching as well as the discussion part.

  • Introduction - if the authors decided to write the comparison, it is also essential to write the effect of this difference in order to give a sense of urgency. For example, the authors can put how the increase of oral sex behaviours lead to higher incidence of STDs, oral cancer, etc. A paper from Kumar et al (2015) might be a start to look for further supporting evidence. 1

  • Another specific part needed from this manuscript is regarding the scope. Since it is a global view, maybe we can make it more pointed for the title.

  • Method - any inclusion or exclusion criteria for the articles used in this narrative? For example, language and years of publication?

  • Results - write a statement about how the authors found their evidence; including how many papers the authors found, limitation and strength of their evidence.

  • Discussion - please provide specific time references for pop culture. Will it be different now and then, or can we generalise all time periods of any pop culture product?

  • Discussion - start with direct answer of the manuscript’s objective, followed by description of the authors finding and any relevant evidence.

Factual statements & citation

  • Introduction - Is there any supporting evidence for this claim? But currently, the trend of oral sex has increased prominently. The development of technology and media also supports this.

  • Reference from Lewis & Marston can be used to support the evidence from young adults perspectives, in regards to social narrative. 2

  • Results & Discussion - Is there any supporting evidence for this claim? the difference is that technological developments accompanied by freedom of expression make this behaviour a lot of popping up in the population

  • Discussion - since the authors would like to explain the role of pop culture, it will be helpful for the reader to get a description on how pop culture is spread worldwide. Whether there was any difference due to licence, law, or any public policy, and maybe the country’s perspective about sexual content on any entertainment forms.

Language

  • The manuscript is provided with clear definition about oral sex, however it will be helpful if the authors write about what they meant about pop culture, social as well as health views in the introduction part.

  • The manuscript is written in English by using the grammar of Indonesian language. It will be easier to understand the objective and main point of this article, if this manuscript is being consulted with a formal service for academic writing.

Conclusions

  • Future direction & Conclusion - this part was enriched by the religious view, unfortunately the view was not discussed on the result & discussion section. The authors need to rearrange the structure of their paragraph, so it will be coherent and in line with the objective.

Future direction & conclusion shall be started with direct answer of the manuscript’s objective.

Is the review written in accessible language?

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

Partly

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Psychosexual; including sexual identity and behavior in psychiatric field

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Oral sex and oral health: An enigma in itself. Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS .36(2) : 10.4103/0253-7184.167133 129-32 10.4103/0253-7184.167133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. : Oral Sex, Young People, and Gendered Narratives of Reciprocity. J Sex Res .53(7) : 10.1080/00224499.2015.1117564 776-87 10.1080/00224499.2015.1117564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2022 Jul 11.
Cennikon Pakpahan 1

Thank you very much for your valuable opinion on our paper. 

1. We added some further explanations in the introduction, reinforcing the ideas conveyed through this article. What are the social and health aspects that are the pros and cons of oral sex? We reaffirm the purpose of this review according to the title. In addition to the introduction, we added supporting articles according to the reviewer’s suggestions.

2. We removed the method, result, and discussion sections to avoid confusion/misunderstanding of this type of article. Following the title, the approach we use in writing this article is a narrative review (literature review), which is undoubtedly different from a systematic review. Narrative review does not require a particular protocol or criteria for articles to be included in the review, as Ferrari (2015) stated in his article, “Writing narrative style in literature reviews”. So, in particular, we do not have a systematic report on how many articles were by the theme we conveyed, like a systematic review.

3. We added narration on oral sex and pop culture, according to the reviewer’s suggestion. The explanation of the influence of pop culture deserves attention. The extent to which pop culture has an impact on oral sex is also added.

4. We have added some suggestions regarding citations to provide strong evidence for our paper.

5. We proofread the language according to academic needs.

6. In the future directions and conclusion session, we changed it to “religion and moral issue in oral sex.” While the conclusion section we made at the end and written according to the article’s purpose at the beginning, as suggested by reviewers.

We wait for good news from you. 

Best Regards

F1000Res. 2022 May 30. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.121886.r138176

Reviewer response for version 2

Gajanan S Bhat 1

Though I appreciate the authors for their excellent effort to address an important issue such as oral sex, the stated aim in the introduction in no way matches the description and hence there is a total disconnect with the stated aim and the details in the article.

Another important shortcoming of the article is the methodology. Whether you call the review a narrative or otherwise, the details of methodology and the literature extracted for review are too little to call it a review. Because of these shortcomings, I cant accept this as a review. It can at best be called a short communication or a letter to the editor. Kindly go through the following referenced article for improving the manuscript 1 .

Is the review written in accessible language?

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

No

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

No

Reviewer Expertise:

Sexual Medicine

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

References

F1000Res. 2022 May 30.
Cennikon Pakpahan 1

Dear Reviewer,  

Thank you for your valuable review for our paper, but there are some things we need to clarify regarding the methods and literature suggestions the reviewer provides.

We take a narrative review approach instead of a systematic review by the type of approach we take on this issue. Refer to some literature related to the definition of this Narrative review. Narrative Review or Narrative Overview or Literature Review is the type first-year college students often learn as a general approach. Its purpose is to identify a few studies that describe a problem of interest. Narrative reviews have no predetermined research question or specified search strategy, only a topic of interest. They are not systematic and follow no specified protocol. No standards or protocols guide the review. Meanwhile, the literature suggestion you gave is an approach in a systematic review, not a narrative review. We think that the two are different.

Therefore, because we wrote this in the form of a narrative review, we have followed the writing protocol as recommended https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/narrative-review

Here are some references that we include to explain the types of articles we write.

1. Ferrari, Rossella. Writing narrative style literature reviews. 2015. Medical Writing Vol. 24. DOI: 10.1179/2047480615Z.000000000329

2. Green, Bart, Johnson, Claire, Adams, Alan. Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade. 2001. JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE. available from: https://familymedicine.med.wayne.edu/mph/project/green_2006_narrative_literature_reviews.pdf

For your suggestion about the aims and the explanation, we will try to improve it. 

Best Regards,

F1000Res. 2022 Jul 11.
Cennikon Pakpahan 1

Thank you for your valuable opinion on our paper.

We try to revise the paper according to your suggestion. 

We wait for the good news.

F1000Res. 2022 Mar 10. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.121886.r126698

Reviewer response for version 2

Thi Tu An Nguyen 1

Dear authors, 

Thank you for quickly revising this article as I suggested. It is much better now. 

Good luck,

An

Is the review written in accessible language?

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

Partly

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

sexual and reproductive health, disability, applied health, sociology, anthropology, family and gender.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

F1000Res. 2022 Mar 10.
Cennikon Pakpahan 1

Thank you for your very meaningful input to improve our article.

F1000Res. 2022 Feb 15. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.120083.r123285

Reviewer response for version 1

Thi Tu An Nguyen 1

First, I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you for giving me this chance to review this interesting topic.

In my opinion, I would like to say thank you to the authors who spent time writing this article. However, this is not a review paper, because:

  • There is no rationale for this paper. Why did you do this review? What contexts are you looking for? Are you looking for this in a certain country or globally?

  • Method: what databases did you search for these papers? Time frame? Countries? Etc?

  • The topic of the review is not discussed comprehensively in the context. To me, this paper is very descriptive. It needs more critical thinking.

  • The conclusion is so simple. The authors should restate their aims/objectives and future directions or implications (if needed).

I think this paper should be revised a lot before it can be published. My recommendations are below:

Introduction:

The authors need to clarify: Why are you doing this review? What are your aims/objectives?

Defining oral sex and pop culture

Paragraph No3 (from the top) - page 3/9: The last sentence needs references.

Paragraph No4 (from the top) - page 3/9: The first sentence needs references.

Prevalence of oral sex

I suggest this headline should be The prevalence of oral sex of some countries around the world.

This section is so descriptive. You should say some things such as what is your thinking of these oral sex rates?

Perspectives and motives in oral sex

You should add on the countries where these studies were conducted. Again, what do you think about these studies influencing your aims?

Attitudes in oral sex

Again, which nationalities of these participants in these studies?

Paragraphs No 2&3 should be deleted because they are irrelevant to this section.

Oral sex risk

This section is good.

Benefits obtained due to oral sex

I suggest this headline should be “oral sex benefits”.

Again, which nationalities of these participants in these studies?

Is the review written in accessible language?

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn appropriate in the context of the current research literature?

Partly

Is the topic of the review discussed comprehensively in the context of the current literature?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

sexual and reproductive health, disability, applied health, sociology, anthropology, family and gender.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2022 Feb 26.
Cennikon Pakpahan 1

We are very grateful for the excellent feedback from reviewers. We have considered it and revised it according to your suggestions in our latest version. We are waiting for a good response from you.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    No data are associated with this article.


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES